17
Production & Operations Management Page 1 We have chosen our business as a press firm and whose name is . Every year we publish thousand of books of reknowned writer. To maximize our profit by minimizing the loss with a limited production we applied operational strategy in our firm. In this term we analys productivity ratio, decision analysis, break even analysis, inventory management and quality management. So we have decorate our production with this common term of operations process by which we can identify how many books we should publish at a single time to ensure maximum profit with minimum loss. So let’s see how we start this process with operations management. Our first step was productivity ratio. With the help of productivity ratio we determine our labor productivity ratio and our multifactor productivity ratio. Productivity is an overall measure of the ability to produce a good or service. More specifically, productivity is the measure of how specified resources are managed to accomplish timely objectives as stated in terms of quantity and quality. Productivity may also be defined as an index that measures output (goods and services) relative to the input (labor, materials, energy, etc., used to produce the output). Hence, there are two major ways to increase productivity: increase the numerator (output) or decrease the denominator (input). Of course, a similar effect would be seen if both input and output increased, but output increased faster than input; or if input and output decreased, but input decreased faster than output. In there are 10 employees in our organization and they bind 2400 books in a week. They work 10 hours per day, 6days per week. Here the labor productivity ratio is: = Output Input = 2400 10 × (10 × 6hours per day) =4 In all writer pay $100 for each pair of books published. The government supplements press revenue by matching writer’s payment dollar for dollar. Organizations have many options for use of this formula, labor productivity, machine productivity, capital productivity, energy productivity, and so on. A productivity ratio may be computed for a single operation, a department, a facility, an organization, or even an entire country.

We have chosen our business as a press firm and whose name is

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Production & Operations Management Page 1

We have chosen our business as a press firm and whose name is . Every year

we publish thousand of books of reknowned writer. To maximize our profit by minimizing the

loss with a limited production we applied operational strategy in our firm. In this term we analys

productivity ratio, decision analysis, break even analysis, inventory management and quality

management.

So we have decorate our production with this common term of operations process by which we

can identify how many books we should publish at a single time to ensure maximum profit with

minimum loss.

So let’s see how we start this process with operations management.

Our first step was productivity ratio. With the help of productivity ratio we determine our labor

productivity ratio and our multifactor productivity ratio.

Productivity is an overall measure of the ability to produce a good or service. More specifically,

productivity is the measure of how specified resources are managed to accomplish timely

objectives as stated in terms of quantity and quality. Productivity may also be defined as an

index that measures output (goods and services) relative to the input (labor, materials, energy,

etc., used to produce the output).

Hence, there are two major ways to increase productivity: increase the numerator (output) or

decrease the denominator (input). Of course, a similar effect would be seen if both input and

output increased, but output increased faster than input; or if input and output decreased, but

input decreased faster than output.

In there are 10 employees in our organization and they bind 2400

books in a week. They work 10 hours per day, 6days per week.

Here the labor productivity ratio is:

=Output

Input

=2400

10 × (10 × 6hours per day)

= 4 𝑝𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟

In all writer pay $100 for each pair of books published. The

government supplements press revenue by matching writer’s payment dollar for dollar.

Organizations have many options for

use of this formula, labor productivity,

machine productivity, capital

productivity, energy productivity, and

so on. A productivity ratio may be

computed for a single operation, a

department, a facility, an organization,

or even an entire country.

Production & Operations Management Page 2

We offer all writer 3 pairs of books and we have 50 writers. Labor costs are $4000,

material costs are $20 per writer and overhead costs are $25000.

Here the productivity ratio is: A multifactor productivity measure utilizes more than a single

factor, for example, both labor and capital. Hence, multifactor productivity is the ratio of total

output to a subset of inputs.

=Output

Input

= 100 × 100 3 × 50

4000 + 20 × 50 + 25000

= 1

The second step we have taken in to make right decision. We went through

this process to select an optimal course of action from several alternatives where the outcome

associated with an action which is uncertain.

In this supplement we demonstrate a quantitative technique called decision analysis for decision-

making situations in which uncertainty exists. Decision analysis is a generic technique that can

be applied to a number of different types of operational decision-making areas.

