21

L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

  • Upload
    -

  • View
    2.228

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

beter vision for better living

Citation preview

Page 1: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008
Page 2: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

Keratometry: Main Points so Far• Keratometry uses the anterior cornea as a mirror

• Distant object: h rAC

• Keratometer Equation:

• Virtual corneal image (h) inaccessible, small and

unstable (eye movements), so:– Use objective lens to focus reflected rays as a real image

– magnify the real image with an eyepiece lens (~ 5 mag)

– split the real image inside the keratometer into two using a half-field prism; adjust prism to “double” images

h

hbrAC

2

Page 3: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

OBJECTIVE

h

½ hC

MIRE

F

CORNEA

½ h

h

< h

PRISM (P)IMAGE PLANE

P

Fig 13.17, Page 13.18

Moving prism toward image plane decreases image displacement (x)

Previously doubled images are no longer doubled (now overlap)

What new corneal radius would this prism position “suit”?

What happens if we move the prism?

x

Page 4: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

Q1: Based on the previous figure, how could the keratometer prism be used to yield a measure of anterior cornea radius?

for s

horter c

orneal radii,.

..

for s

horter c

orneal radii,.

..

It co

uld provid

e a qualita...

33% 33%33%

1. for shorter corneal radii, the prism would be moved LEFT to double the images

2. for shorter corneal radii, the prism would be moved RIGHT to double the images

3. It could provide a qualitative comparison only between corneas based on separation or overlap of the images

Page 5: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

Fig 13.22, Page 13.27

ILLUMINATED MIRE

HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL PRISMS

EYEPIECEOBSERVER

GRATICULE PLANE

APERTURE PLATE

CORNEAL MIRE

IMAGEPH

PV

OBJECTIVE LENS

Schematic View of the B & L Optical System

Two prisms means two deviated images

OBJ

Page 6: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

Topcon Keratometer

What the Clinician Sees

V 90 / H 180

Page 7: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

h'90

Corneal vertex

B & L: Oriented to Measure r90 and r180

h'180

Question: If most corneas are aspheric, what is one drawback with a keratometer?

Answer: only measuring radius at one location (annulus) on cornea; and it is NOT central radius

OBJ

Page 8: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

h'60

Corneal vertex

B & L: Oriented to Measure r60 and r150

h'150

60

150 30

90

180 (0)

15

45

75105120

135

165

180

Page 9: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

Q2: What does this appearance indicate?

Spheric

al corn

eal surfa

ce

Irregular A

stigm

atism

Obliq

ue Astigm

atism

With

-the-R

ule Astigm

atism

Against-

the-Rule Astig...

20% 20% 20%20%20%

1. Spherical corneal surface

2. Irregular Astigmatism

3. Oblique Astigmatism

4. With-the-Rule Astigmatism

5. Against-the-Rule Astigmatism

Page 10: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

h'90

Corneal vertex

B & L: Oriented to Measure r90 and r180

h'180

Question: What does the above appearance indicate?

Answer: anterior corneal astigmatism. What type?

Against-the-rule

OBJ

Page 11: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

Estimation of Total Corneal Power Most keratometers read out both anterior radius and total corneal power. How is this possible?

It is not!

Keratometer gives only anterior corneal radius - it cannot measure posterior radius total corneal power reading is an estimate

Estimate usually reasonable because the anterior cornea carries so much of the total corneal power (big n)

Page 13.23

OBJ

Page 12: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

To see how we could estimate total corneal power from Keratometry (anterior radius alone) modify the Exact Eye to simulate what the keratometer is measuring

Basis of Corneal Power Estimate

Effectively creating a new schematic eye with an anterior cornea only that gives the same total corneal power as the Exact Eye

Page 13: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

Basis of Corneal Power Estimate - Exact Eye

r1 = +7.7 mm

naqueous

1.336

ncornea

1.376

nair

1.000

r2 = +6.8 mmFe (cornea) +43.05 D

F1 = +48.83 D

F2 = 5.88 D

Page 13.23

Page 14: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

Basis of Corneal Power Estimate - Modified Exact Eye

r1 = +7.7 mm

naqueous

1.336nair

1.000ncornea

1.376

r2 = +6.8 mmFe (cornea) +43.05 D

F1 = +48.83 D

F2 = 5.88 D

Based on Keratometry want anterior surface only

Page 15: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

Basis of Corneal Power Estimate - Modified Exact Eye

r1 = +7.7 mm

naqueous

1.336nair

1.000

r2 = +6.8 mmFe (cornea) +43.05 D

F1 = +48.83 D

F2 = 5.88 D

Based on Keratometry want anterior surface only

Page 16: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

Basis of Corneal Power Estimate - Modified Exact Eye

r1 = +7.7 mm

naqueous

1.336nair

1.000

Keep true anterior corneal radius - this is what keratometry measures

Want single surface cornea to give same

+43.05 D as the Exact Eye cornea

1r

nnFcornea

Only option is to change naqueous

Using n = 1.3315, the +7.7 mm Exact Eye

anterior corneal radius yields correct total

corneal power +43.05 D

Why is new n < 1.336?

Page 17: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

Estimation of Total Corneal Power Calibration Refractive Index = 1.3315 works for real corneas if:

anterior : posterior corneal radii are in the same proportion as the SEEE cornea (7.7/6.8)

central thickness of the cornea is 0.5 mm

Usually a good estimate, but keratometer cannot verify either of these properties

Page 13.24

Page 18: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

Calibration Refractive Indices - Real Keratometers

Zeiss, Rodenstock 1.332

B & L, Haag-Streit (Javal-Schiötz) 1.3375

American Optical 1.336

B&L and AO index based on corneal back vertex power estimate (using posterior cornea as reference plane)

Page 19: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

Calibration Refractive Index - B & L Keratometer Different keratometer calibration refractive indices will give different total power estimates

Contact lens practice corneal power estimate used to estimate total corneal astigmatism.

Astigmatism rarely exceeds 10% of total corneal power(~ +43 D) 0.78 D discrepancy in total power estimate translates to 0.078 D discrepancy in corneal astigmatism

Intraocular implant design: formula uses total corneal power estimate from keratometry directly with 1.3375, the SEEE cornea’s in situ power is 0.78 D higher

OBJ

Page 13.24-25

Page 20: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

Intraocular Implant Design

Relies heavily on axial length and keratometer readings:

KLAP 9.05.2

IOL power for

emmetropia

Constant based on IOL type

Axial length in mm

Average total corneal power based

on keratometry

OBJ: when applying formula, the basis (ncal) of the K value must be consistent

with the ‘A’ value (design constant)

Page 21: L15 chapter 13 keratometry and keratoscopy 2 2007 2008

Corneal Power Estimate - Routine Applications Estimating total corneal astigmatism.

Estimating total ocular astigmatism: intraocular astigmatism averages 0.5 D atr for most patients with moderate to high astigmatism, corneal astigmatism is a good predictor of total ocular astigmatism

Problem with estimates of total ocular astigmatism keratometry will not identify exceptions to the trend

Page 13.25