The Right Questions and Graphical Displays

Preview:

Citation preview

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 1

THE RIGHT QUESTIONS AND GRAPHICAL DISPLAYS

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 22

AGENDA OBJECTIVES

Agenda and Objectives

• Descriptive statistics• Dispersion• Aggregate data• The right questions and graphics• Data inference

Compare basic descriptive statistics and identify their limitations

Describe common mistakes associated with analyzing "on average" data

Explain the purpose of the Data Narrative analyses

Evaluate research questions against criteria for quality

2 2

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 33

In the last activity, we realized our need for disaggregating the data.

In the Data Narrative, we’ll perform two separate disaggregate analyses,

guided by research questions that we pose of the data.

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 4

How Does This Relate To The Data Narrative?

This is in your

Handout

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 55

In the Data Narrative, we’ll perform two separate disaggregate analyses,

guided by research questions that we pose of the data.

Let’s step back and think about research questions that are being

asked of other data.

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 6

Research Questions to be “Consumed”

Did people who switched from Geico to 21st Century Insurance save money on

their car insurance premiums?

This is in your

Handout

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 7

Research Questions to be “Consumed”

Did people who switched from Geico to 21st Century Insurance save money on

their car insurance premiums? Were smokers who used

Chantix more likely to be quit on weeks 9 through 12 than smokers who took the

sugar pill?

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 8

Research Questions to be “Consumed”

Did people who switched from Geico to 21st Century Insurance save money on

their car insurance premiums? Were smokers who used

Chantix more likely to be quit on weeks 9 through 12 than smokers who took the

sugar pill?

What’s the

answer? Let’s find

out!

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 9

On The Next Slide, Click “Play” On The Screen

Did people who switched from Geico to 21st Century Insurance save money on their car insurance premiums?

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 10

On The Next Slide, Click “Play” On The Screen

Do smokers who use Chantix have a higher probability of being quit on weeks 9 through 12 than users who took the sugar pill?

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 1111

“There is no such thing as a stupid question…

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 1212

“There is no such thing as a stupid question…

Actually, yes there is.”

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 13

What is Wrong With These Questions?

Did people who switched from Geico to 21st Century Insurance save money on

their car insurance premiums?

Were smokers who used Chantix more likely to be

quit on weeks 9 through 12 than smokers who took the

sugar pill?

Click ahead when you’ve completed the appropriate section

of your Handout

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 15

What is Wrong With These Questions?

Did people who switched from Geico to 21st Century Insurance save money on

their car insurance premiums?

SAMPLE BIAS

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 16

What is Wrong With These Questions?

Did people who switched from Geico to 21st Century Insurance save money on

their car insurance premiums?

SAMPLE BIAS

This question is laden with sample bias. It’s only asking about people who switched. Why did people switch from Geico in the first place? Probably because they could save money.

The question didn't say, "for the average person, when shopping for car insurance, was Geico or Century 21 cheaper?"

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 17

What is Wrong With These Questions?

Did people who switched from Geico to 21st Century Insurance save money on

their car insurance premiums?

SAMPLE BIAS

This question is laden with sample bias. It’s only asking about people who switched. Why did people switch from Geico in the first place? Probably because they could save money.

The question didn't say, "for the average person, when shopping for car insurance, was Geico or Century 21 cheaper?"

This is a stupid question. It’s like

asking,

“Do students who attend after-school tutoring do worse than students who never needed to attend tutoring?”

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 18

What is Wrong With These Questions?

Were smokers who used Chantix more likely to be

quit on weeks 9 through 12 than smokers who took the

sugar pill?

LEADING QUESTION

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 19

What is Wrong With These Questions?

Were smokers who used Chantix more likely to be

quit on weeks 9 through 12 than smokers who took the

sugar pill?

LEADING QUESTION

This is a leading question. They stacked the deck. Why weeks 9 to 12? Why not weeks 6 through 10? More than likely, they retroactively imposed the question when they noticed

that the results were favorable to their position.

The question didn't say, ”in a comparison using a randomized controlled trial, did people who used Chantix quit smoking and stay stopped more than the sugar pill, including people who didn’t quit at all, people who quit and started up again, people who dropped out of the

study, people who quit, started up again, stopped again, and kept going, etc. etc.?"

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 20

What is Wrong With These Questions?

Were smokers who used Chantix more likely to be

quit on weeks 9 through 12 than smokers who took the

sugar pill?

LEADING QUESTION

This is a leading question. They stacked the deck. Why weeks 9 to 12? Why not weeks 6 through 10? More than likely, they retroactively imposed the question when they noticed

that the results were favorable to their position.

