Feminist Critiques of Science

Preview:

Citation preview

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Merton’s four norms of science:

Merton’s four norms of science:•Universalism•Communism•Disinterestedness•Organized skepticism

•Universalism•Communism•Disinterestedness•Organized skepticism

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Does exclusion of women

result in bad science?

Does exclusion of women

result in bad science?

Feminism:Feminism:

Commitment to examine and

address unequal treatment of the

sexes.

Commitment to examine and

address unequal treatment of the

sexes.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Feminist critique of science:Feminist critique of science:

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Feminist critique of science:Feminist critique of science:

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

•Examine inequalities in who gets to do science.

•Examine inequalities in who gets to do science.

Feminist critique of science:Feminist critique of science:

•Examine inequalities in who gets to do science.

•Examine theories that support unequal treatment of the sexes.

•Examine inequalities in who gets to do science.

•Examine theories that support unequal treatment of the sexes.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Why were women excluded from

science?

Why were women excluded from

science?

Why were women excluded from

science?

Why did it matter?

Why were women excluded from

science?

Why did it matter?

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Scientific theories of sex difference

Scientific theories of sex difference

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Scientific theories of sex difference

Scientific theories of sex difference

•Females less intelligent•Females less intelligent

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Scientific theories of sex difference

Scientific theories of sex difference

•Females less intelligent•Females less rational

•Females less intelligent•Females less rational

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Scientific theories of sex difference

Scientific theories of sex difference

•Females less intelligent•Females less rational•Too much schooling makes females infertile

•Females less intelligent•Females less rational•Too much schooling makes females infertilePHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Fit perfectly with society’s attitudes toward the sexes!

Fit perfectly with society’s attitudes toward the sexes!

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Scientific theories of sex difference

Scientific theories of sex difference

How to tell if these theories are good

ones?

How to tell if these theories are good

ones?

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Scientific theories of sex difference

Scientific theories of sex difference

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Excluding women was justifiable at the time, based on theories of sex difference.

Excluding women was justifiable at the time, based on theories of sex difference.

Excluding women was justifiable at the time, based on theories of sex difference.

Excluding women was justifiable at the time, based on theories of sex difference.We know now those theories were wrong, so exclusion now would be wrong.

We know now those theories were wrong, so exclusion now would be wrong.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Excluding women was a social/political move.

Excluding women was a social/political move.

Excluding women was a social/political move.

Excluding women was a social/political move.As a matter of equality of opportunity, excluding women is wrong.

As a matter of equality of opportunity, excluding women is wrong.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Was exclusion of women harmful to

science?

Was exclusion of women harmful to

science?

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Was exclusion of women harmful to

science?

Was exclusion of women harmful to

science?•Smaller pool of talent•Smaller pool of talent

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Was exclusion of women harmful to

science?

Was exclusion of women harmful to

science?•Smaller pool of talent•Affects what questions are asked

•Smaller pool of talent•Affects what questions are asked

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Was exclusion of women harmful to

science?

Was exclusion of women harmful to

science?•Smaller pool of talent•Affects what questions are asked•Accuracy and objectivity of scientific knowledge?

•Smaller pool of talent•Affects what questions are asked•Accuracy and objectivity of scientific knowledge?

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Did exclusion of women result in less accurate or objective scientific knowledge?

Did exclusion of women result in less accurate or objective scientific knowledge?NO: Proper use of scientific method produces good knowledge, no matter who’s using it.

NO: Proper use of scientific method produces good knowledge, no matter who’s using it.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

YES: Tribe of science produces good knowledge only if it is inclusive.

YES: Tribe of science produces good knowledge only if it is inclusive.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Did exclusion of women result in less accurate or objective scientific knowledge?

Did exclusion of women result in less accurate or objective scientific knowledge?

Biology & Gender Study Group

Biology & Gender Study Group

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Biology & Gender Study Group

Biology & Gender Study GroupFeminist critique of

science can lead to better science.

