Upload
packed-vzw
View
257
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
COLLECTION DATA
Descriptive, technical, administrative (meta)data
stored in and managed through collection
management systems, DAM’s, URL resolvers, API’s,
use casePERSISTENT URI’s
DATAHUB FOR MUSEUMSMatthias Vandermaesen
DATA MANAGER•Acts as a gatekeeper. •Maintains collection data. •Responsible for the publication of collection data.
RESTful API’s
objectnamehttp://
vocab.getty.edu/aat/300033799
use caseNEW INSIGHTS THROUGH VISUALISATIONS
use caseDIGITAL MIND-SET IN MUSEUMS
artworkhttp://
collectievlaamsegemeenschap.be/collectie/work/id/
1856
datahttp://kmska.be/
collectie/work/data/1856
image http://kmska.be/collectie/work/
representation/1856
image http://lukasweb.be/
collectie/work/representation/1856
datahttp://
collectievlaamsegemeenschap.be/
collectie/work/data/1856
creatorhttp://viaf.org/
viaf/312406452/
placehttp://
www.geonames.org/2797656/
DATAHUB
use caseENRICHMENT THROUGH LINKED DATA
DATA INGEST
DATA RETRIEVAL
use case:TARGET SPECIFIC AUDIENCES THROUGH END-USER APPLICATIONS
use case:SHARE DATA THROUGH EXTERNAL AGGREGATORS
LOCKED DATA
•Cultural institutions as drivers for the expansion of knowledge and creativity. •Accessible data and innovative on line technologies are a key condition.•But! Lack of an overall digital mind-set.•Vast quantities of contextual data remain locked in repositories.
Phase 1 (2016)
•Design of an universal model architecture for a datahub. •The development of an open source datahub framework package. •Foster a community of developers and users of the software. •The deployment of a reference implementation in the three Flemish fine art museums.
COLLABORATION
•Collaboration is a good strategy.•Sharing knowledge and resources enrich the scope of complex digital projects.•A practical hands-on and cross-disciplinary approach further ensures meeting project goals.
THE DATAHUB PROJECT
•In 2013 Flemish Art Collection and Contemporary Arts Heritage Flanders, asked PACKED to analyze the data flows in seven museums Ghent, Antwerp, Ostend and Bruges. •A mutual workplan was drafted to shape current architecture of services and systems.•In 2015 the partners started to work on the last phase of this trajectory: a joint datahub architecture scheduled to be released as an open source project.
PROJECT IMPACT
•Lower the bar for museums to connect their data with modern technologies in a durable fashion.•Flexible reuse of collection data when targeting a diverse, international audience or specific niches.•Give museums fine-grained control based on a transparent licensing model.•A major improvement in accessibility of data curated by Flemish museums.•Close the gap between software developers and the cultural heritage domain.
RICH REUSABLE DATA IN OPEN
FORMATS (LIDO XML, JSON, …)
DISH 07.12.2015
Alina [email protected]
Phase 2 (2017)
•Community driven improvement of the software package.•Expanding the community on an international level. •Establish durable maintenance of the software.•Integrate 4 Flemish contemporary art museums in a datahub implementation.
PROJECT PLAN 2016 – 2017:
RESOLVER SERVICE
External authorities•Wikidata•RKDartists•VIAF•Iconclass•GeoNames•Getty Vocabularies: LOD