25
Mike Cronin 716-479-2722 [email protected] Zach Fidurko 716-378-5970 [email protected] Pure Energy Consultants, LLC Matt Minemier 814-222-1854 [email protected] Naser Saleh 814-441-1599 [email protected] Field Development Plan of Texas Creek Oriskany Sandstone Client: Shell (Fm. East Resources) Date: 7 April 2011

Png 492 pec final-presentation

  • Upload
    nas-psu

  • View
    291

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 2: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Introduction

• Deliverables:1) Reservoir Characterization2) Reservoir Development Options w/ Economics

• Findings:1) OGIP = 5.8 Bscf2) Economics - Gas Price ($4/Mscf)

• Gas Storage Infeasible• Infill Drilling Sub-Economic

3) Recommend Depleting Field to 500psi with Existing Wells.

Page 3: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Reservoir Characterization

Structure Map with Water Saturation: Looking NW

-OGIP = 5.8 Bscf-Swcon = 25%-Thickness = 30ft-Net Pay = 15ft-Porosity = 5%-GWC at 6200ft

Page 4: Png 492  pec final-presentation

History Match

Page 5: Png 492  pec final-presentation

History Match

1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/20110

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1400000

1600000 Graham 2

Graham 2Modeled

Time (Days)

Cum

ulati

ve P

rodu

ction

(MM

scf)

1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/20110

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000 Graham 2

HistoricalModeled

Time (Days)

Dai

ly P

rodu

ction

(msc

f)

• Cumulative Gas Produced vs. Time

• Daily Gas Produced vs. Time

Page 6: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Development Options

1) Production to Abandonment-Add Wells-No Additional Wells

2) Gas Storage

Page 7: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Abandonment StrategyFor P abandonment of 500psi:

1) Addition of One Well (Two Test Locations) VS

2) Produce Existing Wells Until Depleted

Page 8: Png 492  pec final-presentation

TW-1

Page 9: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Incremental Economics TW-1TW- 1

• Gas produced 4.31 BCF

• Recovery Factor 74 %• At $4 Mscf additional

revenue will equal $1.8 million

• Cost to Drill Well (from East AFE) $ 1.3 million

• NPV @ 10 % give $-325,946

• ROR equals 3.3 %

NPV=Net Present ValueROR=Rate of Return

Page 10: Png 492  pec final-presentation

TW-2

Page 11: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Incremental Economics TW-2TW- 2

• Gas produced 4.28 BCF

• Recovery Factor 73%• At $4 Mscf additional

revenue will equal $1.68 million

• Cost to Drill Well (from East AFE) $ 1.3 million

• NPV @ 10 % give $-355,968

• ROR equals 3.2 %

NPV=Net Present ValueROR=Rate of Return

Page 12: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Economics of Abandonment• Plan Produce Original Three Wells to Abandonment

Pressure (500 psi)• Abandonment Date • Total Gas Produced BCF • At $4 Mscf - Producing to Abandonment

- Stopping Production @ 1000 psi for injection

Page 13: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Gas Storage StrategyNp, Pressures at inject-Burst pressure (FG work)

Working Gas: OGIP-Np = 5.8-3.9 = 1.9 Bscf

No new wells, convert existing wells to injectors

-6month injection/production cycling

Page 14: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Gas Storage Results

• Losing X % per cycle

• -(Storage Cost + Summer Buy Price)*Vinj• + (Winter Sell Price)*Vprod• -12.5% *Value of Unproduced Accessible Gas

Page 15: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Economics

12/27/2014 5/10/2016 9/22/2017 2/4/2019 6/18/2020 10/31/20210.00E+00

1.00E+09

2.00E+09

3.00E+09

4.00E+09

5.00E+09

6.00E+09

at t=0 Gas Produced vs. Injected Produced

ProductionInjection

Date

Cum

ulati

ve G

as S

C (ft

^3)

Page 16: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Economics

Summer Price $3.75Winter Price $4.75

Page 17: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Economics

Cycle Money loss

1 -7.67E+06

2 -8.90E+06

3 -9.20E+06

4 -9.07E+06

Cycle Gas loss (ft3)

1 1.90E+09

2 2.27E+09

3 2.44E+09

4 2.52E+09

Cycle % Gas Loss (ft3)

1 14.98537127

2 28.18611201

3 39.47369726

4 48.29953467

Page 18: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Conclusions

-OGIP:-Reserves:

-Abandonment Economics

-Gas Storage Economics

Page 19: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Questions

Page 20: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Support Slides

Page 21: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Delciotto 2 History Match

1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/20110

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000 Delciotto 2

HistoricalCMG

Time (Days)

Cum

ulati

ve P

rodu

ction

(MM

scf)

1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/20110

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000 Delciotto 2

Del 2 HistCMG

Time (Days)

Dai

ly P

rodu

ction

(msc

f)

Page 22: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Delciotto 1 History Match

1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/20110

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000 Delciotto 1

CMG Historical

Time (Days)

Cum

ulati

ve P

rodu

ction

(MM

scf)

1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/20110

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000 Delciotto 1

Del 1CMG

Time (Days)

Dai

ly P

rodu

ction

(msc

f)

Page 23: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Graham 2 History Match

1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/20110

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1400000

1600000 Graham 2

Graham 2Modeled

1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/20110

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000 Graham 2

HistoricalModeled

Page 24: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Pure Energy Consultants, LLC

• Gas Produced 3.86 BCF• Recovery Factor 67%• With no

additional Wells

Page 25: Png 492  pec final-presentation

Pure Energy Consultants, LLC