Upload
finpro
View
172
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Objectives of the Landscape analysis
• Mapping of the situation of the Finnish ITS/MaaS sector– Players, structure and segments
– Business potential
• Finnish offering and competitiveness– Key areas of the Finnish offering
Desk study
Interviews
Value netdescription Conclusion and
Recommendations
Begin
nin
go
f Ap
ril20
16
End
of Ju
ne
20
16
The Understanding
ITS
• Intelligent mobility, upper layer
• Technology utilized in transportation
• Telematics, robotisation, informationsolutions, traffic status, transportationsafety, intelligent control, ease of use, payment systems,, efficiency, environmental aspects, vehicleproperties
• Enabler of MaaS
MaaS
• A novel service layer for end user
• All transportation produced with shared resources
• Fixed price for all mobility
• Market based, user centric, resource wisdom, alternative to private car, mobility design and planning, door-to-door, taxi, ride sharing, publictransport, event tickets
• The whole transportation market or only operation of the services?
• No need for accurate definition (!)
The Need
• Ease, cost and/or security
• Everyone a potential customer, but not necessarily of all services
• Savings in transportation investments for private and public parties
• Less congestion, less pollutants
• Personal attitudes have biggest impact
• No cases yet, big operators in waiting mode
• Need for passenger cars may growwith MaaS
• Need for sticks and carrots bypublic authoritites
The Potential
• A lot is needed to enable MaaS
• Slow penetration, incremental development
• Until 2020 moderate growth to be expected,
• Currently public transportation vs. owning a car
• Hype and trend work for MaaS
• New service segments into the game, newactors will take theirshare
• Investments efficientlyused
• All kinds of movements towards MaaS, a lot of steps in the way
• Billions in five/ten years, 10 fold to telecom
• “15 %” of the transport-ation market passenger transportation, 20 % of that target for MaaS
The Network
• Transportation operators: public, taxis, rental, car sharing, rental bikes,
• Telecom, IT platform providers, positioning services, OEMs
• “My data” operators
• MaaS operators
• Payment service providers
• Public private to work together more, common cause to be found
• Local partners are needed for scale up internationally
• Probability for a Finnish case small
• Service providers have to be bound to the network
*The company logos mentioned are only for descriptive purposeSource: Frost & Sullivan / Tekes
The Benchmarks
• Finnish competence is good, limited knowledge about the situation elsewhere a risk, though
• E.g. in Shanghai single card works in buses, trains and taxis
• A few shining stars, OEMs, digital service companies (Apple, Google etc.)
• US near to commercialization, a lot of startups
• Swedes to be followed, often more agile than Finns
• Finland to learn supporting of own industry from other countries
The Tasks
Enterprises Public authoritities Research
• Market will take care of matter
• If incentives are in order, enterprises will take advantage of them
• MaaS Alliance a possibility
• Purchasing of knowledge, participating in the movement
• Internationalization a must
• Legislation basically ok
• Deregulation
• Public purchasing in key role
• Money to follow users in public services
• Incentives have to be good
• Liikennekaari
• Support for investments, R&D and communication
• Observing of the changes;
• First of a kind solutionsare a challenge for academia
• Also the required scientific competence has to be brought to Finland
SMART TRAFFIC – ICT IN INTELLIGENT TRAFFIC SYSTEMS
Key technical competences• Wireless communications and communication networks
• System design and system architectures of large information systems
• System integration of large information systems
• Sensor systems (including imaging, radar etc.)
• Big data, machine learning , data analytics
• Data visualization
• Cloud computing
• Application development (e.g. traffic light priorities, adaptive traffic signs)
• Location information, maps, traffic information, weather information
• Dependable systems
• Security
SERVICES: traffic control, intelligent
transportation etc.
MOBILITY ICT INFRASTRUCTURE
INTELLIGENT
VEHICLESCONSUMER
DEVICES
TRAFFIC INFRA-STRUCTURE:• Sensor systems• Info displays• Traffic lights• Other control
mechanisms
MOBILITY AS A SERVICE – POWERED BY ICT
Key competences• Service business concept development
and deployment
• Business model development
• Service platforms and Web backend
• Mobile applications, Web applications
• System integration of large information systems
• Big data, machine learning, analytics
• Data visualization
• Location information and maps
• Payments
• Security
SCHEDULED TRAFFIC
DEMAND-BASED TRAFFIC
PRIVATE & SHARED TRAFFIC
The SWOT
Plus
• Mutual will, technology
• Pragmatic approach in data security
• Innovativeness, technology, telecommunication
• Nordic service design
• Utilization of Nordic dimension in communication
• Reputation in game industry
• Distributed system
• Everyone knows each other
• Contacts with public authorities easy
Minus
• Understanding of own position
• Knowledge of happenings elsewhere
• Courage to contact international projects
• Marketing
• Money
• Modest patterns of thinking
• Not densely enough populated
• Lack of major enterprises