54
Regulatory Overview

CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

Regulatory Overview

Page 2: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

2

REGULATOR ACTIVITY - WOM & SOCIAL

• FTC Testimonial and Endorsement Guidelines (2009)

• FTC .Com Disclosure Update (March 2013)

• FINRA Regulatory Notice 10-06 (Jan 2010)

• FINRA Regulatory Notice 11-39 (Aug 2011)

• FFIEC Final Guidance (Dec 2013)

• SEC Guidance Update (March 2013)

• SEC Netflix Report (April 2013)

• SEC JOBS Act related updates (Summer 2013)

• SEC CDI – Hyperlinked disclosure (April 2014)

• FDA draft SM guidance (June 2014)

• NLRB (ongoing)

Page 3: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

3

COMMON REGULATOR THEMES

• Social media is subject to the same rules that apply to traditional media

• Establish documented policies and procedures

• Train representatives and agencies - aware of responsibilities

• Disclose/disclaim to avoid entanglement & adoption

Page 4: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

4

FTC: Testimonials & Endorsements

• All material connections must be disclosed with documented process

• Inform & Disclose

• Disclosures must be clear & conspicuous

• Advertisers and agencies are liable

• Ensure policies are clearly communicated to agencies and influencers

• Create a process that ensures a culture of compliance

• Document & Monitor

• Must be aware of what your influencers are saying

• Process & procedures must be documented

• Follow Up & Takedown

• 100% coverage not expected; proactivity and responsiveness is

Page 5: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

5

FTC: .Com Disclosures

• Disclosure methods must be appropriate for all viewing environments

• Be wary of technical limitations

• When practical, incorporate disclosures in claim itself

• If linking to separate disclosure, link must be clear & conspicuous

• If platform limitations prevent effective disclosure, don’t use that platform

• Consider the “net impression” to the consumer

• Understandable to the intended audience?

• Prominent? (Consider proximity, appearance and context)

• Unavoidable to consumers?

• Repeated in order to ensure that it is effectively communicated?

• Free from distracting elements?

• Proper volume, style and duration to ensure comprehension? (Audio & video)

• Many current ad-hoc disclosure methods are not acceptable

• #Spon, generic link shorteners and obfuscated links all called out as insufficient

Page 6: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

6

FTC: Native Advertising Workshop

Workshop Takeaways

• No agreed definition of native advertising

• Publishers are embracing a new method of connecting with audiences

• No best practices for disclosure or delineation of editorial vs. advertorial

• FTC held a workshop in December 2013 and will be a focus of 2014

Areas of Concern

• Disclosure

• Promotion and syndication

• Editorial controls and advertiser influence

• Blurred lines raise concerns of regulators

Page 7: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

7

FINRA: Notice 10-06

• Keep records of all communications

• Suitability rules apply

• Establish policies and procedures regarding specific recommendations

• Consider prohibiting recommendations or using pre-approved templates only

• Static content requires pre-approval; interactive content does not

• Static = advertisement (examples: profile, background, wall information, blogs)

• Interactive = public appearance (examples: Facebook status updates and tweets)

• Adopt policies and procedures

• Ensure proper supervision, training and background for representatives

• Employ risk-based principles to review

• Intermittent pre-approval or post-review (e.g. sampling or lexicon-based search)

• 3rd party posts are exempt – unless there is entanglement/adoption

Page 8: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

8

FINRA: Notice 11-39

• Use of personal accounts/devices or autobiographical nature of message

does not create an exemption

• Content is the determining factor

• Firms should have the ability to retain, retrieve and supervise regardless of source

• Recordkeeping rules apply to both interactive and static posts

• Difference in supervision requirements only

• Automatic deletion does not create an exemption (and is therefore not usable)

• 3rd party posts should be archived if they relate to the business

• Representative “red flags” must be investigated

• Representatives may answer 3rd party questions (within firm policies)

• Not responsible for 3rd party content if no entanglement/adoption

• Co-branding creates adoption

Page 9: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

9

FFIEC: Final Guidance Released

• All current laws apply – there are no exceptions for social media

• Truth in savings act, fair lending laws, truth in lending act, fair debt collection practices

act, Section 5 of the FTC Act (deceptive practices), FDIC/NCUA requirements, CAN

SPAM and more

• Have a risk management program

• Identify, measure, monitor and control risks in social media

• Governance structure that culminates with the board or senior management

• Should include official policies and procedures, diligence over 3rd party service

providers, employee training, channel monitoring, audit and reporting processes

• Be prepared to address social issues regardless of participation

• Inbound negative comments and complaints from customers

• Employees may put an institution at risk

• FFIEC will encourage adoption by state regulators

Page 10: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

10

SEC: Guidance & Netflix Report

• Guidance explained which social messages need to be filed in advance

• Marketing messages, discussion of fund performance should be filed

• Incidental mentions, introductory statements referring to linked data and factual

statements that don’t discuss performance investment merits should not

• Netflix report sets the rules for use of social media as official channels

• Provide public with advance notice through existing channels

• Use channels investing public can freely access

• Apply the same level of scrutiny as in other channels

• Establish controls and procedures to monitor communications

• Inform representatives of their responsibilities in social media (and that they cannot be

avoided by purporting to speak in their “individual” capacities)

