79
Martin Kime GLWPE Long Wall Conference Monday 14 th of October Metropolitan Replacement Long Wall Installation and Innovation

Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Martin Kime, Group Long Wall Projects and Automation Engineer, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy delivered this presentation at the 2013 Longwall Conference. Longwall Conference is the optimal place for the industry to come together to discuss the latest advances in the industry, swap experiences and learn from the best operators in the business. For more information, please visit: http://www.longwallconference.com.au/2013

Citation preview

Page 1: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Martin Kime

GLWPE

Long Wall Conference

Monday 14th of October

Metropolitan Replacement Long Wall

Installation and Innovation

Page 2: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

2

Metropolitan Mine Background

• Operations constrained by geography & the vintage of

facilities - located in residential area

• Large Central Lease (60Mt) area has remained

unmined due to geological features restricting access

• Central Lease Area development (Part 3 Approved),

provides opportunity to continue mining & expand

• Metropolitan Colliery is located in the Southern Coal fields of New South Wales,

Australia

• Production

began in

1888 at

Metropolitan

Mine and

has operated

for 125 years

Page 3: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Metropolitan Mine Plan

3

● Most of future mining

under Sydney Catchment

Authority

● New JOY Longwall Mining

equipment will commence

within the Reservoir

Notification Area (LW 23a)

● Metropolitan Exports

Metallurgical coal via Port

Kembla

● Currently mining LW22b

Page 4: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Stables

Page 5: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Pre 1950

Page 6: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Mine site

6

Page 7: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Proximity to township of Helensburgh

7

Page 8: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Southern Coal Fields – New South Wales

8

Page 9: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Metropolitan Project

● Metropolitan gained Peabody capital approval to

undertake modernization of its infrastructure and to

increase production capacity. The project focused on 7

elements to modernization. Todays presentation will

focus on

– the replacement of the existing Longwall with a JOY state of the

art Long wall,

– safety initiatives

– engineering design and functionality improvements.

– delay in drift completion and alternate transportation

arrangements and engineering challenges

9

Page 10: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Replacement Long wall

● The replacement Long wall was to be transported via the

new drift as part of the Metropolitan expansion project

● JOY were successful in winning the Turn Key contract to

manufacture and supply

– 89 1.75m roof supports (Alternate testing Protocol used)

– AFC and BSL

– 7LS2a Shearer (Landmark, cowl less)

– Macquarie Manufacturing Monorail

– Inhoxihp pump station - monorail mounted

– Ampcontrol Electrics and lighting system

10

Page 11: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Innovations

11

Page 12: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Man Down Technology

● The Metropolitan Contract was specific in relation to the

man down protection in the shearer controller and

required JOY to supply shearer remotes with the

technology.

● During the process Metropolitan drove the compliance to

Australian standards and required functionality between

the remote, shearer and roof supports.

● Final product is a credit to JOY and the Project Team

12

Page 13: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

UPS backed Lighting

● Project team wanted to improve the lighting in and

around the longwall during maintenance periods and

loss of power events.

● A plan was developed to utilize Led lights supplied from

Uninterruptable Power supplies from the TG roof

supports to MG Corner and MG Corner to the Freek

Station (First Response Emergency Evacuation Kit)

(CABA)

● Each UPS supplies 4 Led lights for approximately 10

hours operation. Benefits

– In the event of emergency Lighting will remain on

– Permanent lighting during Maintenance activities

– Permanent lighting during breakdowns

13

Page 14: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Outbye lighting layout – 41 ups supplied lights between sub and MG, UPS backed light on every roof support

14

Page 15: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Roof support Testing Protocol

● Pat Solars Twenty Mile underground General Manager developed a

strenuous testing protocol after dealing with significant engineering

failures of Twenty mile roof support bases.

● The testing protocol was focused around the inclusion of blocks to

simulate the maximum amount of transverse and longitudinal

camber (manufacturing tolerances) allowed by the OEM during

manufacture of the base and canopy. The testing cycles were also

increased to 70105 cycles.