Feminist critique of science can lead to

better science.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Biology & Gender Study Group

Biology & Gender Study GroupFeminist critique of

science can lead to better science.

Feminist critique of science can lead to

better science.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Helps science live up to the norm of

organized skepticism by questioning unquestioned assumptions.

Helps science live up to the norm of

organized skepticism by questioning unquestioned assumptions.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

“… masculinist assumptions have impoverished biology by causing us to focus on certain problems to the exclusion of others, and they have led us to make particular interpretations when equally valid alternatives were available.”

“… masculinist assumptions have impoverished biology by causing us to focus on certain problems to the exclusion of others, and they have led us to make particular interpretations when equally valid alternatives were available.”

Biology & Gender Study Group

Biology & Gender Study Group

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Multiple theories can account for the same

set of data.

Multiple theories can account for the same

set of data.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Quine:Quine:

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Microvilli observed,

but ignored in accounts

of fertilization.

Microvilli observed,

but ignored in accounts

of fertilization.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Microvilli observed,

but ignored in accounts

of fertilization.

Microvilli observed,

but ignored in accounts

of fertilization.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

WHY?WHY?

Microvilli observed,

but ignored in accounts

of fertilization.

Microvilli observed,

but ignored in accounts

of fertilization.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

No good way to fit microvilli into gendered

fertilization story.

No good way to fit microvilli into gendered

fertilization story.

WHY?WHY?

Feminist critique as experimental

control:

Feminist critique as experimental

control:

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Feminist critique as experimental

control:

Feminist critique as experimental

control:

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Be aware of gendered

assumptions

Be aware of gendered

assumptions

Feminist critique as experimental

control:

Feminist critique as experimental

control:

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Strive not to build gendered

assumptions into scientific

theories

Strive not to build gendered

assumptions into scientific

theories

Be aware of gendered

assumptions

Be aware of gendered

assumptions

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

nucleuscytoplasm

cell membrane

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Models of nucleus-cytoplasm relation embodying societal views of marriage

Models of nucleus-cytoplasm relation embodying societal views of marriage

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Feminist critique as experimental

control:

Feminist critique as experimental

control:

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Feminist critique as experimental

control:

Feminist critique as experimental

control:Be aware of explanatory pattern forced by gendered thinking

Be aware of explanatory pattern forced by gendered thinking

Feminist critique as experimental

control:

Feminist critique as experimental

control:

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Consciously consider ungendered explanatory

patterns

Consciously consider ungendered explanatory

patterns

Be aware of explanatory pattern forced by gendered thinking

Be aware of explanatory pattern forced by gendered thinking

Helps science live up to the norm of

organized skepticism.

Helps science live up to the norm of

organized skepticism.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Feminist critique identifies background

assumptions.

Feminist critique identifies background

assumptions.

Biology & Gender Study Group

Biology & Gender Study Group

Examine gendered assumptionsExamine gendered assumptions

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Examine gendered assumptionsExamine gendered assumptions

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Fewer theories based on societal prejudices

Fewer theories based on societal prejudices

Examine gendered assumptionsExamine gendered assumptions

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Fewer theories based on societal prejudices

Fewer theories based on societal prejudices

More women in science?

More women in science?

Longino:Longino:

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Including women in the tribe of science

could make for more objective output.

Including women in the tribe of science

could make for more objective output.

Subjective -Subjective -

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Subjective -Subjective -

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

how things seem to mehow things seem to me

Subjective -Subjective -

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

how things seem to mehow things seem to me

Objective -Objective -

Subjective -Subjective -

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

how things seem to mehow things seem to me

Objective -Objective -how things actually arehow things actually are

Subjective -Subjective -

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

how things seem to mehow things seem to me

Objective -Objective -how things actually arehow things actually arewhat anyone could seewhat anyone could see

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Kuhn:Kuhn:

Same rules applied to same set of data can

lead to different pictures of reality.

Same rules applied to same set of data can

lead to different pictures of reality.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Kuhn:Kuhn:

Same rules applied to same set of data can

lead to different pictures of reality.