• Make certain to follow the guidelines laid out in 2008 for dissemination of company

information in electronic channels

Page 11: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

11

SEC: 2008 Reg FD for Digital

• Keep account(s) current, active and accurate

• Provide full information in context or via link in close proximity

• Beware of entanglement and adoption

• When linking to 3rd party content, provide context or disclaim/disclose any connection

to the source

• Avoid linking to false or misleading information

• Disclaimers do not protect from fraud

• Certify that CEO and CFO are responsible for maintaining controls and

procedures and are aware of disseminated information

Page 12: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

12

SEC: JOBS Act Updates

• Prohibition against general solicitation for Reg D offerings eliminated

• Securities may be offered to non-institutional buyers

• All purchasers must be accredited investors

• Must take reasonable steps to verify status

• Nature of purchaser, amount and type of information about purchaser the issuer

collects and nature/terms of offering are all valid factors

• (Draft) Written materials must include legends and other disclosures

• Applies to both general solicitation communications and sales materials

• (Draft) General solicitation materials must be filed with SEC

• No later than date of first use

Page 13: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

13

FDA Guidance

• November 2009 – Social media guidance was promised

• Deadlines were pushed back a number of times

• Congress mandated that social media guidance be published by June 2014

• FDA has announced that they are on track to provide social media guidance

• FDA 2014 guidance agenda published

‒ Initial guidance – January 2014

‒ Additional advertising & social media guidance is on the agenda

‒ Publication dates TBD

Page 14: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

14

FDA 2014 Guidance Agenda

• Considerations for Regulatory Submissions of Promotional Labeling and Advertising

Materials including Submissions in Electronic Format (January 2014)

• Internet/Social Media Platforms with Character Space Limitations: Presenting Risk and

Benefit Information for Prescription Drugs and Medical Devices (June 2014)

• Internet/Social Media Platforms: Correcting Independent-Third Party Misinformation

About Prescription Drugs and Medical Devices (June 2014)

• Internet/Social Media Advertising and Promotional Labeling of Prescription Drugs and

MedicalDevices – Use of Links (June 2014)

• Brief Summary and Adequate Information for Use: Disclosing Risk Information in

Consumer- Directed Print Advertisements and Promotional Labeling for Prescription Drugs

(TBD – 2014)

Page 15: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

15

FDA Guidance Beginning• Considerations for Regulatory Submissions of Promotional Labeling and Advertising

Materials including Submissions in Electronic Format (Draft)

‒ Covers submission guidelines for interactive promotional material

‒ Must submit all promotional labeling and advertising at the time of initial dissemination/publication

• Two types of labeling

‒ FDA required labeling

‒ Promotional labeling

• Submit specimens upon initial dissemination (Form FDA 2253/FDA 2301)

• Responsible for product promotional communications on sites that are owned, controlled,

influenced, or operated by, or on behalf of the firm

• Under certain circumstances (any control or influence) responsible for third-party sites

‒ Employees, agents, bloggers

Page 16: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

16

FDA Guidance - What to Expect

• Brief Summary and Adequate Information for Use: Disclosing Risk Information in

Consumer- Directed Print Advertisements and Promotional Labeling for Prescription Drugs

(TBD – 2014)

‒ Updates to existing advertising requirements

• Internet/Social Media Platforms with Character Space Limitations: Presenting Risk and

Benefit Information for Prescription Drugs and Medical Devices (TBD – 2014)

‒ Addressing disclosure of risk and benefit information in Twitter, Facebook and more

‒ Links, images, videos and titles

‒ Sharing, retweeting, liking, cross-platform syndication

‒ Defining agents, representatives and managing non-restricted sites w/ active presence

‒ Restrictions of access for private Facebook pages and posts

Page 17: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

17

FDA Guidance - What to Expect

• Internet/Social Media Platforms: Correcting Independent-Third Party Misinformation

About Prescription Drugs and Medical Devices (TBD – 2014)