A decision-making situation includes several components--the decisions themselves and the

events that may occur in the future, known as states of nature. Future states of nature may be

high demand or low demand for a product or good economic conditions or bad economic

conditions. At the time a decision is made, the decision maker is uncertain which state of nature

will occur in the future and has no control over these states of nature.

We analyzed ’s several alternatives in different ways and these are as follows:

Decision under the environment of certainty

Decision under the environment of risk

Decision under the environment of uncertainty

1. The first step in decision making we choose with Decision under the environment of

certainty. For the decision-making criteria we just used we assumed no available

information regarding the probability of the states of nature. However, it is often possible

for the decision maker to know enough about the future states of nature to assign

probabilities that each will occur, which is, decision making under conditions of risk.

Production & Operations Management Page 3

There are 3 ways to calculate decision making process under the environment of certainty and

these are as follows:

EMV(Expected Monetary Value)

EOL(Expected Opportunity Loss)

EVPI(Expected Value of Perfect Information)

So let’s see the anticipation through an illustration:

No of book copies sold

(in ten-thousand)

Probability

10 0.10

11 0.15

12 0.20

13 0.25

14 0.30

Cost of per copy is tk.30, sale price is tk.50. How many copies we should

publish we have to find it out.

So if we start with EMV our decision making process for stands with

as follows:

Possible

Demand

Probability Possible Stock Action

10 11 12 13 14

10

0.10 200 170 140 110 80

11

0.15 200 220 190 160 130

12

0.20 200 220 240 210 180

13

0.25 200 220 240 260 230

14

0.30 200 220 240 260 280

EMV=

200

215

222.5

220

205

Production & Operations Management Page 4

As the EMV is highest in 12(in ten thousand) copies of books will maximize monetary value

which is 222.5 (in millions), so we should go with this result.

The next step is to find out the EOL and after finding it out our decision is as follows:

Possible

Demand

Probability Possible Stock Action

10 11 12 13 14

10

0.10 0 30 60 90 120

11

0.15 20 0 30 60 90

12

0.20 40 20 0 30 60

13

0.25 60 40 20 0 30

14

0.30 80 60 40 20 0

EOL=

50

35

27.5

30

45

185

190

195

200

205

210

215

220

225

1 2 3 4 5

Production & Operations Management Page 5

EOL= Lij 𝑀𝑖𝑗 − 𝑀𝑖°

Hence publishing 12(in ten thousand) copies of books will minimize expected opportunity loss

of , which in tk27.5 (in millions).

The next and the last step of Decision making under certainty is EVPI. This EVPI will

help us by representing the maximum amount we would pay to get the additional

information on which may be based the decision alternative.

EVPI= EPPI – Max. EMV

= ∑𝑀𝑖°. 𝑃 𝑆𝑖 − 222.5

= 200(0.10) + 220(0.15) + 240(0.20) + 260(0.25) + 280(0.30) – 222.5

= 250 – 222.5

= 27.5

So here we identified our cost additional cost which was uncertain and with this anticipation we

are at the finishing line of Decision under certainty.

2. Here we will end our decision making process with the criteria of uncertainty.

Uncertainty and risk are not the same thing. Whereas uncertainty deals with possible

outcomes that are unknown, risk is a certain type of uncertainty that involves the real

possibility of loss.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1 2 3 4 5

Production & Operations Management Page 6

Uncertainty is a state of having limited knowledge of current conditions or future

outcomes. It is a major component of risk, which involves the likelihood and scale of

negative consequences. Managers often deal with uncertainty in their work; to minimize

the risk that their decisions will lead to undesired outcomes, they must develop the skills

and judgment necessary for reducing this uncertainty. Managing uncertainty and risk also

involves mitigating or even removing things that inhibit effective decision-making or

adversely affect performance.

One cause of uncertainty is proximity: things that are about to happen are easier to

estimate than those further out in the future. One approach to dealing with uncertainty is

to put off decisions until data become more accessible and reliable. Of course, delaying

some decisions can bring its own set of risks, especially when the potential negative

consequences of waiting are great.

Under uncertainty criteria we are going to discuss following process and these are as follows:

Maximax or optimistic

Maximin or pessimistic

Equally likely probability or Laplace

Minimax or regret

Hurwicz criterion

So let’s have a broad look how we anticipate these terms in .

