27
Presented By: Alnaseer Karim Husnain Shirazi Hassan Raza Asim Saleem Waqas Sultan Faizan Anwer

Dawlance

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Case Study Dawlance

Citation preview

  • 1. Presented By: Alnaseer Karim Husnain Shirazi Hassan Raza Asim Saleem Waqas Sultan Faizan Anwer

2. Presentation Flow:1.Introduction I.Case Brief II. Company Overview III.Dawlance Positioning2.The Television Market I.Evolution of Televisions II. Local & International TV Market III.TVCsA.SamsungB.LGC.SonyD.NobelE.Dawlance IV. Dawlance TV Range V.Dawlance Vs Competitors VI. Brand Positioning3.Dawlance I.Dawlance Strategy II. Reasons for Dawlance TV failure4.Conclusion I.Branded House Vs House of Brands II. Our Recommendation 3. Case Brief Dawlance is the market leader in HomeAppliances with revenue of PKR 48b in2011 Dawlance enjoys market leadership in therefrigerator segment (65%) Market reception for Dawlance TVs hasbeen extremely lukewarm and the projecthas thus been abandoned Sony, Philips, LG, Samsung and Nobelhave strong presence in the TV segmentCase Question:Which brand extension policy to choose for Dawlance TV, Branded house or House ofBrand? 4 4. Company Overview Start of operations: 1980 Current Product Range: Refrigerators, Washing Machines, Chest Freezers, Vertical Freezers, Split AC, Televisions & Microwave Ovens5 5. Company Overview Values: Reliability Teamwork Communication Transparency Respect Openness & Candor Creativity Vision: Make Dawlance A Global Brand By Practicing Reliability: Make Pakistan Proud Of Us Mission: Promote Reliability In Everything We Do In The Field Of Household Appliances 6 6. Company Overview Fact Sheet: Dawlance is the 7th most Favorite brand in Pakistan out of 3500 brands Highest market share in 3 out of 5 categories Among Top 2 Top of mind (TOM) Brands in all product categories Research revealed that Dawlance is in Every 2nd house hold in Pakistan (out of those house holds which have appliances) Dawlance is considered to be the most Reliable & Innovative brand among all home appliance brands in Pakistan7 7. Company Overview 8 8. Dawlance Positioning Is this the right positioning for the TV segment? 9 9. Evolution of TV11 10. Local & International TV Market Local Players: LG Nobel Sony Samsung Philips International Players: Samsung LG Sony Panasonic Sharp Others12 11. TVC: Samsung 13 12. TVC: LG14 13. TVC: Sony15 14. TVC: Nobel 16 15. TVC: Dawlance17 16. Dawlance TV Range18 17. Dawlance Vs Competitors VS19 18. Brand PositioningSmart TVReal Cinema 3D ExperienceColor Like No OtherReal Value for MoneyReliable20 19. Dawlance Strategy Product Strategy: Products, which are as per international standards and carry all the basic features. The most important factors are durability, reliability and good after sales services. Pricing Strategy: Primary focus is to cater to the middle and upper middle class, however there is a selected range of products which cater to the upper class as well. Uniform pricing throughout Pakistan Promotion Strategy: Promotion budget is around 1.75% of turnover. 40% of which goes towards Print Media, 20% on TV, 20% on Out door and 20% on Sales Promotions. Placement Strategy: More than 800 dealers spread across the country. 16 Retail Outlets 22 20. Reasons for Dawlance TV failure Product Shortcomings: The product was not high-end, i.e. it lacked features and form factors which were establishedindustry standards. The product was a vanilla product and lacked variants. Target Market Problem: The offering was only targeted towards the lower and lower middle class. Promotional Shortcomings: The product was not promoted well enough, especially considering that Dawlance was entering intoa new segment. Positioning Problem: The product was not positioned in line with the demands of the market. Dawlances Positioning whilemore suitable for its other products, was not exactly the right one for the TV segment.23 21. Branded House Vs House of Brands:Branded HouseHouse of BrandsPros:Pros: More Efficient to manage Individual Brand Independence Cost Effective Shield the corporate name in the event Streamlined Decision makingof problems New additions can leverage parentbrand equity Simplified messaging to stakeholders Closer organization alignmentCons:Cons: Ambiguity Issues Costly Closer organization alignment Complicated to manage Bad performance of one Brand effects Difficult to manage corporate imageparent brand No existing parent brand equity to leverage 25 22. Branded House Vs House of Brands:Our Recommendation: House of Brands26