View
212
Download
2
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Feagin J.E., Harrell M.I., Lee J.C., Coe K.J., Sands B.H., Cannone J.J., Tami G., Schnare M.N., and Gutell R.R. (2012). The Fragmented Mitochondrial Ribosomal RNAs of Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS One, 7(6):e38320.
Citation preview
The Fragmented Mitochondrial Ribosomal RNAs ofPlasmodium falciparumJean E. Feagin1*¤a, Maria Isabel Harrell1¤b, Jung C. Lee2¤c, Kevin J. Coe1¤d, Bryan H. Sands1¤e,
Jamie J. Cannone2, Germaine Tami1¤f, Murray N. Schnare3, Robin R. Gutell2
1 Seattle Biomedical Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America, 2 The Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, and the Center for
Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America, 3 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Abstract
Background: The mitochondrial genome in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum is most unusual. Over halfthe genome is composed of the genes for three classic mitochondrial proteins: cytochrome oxidase subunits I and III andapocytochrome b. The remainder encodes numerous small RNAs, ranging in size from 23 to 190 nt. Previous analysisrevealed that some of these transcripts have significant sequence identity with highly conserved regions of large and smallsubunit rRNAs, and can form the expected secondary structures. However, these rRNA fragments are not encoded in linearorder; instead, they are intermixed with one another and the protein coding genes, and are coded on both strands of thegenome. This unorthodox arrangement hindered the identification of transcripts corresponding to other regions of rRNAthat are highly conserved and/or are known to participate directly in protein synthesis.
Principal Findings: The identification of 14 additional small mitochondrial transcripts from P. falcipaurm and the assignmentof 27 small RNAs (12 SSU RNAs totaling 804 nt, 15 LSU RNAs totaling 1233 nt) to specific regions of rRNA are supported bymultiple lines of evidence. The regions now represented are highly similar to those of the small but contiguousmitochondrial rRNAs of Caenorhabditis elegans. The P. falciparum rRNA fragments cluster on the interfaces of the tworibosomal subunits in the three-dimensional structure of the ribosome.
Significance: All of the rRNA fragments are now presumed to have been identified with experimental methods, and nearlyall of these have been mapped onto the SSU and LSU rRNAs. Conversely, all regions of the rRNAs that are known to bedirectly associated with protein synthesis have been identified in the P. falciparum mitochondrial genome and RNAtranscripts. The fragmentation of the rRNA in the P. falciparum mitochondrion is the most extreme example of any rRNAfragmentation discovered.
Citation: Feagin JE, Harrell MI, Lee JC, Coe KJ, Sands BH, et al. (2012) The Fragmented Mitochondrial Ribosomal RNAs of Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS ONE 7(6):e38320. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038320
Editor: Bob Lightowlers, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
Received February 15, 2012; Accepted May 3, 2012; Published June 22, 2012
Copyright: � 2012 Feagin et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permitsunrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: Support for these studies was provided by National Institutes of Health R01 AI40368 and The M. J. Murdoch Charitable Trust (JEF), by grant MOP-11212to Michael W. Gray from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MNS), and National Institutes of Health R01 GM067317 and Welch Foundation F-1427 (RRG).The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
* E-mail: feagin@u.washington.edu
¤a Current address: Departments of Pharmacy and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America¤b Current address: Center for Childhood Infections and Prematurity Research, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America¤c Current address: Department of Physics and Chemistry, Milwaukee School of Engineering, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America¤d Current address: Drug Discovery, Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Johnson and Johnson, San Diego, California, United States of America¤e Current address: Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America¤f Current address: Atlantic Research Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Introduction
The human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum has a most
unusual mitochondrial (mt) genome. It consists of tandem repeats
of a 5967 nt sequence which encodes open reading frames similar
to the genes for cytochrome c oxidase subunits I and III (cox1 and
cox3) and apocytochrome b (cob) of other organisms [1]. Mt DNAs
also characteristically encode the rRNAs needed for mt translation
[2]. While sequences similar to regions of large subunit (LSU) and
small subunit (SSU) rRNAs are encoded by the P. falciparum mt
genome, they are scattered across both strands of the genome,
interspersed with each other and the protein coding genes, and
correspond to small RNAs [3,4]. Fragmented rRNAs have been
reported from other organisms [5–13] and in some instances, most
notably for Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mitochondria [5], the
fragments are encoded out of order with each other. However,
the Chlamydomonas mt rRNA fragments correspond to the majority
of the eubacterial rRNA structure while those of Plasmodium species
map to a smaller percentage of the bacterial rRNA. The
Caenorhabditis elegans mt rRNAs [14] and those of kinetoplastid
protozoans [15–18] are very small but are composed of continuous
LSU and SSU rRNAs. The combination of a high degree of
fragmentation and the small size of the fragments makes the P.
falciparum mt rRNAs among the most unusual described.
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 1 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
The features of a particularly small mt genome with just three
protein coding genes and highly fragmented mt rRNAs appear to
be conserved among the phylum Apicomplexa, to which P.
falciparum belongs. The mt DNA sequence has been determined for
numerous species of Plasmodium, which demonstrate strong overall
conservation. The sequence and transcription of the mt genome of
the rodent parasite Plasmodium yoelii have been examined in some
depth [19,20], demonstrating the same structural and genetic
organization as for P. falciparum. Mt genomes of other Plasmodium
species, while not as thoroughly analyzed, share these character-
istics [21] (also described in this work), as do related species.
Theileria parva is an apicomplexan cattle parasite having a ,6.6 kb
mt genome [22,23]. The same three protein coding genes are
present as in P. falciparum and a few rRNA fragments correspond-
ing to domains IV and V of the LSU rRNA have been assigned by
sequence analysis in T. parva [23]. The gene order for the T. parva
mt genome differs from that of Plasmodium, however, as does the
physical form of the genome. The Plasmodium mt genome occurs in
tandem repeats but the T. parva mt genome consists of single linear
copies of the genome bounded by inverted repeat sequences [23].
The mt genomes of additional Theileria species and of several
Babesia species [24] have also been sequenced and are similar in
character to that of T. parva, consistent with these genera both
being in Piroplasmida. Those of Eimeria tenella, a coccidian, have
much the same genes but show a third variation on mt gene order
[25]. The mt genomes of Hepatocystis, Leucocytozoon, and Hemoproteus
species, lesser known apicomplexans, closely resemble Plasmodium
mt genomes in structure and content [26]; they and Plasmodium
species are all members of Order Haemosporidia. Highly
fragmented mt rRNAs thus appear to be a common feature of
apicomplexans.
Assignment of fragmented rRNAs based on DNA sequence
similarities alone can be misleading. Consequently, evidence that
the P. falciparum mt rRNA-like sequences are transcribed is an
important factor in establishing their potential as components of
functional mt ribosomes. We have previously reported a total of 20
small transcripts mapping to the P. falciparum mt genome [4]. They
range from 40 to 195 nt in length and many carry non-coded
oligo(A) tails of unknown function [27,28]. A majority of the small
RNAs are similar to regions of rRNA sequences from other
organisms [3,4], although they are encoded in the mt genome out
of linear order with respect to conventional rRNAs. Taken
together, they comprise many of the highly conserved sequences in
rRNAs. However, RNAs corresponding to many regions of the
rRNAs were not previously detected, including the GTPase center
in domain II of the LSU rRNA. The two candidate sequences
initially thought to comprise that region were each predicted to be
,100 nt long [3] but evidence for transcripts in that size range
was not found [4]. With the recent proliferation of large-scale
sequencing projects, small transcripts complementary to mt DNA
have been reported from P. falciparum cDNA libraries, and the
similarity of some of these to rRNA regions has been noted [29].
Detailed crystallographic data for ribosomes and ribosomal
subunits have become available in recent years, greatly assisting
our understanding of the functional correlates of rRNA and
protein structures. In 2000, Ban et al. [30], Wimberly et al. [31],
and Schuenzen et al. [32] published high-resolution three-
dimensional crystal structures of the Haloarcula marismortui large
subunit and the Thermus thermophilus small subunit of the ribosome,
respectively. A year later, Yusupov et al. [33] published the
structure of the assembled T. thermophilus 70S ribosome. More
detailed structural analyses have followed, including lower
resolution analyses of the mammalian [34,35] and C. elegans [36]
mt ribosomes and mammalian cytoplasmic ribosomes [37]. More
recently, higher resolution three-dimensional structures of two
eucaryotic cytoplasmic small ribosomal subunits were published,
from Saccharomyces cerevisiae [38] and Tetrahymena thermophila [39].
The mechanism of action of antibiotics has been structurally
probed [40–42], the mechanism of peptide bond formation has
been evaluated [43–49], specific interactions between rRNA and
protein components of ribosomes have been assessed [50–53], and
the structure of the polypeptide exit tunnel has been revealed [54].
This wealth of structural data, augmented with comparative
information that reveals patterns of sequence and structure
conservation [55], provides a framework for further evaluation
of the unusual Plasmodium rRNAs.
We here report mapping an additional 14 small transcripts to
the P. falciparum mt genome, yielding a total of 34 such transcripts
(Figure 1). Using multiple analyses, we have identified 27 of them
as rRNA fragments assigned to specific regions of SSU and LSU
rRNA. The regions represented are highly similar to the small but
contiguous mt rRNAs of C. elegans, and are consistent with a
functional role in mt protein synthesis for these highly fragmented
rRNAs.
Results
Plasmodium mt DNA ConservationComplete (or nearly complete) mt genome sequences are
currently available for 25 species and one Plasmodium isolate
collected from a mandrill, and for eight species in four related
genera of hemosporidians (Table S1). All of them have the same
order and orientation of the protein coding genes and the
remaining sequence is highly conserved. We aligned representative
sequences from each Plasmodium species, the Plasmodium isolate, and
the related hemosporidians, later adding mt DNA sequences from
another 184 Plasmodium mt DNAs (Table S1). Based on the
alignments, the closest relatives of P. falciparum are parasites of
chimpanzees: P. reichenowi, P. billcollinsi, and P. billbrayi, the latter
two being recently suggested species [56]. (Gorillas harbor a
parasite that appears even more closely related to P. falciparum [57]
but a full mt DNA sequence is not available.) The mt DNA
sequences of the three chimpanzee parasites are 97.4%, 94.2%,
and 91.7% identical to that of P. falciparum (M76611), respectively.
The mt DNAs of other primate malarias, including the human
parasites P. vivax, P. ovale, P. malariae, P. knowlesi, and multiple
species that parasitize monkeys, are 87.3%–89.1% identical to P.
falciparum. Those of rodent, lizard, and avian malaria parasites are
87.8%–88.3% identical to P. falciparum. The conservation of the
non-Plasmodium hemosporidian mt DNAs relative to that of P.
falciparum is 82.6%–86.8%. Some of the variation reflects minor
size differences among the mt genomes (Table S1). Much reflects
silent or conservative substitutions in the three protein coding
genes.
Variations between individual sequences may represent poly-
morphisms or sequencing errors instead of real differences. Mt
genomes have been sequenced from numerous geographically
distinct P. falciparum [58,59] and P. vivax lines [60]. There are
comparatively few polymorphic sites within these species, princi-
pally silent substitutions in the protein coding genes. There is far
less redundancy of mt DNA data from other Plasmodium species;
for some species, only a single sequence is available. However,
some of those less-represented species are very closely related; for
example, the mt DNA sequences of P. cynomolgi, P. fieldi, and P.
simiovale are ,99% identical to that of P. vivax so shared variation is
likely real. Some of the sequence variation reflects single nt
differences in just one of the species. Prudence is warranted when
interpreting these as they may be idiosyncratic to a specific isolate
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 2 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
or may reflect sequencing errors. Many of the mt DNAs were
generated by PCR amplification, adding another possible source
for variation. Additionally, the PCR-generated mt genomes
typically lack a 50–100 nt region. Because the P. falciparum mt
genome is tandemly repeated, PCR amplification with neighbor-
ing divergent primers yields a nearly complete genome, missing
only the sequence between the primers. Sequences generated from
different isolates or species in the same study lack the same region
so these presumably reflect primer location. Such mt DNA
sequences were included in our analyses, with the missing
sequence ignored. We did not include other partial or incomplete
mt genome sequences in our analyses.
The size of the complete Plasmodium mt genomes varies from
5864 nt (P. billcollinsi and P. billbrayi) to 6014 nt (P. juxtanucleare).
The differences relate primarily to nt additions/deletions at the
junctions between genes–both mRNAs and small RNAs–or in the
281 nt of apparently non-coding sequence. This is so marked that
gaps in sequence alignments almost always correspond to the
mapped locations of transcript ends (Table 1). Other hemospor-
idian mt genome lengths range from 5935 nt (L. sabrasezi) to
6684 nt (L. majoris), except for Hepatocystis, which has substantial
insertions relative to the other mt genomes (discussed below). For
each, most of the variation between sequences is due to differences
at the junctions between genes. Many of the alignment gaps occur
at an A run, with the number of 39 A residues (or T for the
complementary strand) in mt DNAs often differing between
species. Nearly all of the P. falciparum small RNAs are
oligoadenylated after transcription so differences in the number
of encoded A residues at the 39 end of an RNA may not matter.
Addition of A residues post-transcriptionally may thus render the
RNAs more similar among the species than are their genes.
More substantial size variation occurs at some sites, creating
gaps in the alignment (Table S2). The twelve largest gaps include
six at the junction of genes transcribed from different strands and
six with both genes on the same strand. The largest of the gaps is
found between the cox1 and cob ORFs, separated by 20 nt in P.
falciparum but by 94 in Hepatocystis. Transcript mapping has shown
that the P. falciparum cox1 and cob transcripts are immediately
adjacent [27]. If that is also the case in Hepatocystis, the
untranslated regions (UTRs) for one or both transcripts would
be larger than some of the small mt RNAs. A thirteenth gap is a
51 nt insertion in the Hepatocystis cob ORF toward the 39 end. The
insertion maps to the 39 end of LSUB, and may or may not be
included in the Hepaptocystis LSUB RNA. If included, it would be a
39 tail for LSUB, and easily accomodated in the structure. The
potential effect on COB is greater. The Hepatocystis amino acid
sequence is well-conserved relative to that of Plasmodium prior to
and following the insertion. The DNA sequence of the insertion
contains two stop codons but it seems unlikely that it is an intron.
These are not common in mt-encoded genes and there is no other
evidence for introns in apicomplexan mt genomes. Alternate
explanations are that Hepatocystis has a truncated but functional
COB, or that the stop codons reflect sequence errors. (Since only
one Hepatocystis sequence is available, the latter explanation seems
quite plausible.) The inserted sequence, if translated, would have a
hydrophobic character, consistent with the membrane protein
COB, and the LSUB RNA would be unaffected, other than a
possible tail.
In several cases, some or all of the gap sequence is highly
conserved among species. A run of 13 nt in the gap between cox3
and LSUF is conserved in all the species we examined, as are
seven of the eight nt immediately adjacent to LSUF. Of 21 nt
between RNA6 and RNA12, 15 are conserved in all the species we
examined. Even when there is not broad sequence conservation,
there tends to be conservation among closely related species,
consistent with related hosts (Table S1). However, species with the
same size of intergenic region (Table S2) do not necessarily have
the same sequence.
A handful of sites have 4–7 nt discontinuities in the alignment;
these are invariably located at the 39 or 59 end of a gene.
Differences in nt sequence also tend to cluster near the ends of the
small RNAs and in the intergenic regions. RNA10, which is
assigned to the sarcin ricin loop (SRL) is the principal exception
(Figure S1). The 39 part of RNA10 contains the SRL as part of a
Figure 1. Schematic map of the P. falciparum mt genome. A schematic map of the 6 kb element is shown, with genes above or below the linedepending on direction of transcription (orange arrows: left to right above the line and right to left below). Because the P. falciparum mt genome istandemly repeated, the endpoints shown are the endpoints of Genbank submission M76611, rather than actual structure. Protein coding genes areindicated by white boxes, small mt rDNA sequences are shown with blue (SSU rRNA) and green (LSU rRNA) boxes and labels, and the locations ofRNA23t-RNA27t are indicated with red arrows and labels. Gene abbreviations: cox1 and cox3, cytochrome c oxidase subunits I and III; cob, cytochromeb; LA-LG, LSU rRNA fragments; SA-SF, SSU rRNA fragments; 1–22, RNA1-RNA22; 23t-27t, RNA23t-RNA27t.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038320.g001
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 3 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
Table 1. P. falciparum small mt RNA mapping and identification.
geneaP. falciparum M76611b
coordinatesT. parva Z23263coordinates
Raabe, et al. 29
cDNAscsize RNA/DNA(P. falciparum)d subunit/ordere
SSUA 2023-1916 3666-3561 mtR_6043/27 125/108 SSU/4
SSUB 505-390 4182-4074 none complete 116/116 SSU/6
SSUD 5446-5379 3800-3733 mtR_111/36 65/68 SSU/10
SSUE 1638-1680* 2095-2057 mtR_215/7 40/42 SSU/11
SSUF 5507-5447 1840-1900 mtR_11b/1105 74,58/61 SSU/12
LSUA 5201-5026 4073-3906 none complete 175/176 LSU/1
LSUB 4618*-4586 3667-3691 mtR_143/27 30/29 LSU/3
LSUC 225*-204 1824-1839 mtR_203/2 23/22 LSU/4
LSUD 5854-5772 3114-3196 mtR_5773a/31 85/83 LSU/8
LSUE 5771-5577 3199-3377 none complete 190/195 LSU/9
LSUF 1516-1630 3507-3395 none complete 125,110/115 LSU/11
LSUG 389-283 5667-5775 mtR_36a/221 110/107 LSU/12
RNA1 593-506 3827-3905 mtR_19/19 95/88 LSU/6
RNA2 1698-1763 3098-3032 mtR_69c/15 75/67 LSU/2
RNA3 1830-1910 5658-5584 mtR_5713a/91 85/81 LSU/7
RNA4 4625-4696 mtR_37a/410 75/72
RNA5 4716-4802 mtR_5822/61 92/87 SSU/9
RNA6 4808-4865 1643-1584 mtR_92/41 58/58 LSU/15
RNA7 5283-5202 1678-1758 mtR_5837/69 94/82
RNA8 5954-5855 3031-2940 mtR_41/38 115/100 SSU/5
RNA9 72-125 4211-4183 mtR_182b/7 62/54 SSU/8
RNA10 724-625 4359-4301 mtR_140a/29 100/100 LSU/13
RNA11 5340-5284 2300-2240 mtR_14a/12 78/57 LSU/5
RNA12 4887-4945 mtR_52b/35 68/59 SSU/2
RNA13 5025-4996 4401-4373 mtR_5844/63 48/30 LSU/10
RNA14 5546-5508 2039-1997 mtR_11c/62 40/39 SSU/1
RNA15 624-594 1759-1790 mtR_76b/163 40/31
RNA16 3-33 mtR_60/21 ?/31
RNA17 126-165 2192-2154 mtR_18a/132 ?/40 SSU/3
RNA18 4964-4988 1518-1494 mtR_104/23 ?/25 LSU/14
RNA19 5576-5547 mtR_42/9 ?/30 SSU/7
RNA20 34-71 mtR_86/15 54/38
RNA21 1807*-1829 mtR_26/26 ?/23
RNA22 5378-5341 mtR_59/124 ?/38
RNA23t 171-203 mtR_21/182
RNA24t 262-224 mtR_39/36
RNA25t 283-262 mtR_40b/15
RNA26t 1764-1806 mtR_49/72
RNA27t 4138-4085 mtR_84/122
aNaming convention reflects history of identification [4]. RNA23t through RNA27t are tentative assignments. We have not detected them in RNA blotting experiments,but sequence conservation and comparative abundance of cDNAs [29] suggest they are mature RNAs or abundant processing products.b59 ends are based on primer extension data, except for RNA1 (RNase protection), RNAs 9 and 14–22 (59 RACE), and RNA21 (Raabe, et al. [29] cDNAs and sequenceconservation). 39 ends were determined by 39 RACE except for SSUE, LSUB, and LSUC (inferred from 59 end location and transcript size). We have confirming RNaseprotection data for many of the 59 and 39 ends. *, coordinates inferred.ccDNAs corresponding to mapped P. falciparum mt RNAs. Each designation is name/number of cDNAs.dThe observed size from denaturing polyacrylamide gels is noted for the RNA size, compared to the gene size (DNA) based on the location of 59 and 39 ends. ?, RNAidentified by RACE, not blotting.eAssignment of P. falciparum small mt RNAs to large and small subunit rRNAs; numbers indicate linear order relative to conventional rRNAs.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038320.t001
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 4 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
43 nt sequence block that is nearly identical among Plasmodium
species. A 13 nt block at the 59 end of RNA10 is identical among
species. Between these sites, there is considerable variation,
including additions/deletions. Overall, the mt DNAs of Plasmodium
and related hemosporidians are very highly conserved.
Identification of Additional P. Falciparum Small mt RNAsThe GTPase center of the ribosome plays a crucial role in
translocation so assignment of corresponding RNA fragments is a
necessity to postulate a functional mt ribosome. Our attempts to
locate such fragments by northern blot analysis were initially
based on the expectation from sequence analysis that these
RNAs would be ,100 nt long; these attempts were unsuccessful
[4]. One alternate possibility was that other small RNAs from the
mt DNA might encode the GTPase functions. However, none of
the five RNAs that were unassigned to specific regions of rRNA
at that time appeared similar to the GTPase center sequences
[4]. Completion of the mt genome sequence from several other
Plasmodium species provided another means to look for small
RNAs. When we aligned the mt DNAs of Plasmodium species, we
found 100% conservation in two short regions which were
similar to the GTPase center: a region 26 nt long for helix
H1057 and 16 nt long for helix H1087 (Figure S2A). We
therefore re-examined transcription for these very small, highly
conserved regions using oligonucleotide probes complementary to
the conserved sequences. The result was detection in P. falciparum
RNA of a ,30 nt RNA (LSUB) and a ,23 nt RNA (LSUC) for
the 26 and 16 nt conserved regions, respectively (Figure S2B).
We believe that, despite their very small size, these RNAs
provide the GTPase center of the Plasmodium mt ribosome.
The difficulties we encountered in detecting the GTPase center
RNAs suggested that other small RNAs might have been missed in
prior studies. The nucleotide sequences of regions known to
encode putative rRNA fragments are typically conserved among
Plasmodium species at 90% or greater (Table S3). In comparison,
while the amino acid sequences of the three protein genes are
conserved at .95% among these species, the nucleotide sequence
for the mRNAs is only ,85% conserved (Table S3). These data
provided a criterion for re-examination of P. falciparum mt
transcripts. We analyzed all apparently non-coding mt sequences
.15 nt long that were conserved at ,90% or better among
Plasmodium species. By RNA blotting and hybridization (Table S4),
we found additional transcripts: RNA11 (assigned to LSU rRNA),
RNA12 and RNA14 (both assigned to SSU rRNA), RNA15, and
RNA16 (Figure S3). Comparison of the P. falciparum and T. parva
mt DNAs suggested another possible LSU rRNA fragment, and
RNA blotting confirmed the presence of a small RNA, now
labeled RNA13 (Figure S3). We also evaluated small regions of
very high conservation by 59 and 39 RACE (Table S4), confirming
six additional RNAs under 40 nt long: RNA17 and RNA19 (both
assigned to SSU rRNA), RNA18 (assigned to LSU rRNA),
RNA20, RNA21, and RNA22 (Table 1).
After completion of our transcript mapping but prior to
completion of our sequence analysis, Raabe et al. [29] published
an analysis of non-protein coding RNAs identified from size-
selected P. falciparum cDNA libraries. They reported .100 such
RNAs corresponding to the mt genome. We analyzed their data
with ours, comparing the location of transcript ends and, for
those for which RNA blots were shown, whether the observed
transcripts were consistent with the expected size of the small
RNAs and their potential precursors. They found cDNAs
corresponding to all the small RNAs we identified (Table 1),
though their cDNAs for LSUE (190 nt), LSUA (175 nt), LSUF
(125 nt), and SSUB (116 nt) are not full-length and cDNAs for
some of the others have minor variance in 59 and 39 ends. Many
of the remaining cDNAs lack 59 and/or 39 ends consistent with
our mapped transcript ends, some include parts of adjacent small
RNAs, and all were represented by just a few copies each (,10).
In contrast, cDNAs corresponding to the RNAs we mapped
typically were abundant (.10 to 1000 copies), except that some
of the smallest RNAs were poorly represented (LSUC, SSUE,
and RNA19 each have ,10 cDNAs). The abundance of a
particular cDNA is not reliably diagnostic of the corresponding
RNA abundance. However, correlation of our mapped tran-
scripts to the more abundant cDNAs [29] is suggestive. We
believe that the less abundant cDNAs may be products of RNA
degradation or breakage during experimental manipulation.