The following matrix gives the payoff of different strategies (alternative) Rabindranath

Tagore, Kazi Nazrul Islam, Shimanto Deb against conditions (events) Loyalty,

Percentage, Copyright, others facilities.

Loyalty Percentage Copyright Others facilities

Rabindranath

Tagore

4000(in

thousands)

-100(in

Thousands)

6000(in

Thousands)

18000(in

Thousands)

Kazi Nazrul

Islam

20000(in

Thousands)

5000(in

Thousands)

400(in

Thousands)

0

(in Thousands)

Shimanto Deb

20000(in

Thousands)

15000(in

Thousands)

-2000(in

Thousands)

1000(in

Thousands)

Production & Operations Management Page 7

Now the decision taken under the following approaches:

Alternatives

Maximax Maximin Equal Likelihood

Rabindranath

Tagore

18000(in

Thousands)

-100(in

Thousands)

14 4000 − 100 + 6000

+ 18000 = 6975(in Thousands)

Kazi Nazrul Islam 20000(in

Thousands)

0 14 20000 + 5000 + 400 + 0

= 6350(in Thousands)

Shimanto Deb 20000(in

Thousands)

-2000(in

Thousands)

14 2000 + 15000 − 2000

+ 1000 = 8500(in Thousands)

a) Under Maximax or Optimistic criterion Kazi Nazrul Islam & Shimanto Deb is the

optimal act.

b) Under Maximin or Pessimistic criterion Kazi Nazrul Islam is the optimal act.

17000

17500

18000

18500

19000

19500

20000

20500

Tagore Nazrul Shimanto

Series1

-2500

-2000

-1500

-1000

-500

0

Tagore Nazrul Shimanto

Series1

Production & Operations Management Page 8

c) Under Equal likely-hood criterion Shimanto Deb is the optimal act.

Regret Table:

Loyalty Percentage Copyright Others

facilities

Maximum

Rabindranath

Tagore

16000

(in thousands)

15100

(in Thousands)

0

(in Thousands)

0

(in Thousands)

16000(In

Thousands)

18000(In

Thousands)

17000(In

Thousands)

Kazi Nazrul

Islam

0

(in Thousands)

10000

(in Thousands)

4600

(in Thousands)

18000

(in Thousands)

Shimanto Deb

0

(in Thousands)

0

(in Thousands)

8000

(in Thousands)

17000

(in Thousands)

Under Minimax or regret criterion Rabindranath Tagore is the optimal act.

15000

15500

16000

16500

17000

17500

18000

18500

Tagore Nazrul Shimanto

Series1

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

Tagore Nazrul Shimanto

Series1

Production & Operations Management Page 9

Hurwicz Criterion: Where, ∞ = 0.70

Alternatives

Maximax Maximin Payoff= ∞ 𝑴𝒂𝒙𝒊𝒎𝒖𝒎 + 𝟏 − ∞ (𝑴𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒎𝒖𝒎)

Rabindranath

Tagore

18000(in

Thousands)

-100(in

Thousands)

0.7 18000 + 0.3 −100

= 12570(in Thousands)

Kazi Nazrul Islam 20000(in

Thousands)

0 0.70 20000 + 0.30 0 = 14000(in Thousands)

Shimanto Deb 20000(in

Thousands)

-2000(in

Thousands)

0.7 2000 + 0.30 −2000 = 13400(in Thousands)

Under Hurwicz Criterion Kazi Nazrul Islam is the optimal act.

By doing this approaches we are done with our decision making process and we get our result

about cost, loss and profit. After the evaluation we can undoubtedly produce the necessary unit

by maintaining cost with ensuring maximum profit.

Hence we already done with decision making process so now it’s time to analyze the break point

so that we can anticipate our zero profit level of .

Break-even analysis is a technique widely used by production management and management

accountants. It is based on categorizing production costs between those which are "variable"

(costs that change when the production output changes) and those that are "fixed" (costs not

directly related to the volume of production).

11500

12000

12500

13000

13500

14000

14500

Tagore Nazrul Shimanto

Series1

Production & Operations Management Page 10

Total variable and fixed costs are compared with sales revenue in order to determine the level of

sales volume, sales value or production at which the business makes neither a profit nor a loss

(the "break-even point").

