Maligoy na Pagpapahayag progress report

Construct Validation of the Panukat ng Maligoy na Pagpapahayag (PMP)

Beltran, Ma. AngelicaGalac, Vernely M.

Jimenez, Tammy M.Villanueva, Rozette Fae E.

PROPOSAL: Participants and Setting•No need for Pre-test

-Initial reliability results were obtained in the Psychological Assessment class (K-R 20= .805)

RELIABILITY TEST• Participants

- 120 male and female Filipino college students - Convenience sampling with a certain criteria

- Proficient in both Filipino and English language• Setting

– Colleges and universities

VALIDITY TEST• New set of participants will be used but the same selection criteria and

procedure will be observed

ACTUAL: Participants and Setting

PRACTICE SURVEY• Participants– 28 General Psychology students–Mixed course and year levels

• Setting–Audio-Visual Room in Miriam College

• It was conducted to test the instructions and procedures

ACTUAL: Participants and Setting

RELIABILITY TEST• Participants– 215 Filipino college students– Proficient in both Filipino and English language

• Setting– University of Santo Tomas• College of Architecture (2 first-year classes and 3 third-

year classes)• College of Education (1 first-year class)

University of Sto. TomasCollege of Architecture

University of Sto. TomasCollege of Architecture

University of Sto. TomasCollege of Education

ACTUAL: Participants and Setting

VALIDITY TEST• A second reliability test was conducted using the

same data for the validity test• Participants– 220 Filipino college students– Proficient in both Filipino and English language

• Setting– Polytechnic University of the Philippines• College of Engineering (1 second-year class and 1

third-year class)

ACTUAL: Participants and Setting

– Technological Institute of the Philippines• College of Architecture (2 first-year classes)

– Far Eastern University• College of Architecture (1 first-year class)

– AMA Computer Learning Center• Mixed year levels

– University of Santo Tomas• College of Fine Arts and Design (1 third-year class)

Polytechnic University of the PhilippinesCollege of Engineering

Polytechnic University of the PhilippinesCollege of Engineering

Technological Institute of the PhilippinesCollege of Architecture

Technological Institute of the PhilippinesCollege of Architecture

Far Eastern UniversityCollege of Architecture

University of Sto. TomasCollege of Fine Arts and Design

INSTRUMENTS: Results of Practice Survey (Quantitative)

Instrument N Reliability Coefficient

Panukat ng Maligoy na Pagpapahayag (PMP)

28 .864

Panukat ng Pagpapahiwatig (PP) 28 .897

Conversational Indirectness Scale (CIS) 28 .754

Simple Rathus Assertiveness Schedule (SRAS)

28 .697

INSTRUMENTS• REVISIONS– Instructions were modified– Items were deleted from the Panukat ng Maligoy na

Pagpapahayag (PMP) • From 49 items to 43 items

– Changes in demographic profile• Removed nationality – only Filipino college

students• Included name for tracking and validity

INSTRUMENTS: Reliability ResultsInstrument N Reliability Coefficient

Panukat ng Maligoy na Pagpapahayag (PMP)

215 .785

Panukat ng Pagpapahiwatig (PP) 215 .871

Conversational Indirectness Scale (CIS) 215 .720

Simple Rathus Assertiveness Schedule (SRAS)

215 .788

DATA GATHERING

• Practice survey results in terms of procedure– Average time of test administration• 1hour and 20 minutes

– Lack of general instructions– Offer two modes of instructions• Filipino and English

DATA GATHERING

• Revisions in procedure – Added specific instructions• About classroom decorum

– Offered two mode of instructions• Filipino or English

– For validity: Continuous test administration for each participant• No need to wait for the entire class to finish answering

the scale

REFLECTIONS

“Cooperation is really the key for a group to reach its goal. I've seen that each one of us had been cooperative during the whole data gathering that's why we finished on time. I've also learned to be more patient and prepared during our actual testing in different schools--we had to be patient because we are in their territory, and prepared because we don't know what type of people we'll be interacting with.” – Laicka Beltran

REFLECTIONS

“ Going to different places and schools has made me appreciate Katipunan and Miriam College even more. Being madiskarte and having no inhibition on commuting, we were able to survive the not-so-safe, busy streets of Manila. Our flexibility and patience helped us deal with different people. No matter how tired we are or when we catch students who don’t take the test seriously, we always have to look nice and sound approachable.” - Vern Galac

REFLECTIONS

“ Our data gathering pushed our physical and emotional strengths. Each of us combated physical exhaustion as we try to juggle our other subjects and administer to different schools at the same time. There were days when we felt like we were about to fail but we managed to survive because we supported each other. ” – Tammy Jimenez

REFLECTIONS

“ When you go out of your comfort zone, you will encounter a lot of characters. Some may be kind enough to help you out while others will really try your patience. You should not let your emotions get the better of you when you are faced in a difficult situation.” – Fae Villanueva

REVISED TIMELINE

• August 5 – Last day of scoring and encoding• August 6 – Computation of 2nd reliability and

validity results – Send results to Dr. Baybay and Dr. Evangelista

• August 7 – Meet Dr. Evangelista to discuss the results - Start writing Chapter III

REVISED TIMELINE

• August 9-13 – Send Chapter III to Dr. Baybay and revise• August 14 – Finalize Chapter III and send to Dr.

Evangelista• August 15 – Submit Chapter III• August 16 – Start Chapter IV• August 18-25 - Send Chapter IV to Dr. Baybay

REVISED TIMELINE

• August 25-31 – Revise based on Dr. Baybay’s comments• September 1 – Submit Chapter IV to Dr. Evangelista • Sept 2 – 8 – Revise based on Dr. Evangelista’s comments• Sept 9 – 11 – Revise according to Dr. Baybay’s comments

REVISED TIMELINE

• Sept 12 – 14 – Send to Dr. Evangelista and revise according to her comments• Sept 15– Submit Chapter IV• Sept 17- Start Chapter V• Sept 18-21 -Send Chapter V to Dr. Baybay and revise based on her comments

REVISED TIMELINE

• Sept 22– 25– Send to Dr. Evangelista and revise according to her comments• Sept 29– Submit Chapter V• October 5 – Compilation of chapters• Oct 8 – 12 – Preparation for defense• Oct 17 - Defense

Revision of Chapters 1 and 2 while waiting for Chapters 3 to 5 to be approved.