Upload
nas-psu
View
134
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Mike Cronin716-479-2722
Zach Fidurko716-378-5970
Pure Energy Consultants, LLC
Matt Minemier814-222-1854
Naser Saleh814-441-1599
Field Development Plan of Texas Creek Oriskany Sandstone
Client: Shell (Fm. East Resources)Date: 7 April 2011
Introduction
• Deliverables:1) Reservoir Characterization2) Reservoir Development Options w/ Economics
• Findings:1) OGIP = 5.8 Bscf2) Economics - Gas Price ($4/Mscf)
• Gas Storage Infeasible• Infill Drilling Sub-Economic
3) Recommend Depleting Field to 500psi with Existing Wells.
Reservoir Characterization
Structure Map with Water Saturation: Looking NW
-OGIP = 5.8 Bscf-Swcon = 25%-Thickness = 30ft-Net Pay = 15ft-Porosity = 5%-GWC at 6200ft
History Match
History Match
-200000
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
1600000
1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/2011
Cu
mu
lati
ve P
rod
uct
ion
(M
Msc
f)
Time (Days)
Graham 2
Graham 2
Modeled
-2000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/2011
Dai
ly P
rod
uct
ion
(m
scf)
Time (Days)
Graham 2
Historical
Modeled
• Cumulative Gas Produced vs. Time
• Daily Gas Produced vs. Time
Development Options
1) Production to Abandonment-Add Wells
-No Additional Wells
2) Gas Storage
Abandonment Strategy
For P abandonment of 500psi:
1) Addition of One Well (Two Test Locations)
VS
2) Produce Existing Wells Until Depleted
TW-1
Incremental Economics TW-1TW- 1
• Gas produced 4.31 BCF
• Recovery Factor 74 %• At $4 Mscf additional
revenue will equal $1.8 million
• Cost to Drill Well (from East AFE) $ 1.3 million
• NPV @ 10 % give $-325,946
• ROR equals 3.3 %
NPV=Net Present ValueROR=Rate of Return
TW-2
Incremental Economics TW-2TW- 2
• Gas produced 4.28 BCF
• Recovery Factor 73%• At $4 Mscf additional
revenue will equal $1.68 million
• Cost to Drill Well (from East AFE) $ 1.3 million
• NPV @ 10 % give $-355,968
• ROR equals 3.2 %
NPV=Net Present ValueROR=Rate of Return
Economics of Abandonment
• Plan Produce Original Three Wells to Abandonment Pressure (500 psi)
• Abandonment Date
• Total Gas Produced BCF
• At $4 Mscf
- Producing to Abandonment
- Stopping Production @ 1000 psi for injection
Gas Storage Strategy
Np, Pressures at inject
-Burst pressure (FG work)
Working Gas: OGIP-Np = 5.8-3.9 = 1.9 Bscf
No new wells, convert existing wells to injectors
-6month injection/production cycling
Gas Storage Results
• Losing X % per cycle
• -(Storage Cost + Summer Buy Price)*Vinj
• + (Winter Sell Price)*Vprod
• -12.5% *Value of Unproduced Accessible Gas
Economics
-1.00E+09
0.00E+00
1.00E+09
2.00E+09
3.00E+09
4.00E+09
5.00E+09
6.00E+09
12/27/2014 5/10/2016 9/22/2017 2/4/2019 6/18/2020 10/31/2021
Cu
mu
lati
ve G
as S
C (
ft^3
)
Date
at t=0 Gas Produced vs. Injected Produced
Production
Injection
Economics
Summer Price $3.75
Winter Price $4.75
Economics
Cycle Money loss
1 -7.67E+06
2 -8.90E+06
3 -9.20E+06
4 -9.07E+06
Cycle Gas loss (ft3)
1 1.90E+09
2 2.27E+09
3 2.44E+09
4 2.52E+09
Cycle % Gas Loss (ft3)
1 14.98537127
2 28.18611201
3 39.47369726
4 48.29953467
Conclusions
-OGIP:
-Reserves:
-Abandonment Economics
-Gas Storage Economics
Questions
Support Slides
Delciotto 2 History Match
-200000
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
1600000
1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/2011
Cu
mu
lati
ve P
rod
uct
ion
(M
Msc
f)
Time (Days)
Delciotto 2
Historical
CMG
-2000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/2011
Dai
ly P
rod
uct
ion
(m
scf)
Time (Days)
Delciotto 2
Del 2 Hist
CMG
Delciotto 1 History Match
-50000
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/2011
Cu
mu
lati
ve P
rod
uct
ion
(M
Msc
f)
Time (Days)
Delciotto 1
CMG
Historical
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/2011
Dai
ly P
rod
uct
ion
(m
scf)
Time (Days)
Delciotto 1
Del 1
CMG
Graham 2 History Match
-200000
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
1600000
1/22/20103/13/20105/2/20106/21/20108/10/20109/29/201011/18/20101/7/20112/26/2011
Graham 2
Graham 2
Modeled
-2000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
1/22/20103/13/2010 5/2/2010 6/21/20108/10/20109/29/201011/18/20101/7/2011 2/26/2011
Graham 2
Historical
Modeled
Pure Energy Consultants, LLC
• Gas Produced 3.86 BCF
• Recovery Factor67%
• With no additional Wells
Pure Energy Consultants, LLC