With identification of these new small RNAs, only 4.2% of the
P. falciparum mt genome–251 of 5967 nt, spread across 15 sites–
lacked mature transcripts. The two largest sites are the 38 nt 39
and 58 nt 59 flanks of LSUC. These include a 26 nt block and a
14 nt block, respectively, in which the sequence is identical among
the Plasmodium species and the other hemosporidians. Although we
did not find evidence for mature RNAs derived from these
sequences, Raabe, et al. [29] reported small RNAs from both
regions (mtR_21 on the 39 flank, and mtR_39 and mtR_40b on
the 59 flank). Similarly, they reported a cDNA (mtR_49)
corresponding to the 43 nt between RNA2 and RNA21; sequence
conservation for this area is low (81.8%) but the variance is largely
confined to the 59 third of the region. A 28 nt region between cox3
and LSUF is well-conserved among the Plasmodium species
(94.1%). The 39 15 nt of the region are included in an apparent
long-lived precursor RNA for LSUF, as discussed below. The
remaining intergenic regions range from 3–21 nt and conservation
is typically 50–70% (Table S2). Lower conservation suggests a lack
of (conserved) function.
Five of the cDNAs [29] map to well-conserved sequences where
we did not find evidence for RNAs; they are represented by .10
cDNAs, and have transcripts of size consistent with the proposed
coding region and with processing from precursor transcripts. As
noted above, four flank mapped rRNAs and the fifth (mtR_84) is
complementary to part of the cob gene. Although we did not detect
these transcripts, their characteristics are consistent with them
being at least long-lived processing intermediates and some may be
mature mt RNAs. We have tentatively named them RNA23t
through RNA27t (Table 1).
With the possible addition of several RNAs identified by Raabe,
et al. [29], all of the small RNAs that derive from the P. falciparum
mt genome have apparently been identified. The rRNA fragments
total 2037 nt, the seven unassigned RNAs sum to 328 nt, and
three mRNAs cover 3351 nt. Together, they account for 95.3% of
the 5967 nt P. falciparum mt genome. (Overlapping sequences are
only counted once.) However, it is difficult to be absolutely certain.
Including the Raabe RNAs would raise coverage to 97.6% of the
genome. Additionally, it is clear from the search for GTPase
center rRNAs that transcripts can be as short as 23 nt; these are
not easily detected. Further, the LSUB fragment overlaps
completely the 39 end of the cob gene (but not the previously
mentioned Hepatocystis insertion) on the opposite strand of DNA
(Figure 1). This opens the possibility of alternate strand coding for
other small RNAs; Raabe et al. [29] report several of these but only
one (mtR_84) appears to be plausible. While we have tested all
regions of the P. falciparum mt genome for transcripts on both
strands, not all have been subjected to the more rigorous scrutiny
used to detect the GTPase center fragments. These caveats aside,
we have mapped 34 small RNAs encoded by the P. falciparum mt
genome, 27 of which have been assigned to specific regions of
rRNA (Table 1).
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 5 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
Transcript MappingA total of three protein coding genes and 20 small RNAs have
been previously shown by RNA blotting to derive from the P.
falciparum mt genome [3,4,27,28,61]; to these we have now added
14 more small RNAs. The genes on the P. falciparum mt genome
are closely packed (Figure 1) and both DNA strands are
polycistronically transcribed, with individual transcripts presumed
to be cleavage products from the precursor [62]. To assist
evaluation of the predicted secondary structure and potential
interactions of the rRNA fragments, we mapped the 59 and 39 ends
of the small transcripts. Identifying the 39 end is especially
important for the P. falciparum mt RNAs since most have non-
encoded oligo(A) tails up to 25 nt long [27] and therefore the RNA
size on blots often exceeds the size of the corresponding DNA
sequence. We have previously reported the 39 ends, including
oligo(A) tails, of some of the small mt RNAs [4] and here identify
the 39 ends and oligoadenylation status for most of the remaining
RNAs (Table S5).
The 39 ends of the P. falciparum small RNAs were identified by 39
RACE, augmented in some cases by RNase protection. The
oligo(A) tails are often too short for priming cDNA synthesis with
oligo(dT) so for 39 RACE, we enzymatically added 39 C tails to
total RNA. This was followed by cDNA synthesis primed with
oligo(dG), then PCR amplification with oligo(dG) and gene-
specific 59 primers [28]. The PCR products obtained were cloned
and sequenced, revealing the presence of non-encoded As at the 39
end of most of the small transcripts (Table S5). The length of the A
tail is variable but tends to be generally characteristic for each
transcript; that is, most cDNAs for specific small RNAs have short
A tails while those for others have predominantly long A tails
(Table S5). SSUB lacks added 39 A residues [28] and, with the
possible exceptions of SSUE, LSUB, and LSUC (see below), is the
only small mt RNA that lacks an oligo(A) tail. The significance of
oligo(A) tail presence and size is unknown. Oligoadenylation of mt
rRNAs has been previously reported for mammals and insects
[63–65] but not examined in detail. The phenomenon may simply
reflect a promiscuous mt poly(A) polymerase activity.
We obtained 59 end locations by primer extension, RNase
protection, or 59 RACE; in many cases, more than one mode was
used. These data are straightforward with two exceptions. The
LSUF rRNA, which corresponds to part of the peptidyltransferase
domain of LSU rRNA, has two transcripts detected on RNA blots
[4] and two primer extension products (Figure S4); the size
difference in each case is 15 nt. The precise relationship between
the two transcripts is unknown. The larger transcript could
represent an abundant RNA processing intermediate or both sizes
of the RNA could be functional, possibly in different roles. (We are
unaware of any examples of the latter.) It is notable that the 15 nt
59 extension of the larger transcript is less conserved among
Plasmodium species (,70%) than the remainder of the LSUF RNA
(98%), due to considerable variability in the first seven nt (Figure
S4). Sequence corresponding to the conserved section of LSUF has
been identified in T. parva [23], but there sequence corresponding
to the 15 nt extension is not conserved. On balance, these data
better support the hypothesis that the larger RNA is an abundant
precursor. (Probes for SSUF also detect two sizes of transcript on
RNA blots [4] but neither primer extension nor 39 RACE supports
an extension such as that seen for LSUF. This may reflect that
different oligonucleotides used for the RNA blot, 39 RACE, and
primer extension might have differential ability to hybridize to
both RNAs; that hybridization dynamics differ for blot hybridiza-
tion compared to solution hybridization; or that the RNA blot
probe cross-hybridizes to another small RNA.) The second
exception involves the 59 end of RNA21, for which detection of
apparent precursor transcripts by 59 RACE both enlightens and
complicates data interpretation, as discussed below.
Mapping for three of the small RNAs posed technical challenges
that we were not able to overcome. The 40 nt SSUE RNA
includes a near-universally conserved 16 nt sequence, GUACA-
CACCGCUCGUC. Except for the underlined U, this exactly
matches the corresponding sequences from the genome of the P.
falciparum apicoplast (a relict plastid that encodes its own rRNAs
[66]) and the nuclear encoded SSU rRNAs. The small size of the
transcript limits options for positioning primers and attempts at 39
and 59 RACE for SSUE using total RNA have failed, likely due to
cross-hybridization of the primers to these other rRNAs. Use of mt
RNA would theoretically alleviate this problem. However,
methods for isolation of P. falciparum mitochondria [67,68] provide
relatively crude fractionation. We have found RNA from such
organelle preparations to be significantly contaminated with non-
mt sequences, and were unable to obtain an SSUE 59 RACE
product from the ‘‘mt’’ RNA. Primer extension produced multiple
products, some of which also may reflect cross-hybridization to
other P. falciparum rRNAs. Consequently, the 59 and 39 ends of
SSUE are predictions, based on the following observations:
N Radiolabeled probes complementary to SSUE detect a 40 nt
transcript [4].
N SSUE size does not alter following digestion with RNase H in
the presence of oligo(dT), suggesting that the transcript lacks a
significant oligo(A) tail [28].
N 59 RACE for RNA21 produced long products which appear to
derive from partially processed precursor transcripts. Two
clones have a 59 end at 1631 and two at 1638. The LSUF 39
end from 39 RACE maps to 1630 [28] and the 41 nt conserved
region starts at 1638 (Figure S5A).
N SSUE is encoded in a 64 nt region between LSUF and RNA2.
A 41 nt portion of that region is 100% conserved among
Plasmodium species and varies very little in the other
hemosporidians. It differs from the other P. falciparum SSU
rRNAs at just two sites in the 39 half. The conserved region is
flanked by seven slightly variable nt at the 59 end and the 18 nt
39 flank is poorly conserved among Plasmodium species.
N The 41 nt conserved sequence fits well into the expected
secondary structure for this region of SSU rRNA, including
maintenance of highly conserved sequence and capacity to
form helices with portions of SSUB and SSUF, creating a
reasonably conventional secondary structure (Figure 2). How-
ever, the final 18 nt of the 64 nt region would not be predicted
to participate in a helix with other small mt RNAs.
Taking these points together, it is likely that SSUE is
encompassed within the 41 nt highly conserved sequence, with
its 59 end at 1638 and the 39 end at 1680, and few, if any, As added
at its 39 end.
Mapping LSUB and LSUC presented a different challenge. For
RACE, at least one primer must be gene-specific and success is
enhanced if nested gene-specific primers can be used. However,
the LSUB and LSUC transcripts are only 30 and 23 nt,
respectively, so the gene-specific primers are severely limited.
That the primers must be small means in turn that temperatures in
the initial rounds of PCR must be comparatively low, with
accompanying loss of specificity. Despite multiple attempts, we
have been unable to obtain RACE products for these RNAs.
Given the relative size of the transcripts and their highly conserved
sequence, any 39 oligo(A) residues would likely be too few in
number for successful RNase H analysis for A tails. Based on
conservation of sequence between the Plasmodium species, between
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 6 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
Figure 2. SSU rRNA secondary structure. The P. falciparum mt SSU rRNA secondary structure model is superimposed onto the E. coli SSU rRNAsecondary structure model diagram. Regions where P. falciparum has no structure equivalent to E. coli are shown using gray circles and lines. Colorednucleotides compare the P. falciparum sequence to the Three Phylogenetic Domains/Two Organelles (aka 3P2O) consensus sequence from the Gutelllab’s Comparative RNA Web (CRW) Site [URL for CRW Site: http://www.rna.ccbb.utexas.edu/. URL for 16S rRNA conservation diagram: http://www.rna.ccbb.utexas.edu/SAE/2B/ConsStruc/Diagrams/cons.16.3.3DOM.pdf]. Upper case colored nucleotides are conserved in at least 98% of the sequences
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 7 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
P. falciparum and T. parva, and the size of the transcripts, we have
predicted the likely 59 and 39 ends as 4618 and 4586 for LSUB and
225 and 204 for LSUC, respectively (Table 1).
Transcription and ProcessingMt genomes are often polycistronically transcribed, then
cleaved to release mature RNAs [69]. We have previously
reported evidence for extensive polycistronic transcription of the
P. falciparum mt genome, including RNase protection data
consistent with multigenic precursor transcripts and detection of
overlapping, near-genome length RT-PCR products [62]. During
RACE analysis of the P. falciparum mt small RNAs, we obtained
additional evidence in support of polycistronic transcription. As
noted above, 59 RACE with a gene-specific primer for RNA21
generated products that assisted identification of the SSUE 59 end.
Additional products mapped to nt 1754, 1764, 1765, and 1766 of
P. falciparum mt DNA (Figure S5A). The 39 end of RNA21 maps to
nt 1829 (Table 1) but we were unable to detect RNA21 by blotting
so could not use transcript size to assist the analysis. Gaps in the mt
DNA alignment, combined with cDNA data [29], suggest there
are two transcripts between RNA2 and RNA3. One is RNA21
(mtR-26), a 23 nt transcript with only two variable sites, and the
other is RNA26t (mtR_49), a 43 nt RNA that is .90% conserved
at all but seven residues toward the 59 end. RNA2, RNA26t,
RNA21, and RNA3 are immediately adjacent to each other in P.
falciparum but there are 1–2 nt gaps or insertions in many other
species, located at the predicted junctions. Ironically, the primer
chosen for RNA21 overlapped its 59 end, but that end was
identified from analysis of apparent precursors. The 59 RACE
products mapping to 1764–1766 likely derive from the cleavage
that produces the 39 end of RNA2/59 end of RNA26t, followed by
minor nibbling. (Position 1754 maps within RNA2 and we suspect
it reflects an artifact.).
RNA16 and RNA20 abut each other and are transcribed from
the same DNA strand (Figure 1). While performing 39 RACE
using a gene-specific primer for RNA16, we obtained two sizes of
PCR product. One corresponded to RNA16, including its oligo(A)
tail and the other included RNA16 with no A tail followed by
RNA20, which had an oligo(A) tail (Figure S5B). Similarly, when
performing 59 RACE with a gene-specific primer for RNA20, we
identified not only the 59 end of RNA20 but also obtained longer
products consisting of the expected RNA20 sequences plus all of
RNA16 (Figure S5B). These data imply that 39 cleavage and
oligoadenylation of RNA20 can precede the corresponding step
for RNA16 and that the 59 end of RNA16 can form prior to its 39
end.
The accumulated mapping data have allowed us to identify
possible sites of cleavage in the putative precursor transcript. One
caveat exists for this analysis; if the 39 end of an RNA maps to an
A residue, it is ambiguous whether that A derives from the DNA
sequence or from addition of the oligo(A) tail. Unless there is data
suggesting otherwise, we have assumed that 39 end A residues with
corresponding DNA sequence are encoded rather than added by
poly(A) polymerase. Based on this criterion, many of the mtRNAs
directly abut each other. Indeed, in almost every instance in which
genomic As are found at the junction between genes, it appears
most likely that they are part of the transcript of the upstream
gene. We have identified one exception. At the junction of RNA14
and SSUF (Figure 1), 39 RACE shows that RNA14 has an oligo(A)
tail (Table S5) and there are three A residues at the junction
between the two genes. Our default interpretation would assign
those As to RNA14. However, 59 RACE shows that SSUF starts at
those A residues. Unless the genes overlap, which is not seen
elsewhere in this genome for genes on the same DNA strand (but
see below), all of the As at the 39 end of RNA14 must be added
rather than encoded. Similarly, the junction of RNA1 and SSUB
lies in a run of four As. 59 RACE for SSUB showed some
transcripts starting with two As and some with three. The number
of encoded As at the 39 end of RNA1 is therefore uncertain, but
addition of the A tail renders this moot.
Ribosomal RNAs are typically derived by cleavage from a
polycistronic precursor RNA, often via sequential steps. We have
previously demonstrated the existence of near-genome length
polycistronic transcripts of the P. falciparum mt genome [62],
suggesting a role for cleavage to produce individual P. falciparum mt
RNAs. The mapping data indicate that there are four sets of
abutted genes, with four to 12 members per set (Table S6). For
these, a single cleavage event would suffice to create the 59 end of
one RNA and the 39 end of its neighbor. Polycistronic
transcription of close-packed genes, followed by cleavage to
produce individual mRNAs, is a common feature of mt genomes.
In vertebrates, most mt genes are flanked by tRNAs, and
production of mature mRNAs and rRNAs goes hand-in-hand
with tRNA processing [69]. A similar mechanism would be
consistent with the accumulated P. falciparum data. However, the P.
falciparum mt genome does not encode tRNAs so another
mechanism must guide cleavages. The junctions between
transcripts do not share any obvious specific features with each
other or with the 59 or 39 end sequences immediately adjacent to
other P. falciparum mt RNAs except for a tendency to have an A as
the last encoded residue. Similarly, RNAs which do not directly
abut their neighbors also show no conserved characteristics except
the tendency to have a 39 terminal A. Of the 31 small RNAs for
which 39 RACE data is available, the genes for 19 end with A, 2
with C, 3 with G, and 7 with T (Table S5). The composition of the
mt genome is 32.39% A, 15.69% C, 15.90% G, and 36.01% T.
The prevalence of A residues at the 39 end of transcripts therefore
strongly exceeds that expected by chance. (This point, of course,
depends on our interpretation of which A residues are encoded
and which are added.) Overall, the mechanism for recognition of
putative cleavage sites remains unknown.
Assignment of New rRNA FragmentsPrior analyses proposed that 15 of the small P. falciparum mt
RNAs corresponded to specific regions of LSU or SSU rRNAs [4].
These assignments were based on conservation of sequence and/
or the potential to form an appropriate secondary structure while
maintaining some conserved sites. Assigning fragments which
might correspond to less conserved regions of rRNA structure is
more challenging, but can be assisted by cross-species comparisons
between related organisms. The gene content and organization is
identical in all Plasmodium species for which complete mt DNAs are
available. Indeed, the overall nt conservation is so high (Table S1;
Table S3) that comparisons between these are not particularly
used. For the P. falciparum mt rRNA fragments: red nucleotides match the 3P2O consensus sequence, light blue nucleotides differ, and blacknucleotides cannot be compared to the consensus (which is conserved at less than 90%). Base pair symbols are colored when both of the pairednucleotides have the same color. Each fragment is labeled at its 59 and 39 ends. Each helix present in P. falciparum is labeled with its helix number ingreen (e.g., H500), based on the CRW Site’s helix numbering system [URL: 16S rRNA, http://www.rna.ccbb.utexas.edu/CAR/1A/Structures/h.16.b.E.coli.hlxnum.pdf]. Inset: C. elegans mt SSU rRNA secondary structure model.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038320.g002
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 8 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
useful in assigning the small RNAs to positions in the SSU and
LSU rRNAs. However, the mt genome of T. parva was useful for
comparison.
The T. parva mt genome is, at ,6.6 kb, quite small and encodes
the same three protein coding genes as the Plasmodium mt genomes,
but they are aranged in a different order on a linear molecule,
flanked with inverted repeats [23,70]. The genome also encodes
small RNAs which have similarity to rRNA sequences, some of
which have been previously described [23]. Thus, although the
genome organization is quite different from that of Plasmodium
species, gene content is very similar. We undertook a detailed
examination of the T. parva mt genome for sequences correspond-
ing to the small RNAs mapped to the P. falciparum mt genome. T.
parva matches were found for 24 of the 27 P. falciparum small mt
rRNAs and for 2 of the unassigned RNAs (Table 1). Four of the
five previously predicted T. parva LSU rRNAs [23] match well
with our P. falciparum mapping data and predictions. The fifth, T.
parva LSU5 RNA, has only a partial overlap with its P. falciparum
counterpart, RNA3, as discussed below. With data from two
genera, it was possible to identify compensatory changes in
sequence which assisted assignment of additional P. falciparum
RNAs to specific regions of rRNA. The T. parva analysis also
assisted the identification of corresponding sequences in other
apicomplexans (Table S7). The predicted secondary structures for
fragments comprising the P. falciparum SSU and LSU rRNAs are
shown in Figures 2, 3, 4; the corresponding predicted secondary
structures for T. parva are shown in Figures S6, S7, S8.
Conservation at each position is assessed by comparison to all
available rRNA sequences from three phylogenetic domains
(Archaea, Bacteria, nuclear-encoded Eucarya) and two organelles
(mitochondria and chloroplasts), called 3P2O (three phylogenetic
domains, 2 organelles).
The P. falciparum and T. parva mt rRNA secondary structure
models are very similar to one another and to the central core of
the Escherichia coli rRNAs with one notable exception. E. coli 23S
rRNA positions 1906–1934 are contained within one of the most
highly conserved regions of LSU rRNA [55] (http://www.rna.
ccbb.utexas.edu/) and, as expected, this region (near the 5’ end of
LSUE) is conserved in the P. falciparum sequence/structure.
Surprisingly, the same region of the T. parva homologue is much
shorter, showing poor conservation [23]. This cannot be explained
as a sequencing error because the corresponding mt DNA
sequences from Babesia and Theileria species (Table S1) are also
truncated in this region.
Additional evidence to support the placement of RNA
fragments to the SSU and LSU rRNAs comes from analysis of
covariation, evaluating whether the two positions that form a
base pair have similar patterns of variation to maintain this base
pair. [71] Three categories of covariation are used to gauge the
amount of support for the placement of the RNA fragments.
Category 1 base pairs contain only pure covariations, i.e., the
patterns of variation in the two columns in the alignment are
identical; all of the base pair types (e.g., A:U, G:C, U:A, C:G)
covary with the other base pair types. Category 2 base pairs have
covariation between the two paired nucleotides, but they also
have a low frequency of the two paired positions with different
patterns of variation (e.g., base pair types A:U, G:C, with G:U
less frequent, or A:U, G:C, with A:A less frequent). Category 3
contains those positions that are either invariant or the patterns
of variation at the two paired positions are not the same (e.g.,
G:C ,-. G:U). We analyzed the base pair types present for the
mt rRNA fragments from 218 apicomplexans (species of
Plasmodium and other hemosporidians, the coccidian Eimeria,
and the piroplasms Babesia and Theileria). In total, 27 of the 34(39)
transcripts for hemosporidians, 20 predicted RNAs for the
coccidian, and 24 predicted RNAs for the piroplasms were
assigned to rRNA. The fragments that were compared are
indicated in Table S7; the category 1 and 2 base pair types are
given in Table S8 and shown in Figures S9, S10, S11).
RNA14 is the best candidate among the small RNAs for the 59
end of the SSU rRNA, being the only fragment which can form an
appropriate helix (H27) with SSUA (Figure 2). The T. parva
sequence predicted to correspond to RNA14 has little sequence
similarity to it but has capacity to pair with the T. parva SSUA-
equivalent and can form a similar predicted structure. The base-
pairing potential for the T. parva sequence is better than that
proposed for P. falciparum, thus providing more confidence in our
assignment of RNA14 as the 5’ end of SSU rRNA. Of the 17 base
pairs in the RNA14 fragment, three are category 1 and four are
category 2 (Figure S9; Table S8). RNA8 was previously proposed
to correspond to the 59 terminal domain of SSU rRNA (prior to
the identification of the RNA14 transcript) [4]; we now show that
RNA8 contains the highly conserved 790 loop and interacts with
both the 39 end of SSUA and the 59 end of SSUB (Figure 2). It has
five category 2 base pairs.
Assignment of RNA17 to SSU rRNA was based upon the facts
that RNA17 and the T. parva homologue both contain a sequence
that is very similar to E. coli SSU rRNA positions 282–294 and
that they contain H289 (Figure 2). RNA12 has the potential to
interact with RNA17, providing the remainder of H240 and a
truncated H122 (Figure 2). We have paired the central region of
RNA19 with RNA9 to form the lower half of H1047. RNA17 has
one category 2 covariation; RNA12 and RNA19 have no
covariation. The 39 portion of RNA5 has the potential to basepair
with SSUD and together they may comprise H1303. The 59
portion of RNA5 has the capacity to form an extended helix and
large loop; sequences in the proposed helical regions are well-
conserved among Plasmodium species but the 22 nt loop region
varies in both size and sequence (Table S3). Note that since we
have not yet found T. parva homologues for RNA5, RNA12, or
RNA19, assignment of these transcripts to SSU rRNA should be
considered tentative.
RNA2 and RNA11 correspond to portions of the 59 half of LSU
rRNA (Figure 3). RNA2 approximately spans E. coli LSU positions
944 through 1010, encompassing helices H946, H976 and the 59
strand of H991. RNA11 pairs with RNA2, providing the 39 strand
of H991. It also forms helix H1164 and pairs with LSUA in H812.
RNA2 consists of two hairpins with loop sequences that are very
similar to their E. coli counterparts. The T. parva homologue was
detected because the single-stranded loop sequences are identical
to those of P. falciparum. Assignment of RNA11 was accomplished
by searching the mt genomes for the conserved sequence GGUA
between H1164 and H812, followed by a sequence that could pair
with the appropriate region of LSUA. Candidate sequences were
then manually screened for the presence of a hairpin immediately
upstream of the GGUA and for the potential to interact with
RNA2. Here again the base-pairing potential for these two RNAs
was better for the T. parva homologues than for P. falciparum,
providing confirmation of our structure predictions for the known
P. falciparum transcripts. RNA1 was previously assigned [4] but we
have revised its interactions. The 59 end of RNA1 basepairs with
the 39 end of RNA11, forming H1196. RNA1 also forms H579
with the 59 end of LSUA, encompasses H1276, and basepairs with
RNA3. It was not possible to predict a structure for the 39 end of
RNA1 or the 59 end of RNA3. Of the 34 inter and intra base pairs
in RNA2, RNA11, and RNA1, six are category 1, and six are
category 2 (Figure S10; Table S8).