Same rules applied to same set of data can

lead to different pictures of reality.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Kuhn:Kuhn:

Observations are

theory-laden.

Observations are

theory-laden.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Peer ReviewPeer

Review

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Peer ReviewPeer

ReviewMy results (scientific paper)

My results (scientific paper)

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Peer ReviewPeer

Review

Journal editorJournal editor

My results (scientific paper)

My results (scientific paper)

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Peer ReviewPeer

ReviewMy results (scientific paper)

My results (scientific paper)

Journal editorJournal editor

Reviewers(other scientists)

Reviewers(other scientists)

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Reviewers evaluate the paper

Reviewers evaluate the paper

Peer ReviewPeer

Review

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Reviewers evaluate the paper

Reviewers evaluate the paper • Why not this

interpretation?• Why not this interpretation?

Peer ReviewPeer

Review

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Reviewers evaluate the paper

Reviewers evaluate the paper • Why not this

interpretation?• How does your finding fit with this other result?

• Why not this interpretation?• How does your finding fit with this other result?

Peer ReviewPeer

Review

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Reviewers evaluate the paper

Reviewers evaluate the paper • Why not this

interpretation?• How does your finding fit with this other result?• Did you control for X?

• Why not this interpretation?• How does your finding fit with this other result?• Did you control for X?

Peer ReviewPeer

Review

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Reviewers evaluate the paper

Reviewers evaluate the paper • Why not this

interpretation?• How does your finding fit with this other result?• Did you control for X?• You should also measure this.

• Why not this interpretation?• How does your finding fit with this other result?• Did you control for X?• You should also measure this.

Peer ReviewPeer

Review

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Peer ReviewPeer

ReviewI receive reviewsI receive reviews

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

I receive reviewsI receive reviews

Revise paper to respond to reviewsRevise paper to

respond to reviews

Peer ReviewPeer

Review

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Revise paper to respond to reviewsRevise paper to

respond to reviews

Journal editorJournal editor

Peer ReviewPeer

ReviewI receive reviewsI receive reviews

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Revise paper to respond to reviewsRevise paper to

respond to reviews

PublishedPublishedPublishedPublishedJournal editorJournal editor

Peer ReviewPeer

ReviewI receive reviewsI receive reviews

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Scientific knowledge from

my research plus

Scientific knowledge from

my research plustransformative criticism

and dialogue between me and my scientific

peers

transformative criticism

and dialogue between me and my scientific

peers

Peer ReviewPeer

Review

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

How composition of the tribe of science

matters:

How composition of the tribe of science

matters:

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

How composition of the tribe of science

matters:

How composition of the tribe of science

matters:•If all the members are similar, lots of agreement.

•If all the members are similar, lots of agreement.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

How composition of the tribe of science

matters:

How composition of the tribe of science

matters:•If all the members are similar, lots of agreement.•But, could be due to shared subjective biases!

•If all the members are similar, lots of agreement.•But, could be due to shared subjective biases!

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

How composition of the tribe of science

matters:

How composition of the tribe of science

matters:•If all the members are similar, lots of agreement.•But, could be due to shared subjective biases!•Dialogue with scientists with whom we disagree weeds out subjective bias.

•If all the members are similar, lots of agreement.•But, could be due to shared subjective biases!•Dialogue with scientists with whom we disagree weeds out subjective bias.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

How composition of the tribe of science

matters:

How composition of the tribe of science

matters:•If all the members are similar, lots of agreement.•But, could be due to shared subjective biases!•Dialogue with scientists with whom we disagree weeds out subjective bias.•Diverse community increases chances of disagreement.

•If all the members are similar, lots of agreement.•But, could be due to shared subjective biases!•Dialogue with scientists with whom we disagree weeds out subjective bias.•Diverse community increases chances of disagreement.

PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160

Clash of background assumptions brings

them out of the

background, opens them to

scrutiny.

Clash of background assumptions brings

them out of the

background, opens them to

scrutiny.

Recommended