● The Metropolitan roof support was designed and manufactured to

meet the stringent testing protocol.

● The roof support passed the testing protocol with minor issues

during testing; 90k cycles were completed without a failure that

would result in the roof support experiencing a catastrophic failure

over its intended design life.

15

Page 16: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Testing Requirments

16

Page 17: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Roof support Tip Pressure

● Metropolitan currently run combination of 1.5m Metropolitan shields

and 1.75 ex Shoeshone shields.

● The existing shields are rated at approximately 800t and

Metropolitan do have significant strata issues due to the lack of

support density the shields are providing

● The opportunity to increase the roof support density was a welcome

relief; the roof supports were specified to provide

Yield – >115t/m2 before the cut;

● During Front End Engineering it was identified that the Gate End

roof support density had decreased from the 115t/m2 required.

● The project team provided guidance and instruction to add an

additional Compensating cylinder on the gate end supports, this

increased the tip pressure from <12t/m2 to >20tm2 and allow the

gate end supports to meet the contracted rate of 115t/m2

17

Page 18: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Double Compensation cylinder – gate end

18

Page 19: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Transportation of the New Longwall

● The expansion project at Metropolitan included the excavation of a

new Man, Material and belt access Drift. This was to be the

transport route to the underground workings for the new longwall.

● The drift project was post poned at the 562m mark until further

notice.

● A detailed analysis of the available options to transport the LW

underground was conducted; identifying 7 possible opportunities

● The safest, Cost effective and least disruptive to the day to day

operations was to transport the new long wall via the existing man

and materials winder.

● The following slides identify safety, productivity and engineering

challenges to transporting the long wall undergound via the man and

materials winder.

19

Page 20: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Man and Material Winder

● The second hand man and material winder was installed

at Metropolitan in 1954, it is currently running under and

exemption from the NSW Department.

● Peabody Energy has committed to the purchase of a

new winder to replace the aging plant.

Challenges

● Remediation work Rail line

● Winder access dimensions

20

Page 21: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Current Risks

LONGWALL

Issue

• Maintaining schedule of longwall equipment transport over and above regular operational

activities

Mitigation

• Weekly operational transportation meeting to focus on objectives

• Underground track repairs completed

• Specialist transportation equipment manufactured for ease of haulage. Low loader

successfully run into mine with PRS base

• Just in time delivery of equipment to surface to lessen burden on yard

21

Page 22: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Rail Remediation work – replacement of old rail.

● Track being broken up ready to lift

22

Page 23: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Each old rail was lifted and replaced

Page 24: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Broken end found during remediation work

Page 25: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Track being reinstalled with new sleepers

Page 26: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Track being ballasted

Page 27: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Winder Window

● The winder portal has height, width, length and weight

limitations

● Due to the limitations of the portal an analysis of the new

long wall equipment was completed identifying the plant

that would be required to be modified, disassembled, or

built underground.

● Equipment in Orange has been modified

27

Page 28: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Winder Window

28

Page 29: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Analysis

New Joy Longwall dimensions and weight QTY Description Length Width Height Weight Comments Action

AFC 80 Pan 1.75 2 1.25 3 OK N/A

1 M/G croner 3.7 3.6 1.55 30 Won't fit in current drift, this item does not lend itself to being cut down Re-engineered and costed

1 T/G tensioner 6.1 3.15 1.1 20 Won't fit in current drift, Base plate to be cut in half, and re attached U/G Re-engineered and costed

1 Ramp pan 4.3 3.1 1.55 12

Won't fit in current drift, could possibly be cut down, have not fully discussed with Joy this option, could be be modified to be half width and either be bolted or pinned together, extra cost Re-engineered and costed

5 Re-router pan 3.6 3.1 1.25 10

Won't fit in current drift, could possibly be cut down, have not fully discussed with Joy this option, could be be modified to be half width and either be bolted or pinned together, extra cost Re-engineered and costed