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 9 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
Figure 3. LSU rRNA secondary structure (59 half.) The P. falciparum mt LSU rRNA (59 half) secondary structure model is superimposed onto theE. coli LSU rRNA (59 half) secondary structure model diagram. Regions where P. falciparum has no structure equivalent to E. coli are shown using gray
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 10 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
Part of the 59 half of RNA3 forms a helix with the 39 half of
RNA1 to form H1295 (Figure 3). RNA3 also bridges the 59 half to
the 39 half of the LSU rRNA (Figures 3, 4). Part of the 39 half of
RNA3 forms the 59 strand of the H1648 helix, while the middle
section of LSUE forms the 39 half of this helix (Figure 4). RNA3 is
highly conserved among the Plasmodium species, varying in only 3–
5 sites, and the helical region is 100% conserved for both RNA3
and LSUE. The corresponding T. parva sequence (Table 1)
partially overlaps the previously predicted LSU5 rRNA of Kairo
et al. [23] and provides compensating base change evidence in
support of the proposed interactions. While no covariations exist in
the seven basepairs in H1295 (RNA3/RNA1), two category 1 and
three category 2 basepairs occur in the 15 basepairs in H1648
(Figures S10, S11; Table S8).
RNA13 is also assigned to the 39 half of LSU rRNA and
corresponds to the previously proposed LSU2 RNA in T. parva
[23]. This is a short but highly conserved sequence with only one
difference among the Plasmodium species, at the 39 end. The
fragment corresponds to E. coli sequences from ,2236–2264. The
59 end forms a shortened helix H2077 with the 39 end of LSUE
and also encompasses helix H2246 (Figure 4). The sequence of
H2246 is identical among the Plasmodium species, including
departure from the consensus sequence at three of six highly
conserved positions in and adjacent to the loop. One category 2
base pair occurs in the H2077 helix, and no covariations exist in
H2246 (Figure S11; Table S8).
Pairwise comparisons between the P. falciparum and T. parva mt
genomes and the E. coli rrnB operon also identified another short
conserved sequence (positions 4964–4981 in P. falciparum, 1518-
1501 in T. parva) that resembles E. coli 23S rRNA positions 2687-
2710, comprising a portion of H2675 (Figure 4). This 27 nt region
is identical in all 200 Plasmodium species except for one position
each for P. juxtanucleare and P. fragile. RNA18 has been mapped to
this region by 59 and 39 RACE. No covariations occur from that
portion of RNA18 that forms a five base pair helix (Figure S11;
Table S8).
RNA6 is virtually identical in Plasmodium species (Table S3). The
59 portion of RNA6 is assigned to part of the 39 strand of H2675,
basepairing with RNA18 and RNA10 (Figure 4). Of the 20
basepairs in RNA6 that interact with RNA18, RNA10, and itself,
three are category 2 covariations (Figure S11; Table S8).
We were unable to assign all of the RNA transcripts to specific
regions of the SSU and LSU rRNAs. The 34 transcripts identified
here in P. falciparum (and previous analysis by Feagin and
colleagues [3,4,27,28,62]), plus the five additional transcripts
determined by Raabe et al. [29] are listed in Table 1. In total, for
P. falciparum, 27 of the 34(39) transcripts have been assigned to
specific regions of the rRNAs. The other hemosporidians have
such well-conserved mt genomes relative to P. falciparum that we
predict they will have corresponding RNAs. Twenty-six RNAs
have been predicted for T. parva (Table 1) and similar RNAs are
predicted to exist for the other piroplasms. Similarly, 20 regions
corresponding to RNA fragments have been identified in the mt
genome of the coccidian, Eimeria (Table S7).
Composition of the P. falciparum mt SSU rRNAThe rRNA secondary structures are typically compared to those
of E. coli, as those are the most studied examples. Significant
portions of the SSU and LSU rRNAs primary, secondary, and
three-dimensional structural elements are conserved in all known
rRNAs. The conservation secondary structure diagrams available
at the Gutell lab’s Comparative RNA Web (CRW) Site [http://
www.rna.ccbb.utexas.edu/SAE/2B/ConsStruc/] reveal that the
mt rRNAs are, as a group, much more variable than the rRNAs
within the Archaea, Bacteria, nuclear-encoded Eucarya, and
chloroplasts. The mt SSU and LSU rRNAs usually have fewer
nucleotides than bacterial rRNAs (Table 2). The mt rRNAs of C.
elegans are contiguous and highly minimized [36,55], with its SSU
rRNA and LSU rRNAs being just slightly smaller than the
aggregate size of the P. falciparum mt rRNAs. The correspondence
of the P. falciparum and C. elegans mt rRNAs to each other, and to E.
coli rRNAs, is indicated in Table S9.
Twelve RNA fragments have similarity to regions of SSU rRNA
(Table 1, Figure 2). The assignments differ slightly from what we
previously proposed [4], reflecting the refinement possible with
mapped as opposed to predicted RNA ends, as well as addition of
new transcripts identified in this study. RNA8 better matches the
790 loop than did RNA4, which is now unassigned and RNA5
rather than RNA9 is assigned to the 59 strand of H1303. Together,
the twelve fragments assigned to SSU rRNA total 804 nt.
The P. falciparum mt rRNAs and the C. elegans mt rRNAs are
truncated in all of the major structural domains in the SSU and
LSU rRNAs. P. falciparum SSU rRNA contains helices (H27, H39),
the 530 loop region (helices H500, H505, H511), and H122,
H240, and H289 in domain I (Figure 2; Table S9), though much
of domain I is missing. The C. elegans mt SSU rRNA also lacks a
large portion of domain I. It shares with P. falciparum the well-
conserved helices in H27, H39, H500, H505 and H511. It lacks
H122, H240, and H289 but, unlike P. falciparum, the C. elegans mt
SSU rRNA has helices H9 and H17. The apex of the 530 loop
forms a pseudoknot helix with a few nucleotides in the bulge loop
between helices H500 and H511 [72,73], but the pseudoknot in
both P. falciparum and C. elegans lack strong basepairing potential.
This is common among mt rRNAs, however [55]. The 530 loop is
one of the most conserved regions of rRNA in both sequence and
higher order structure. It is well conserved in the mt rRNA of
Plasmodium, and closely related species of other hemosporidians,
coccidians, and piroplasms.
P. falciparum and C. elegans SSU rRNAs both include helices
H567, H577, H769, and H885 in domain II of the SSU rRNA
(Figure 2; Table S9). While P. falciparum has H821, C. elegans does
not, and C. elegans has part of H673 and H722 while P. falciparum
apparently does not have these helices. The 790 loop, the cap of
the helix H769, is highly conserved in all known rRNAs, including
P. falciparum.
Domain III is the most well-represented part of the P. falciparum
mt SSU rRNA, and there is good correspondence between P.
falciparum and C. elegans (Figure 2; Table S9). This domain contains
helices H921, H939, H944, H960, H984, H1047 (only part of it is
present in P. falciparum), H1303 (with a putative extra helix in
circles and lines. Colored nucleotides compare the P. falciparum sequence to the Three Phylogenetic Domains/Two Organelles (aka 3P2O) consensussequence from the Gutell lab’s Comparative RNA Web (CRW) Site [URL for CRW Site: http://www.rna.ccbb.utexas.edu/. URL for 23S rRNA (59 half)conservation diagram: http://www.rna.ccbb.utexas.edu/SAE/2B/ConsStruc/Diagrams/cons.23.3.3DOM.5.pdf]. Upper case colored nucleotides areconserved in at least 98% of the sequences used. For the P. falciparum mt rRNA fragments: red nucleotides match the 3P2O consensus sequence,light blue nucleotides differ, and black nucleotides cannot be compared to the consensus (which is conserved at less than 90%). Base pair symbolsare colored when both of the paired nucleotides have the same color. Each fragment is labeled at its 59 and 39 ends. Each helix present in P.falciparum is labeled with its helix number in green (e.g., H500), based on the CRW Site’s helix numbering system [URL: 23S rRNA 59 half, http://www.rna.ccbb.utexas.edu/CAR/1A/Structures/h.235.b.E.coli.hlxnum.pdf]. Inset: C. elegans mt LSU rRNA (59 half) secondary structure model.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038320.g003
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 11 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
Figure 4. LSU rRNA secondary structure (39 half.) The P. falciparum mt LSU rRNA (39 half) secondary structure model is superimposed onto theE. coli LSU rRNA (39 half) secondary structure model diagram. Regions where P. falciparum has no structure equivalent to E. coli are shown using graycircles and lines. Colored nucleotides compare the P. falciparum sequence to the Three Phylogenetic Domains/Two Organelles (aka 3P2O) consensussequence from the Gutell lab’s Comparative RNA Web (CRW) Site [URL for CRW Site: http://www.rna.ccbb.utexas.edu/. URL for 23S rRNA (39 half)conservation diagram: http://www.rna.ccbb.utexas.edu/SAE/2B/ConsStruc/Diagrams/cons.23.3.3DOM.3.pdf]. Upper case colored nucleotides areconserved in at least 98% of the sequences used. For the P. falciparum mt rRNA fragments: red nucleotides match the 3P2O consensus sequence,light blue nucleotides differ, and black nucleotides cannot be compared to the consensus (which is conserved at less than 90%). Base pair symbolsare colored when both of the paired nucleotides have the same color. Each fragment is labeled at its 59 and 39 ends. Each helix present in P.falciparum is labeled with its helix number in green (e.g., H500), based on the CRW Site’s helix numbering system [URL: 23S rRNA 39 half, http://www.rna.ccbb.utexas.edu/CAR/1A/Structures/h.233.b.E.coli.hlxnum.pdf]. Inset: C. elegans mt LSU rRNA (39 half) secondary structure model.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038320.g004
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 12 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
P. falciparum), H1350, H1399 (truncated in both P. falciparum and
C. elegans), and H1506.
Despite roughly similar sizes, the C. elegans mt SSU rRNA
includes portions of domains I and II that are not represented in
the P. falciparum mt SSU rRNA model. Two of these helices, H9
and H17, are present in all known SSU rRNAs. This suggests that
some of the unassigned small RNAs may correspond to those
regions. However, while the Plasmodium RNA sequences are highly
conserved relative to each other, there is insufficient conservation
to the specific regions of the SSU rRNA to assign the remaining P.
falciparum RNAs with confidence.
Composition of the P. falciparum mt LSU rRNASeven LSU rRNA fragments, LSUA-LSUG, were originally
predicted based on sequence similarities to other rRNAs [3].
Later, two additional LSU rRNA fragments were identified,
RNA1 and RNA10. [4] In this paper, we report identification of
transcripts for LSUB and LSUC, and assignment of RNA2,
RNA3, RNA6, RNA11, RNA13, and RNA18 to LSU rRNA. All
of these fragments have corresponding sequences in the T. parva mt
genome (Table 1). The P. falciparum mt LSU rRNA currently has
15 small RNAs assigned, ranging from 23 to 190 nt long.
Together, they total 1233 nt.
The 59 half of the LSU rRNA secondary structure is
significantly reduced in both P. falciparum and C. elegans relative
to E. coli (Figure 3; Table S9). Domain I is missing from both.
Helix H563 is between domains I and II in the LSU rRNA and is
present in C. elegans. Domain III is truncated and unmodelled in C.
elegans while P. falciparum has the domain III helix H1295, and
H1276, a helix between domains II and III.
LSUA, LSUB, LSUC, RNA2, and RNA11 are all assigned to
domain II of LSU rRNA, as is part of RNA1. As noted above,
LSUB and LSUC are assigned to the GTPase center, forming
helices H1057, H1087, and H1082 respectively. While nearly all
of the sequence deletions relative to the E. coli rRNAs occur at the
peripheral ends of an existing structural domain, two deletions,
both in the LSU rRNA, occur internally. One example of this type
of deletion occurs in the helix that links the H991 helix to the
GTPase center (Figure 3). Helices H1011 and H1030 are
significantly truncated in animal mt genomes [55]. For the C.
elegans mt LSU rRNA, a few base pairs are predicted for H1030 at
the top of the stem, with unpaired nucleotides bridging the gap
between the GTPase center and the multi-stem loop below H991.
In P. falciparum, RNA2 and RNA11 basepair to form the basal
helix in the stem (H991) but there is no interaction (i.e., noticeable
basepairing potential) between these RNAs and the GTPase center
RNAs, LSUB and LSUC. Indeed, while each of the latter can
form an intramolecular helix and can potentially interact with
each other by forming an extended helix H1082 (not present in C.
elegans), they are so small that there is no obvious capacity for them
to interact with any of the other small RNAs. We hypothesize that
the GTPase center RNAs are maintained in proper position by
interactions with ribosomal proteins. RNA2 is also assigned to
H946 and H976, neither of which is included in the C. elegans
structure. RNA11 is also assigned to H1164 and provides the 39
half of the H812 helix while the 59 half of H812 is derived from
LSUA. H1196 is shortened in P. falciparum. In contrast, C. elegans
lacks H1164 and H1196 is also truncated. RNA1 is assigned at the
junction of domains II and III, having a strongly conserved AGUA
sandwiched between dinucleotides that conserve long-distance
basepairing to domain IV.
The 39 half of the LSU rRNA secondary structure is the most
fully represented region, compared to E. coli, for both C. elegans and
P. falciparum (Figure 4; Table S9). Parts of Domain IV interact with
tRNA and the 30S ribosomal subunit. LSUD and LSUE provide
most of domain IV, with RNA3 assigned to one side of helix
H1648, the other side being provided by LSUE. There is no C.
elegans sequence corresponding to RNA3. A set of adjacent helices
(H1682, H1707, and H1752) are missing from both species and
helix H1835 is reduced in C. elegans and P. falciparum to a third the
size in E. coli. Helix 1792 is similar in size in E. coli and P. falciparum
but reduced by half in C. elegans. Other features of domain IV are
maintained in structure and sequence conservation. LSUD and
LSUE are separate RNAs in P. falciparum despite the fact that they
directly abut each other in the P. falciparum mt genome. These two
sequences have been found on the same transcript in T. parva
(RNA1 of Kairo et al. [23]), but it is possible that this represents a
precursor of LSUD and LSUE. Such a precursor RNA containing
LSUD and LSUE is detected in P. falciparum by RNase protection
(Mericle and Feagin, unpublished results) and by RT-PCR [62].
Structural features of domain V are also strongly conserved
between P. falciparum and C. elegans, which show similar variance
from E. coli (Figure 4). Both are missing the L1 binding domain
(H2112, H2113, H2117, H2120, and H2127) and the underlying
H2093 and H2200 helices. The 5S rRNA binding domain (helices
H2283–H2372) is deleted in both C. elegans and P. falciparum. The
bulk of domain V, including the peptidyltransferase center, is
intact and well-conserved, comprised of LSUE, LSUF, and
LSUG.
The most conserved feature of domain VI is the sarcin ricin
loop at the tip of the H2646 helix. This hairpin loop is conserved
across all 3P2O LSU rRNA genes, including the P. falciparum mt
RNA10 fragment (Figure 4). The initial 13 nt of RNA10 are
identical among Plasmodium species and hemosporidians but have
not been assigned to a structure. The next 38 nt are variable
across Plasmodium species and include alignment gaps but within
the more closely related subgroups, conservation is strong (Figure
S1). Regardless of the variation, this sequence can form a long
helix (Figure 4; 17 basepairs with an AAUU tetraloop in P.
falciparum). There is no corresponding structure in C. elegans or E.
coli but one has been proposed in the mt rRNA of the
dinoflagellate Karlodinium micrum [74]. If a similar hairpin exists
in T. parva RNA10, it is much shorter and significantly less stable.
The 39 end of RNA10 and the 59 end of RNA18 comprise the 59
strand of H2675. The 39 end of RNA18 continues to begin the 39
strand of H2675, and the rest of this strand is present in the 59 end
of RNA6 which continues to form H2735. Domain VI is also
truncated in C. elegans, with strong correspondence in the regions
that are present and absent in P. falciparum.
Table 2. Relative sizes of mt rRNAs.
Organism SSUa LSUa total Accession
Caenorhabditis elegans mt 697 953 1650 NC_001328.1
Leishmania tarentolae mt 610 1173 1783 NC_000894.1
Plasmodium falciparum mtb 804 1233 2037 M76611.1
Homo sapiens mt 954 1559 2513 NC_012920.1
Polytomella mtb 979 1556 2535 NC_010357.1
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mtb 1200 2419 3619 NC_001638.1
Reclinomonas americana mt 1595 2751 4346 NC_001823.1
Escherichia coli 1541 2904 4445 NC_000913.2
asizes are cited in nt.brRNAs are fragmented.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038320.t002
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 13 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
As with the SSU rRNA, it is tempting to speculate that the
regions in C. elegans mt LSU rRNA that are missing from the
assigned RNAs for the P. falciparum mt LSU rRNA are among the
unassigned RNAs.
As noted above, our confidence in the placement of the RNA
fragments onto the SSU and LSU rRNA secondary structures is
augmented with covariations between the two nucleotides that
form basepairs. Covariation analysis facilitates the identification of
the base pairs in an RNA secondary structure that are similar
among the sequences in the alignment dataset. When the
alignments juxtapose similar structural units in each column,
and they are properly interpreted with covariation analysis, the
predicted structure is nearly 100% accurate [75]. Two different P.
falciparum datasets were analyzed for positional covariations. The
first compares the RNAs with conservation of the 3P2O dataset.
Nucleotides that are conserved in 90–98% of the 3P2O dataset in
Figures 2, 3, 4 are shown as a lower case red or blue letter, and
those nucleotides conserved in 98–100% of the same 3P2O dataset
are shown as an upper case red or blue letter. Red indicates that
the P. falciparum sequence is the same as the conserved 3P2O
sequence while blue indicates that it is different. Seven base pairs
in the SSU and LSU rRNAs secondary structure diagrams have
both nucleotides colored blue indicating that the P. falciparum
sequence has covariation at some of the most conserved
nucleotides in the rRNA (Figures 2, 3, 4).
The second dataset contains the predicted mt rRNAs of 218
species of Plasmodium species and related apicomplexans. These
covariations are shown on the SSU and LSU secondary structure
diagrams (Figures S9, S10, S11; Table S8). The total number of
base pairs that have a covariation between the two paired
nucleotides are: SSU rRNA, 10 category 1 and 21 category 2;
LSU rRNA, 42 category 1 and 39 category 2; total rRNA, 52
category 1 and 60 category 2. While several helices do not have
any covariations, the majority of the helices contain at least one.
Thus, we are very confident that the majority, if not all, of the P.
falciparum fragments, have been accurately mapped to the rRNA
secondary structure. An analysis of a more diverse collection of
apicomplexan mt genomes and their RNA transcripts would
further evaluate the accuracy of fragment mapping to the rRNAs
in this manuscript, and likely facilitate the placement of a few more
fragments.
Predicted Structure of the P. falciparum mt RibosomeIn recent years, the crystal structures of large and small
ribosomal subunits and of whole ribosomes have been obtained
from several sources, greatly refining our understanding of
ribosome function during protein synthesis. Of particular interest
to the work reported here is structural data from the C. elegans mt
ribosome [36,55]. Like P. falciparum, C. elegans has highly
minimized rRNAs and as discussed above, the P. falciparum mt
rRNA fragments correspond closely to the C. elegans mt rRNAs. Mt
ribosomes have a larger protein to RNA ratio but the polypeptide
exit tunnel is still lined entirely with RNA [34]. While nothing is
specifically known about the protein content of P. falciparum mt
ribosomes, all of the RNA sequences that comprise the lining of
the C. elegans mt ribosome polypeptide exit tunnel are represented
in the RNAs that have been mapped to the 39 portion of P.
falciparum mt LSU rRNA.
The high-resolution three-dimensional crystal structures of the
30S [31] and 50S [30] ribosomal subunits revealed that the
comparative secondary structure models for the SSU and LSU
rRNA were 97–98% accurate [75]. These crystal structures also
revealed the detailed three-dimensional folding of the secondary
structure. We wanted to determine if the fragments of P. falciparum
rRNA are close together in three-dimensional space and if they
were at the known functional sites of the ribosome in protein
synthesis. All of the fragments that have been assigned to the SSU
and LSU rRNA secondary structure (Figures 2, 3, 4) were mapped
onto the three-dimensional structure of the ribosome (Figure 5A–
E; full-page versions in Figures S12, S13, S14, S15, S16). These
figures reveal that indeed nearly all of the P. falciparum rRNA
fragments map to the regions of the ribosome known to be directly
involved in protein synthesis.
Discussion
The P. falciparum mt genome encodes 34 small RNAs, 27 of
which have been assigned as parts of fragmented LSU and SSU
rRNAs. Compared to other fragmented rRNAs, the number of
separate RNAs is much larger while the fragments are far smaller,
some containing only 23 nt. Are these tiny RNAs in fact part of
functional ribosomes? Considerable data now supports this
hypothesis.
Some of the Plasmodium mt rRNA fragments were first proposed
because of sequence similarities to rRNA regions [3,20,76]. A key
issue became whether the predicted rRNAs corresponded to real
transcripts. For a few, the answer was no [4], but the small RNAs
discussed here are, by definition, transcribed. The mt genome is
polycistronically transcribed [62]; larger presumed precursor
RNAs can be detected by RNase protection [62], RT-PCR
[62], and in 39 and 59 RACE analysis (this work). The small RNAs
persist in the cell while non-coding mt sequences appear to be
rapidly degraded, based on our inability to detect them other than
by RT-PCR of presumed precursor transcripts.
The small RNAs are highly conserved across species and
between genera. Comparison of the mt genomes of 26 Plasmodium
species shows strong conservation of nucleotide sequence for the
small RNAs, to the degree seen for amino acid sequences of the
three mt protein coding genes (Table S3). Mt genome size
differences between the Plasmodium species predominantly reflect
addition or deletion of sequences in non-coding regions or at
junctions between RNAs. Sequences corresponding to many of the
P. falciparum rRNA fragments can be found in mt genomes of other
apicomplexans (Table 1; Table S3); some of them have been
confirmed as transcripts for T. parva [23]. Analysis of dinoflagellate
mt sequences has provided evidence that they also have highly
fragmented mt rRNAs [74,77,78]. It has so far been impossible to
strictly define the genetic content of the dinoflagellate mt genome.
It typically exists as multiple genome molecules carrying differing
combinations of the mt genome, including different pseudogenes
for the protein coding genes cob, cox1 and cox3. These often show
terminal deletions as if the individual DNAs are subject to a high
rate of recombination. The complex nature of dinoflagellate mt
genomes means that none can be considered complete. However,
sequences corresponding to rRNAs have been reported for several
species. Those described to date correspond to some of the best-
conserved P. falciparum mt rRNA fragments, not only in the general
identity of the region but also the size and fragmentation pattern.
Dinoflagellates are close relatives to apicomplexans so these data
suggest that the alveolate that is ancestral to both groups also
possessed fragmented mt rRNAs.
Seven of the small RNAs have not been assigned to regions of
rRNA. Their characteristics are otherwise similar to the rRNA
fragments, however. They are highly conserved among Plasmodium
species, are in a similar size range, and have non-encoded oligo(A)
tails. We hypothesize that at least some, perhaps all, of them
correspond to regions that are less well-conserved among rRNAs,
especially regions present in the C. elegans mt rRNA but missing
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 14 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 15 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
from P. falciparum rRNAs. The greatest discrepancies between
P. falciparum and C. elegans lie in SSU rRNA, suggesting that a
number of the unassigned RNAs have a role there. However,
alternative scenarios cannot be ruled out, including possible non-
rRNA functions. In that regard, it is important to note that none of
the small RNAs has a size or potential secondary structure
suggestive of tRNAs.
Mt rRNAs are often small compared to bacterial rRNAs but
contain key regions important to function. When arrayed in
positions corresponding to the secondary structure of canonical
rRNAs, the P. falciparum mt rRNA fragments correspond quite well
to regions present in other small mt rRNAs. In particular,
correspondence to the very small C. elegans mt rRNAs is quite high.
All of the rRNA fragments are predicted to basepair with at least
one additional rRNA, creating interactions that should help keep
the individual RNAs properly located and oriented. Mt ribosomal
proteins likely play a key role in maintaining the relationships of
the RNAs to each other since the interactions expected between
some fragments are limited.
Arraying the rRNA fragments in a 3-D model further
substantiates the picture of a small but functional ribosome with
the rRNA fragments clustered mostly on the interface between
subunits. The critical point is that nearly all regions of the
rRNAs that are associated with protein synthesis/function are
present in the Plasmodium mt rRNAs. Despite their unconven-
tional characteristics, they appear likely to function convention-
ally once assembled into ribosomes. How that is mediated and
the role of the unassigned fragments both remain to be
determined.
Materials and Methods
ParasitesThe C10 clone of P. falciparum was grown in vitro by the
method of Trager and Jensen [79]. Parasites were harvested by
saponin lysis of infected red cells, followed by centrifugation and
washing. Harvested cells were quick-frozen in liquid nitrogen and
stored at 280uC until use.
