39
WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED SO FAR • UNDERSTANDING AND INSIGHT • Retention • Understanding relationships • Wider application of knowledge

Training and development

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  1. 1. WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED SO FAR UNDERSTANDING AND INSIGHT Retention Understanding relationships Wider application of knowledge
  2. 2. WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED SO FAR RULES OF ASSOCIATION Repetition-simple associations like company policies, H&S etc. Attention and intention are critical Whole learning is generally preferred over part learning Feedback is essential Cause and effect relationships can add meaning. Active learning with passive learning
  3. 3. SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISIM We learn as a community.we agree upon certain meanings of language, symbols, beliefs etc. A social construction of color PINK Collectively held beliefs-National and organizational culture, sequencing, generational sensitivities and methodologies.
  4. 4. PEDAGOGY Trainer centered & Subject centered Trainees are passive, inert, uniform Lectures & one way inputregimentation, learners experience not realized JUG & MUG; New situations e.g. Induction Policies & Procedures Health & Safety
  5. 5. ANDRAGOGY ASSUMPTION by definition an adult is someone who has achieved the self concept of being responsible for his/her own life
  6. 6. MALCOM KNOWLES 4 ASSUMPTIONS 1. People learn when they feel that they need to learn 2. Self directed 3. Prior Experience 4. Desire to develop competencymotivation
  7. 7. SOME INITIAL RULES!!!!! Physical environment Psychological environment Self Diagnosis Mutual Responsibility Importance of Collaboration
  8. 8. 3 STEPS!!!!!! COMPETITION CO OPERATION COLLABORATION
  9. 9. Kolbs Learning Styles Theory Some KLPs DIVERGING (CE/RO); See things from various angles Problem solving in teams HR managers, artists, historians ASSIMILATING (RO/AC); Less concerned with people & more with ideas.Lectures, readings, graphs Pure scientists, mathematicians, R & D
  10. 10. Kolbs Learning Styles Theory CONVERGING(AC/AE); Finding practical use of theories High instrumentality, case studies Applied scientists, engineers, lawyers ACCOMODATING(AE/CE); Intuition not logic Team players, risk takers Achieving objectives in a team Teachers , Marketing
  11. 11. One size fits all? PROFESSION IS ONE KEY Self-Awareness Holistic Approach Chasing in the cycle?
  12. 12. Honey and Mumford Learning Styles ACTIVIST--- Do not like listening, thrown into deep end REFLECTOR Like to listen THEORIST--- Do not like subjectivity, like patterns and charts PRAGMATIST- --Practical pay off
  13. 13. VISUAL: I see what you mean AUDITORY: I hear what you mean KINESTHETIC: I get a feel of what you mean
  14. 14. CRITICISM If the criticism is true you need to look towards your content
  15. 15. HOWARD GARDNER: MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES Verbal- Linguistic: lectures, reading materials Bodily Kinesthetic: role plays, physical activity Logical- Mathematical: graphs, flow charts Musical Rhythmic: videos Visual Spatial: draw pictures, maps, videos Interpersonal: group projects Intrapersonal
  16. 16. Anxiety, Fear Building efficacy Avoid comparisons Avoid guilt Feedback
  17. 17. Some Exceptions Socio legal issues- sexual harassment, equal opportunity, Diversity, Health & Safety KLP- if it is reactive you are in trouble Change BPR, new equipment, new values
  18. 18. TNA- KEY TERMS PERFORMANCE DISCREPENCY CAUSES TARGET GROUP LINE BUY IN ASSUMPTIONS
  19. 19. WHAT IS THE RESULT? Effective utilization of training, time and $$$ (performance improvement) Motivation Benchmark for evaluation of training effectiveness KLP- a good TNA ensures that training is given on job related KSAs AND only those who need the training are included
  20. 20. Arrange formal training Arrange practice Arrange feedback Ignore it Is it Important?? Is it caused by skills deficiency Is performance of skills punishing to employee? In non performance Rewarding? Does performance matter? R there obstacles to performance Employee exhibited skills in past? Is the skills used often Remove punishment Arrange +ive consequence 4 performance Arrange consequence Remove obstacles Yes No Performance discrepancy
  21. 21. Organizational Analysis Organization strategy, goals and mission Overall discrepancies Mission as a context- Our mission is to continually improve our products and services to meet our customers needs, allowing us to prosper as a business and provide a reasonable return to our stockholders Ford Prioritization
  22. 22. Organizational Analysis Core Values, Employer Branding, Employee value proposition Establish how far the core values of the organization support the creation of an attractive brand and ensure that these are incorporated in the presentation of the brand as long as they are values in use (lived by members of the organization)rather than simply espoused
  23. 23. Organizational Analysis Organizational Climate Structure, job design, policies and procedures, performance management & CULTURE Grievances, Exit interviews, Surveys KLP- Incongruities must be corrected
  24. 24. Organizational Analysis Human Resource Planning Retirements, Succession Planning, New Hires Talent Inventory TNA Business strategy Heinz Canadas Leamington Plant
  25. 25. Task Analysis/Job Analysis Content tasks, duties, responsibilities, Key dimensions or result areas ( Importance, level of difficulty, consequences of error) Contextual factors KSAs required Many methods e.g. CIT
  26. 26. Lets Do It One key result area in the job of a manager is Getting results in teams Identify the KSAs ???
