Upload
gagan-sharma
View
336
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Level 1 - Fit
This chapter examines the second level of the operations strategy process – achieving sustainability
Level 2 - Sustainability
Level 3 - Risk
Align resources with requirements
Develop sustainable competitive advantage
Include impact of uncertainty In
crea
sin
g c
om
ple
xity
© Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Lev
el o
f m
arke
t re
qu
irem
ents
Level of operations resource capability
Sustainability is maintaining ‘fit’ whilst extending operations capability and the requirements of the market
Line
of fit
Y
X
A
x2
y2B
Cy1
x1
© Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Quality
Per
form
ance
ob
ject
ives
Capacity Supply Network
Process Technology
Development and
Organization
Resource Usage
Mar
ket
Co
mp
etit
iven
ess
Decision areas
Initial operations strategy matrix for CAG Recycling Services
Speed
Dependability
Flexibility
Cost
X X X
X X X
= Criticalintersections
X
© Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Quality
Per
form
ance
ob
ject
ives
Capacity Supply Network
Process Technology
Development and
Organization
Resource Usage
Mar
ket
Co
mp
etit
iven
ess
Decision areas
Speed
Dependability
Flexibility
Cost
X
X
= Criticalintersections
X
Operations strategy matrix for CAG Recycling Services after acquiring the high volume public authority consortium contract
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
© Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Quality
Per
form
ance
ob
ject
ives
Capacity Supply Network
Process Technology
Development and
Organization
Resource Usage
Mar
ket
Co
mp
etit
iven
ess
Decision areas
Speed
Dependability
Flexibility
Cost
X
X
= Criticalintersections
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Operations strategy matrix for CAG Recycling Services as they anticipated future recycling legislation
X
X
X
© Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Lev
el o
f m
arke
t re
qu
irem
ents
Level of operations resource capability
y1
x1
Fit over time at CAG Recycling Systems
y2
y3
y4
y5
x2 x3 x4
C
F
G
D
E
© Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Value chain relationships
Competitive rivalry
Potential substitutes
Potential new entrants
Difficult to copy
Difficult to move
Scarcity
No substitutes
Achieving sustainability through barriers to entry and imitation
OPERATIONS RESOURCES
MARKET REQUIREMENTS
‘Static’ sustainability – barriers to entry
and imitation
© Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Examine the performance of operations processes
Operations innovation
Develop new insights and capabilities
Compare this performance against objectives
Single-loop learning in operations
© Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Reduced performance of operations processes
Operations innovation less easy
Insights and capabilities less useful
Performance objectives less appropriate
The potential limitations of single-loop learning
Shifts in technology, processes or markets,
leading to improved competitor performance
© Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Double-loop learning questions the appropriateness of operations performance
Operations innovation
Develop new insights and capabilities
Compare this performance against objectives
Question the relevance of objectives
Develop new (more relevant) objectives
Examine the performance of operations processes
© Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Single loop
Double loop
Time
Single and double-loop learning over time
© Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
YY
Quality
Per
form
ance
ob
ject
ives
Capacity Supply Network
Process Technology
Development and
Organization
Resource–based capability trajectories
Req
uir
emen
t-b
ased
m
arke
t tr
ajec
tori
es
Decision areas
Categorising path dependencies using the operations strategy matrix
Speed
Dependability
Flexibility
Cost
Trajectories of development
© Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Performance based on ‘old’
technology
‘Disruptive’ technological
change
Performance required by
‘bottom end’ of the market
Performance based on ‘new’
technology
Performance required by ‘top end’ of the
market
Zone of market-acceptable
performancePerformance of goods and
services based on the
technology
A BTime
‘Disruptive’ technological change (Adapted from Christensen, C.M. (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).