8 Chain bin 5 1.4 1.8 8

Approximate values Would need to have special bins made up, and then would need to look at handling options with longer lower bins, what machines do we have to this with. Maybe a low loader flat top Re-engineering Required

29

Page 30: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Analysis Cont

BSL 1 Ramp pan OK

1 Crusher 4 2.8 1.9 Ok

1 Delivery OK

1 convex OK

1 concave OK

1 Straight OK

1 mini pans OK

1 Boot end 8 3.2 1.4 OK

2 Chain bin 5 1.5 1.8 8

Approximate values Would need to have special bins made up, and then would need to look at handling options with longer lower bins, what machines do we have to this with. Maybe a low loader flat top Further Revew required

30

Page 31: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Analysis Cont

Roof

supports 77 Run of Face 7.1 1.7 1.8 30

Won't fit down current drift, over weight and too high Will need a low loader flat top, and do something with the weight issue Canopy must come off

special Low loader required

10 Gate end 7.5 1.75 1.8 31

Won't fit down current drift, over weight and too high Will need a low loader flat top, and do something with the weight issue Canopy must come off

special Low loader required

2 Transition shields 7.9 1.7 1.8 31.5

Won't fit down current drift, over weight and too high Will need a low loader flat top, and do something with the weight issue Canopy must come off

special Low loader required

Electrics 1 Tx 10 3.55 2.2 45 Won't fit down current drift

Must be stripped, transported and assembled again underground, special

low loader required

1 Pump DCB 4.5 1.1 1.35 5.5 Ok

1 Face DCB 9.1 1.25 1 9.5 Ok

1 CME 2.5 1 1.3 5 Ok

1 AFC motor Ok

Pumps 2 Pump module 4.5 1.31 1.4 5.2 Ok

2 Tank Module 4.5 1.31 1.4 8 Ok

1 Dump valve pod 2.5 1.31 1.4 3 OK

31

Page 32: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Analysis Cont

Shearer 1 Main body 8.5 1.8 1.4 36 Too heavy to go down current drift

Component Weights and sizes have been calculated will require stripping

2 Ranging arm 3.1 1.7 0.9 10.5 OK Requires Jig

2 Drum 2 2 0.9 4 OK

Mono rail 10 mono rail pump pods 2.3 1.8 0.8 To Big Reengineered

10 Hose cassette 17.4 2.9 2 6.5 tare

Won't fit down current drift Two cassettes in line to accommodate the length of hose required Reengineered

32

Page 33: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

33

Roof supports

● The roof supports were manufactured with the intent to install

underground as a fully assembled tested and fit for purpose plant.

● Engineering review identified

– Roof support collapsed 1850mm – Canopy removed 1750mm

– Frames required to ensure the canopy can be transported

underground

– Risk Analysis and Safe Work Procedures developed

– Low Loaders engineered and manufactured for the Base

– Underground crane purchased and installed

Page 34: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Nice New Roof supports

34

Page 35: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

What we have to do to them

35

Page 36: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Trials strips completed and SWP developed

36

Page 37: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Procedure in fast forward

37

Page 38: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Procedure in fast forward

38

Page 39: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Procedure in fast forward

39

Position canopy on

frame

Page 40: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Procedure in fast forward

40

Base ready for

transport to site.

Page 41: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Canopy frame design and manufacture

● Transport frame design Considerations

– Remain lower than drift access portal

– Must be able to be transported by the underground battery

hauler and be positioned over the body of the machine.

● Final Design

– 2 Piece design

– Winder frame – carries all components and is lower than

1.45m

– Battery hauler transport plate, locating lugs and securing

points for the winder frame – bottom of the canopy must be

higher than 1.6m.

– Must be able to handle the braking force in event of winder

emergency stop.

