47
2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy Ramon Gilsanz, PE, SE, FSEI

Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Understanding Resilience through a Musical AnalogyRamon Gilsanz, PE, SE, FSEI

Page 2: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

A Musical Analogy

Earthquake ↔ Music

Soil ↔ Musician

Seismic Spectrum ↔ Score

Building ↔ Instrument

Bldg. Response ↔ Melody

Occupants ↔ Audience

Social Context ↔ Concert Hall

Page 3: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil

Magnitude

Acceleration

Shaking Duration

Frequency

Musician

Dynamics (Loudness)

Tempo (Speed)

Time (Length of Piece)

Musical Pitch

Soil-Musician

Page 4: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil-MusicianTypes of Waves

Bolt, B. (1993) “Earthquakes and Geological Discovery”

Page 5: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil-MusicianTypes of Waves

Atkinson Physics (YouTube)

Page 6: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

• Density (Granite): 156-168 lbs/sf3

• P-Waves: 19,700 ft/s• S-Waves: 10,800 ft/s

Soil-Musician Solid Rock

Page 7: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

• Density: 94 lbs/sf3

• P-Waves: 1,310 ft/s• S-Waves: 330 ft/s

Soil-Musician Sand

Rachel Barton Pine

Page 8: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil-Musician

esmes.com

Page 9: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil-Musician Liquefaction

Christchurch, New Zealand, 2011

nzraw.co.nz

Page 10: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil-Musician Liquefaction

Assam, India, 1897

Oldham, R.D. “Report on the great earthquake of 1897”

Page 11: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil-Musician Clay and Silt

Indiana University Southeast

Page 12: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil-Musician

John Hacket (pintrest)

Page 13: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Soil-Musician Clay and Silt

Bolt, B. (1993)

Page 14: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

• Measure of energy an earthquake releases

• An increase in magnitudeof 1 is a 32-fold increasein energy released

• Seismic Moment = (Strength of soil) x (Rupture area) x (Fault displacement)

(Adopted by USGS in 2002)

Soil-MusicianMagnitude

Page 15: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

• Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA)– Maximum acceleration experienced by

a particle at ground level

• Peak Floor Acceleration (PFA)– Maximum acceleration experienced at

a floor level

Soil-MusicianAccelerations

Page 16: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Seismic Spectrum - Score

Page 17: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Seismic Spectrum - Score

Adapted from Bolt, B. (1993)

Page 18: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-InstrumentFrequency

Page 19: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-Instrument

emporis.com

Page 20: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-InstrumentResonance

Missouri S&T, Prof. O. Kwon (YouTube)

Page 21: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Role of the Engineer

• Static Analysis

• Response Spectrum

• Non-linear / Time History(measures duration)

Building-InstrumentWays to Design

Page 22: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Approximate acceleration experienced by a building, when modeled as a particle on a vertical mass-less rod, with an identical period as the building

Building-InstrumentWays to DesignAcceleration

T

F ~ m x SA

GMS

Page 23: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-InstrumentWays to DesignAcceleration

PERIOD

SA

T

AC

CEL

ERA

TIO

N

SDS

SD1

PGA

GMS

Page 24: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

NEHRP SDS SD1

2003 0.24 0.0472000 0.28 0.0631997 0.28 0.063

Design accelerations for

Zip Code: 10016Assuming Site Class B

RockStandard Steel building

Ordinary moment frame

Ie =1R = 3.5Ts = 0.195 seconds

Building-InstrumentWays to DesignAcceleration

Page 25: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

• Approach: Redundant shear wall construction

• Goal: Immediate occupancy

• Downside: High non-structural damage, architectural constraints

Building-InstrumentDesign Approach:Chile

Page 26: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-Instrument Design Approach:Chile

FEMA-350 (2000)

Page 27: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-Instrument Design Approach:Japan

• Approach: Base isolation

• Goal: Immediate occupancy & minimal damage

• Downside: High cost

Page 28: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-Instrument Design Approach:Japan

Photos: GMS

Page 29: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-InstrumentDesign Approach:Japan

Shimizu Corporation

Page 30: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-Instrument Design Approach:United States

• Approach: Energy dissipation through plastic deformations of the structure

• Goal: Cost effective life safety

• Downside: Significant damage to building

Page 31: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-Instrument Design Approach:United States

Photo: GMS

Page 32: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-Instrument Plastic Hinge

FEMA-350 (2000)

Page 33: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Building-Instrument Plastic Hinge

FEMA-350 (2000)

Page 34: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Occupants- Audience

Modified Mercalli Earthquake Intensity Scale

imgur.com

Page 35: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Collapse

Unusable

Usable

Source: CATDAT Damaging Earthquakes Database (via earthquake-report.com)

Building Damage

Page 36: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Context-Concert Hall

South African National Youth Orchestra

Chrisian Mehlfurer

Page 37: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

U.S. Approach

Protects the individual…

• 0.5% of all crashes are fatal• 1.07 fatalities per 100 mil VMT

(US DOT NHTSA)

…but cripples the system (city)

(US DOT FHWA)

Bottle-necks

25%Collisions

Badweather

Workzones

Poor SignalOther

Page 38: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Context-Concert HallLisbon, 1755

Bettman Archives

Page 39: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Context-Concert HallLisbon, 1755

Voltaire Rousseau

Nature is so cruel…Look at this

devastation in Lisbon!

Nature did not construct twenty thousand houses of six to seven stories there!

Page 40: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Context-Concert HallSan Francisco, 1906

Wikimedia Commons

Page 41: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Context-Concert HallSan Francisco, 1906

Over 3,000 deathsTotal damage ~ $350 million

Estimates of % damage due to earthquake:3% - Colonel Francis W. Fitzpatrick, ISBC, 1906.

About 4% - Horace D. Dunn, engineer, 1906.3 to 10% - Architect and Engineer, 1907.

Less than 5% - A.M. Hunt, insurance adjuster, 1925.20% - Professor Karl Steinbrugge, University of CA, 1982.

5% - Professor Stephen Tobriner, University of CA.

Page 42: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Great Kantō earthquake struck Tokyo at 11:58:44 a.m September 1, 1923

Because the earthquake struck at lunchtime when many people were cooking meals over fire, many people died as a result of the many large fires that broke out

3 hour

6 hour 12 hour

Building Damage

3 hour

Courtesy of Michigan State University

Page 43: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Context-Concert HallAdditional Effects

Page 44: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

• How many instruments must breakbefore a performance gets canceled?

• How important are those instruments?

• Not only individual buildings, but the entire neighborhood must be resilient.

• It is important that the neighbor remains standing

Context-Concert Hall

Page 45: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

• The most vulnerable elements of the cityare most in need of protection.

• 9/11 attack– Economically strong neighborhood– Newer construction– Localized damage– City is not paralyzed

• Hurricane Sandy– Economically weak neighborhoods– Older construction– Widespread damage– More difficult to respond

Context-Concert Hall

Page 46: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Credits

Staring

Ramon Gilsanz

Supporting Roles

Verónica CedillosDan EschanasyAyse HortacsuSissy Nikolaou

Len Joseph

Produced by

Petr Vancura

Page 47: Understanding Resilience through a Musical Analogy

2016 International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure

Thank youGilsanz Murray SteficekEngineers and Architects