The question didn't say, ”in a comparison using a randomized controlled trial, did people who used Chantix quit smoking and stay stopped more than the sugar pill, including people who didn’t quit at all, people who quit and started up again, people who dropped out of the

study, people who quit, started up again, stopped again, and kept going, etc. etc.?"

This is a stupid question. It’s like studying your data, noticing some unexpected trend, then

asking a research question about that unexpected trend, already knowing the answer.

The rubric for the Data Narrative does not ask you to disaggregate your data in a way to make you look good. Your research question should

meet its capacity to surprise.

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 21

What Makes a Great Research Question?

https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7116/7453374794_0bab20ec4c_h.jpghttps://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/15/Red_Apple.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3a/College_graduate_students.jpg

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 22

Minable: Can this Question be Thoroughly Explored?

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 23

Did my ELLs in 2nd hour improve on spiraled MC questions from IA #2 to IA #3?

Minable: Can this Question be Thoroughly Explored?

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 24

Did my ELLs in 2nd hour improve on spiraled MC questions from IA #2 to IA #3? Not minable.

We don’t want a yes/no question.

Plus it’s too narrow. Only ELLs, only

spiraled MC questions, only IA

#2 vs. IA #3.

Minable: Can this Question be Thoroughly Explored?

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 25

Minable: Can this Question be Thoroughly Explored?

How did my students’ performance on spiraled standards vary from assessment to assessment?

Now this is a minable question!

Notice it starts with “How did” not “Did”

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 26

Crisp: Is it Succinct and Easy to Understand?

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 27

Crisp: Is it Succinct and Easy to Understand?

How did boys perform versus girls, overall, across reading and math, relative to question type MC vs OR, and with respect to the different assessments that I administered for my Pathway, including unit and interim?

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 28

How did boys perform versus girls, overall, across reading and math, relative to question type MC vs OR, and with respect to the different assessments that I administered for my Pathway, including unit and interim?

Not succinct.

We’re not sure what the question is

asking.

Crisp: Is it Succinct and Easy to Understand?

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 29

Crisp: Is it Succinct and Easy to Understand?

What, if any, were the achievement differences between boys and girls in my class?

Now this is a succinct question!

Notice that the question doesn’t lead…it doesn’t

assume to know the answer already

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 30

Meaningful: Is There Rationale for Why I Should Care?

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 31

Were the trends in academic performance any different for students who preferred for Ruffles potato chips over Lays in our “Harvest Fair Taste Test”?

Meaningful: Is There Rationale for Why I Should Care?

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 32

Were the trends in academic performance any different for students who preferred for Ruffles potato chips over Lays in our “Harvest Fair Taste Test”?

Not meaningful.

It’s difficult to imagine a rationale for why we should

care about the answer. We don’t

care. We don’t want to know the answer.

Meaningful: Is There Rationale for Why I Should Care?

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 33

Meaningful: Is There Rationale for Why I Should Care?

How did my students’ performance vary for those in both my class and also in my advisory, versus those who were only in my class?

Now this is a meaningful question! We can envision a solid

rationale for why we should care about

performance of students who spent more or less time with the teacher

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 3434

Research Question Matchup

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 35

Research Question Matchup!

Q1: Did basketball players score higher than actors on standard 6.1.d?

35

Q2:What (if any) differences in achievement existed between athletes and entertainers for math standards mastery?

Click ahead when you’ve completed the appropriate section

of your Handout

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 37

Q1: Did basketball players score higher than actors on standard 6.1.d?

37

Q2:What (if any) differences in achievement existed between athletes and entertainers for math standards mastery?

Research Question Matchup!

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 38

Q2 is minable.

Q1 is not. Q1 is a narrow, yes/no question. NOT minable.

Q2 wins the matchup!

38

Q2:What (if any) differences in achievement existed between athletes and entertainers for math standards mastery?

Research Question Matchup!

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 39

Q1: What, if any, variation of achievement existed between people who use a nickname (like “Bill” Clinton, “Steffi” Graf, or “Tony” Blair) and those who didn’t (like “Michael” Bloomberg)?

39

Q2:What, if any, variation of achievement existed between people who had initials early in the alphabet (like “Bill Clinton” or “Andrew Cuomo”) and those who didn’t (like “Serena Wiliams”or “Justin Timberlake”)?

Research Question Matchup!

Click ahead when you’ve completed the appropriate section

of your Handout

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 41

Q1: What, if any, variation of achievement existed between people who use a nickname (like “Bill” Clinton, “Steffi” Graf, or “Tony” Blair) and those who didn’t (like “Michael” Bloomberg)?

41

Q2:What, if any, variation of achievement existed between people who had initials early in the alphabet (like “Bill Clinton” or “Andrew Cuomo”) and those who didn’t (like “Serena Wiliams”or “Justin Timberlake”)?

Research Question Matchup!