DNA AnalysisComplete mt DNA sequences from 25 Plasmodium species and
an isolate from a mandrill, plus eight other hemosporidians (Table
S1) were aligned in the AlignX program of Vector NTi X10 using
the Clustal W function, and manually revised as needed to
conform to the mapped 59 and 39 ends of P. falciparum RNAs.
Using this alignment, the sequence conservation relative to P.
falciparum was determined in each species for each of the small
RNAs and for the intergenic regions. Intergenic regions showing
an average conservation of ,90% or better were examined on
both DNA strands for the presence of additional small RNAs by
RNA blotting.
RNA Preparation and AnalysisTotal RNA was prepared as previously described [4] by the
acid-guanidinium-phenol-chloroform method of Chomzynski and
Sacchi [80] or with Trizol (Invitrogen). RNA blots were prepared
and analyzed as previously described [4,61]. Briefly, total RNA
was electrophoresed on 12%, 16%, or 20% acrylamide, 7 M
urea gels in TBE (0.1 M Tris-borate, 0.9 mM EDTA, pH 8.3)
and electrophoretically transferred to nylon membrane in TAE
(40 mM Tris-acetate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.2). Probes for the
RNA blots were [32P]-labeled in vitro transcripts complementary
to the gene or [32P]-end-labeled oligonucleotides, with hybrid-
ization and wash conditions as previously described for similar
probes [4]. Primer extension experiments were performed as
previously described [81], using unlabeled oligonucleotide
primers (Table S4) and Superscript reverse transcriptase (Invitro-
gen) in the presence of [a-32P] dATP. 39 RACE was employed to
determine the 39 end of the transcripts. Total RNA was treated
with DNase I (Pharmacia/Amersham) in the presence of RNasin
(Promega), followed by the addition of a 39 C tail with poly(A)
polymerase (Invitrogen), as previously described [28]. First strand
cDNA was prepared using an oligo(dG) primer
(CGGGATCCGGGGGGGGGGGG) and Superscript reverse
transcriptase. It was then PCR amplified using Pfx Platinum
polymerase (Invitrogen), with the oligo(dG) primer and a gene-
specific 59 primer (Table S4) for each rRNA fragment. PCR
conditions were 2 min at 95uC, followed by 4 repetitions of 30
seconds at primer-specific annealing temperature, one min at
72uC, 15 sec at 95uC, then 29 repetitions of the same with the
annealing temperature raised to 58uC, and finally 10 min at
72uC. For 59 RACE, first strand cDNA was prepared with gene-
specific primers, a C tail was added to the cDNA using terminal
deoxynucleotidyl transferase, and PCR was carried out using a
nested gene-specific primer and the oligo(dG) primer. For some
RNAs, the size or sequence of the transcripts precluded making a
nested primer so the cDNA primer was used for PCR as well,
with mixed success. The PCR products were cloned into the
pGEM T-EZ vector (Promega) and sequenced using an Applied
Biosystems 3730XL Genetic Analyzer.
Assignment of P. falciparum mt Transcripts to Regions ofrRNA Secondary Structure Models
The P. falciparum and T. parva mt genome sequences were re-
analyzed by performing pairwise BLAST comparisons [82]
between these two sequences and between each of these and
the E. coli rrnB operon [83]. Mt rRNA homologs detected in this
way were then manually folded to fit the E. coli secondary
structure models (http://www.rna.ccbb.utexas.edu/) [55], taking
the P. falciparum transcript mapping data into consideration. The
Spin program of the Staden package [84] was then used to assign
transcripts to "missing" regions of the secondary structures; we
searched for short stretches of sequence that are known to be
conserved among other rRNAs (see structure conservation
diagrams at the CRW Site). In some searches, we also included
query sequences that were predicted by the base pairing partner
sequence contained within other rRNA fragments that were
already assigned to the secondary structure models.
Figure 5. rRNA tertiary structure. The P. falciparum mt rRNAs are superimposed on a space-filling model of the three dimensional rRNA structure.Each individual P. falciparum rRNA fragment is colored and labeled; regions of the model with no P. falciparum equivalent are colored gray.Functional regions of the rRNAs are labeled in black. Full-page versions of each panel are available as Figures S12–S16. (A) P. falciparum SSU rRNAsuperimposed on Thermus thermophilus (PDB ID 1J5E; left = front/interface side, right = back); (B) P. falciparum LSU rRNA superimposed onHaloarcula marismortui (PDB ID 1S72; left = crown/interface side, right = back); (C–E) secondary structure diagrams for SSU, 59 LSU, and 39 LSUrRNAs, respectively, with each P. falciparum mt rRNA fragment color-coordinated with the fragment colors in the three-dimensional structure.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038320.g005
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 16 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
3D ModelThe computer program RasMol [85] and its scripting language
were used to color the regions of the SSU and LSU rRNA that are
associated with the P. falciparum rRNA fragments.
Accession NumbersAccession numbers for sequences are found in Table S1. All
are mitochondrial genome sequences from apicomplexan para-
sites.
Supporting Information
Figure S1 RNA10 variation among Plasmodium species.The sequence of P. falciparum RNA10 is shown in the top line, and
the sarcin ricin loop sequence is indicated with a horizontal
bracket. For the other Plasmodium species, positions that differ from
P. falciparum are indicated with letters. Bases shown in red are
conserved in all Plasmodium species., conserved relative to P.
falciparum; -, no corresponding nucleotide.
(TIF)
Figure S2 Identification of P. falciparum mitochondrialGTPase center rRNAs. (A) The predicted secondary
structures of the most conserved portions of the P. falciparum
mt sequence corresponding to the GTPase center are shown.
Strongly conserved nt are shown in color, with lower case
indicating 90%+ and upper case indicating 95%+ conservation
among three domains and two organelles. Red nt in the P.
falciparum sequence match the consensus and the blue nt differs
from consensus. Open circles are placeholders to indicate the
structure of a conventional GTPase center. These sequences are
identical among 26 different species of Plasmodium, with the
exception of the single position in LSUB that varies from overall
consensus. (B) Total P. falciparum RNA was electrophoresed on
denaturing 7M urea, 20% acrylamide gels, electrophoretically
transferred to nylon membrane, and probed with radiolabeled
oligonucleotides complementary to LSUB and LSUC (Table S4).
Transcript sizes were determined using a ladder of small in vitro
transcripts as markers.
(TIF)
Figure S3 Small mitochondrial RNAs of P. falciparum.Total P. falciparum RNA was electrophoresed on denaturing 7M
urea, 12% acrylamide gels, electrophoretically transferred to nylon
membrane, and probed with radiolabeled sequences (Table S4)
complementary to rDNA regions from the P. falciparum mt
genome. Transcript sizes were determined using a ladder of small
in vitro transcripts as markers. The identities of transcripts shown
on the same panel (RNA11, SSUD) were separately established
with oligonucleotide probes. Abbreviations are as shown for
Figure 1.
(TIF)
Figure S4 LSUF analysis. (A) Total P. falciparum RNA was
electrophoresed on denaturing 7M urea, 12% acrylamide gels,
electrophoretically transferred to nylon membrane, and probed
with a radiolabeled in vitro transcript complementary to LSUF.
Transcript sizes, given in nt, were determined using a ladder of
small in vitro transcripts as markers. (B) Total P. falciparum RNA
(10 ng/lane) was incubated with an unlabeled oligonucleotide
primer and Superscript reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) in the
presence of [a-32P] dATP. The products were electrophoresed on
7M urea, 12% acrylamide gels and exposed to film. Lanes 1–3,
extensions were performed at 50uC, 55uC, and 60uC, respectively.
The position of the transcript ends is indicated relative to the P.
falciparum mt genome (Genbank M76611). (C) The P. falciparum mt
sequence for nt 1501–1530 is shown. Vertical arrows indicate the
two mapped 59 ends for LSUF. Lower case letters indicate
positions that vary among 200 P. falciparum sequences. The number
of hemosporidian species exhibiting the specific nt at each position
is given.
(TIF)
Figure S5 Mapping P. falciparum mt RNAs. Schematic
representations are shown for two regions of the P. falciparum mt
genome, with mapped RNAs indicated by boxes and the DNA
sequence for transcript ends shown above the boxes. Transcript
termini are in bold, with the 59 nt italicized and the 39 nt
underlined. The nt position in the genome is located above each
terminus.
(TIF)
Figure S6 Proposed secondary structure for T. parva mtSSU rRNA. The T. parva mt SSU rRNA secondary structure
model is superimposed onto the E. coli SSU rRNA secondary
structure model diagram. The transcript ends shown are artificial,
based on the extent of sequence similarity between the mapped P.
falciparum RNAs, and the T. parva mt DNA sequence, or the
capacity to form expected secondary structure.
(TIF)
Figure S7 Proposed secondary structure for T. parva mtLSU rRNA (59 half). The T. parva mt LSU rRNA (59 half)
secondary structure model is superimposed onto the E. coli LSU
rRNA (59 half) secondary structure model diagram. The transcript
ends shown are artificial, based on the extent of sequence
similarity between the mapped P. falciparum RNAs, and the T.
parva mt DNA sequence, or the capacity to form expected
secondary structure.
(TIF)
Figure S8 Proposed secondary structure for T. parva mtLSU rRNA (39 half). The T. parva mt LSU rRNA (39 half)
secondary structure model is superimposed onto the E. coli LSU
rRNA (39 half) secondary structure model diagram. The transcript
ends shown are artificial, based on the extent of sequence
similarity between the mapped P. falciparum RNAs, and the T.
parva mt DNA sequence, or the capacity to form expected
secondary structure.
(TIF)
Figure S9 Location of type 1 and 2 covariations in SSUrRNA. The P. falciparum mt SSU rRNA secondary structure
model, shown in thick gray lines, is superimposed onto the E. coli
SSU rRNA secondary structure model diagram. Regions where P.
falciparum has no structure equivalent to E. coli are shown using
gray circles and lines. Category 1 covarying pairs are indicated
with red and category 2 with blue.
(TIF)
Figure S10 Location of type 1 and 2 covariations in LSUrRNA (59 half). The P. falciparum mt LSU rRNA (59 half)
secondary structure model, shown in thick gray lines, is
superimposed onto the E. coli LSU rRNA (59 half) secondary
structure model diagram. Regions where P. falciparum has no
structure equivalent to E. coli are shown using gray circles and
lines. Category 1 covarying pairs are indicated with red and
category 2 with blue.
(TIF)
Figure S11 Location of type 1 and 2 covariations in LSUrRNA (39 half). The P. falciparum mt LSU rRNA (39 half)
secondary structure model, shown in thick gray lines, is
superimposed onto the E. coli LSU rRNA (39 half) secondary
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 17 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
structure model diagram. Regions where P. falciparum has no
structure equivalent to E. coli are shown using gray circles and
lines. Category 1 covarying pairs are indicated with red and
category 2 with blue.
(TIF)
Figure S12 SSU rRNA tertiary structure. The P. falciparum
mt SSU rRNAs are superimposed on a space-filling model of the
three dimensional rRNA structure of Thermus thermophilus (PDB ID
1J5E; left = front/interface side, right = back). Each individual P.
falciparum rRNA fragment is colored and labeled; regions of the
model with no P. falciparum equivalent are colored gray. Functional
regions of the rRNAs are labeled in black. (Full page version of
Figure 5A.)
(TIF)
Figure S13 LSU rRNA tertiary structure. The P. falciparum
LSU rRNA is superimposed on a space-filling model of the three
dimensional rRNA structure of Haloarcula marismortui (PDB ID
1S72; left = crown/interface side, right = back). Each individual
P. falciparum rRNA fragment is colored and labeled; regions of the
model with no P. falciparum equivalent are colored gray. Functional
regions of the rRNAs are labeled in black. (Full page version of
Figure 5B.)
(TIF)
Figure S14 P. falciparum mt SSU rRNAs color-coded totertiary structure. Secondary structure diagram for P.
falciparum mt SSU rRNA with each P. falciparum mt rRNA
fragment color-coordinated with the fragment colors in the
Thermus thermophilus three-dimensional structure (Figure S12). (Full
page version of Figure 5C.)
(TIF)
Figure S15 P. falciparum mt LSU rRNAs (59 half) color-coded to tertiary structure. Secondary structure diagram for
P. falciparum mt LSU rRNA (59 half) with each P. falciparum mt
rRNA fragment color-coordinated with the fragment colors in the
Haloarcula marismortui three-dimensional structure (Figure S13).
(Full page version of Figure 5D.)
(TIF)
Figure S16 P. falciparum mt LSU rRNAs (39 half) color-coded to tertiary structure. Secondary structure diagrams for
P. falciparum mt LSU rRNA (39 half) with each P. falciparum mt
rRNA fragment color-coordinated with the fragment colors in the
Haloarcula marismortui three-dimensional structure (Figure S13).
(Full page version of Figure 5E.)
(TIF)
Table S1 Mt genomes from Plasmodium species andrelated apicomplexans.
(PDF)
Table S2 Intergenic size variation among hemospor-idian mt genomes.
(PDF)
Table S3 Similarity of individual mt genes fromPlasmodium species relative to P. falciparum.
(PDF)
Table S4 Oligonucleotides used in this study.
(PDF)
Table S5 P. falciparum mt rRNA 39 end sequences.
(PDF)
Table S6 Abutted P. falciparum mt gene sets.
(PDF)
Table S7 Fragment placement in rRNA alignments forcovariation analysis.
(PDF)
Table S8 Prospective covariations found in fragmentedapicomplexan mt rRNA genes.
(PDF)
Table S9 Correspondence of P. falciparum and C.elegans mt rRNAs.
(PDF)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Barbara Mericle, David Rehkopf, Tamara Reynolds,
Caitlin Tolzmann, and Michelle Wurscher for excellent technical
assistance.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: JEF RRG. Performed the
experiments: JEF MIH JCL KJC BHS JJC GT MNS. Analyzed the data:
JEF MIH JCL KJC BHS JJC GT MNS. Wrote the paper: JEF MNS
RRG.
References
1. Feagin JE (1992) The 6 kb element of Plasmodium falciparum encodes
mitochondrial cytochrome genes. Mol Biochem Parasitol 52: 145–148.
2. Lang BF, Gray MW, Burger G (1999) Mitochondrial genome evolution and the
origin of eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet 33: 351–397.
3. Feagin JE, Werner E, Gardner MJ, Williamson DH, Wilson RJM (1992)
Homologies between the contiguous and fragmented rRNAs of the two
Plasmodium falciparum extrachromosomal DNAs are limited to core sequences.
Nucleic Acids Res 20: 879–887.
4. Feagin JE, Mericle BL, Werner E, Morris M (1997) Identification of additional
rRNA fragments encoded by the Plasmodium falciparum 6 kb element. Nucleic
Acids Res 25: 438–446.
5. Boer P, Gray MW (1988) Scrambled ribosomal RNA gene pieces in
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mitochondrial DNA. Cell 55: 399–411.
6. Heinonen TYK, Schnare MN, Young PG, Gray MW (1987) Rearranged coding
segments, separated by a transfer RNA gene, specify the two parts of a
discontinuous large subunit ribosomal RNA in Tetrahymena pyriformis mitochon-
dria. J Biol Chem 262: 2879–2887.
7. Schnare MN, Gray MW (1990) Sixteen discrete RNA components in the
cytoplasmic ribosome of Euglena gracilis. J Mol Biol 215: 73–83.
8. Schnare MN, Heinonen TYK, Young PG, Gray MW (1986) A discontinuous
small subunit ribosomal RNA in Tetrahymena pyriformis mitochondria. J Biol
Chem 261: 5187–5193.
9. Spencer DF, Collings JC, Schnare MN, Gray MW (1987) Multiple spacer
sequences in the nuclear large subunit ribosomal RNA gene of Crithidia fasciculata.
EMBO J 6: 1063–1071.
10. Turmel M, Boulanger J, Schnare MN, Gray MW (1991) Six group I introns and
three internal transcribed spacers in the chloroplast large subunit ribosomal
RNA gene of the green alga Chlamydomonas eugametos. J Mol Biol 218: 293–311.
11. White TC, Rudenko G, Borst P (1986) Three small RNAs within the 10 kb
trypanosome rRNA transcription unit are analogous to domain VII of other
eukaryotic 28S rRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 14: 9471–9489.
12. Milbury CA, Lee JC, Cannone JJ, Gaffney PM, Gutell RR (2010)
Fragmentation of the large subunit ribosomal RNA gene in oyster mitochondrial
genomes. BMC Genomics 11: 485.
13. Evguenieva-Hackenberg E (2005) Bacterial ribosomal RNA in pieces. Mol
Microbiol 57: 318–325.
14. Okimoto R, Macfarlane JL, Clary DO, Wolstenholme DR (1992) The
mitochondrial genomes of two nematodes, Caenorhabditis elegans and Ascaris suum.
Genetics 130: 471–498.
15. Sloof P, Van den Burg J, Voogd A, Benne R, Agostinelli M, et al. (1985) Further
characterization of the extremely small mitochondrial ribosomal RNAs from
trypanosomes: a detailed comparison of the 9S and 12S RNAs from Crithidia
fasciculata and Trypanosoma brucei with rRNAs from other organisms. Nucleic
Acids Res 13: 4171–4190.
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 18 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
16. de la Cruz VF, Lake JA, Simpson AM, Simpson L (1985) A minimal ribosomal
RNA: Sequence and secondary structure of the 9S kinetoplast ribosomal RNA
from Leishmania tarentolae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 1401–1405.
17. de la Cruz VF, Simpson AM, Lake JA, Simpson L (1985) Primary sequence and
secondary structure of the 12S kinetoplast (mitochondrial) ribosomal RNA from
Leishmania tarentolae: conservation of the peptidyl transferase structural elements.
Nucleic Acids Res 13: 2337–2356.
18. Payne M, Rothwell V, Jasmer DP, Feagin JE, Stuart K (1985) Identification of
mitochondrial genes in Trypanosoma brucei and homology to cytochrome c oxidase
in two different reading frames. Mol Biochem Parasitol 15: 159–170.
19. Suplick K, Morrisey J, Vaidya AB (1990) Complex transcription from the
extrachromosomal DNA encoding mitochondrial functions of Plasmodium yoelii.
Mol Cell Biol 10: 6381–6388.
20. Vaidya AB, Akella R, Suplick K (1989) Sequences similar to genes for two
mitochondrial proteins and portions of ribosomal RNA in tandemly arrayed 6-
kilobase-pair DNA of a malarial parasite. Mol Biochem Parasitol 35: 97–108.
21. Hikosaka K, Watanabe Y, Kobayashi F, Waki S, Kita K, et al. (2011) Highly
conserved gene arrangement of the mitochondrial genomes of 23 Plasmodium
species. Parasitol Int 60: 175–180.
22. Dechering KJ, Kaan AM, Mbacham W, Wirth DF, Eling W, et al. (1998)
Isolation and functional characterization of two distinct sexual-stage-specific
promoters of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Cell Biol 19:
967–978.
23. Kairo A, Fairlamb AH, Gobright E, Nene V (1994) A 7.1 kb linear DNA
molecule of Theileria parva has scrambled rDNA sequences and open reading
frames for mitochondrially-encoded proteins. EMBO J 13: 898–905.
24. Hikosaka K, Watanabe Y, Tsuji N, Kita K, Kishine H, et al. (2010) Divergence
of the mitochondrial genome structure in the apicomplexan parasites, Babesia
and Theileria. Mol Biol Evol 27: 1107–1116.
25. Lin RQ, Qiu LL, Liu GH, Wu XY, Weng YB, et al. (2011) Characterization of
the complete mitochondrial genomes of five Eimeria species from domestic
chickens. Gene 480: 28–33.
26. Perkins SL, Austin CC (2009) Four new species of Plasmodium from New Guinea
lizards: integrating morphology and molecules. J Parasitol 95: 424–433.
27. Rehkopf DH, Gillespie DE, Harrell MI, Feagin JE (2000) Transcriptional
mapping and RNA processing of the Plasmodium falciparum mitochondrial
mRNAs. Mol Biochem Parasitol 105: 91–103.
28. Gillespie DE, Salazar NA, Rehkopf DH, Feagin JE (1999) The fragmented
mitochondrial ribosomal RNAs of Plasmodium falciparum have short A tails.
Nucleic Acids Res 27: 2416–2422.
29. Raabe CA, Sanchez CP, Randau G, Robeck T, Skryabin BV, et al. (2010) A
global view of the nonprotein-coding transcriptome in Plasmodium falciparum.
Nucleic Acids Res 38: 608–617.
30. Ban N, Nissen P, Hansen J, Moore PB, Steitz TA (2000) The complete atomic
structure of the large ribosomal subunit at 2.4 A resolution. Science 289: 905–
920.
31. Wimberly BT, Brodersen DE, Clemons WM, Morgan-Warren RJ, Carter AP, et
al. (2000) Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit. Nature 407: 327–339.
32. Schluenzen F, Tocilj A, Zarivach R, Harms J, Gluehmann M, et al. (2000)
Structure of functionally activated small ribosomal subunit at 3.3 angstroms
resolution. Cell 102: 615–623.
33. Yusupov MM, Yusupova GZ, Baucom A, Lieberman K, Earnest TN, et al.
(2001) Crystal structure of the ribosome at 5.5 A resolution. Science 292: 883–
896.
34. Mears JA, Sharma MR, Gutell RR, McCook AS, Richardson PE, et al. (2006) A
structural model for the large subunit of the mammalian mitochondrial
ribosome. J Mol Biol 358: 193–212.
35. Sharma MR, Koc EC, Datta PP, Booth TM, Spremulli LL, et al. (2003)
Structure of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome reveals an expanded
functional role for its component proteins. Cell 115: 97–108.
36. Mears JA, Cannone JJ, Stagg SM, Gutell RR, Agrawal RK, et al. (2002)
Modeling a minimal ribosome based on comparative sequence analysis. J Mol
Biol 321: 215–234.
37. Chandramouli P, Topf M, Menetret JF, Eswar N, Cannone JJ, et al. (2008)
Structure of the mammalian 80S ribosome at 8.7 A resolution. Structure 16:
535–548.
38. Ben-Shem A, Jenner L, Yusupova G, Yusupov M (2010) Crystal structure of the
eukaryotic ribosome. Science 330: 1203–1209.
39. Rabl J, Leibundgut M, Ataide SF, Haag A, Ban N (2011) Crystal structure of the
eukaryotic 40S ribosomal subunit in complex with initiation factor 1. Science
331: 730–736.
40. Hansen JL, Moore PB, Steitz TA (2003) Structures of five antibiotics bound at
the peptidyl transferase center of the large ribosomal subunit. J Mol Biol 330:
1061–1075.
41. Hansen JL, Ippolito JA, Ban N, Nissen P, Moore PB, et al. (2002) The structures
of four macrolide antibiotics bound to the large ribosomal subunit. Mol Cell 10:
117–128.
42. Tu D, Blaha G, Moore PB, Steitz TA (2005) Structures of MLSBK antibiotics
bound to mutated large ribosomal subunits provide a structural explanation for
resistance. Cell 121: 257–270.
43. Barta A, Dorner S, Polacek N, Berg JM, Lorsch JR, et al. (2001) Mechanism of
Ribosomal Peptide Bond Formation. Science 291: 203.
44. Hansen JL, Schmeing TM, Klein DJ, Ippolito JA, Ban N, et al. (2001) Progress
toward an understanding of the structure and enzymatic mechanism of the large
ribosomal subunit. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 66: 33–42.
45. Hansen JL, Schmeing TM, Moore PB, Steitz TA (2002) Structural insights into
peptide bond formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 11670–11675.
46. Ban N, Freeborn B, Nissen P, Penczek P, Grassucci RA, et al. (1998) A 9A
resolution x-ray crystallographic map of the large ribosomal subunit. Cell 93:
1105–1115.
47. Nissen P, Hansen J, Ban N, Moore PB, Steitz TA (2000) The structural basis of
ribosome activity in peptide bond synthesis. Science 289: 920–930.
48. Steitz TA (2005) On the structural basis of peptide-bond formation and
antibiotic resistance from atomic structures of the large ribosomal subunit. FEBS
Lett 579: 955–958.
49. Rodnina MV, Beringer M, Wintermeyer W (2007) How ribosomes make
peptide bonds. Trends Biochem Sci 32: 20–26.
50. Klein DJ, Moore PB, Steitz TA (2004) The contribution of metal ions to the
structural stability of the large ribosomal subunit. RNA 10: 1366–1379.
51. Klein DJ, Moore PB, Steitz TA (2004) The roles of ribosomal proteins in the
structure assembly, and evolution of the large ribosomal subunit. J Mol Biol 340:
141–177.
52. Moore PB, Steitz TA (2002) The involvement of RNA in ribosome function.
Nature 418: 229–235.
53. Nissen P, Ippolito JA, Ban N, Moore PB, Steitz TA (2001) RNA tertiary
interactions in the large ribosomal subunit: the A-minor motif. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A 98: 4899–4903.
