Upload
msullman
View
134
Download
6
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Controlling for Self-reported Exposure in Traffic Accident Prediction Studies
Citation preview
Controlling for self-reported exposure in traffic accident prediction studies
Anders af Wåhlberg
Department of Psychology
Uppsala university
Exposure to risk of traffic accident
• As drivers drive, they expose themselves, and accident risk increases
Exposure to risk of traffic accident
• As drivers drive, they expose themselves, and accident risk increases
• When differences in accident record is predicted, what is it we predict?
Exposure to risk of traffic accident
• As drivers drive, they expose themselves, and accident risk increases
• When differences in accident record is predicted, what is it we predict?
• Accident proneness, exposure proneness, or both?
Exposure to risk of traffic accident
• As drivers drive, they expose themselves, and accident risk increases
• When differences in accident record is predicted, what is it we predict?
• Accident proneness, exposure proneness, or both?
• Most studies on accident record do not control for exposure beyond calender time
Exposure to risk of traffic accident
• Is exposure a mediator or a confounder?
Exposure to risk of traffic accident
• Is exposure a mediator or a confounder?
• If exposure does not correlate with the predictor, it is a confounder
Exposure to risk of traffic accident
• Is exposure a mediator or a confounder?
• If exposure does not correlate with the predictor, it is a confounder
• What psychological variables correlate with exposure?
Exposure to risk of traffic accident
• Is exposure a mediator or a confounder?
• If exposure does not correlate with the predictor, it is a confounder
• What psychological variables correlate with exposure?
• What is the difference if we control for exposure?
Self-reported exposure to risk of traffic accident
Self-reported exposure to risk of traffic accident
• Is self-reported mileage a mediator or a confounder?
Self-reported exposure to risk of traffic accident
• Is self-reported mileage a mediator or a confounder?
• Self-reported mileage is unreliable
Self-reported exposure to risk of traffic accident
• Is self-reported mileage a mediator or a confounder?
• Self-reported mileage is unreliable
• Self-report bias can create associations with other variables
Study: Controlling for self-reported mileageMethod
Study: Controlling for self-reported mileageMethod
• Samples: 4 (total N=24 016)
Study: Controlling for self-reported mileageMethod
• Samples: 4 (total N=24 016)
• Self-reported crashes and offences
Study: Controlling for self-reported mileageMethod
• Samples: 4 (total N=24 016)
• Self-reported crashes and offences
• Questionnaires scales: DAS, DBI, SSS, drugs, DBQ-V, DIM
Study: Controlling for self-reported mileageMethod
• Samples: 4 (total N=24 016)
• Self-reported crashes and offences
• Questionnaires scales: DAS, DBI, SSS, drugs, DBQ-V, DIM
• Analysis: Comparing zero-order and partial correlations between crashes/offences and scales, controlling for mileage
Study: Controlling for self-reported mileageResults
Study: Controlling for self-reported mileageResults
• 20% reduction in explained variance for crashes
Study: Controlling for self-reported mileageResults
• 20% reduction in explained variance for crashes
• 30% reduction in explained variance for offences
Conclusions
Conclusions
• There is a strong effect of exposure on crash prediction in self-reported data
Conclusions
• There is a strong effect of exposure on crash prediction in self-reported data
• Most studies on accident prediction use self-reported data
Conclusions
• There is a strong effect of exposure on crash prediction in self-reported data
• Most studies on accident prediction use self-reported data
• Few accident prediction studies control for exposure beyond calender time
Conclusions
• There is a strong effect of exposure on crash prediction in self-reported data
• Most studies on accident prediction use self-reported data
• Few accident prediction studies control for exposure beyond calender time
• Therefore; effect sizes have been over-estimated for many variables
Thank you for your attention
Anders af Wåhlberg
Department of Psychology
Uppsala university