41

Page 42: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Final Canopy frame

42

Page 43: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Canopy Frame includes the side shield

43

Page 44: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Roof support Base Transport

● Conceptual design and functional requirement agreed

upon at site

● Engaged Reliance Hexham to complete final engineering

and detailed design of the low loader skip

● Restrictions

– Maximum radius of rail

– Off camber sequential changes in rail height and angle

– Drift has to locations where it flattens and then rolls over causing

clearance issues to the bogie floor and roof support to roof

– Weight – drift Max 22t

44

Page 45: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

45

Page 46: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Manufacture

46

Page 47: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Hosing and Cylinders

47

Page 48: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Skip trial

48

Page 49: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Test silhouette of roof support

49

Page 50: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

tight

Page 51: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Tight

Page 52: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Tight

Page 53: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Touching but will only scar one shield

Page 54: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

First trial

Skip first trial on site was empty – we did not get past the

first turn on surface - Derail

– Jack hammer concrete

54

Page 55: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Second Trial

● Skip second trial – derail

– Increase articulation of bogies

55

Page 56: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Success Third Trial – Pit Bottom reached Empty

56

Page 57: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

First Trial entering drift loaded

Page 58: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Shield at lowest travelling height

Page 59: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Shield arrives pit bottom – Relief

Page 60: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

60

Page 61: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Underground Crane workshop

● To enable the roof supports to be reassembled

underground an underground crane workshop was built

with a 25tonne crane concrete flooring.

● Process

– Excavate crane workshop to 8m high and support

– Secondary support installed

– Installation of crane frame no ground mounted pedestals

– Concreted floor level

– Wall Cranes installed to assist in the handling of the 160kg pins

– Ventilatation fans installed to allow for welding and other site

works.

61

Page 62: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Underground Crane workshop

62

Page 63: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

UG Workshop construction by mine

Page 64: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Assembly of Roof support

● Once the roof supports are underground they are moved

into the underground crane workshop and reassembled

following detailed Safe Work Procedures

● Disassembly = 4.5 hours, position canopy and secure on

frame.

● Assembly = 2 roof supports on day shift, 1 on afternoon

shift and setting up another 2 supports ready for day

work.

64

Page 65: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

AFC and BSL

● The AFC and BSL was identified as requiring

modification post mandatory drawing signing, luckily

prior to manufacture identified changes

– Ramp pans separated from bed plate

– TG sliding module and drive module bed frame split.

– Crusher requires rotor and base plate to be split and transported

seperately

– MG Drive base split into 2

– Ramp pan split

– Boot end will stripped into 4 discreet components

65

Page 66: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

AFC Transport Sizes

Page 67: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

AFC Transport Sizes

Page 68: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Crusher Transport Sizes

Page 69: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Boot End Transport Sizes

Page 70: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Transformer

● Ampcontrol 4.5mva transformer will be required to be

fully stripped

– Remove low and high tension end enclosures

– Remove transformer tank

– Remove tracks

● The transformer tank will be transported on a specifically

manufactured low loader.

70

Page 71: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Transformer dimensions

71

Page 72: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Monorail

– Concertina sections delivered straight to site in discreet

components and assembled underground

– The transportation sleds were designed to transport the trolleys,

drives and sleds underground.

– Suitable 160m heading identified and monorail hung for the

assembly of the monorail underground.

72

Page 73: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Monorail sled base

73

Page 74: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Drive Transport Sled

74

Page 75: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

75

Page 76: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

Shearer

● Shearer chassis weighs 31.1tonnes without Ranging

arms (to be transported separately)

● Remove

– Down Drives – 4.3 t

– Sloughing Plate – 1.5 t

– Ranging arm cylinders - 1.6 t

– Faceside beams and skid shoe – 0.5 t

● Shearer will then be approximately 23 t, we will then

continue to strip until the machine weighs in at 22t.

76

Page 77: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

“A carelessly planned project takes three times longer to complete than

expected; a carefully planned project takes only twice as long

77

When presented with a challenge look

at it as an opportunity to change others

attitudes and expectations.

Thankyou for your valuable time!

Questions??

Page 78: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

78

Page 79: Martin Kime, Metropolitan Mine - Peabody Energy - CASE STUDY – Metropolitan Replacement long Wall - Innovations and Transportation

www.PeabodyEnergy.com