In its simplest form, the break-even chart is a graphical representation of costs at various levels

of activity shown on the same chart as the variation of income (or sales, revenue) with the same

variation in activity. The point at which neither profit nor loss is made is known as the "break-

even point" and is represented on the chart below by the intersection of the two lines:

In the diagram above, the line OA represents the variation of income at varying levels of

production activity ("output"). OB represents the total fixed costs in the business. As output

increases, variable costs are incurred, meaning that total costs (fixed + variable) also increase. At

low levels of output, Costs are greater than Income. At the point of intersection, P, costs are

exactly equal to income, and hence neither profit nor loss is made.

Fixed Costs

Fixed costs are those business costs that are not directly related to the level of production or

output. In other words, even if the business has a zero output or high output, the level of fixed

costs will remain broadly the same. In the long term fixed costs can alter - perhaps as a result of

investment in production capacity (e.g. adding a new factory unit) or through the growth in

overheads required to support a larger, more complex business.

Examples of fixed costs:

- Rent and rates

- Depreciation

- Research and development

Production & Operations Management Page 11

- Marketing costs (non- revenue related)

- Administration costs

Variable Costs

Variable costs are those costs which vary directly with the level of output. They represent

payment output-related inputs such as raw materials, direct labour, fuel and revenue-related costs

such as commission.

A distinction is often made between "Direct" variable costs and "Indirect" variable costs.

Direct variable costs are those which can be directly attributable to the production of a particular

product or service and allocated to a particular cost centre. Raw materials and the wages those

working on the production line are good examples.

Indirect variable costs cannot be directly attributable to production but they do vary with output.

These include depreciation maintenance and certain labor costs.

Here we represent our anticipation by an illustration, so let’s have a look on it.

is trying to determine how best to publish its e-book system. The e-

book could be published in our own press using either process A or process B. Cost data

are given bellow.

Fixed Cost

Variable Cost

Process A 15000

3

Process B 10000

5

Here,

Fa= 15000 Fb= 10000

Va= 3 Vb= 5

The break even quantity stands for

Vaq + Fa = Vbq + Fb

Vaq − Vbq = Fb − Fa

q Vb − Va = Fb − Fa

Production & Operations Management Page 12

q = Fb−Fa

(Va−Vb )

q = 10000−15000

3−5

q = 2500

Breakeven point analysis:

𝑉𝑎𝑞 + 𝐹𝑎

= 3 × 2500 + 15000

= 7500 + 15000

= 22500

𝑉𝑏𝑞 + 𝐹𝑏

= 5 × 2500 + 10000

= 12500 + 10000

= 22500

2500

22500

BEP

a b

Production & Operations Management Page 13

Here the breakeven cost is 22500 & the breakeven quantity is 2500.

Now it’s time to anticipate the inventory management in . So we have divided

our investigation in three approaches and these are as follows:

EOQ model with static demand

EOQ model with non instantaneous receipt

Quality discount with constant carrying cost

Economic order quantity (EOQ) is an equation for inventory that determines the ideal order

quantity a company should purchase for its inventory given a set cost of production, demand

rate and other variables. This is done to minimize variable inventory costs, and the formula

takes into account storage, or holding, costs, ordering costs and shortage costs. The full

equation is as follows:

2𝑘𝐷 ∕ ℎ

Where,

K = Ordering-costs

D = Demand

h = Holding-cost

Here,

Demand of books (D) = 50unit/day

Setup cost of books (k) = 20/order

Holding cost of books (h) = o.05/day

Lead time for publishing books = 7days

Le of publishing books = 3days

s EOQ are as follows:

i. Optimum order quantity (y) 2𝑘𝐷 ∕ ℎ

2 × 20 × 50 ∕ 0.05

200 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑠

ii. Associated cycle length (t𝑦

𝐷)

𝑦

𝐷

Production & Operations Management Page 14

=200

50

= 4 days

Since L>𝑦

𝐷, we have to determine effective lead time

Le = L – n. 𝑦

𝐷

= 7 - n× 4

= 7 – (1× 4)

= 7 – 4

= 3days

iii. Order 200 unit when ever inventory drops to

Le× 𝐷

=3× 50

= 150𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑠

iv. No of order =1

𝑡°

=1

4

= 0.25/𝑑𝑎𝑦𝑠

v. TCU 𝐾

𝐷+

ℎ𝑦

2

=20×50

200+

0.05×200

2

= $5 + $5

= $10.