‒ Managing non-restricted sites and active presences across social & digital channels

‒ Sharing, retweeting, liking or commenting on misinformation

‒ Addressing agents and representatives

• Internet/Social Media Advertising and Promotional Labeling of Prescription Drugs and

MedicalDevices – Use of Links (TBD – 2014)

‒ Designing documented & unavoidable disclosure process in digital and social media channels

‒ Addressing disclosure of prescription drug information in Twitter, Facebook and more

‒ Links, images, videos and titles

‒ Sharing, retweeting, liking, cross-platform syndication

Page 18: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

Social Media Risk Considerations

Page 19: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

19

SOCIAL PROMOTIONS - Contests & Promotions

• Marketers have more responsibility & risk with increased need for structured and

auditable processes.

• FB changed their promotional guidelines providing key benefits to marketers but

increases execution risk

• Pinterest changed their promotional guidelines to restrict the use of their platform

for certain types of promotions

• Growing concerns from state AGs & class action bar

• FTC Cole Haan Pinterest indicates that contest entry can be endorsement

Page 20: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

20

BE CLEAR - Need to Present the Rules

Page 21: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

21

DISCLOSURE URLS

General

• clickhe.re

• details-he.re

• Info-he.re

• Learn-mo.re

• More-he.re

• disclaime.rs

• disclosur.es

• leg.al

Individual

• affiliate-po.st

• employee-po.st

• investor-po.st

• my-disclosur.es

• paid-po.st

• sponsored-po.st

Contests,

Promotions

Sweepstakes

• click-here-for-

rul.es

• contest-rul.es

• for-rules-click-

he.re

• full-contest-rul.es

• official-rul.es

• prize-rul.es

• prize-ter.ms

• promotional-rul.es

• rul.es

• sweeps-rul.es

• sweepstakes-

rul.es

Terms &

Conditions

• conditions-app.ly

• important-

pricing.info

• lease-offer-ter.ms

• limitations-app.ly

• offer-ter.ms

• restrictions-app.ly

• service-ter.ms

• ter.ms

• terms-app.ly

• terms-of-u.se

Warnings &

Notices

• warnin.gs

• health-warnin.gs

• legal-notic.es

• privacy-notic.es

• safety-warnin.gs

Other Languages

Available

• Dutch

• French

• German

• Italian

• Portuguese

• Spanish

Page 22: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

22

Make Rules & Terms Accessible

Page 23: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

23

Make Rules & Terms Accessible

Page 24: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

24

Facebook Timeline Promotions

• Random draw sweepstakes and

contests leverage like and comment

functionality

• Considerations

- Lack of time/date stamp for like based

entries

- Winner validation and notification

- Clear presentation of rules

- Reporting and strategic data capture

Page 25: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

25

Native Advertising / Sponsored Content

“Native advertising will be a huge and continuing theme in our work”

"There could be enforcement based on existing law and existing enforcement”

FTC Consumer Protection Bureau Director, Jessica Rich

Key Concerns:

• Transparency

• Consumer trust

• Editorial vs. Advertorial

• Standardization of terminology and best practices

• Defining native advertising

• Sharing & syndication of native advertising content

• Self-regulation or imposed regulation

Page 26: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

26

Advocate/Influencer Disclosure

• Communicating disclosure policies to program participants

• Identifying the best approach across your advocate eco-system

- Celebrities

- Tier 1 Influencers

- Brand ambassadors

- Contest participants

- Employees

• Reasonable monitoring and follow up practices

Page 27: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

27

Other ConsiderationsUGC/IP/Trademark

• Required content releases

- UGC acquired via social promotion

- UGC identified in the ‘wild’

• Sources and implementation

• Documentation

Brand & Agency Management:

• Standardized process and policies

• Agency & brand policy compliance & oversight

• Sponsored content disclosure & republishing

Page 28: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

Regulatory Examples

Page 29: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

29

First FTC Investigation – Ann Taylor

Ann Taylor LOFT Preview Campaign:

“…Bloggers who attend will receive a special gift, and those who post coverage from the event will be entered in a mystery gift card drawing…”

“…goes against the rules of ethical journalism…”

“…stench of pay-to-play in the wake of FTC disclosure

guidelines.”

“…the [Ann Taylor] case serves to let marketers know that

the FTC is keeping a close eye on their interactions with

bloggers.”

Page 30: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

30

FTC - Ann Taylor LOFT

Facts:

Ann Taylor LOFT invited selected bloggers to a preview event, provided gift cards and

promised to activate the gift cards if an article/review was posted within 24 hours. Some

bloggers failed to disclose they had received free gifts from LOFT.