54. Voss NR, Gerstein M, Steitz TA, Moore PB (2006) The geometry of the
ribosomal polypeptide exit tunnel. J Mol Biol 360: 893–906.
55. Cannone JJ, Subramanian S, Schnare MN, Collett JR, D’Souza LM, et al.
(2002) The comparative RNA web (CRW) site: an online database of
comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and
other RNAs. BMC Bioinformatics 3: 2.
56. Krief S, Escalante AA, Pacheco MA, Mugisha L, Andre C, et al. (2010) On the
diversity of malaria parasites in African apes and the origin of Plasmodium
falciparum from bonobos. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000765.
57. Liu W, Li Y, Learn GH, Rudicell RS, Robertson JD, Keele BF, et al. (2010)
Origin of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum in gorillas. Nature
467: 420–425.
58. Joy DA, Feng X, Mu J, Furuya T, Chotivanich K, et al. (2003) Early origin and
recent expansion of Plasmodium falciparum. Science 300: 318–321.
59. Conway DJ, Fanello C, Lloyd JM, Al Joubori BM, Baloch AH, et al. (2000)
Origin of Plasmodium falciparum malaria is traced by mitochondrial DNA. Mol
Biochem Parasitol 111: 163–171.
60. Jongwutiwes S, Putaporntip C, Iwasaki T, Ferreira MU, Kanbara H, et al.
(2005) Mitochondrial genome sequences support ancient population expansion
in Plasmodium vivax. Mol Biol Evol 22: 1733–1739.
61. Feagin JE, Drew ME (1995) Plasmodium falciparum: Alterations in organelle
transcript abundance during the erythrocytic cycle. Exp Parasitol 80: 430–440.
62. Ji Y, Mericle BL, Rehkopf DH, Anderson JD, Feagin JE (1996) The 6 kb
element of Plasmodium falciparum is polycistronically transcribed. Mol Biochem
Parasitol 81: 211–223.
63. Dubin DT, HsuChen CC, Timko KD, Azzolina TM, Prince DL, et al. (1982) 3’
termini of mammalian and insect mitochondrial rRNAs. In: Slonimski P, Borst
P, Attardi G, editors. Mitochondrial Genes. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring
Harbor Press. 89–98.
64. Dubin DT, Montoya J, Timko KD, Attardi G (1982) Sequence analysis and
precise mapping of the 3’-ends of HeLa cell mitochondrial ribosomal RNAs.
J Mol Biol 157: 1–19.
65. Van Etten RA, Bird JW, Clayton DA (1983) Identification of the 3’-ends of the
two mouse mitochondrial ribosomal RNAs. J Biol Chem 258: 10104–10110.
66. Wilson RJ, Williamson DH (1997) Extrachromosomal DNA in the Apicom-
plexa. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61: 1–16.
67. Fry M, Beesley JE (1991) Mitochondria of mammalian Plasmodium spp.
Parasitology 102: 17–26.
68. Krungkrai J (1995) Purification, characterization and localization of mitochon-
drial dihydroorotate dehydrogenase in Plasmodium falciparum, human malaria
parasite. Biochim Biophys Acta 1243: 351–360.
69. Gray MW (1993) Origin and evolution of organelle genomes. Curr Opin Genet
Dev 3: 884–890.
70. Shukla GC, Nene V (1998) Telomeric features of Theileria parva mitochondrial
DNA derived from cycle sequence data of total genomic DNA. Mol Biochem
Parasitol 95: 159–163.
71. Gutell RR, Weiser B, Woese CR, Noller HF (1985) Comparative anatomy of 16-
S-like ribosomal RNA. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 32: 155–216.
72. Powers T, Noller HF (1991) A functional pseudoknot in 16S ribosomal RNA.
EMBO J 10: 2203–2214.
73. Gutell RR, Noller HF, Woese CR (1986) Higher order structure in ribosomal
RNA. EMBO J 5: 1111–1113.
74. Jackson CJ, Norman JE, Schnare MN, Gray MW, Keeling PJ, et al. (2007)
Broad genomic and transcriptional analysis reveals a highly derived genome in
dinoflagellate mitochondria. BMC Biol 5: 41.
75. Gutell RR, Lee JC, Cannone JJ (2002) The accuracy of ribosomal RNA
comparative structure models. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12: 301–310.
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 19 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
76. Joseph JT, Aldritt SM, Unnasch T, Puijalon O, Wirth DF (1989) Character-
ization of a conserved extrachromosomal element isolated from the avian
malarial parasite Plasmodium gallinaceum. Mol Cell Biol 9: 3621–3629.
77. Kamikawa R, Inagaki Y, Sako Y (2007) Fragmentation of mitochondrial large
subunit rRNA in the dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella and the evolution of
rRNA structure in alveolate mitochondria. Protist 158: 239–245.
78. Slamovits CH, Saldarriaga JF, Larocque A, Keeling PJ (2007) The highly
reduced and fragmented mitochondrial genome of the early-branching
dinoflagellate Oxyrrhis marina shares characteristics with both apicomplexan
and dinoflagellate mitochondrial genomes. J Mol Biol 372: 356–368.
79. Trager W, Jensen JB (1978) Cultivation of malarial parasites. Nature 273: 621–
622.
80. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N (1987) Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid
guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:
156–159.
81. Gardner MJ, Feagin JE, Moore DJ, Spencer DF, Gray MW, et al. (1991)
Organization and expression of small subunit ribosomal RNA genes encoded bya 35-kb circular DNA in Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biochem Parasitol 48: 77–88.
82. Tatusova TA, Madden TL (1999) BLAST 2 Sequences, a new tool for
comparing protein and nucleotide sequences. FEMS Microbiol Lett 174: 247–250.
83. Brosius J, Dull TJ, Sleeter DD, Noller HF (1981) Gene organization and primarystructure of a ribosomal RNA operon from Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 148: 107–
127.
84. Staden R, Beal KF, Bonfield JK (2000) The Staden package, 1998. MethodsMol Biol 132: 115–130.
85. Bernstein HJ (2000) Recent changes to RasMol, recombining the variants.Trends Biochem Sci 25: 453–455.
86. Cox-Singh J, Davis TM, Lee KS, Shamsul SS, Matusop A, et al. (2008)Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in humans is widely distributed and potentially life
threatening. Clin Infec Dis 46: 165–171.
P. falciparum Mitochondrial rRNAs
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 20 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38320
P. falciparum UAUGUCCUGU UUCAAAUAUA UAUAU----GAAUA AUUGUACGAA UAGACAAUUG UGUUCAUAGC UAGAGUACGU AAGGAAAAGG AAAGGUUAAC CGCUAUCAAAP. reichenowii .......... .......... .....----..... .........U ..U....... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... P. billcollinsi .......... .......... .....AU--..... .......... ..U....... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... P. billbrayi .......... .......... .....AUAU..... .........U ..U....... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... P. gallinaceum .......... .....G...U GU.G-----CU.AU ..G.-..... CUA.U..... .......... .......... ........A. .......... .......... P. relictum .......... ...C.G...U GU.G-----CU.AU ..G.-..... .UU.U..... .......... .......... ........A. .......... .......... P. juxtanucleare .......... .....G...U –U.G-----CU.AU ..G.-..... .UAU--.... .......... .......... ........A. .......... .......... P. floridense .......... ...G.U..AU GU.G-----CU.AU ..G.-..... .UAUU..... .......... .......... ........A. .......... .......... P. mexicanum .......... ...G....AC AU.G-----CU... UAA.-..-.. .U.U...... .......... .......... ........A. .......... .......... P. ovale .......... ...G.U..U. G..C-----UU... U...-..A.U A.U.U.U... ...AA..... .......... .......... .......... .......... P. malariae .......... .....C...U G..G-----CU.AU ..G.-..-.. .UA.--U... ...AC.A... .......... .......... .......... .......... P. gonderi .......... .....U.... G.. -----CU.GU ..A.-..-.. ..A.--G... ...AA.A... .......... ........A. .......... .......... P. sp. .......... .....C...U G..G-----CU.AU ..A.-..-.. ..C.---... ...AA.A... .......... ........A. .......... .......... P. fragile .......... ....UC.... G.U.-----CU.GU ..A.-.U-.. .UU.---... ..A.A.A... .......... ........A. .......... .......... P. knowlesi .......... ...GUCC... G...-----CU.GU ..A.-..-.. .UA.--G... ...AA.A... .......... ........-. .......... .......... P. coatneyi .......... ....UCC... G.U.-----CU.GU ..A.-G.-.. .UA.--G... ...AA.A... .......... ........A. .......... .......... P. inui .......... ....GC.... G.U.-----CU.GU ..A.-..-.. .CA.--.... ...AG..... .......... ........A. .......... .......... P. hylobati .......... .....C.... G.U.-----CU.GU ..A.-..-.. .GA.--.... ....A.A... .......... ........A. .......... .......... P. vivax .......... .....C.... G...-----CU.GU ..A.-..-.. ..AU--.... ....A.A... .......... ........A. .......... .......... P. simuim .......... .....C.... G...-----CU.GU ..A.-..-.. ..AU--.... ....A.A... .......... ........A. .......... .......... P. simiovale .......... .....C.... G...-----CU.GU ..A.-..-.. .UU.--.... ...AA.A... .......... .......... .......... .......... P. fieldi .......... .....C.... G...-----CU.GU ..A.-..-.. .UU.--.... ...AA.A... .......... ........A. .......... .......... P. cynomolgi .......... .....C.... G...-----CU.GU ..A.-..-.. .UA.--.... ....A.A... .......... ........A. .......... .......... P. yoelii .......... ...G.U.... -C.G.----CU.G. U.A.-..-.. ..C.U.U... ...AU.A... .......... .......... .......... .........- P. berghei .......... ...G.U.... -C.G.----CU.G. U.A.-..-.. ..C.U.U... ...AU.A... .......... .......... .......... .........- P. chabaudi .......... ...G.U.... -C...----CU.AG U.A.-.U-.. .GC.U.U... ...AU.A... ....C..... .......... .......... .........-
sarcin ricin loop
Gg U
AC
C
c CA
AAA A
Aa
A
UuU UU
U
UU
U
U
U
Gg
GG
g
Gg
G
G U
uC cC
oo
oo
o
ooo
oo
o
oo
LSUB LSUCA
B
23
LSUC
—
LSUB
~30
H1082
H1087H1057
78
6568
4840 40
54
RNA11SSUD RNA12 RNA13 RNA14 RNA15 RNA16
1501 1510Pf G A G A T A A T G T g C C G TG 15 1 4 2 3 24 34 28 34A 3 22 8 5 3 7 3 6T 16 11 22 26 28 27 7 34 34 34C 1 34 34
1520 1530Pf A A A C A t A T A A C G G T AG 34 1 1 33 32 33A 16 34 34 34 33 34 33 1 2 34T 18 33 34 1C 34 1
LSUF (short)
LSUF (long)C
A
125110
1 2 3B
1501
1516
AATAAATAATATCTAGCG . . . . . . . .TACGCCCTTAACG . . . AAATGT . .CCCTATT
AAGCTTTTG . . . CAATATTGAGTTGAC . . . GAGTGGATTAAATGCC
RNA16 RNA20 RNA9
3 72713433B
1630 1631 1638A
SSUELSUF
1680 1763 180617641754
RNA2 RNA21
1697
RNA26t RNA3
1807 1829 1830
SSU A
SSU B
RNA 9
SSU D
SSU E
SSU F
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
RNA 8
RNA 14
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
RNA 17
GA
U
UAUAUACGUAUGCU
AAUAGAAC
C U
UU
UAU A A
UCCCA
UGCUGAUAUUA
AA U A
A UA UC A
UUA GC C
UAA U UUCUAU
AAAA
A A G G A U U GGAUAUUAUA
UUGUAAAA
U C A UGCAG
UGCC
AGCA
G CCGC G
GCAA
UAC
UGUA
UAAUUC
GAGUAUAGUAA
AUUCAUG
UU A G
GCGAA
AA
ACGAG
UUCAUGUU
AUAUAAUUAACAUAUUUGAA A
CUCUA
UA U
CUGUUU
UA U
AGUA
CAGG
AUU
A G AUA
CCCUGGAA
UA
UAUUGA U UC
CACA
UAUA A GA AC
UUUAU
AU
UUCUUUGCCU
U GGA U GUC A
GU UAG
UACGUA
ACAUACAU
GU
UGA A A U G U U AU
A A GU A GU GA A A UCAGU
GGAACAUGUUGUUUAAUUUG
AUUU
CAC
G CACUAUAU C U UAC
UGAUAA
AA
UU
AC
AC
UA
AG
UC
AG
AA
UC
AU
CUAAUU
UAUCAG
UAC
AUUAAUGUGUUAC A A
GA
GA
UGAU
GGCCGUA
GG
AAUUGA
UAUUAAACGUCAA A
GA
GUACU
AG
AC
GU
UAAAUAUUCU
AGCA G U A U
U C GC
GUAAUA
ACUACUUUGAA
CACACUGC
UCG
AC
ACGUA
UUACAGUC
AGUACGA
AGUCGA
AAC
A AGGU A GU U G AC A G U
GA
ACUUGUAGCUGAACAAAGUA
LSU A
LSU B LSU C3’5’
3’
3’ 5’
5’
5’
3’
5’
3’5’
3’
5’
RNA 2 RNA 11
RNA 1
RNA 3
3’ half
C
UUAAC
GUAAUUAA
AUAUUU
CA
GUA
AAAA
UU
GU
A
A
UCUAACUUUAUUU
AA U A C A
UU
GGUACGAACC
UUA
CA
CCC
UUAAA
C GG
UG
UU
GGA
CGA AAUAAAGUUAA
UAGA
UAAAU U C C
AAU
U G A AC
AA
UU
AU
A GA
UU
GUUCUCUGU
GA
AA
UCUUUU
AUG
AA
GAGU
AAUGA
UG
GACUAUGUAAGUUAA C C U A U G U A G U C
AAA
UG
CGA
AA
C AGC
GC A CA A
UCA UAU
UUAAAGUAC
AU UA
AUGUAUGCUUG
AAU
G C UG U A A U C A C U
UUU
AAAGA G
A UAG C G U
UA
UAGCUC
ACU
G
UAUAGAU U
UGAAAUA
AAUG A A
AA
UU
UU
UU
AA
GGUAA C A G A G
UAGAGAA CCU
UCUGGA A
UU
AUG U U A A U
UU
UA
GU
A A UG A A A A U A U C
AGUAUA
UACAGUAACUUAUUAUAG
ACCAUUUUGCAAUCAUAUUUGAAAUAUAUUUCU
AUACUG
LSU D
LSU E
LSU FLSU G
5’
3’ 5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
RNA 10
RNA 3 5’3’
RNA 13
RNA 18
RNA 65’
3’5’
3’A
3’
5’ half UGAGU
UA
A AUUUAGUG
AAGGAACUUGACAGGUAC
AA
UGAGGAGCGU
CUGUUGA
AUA
C C UA C AC
A AGAUAAUG
CUAAGAUU
U AUAUCGAUGU
AUAUUAUCU G
AU A C C
UGUUC
A GUGGUUU
AGCC A
AACAAC A
GGGA U C
UC
UU UU A
AA G
UAAGAA
UU
GACUAUCU
AAAUAAUAGUCAU
GU
GAAUGGUA
UAAC
GACUUCUCU
AUU
GUCUC
CACUAAAUG
UUCU A U G A A A U
AG
AC
UU
A GC U UU G A A
UA
GGAAGCUU
GA U A U A C U
GG G A C G G
UA
AG
A CCCUGUGC
ACCUU
CACUUCCCUCCGA
AGGGAAGU U U A
GCC
GGG A
AGUUU G
CGUCUU
UAACUA
CU
AUUG
GU
AA
UAAGGU A
CGCCAGGG A U A
AC
AGG U U AA A G A U U A A
U U AU A G U
AC
UCAUG
UAAUUAAUCU
AUUGAC
AC
CU
CC
AUGUC
GUCU
CACCAUA C C U U U U
UG
UU
UU
G
UU
AA U G C U U GA
AUAAGGUUUAA
UAGGU
AUGAGA
GUUC
UCAUAU
UAAU A
UGGUA
C GUGA
GUUGGGUUAAGAACGCC
GCAA GGC
U GUUCG
UUCCC
UAUCUAGAUAUU
UGAAAGAGUUUUGU
UU U A U A U G U A A
AA
GU
G
U
U
CUAGCCAGA G U
A CG U
AA
GGA
AUAGGAAAG
AU
UA
AC CG
CU
AUCAGG
UGUU
CG
GU
AU
UG
CA
UGC
CUAG
UG
UAU U GA U GU A A
UU
AU
CGCA
CAA
AUA
GU
UA
AC
AAGA
AAA
AUAU
AU
UA
AUAAGU
U G AA
GU
UAUGGU
UUAA
5’
3’
SSUA
RNA14
RNA12
RNA17
SSUE
SSUFSSUD RNA5
SSUB
RNA8
RNA19
RNA9
5’3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
I
II
III
10
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
950
1000
1050
1100
1150
1200
1250
1300
13501400
1450
1500
H9
H17H27
H122
H240H289
H500
H505
H511
H567
H575H577
H655
H673
H722
H769
H885
H921H939
H944
H960
H984
H1047
H1068H1074
H1303
H1350
H1399
H1506
H39
H821
H1241
5’ 3’
5’
3’
LSUB
5’
3’
LSUC
5’
3’
RNA2
5’
3’
RNA11
5’
3’
RNA1RNA3
5’
3’
LSUA
3’ half
5’
I
II
III
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
950
1000
10501100
1150
1200
1250
1300
1350
1400
1450
1500
1550
1600
1640
2900
H563
H579
H589
H671
H687
H736
H700
H777
H812
H822
H946
H976
H991
H1030
H1057
H1082
H1087
H1164H1196
H1262
H1276
H1295
5’
3’
3’
RNA3
5’
3’
LSUD5’
3’
LSUE
5’ 3’RNA13
5’
3’
LSUF
5’
3’ LSUG
5’
3’
RNA10
5’
3’ RNA185’
3’
RNA6
a
a
5’
3’
5’ half
IV
V
VI
1650
17001750
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
2050
2100
2150
2200
2250
2300
2350
2400
2450
2500
2550
2600
2650
2700
2740
2800
2850
2900
H1648
H1764
H1775H1782
H1792
H1830
H1835 H1906
H1925
H1935
H2023
H2043
H2064
H2077H2246
H2455
H2507
H2520
H2547
H2588
H2646
H2675
H2735
530 loop
A-siteP-site
SSUA
RNA14
SSUF
SSUD
RNA9SSUB
RNA8
SSUE
RNA19
RNA5
RNA12
RNA17
P-loopPTL GTPase
SRL
A-loop
LSUA
LSUG
RNA10
LSUB
RNA13 RNA11
RNA1
RNA3
RNA18
LSUD
RNA2
LSUC
LSUF
RNA6
LSUE
5’
3’
SSUA
RNA14
RNA12
RNA17
SSUE
SSUF SSUD RNA5
SSUB
RNA8
RNA19
RNA9
5’3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
5’
3’
I
II
III
10
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
950
1000
1050
1100
1150
1200
1250
1300
13501400
1450
1500
H9
H17H27
H122
H240H289
H500
H505
H511
H567
H575H577
H655
H673
H722
H769
H885
H921H939
H944
H960
H984
H1047
H1068H1074
H1303
H1350
H1399
H1506
G
5’ 3’
5’
3’
LSUB
5’
3’
LSUC
5’
3’
RNA2
5’
3’
RNA11
5’
3’
RNA1 RNA3
5’
3’
LSUA
3’ half5’
I
II
III
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
950
1000
10501100
1150
1200
1250
1300
1350
1400
1450
1500
1550
1600
1640
2900
H563
H579
H589
H671
H687
H736
H700
H777
H812
H822
H946
H976
H991
H1030
H1057
H1082
H1087
H1164H1196
H1262
H1276
H1295
5’
3’
3’
RNA3
5’
3’
LSUD5’
3’
LSUE
5’ 3’RNA13
5’
3’
LSUF
5’
3’ LSUG
5’
3’
RNA10
5’
3’ RNA185’
3’
RNA6
a
a
5’
3’
5’ half
IV
V
VI
1650
17001750
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
2050
2100
2150
2200
2250
2300
2350
2400
2450
2500
2550
2600
2650
2700
2740
2800
2850
2900
H1648
H1764
H1775H1782
H1792
H1830
H1835 H1906
H1925
H1935
H2023
H2043
H2064
H2077H2246
H2455
H2507
H2520
H2547
H2588
H2646
H2675
H2735
Table S1. Mt genomes from Plasmodium species and related
apicomplexans.
Organism1
(Host2)
Mt DNA size (nt)
3
identity to M76611
Initial Set4 Accession Data
Plasmodium (Haemosporida)
P. berghei (rodent) 5957 88.3% Y AB558173 (contig 5406, Sanger)
5961 88.0% AF014115
P. billbrayi (chimpanzee) 5945 91.8% GQ355468
5949 91.7% Y GQ355469
5864 90.3% GQ355470
5865 90.5% GQ355471
P. billcollinsi (chimpanzee) 5864 92.7% GQ355477
5864 92.8% GQ355478
5950 94.2% Y GQ355479
P. chabaudi (rodent) 5949 88.1% AB379663
5949 88.2% AB379664
5949 88.2% AB379665
5949 88.1% AB379666
5949 88.1% AB379667
5949 88.2% AB379668
5949 88.2% AB379669
5949 88.2% AB379670
5949 88.2% AB379671
5948 88.2% Y AF014116
P. coatneyi (OW monkey, Asian) 5976 88.5% Y AB354575
P. cynomolgi (OW monkey, Asian) 5983 88.8% AB434919
5982 88.8% AB444121
5985 88.8% AB444122
5986 88.9% AB444123
5983 88.8% AB444124
5983 88.8% AB444125
5993 88.9% AB444126
5986 88.9% AB444127
5986 88.9% AB444128
5991 88.8% AB444129
5984 88.8% AB444130
5984 88.8% AB444131
5884* 87.3% Y AY800108
Organism1
(Host2)
Mt DNA size (nt)
3
identity to M76611
Initial Set4 Accession Data
P. falciparum (human) 5967 (self) Y M76611
5967 99.9% AJ276844 (NC_002375)
5949 99.9% AY282924
5949 99.9% AY282925
5949 99.9% AY282926
5949 99.9% AY282927
5949 99.9% AY282928
5949 99.9% AY282929
5949 99.9% AY282930
5949 99.9% AY282931
5949 99.9% AY282932
5949 99.9% AY282933
5949 99.9% AY282934
5949 99.9% AY282935
5949 99.9% AY282936
5949 99.9% AY282937
5949 99.9% AY282938
5949 99.9% AY282939
5949 99.9% AY282940
5949 99.9% AY282941
5949 99.9% AY282942
5949 99.9% AY282943
5949 99.9% AY282944
5949 99.9% AY282945
5949 99.9% AY282946.
