Upload
patrick-collings
View
2.647
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This is one of two presentations I gave at the branded entertainment conference in Johannesburg on 24 March 2010. This particular presentation focuses on structuring branded entertainment deals, primarily the insertion of brands into film or television scripts. Many of the points are applicable to other forms of branded entertainment and branded content. I have gone with more text in this presentation than I normally do so it should be fairly easy to follow. A good deal of the content within the presentation is taken from Jean-Marc Lehu’s book Branded Entertainment which I believe is the best book on branded entertainment to date.
Citation preview
doing the dealpatrick collingssagacite
branded entertainment conferencejohannesburgmarch 2010
the right content
the right association
the right price
the right deal
much of upcoming focus on insertion of brands into entertainment projects
taken from the view of the brand, but applicable to many aspects of branded
entertainment and content
the right content
image by stephen poff
As3
appropriate
authentic
alignment
image by stephen poff
the right association
the objective of branded entertainment or branded content is to associate a brand with an entity or a situation thereby creating favourable
brand awareness and understanding
that association can be through a logo, mention of brand name, the product or
its packaging or a combination
association can be achieved with four traditional types of brand placement
classic placementthe product appears in the camera’s view during filming. relatively easy and cheap to execute but may go unnoticed or be easily discarded.
brand placementbrand over the product may result in better longevity, easier insertion and benefits brand portfolio. however, requires viewer awareness of brand.
evocative placementnot for all. product must be original and design distinctive enough to be instantly recognizable. benefits from careful integration into script.
stealth placementhighly discreet, almost undetectable and mostly well integrated into a scene given it a powerful impact when identified. nod to those in the know but easiest to be missed.
“Abnormal returns associated with product placement in successful films are enhanced by
tie-in advertising campaigns and when the placement is for a high equity brand. Product
placement worth is also enhanced by the film’s audience size and when the product receives (a visual and audio) placement.”
Michael A Wiles & Anna Danielova
however, value of placement is reduced when
audiences are absorbed in the film
when the film is critically acclaimed
when there is extremely violent content
the more other brand placements are included
3 other types of placements
virtual placement
reverse placement
product displacementproduct displacement
image by stephen poff
the right price
the anxiety question
image by luna di rimmel
1975 1985 1992 2002
Clairol pats $10,000 to have products appear in Smile
California Raisin Board pay $25,000 to appear in
Back to the Future
France Télécom pay $610,000 for telephone call
in La Bella Historie
Ford pay between $30m and $40m to place Aston Martin
in Die Another Day
Cost of Product Placement
$0well close to that
R40,000 to be exclusive wine in one of 13 episodes of cooking show that will be
aired on BBC Lifestyle
distortion
factors that can influence the cost of a placement
Brand’s fame
The more famous the brand, the more likely the recognition and derived benefit and therefore a higher placement fee than a relatively unknown brand
Identification of brand
The more the brand is identified the higher the placement cost
The film’s budget
The bigger the budget the more expensive the placement is likely to be to mitigate risk of the project. Often emphasis on promotional spend
Type and genre of the
film
Small, independent and “arty” productions can not expect to charge the same fee as international, mainstream production
Those involved in the
project
The more famous the actors, director and producer and the better their individual and collective track record, the more a brand can expect to pay
The barter deal
In many cases the cost of supplying the product constitutes the cost of the placement, but not as cheap as one may think
Seeing the placement
The more prominent the placement in terms of screen space and time, the more the brand is going to pay
Integration into the story
Integration beats appearance, therefore integration carries a premium over appearance
It gets used by those that
matter
If a brand gets used or mentioned by a principal actor then expect to pay for that. And you may have to pay the actor as well, especially if that association is used in additional marketing material
Exclusivity for the brand
Too many brands dissipate the viewer’s attention, but exclusivity costs and your competitors want it just as badly
Recurring placements
Placement in scenes that are shown in addition to the entertainment piece, such as trailers or websites, can expect to pay more
How widely distributed
The more people that potentially can see the film or show, the more the brand will pay to be inside the film or show. Also consider secondary distribution.
Accompanying communication
Placement cost goes down if promotional cost goes up, but in the end the costs must be tallied. Also need to consider who is benefiting more.
Don’t forget the tie-ins
The ability to merchandize the involvement or even implement reverse placement
The cost of getting the deal
Need to factor in additional fees such as legal and agent’s commission
lot of common sense,but no single formula
the right deal
things to remember for those boardroom negotiations
image by nur hussein
Subject and story line
Is the subject and story line compatiable with the brand’s past, present and future? Is it in line with the brand’s values? Context is important. Remember to state that script change can nullify the agreement
Is it authenticSimilar to the previous point, but deserves own emphasis: is the brand’s inclusion authentic? Tramps don’t normally wear Cartier watches
What has gone before
Take into the consideration the studio’s previous handling of product placement. Is your brand getting a worse, similar or better deal to what has gone before?
Know the director
What is their attitude towards brand placement. Are they willing participants or are they being forced to incorporate your brand.
Who has the final say
Is it the producer or the director? What is the brand’s ability to influence or demand compliance.
Actors associated
with the brand
Which actors will be associated with the brand and in what context. Remember that actors have their own brand equity beyond the success or failure of the project
Contractual compatibility
Is the brand placement compatiable with the actor’s contractual obligations away from the film. Authenticity suffers when the brand fails to go home with the actor.
Where possible, write
it in
Try and secure as much as possible in the contract. Difficult for placement of product but relevant extract from script can be written into contract
Try stay involved
Don’t lose control of the brand just because it is on a film set. If possible make sure there is someone to advise on the placement
Get yourself in the credits
Being thanked in the credits makes the brand association look less like brand marketing
Try leave payment until
the end
Expect to pay something upfront, but it is preferable for the balance of payment to coincide with the end of shooting or, better still, the release date
Protect the brand
Clearly state that the rights attached to the brand in question remain the property of the brand. Restrict usage to terms of the contract
Look ahead & anticipate
Consider all tie-ins, public relations, supporting advertising campaigns before you draft and sign the contract.
Know when things will
happen
Understand when the film will be released and that products placed are still valid. Is the brand protected by delays?
Don’t tell anyone
Precise conditions of a placement deal are rarely disclosed because nothing undermines authenticity as much as an accompanying price tag
that’s a wrap
patrick collingssagacite
e: [email protected]: +27 (0)83 616 0967w: www.sagacite.co.zab: www.collings.co.zat: pjcollings (follow me on twitter)