26
STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION A Department of Defense Perspective Robert T. Hastings Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs (acting) 2008-2009

Strategic Communication: A Department of Defense Perspective. Robert Hastings

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation by Robert Hastings, former Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs, at Leeds University for the European PR Education and Research Association annual congress.

Citation preview

Page 1: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

STRATEGIC

COMMUNICATION

A Department of Defense Perspective

Robert T. HastingsAssistant Secretary of Defense

for Public Affairs (acting)2008-2009

Page 2: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings
Page 3: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings
Page 4: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings
Page 5: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings
Page 6: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

Strategic CommunicationThe Information Environment is Changing…… Every Day

Page 7: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings
Page 8: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

Strategic Communication

“To succeed, we must understand the United States is engaged in a generational and global struggle about ideas, not a war between the West and Islam. It is more than a war against the tactics of terrorism. We must think in terms of global networks, both government and non-government. If we continue to concentrate primarily on states ([i.e.,] 'getting it right' in Iraq, managing the next state conflict better), we will fail.

Strategic communications require sophisticated methods that map perceptions and influence networks, identify priorities, formulate objectives, develop themes and messages, leverage new strategic and tactical dynamics and, ultimately, monitor success.”

Dr. William SchneiderChairman, Defense Science Board

Page 9: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Strategic Communication; 2004

QDR Strategic Communication Execution Roadmap; 2006U.S. National Strategy for Public Diplomacy and Strategic

Communication; 2007DoD Principles of Strategic Communication; 2008DoD Strategic Communication Joint Integrating Concept; 2009DoD Report on Strategic Communication; 2009USG National Framework for Strategic Communication; 2010

US Strategic Communication Roadmap

Page 10: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

A key lesson from previous DoD efforts to conceptualize and organize for effective strategic communication is that processes intended to develop separate and distinct strategic communication priorities, plans, or organizations are ineffective when divorced from other planning processes.

Some in DoD are increasingly using the term "strategic engagement and communication" instead of the term "strategic communication," as the latter term is often misinterpreted to imply a narrower concern with media, messaging, and traditional "communications" activities.

Department of DefenseReport on Strategic Communication

December 2009

Strategic Communication

Page 11: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

DoD Principles of Strategic Communication

Principles of Strategic Communication

Page 12: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

Strategic Communication….

The synchronization of actions, images, and words to achieve a desired effect.

Principles of Strategic Communication

Page 13: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

Leadership-Driven. Leaders must decisively engage and drive the Strategic Communication process.

Credible. Perception of truthfulness and respect between all parties.

Principles of Strategic Communication

Page 14: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

Understanding. Deep comprehension of attitudes, cultures, identities, behavior, history, perspectives and social systems.

Dialogue. Multi-faceted exchange of ideas to promote understanding and build relationships.

Principles of Strategic Communication

Page 15: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

Pervasive. Every action, image, and word sends a message.

Unity of Effort. Integrated and coordinated, vertically and horizontally.

Results-Based. Actions to achieve specific outcomes in pursuit of a well-articulated endstate.

Principles of Strategic Communication

Page 16: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

Responsive. Right audience, right message, right time, and right place.

Continuous. Diligent ongoing research, analysis, planning, execution, and assessment that feeds planning and action.

Principles of Strategic Communication

Page 17: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

The strategic communication process is designed to synchronize - and thus maximize the impact of - efforts to achieve one or more of the following:

Improve U.S. credibility and legitimacy;Weaken an adversary's credibility and legitimacy;Convince selected audiences to take specific actions

that support U.S. or international objectives;Cause a competitor or adversary to take (or refrain

from taking) specific actions.

Strategic Communication Joint Integrating Concept; 2009

Strategic Communication

Page 18: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

Four instruments used to deliver Strategic Communication:Public diplomacy; activities that seek through the exchange of

people and ideas to build lasting relationships and receptivity to a nation’s culture, values, and policies.

Public affairs; communication activities intended primarily to inform and influence audiences through news media and public information.

International broadcasting services: funded government programs to transmit news, information, public affairs programs, and entertainment to global audiences via a variety of means.

Information operations; associated military activities which include computer network operations, electronic warfare, operational security, military deception, and PSYOP.5

Strategic Communication Joint Integrating Concept; 2009

Strategic Communication

Page 19: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

Gentle/Indirect Forceful/Direct

Inform Educate Influence/Advocate Induce/Coerce

PSYOPS

The Information Spectrum

MILDEC

Info OperationsPSYOPS

Public Diplomacy Public DiplomacyPublic Affairs

Page 20: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

Strategic Communication

“Strategic communication should be an enabling function that guides and informs our decisions and not an organization unto itself. Rather than trying to capture all communication activity underneath it, we should use it to describe the process by which we integrate and coordinate.

To put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate. I also hope we learn to be more humble, to listen more. Because what we are after in the end—or should be after—are actions that speak for themselves, that speak for us. What we need more than anything is credibility.

And we can’t get that in a talking point.” 

Admiral Mike MullenChairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff

Page 21: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

US Government DefinitionThe synchronization of words and deeds with active consideration of how they will be perceived by selected audiences;Programs and activities deliberately aimed at communicating and engaging with intended audiences, including those implemented by public affairs, public diplomacy, and information operations professionals.

National Framework for Strategic Communication March 2010

Strategic Communication

Page 22: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT INTEGRATED CIVILIAN-MILITARY CAMPAIGN PLAN

FOR SUPPORT TO AFGHANISTAN

“USG efforts must focus on the people of Afghanistan. Our every action must help secure, mobilize and support the Afghan people and their government to defeat the insurgency and establish effective governance.”

Strategic Communication

Page 23: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

The objectives of ISAF Strategic Communication plan are to:Build and strengthen public confidence in Afghan institutions.Maintain Afghan public support for ISAF.Improve commitment and responsiveness of GIRoA to Afghan

public.Maintain and strengthen public support of contributing nations’

domestic audiences for the mission.Undermine support for the insurgency (and other threats to

stability).Encourage acceptance and cooperation across the Afghan

neighborhood for the mission.

Strategic Communication

Page 24: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings
Page 25: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

Lessons Learned………• Credibility and legitimacy are paramount• Media isn't the only thing, but it’s everything• Imagery wins• Speed counts• Messages must be simple and memorable• Opinions are shaped by engagement• Listening is as important as talking• Use every channel• Research and measurement are essential• Communication strategy must be embedded in national strategy• Be prepared for “casualties”

Strategic Communication

Page 26: Strategic Communication:  A Department of Defense Perspective.  Robert Hastings

Principles of Strategic Communication

Robert [email protected].

“The newest computer can merely compound, at speed, the oldest problem in the relations between human beings, and in the end the communicator will be confronted with the old problem, of what to say and how to say it.”

Edward R. Murrow