5949 99.9% AY282947
5949 99.9% AY282948
5949 99.9% AY282949
5949 99.9% AY282950
5949 100.0% AY282951
5949 100.0% AY282952
5949 99.9% AY282953
5949 99.9% AY282954
5949 99.9% AY282955
5949 99.9% AY282956
5949 99.9% AY282957
5949 99.9% AY282958
Organism1
(Host2)
Mt DNA size (nt)
3
identity to M76611
Initial Set4 Accession Data
5949 99.9% AY282959
5949 100.0% AY282960
5949 99.9% AY282961
5949 99.9% AY282962
5949 99.9% AY282963
5949 99.9% AY282964
5949 99.9% AY282965
5949 99.9% AY282966
5949 99.9% AY282967
5949 99.9% AY282968
5949 99.9% AY282969
5949 100.0% AY282970
5949 100.0% AY282971
5949 99.9% AY282972
5953 99.9% AY282973
5949 99.9% AY282974
5949 99.9% AY282975
5949 99.9% AY282976
5949 99.9% AY282977
5949 99.9% AY282978
5949 99.9% AY282979
5949 99.9% AY282980
5949 99.9% AY282981
5949 99.9% AY282982
5949 100.0% AY282983
5949 99.9% AY282984
5949 100.0% AY282985
5949 99.9% AY282986
5949 100.0% AY282987
5949 100.0% AY282988
5949 99.9% AY282989
5949 99.9% AY282990
5949 99.9% AY282991
5949 99.9% AY282992
5949 99.9% AY282993
5949 99.9% AY282994
5949 99.9% AY282995
Organism1
(Host2)
Mt DNA size (nt)
3
identity to M76611
Initial Set4 Accession Data
5949 99.9% AY282996
5949 99.9% AY282997
5949 99.9% AY282998
5949 99.9% AY282999
5949 99.9% AY283000
5949 99.9% AY283001
5949 99.9% AY283002
5949 99.9% AY283003
5949 99.9% AY283004
5949 99.9% AY283005
5949 99.9% AY283006
5949 99.9% AY283007
5949 99.9% AY283008
5949 99.9% AY283009
5949 99.9% AY283010
5949 99.9% AY283011
5949 99.9% AY283012
5949 100.0% AY283013
5949 100.0% AY283014
5949 100.0% AY283015
5949 99.9% AY283016
5949 99.9% AY283017
5949 100.0% AY283018
5967 99.8% DQ642845
P. fieldi (OW monkey, Asian) 5983 89.0% Y AB354574
5988 89.0% AB444132
5987 89.0% AB444133
P. floridense (lizard) 6002 88.3% Y EF079654 (NC_009961)
P. fragile (OW monkey, Asian) 5977 88.7% AB444134
5978 88.8% AB444135
5977 88.7% AB444136
5977 88.7% Y AY722799 (NC_012369)
P. gallinaceum (bird) 6003 88.3% Y AB250690 (NC_008288)
6002 88.1% AB599930
P. gonderi (OW monkey, African) 5989 89.1% AB434918
5900* 87.7% Y AY800111
P. hylobati (OW monkey, Asian) 5973 88.3% Y AB354573
Organism1
(Host2)
Mt DNA size (nt)
3
identity to M76611
Initial Set4 Accession Data
P. inui (OW monkey, Asian) 5972 88.0% AB354572
5976 88.5% AB444109
5981 88.4% AB444110
5976 88.2% AB444111
5980 88.4% AB444112
5976 88.2% AB444113
5981 88.2% AB444114
5971 88.0% AB444115
5973 87.9% AB444116
5976 88.2% AB444117
5972 87.9% AB444118
5979 88.4% AB444119
5976 88.5% AB444120
5972 87.9% Y HM032052
P. juxtanucleare (bird) 6014 87.8% Y AB250415
P. knowlesi (OW monkey, Asian;
human5)
5957 88.4% AB444106
5958 88.4% AB444107
5958 88.3% AB444108
5957 88.4% Y AY722797 (NC_007232)
P. malariae (human) 5968 88.8% Y AB354570
5969 88.7% AB489192
5969 88.7% AB489193
5968 88.7% AB489194
5856 87.0% GQ355485
5856 87.0% GQ355486
P. mexicanum (lizard) 5991 87.9% AB375765
5991 87.9% Y EF079653 (NC_009960)
P. ovale (human) 5974 89.1% Y AB354571
P. reichenowi (chimpanzee) 5966 97.4% Y AJ251941 (NC_002235)
P. relictum (bird) 5996 88.4% AY733088 (NC_012426)
6003 87.8% AY733089
5997 88.8% Y AY733090
P. simiovale (OW monkey, Asian) 5987 89.0% AB434920
5898* 87.6% Y AY800109
P. simium (NW monkey) 5990 88.9% Y AY722798 (NC_007233)
5899 87.5% AY800110
P. vinckei vinckei (rodent) 5948 87.5% AB599931
Organism1
(Host2)
Mt DNA size (nt)
3
identity to M76611
Initial Set4 Accession Data
P. sp. DAJ-2004 (OW monkey, African) 5896* 87.3% Y AY800112
P. vivax (human) 5991 88.9% AY598035
5990 88.9% AY598036
5991 88.9% AY598037
5991 88.9% AY598038
5991 88.9% AY598039
5991 88.9% AY598040
5994 88.9% AY598041
5989 88.9% AY598042
5990 88.9% AY598043
5991 88.9% AY598044
5991 88.9% AY598045
5989 88.9% AY598046
5989 88.9% AY598047
5992 88.9% AY598048
5991 88.9% AY598049
5989 88.9% AY598050
5990 88.9% Y AY598140 (NC_007243)
P. yoelii (rodent) 5956 88.4% Y M29000 M21313 M33978 (MALPY00209 (TIGR))
Other Haemosporida
H. sp. jb1.JA27 (bird) 5970 86.6% AY733086 (NC_012423)
H. sp. jb2.SEW5141 (bird) 5970 86.8% Y AY733087 (NC_012425)
H. columbae (bird) 5988 83.3% Y FJ168562 (NC_012448)
Hepatocystis sp. (bat) 6259 86.3% Y FJ168565
L. caulleryi (bird) 5959 85.9% Y AB302215
L. fringillarium (bird) 5992 83.2% Y FJ168564 (NC_012451)
L. majoris (bird) 6684 83.5% Y FJ168563 (NC_012450)
L. sabrasezi (bird) 5935 82.6% Y AB299369 (NC_009336)
Parahaemoproteus vireonis (bird) 5893* 86.6% Y FJ168561 (NC_012447)
Eimeria (Coccidia)
Eimeria tenella (bird) 6213 NA AB564272
Babesia and Theileria (Piroplasmida)
B. bovis (cow) 5970 NA AB499088
6005 NA EU075182
B. caballi (horse) 5847 NA AB499086
B. gibsoni (dog) 5865 NA AB499087
T. annulata (cow) 5905 NA CR940346 (NT_167255)
Organism1
(Host2)
Mt DNA size (nt)
3
identity to M76611
Initial Set4 Accession Data
T. equi (horse) 8246 NA AB499091
T. orientalis (cow) 5957 NA AB499090
T. parva (cow) 5924 NA AB499089
5895 NA Z23263 (011005)
1 P., Plasmodium; H., Haemoproteus; L., Leucocytozoon; B., Babesia; T., Theileria.
2 OW, Old World; NW, New World.
3 * mt genome sequence incomplete; presumed to reflect PCR primer choice.
4 Complete (or nearly complete) mitochondrial genomes of 25 Plasmodium species, one Plasmodium isolate,
and eight related hemosporidian species used for initial alignment.
5 P. knowlesi, previously considered only a monkey parasite, has recently been found to cause human
infections as well [86].
Table S2. Intergenic size variation among hemosporidian mt genomes.
Organisma RNA23t>
<LSUCb
RNA10< <cox3
c
cox3< >LSUF
LSUF> >SSUE
SSUE> >RNA2
RNA3> <SSUA
SSUA< >cox1
cox1c>
>cobc
RNA4> >RNA5
RNA5> >RNA6
RNA12> >RNA18
RNA8< >RNA16
P. falciparum 0 9 28 7 16 5 13 20 19 5 18 15
P. reichenowi 0 9 28 7 16 5 13 20 19 5 18 15
P. billcollinsi 1 9 34 7 16 5 13 20 19 5 18 15
P. billbrayi 0 9 38 7 15 5 13 20 19 4 18 14
P. gallinaceum 1 10 32 10 17 5 17 14 19 7 25 15
P. relictum 0 10 32 10 14 5 17 14 19 7 25 15
P. juxtanucleare 7 11 31 15 18 5 18 14 18 7 24 15
P. floridense 0 10 31 9 17 5 17 15 19 0 25 18
P. mexicanum 1 10 33 12 16 5 13 14 19 0 18 18
P. ovale 1 9 30 11 18 5 17 7 19 4 20 9
P. malariae 1 9 31 7 18 5 19 14 19 4 20 9
P. gonderi 0 8 30 11 18 5 28 27 19 1 19 16
P. sp. DAJ-2004 2 6 30 11 17 5 29 24 19 4 19 15
P. fragile 2 6 30 11 18 5 26 21 20 4 20 10
P. knowlesi 2 6 30 11 18 5 14 18 19 4 20 6
P. coatneyi 2 6 30 11 18 5 32 21 18 3 20 6
P. inui 2 6 30 11 17 5 17 20 29 4 20 11
P. hylobati 2 6 31 11 17 5 24 21 29 4 20 9
P. vivax 2 12 30 11 18 5 24 21 19 4 20 11
P. simium 2 12 30 11 18 5 31 21 19 4 20 11
P. simiovale 2 8 30 11 18 5 28 17 19 4 20 11
P. fieldi 2 8 32 11 18 5 25 13 19 4 20 11
P. cynomolgi 2 10 30 11 18 5 23 15 19 4 20 15
P. yoelii 1 6 30 11 16 5 17 19 19 0 22 4
P. berghei 1 6 30 11 16 5 17 19 19 0 22 4
Organisma RNA23t>
<LSUCb
RNA10< <cox3
c
cox3< >LSUF
LSUF> >SSUE
SSUE> >RNA2
RNA3> <SSUA
SSUA< >cox1
cox1c>
>cobc
RNA4> >RNA5
RNA5> >RNA6
RNA12> >RNA18
RNA8< >RNA16
P. chabaudi 1 6 30 11 15 5 17 17 19 0 21 4
Haemoproteus sp. 4 11 32 7 17 5 13 15 0 0 25 16
Parahaemoproteus 4 12 32 7 17 5 17 15 12 0 25 NA
L. caulleryi 2 4 32 4 17 5 14 16 11 0 25 13
L. sabrasezi 2 10 32 4 4 2 13 13 11 0 27 17
L. majoris 4 11 32 6 17 3 17 15 11 4 27 14
L. fringillarium 4 11 33 6 17 9 17 15 11 10 27 14
H. columbae 3 10 31 7 17 5 18 19 8 0 24 17
Hepatocystis sp. 20 19 62 16 18 18 46 94 24 0 0 28
a Organisms arranged by relatedness of mt genomes from Clustal W alignment, to assist pattern identification. P, Plasmodium; L, Leucocytozoon; H,
Haemoproteus.
b Gene pairs flanking a gap of 10 nt or more are shown with carets indicating the direction of transcription. The number of nt in the gap is given, based on
the 5’ or 3’ end of the flanking transcripts, as appropriate.
c For these genes, the gap is calculated from the end of the ORF, not the transcript end. This was done because using the transcript end would have
required negative numbers for some gaps.
SSUA S4 108 92 6% 99 1% 99 1% 92 6% 93 5% 93 5% 94 4% 94 4% 94 4% 93 5% 93 5% 94 4% 93 5% 93 5% 93 5% 93 5% 93 5% 94 4% 93 5% 100 0% 93 5% 93 5% 93 5% 93 5% 92 6% 94 3%
804 95 97 94 96 98 95 96 94 95 96 95 96 94 95 95 95 95 95 95 99 95 95 95 95 95 95average SSU rRNA
98.5% 99.5% .0% 99.5% 98.5% 98.5% 99.0% 99.0% 9% 99.0% 99.0% 98.5% 9% 99.0% 98.5% 99.0% 96.9% 99.0% .0% 98.5% 98.5% 99.0% 99.0% 98
RNA4 72 86 96 98 83 87 86 86 90 84 90 86 86 84 88 76 84 86 88 86 100 0% 90 87 84 84 1% 87
identical 376 89% 98% 99% 90% 91% 91% 91% 83% 91% 83% 91% 91% 88% 83% 91% 91% 90% 82% 91% 100% 83% 91% 91% 91% 89% 90%
Amino acid sequence similarity is shown We calculated similarity on the basis of identity and also allowing for conservative amino acid replacements
Table S3. Similarity of individual mt genes from Plasmodium species relative to P. falciparum.
gene rRNA ordera size (nt)
berg
hei
billb
rayi
billc
ollin
si
chab
audi
coat
neyi
cyno
mol
gi
field
i
florid
ense
frag
ile
galli
nace
um
gond
eri
hylo
bati
inui
juxt
anuc
lear
e
know
lesi
mal
aria
e
man
drill
b
mex
ican
um
oval
e
reic
heno
wi
relic
tum
sim
iova
le
sim
ium
viva
x
yoel
i
aver
age
RNA14 S1 39 100.0% 97.4% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 92.3% 100.0% 97.4% 97.4% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.5%RNA12 S2 59 89.8% 98.5% 100.0% 86.4% 93.2% 91.5% 93.2% 93.2% 91.5% 96.6% 96.6% 93.2% 89.8% 94.9% 89.8% 91.5% 91.5% 93.2% 93.2% 100.0% 94.9% 91.5% 89.8% 89.8% 89.8% 92.7%RNA17 S3 40 97.5% 97.6% 97.5% 97.5% 97.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.0% 98.9%SSUA S4 108 92 6%. 99 1%. 99 1%. 92 6%. 93 5%. 93 5%. 94 4%. 94 4%. 94 4%. 93 5%. 93 5%. 94 4%. 93 5%. 93 5%. 93 5%. 93 5%. 93 5%. 94 4%. 93 5%. 100 0%. 93 5%. 93 5%. 93 5%. 93 5%. 92 6%. 94 3%.RNA8 S5 100 94.0% 99.1% 99.0% 95.0% 96.0% 95.0% 96.0% 91.0% 95.0% 94.0% 97.0% 96.0% 95.0% 94.0% 95.0% 96.0% 96.0% 95.0% 95.0% 99.0% 93.0% 94.0% 95.0% 95.0% 93.0% 95.3%SSUB S6 116 97.4% 99.2% 99.1% 97.4% 99.1% 97.4% 99.1% 96.6% 96.6% 97.4% 97.4% 99.1% 97.4% 97.4% 97.4% 97.4% 97.4% 97.4% 99.1% 99.1% 97.4% 97.4% 97.4% 97.4% 97.4% 97.8%RNA19 S7 30 100.0% 96.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%RNA9 S8 54 94.4% 98.3% 98.1% 94.4% 92.6% 92.6% 94.4% 92.6% 92.6% 94.4% 94.4% 94.4% 90.7% 94.4% 92.6% 96.3% 94.4% 100.0% 94.4% 98.1% 96.3% 96.3% 92.6% 90.7% 98.1% 94.7%RNA5 S9 87 89.7% 99.0% 95.4% 87.4% 90.8% 88.5% 89.7% 87.4% 88.5% 86.2% 87.4% 88.5% 87.4% 86.2% 89.7% 88.5% 89.7% 85.1% 87.4% 98.9% 87.4% 88.5% 87.4% 89.7% 90.8% 89.2%SSUD S10 68 98.5% 98.6% 100.0% 98.5% 95.6% 95.6% 95.6% 95.6% 95.6% 92.6% 95.6% 97.1% 94.1% 94.1% 95.6% 97.1% 95.6% 94.1% 97.1% 100.0% 94.1% 95.6% 95.6% 95.6% 97.1% 96.1%SSUE S11 42 100.0% 97.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.8%SSUF S12 61 98.4% 98.4% 100.0% 98.4% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% 99.5%average SSU rRNA 804 95.3%.3% 97.8%.8% 94.9%.9% 96.0%.0% 98.9%.9% 95.4%.4% 96.3%.3% 94.8%.8% 95.1%.1% 96.3%.3% 95.1%.1% 96.0%.0% 94.5%.5% 95.3%.3% 95.3%.3% 95.5%.5% 95.8%.8% 95.5%.5% 95.9%.9% 99.3%.3% 95.4%.4% 95.5%.5% 95.1%.1% 95.3%.3% 95.3%.3% 95.8%.8%LSUA L1 176 97.7% 99.4% 99.3% 97.2% 96.6% 85.2% 97.7% 98.9% 97.7% 97.7% 85.2% 98.3% 97.2% 98.9% 97.2% 98.3% 99.3% 97.7% 98.3% 97.7% 98.9% 85.2% 97.2% 97.2% 97.7% 98.0%RNA2 L2 67 92.5% 98.6% 98.5% 94.0% 94.0% 92.5% 95.5% 92.5% 94.0% 94.0% 92.5% 95.5% 92.5% 92.5% 91.0% 95.5% 92.5% 92.5% 95.5% 100.0% 92.5% 94.0% 94.0% 92.5% 92.5% 94.1%LSUB L3 29 100.0% 96.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.6% 96.6% 93.1% 100.0% 96.6% 100.0% 96.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.2%LSUC L4 22 95.5% 95.7% 90.9% 95.5% 95.5% 95.5% 95.5% 86.4% 86.4% 90.9% 95.5% 95.5% 100.0% 90.9% 90.9% 100.0% 100.0% 90.9% 90.9% 100.0% 90.9% 95.5% 95.5% 95.5% 95.5% 94.2%RNA11 L5 57 91.2% 98.4% 98.2% 94.7% 89.5% 91.2% 93.0% 91.2% 91.2% 93.0% 93.0% 91.2% 91.2% 100.0% 89.5% 91.2% 89.5% 94.7% 93.0% 98.2% 91.2% 87.7% 87.7% 91.2% 91.2% 92.5%RNA1 L6 88 96.6% 98.9% 98.9% 96.6% 98.9% 96.6% 97.7% 93.2% 96.6% 95.5% 96.6% 98.9% 95.5% 98.9% 97.7% 95.5% 94.3% 95.5% 96.6% 100.0% 98.9% 96.6% 96.6% 96.6% 95.5% 96.9%RNA3 L7 81 95.1% 98.8% 100.0% 93.8% 95.1% 96.3% 96.3% 93.8% 93.8% 97.5% 96.3% 95.1% 95.1% 97.5% 96.3% 96.3% 95.1% 95.1% 96.3% 100.0% 97.5% 96.3% 96.3% 96.3% 95.1% 96.1%LSUD L8 83 97.6% 98.8% 100.0% 97.6% 97.6% 97.6% 97.6% 97.6% 97.6% 97.6% 98.8% 97.6% 97.6% 97.6% 98.8% 97.6% 98.8% 97.6% 97.6% 100.0% 97.6% 97.6% 97.6% 97.6% 97.6% 98.0%LSUELSUE L9L9 195195 98.5% 99.5% 100.0%100 99.5% 98.5% 98.5% 99.0% 97.4%97.4% 99.0% 97.9%97. 99.0% 99.0% 98.5% 97.9%97. 99.0% 98.5% 99.0% 96.9% 99.0% 100.0%100 97.4%97.4% 98.5% 98.5% 99.0% 99.0% 98.7%.7%RNA13 L10 30 96.7% 96.8% 100.0% 96.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.7% 96.7% 96.7% 96.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.7% 100.0% 96.7% 96.7% 100.0% 100.0% 96.7% 96.7% 100.0% 96.7% 96.7% 98.3%LSUF L11 115 98.3% 99.1% 100.0% 97.4% 99.1% 98.3% 99.1% 93.9% 98.3% 96.5% 99.1% 98.3% 98.3% 97.4% 98.3% 97.4% 100.0% 97.4% 98.3% 100.0% 97.4% 98.3% 98.3% 98.3% 98.3% 98.2%LSUG L12 107 98.1% 99.1% 99.1% 97.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.1% 99.7%RNA10 L13 100 82.0% 99.2% 100.0% 79.0% 87.0% 83.0% 90.0% 85.0% 78.0% 83.0% 82.0% 91.0% 88.0% 82.0% 78.0% 85.0% 88.0% 86.0% 85.0% 98.0% 83.0% 83.0% 83.0% 83.0% 82.0% 89.1%RNA18 L14 25 100.0% 96.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%RNA6 L15 58 96.6% 98.3% 100.0% 96.6% 96.6% 96.6% 98.3% 100.0% 98.3% 98.3% 98.3% 98.3% 98.3% 96.6% 98.3% 98.3% 98.3% 98.3% 98.3% 100.0% 100.0% 98.3% 96.6% 96.6% 96.6% 98.1%average LSU rRNA 1233 96.3% 99.2% 96.2% 96.5% 99.4% 96.8% 97.3% 95.5% 96.4% 97.2% 96.4% 97.1% 96.4% 97.1% 96.3% 96.5% 96.9% 95.9% 96.8% 99.5% 96.6% 96.8% 96.6% 96.7% 96.3% 96.9%average mt rRNAs 2037 95.9% 98.6% 95.7% 96.3% 99.2% 96.2% 96.9% 95.2% 95.9% 96.9% 95.9% 96.7% 95.7% 96.4% 95.9% 96.1% 96.5% 95.8% 96.4% 99.4% 96.1% 96.3% 96.0% 96.1% 95.9% 96.5%RNA4 unassigned unassigned 72 86.1%.1% 96.9%.9% 98.6%.6% 83.3%.3% 87.5%.5% 86.1%.1% 86.1%.1% 90.3%.3% 84.7%.7% 90.3%.3% 86.1%.1% 86.1%.1% 84.7%.7% 88.9%.9% 76.4%.4% 84.7%.7% 86.1%.1% 88.9%.9% 86.1%.1% 100.0%. 90.3%.3% 87.5%.5% 84.7%.7% 84.7%.7% 86.1%86. 87.7%.7%RNA7 unassigned 82 97.6% 97.6% 100.0% 96.3% 96.3% NDc 97.6% 96.3% 97.6% 96.3% NDc 97.6% 96.3% 96.3% 96.3% 97.6% NDc 95.1% 96.3% 100.0% 96.3% NDc 98.8% 98.8% 97.6% 97.3%RNA15 unassigned 31 100.0% 97.3% 100.0% 100.0% 87.1% 100.0% 87.1% 96.8% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 83.9% 100.0% 100.0% 87.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.2%RNA16 unassigned 31 96.8% 97.4% 100.0% 96.8% 96.8% 96.8% 96.8% 96.8% 93.5% 96.8% 96.8% 96.8% 96.8% 96.8% 96.8% 96.8% 96.8% 90.3% 96.8% 100.0% 96.8% 96.8% 96.8% 96.8% 96.8% 96.8%RNA20 unassigned 38 92.1% 100.0% 100.0% 92.1% 97.4% 97.4% 97.4% 100.0% 97.4% 97.4% 97.4% 97.4% 100.0% 97.4% 97.4% 97.4% 100.0% 100.0% 94.7% 100.0% 97.4% 97.4% 97.4% 97.4% 92.1% 97.4%RNA21 unassigned 36 97.2% 100.0% 100.0% 97.2% 100.0% 97.2% 100.0% 97.2% 100.0% 94.4% 97.2% 100.0% 100.0% 91.7% 94.4% 100.0% 100.0% 97.2% 100.0% 100.0% 94.4% 97.2% 97.2% 97.2% 97.2% 97.9%RNA22 unassigned 38 97.4% 100.0% 97.4% 94.7% 94.7% 94.7% 94.7% 94.7% 92.1% 94.7% 92.1% 94.7% 94.7% 92.1% 94.7% 92.1% 94.7% 100.0% 100.0% 97.4% 100.0% 94.7% 94.7% 94.7% 97.4% 95.5%total unassigned RNAs 328 94.8% 99.1% 93.9% 93.9% 99.4% 95.4% 93.9% 95.4% 95.1% 93.9% 96.3% 96.3% 94.8% 96.0% 93.3% 93.0% 96.0% 95.1% 93.9% 99.7% 96.3% 96.6% 95.7% 94.8% 94.8% 95.5%total small mt RNAs 2365 95.7% 98.7% 95.4% 96.0% 99.2% 96.1% 96.5% 95.2% 95.8% 96.4% 95.9% 96.6% 95.6% 96.3% 95.5% 95.7% 96.4% 95.7% 96.1% 99.5% 96.2% 96.4% 96.0% 95.9% 95.7% 96.3%
COBdCOB identical 376 89% 98% 99% 90% 91% 91% 91% 83% 91% 83% 91% 91% 88% 83% 91% 91% 90% 82% 91% 100% 83% 91% 91% 91% 89% 90%conserved 96% 99% 100% 97% 97% 97% 97% 91% 97% 92% 97% 97% 96% 91% 97% 97% 97% 92% 96% 100% 92% 97% 97% 97% 96% 96%
COX1d identical 477e 93% 96% 98% 92% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 93% 94% 93% 94% 94% 92% 93% 94% 95% 99% 94% 94% 94% 94% 92% 94%
conserved 98% 99% 99% 97% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 97% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 99% 100% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98%
COX3d identical 250e 84% 86% 88% 83% 84% 84% 86% 84% 85% 84% 84% 83% 84% 82% 85% 84% 83% 83% 81% 94% 84% 86% 84% 84% 84% 85%
conserved 91% 96% 97% 91% 92% 92% 92% 92% 93% 93% 92% 92% 92% 92% 92% 92% 92% 92% 91% 98% 93% 93% 93% 93% 91% 93%a Linear order of rRNA fragments, based on similarity to conventional rRNAs.b Sample collected from a mandrill, species not identified.c ND, not done. RNA7 similarity was not calculated for species from which its sequence is largely missing, presumably due to placement of PCR primers.d Amino acid sequence similarity is shown We calculated similarity on the basis of identity and also allowing for conservative amino acid replacements . , .e P. falciparum cox1 and cox3 lack conventional initiation codons and are presumed to use non-standard intiation codons [1] , common for mitochondrial proteins.
Table S4. Oligonucleotides used in this study.