Issue:

Whether Ann Taylor engaged in deceptive practices where it provided gifts to bloggers who

the company expected would blog about the LOFT division.

Resolution:

FTC closes investigation, and determines not to recommend action, because “LOFT adopted a

written policy . . . stating that LOFT will not issue any gift to any blogger without first telling the

blogger that the blogger must disclose the gift in his or her blog.”

Page 31: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

31

First FTC Enforcement – Reverb

FTC says Reverb engaged in deceptive advertising for not

disclosing that the reviews came from paid employees working

on behalf of the developers.

App Store reviews written by agency with no disclosure

FTC sanctions

agency and agency

owner personally for

engaging in deceptive

advertising

Page 32: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

32

FTC – Reverb Enforcement

Facts:

PR Firm uses employees to post reviews as ordinary consumers.

Issue:

Reviews were not independent; and reviews failed to disclose material connection between

reviewer and employer. Therefore, endorsements were false, misleading, and deceptive.

Resolution:

• Consent Decree with injunctive relief.

• Reporting and compliance provisions for both the agency and owner

• Order lives for 20 years.

Page 33: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

33

FTC Financial Settlement - Legacy

FTC investigation - $250,000

• Program lacked disclosure and monitoring

• Positive endorsements with links to product

• Did not adequately disclose connections

• Misrepresented reviewer compensation

• Would not be reasonably expected by consumers

• Responsible for representations of affiliates

Page 34: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

34

FTC – Legacy Learning SettlementFacts:

Legacy Learning Systems engaged a network of affiliates to promote and market products,

including a DVD set to teach guitar lessons.

Issue:

Affiliates failed to disclose material connections and commission payments. Claims,

endorsements and statements were not being monitored.

Resolution:

• $250,000 penalty on $5mm of sales

• Requirement for reasonable monitoring & process

• Reporting and compliance provisions in place for 20 years

• Responsible for claims, endorsements & disclosure by affiliates

Page 35: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

35

FTC – Hyundai Closing LetterFacts:

During Super Bowl XLV, Hyundai hired a PR firm to build buzz around their Super Bowl

commercial. Bloggers were asked to write about the commercial and were given a gift

certificate.

Issue:

No disclosure that the bloggers received something in exchange for participation in the

promotion.

Resolution:

The FTC issued a closing letter and a blog post with more info

Social media policies of advertiser and agency were both violated by rogue employee

3 M’s Mnemonic

• Mandate a disclosure policy that complies with the law

• Make sure people who work for you or with you know what the rules are

• Monitor what they’re doing on your behalf

Page 36: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

36

FTC – HP/Porter Novelli Closing LetterFacts:

Hewlett Packard engaged a network of advocates through PR firm Porter Novelli to promote

and market products, for a program entitled Inkology.

Issue:

Advocates failed to disclose material connections despite both HP and Porter Novelli having

specific policies requiring the disclosure of such connections

Resolution:

• Closing letter issued

• Disclosures must be reasonable

• Facts matter – size of program a consideration

• Policies protect

Page 37: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

37

FTC – ADT Closing LettersFacts:

ADT engaged “Safety Mom” blogger/influencer to appear on traditional and social media to

discuss ADT Pulse product.

Issue:

Safety Mom failed to disclose material connections in media appearances and posts

discussing and promoting the ADT Pulse product.

Resolution:

• Closing letters issued to ADT, PR agency, talent agency and talent personally.

• ADT prohibited from misrepresenting that any discussion or demonstration of a product or

service is an independent review provided by an impartial expert .

• Misrepresented reviews had to be removed.

Page 38: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

38

FTC – Cole Haan/PinterestFacts:

Cole Haan created a contest on Pinterest encouraging users to submit photos with a theme of

Wandering Sole and include #Wandering Sole to enter to win $1,000.

Issue:

Entry Pins were incentivized with a prize and therefore endorsements requiring material

connection disclosures.

Resolution:

• Closing letter issued

• Contest entries can be considered endorsements requiring disclosure

• Disclosures must be included clearly and conspicuously in messages

• TBD – Would a #Giveaway, #Contest, #Sweeps suffice?

• TBD – Does this apply to other social platforms?

Page 39: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

39

OFT – Handpicked Media

Facts:

Handpicked Media engaged advocates to promote brand marketing initiatives in social media

channels

Issue:

Lack of disclosure in blog posts, Facebook Status Updates and Tweets

Resolution:

• Office of Fair Trading (OFT) settled with Handpicked Media, terms not disclosed.

• ASA to promulgate additional guidance to CAP Codes.

