Free Cooling: A Complete Solution on Reducing Total Energy Consumption for Telecommunication Base...

Preview:

Citation preview

Powering the Software Defined Network

Free Cooling: A Complete Solution on Reducing Total Energy Consumption for

Telecommunication Base Stations

Ehsan B. Haghighi

ehsanbh1@gmail.comThermal Designer

– 2 –

Contents

• Introduction

• Free Cooling

• Energy and Controlling Model

• System Components and Operation

• Single and Dual Zone Strategies

• Case Studies and Results

• Conclusion

– 3 –

– 4 –

– 5 –

– 6 –

Introduction

• Cooling traditionally counted for 25-50% of the total energy consumption in a typical base station.

– 7 –

Free Cooling

Extracting fresh air into the shelter

– 8 –

Source: https://www.dantherm.com/

– 9 –

Facebook data centre in Luleå, Sweden

– 10 –

Energy Model

INFSOLENVITCOOL QQQQQ

– 11 –

Controlling Model

if TSET <= TO+ΔTlag=> Air Conditioning if TSET > TO+ΔTlag => Free Cooling

– 12 –

System Components

– 13 –

System Operation

Free cooling Air conditioning

– 14 –

Single and Dual Zone Strategies

Single zone strategy Dual zone strategy

– 15 –

Case Studies• A typical BTS with L=4 m, W=3 m, and H=2.8 m• QIT = 4 kW and QBattery = 0.4 kW (on average)• UEnv = 1 W/m2K and UBattery = 0.5 W/m2K• ΔTlag = 2 °C• Tset = 25 °C for the single zone strategy • Tset = 25 °C (battery compartment) and Tset = 35 °C (IT/electronic) for

the dual zone strategy• COP = 2.5 and idle fan power consumption for the main air

conditioning system are assumed to 100 W• The power consumption for the free cooling unit is assumed to be

80 W on average• In the dual zone strategy a small air conditioning unit with COP of

2.4 and 75% running time is used to provide the required cooling load for the smaller zone

• The area for the smaller zone is assumed to be 10% of the area of the main zone

– 16 –

Locations

• Copenhagen (Denmark), San Francisco (USA), Shanghai (China) and Dubai (UAE)• Weather data: ASHRAE handbook

– 17 –

Copenhagen, Denmark

– 18 –

San Francisco, USA

– 19 –

Shanghai, China

– 20 –

Dubai, UAE

– 21 –

Results

Cooling System Size (kW)

AC FC

Copenhagen, Denmark 5.0 4.9

San Francisco, USA 4.9 4.9

Shanghai, China 5.5 4.9

Dubai, UAE 6.0 4.8

– 22 –

Copenhagen, Denmark

– 23 –

San Francisco, USA

– 24 –

Shanghai, China

– 25 –

Dubai, UAE

– 26 –

Results

Savings (%)

Single Zone Dual Zone

Copenhagen, Denmark

91 85

San Francisco, USA 94 86

Shanghai, China 53 85

Dubai, UAE 21 68

– 27 –

Conclusion

• Free cooling is a well-proven method to reduce total energy consumption in a typical BTS

• Free cooling can be used in either single or dual zone strategies

• In hot and warm climate zones dual zone strategy is recommended

Recommended