The EOQ Model with Non instantaneous Receipt

A variation of the basic EOQ model is achieved when the assumption that orders are received all

at once is relaxed. This version of the EOQ model is known as the non instantaneous receipt

model also referred to as the gradual usage, or production lot size, model. In this EOQ variation,

the order quantity is received gradually over time and the inventory level is depleted at the same

time it is being replenished. This is a situation most commonly found when the inventory user is

also the producer, as, for example, in a manufacturing operation where a part is produced to use

in a larger assembly. This situation can also occur when orders are delivered gradually over time

or the retailer and producer of a product are one and the same.

Production & Operations Management Page 15

Relating these approaches to are as follows

Demand of (D) = 10000/year

Carrying Cost of (h) = 0.75/year

Ordering Cost of (K) = 150/order

Daily production (P) = 150/days

Daily demand (d) = 32.15/days

s EOQ are as follows:

i. Optimum order size (y) = 2𝑘𝐷 ℎ (1 −𝑑

𝑝)

= 2 × 150 × 10000 ∕ 0.75(1 −32.15

150)

= 2256.37

ii. TCU =𝐾𝐷

𝑦+

ℎ𝑦

2(1 −

𝑑

𝑝)

=150×10000

2256 .37+

𝑜 .75×2256.37

2(1 −

32.15

150)

=$664.78 + $664.78

= $1329.56

iii. The length of time to receive & order, production run:

=𝑦

𝑝

=2256.37

150

= 15.04

iv. Maximum inventory level = 𝑦(1 −𝑑

𝑝)

= 2256.37 −32.15

150

= 2256.16

Production & Operations Management Page 16

Quality discount with constant carrying cost

A quantity discount is a price discount on an item if predetermined numbers of units are ordered.

s Quantity Discount are as follows:

Quantity Price

1-49 $1400

50-89 $1100

90+ $900

Carrying cost for (h) = 190/year

Ordering cost (k) = 2500/order

Annual Demand (D) = 200/year

i. Optimum order size (y) = 2𝑘𝐷 ∕ ℎ

= 2 × 2500 × 200 ∕ 190 = 72.54𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑠

ii. TCU =𝐾𝐷

𝑦+

ℎ𝑦

2+ 𝑃𝐷

=2500×200

72.54+

190×72.54

2+ (1100 × 200)

= 233784

iii. TCU =𝐾𝐷

𝑦+

ℎ𝑦

2+ 𝑃𝐷

=2500×200

90+

190×90

2+ (900 × 200)

= 194105.56

With these activities we are done with our 90% calculation of operations. Now the last step left

and it is Quality management by which we can maintain a good quality product.

The starts publishing process with 100(in thousands) books each day. The

percentage of good books published each day average 80% & percentage of poor quality books

can be reworked is 50%. The company has a direct manufacturing cost of $30 per unit and

rework cost per unit in $12.

Let s find out the product yield and product cost of .

Production & Operations Management Page 17

Product Yield (Y) = (I) (%G) + (I) (1-%G) (%R)

= 100(0.80) + (100) (1-0.80) (0.50)

= 90

Product Cost = 𝐾𝐷 𝐼 + 𝐾𝑟 (𝑅)

𝑌

= 30 100 + 12 10

90

= 34.67

By anticipating quality management we are at the end of the research of this project. We have

identified different types of process to calculate the production process, inventory system,

product quality, breakeven point and how to ensure maximum profit with minimum loss.

The importance of operations management in any kind of business organization is known to all.

The companies that did not follow planning in the operations management were not able to

succeed as much as the companies that planned their operations and processes. The report takes

the example of Toyota Motor Corporation.

Toyota has been able to perform well as they have the most efficient process technology

planning, capacity management planning, lean production techniques, continuous improvement

strategies and supplier development techniques. The company would need to make some

changes in the materials-processing, information-processing, customer-processing and also in the

process technology related to volume and variety. The future outlook for the company appears o

be bright but the company would have to make the changes in the technologies accordingly.

Toyota appears to be the best possible example to demonstrate the operations management

techniques as they have mastered the art of using the space, the capacity and also providing the

highest possible quality.