Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

Preview:

Citation preview

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Understanding Resilience through a Musical AnalogyRamon Gilsanz, PE, SE, FSEI

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

A Musical Analogy

Earthquake ↔ Music

Soil ↔ Musician

Seismic Spectrum ↔ Score

Building ↔ Instrument

Bldg. Response ↔ Melody

Occupants ↔ Audience

Social Context ↔ Concert Hall

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil

Magnitude

Acceleration

Shaking Duration

Frequency

Musician

Dynamics (Loudness)

Tempo (Speed)

Time (Length of Piece)

Musical Pitch

Soil-Musician

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil-MusicianTypes of Waves

Bolt, B. (1993) “Earthquakes and Geological Discovery”

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil-MusicianTypes of Waves

Atkinson Physics (YouTube)

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

• Density (Granite): 156-168 lbs/sf3

• P-Waves: 19,700 ft/s• S-Waves: 10,800 ft/s

Soil-Musician Solid Rock

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

• Density: 94 lbs/sf3

• P-Waves: 1,310 ft/s• S-Waves: 330 ft/s

Soil-Musician Sand

Rachel Barton Pine

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil-Musician

esmes.com

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil-Musician Liquefaction

Christchurch, New Zealand, 2011

nzraw.co.nz

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil-Musician Liquefaction

Assam, India, 1897

Oldham, R.D. “Report on the great earthquake of 1897”

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil-Musician Clay and Silt

Indiana University Southeast

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil-Musician

John Hacket (pintrest)

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil-Musician Clay and Silt

Bolt, B. (1993)

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

• Measure of energy an earthquake releases

• An increase in magnitudeof 1 is a 32-fold increasein energy released

• Seismic Moment = (Strength of soil) x (Rupture area) x (Fault displacement)

(Adopted by USGS in 2002)

Soil-MusicianMagnitude

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

• Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA)– Maximum acceleration experienced by

a particle at ground level

• Peak Floor Acceleration (PFA)– Maximum acceleration experienced at

a floor level

Soil-MusicianAccelerations

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Seismic Spectrum - Score

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Seismic Spectrum - Score

Adapted from Bolt, B. (1993)

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-InstrumentFrequency

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-Instrument

emporis.com

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-InstrumentResonance

Missouri S&T, Prof. O. Kwon (YouTube)

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Role of the Engineer

• Static Analysis

• Response Spectrum

• Non-linear / Time History(measures duration)

Building-InstrumentWays to Design

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Approximate acceleration experienced by a building, when modeled as a particle on a vertical mass-less rod, with an identical period as the building

Building-InstrumentWays to DesignAcceleration

T

F ~ m x SA

GMS

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-InstrumentWays to DesignAcceleration

PERIOD

SA

T

AC

CEL

ERA

TIO

N

SDS

SD1

PGA

GMS

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

NEHRP SDS SD1

2003 0.24 0.0472000 0.28 0.0631997 0.28 0.063

Design accelerations for

Zip Code: 10016Assuming Site Class B

RockStandard Steel building

Ordinary moment frame

Ie =1R = 3.5Ts = 0.195 seconds

Building-InstrumentWays to DesignAcceleration

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

• Approach: Redundant shear wall construction

• Goal: Immediate occupancy

• Downside: High non-structural damage, architectural constraints

Building-InstrumentDesign Approach:Chile

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-Instrument Design Approach:Chile

FEMA-350 (2000)

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-Instrument Design Approach:Japan

• Approach: Base isolation

• Goal: Immediate occupancy & minimal damage

• Downside: High cost

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-Instrument Design Approach:Japan

Photos: GMS

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-InstrumentDesign Approach:Japan

Shimizu Corporation

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-Instrument Design Approach:United States

• Approach: Energy dissipation through plastic deformations of the structure

• Goal: Cost effective life safety

• Downside: Significant damage to building

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-Instrument Design Approach:United States

Photo: GMS

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-Instrument Plastic Hinge

FEMA-350 (2000)

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-Instrument Plastic Hinge

FEMA-350 (2000)

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Occupants- Audience

Modified Mercalli Earthquake Intensity Scale

imgur.com

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Collapse

Unusable

Usable

Source: CATDAT Damaging Earthquakes Database (via earthquake-report.com)

Building Damage

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Context-Concert Hall

South African National Youth Orchestra

Chrisian Mehlfurer

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

U.S. Approach

Protects the individual…

• 0.5% of all crashes are fatal• 1.07 fatalities per 100 mil VMT

(US DOT NHTSA)

…but cripples the system (city)

(US DOT FHWA)

Bottle-necks

25%Collisions

Badweather

Workzones

Poor SignalOther

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Context-Concert HallLisbon, 1755

Bettman Archives

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Context-Concert HallLisbon, 1755

Voltaire Rousseau

Nature is so cruel…Look at this

devastation in Lisbon!

Nature did not construct twenty thousand houses of six to seven stories there!

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Context-Concert HallSan Francisco, 1906

Wikimedia Commons

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Context-Concert HallSan Francisco, 1906

Over 3,000 deathsTotal damage ~ $350 million

Estimates of % damage due to earthquake:3% - Colonel Francis W. Fitzpatrick, ISBC, 1906.

About 4% - Horace D. Dunn, engineer, 1906.3 to 10% - Architect and Engineer, 1907.

Less than 5% - A.M. Hunt, insurance adjuster, 1925.20% - Professor Karl Steinbrugge, University of CA, 1982.

5% - Professor Stephen Tobriner, University of CA.

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Great Kantō earthquake struck Tokyo at 11:58:44 a.m September 1, 1923

Because the earthquake struck at lunchtime when many people were cooking meals over fire, many people died as a result of the many large fires that broke out

3 hour

6 hour 12 hour

Building Damage

3 hour

Courtesy of Michigan State University

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Context-Concert HallAdditional Effects

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

• How many instruments must breakbefore a performance gets canceled?

• How important are those instruments?

• Not only individual buildings, but the entire neighborhood must be resilient.

• It is important that the neighbor remains standing

Context-Concert Hall

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

• The most vulnerable elements of the cityare most in need of protection.

• 9/11 attack– Economically strong neighborhood– Newer construction– Localized damage– City is not paralyzed

• Hurricane Sandy– Economically weak neighborhoods– Older construction– Widespread damage– More difficult to respond

Context-Concert Hall

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Credits

Staring

Ramon Gilsanz

Supporting Roles

Verónica CedillosDan EschanasyAyse HortacsuSissy Nikolaou

Len Joseph

Produced by

Petr Vancura

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Thank youGilsanz Murray SteficekEngineers and Architects