Common XBRL Misconceptions

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

XBRL can be complicated to understand and implement, but there’s no doubt that it’s here to stay. This presentation, which lists four common XBRL misconceptions and their corresponding realities, offers an opportunity to learn the basics and can help guide your company toward XBRL compliance.

Citation preview

Common XBRL Misconceptions

...and the facts that reveal the truth

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

2

Since mandated in 2009, XBRL has caused confusion and uncertainty in financial reporting.

?

?

? ?

?

?

?

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

3

the SEC’s XBRL grace period ends.

It’s time for organizations to focus on XBRL compliance and learn the truth about common XBRL misconceptions.

October 31, 2014

On

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

4

XBRL Misconception #1

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

5

When unsure about which standard tag to use, create an extension tag.

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

6

?What’s the

reality?

???

?

?

? ? ?

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

7

Extension tags are overused.

One study reveals that

22.2% of reports from the financial industry use them.1

1 Columbia Business School Center for Excellence in Accounting and Security Analysis. Democratizing Transparency. New York: 2010. http://www4.gsb.columbia.edu/filemgr?file_id=7216992

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

8

Why is this problematic?

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

9

It undermines XBRL’s primary goal to make it easier for analysts and investors to compare companies…

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

10

…and:

Subjective extension tags leave more possibility for error, meaning extra costs for the filer.

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

11

So, what now?

Extension tags will remain, but filers should apply them with discretion.

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

12

More extensions

more manual labor & higher costs.

=

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

13

Align filings with XBRL best practices.

One Solution:

Source in-house software that o�ers access to precedents and searchable XBRL taxonomy and tags.

XBRL</>

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

14

XBRL Misconception #2

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

15

Outsourcing XBRL tagging is the best option.

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

16

?What’s the

reality?

???

?

?

? ? ?

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

17

Outsourcing has many disadvantages, meaning in-house XBRL tagging is the favorable choice.

XBRL</>

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

18

???

?

?

?

? ? ?Why?

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

19

Outsourcing is more expensive.

costlier than filing XBRL documents in-house.2

XBRL</>

30%

2 Gartner. Financial Statement Production Solution Increase Market Penetration. Stamford: 2010. http://www.gartner.com/id=1466426

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

20

XBRL</>

And…It shifts accountability from the filer to the outsourcer.This leaves room for errors and doesn’t allow for internal XBRL proficiency to grow.

XBRL</>

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

21

Other negative implications include

Security issues

Poor reporting work processes

Higher risk for errors

Longer turnaround times & potential for late filings

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

22

???

?

?

?

? ? ?So what now?

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

23

When it comes to in-house vs. outsourcing, the numbers speak for themselves…

In 2012, 50% of large accelerated filers chose to bring the tagging in-house.3

3 LogixData Analysis of XBRL Vendors and Their Market Share for 2012 and 2011. 13 Feb, 2013. http://www.logixdata.com/blog/bid/143011/Analysis-of-XBRL-vendors-and-their-market-share-for-2012-and-2011

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

24

….this is a ~25% increase from the year before.4

4 LogixData Analysis of XBRL Vendors and Their Market Share for 2012 and 2011. 13 Feb, 2013. http://www.logixdata.com/blog/bid/143011/Analysis-of-XBRL-vendors-and-their-market-share-for-2012-and-2011

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

25

XBRL Misconception #3

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

26

XBRL makes companies too transparent.

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

27

?What’s the

reality?

???

?

?

? ? ?

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

28

“XBRL in no way requires a company to change how, what, or when to report financial information. It does not provide more data than standard financial statements.”5

5 XBRL US. XBRL US GAAP Taxonomy Preparers Guide. Washington: 2008. http://xbrl.us/Documents/PreparersGuide.pdf

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

29

???

?

?

?

? ? ?Why?

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

30

Filers report the same information, but XBRL presents it in a computer readable format to make it more digestible.

XBRL

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

31

???

?

?

?

? ? ?So what now?

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

32

Filers should remember:

XBRL reporting is for the benefit of investors. Using it won’t put you at a competitive disadvantage.

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

33

For Example - Radyne Corporation

Company’s trading averages before XBRL adoption:

After XBRL adoption:

20,000 shares/day

135,000shares/day 6

6 PR Newswire. XBRL for the IRO: Benefiting from Interactive Data. PR Newswire Association LLC: 2011.http://promotions.prnewswire.com/rs/prnewswire/images/WP_XBRL_Benefiting_from_Interactive_Data.pdf

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

34

XBRL Misconception #4

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

35

SEC penalties for XBRL non-compliance aren’t a concern.</>

XBRL

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

36

?What’s the

reality?

???

?

?

? ? ?

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

37

They are.

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

38

???

?

?

?

? ? ?Why?

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

39

After this date, penalties for XBRL noncompliance will likely become harsher.

the SEC’s XBRL grace period ends.

October 31, 2014

On

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

40

…of those filings, 5,000 problems were identified.7

Last year, 1,400 XBRL filings were submitted to the SEC…

7 XBRL US. Avoiding Common Errors in XBRL Creation. Washington: 2010. http://xbrl.us/research/documents/avoidingerrorswhitepaper.pdf

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

41

???

?

?

?

? ? ?So what now?

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

42

Companies need to focus on reducing errors by making a stronger e�ort to learn XBRL inside and out.

XBRL

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

43

Taking responsibility for XBRL reporting now will mean a decreased risk for harsher SEC penalties after the grace period ends.

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

44

Read this: Find out what’s up and coming for XBRL this year. Read our whitepaper XBRL Trends to Expect in 2013

Print this: Or see who comes out on top – in-house or outsourced XBRL solutions - in this XBRL Cup Infographic

Resources

www.DisclosureNet.com | Copyright © 2013 DisclosureNet™

45

Looking for a quick, easy way to pull information from XBRL filings? 

Contact us.

DisclosureNet™330 Bay Street, Suite 200Toronto, ON M5H2S8T: 866.974.3638F: 416.913.0446

General InquiriesT: 866.974.3638 x0info@disclosurenet.com

SolutionsT: 866.974.3638 x2solutions@disclosurenet.com