Analysis Gene RACE Primer Sequence Positiona
RACE Analysis SSUB 5’ cDNA GTGTTCCACCGCTAGTGTTTGC 431-452
5’ PCR CCACTTGCTTATAACTGTATGGACG 463-487
SSUE 5’ CCAACAACATAACATTTTTTAGTCCCA 1794-1820
RNA1 3’ GCTGACTTGAGTAATGATA 559-578 rc
RNA4 3’ CATTTCTGAGTATTGAGCGGAAC 4647-4669
RNA6 5’ cDNA CTTGCCAACTCCCTATCATGTC 4839-4860 rc
5’ PCR GTCTTGCTAACGGCTTGTACGG 4820-4841 rc
3’ CCGTACAAGCCGTTAGCAAGACA 4820-4843
RNA9 5’ CAATCAAATTGGATGGTGTTGGC 83-105rc
3’ CCTAATTTACGGGTCGGTTGTGG 69-91 rc
RNA10 3’ GTACGAATAGACAATTGTGTTCATAGCTA 664-691
RNA11 5’ TTCAATTCGTACTTCCACTACCAG 5279-5302
3’ CATCGATATACGGATTTCTCCTG 5348-5370 rc
RNA12 3’ GGGATATTTGTAGTACACCTTGATTGG 4911-4937
RNA13 3’ GGGAAGTTTAGCCAGGAAGTCAGC 5001-5024 rc
RNA14 5’ CGAGTCGATCAGGAAGGTTTC 5519-5539
3’ GATGAAACCTTCCTGATCGACTCG 5519-5542 rc
RNA15 3’ CACACTTCCCTTCTCGCC 606-623
RNA16 5’ cDNA GGATGGTGTTGGCTGGGC 78-95 rc
5’ PCR GGTATCTCGTAATGTAGAACAA 9-30
3’ AAGCTTTTGGTATCTCGTAATGTAG 1-25
RNA17 3’ CTGTGTTACAAATTTTTGATCCCAGG 114-139
RNA18 3’ CGGTATTGCATGCCTGGTG 4968-4986
RNA19 3’ GTTCTTATGTGTTGGCATGG 5557-5576 rc
RNA20 5’ cDNA GGATGGTGTTGGCTGGGC 78-95 rc
5’ PCR GAAAAGGATTTGACGGTCAACTC 35-57 rc
3’ TGAGTTGACCGTCAAATCCTTTTCA 34-58
RNA21b 3’ GCATGGGACTAAAAAATGTTATGTTGTTG 1791-1820
5’ CCAACAACATAACATTTTTTAGTCCCA 1794-1821 rc
RNA22 5’ CAGGAGAAATCCGTATATCGATG 5348-5370
3’ CATCGATATACGGATTTCTCCTG 5348-5370 rc
Primer Extension LSUB TGATTACAGCTCCCAAGCAAAC 4594-4615
LSUC GAGCTATGACGCTATC 206-221
LSUF GAGCTCTATATATACTATAACC 1553-1574 rc
RNA6 GTCTTGCTAACGGCTTGTACGG 4820-4842 rc
RNA11 CAGGAGAAATCCGTATATCGATG 5348-5370
Analysis Gene RACE Primer Sequence Positiona
RNA12 CAATCAAGGTGTACTACAAATATC 4913-4936 rc
RNA13 GACGCTGACTTCCTGGCT 4998-5015
RNA14/RNA15 GTTTCTTTTACCTCACGAGTCGATC 5504-5528
RNA Blots LSUB TGATTACAGCTCCCAAGCAAAC 4594-4615
LSUC GAGCTATGACGCTATC 206-221
LSUF GAGCTCTATATATACTATAACC 1553-1574 rc
RNA12 CAATCAAGGTGTACTACAAATATC 4913-4936 rc
RNA13 GACGCTGACTTCCTGGCT 4998-5015
RNA14 GTTTCTTTTACCTCACGAGTCGATC 5504-5528
RNA15 TTCTATGGAAACACACTTC 595-613
RNA16 GTTCTACATTACGAGATACCAAAAGC 3-28 rc
a Position is given per Genbank entry M76611. rc, reverse complement. b The 5’ RACE primer for RNA21 overlapped the transcript start but generated products which correspond to the ends of
upstream RNAs.
Table S5. Plasmodium falciparum mt rRNA 3’end sequences
Fragment Sequence
SSUA GTATTATCCA TCCATGTCAG GCGTTAAAAG CGTTCGTTCT TATAGTGTAG
GUAUUAUCCA UCCAUGUCAG GCGUUAAAAG CGUUCGUUCU AAAAAAA
GUAUUAUCCA UCCAUGUCAG GCGUUAAAAG CGUUCGUUCU AAAAAAAAAAAAA (2)
GUAUUAUCCA UCCAUGUCAG GCGUUAAAAG CGUUCGUUCU AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
SSUB TTGTTTCATT TGATAGTAAA CACTATACCT TACCAATCTA TTTGAACTTG
UUGUUUCAUU UGAUAGUAAA CACUAUACCU UACCAAUCUA (4)
SSUD GACGTCAGGA AGTCCTGGAC GTTGAATCCA ATAGCATTGA TTAAAAGACA
GACGUCAGGA AGUCCUGGAC GUUGAAUCCA AUAGCAUUGA AAA
GACGUCAGGA AGUCCUGGAC GUUGAAUCCA AUAGCAUUGA AA
GACGUCAGGA AGUCCUGGAC GUUGAAUCCA AUAGCAUUGA
SSUF AACATGGTAG TTGACAGTGA ACTTGTAGCT GAACCAAAAA TGGCTGCTGG
AACAUGGUAG UUGACAGUGA ACUUGUAGCU GAACCAAAAA
AACAUGGUAG UUGACAGUGA ACUUGUAGCU GAACCAAAAA AAA
AACAUGGUAG UUGACAGUGA ACUUGUAGCU GAACCAAAAA AAAAAA (2)
LSUA TAGACGGTTT TCTGCGAAAT CTATTTGGAA GATATATCAT TGGGAAGTTT
UAGACGGUUU UCUGCGAAAU CUAUUUGGAA GAUAUAUCAU AAAAAAAAAAAAA
LSUD TGATGAATAT TTCAAGTTAC TGACATCTGC CCGGCATCAA TGATAAACGG
UGAUGAAUAU UUCAAGUUAC UGACAUCUGC CCGGCAUCAA AA
UGAUGAAUAU UUCAAGUUAC UGACAUCUGC CCGGCAUCAA AAA
LSUE GCCCGACGGT AAGACCCTGA GCACCTTAAC TTCCCTAAAA GTTCTTATGT
GCCCGACGGU AAGACCCUGA GCACCUUAAC UUCCCUAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
LSUF CTATTGGCAC CTCCATGTCG TCTCATCGCA GCCTTGCAAT AAATAATATC
CUAUUGGCAC CUCCAUGUCG UCUCAUCGCA GCCUUGCAAU AAAAAA
CUAUUGGCAC CUCCAUGUCG UCUCAUCGCA GCCUUGCAAU AAAAAAAA
CUAUUGGCAC CUCCAUGUCG UCUCAUCGCA GCCUUGCAAU AAAAAAAAA
LSUG AGAACGTCTT GAGGCAGTTT GTTCCCTATC TACCGTTTTA TCTTTGCATG
AGAACGUCUU GAGGCAGUUU GUUCCCUAUC UACCGUUUUA AAAAAAAAAAA
AGAACGUCUU GAGGCAGUUU GUUCCCUAUC UACCGUUUUA AAAAAAAAAAAA
RNA1 AGCTATCCAT AGTTAATTGA TTCCGTTTTG ACCGGTCATT TTCTTTGCCT
AGCUAUCCAU AGUUAAUUGA UUCCGUUUUG ACCGGUCAUU AAAA
RNA2 TGAGATGGAA ACAGCCGGAA AGGTAATTTT ACGCCCTTAA CGTAAAGATC
UGAGAUGGAA ACAGCCGGAA AGGUAAUUUU ACGCCCUUAA AAAAAAAAAA
UGAGAUGGAA ACAGCCGGAA AGGUAAUUUU ACGCCCUUAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
UGAGAUGGAA ACAGCCGGAA AGGUAAUUUU ACGCCCUUAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
RNA3 CTGTGAGGAA ACTACATTAA AGGAACTCGA CTGGCCTACA CTATAAGAAG
CUGUGAGGAA ACUACAUUAA AGGAACUCGA CUGGCCUACA AAAAAA (2)
Fragment Sequence
CUGUGAGGAA ACUACAUUAA AGGAACUCGA CUGGCCUACA AAAAAAAA (2)
RNA4 GATTGAGCGG AACAAATCAG ACCGTAAGGT TATAATTATG TACTATGATT
GAUUGAGCGG AACAAAUCAG ACCGUAAGGU UAUAAUUAUG AAA (2)
RNA5 TTACAGTATC AATCGGATTT ACATGCTCAG CCGCCAAAAA CTATAACGAT
UUACAGUAUC AAUCGGAUUU ACAUGCUCAG CCGCCAAAAA AAAAAAAAAA
UUACAGUAUC AAUCGGAUUU ACAUGCUCAG CCGCCAAAAA AAAAAA
RNA6 AAGCCGTTAG CAAGACATGA TAGGGAGTTG GCAAGTTAAA GAAGTTCTG
AAGCCGUUAG CAAGACAUGA UAGGGAGUUG GCAAGUUAAA A
AAGCCGUUAG CAAGACAUGA UAGGGAGUUG GCAAGUUAAA AA (2)
RNA7 AATCGAGAGA GATTCCATTA GTTGTCTCTA TGAATAGTGG TTATAGCCAT
AAUCGAGAGA GAUUCCAUUA GUUGUCUCUA UGAAUAGUGG AAAAAAAAAA
AAUCGAGAGA GAUUCCAUUA GUUGUCUCUA UGAAUAGUGG AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA (2)
RNA8 CCCGGGAAAC CGGCGCTTCC ATTTATAAGA AGTTAAATTA CTGGAAGCGT
CCCGGGAAAC CGGCGCUUCC AUUUAUAAGA AGUUAAAUUA AAAAAAA
CCCGGGAAAC CGGCGCUUCC AUUUAUAAGA AGUUAAAUUA AAAAAAAAAAAAA
CCCGGGAAAC CGGCGCUUCC AUUUAUAAGA AGUUAAAUUA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA (3)
CCCGGGAAAC CGGCGCUUCC AUUUAUAAGA AGUUAAAUUA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
CCCGGGAAAC CGGCGCUUCC AUUUAUAAGA AGUUAAAUUA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
RNA9 AACACCATCC AATTTGATTG GGAATTATCT GTGTTACAAA TTTTTGATCC
AACACCAUCC AAUUUGAUUG GGAAUUAUCU GUGUUACAAA
AACACCAUCC AAUUUGAUUG GGAAUUAUCU GUGUUACAAA A
AACACCAUCC AAUUUGAUUG GGAAUUAUCU GUGUUACAAA AAA
AACACCAUCC AAUUUGAUUG GGAAUUAUCU GUGUUACAAA AAAAAA
AACACCAUCC AAUUUGAUUG GGAAUUAUCU GUGUUACAAA AAAAAAAAAA
AACACCAUCC AAUUUGAUUG GGAAUUAUCU GUGUUACAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA
RNA10 TAGAGTACGT AAGGAAAAGG AAAGGTTAAC CGCTATCAAA TGGCGAGAAG
UAGAGUACGU AAGGAAAAGG AAAGGUUAAC CGCUAUCAAA AAAAAAAAA
UAGAGUACGU AAGGAAAAGG AAAGGUUAAC CGCUAUCAAA AAAAAAAA
RNA11 TTTAGAACAG GAGAGTATAT TCTGGTAGTG GAAGTACGAA TTGAAGTGGA
UUUAGAACAG GAGAGUAUAU UCUGGUAGUG GAAGUACGAA AAAAAAAAA
RNA12 TGTATGGGAT ATTTGTAGTA CACCTTGATT GGTTTTACTA TTTATACTTA
UGUAUGGGAU AUUUGUAGUA CACCUUGAUU GGUUUUACUA AAAAAAAAAAAA (2)
UGUAUGGGAU AUUUGUAGUA CACCUUGAUU GGUUUUACUA AAAAAAAAAAAAA
UGUAUGGGAU AUUUGUAGUA CACCUUGAUU GGUUUUACUA AAAAAGAAAAAAAAAAAA
UGUAUGGGAU AUUUGUAGUA CACCUUGAUU GGUUUUACUA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
RNA13 GATATATCAT TGGGAAGTTT AGCCAGGAAG TCAGCGTCTA TATTAAAAA
5’ UGGGAAGUUU AGCCAGGAAG UCAGCGUCUA AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Fragment Sequence
RNA14 TTAAGGATGA AACCTTCCTG ATCGACTCGT GAGGTAAAAG AAACAGTCCG
5’ UUAAGGAUGA AACCUUCCUG AUCGACUCGU GAGGUAAAAG AA
UUAAGGAUGA AACCUUCCUG AUCGACUCGU GAGGUAAAAG AAA
UUAAGGAUGA AACCUUCCUG AUCGACUCGU GAGGUAAAAG AAAAAAAA
UUAAGGAUGA AACCUUCCUG AUCGACUCGU GAGGUAAAAG AAAAAAAAAA
UUAAGGAUGA AACCUUCCUG AUCGACUCGU GAGGUAAAAG AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
RNA15 GCTATCAAAT GGCGAGAAGG GAAGTGTGTT TCCATAGAAA CCTTGTATAT
5’ U GGCGAGAAGG GAAGUGUGUU UCCAUAGAAA AAAAAAAAA
RNA16 TATAATAAAG CTTTTGGTAT CTCGTAATGT AGAACAATAT TGAGTTGACC
5’ G CUUUUGGUAU CUCGUAAUGU AGAACAAUAU A
G CUUUUGGUAU CUCGUAAUGU AGAACAAUAU AA (3)
G CUUUUGGUAU CUCGUAAUGU AGAACAAUAU AAAA (3)
G CUUUUGGUAU CUCGUAAUGU AGAACAAUAU AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
RNA17 TTTTTGATCC CAGGCTGGTA AAAAATGTAA ACTTTTAGCC CATAAGAATA
UUUUUGAUCC CAGGCUGGUA AAAAAUGUAA ACUUUUAGCC AAAAAAA
RNA18 ATACTTATCG ATAAATGTTC GGTATTGCAT GCCTGGTGTT TTTAATATAG
5’ UGUUC GGUAUUGCAU GCCUGGUGUU AAAAAAAAA (2)
UGUUC GGUAUUGCAU GCCUGGUGUU AAAAAAAAAAA
UGUUC GGUAUUGCAU GCCUGGUGUU AAAAAAAAAAAA
UGUUC GGUAUUGCAU GCCUGGUGUU AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA (2)
RNA19 TTCCCTAAAA GTTCTTATGT GTTGGCATGG TTACGAGATT AAGGATGTTT
5’ GUUCUUAUGU GUUGGCAUGG UUACGAGAUU AAAAAAAA
GUUCUUAUGU GUUGGCAUGG UUACGAGAUU AAAAAAAAA
GUUCUUAUGU GUUGGCAUGG UUACGAGAUU AAAAAAAAAAAAA
GUUCUUAUGU GUUGGCAUGG UUACGAGAUU AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
GUUCUUAUGU GUUGGCAUGG UUACGAGAUU AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA (2)
RNA20 ATTGAGTTGA CCGTCAAATC CTTTTCATTA AAAGAGTGGA TTAAATGCCC
5’ UGAGUUGA CCGUCAAAUC CUUUUCAUUA AAAGAGUGGA AAAAAAAAAAA
UGAGUUGA CCGUCAAAUC CUUUUCAUUA AAAGAGUGGA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA (2)
RNA21 AGCATGGGAC TAAAAAATGT TATGTTGTTG GTTTAAGCCC TATTACCATA
AGCATGGGAC TAAAAAATGT TATGTTGTTG GTTTAAGCCC AAAAAA
AGCATGGGAC TAAAAAATGT TATGTTGTTG GTTTAAGCCC AAAAAAA (2)
AGCATGGGAC TAAAAAATGT TATGTTGTTG GTTTAAGCCC AAAAAAAA
RNA22 GATTAAAAGA CATCGATATA CGGATTTCTC CTGAAAAAAC GCGAAAAACC
5’ UUAAAAGA CAUCGAUAUA CGGAUUUCUC CUGAAAAAAC AA
The top sequence (in bold italics) for each set of RACE data corresponds to the genomic DNA sequence.
Numbers in parentheses indicate how often that size of tail was found.
Table S6. Abutted P. falciparum mt gene sets
Description Members Size (nt)
RNA16 to RNA17 4 163
RNA8 to RNA13 12 959
cox3 to LSUG 6a 1205
cox1 to RNA4 3 2660
a If RNA23t through RNA27t are included, this run is cox3 to RNA23t, 10 members, 1317 nt.
Table S7. Fragment placement in rRNA alignments for covariation
analysis
Fragmenta rRNA
b Hemosporidians
c Coccidian
d Piroplasms
e
SSUA SSU +f + +
SSUB SSU + + +
SSUD SSU + + +
SSUE SSU + + +
SSUF SSU + + +
LSUA LSU + + +
LSUB LSU + + +
LSUC LSU + + +
LSUD LSU + + +
LSUE LSU + + +
LSUF LSU + + +
LSUG LSU + + +
RNA1 LSU + + +
RNA2 LSU + + +
RNA3 LSU + + +
RNA5 SSU +
RNA6 LSU + +
RNA8 SSU + + +
RNA9 SSU + +
RNA10 LSU + + +
RNA11 LSU + +
RNA12 SSU +
RNA13 LSU + + +
RNA14 SSU + +
RNA17 SSU + + +
RNA18 LSU + + +
RNA19 SSU +
COUNTS 27 20 24
a Gene names are as defined in Table 1.
b LSU, large subunit rRNA; SSU, small subunit rRNA. Fragments not assigned: RNA4, RNA7, RNA15,
RNA16, RNA20, RNA21, RNA22, RNA23t, RNA24t, RNA25t, RNA26t, RNA27t.
c RNAs from Plasmodium and related species that were used for co-variation analysis.
d RNAs from Eimeria tenella that were used for co-variation analysis.
e RNAs from Babesia and Theileria that were used for co-variation analysis.
f +, present; blank if absent.
Table S8. Prospective covariations found in fragmented apicomplexan mt rRNA genes.