  27. 27. Competency Modeling What is a COMPETENCY? Generalizibility Changing nature of jobs (From jobs to roles) A people orientation Training based only on task analysis can be quickly outdated
  28. 28. Changing Nature of Work To be able to work in teams, to rotate through various jobs, to understand how their task fit into the entire process, to spot problems in production, to troubleshoot, articulate problems to others, suggest improvements, and write detailed charts that serve as a road map in the assembly of the car JD of assembly line worker at Mazda, Flat Rock, Michigan Plant
  29. 29. Competency Modeling How to do it? One of the key result areas for a divisional HR director might be human resource planning, defined as: Prepares forecasts of human resource requirements and plans for the acquisition ,retention and effective utilization of employees, which ensure that the companys needs for people are met. The positive indicators for this competence area could include:
  30. 30. Competency Modeling How to do it? Seeks involvement in business strategy formulation; Contributes to business planning by taking a strategic view of longer-term human resource issues that are likely to affect business strategy; Networks with senior management colleagues to understand and respond to the human resource planning issues they raise; Suggests practical ways to improve the use of human resources, for example the introduction of annual hours.
  31. 31. Competency Modeling How to do it? Negative indicators could include: Takes a narrow view of HR planning does not seem to be interested in or understand the wider business context; lacks the determination to overcome problems and deliver forecasts; Fails to anticipate skills shortages, for example unable to meet the multiskilling requirements implicit in the new computer integrated manufacturing system; Does not seem to talk the same language as line management colleagues fails to understand their requirements; Slow in responding to requests for help.
  32. 32. Competency Modeling How to do it? When the positive and negative indicators have been agreed the next step is to distil the competency dimensions that can be inferred from the lists. In this example they could be: Strategic capability Business understanding Achievement motivation Interpersonal skills Communication skills
  33. 33. Person Analysis Performance Appraisal- AP Performance Standard- EP- means & ends & core values ISSUES WITH APPRAISALS: Human subjectivity Motivation of the appraiser Defensiveness (SEPARATE APPRAISAL FOR TNA) You know what are the key result areas, competencies, KSAs so now you want to see who is not meeting the expectations
  34. 34. Person Analysis- Getting it Right 360 feedback, Self appraisal Ask questions such as: How well do you feel you have done? What do you feel are your strengths? What do you like most/least about your job? Why do you think that project went well? Why do you think you didnt meet that target? Always refer to actual events or behavior and to results compared with agreed performance measures
  35. 35. Person Analysis- Getting it Right It is necessary first to identify any causes that are external to the job and outside the control of either the manager or the individual. Any factors that are within the control of the individual and/or the manager can then be considered. What needs to be determined is the extent to which the reason for the problem is because the individual: did not receive adequate support or guidance from his or her manager; did not fully understand what he or she was expected to do; could not do it ability; did not know how to do it skill; would not do it attitude.
  36. 36. Person Analysis- Getting it Right Seems pretty straight forward then why it is not done??????? A culture that supports this type of approach to appraisal Top management support PD- employer and management are both accountable. In fact, one can argue that it is unlikely to emerge if people are effectively managed There are no bad soldiers, only bad officers
  37. 37. Results of Person Analysis