10
V5: Coordination and Change Project Framing institutions and policies as processes JeanPhilippe Venot, IWMI CPWF Volta Science Week Ouagadougou 35 July 2012

Framing institutions and policies as processes

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

CPWF Volta Science Workshop: Coordination and Learning from Adaptive Management and Change

Citation preview

Page 1: Framing institutions and policies as processes

V5: Coordination and Change Project

Framing institutions and policies as processes

Jean‐Philippe Venot, IWMI

CPWF Volta Science WeekOuagadougou3‐5 July 2012

Page 2: Framing institutions and policies as processes

Objective and Approach

The focus is on HOW and WHY research and policies are framed rather than on WHAT they entail

3 main research questions:• Why do particular policy and intervention models related to 

agricultural water management emerge, persist and change?

• Whose knowledge is included in the policy process and how? 

• What are the politics of research and policy making in the agricultural water management sector in the Volta Basin?

Is CPWF doing something different and how?

Page 3: Framing institutions and policies as processes

Defining “boundaries”

Actors’ network

Roles/responsibilities

Characterize relationships

Ideology and Discourse

Diagnosis Characterization Analysis

Legitimacy/accountability

National priorities/strategies

Actor’s identification

Explicit Worldviews

Different steps

Research Trajectory

Page 4: Framing institutions and policies as processes

Where are we: topic of study

• SWC (V2)• Small reservoirs (V3)• IWRM (V4)

Defining “boundaries”

Diagnosis

Page 5: Framing institutions and policies as processes

Where are we: Discourses

Ideology and Discourse

Demography High population growthHigh poverty rate, especially in rural areasGrowing demand for food

Climate/Water Rainfall unreliability + extreme events (droughts/floods)Available but little developed water resources

Agricultural system Importance and low productivity of rainfed agricultural  systemsVulnerability to limited water stressLow yield and technical potential for improvement

Environment Soil erosion and degradation/low soil fertilityResilience and adaptation

Socio‐economic context Economic importance of agricultural sectorSecuring land tenureEfficiency

Little change since the 1970sCPWF appropriate the same

Defining “boundaries”

Diagnosis Discourses are important because they contribute to establishing what is ‘true’ and what ‘should’ happen.

Page 6: Framing institutions and policies as processes

Where are we: priorities/strategies

Ideology and Discourse

Defining “boundaries”

Diagnosis

National priorities/strategies

• Infrastructure investment in drinking water and sanitation• Productive agricultural investments

• “Growth pole” (i.e. Bagre in Burkina Faso)• Large public irrigation systems• Modernization/export‐crops (pineapple, cocoa, etc.)

• Inter‐sectoral linkages in Burkina Faso (with the PNSR)

Early wins/best bets versus diffuse results 

• Small scale agricultural water management• BF: On the public agenda but ‘constraints’ on individuals• GH: Not really on the agenda but less constraint on the individuals

Page 7: Framing institutions and policies as processes

Roles/responsibilities

Characterization

Actor’s identification

Different steps: IWRM Actors (BF)

Administration

Regional representative

‘District’ representative

BURKINA FASO

‘Users’ representative

Civil society

Traditional authorities

Research and education• What roles for these actors in SWC/Small reservoirs?• Which other actors in SWC/Small reservoirs?

Consultative roleCentral role of the DGRE infacilitating the group 

National

River b

asin

CLE

Planning roleCentral role of the NT infacilitating the group 

Not active

Page 8: Framing institutions and policies as processes

Roles/responsibilities

Characterization

Actor’s identification

Different steps: IWRM Actors (GH)

Administration

Regional representative

‘District’ representative

GHANA

‘Users’ representative

Civil society

Traditional authorities

Research and education

National

River b

asin Planning role

Central role of the basin officer

Planning roleCentral role of administrationAbsence of MoFA

• What roles for these actors in SWC/Small reservoirs?• Which other actors in SWC/Small reservoirs?

Woman representative

Page 9: Framing institutions and policies as processes

Roles/responsibilities

Characterization

Actor’s identification

Different steps: IWRM Actors (BF)

Legitimacy/accountability

• In Burkina Faso, strong involvement of private consultants (former civil servants) in policy framing (consultance)

• Multi‐level interactions follow sectoral hierarchical lines

• Lack of linkage between ‘water‐institutions’ and agricultural socio‐professional groups

• Challenges faced in terms of participation and representativity of users

How do people come into assuming responsabilities?

Page 10: Framing institutions and policies as processes

Why small reservoirs continue to exist

Discourse coalitionInterpretative community