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 4242

Q2:What, if any, variation of achievement existed between people who had initials early in the alphabet (like “Bill Clinton” or “Andrew Cuomo”) and those who didn’t (like “Serena Wiliams”or “Justin Timberlake”)?

This is a tough matchup.

Both questions seem meaningless.

HOWEVER, there is some research to suggest that people with names earlier in the alphabet are more successful in life because they are placed first in line more often, over time. So you could write a compelling rationale that makes Q2 meaningful to the reader of your Data Narrative. It better be compelling though.

So Q2 wins the matchup!

Research Question Matchup!

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 43

Q1:Why did some students meet the Proficient Goal (for math Standards Mastery) while some didn’t?

43

Q2:For my students who did not meet the Proficient Goal (for math Standards Mastery), were there any commonalities in the content that they struggled to master?

Research Question Matchup!

Click ahead when you’ve completed the appropriate section

of your Handout

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 45

Q1:Why did some students meet the Proficient Goal (for math Standards Mastery) while some didn’t?

45

Q2:For my students who did not meet the Proficient Goal (for math Standards Mastery), were there any commonalities in the content that they struggled to master?

Research Question Matchup!

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 4646

Q2:For my students who did not meet the Proficient Goal (for math Standards Mastery), were there any commonalities in the content that they struggled to master?

Q1 is an interesting question, but we don’t have the data we need to answer broad “why” questions. This is a question better-suited for earning your PhD than for writing your Data Narrative.

For Q2 you have the opportunity to find commonalities like standards or question types that these students struggled with the most.

So Q2 wins the matchup!

Research Question Matchup!

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 47

Research Questions: Your Turn!Take a moment to jot down your ideas.

47

Click ahead when you’ve completed the appropriate section

of your Handout

49

In the Data Narrative, we’ll perform two separate disaggregate analyses,

guided by research questions that we pose of the data.

We’ll also create graphical displays to visualize the findings in response to

the research questions.

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 5050

“Figures don't lie…

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 5151

“Figures don't lie…

but liars figure.”

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 52

What Could be Improved About this Display?

52

The bar graphs below display students’ overall math Standards Mastery, comparing boys versus girls for Class #1.

Click ahead when you’ve completed the appropriate section

of your Handout

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 54

What Could be Improved About this Display?

54

Titles!

The bar graphs below display students’ overall math Standards Mastery, comparing boys versus girls for Class #1.

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 5555

Unify!

The bar graphs below display students’ overall math Standards Mastery, comparing boys versus girls for Class #1.

What Could be Improved About this Display?

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 5656

Axes Labels!

The bar graphs below display students’ overall math Standards Mastery, comparing boys versus girls for Class #1.

What Could be Improved About this Display?

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 5757

Axes Scaling!

The bar graphs below display students’ overall math Standards Mastery, comparing boys versus girls for Class #1.

What Could be Improved About this Display?

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 58

What is Better About this Display?

58

CS CT RL SG LL S LJ AC MB SW0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Overall Standards Mastery, Boys vs. Girls

BoysGirls

Individuals

Scor

e

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 59

What is Better About this Display?

59

How else could we display this data? Ideas?

CS CT RL SG LL S LJ AC MB SW0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Overall Standards Mastery, Boys vs. Girls

BoysGirls

Individuals

Scor

e

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 60

What Information did we Lose by Aggregating?

60

Boys Girls0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Avg = 41.5

Avg = 62.75

Avg Standards Mastery, Boys vs. Girls

Avg

Scor

e

n = 6n = 4

Click ahead when you’ve completed the appropriate section

of your Handout

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 62

What Information did we Lose by Aggregating?

62

Boys Girls0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Avg = 41.5

Avg = 62.75

Avg Standards Mastery, Boys vs. Girls

Avg

Scor

e

n = 6n = 4

We can’t see the spread

(dispersion) of scores within those buckets

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 63

How Can We Make This Even Better?

63

CS CT RL LJ AC MB SG LL S SW0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Overall Standards Mastery, Boys vs. Girls

BoysGirls

Individuals

Scor

e

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 64

CS CT RL SG LL S LJ AC MB SW0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Overall Standards Mastery, Boys vs. Girls

BoysGirls

Individuals

Scor

eA Super Rich Graphic: Four Dimensions!(super rich, get it?)

64

70% - Achieve Fl.80% - Amb. Goal

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 65

CS CT RL SG LL S LJ AC MB SW0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Overall Standards Mastery, Boys vs. Girls

BoysGirls

Individuals

Scor

eA Super Rich Graphic: Four Dimensions!

65

70% - Prof. Goal80% - Amb. Goal

© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 6666

Hope you’re impressed.McKayla Maroney.

55% Standards Mastery.

Class #2.

Recommended