• Disclosure required in all marketing messages, including short-form messages and celebrity

endorsements.

Page 40: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

40

ASA - MercedesFacts:

Mercedes-Benz ran a contest online where the contestant with the most votes wins a van.

Some contestants were soliciting votes in an effort to gain an advantage. One user noticed this

activity, asked company for guidance and received no response. She went ahead and solicited

votes as well after which company changed policies and disqualified all contestants who

solicited votes.

Issue:

Rules for contest did not address manipulation. Delays in replying caused confusion. Change

in rules during contest invalidated contest entries

Resolution:

• Settled by ASA, terms not disclosed.

Page 41: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

41

ASA – Snickers/MARS

Facts:

Snickers (MARS) ran a celebrity campaign consisting of a series of intentionally confusing

Tweets with a reveal at the end

Issue:

Was disclosure required in early (teaser) Tweets and was the #SPON that was used sufficient

as a disclosure

Resolution:

• ASA investigated and settled.

• Disclosure is required.

• The series was considered a consolidated unit, but the timeliness and proximity of

messages was a concern.

Page 42: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

42

ASA - Nike

Page 43: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

43

ASA - Nike

Facts:

Nike had its #makeitcount campaign banned by the ASA for lack of disclosure.

Issue:

Tweets lacked disclosure. Brand assumed that everyone knew that sponsored athletes were

compensated

Resolution:

• Branded Nike URL was not sufficient as a disclosure.

• Cannot assume that “everyone knows” that sponsored athletes are paid.

• Celebrity endorsements require disclosure (no exemption).

• ASA investigated and settled.

• Disclosure is required.

Page 44: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

44

ASA – Toni & Guy (Gemma Collins)

Page 45: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

45

ASA – Toni & Guy (Gemma Collins)

Facts:

Toni & Guy had its Twitter campaign banned by the ASA for lack of disclosure.

Issue:

Tweets lacked disclosure. Celebrity was given a free styling in exchange for promotion of the

salon and a special offer.

Resolution:

• Celebrity endorsements require disclosures (no exemption).

• ASA investigated and settled.

• Disclosure is required.

Page 46: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

46

| |212.717.1414

Tom Chernaik, CEO

[email protected] www.getcommandpost.com

Page 47: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

Overview

Page 48: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

48

Social Strategy Redefined

CommandPost is CMP.LY’s patented Monitoring, Measurement & Insight (MMI) tool

for managed social communications.

• Cross-platform visibility into social media performance

• Actionable insights to evaluate & optimize engagement in real time

• Demonstrate ROI – quantify, benchmark & track the value of assets/initiatives

• Capture strategic value of real-time marketing over time

Insights layer that works in conjunction with existing tools & processes!

Page 49: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

49

Core Benefits

1. Earned Media Value Measurement - Know your (social media) value

2. Owned Media Effectiveness - Redefine your social media strategies

3. Social Advocacy Value - Drive advocacy for your brand

4. Audience Segmentation & Optimization - Understand your audience

5. Deeper Insights With Direct Attribution - Make informed decisions

Page 50: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

50

Applications

Branded Channels

Gain Deeper Insights into Owned Media

Advocates

Own Your Earned Media

Disclosure Solutions

Get Disclosure Right

Page 51: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

51

Insights Layer for In-Depth Platform, Post & Campaign Analysis

Identify Advocates | Segment Audiences | Optimize Content

• Evaluate & optimize your content strategies

• Measure, benchmark & track engagement

• Maximize the value/ROI of your audience, platforms,

content & campaigns

• Know your audience

• Identify potential advocates

• Monitor & manage community health

BRANDED CHANNELS

Page 52: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

52

ADVOCATES

Manage, Measure & Optimize Third-Party Programs at Scale

Advocates & Influencers | Employees | Thought Leaders

• Track real-time program activity across social platforms

• Manage advocates & programs efficiently

• Measure third-party performance & impact

• Evaluate best performing content & platforms

• Optimize & analyze tactics & strategies

• Document & review program activity

• Built-in compliance tools

Page 53: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

53

DISCLOSURE SOLUTIONS

Include Simple, Documented Disclosure in Communications

Regulatory Needs | Policy Compliance | Best Practices

• Make disclosure “clear & conspicuous”

• Use plain language

• Address syndication & character limits

• Disclose directly in the body of a social post

• Have a standardized & documented process

• Works across all platforms – mobile optimized

• Implement best practices

Page 54: CMPLY Updated Regulatory Overview June 2014

54

| |212.717.1414

Tom Chernaik, CEO

[email protected] www.getcommandpost.com