rRNAa Pairb (Fragmentsc)
Categoryd Hemosporidiane + Coccidianf + Piroplasmg
LSU 581,1259
(LSUA,RNA1) 2
ug=( 16, 16.00, 94.1%) h, i ag=( 1, 1.00, 5.9%)
ug=( 16, 16.00, 94.1%) j ag=( 1, 1.00, 5.9%)
ug=( 16, 12.36, 72.7%) aa=( 5, 1.36, 22.7%) ag=( 1, 4.64, 4.5%)
LSU 583,1257
(LSUA,RNA1) 2
ac=(192, 192.00, 97.0%) gc=( 6, 6.00, 3.0%)
ac=(192, 192.00, 97.0%) gc=( 6, 6.00, 3.0%)
ac=(192, 184.54, 93.2%) uu=( 8, 0.31, 3.9%) gc=( 6, 5.77, 2.9%)
LSU 589,668 (LSUA)
2 cg=(198, 198.00, 100.0%) cg=(199, 199.00, 100.0%) cg=(199, 191.31, 96.1%)
au=( 5, 0.19, 2.4%) gu=( 3, 0.12, 1.4%)
LSU 590,667 (LSUA)
2 au=(198, 198.00, 100.0%) au=(198, 198.00, 99.5%)
aa=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
au=(198, 190.35, 95.7%) ua=( 8, 0.35, 3.9%) aa=( 1, 8.65, 0.5%)
LSU 591,666 (LSUA)
2 ua=(198, 198.00, 100.0%) ua=(198, 198.00, 99.5%)
aa=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
ua=(198, 190.35, 95.7%) au=( 8, 0.35, 3.9%) aa=( 1, 8.65, 0.5%)
LSU 672,808 (LSUA)
1 ug=(198, 198.00, 100.0%) ug=(199, 199.00, 100.0%) ug=(199, 191.31, 96.1%)
au=( 8, 0.31, 3.9%)
LSU 679,798 (LSUA)
2 cg=(200, 200.00, 98.5%) -g=( 3, 3.00, 1.5%)
cg=(201, 201.00, 98.5%) -g=( 3, 3.00, 1.5%)
cg=(201, 193.42, 94.8%) aa=( 8, 0.30, 3.8%) -g=( 3, 2.89, 1.4%)
LSU 680,797 (LSUA)
2 au=(200, 200.00, 98.5%) -u=( 3, 3.00, 1.5%)
au=(201, 201.00, 98.5%) -u=( 3, 3.00, 1.5%)
au=(201, 193.42, 94.8%) ua=( 8, 0.30, 3.8%) -u=( 3, 2.89, 1.4%)
LSU 693,769 (LSUA)
2
au=(200, 200.00, 98.5%) -u=( 3, 3.00, 1.5%)
au=(200, 200.00, 98.0%) -u=( 3, 3.00, 1.5%) uu=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
au=(200, 192.45, 94.3%) ua=( 8, 0.34, 3.8%) -u=( 3, 2.89, 1.4%) uu=( 1, 8.66, 0.5%)
LSU 694,768 (LSUA)
2
cg=(200, 200.00, 98.5%) -g=( 3, 3.00, 1.5%)
cg=(200, 200.00, 98.0%) -g=( 3, 3.00, 1.5%) ag=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
cg=(200, 192.45, 94.3%) ua=( 8, 0.30, 3.8%) -g=( 3, 2.89, 1.4%) ag=( 1, 0.96, 0.5%)
rRNAa Pairb (Fragmentsc)
Categoryd Hemosporidiane + Coccidianf + Piroplasmg
LSU 695,767 (LSUA)
2
gc=(200, 200.00, 98.5%) -c=( 3, 3.00, 1.5%)
gc=(200, 200.00, 98.0%) -c=( 3, 3.00, 1.5%) ac=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
gc=(200, 192.45, 94.3%) au=( 8, 0.34, 3.8%) -c=( 3, 2.89, 1.4%) ac=( 1, 8.66, 0.5%)
LSU 696,766 (LSUA)
2 au=(200, 200.00, 98.5%) -u=( 3, 3.00, 1.5%)
au=(201, 201.00, 98.5%) -u=( 3, 3.00, 1.5%)
au=(201, 193.42, 94.8%) ua=( 8, 0.30, 3.8%) -u=( 3, 2.89, 1.4%)
LSU 697,765 (LSUA)
1 au=(203, 203.00, 100.0%) au=(204, 204.00, 100.0%) au=(204, 196.30, 96.2%)
ua=( 8, 0.30, 3.8%)
LSU 698,763 (LSUA)
2
cg=(203, 203.00, 97.1%) ug=( 6, 6.00, 2.9%)
cg=(204, 204.00, 97.1%) ug=( 6, 6.00, 2.9%)
cg=(204, 198.39, 93.6%) ug=( 8, 8.75, 3.7%) au=( 5, 0.11, 2.3%) ua=( 1, 0.04, 0.5%)
LSU 700,732 (LSUA)
2
gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 205.19, 96.3%) au=( 5, 0.19, 2.3%) ac=( 2, 6.81, 0.9%) gu=( 1, 5.81, 0.5%)
LSU 701,731 (LSUA)
1 gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 202.29, 96.3%)
ua=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
LSU 741,756 (LSUA)
1 gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 202.29, 96.3%)
cg=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
LSU 744,753 (LSUA)
1 ua=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ua=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) ua=(210, 202.29, 96.3%)
cg=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
LSU 779,785 (LSUA)
1 ug=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ug=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) ug=(210, 202.29, 96.3%)
au=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
LSU 824,833 (LSUA)
1 ua=(208, 207.00, 99.5%) au=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
ua=(209, 208.00, 99.5%) au=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
ua=(217, 216.00, 99.5%) au=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
LSU 946,971 (RNA2)
1 au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(209, 208.00, 99.5%)
gc=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%) au=(209, 200.37, 95.9%) gc=( 9, 0.37, 4.1%)
rRNAa Pairb (Fragmentsc)
Categoryd Hemosporidiane + Coccidianf + Piroplasmg
LSU 950,967 (RNA2)
1 cg=(208, 207.00, 99.5%) ua=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
cg=(209, 208.00, 99.5%) ua=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
cg=(209, 200.37, 95.9%) au=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%) ua=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
LSU 953,964 (RNA2)
2 gg=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gg=(209, 209.00, 99.5%)
ug=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
gg=(209, 201.33, 95.9%) ua=( 8, 0.33, 3.7%) ug=( 1, 8.67, 0.5%)
LSU 976,987 (RNA2)
1 ug=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ug=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) ug=(210, 202.29, 96.3%)
au=( 6, 0.17, 2.8%) gc=( 2, 0.02, 0.9%)
LSU 977,986 (RNA2)
1 gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 202.29, 96.3%)
cg=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
LSU 1002,1153
(RNA2,RNA11) 1
cg=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) cg=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) cg=(209, 201.29, 96.3%) aa=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
LSU 1164,1185 (RNA11)
1 au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(209, 201.29, 96.3%)
ua=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
LSU 1166,1183 (RNA11)
2 au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(209, 203.22, 96.3%)
gc=( 6, 0.22, 2.8%) gu=( 2, 7.78, 0.9%)
LSU 1196,1250
(RNA11,RNA1) 2
gu=(207, 207.00, 99.0%) uu=( 2, 2.00, 1.0%)
gu=(207, 207.00, 99.0%) uu=( 2, 2.00, 1.0%)
gu=(207, 199.37, 95.4%) ua=( 8, 0.37, 3.7%) uu=( 2, 9.63, 0.9%)
LSU 1198,1247
(RNA11,RNA1) 2
ua=(208, 208.00, 99.5%) ug=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
ua=(208, 208.00, 99.5%) ug=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
ua=(208, 200.33, 95.9%) au=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%) ug=( 1, 0.96, 0.5%)
LSU 1656,2004
(RNA3,LSUE) 2
ca=(202, 202.00, 96.7%) ua=( 6, 6.00, 2.9%) aa=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
ca=(203, 203.00, 96.7%) ua=( 6, 6.00, 2.9%) aa=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
ca=(203, 195.55, 93.1%) au=( 8, 0.33, 3.7%) ua=( 6, 5.78, 2.8%) aa=( 1, 8.67, 0.5%)
LSU 1658,2002
(RNA3,LSUE) 1
au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) au=(210, 202.29, 96.3%) ua=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
rRNAa Pairb (Fragmentsc)
Categoryd Hemosporidiane + Coccidianf + Piroplasmg
LSU 1659,2001
(RNA3,LSUE) 2
cg=(198, 189.47, 94.7%) ua=( 4, 0.11, 1.9%) au=( 4, 0.08, 1.9%) ug=( 2, 5.74, 1.0%) gc=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
cg=(199, 190.47, 94.8%) ua=( 4, 0.11, 1.9%) au=( 4, 0.08, 1.9%) ug=( 2, 5.74, 1.0%) gc=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
cg=(199, 183.48, 91.3%) ua=( 12, 0.77, 5.5%) au=( 4, 0.07, 1.8%) ug=( 2, 12.91, 0.9%) gc=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
LSU 1661,1999
(RNA3,LSUE) 2
ug=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ug=(209, 209.00, 99.5%) ua=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
ug=(209, 201.33, 95.9%) gc=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%) ua=( 1, 0.96, 0.5%)
LSU 1663,1997
(RNA3,LSUE) 1
au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) au=(210, 202.29, 96.3%) gc=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
LSU 1766,1986
(LSUD,LSUE) 1
gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 202.29, 96.3%) au=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
LSU 1767,1985
(LSUD,LSUE) 1
gc=(208, 207.00, 99.5%) au=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
gc=(208, 206.02, 99.0%) au=( 2, 0.02, 1.0%)
gc=(216, 214.02, 99.1%) au=( 2, 0.02, 0.9%)
LSU 1794,1825
(LSUD) 1
ua=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ua=(209, 208.00, 99.5%) au=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
ua=(209, 200.37, 95.9%) au=( 9, 0.37, 4.1%)
LSU 1795,1824
(LSUD) 2
cu=(208, 208.00, 99.5%) uu=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
cu=(209, 209.00, 99.5%) uu=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
cu=(213, 209.09, 97.7%) ua=( 3, 0.07, 1.4%) uc=( 1, 0.02, 0.5%) uu=( 1, 4.91, 0.5%)
LSU 1797,1822
(LSUD) 1
cg=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 202.29, 96.3%) au=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
LSU 1800,1817
(LSUD) 1
au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(209, 208.00, 99.5%) cg=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
au=(209, 200.37, 95.9%) cg=( 9, 0.37, 4.1%)
LSU 1804,1813
(LSUD) 2
ua=(202, 201.03, 96.7%) ca=( 6, 6.97, 2.9%) cg=( 1, 0.03, 0.5%)
ua=(202, 200.08, 96.2%) ca=( 6, 7.92, 2.9%) cg=( 2, 0.08, 1.0%)
ua=(202, 192.73, 92.7%) gc=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%) ca=( 6, 7.63, 2.8%) cg=( 2, 0.07, 0.9%)
LSU 1805,1812
(LSUD) 1
ua=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ua=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) ua=(210, 202.29, 96.3%) au=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
rRNAa Pairb (Fragmentsc)
Categoryd Hemosporidiane + Coccidianf + Piroplasmg
LSU 1806,1811
(LSUD) 2
cg=(208, 207.00, 99.5%) ua=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
cg=(208, 207.01, 99.0%) ua=( 1, 0.01, 0.5%) ug=( 1, 1.99, 0.5%)
cg=(208, 199.41, 95.4%) ua=( 9, 0.41, 4.1%) ug=( 1, 9.59, 0.5%)
LSU 1830,1975
(LSUD,LSUE) 1
cg=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) cg=(211, 204.22, 96.8%) ua=( 7, 0.22, 3.2%)
LSU 1831,1974
(LSUD,LSUE) 1
au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) au=(217, 216.00, 99.5%) gc=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
LSU 1836,1904
(LSUD,LSUE) 1
cg=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 206.07, 98.1%) uu=( 4, 0.07, 1.9%)
LSU 1837,1903
(LSUD,LSUE) 1
cg=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 206.07, 98.1%) uu=( 4, 0.07, 1.9%)
LSU 1843,1897
(LSUD,LSUE) 1
ua=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ua=(209, 208.00, 99.5%) cg=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
ua=(209, 208.00, 99.5%) cg=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
LSU 1906,1924
(LSUE) 2
gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 206.07, 98.1%) a-=( 2, 0.02, 0.9%) ua=( 2, 0.02, 0.9%)
LSU 1907,1923
(LSUE) 2
gu=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gu=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) gu=(210, 205.12, 97.7%) cg=( 2, 0.05, 0.9%) ug=( 2, 0.05, 0.9%) ag=( 1, 0.02, 0.5%)
LSU 1909,1921
(LSUE) 2
ug=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ug=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) ug=(211, 204.22, 96.8%) au=( 2, 0.05, 0.9%) a-=( 2, 0.05, 0.9%) ca=( 2, 0.03, 0.9%) aa=( 1, 0.07, 0.5%)
LSU 1925,1929
(LSUE) 2
cg=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 202.29, 96.3%) ac=( 3, 0.04, 1.4%) uu=( 3, 0.07, 1.4%) ua=( 2, 0.05, 0.9%)
LSU 1945,1961
(LSUE) 1
gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 202.29, 96.3%) au=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
rRNAa Pairb (Fragmentsc)
Categoryd Hemosporidiane + Coccidianf + Piroplasmg
LSU 1947,1959
(LSUE) 2
cg=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 203.26, 96.3%) ua=( 7, 0.26, 3.2%) ug=( 1, 7.74, 0.5%)
LSU 1948,1958
(LSUE) 1
gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) gc=(214, 210.07, 98.2%) au=( 4, 0.07, 1.8%)
LSU 1949,1957
(LSUE) 1
gc=(208, 207.00, 99.5%) au=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
gc=(209, 208.00, 99.5%) au=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
gc=(209, 200.37, 95.9%) ua=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%) au=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
LSU 1950,1956
(LSUE) 2
gu=(206, 204.03, 98.6%) aa=( 2, 0.03, 1.0%) ga=( 1, 2.97, 0.5%)
gu=(207, 205.03, 98.6%) aa=( 2, 0.03, 1.0%) ga=( 1, 2.97, 0.5%)
gu=(207, 197.50, 95.0%) ca=( 8, 0.40, 3.7%) aa=( 2, 0.10, 0.9%) ga=( 1, 10.50, 0.5%)
LSU 2024,2039
(LSUE) 2
ua=(208, 208.00, 99.5%) ug=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
ua=(209, 209.00, 99.5%) ug=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
ua=(209, 201.33, 95.9%) gc=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%) ug=( 1, 0.96, 0.5%)
LSU 2025,2038
(LSUE) 1
cg=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) cg=(213, 208.11, 97.7%) au=( 5, 0.11, 2.3%)
LSU 2026,2037
(LSUE) 1
cg=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 202.29, 96.3%) ua=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
LSU 2027,2036
(LSUE) 1
au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(209, 208.00, 99.5%) ua=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
au=(209, 200.37, 95.9%) ua=( 9, 0.37, 4.1%)
LSU 2047,2621
(LSUE,LSUG) 2
cg=(208, 207.00, 99.5%) ua=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
cg=(208, 206.02, 99.0%) ua=( 2, 0.02, 1.0%)
cg=(208, 198.46, 95.4%) ua=( 9, 0.41, 4.1%) uu=( 1, 0.05, 0.5%)
LSU 2048,2620
(LSUE,LSUG) 2
gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 202.29, 96.3%) au=( 7, 0.26, 3.2%) aa=( 1, 0.04, 0.5%)
LSU 2049,2619
(LSUE,LSUG) 1
gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 202.29, 96.3%) cg=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
LSU 2080,2240
(LSUE,RNA13) 2
ua=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ua=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) ua=(216, 215.01, 99.1%) cg=( 1, 0.01, 0.5%) ug=( 1, 1.99, 0.5%)
rRNAa Pairb (Fragmentsc)
Categoryd Hemosporidiane + Coccidianf + Piroplasmg
LSU 2461,2489
(LSUF) 1
gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) gc=(213, 208.11, 97.7%) au=( 5, 0.11, 2.3%)
LSU 2462,2488
(LSUF) 1
ua=(206, 203.04, 98.6%) au=( 3, 0.04, 1.4%)
ua=(206, 202.08, 98.1%) au=( 4, 0.08, 1.9%)
ua=(206, 194.66, 94.5%) au=( 12, 0.66, 5.5%)
LSU 2463,2487
(LSUF) 1
au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) au=(210, 202.09, 96.3%) ua=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
LSU 2466,2484
(LSUF) 2
ua=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ua=(209, 209.00, 99.5%) ug=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
ua=(209, 201.33, 95.9%) au=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%) ug=( 1, 0.96, 0.5%)
LSU 2470,2480
(LSUF) 2
gc=(207, 205.02, 99.0%) au=( 2, 0.02, 1.0%)
gc=(208, 206.02, 99.0%) au=( 2, 0.02, 1.0%)
gc=(208, 198.46, 95.4%) au=( 4, 0.11, 1.8%) ug=( 3, 0.06, 1.4%) aa=( 2, 0.08, 0.9%) ua=( 1, 0.06, 0.5%)
LSU 2514,2570
(LSUF,LSUG) 1
ua=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ua=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) ua=(210, 202.29, 96.3%) cg=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
LSU 2516,2568
(LSUF,LSUG) 1
gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(209, 208.00, 99.5%) au=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
gc=(209, 200.37, 95.9%) au=( 9, 0.37, 4.1%)
LSU 2517,2567
(LSUF,LSUG) 1
cg=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 202.29, 96.3%) ua=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
LSU 2524,2539
(LSUG) 2
gc=(208, 208.00, 99.5%) gu=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
gc=(209, 209.00, 99.5%) gu=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
gc=(209, 201.33, 95.9%) au=( 8, 0.33, 3.7%) gu=( 1, 8.67, 0.5%)
LSU 2527,2536
(LSUG) 1
cg=(195, 181.94, 93.3%) ua=( 14, 0.94, 6.7%)
cg=(196, 182.93, 93.3%) ua=( 14, 0.93, 6.7%)
cg=(204, 190.90, 93.6%) ua=( 14, 0.90, 6.4%)
LSU 2547,2561
(LSUG) 1
au=(207, 205.02, 99.0%) ua=( 2, 0.02, 1.0%)
au=(208, 206.02, 99.0%) ua=( 2, 0.02, 1.0%)
au=(216, 214.02, 99.1%) ua=( 2, 0.02, 0.9%)
LSU 2594,2599
(LSUG) 1
cg=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) cg=(213, 208.11, 97.7%) ua=( 5, 0.11, 2.3%)
rRNAa Pairb (Fragmentsc)
Categoryd Hemosporidiane + Coccidianf + Piroplasmg
LSU 2742,2762
(RNA6) 2
ug=(195, 195.00, 93.3%) cg=( 14, 14.00, 6.7%)
ug=(195, 195.00, 93.3%) cg=( 14, 14.00, 6.7%)
ug=(195, 187.81, 89.9%) cg=( 14, 13.48, 6.5%) au=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
LSU 2743,2761
(RNA6) 2
au=(206, 206.00, 98.6%) uu=( 3, 3.00, 1.4%)
au=(206, 206.00, 98.6%) uu=( 3, 3.00, 1.4%)
au=(206, 198.41, 94.9%) ug=( 8, 0.41, 3.7%) uu=( 3, 10.59, 1.4%)
LSU 2744,2760
(RNA6) 2
gu=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gu=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gu=(209, 201.29, 96.3%) aa=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
SSU 27,556
(RNA14,SSUA) 2
gc=(208, 208.00, 99.5%) ac=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
gc=(208, 208.00, 99.5%) ac=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
gc=(208, 200.33, 95.9%) aa=( 8, 0.33, 3.7%) ac=( 1, 8.67, 0.5%)
SSU 28,555
(RNA14,SSUA) 1
gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(209, 201.29, 96.3%) ua=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
SSU 30,553
(RNA14,SSUA) 2
ua=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ua=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ua=(209, 202.26, 96.3%) cg=( 7, 0.26, 3.2%) ug=( 1, 7.74, 0.5%)
SSU 32,552
(RNA14,SSUA) 1
au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(209, 201.29, 96.3%) ua=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
SSU 39,403
(RNA14) 2
cg=(205, 205.00, 98.1%) gg=( 3, 3.00, 1.4%) ag=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
cg=(205, 205.00, 98.1%) gg=( 3, 3.00, 1.4%) ag=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
cg=(205, 197.44, 94.5%) gc=( 5, 0.18, 2.3%) au=( 3, 0.06, 1.4%) gg=( 3, 7.71, 1.4%) ag=( 1, 3.85, 0.5%)
SSU 40,402
(RNA14) 2
cg=(206, 206.00, 98.6%) ag=( 3, 3.00, 1.4%)
cg=(206, 206.00, 98.6%) ag=( 3, 3.00, 1.4%)
cg=(206, 198.41, 94.9%) ua=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%) ag=( 3, 2.89, 1.4%)
SSU 41,401
(RNA14) 1
ua=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ua=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ua=(214, 211.04, 98.6%) au=( 3, 0.04, 1.4%)
SSU 293,304 (RNA17)
2 gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(209, 209.00, 99.5%)
ga=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
gc=(209, 201.33, 95.9%) au=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%) ga=( 1, 0.96, 0.5%)
rRNAa Pairb (Fragmentsc)
Categoryd Hemosporidiane + Coccidianf + Piroplasmg
SSU 504,541 (SSUA)
2
ug=(110, 110.00, 52.6%) cg=( 98, 98.00, 46.9%) gg=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
ug=(111, 111.00, 52.9%) cg=( 98, 98.00, 46.7%) gg=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
ug=(111, 106.93, 50.9%) cg=( 98, 94.40, 45.0%) au=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%) gg=( 1, 0.96, 0.5%)
SSU 505,526 (SSUA)
2 ga=(207, 207.00, 99.0%) aa=( 2, 2.00, 1.0%)
ga=(208, 208.00, 99.0%) aa=( 2, 2.00, 1.0%)
ga=(208, 200.37, 95.4%) ac=( 8, 0.37, 3.7%) aa=( 2, 9.63, 0.9%)
SSU 507,524 (SSUA)
2 ua=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ua=(209, 208.00, 99.5%)
ag=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%) ua=(209, 200.37, 95.9%) ag=( 9, 0.37, 4.1%)
SSU 511,540 (SSUA)
2 ug=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ug=(209, 208.00, 99.5%)
cu=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
ug=(210, 209.04, 96.3%) ua=( 7, 6.97, 3.2%) cu=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
SSU 513,538 (SSUA)
2 cu=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) cu=(209, 208.00, 99.5%)
aa=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
cu=(209, 208.04, 95.9%) cg=( 8, 7.96, 3.7%) aa=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
SSU 585,756
(SSUA,RNA8) 2
ug=(206, 206.00, 99.0%) ua=( 2, 2.00, 1.0%)
ug=(207, 207.00, 99.0%) ua=( 2, 2.00, 1.0%)
ug=(207, 199.37, 95.4%) gu=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%) ua=( 2, 1.93, 0.9%)
SSU 772,807 (RNA8)
2
ug=(207, 207.00, 99.5%) ua=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
ug=(207, 207.00, 99.0%) ag=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%) ua=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
ug=(207, 199.37, 95.4%) gc=( 5, 0.18, 2.3%) gu=( 3, 0.11, 1.4%) ag=( 1, 0.96, 0.5%) ua=( 1, 0.96, 0.5%)
SSU 774,805 (RNA8)
2 ac=(208, 208.00, 100.0%) ac=(208, 208.00, 99.5%)
uc=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
ac=(208, 200.33, 95.9%) uu=( 8, 0.33, 3.7%) uc=( 1, 8.67, 0.5%)
SSU 778,804 (RNA8)
2 gc=(206, 206.00, 99.0%) gu=( 2, 2.00, 1.0%)
gc=(207, 207.00, 99.0%) gu=( 2, 2.00, 1.0%)
gc=(207, 199.37, 95.4%) ua=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%) gu=( 2, 1.93, 0.9%)
SSU 784,798 (RNA8)
2 ug=(201, 201.00, 96.6%) ua=( 7, 7.00, 3.4%)
ug=(201, 201.00, 96.2%) ua=( 8, 8.00, 3.8%)
ug=(201, 193.59, 92.6%) au=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%) ua=( 8, 7.71, 3.7%)
rRNAa Pairb (Fragmentsc)
Categoryd Hemosporidiane + Coccidianf + Piroplasmg
SSU 885,912 (SSUB)
2 gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(209, 209.00, 99.5%)
gu=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
gc=(209, 201.33, 95.9%) ua=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%) gu=( 1, 0.96, 0.5%)
SSU 894,905 (SSUB)
2 gu=(208, 208.00, 99.5%) gc=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
gu=(209, 209.00, 99.5%) gc=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
gu=(209, 201.33, 95.9%) ua=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%) gc=( 1, 0.96, 0.5%)
SSU 895,904 (SSUB)
2
ug=(207, 207.00, 99.0%) ua=( 2, 2.00, 1.0%)
ug=(208, 208.00, 99.0%) ua=( 2, 2.00, 1.0%)
ug=(208, 204.18, 95.4%) ua=( 5, 4.91, 2.3%) au=( 4, 0.09, 1.8%) uu=( 1, 4.91, 0.5%)
SSU 930,1387
(SSUB,SSUD) 2
cg=(208, 208.00, 99.5%) ug=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
cg=(208, 208.00, 99.0%) ug=( 2, 2.00, 1.0%)
cg=(208, 200.37, 95.4%) ua=( 8, 0.37, 3.7%) ug=( 2, 9.63, 0.9%)
SSU 931,1386
(SSUB,SSUD) 1
au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) au=(213, 208.11, 97.7%) gc=( 5, 0.11, 2.3%)
SSU 933,1384
(SSUB,SSUD) 1
ag=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ag=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) ag=(209, 201.29, 96.3%) ga=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
SSU 939,1344
(SSUB,SSUD) 2
gu=(208, 208.00, 99.5%) au=( 1, 1.00, 0.5%)
gu=(208, 208.00, 99.0%) au=( 2, 2.00, 1.0%)
gu=(208, 200.37, 95.4%) ua=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%) au=( 2, 1.93, 0.9%)
SSU 941,1342
(SSUB,SSUD) 1
gc=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) gc=(210, 202.29, 96.3%) au=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
SSU 962,973 (SSUB)
1 ua=(106, 53.76, 50.7%) cg=(103, 50.76, 49.3%)
ua=(106, 53.50, 50.5%) cg=(104, 51.50, 49.5%)
ua=(114, 59.61, 52.3%) cg=(104, 49.61, 47.7%)
SSU 986,1219
(SSUB,RNA9) 1
au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(209, 201.29, 96.3%) ga=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
SSU 989,1216
(SSUB,RNA9) 2
cg=(207, 205.02, 99.0%) au=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%) ua=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
cg=(207, 205.02, 99.0%) au=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%) ua=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
cg=(207, 197.46, 95.4%) aa=( 8, 0.37, 3.7%) au=( 1, 0.04, 0.5%) ua=( 1, 0.04, 0.5%)
rRNAa Pairb (Fragmentsc)
Categoryd Hemosporidiane + Coccidianf + Piroplasmg
SSU 1411,1489
(SSUE,SSUF) 1
cg=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 210.00, 100.0%) cg=(210, 202.29, 96.3%) ua=( 8, 0.29, 3.7%)
SSU 1514,1521
(SSUF) 1
au=(209, 209.00, 100.0%) au=(209, 208.00, 99.5%) gc=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
au=(217, 216.00, 99.5%) gc=( 1, 0.00, 0.5%)
a LSU, large subunit ribosomal RNA; SSU, small subunit ribosomal RNA. b Base pairs with significant potential covariation are shown. Pairs are named using the E. coli rRNA reference structure model numbering. c Fragment containing each position (not repeated if both positions are in the same fragment). d Category 1, strong covariation signal without exceptions (red in Figures S9-S11); 2, covariation signal with exceptions (blue in Figures S9-S11). e 200 sequences from Plasmodium and nine related hemosporidians, for a total of 209 sequences. f All sequences from the hemosporidian alignment, plus one coccidian sequence, for a total of 210 sequences. g All sequences from the hemosporidian and coccidian alignment, plus eight piroplasm sequences, for a total of 218 sequences. h Background shading: red, invariant; green, coccidian does not add information to hemosporidian; blue, piroplasm does not add information to coccidian. i Covariation data: <base pair type>=(<number of occurrences observed in dataset>, <number of occurrences expected based upon random distribution of
observed nucleotides at the two positions>, <percentage of sequences containing the base pair type>). j Text color: green, coccidian has that combination at that base pair (may overlap with hemosporidian); blue, at least one of the eight piroplasm sequences
has that combination at that base pair (may overlap with hemosporidian and/or coccidian).
Table S9. Correspondence of P. falciparum and C. elegans mt rRNAs.
SSU helixa P. falciparumb C. elegansb
9 missing present 17 missing present 27 RNA14:SSUA present 39 RNA14 present
122 RNA12 missing 240 RNA12 missing 289 RNA17 missing 500 SSUA present 505 SSUA present 511 SSUA present 567 SSUA:SSUB present 575 SSUA:SSUB present 577 SSUA:RNA8 present 655 missing present; short 673 missing present 722 missing present 769 RNA8 present 821 RNA8:SSUB missing 885 SSUB present 921 SSUB:SSUE present 939 SSUB:SSUD present 944 SSUB:RNA9 present 960 SSUB present 984 SSUB:RNA9 present
1047 RNA19:RNA9; short present 1068 missing present 1074 missing present 1303 SSUD:RNA5 present 1350 SSUD present
1399 SSUE:SSUF; short present; short 1506 SSUF present
5’ LSU helixa P. falciparumb C. elegansb
563 missing present 579 LSUA:RNA1 present 589 LSUA; short present; short 671 LSUA present 687 LSUA present 700 LSUA: short missing 736 LSUA present 777 LSUA present 812 LSUA present 822 LSUA missing 946 RNA2 missing 976 RNA2 missing 991 RNA2:RNA11 unstructured
1030 missing present, short 1057 LSUB present 1082 LSUB:LSUC missing 1087 LSUC present 1164 RNA11 missing 1196 RNA11:RNA1, short present; short 1262 RNA1:LSUE present 1276 RNA1 missing 1295 RNA1:RNA3 missing
a Helix numbers correspond to the first nt in the
corresponding helices in E. coli rRNA secondary
structures
3’LSU helixa P. falciparumb C. elegansb 1648 RNA3:LSUE missing 1764 LSUD:LSUE present 1775 LSUD present 1782 LSUD present 1792 LSUD present; short 1830 LSUD:LSUE present 1835 LSUD:LSUE; short present; short 1906 LSUE present 1925 LSUE present 1935 LSUE present 2023 LSUE present 2043 LSUE:LSUG present 2064 LSUE:LSUF present 2077 LSUE:RNA13 present 2246 RNA13 present 2455 LSUF present 2507 LSUF:LSUG present 2520 LSUF:LSUG present 2547 LSUG present 2588 LSUG present 2646 RNA10 present 2675 RNA10/RNA18:RNA6 present; short 2735 RNA6 present
b Significant differences between P. falciparum
and C. elegans rRNA structure (absence or
altered size) are in bold italic font
Recommended