What We Believe: Forgiveness and Reconciliation Jaimée Allman & Geoffrey Sutton Evangel...

Preview:

Citation preview

What We Believe: Forgiveness and Reconciliation

Jaimée Allman & Geoffrey Sutton

Evangel University

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 1

Overview

Our purpose was to explore how participants conceptualize forgiveness, reconciliation, guilt, and trust, as well as the relationship between the aforementioned variables to willingness to forgive, and to spirituality.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 2

Scripture

The text of Matthew 6 suggests an expectation of reconciliation.

Matthew 6 and Matthew 18 suggest negative consequences for failing to forgive.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 3

What is Forgiveness?

Despite exponential growth in published research on the psychology of forgiveness, researchers have not reached a consensus on a definition of forgiveness (Worthington, 2006).

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 4

Something in Common

Some psychological researchers have noted commonalities such as noting that forgiving an offender is distinct from condoning, denying, excusing, forgetting, or pardoning an offender (Enright & Coyle, 1998; McCullough, Bono, & Root, 2005).

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 5

Forgiveness & Reconciliation

Most psychological researchers also assert that forgiveness is distinct from reconciliation (e.g., Enright, Gassin, & Wu, 1992; Sutton & Thomas, 2005b; Worthington & Drinkard, 2000).

Forgiveness is intrapersonal

Reconciliation is interpersonal

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 6

A Difference

In contrast to these conceptualizations, Aquino, Tripp, and Bies (2001) viewed reconciliation as a behavioral manifestation of forgiveness.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 7

Research by Kanz, 2000

Most undergraduate respondents did not distinguish between the concepts of forgiveness and reconciliation.

This forgiveness-reconciliation issue is a key focus of our study along with looking at the parameters of forgiveness in “everyday use.”

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 8

Our Purpose

1. We hypothesized that we would find support for Kanz’ findings that forgiveness and reconciliation are overlapping concepts for most people.

2. We hypothesized that most participants would recognize the difference between forgiveness and select related concepts like trust and apology.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 9

Our Purpose

3. We hypothesized that most participants would recognize the difference between forgiveness and the restoration of errant leaders

Here we report some initial findings…

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 10

General Procedure

• Presented packets to students– Consent signed

– Forgiveness concept items

– Two measures

– Demographic questions

– Explained survey at the end

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 11

Study Materials

• Forgiveness survey 14 items: Likert type (Adapted from Kanz, 2000)

• Willingness to Forgive 12 item Likert type scale (DeShea, 2003)

• Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith5 item Likert type scale (Plante et al., 2002)

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 12

Participants

Christian College

Women = 113

Men = 52

Age (M = 19.42, SD = 2.11)

Non-Christian College

Women = 32

Men = 10

Age (M = 20.69, SD = 6.38)

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 13

Participants

Christian College

Ethnicity Percent

European 83.1

African 3.6

Hispanic 4.2

Native American 1.2

Non-Christian College

Ethnicity Percent

European 79.5

African 4.5

Hispanic 2.3

Asian/Pacific 2.3

Other 6.8

Not reporting 4.5

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 14

Participants

Christian College

Willingness to Forgive

M = 41.87, SD = 11.48

Coeff alpha = .91

Spirituality (Santa Clara)

M = 17.51, SD =2.48

Coeff alpha = .83

Non-Christian College

Willingness to Forgive

M = 41.28, SD = 13.98

Coeff alpha = .93

Spirituality (Santa Clara)

M = 14.44, SD = 4.12

Coeff alpha = .91

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 15

Survey Results

Strongly Agree +Agree =Agree percentage

Strongly Disagree + Disagree = Disagree percentage.

We did not include the neutral percentage, which can be deduced by subtraction.

We invite you to interact with us by considering each question.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 16

1: Christians are more forgiving

1: In general, Christians are more forgiving than non-Christians.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 17

1: In general, Christians are more forgiving than non-Christians.

Non-Christian CollegeAgree 38.6 ; Disagree 36.4

Christian College Agree 33.1; Disagree 36.1

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 18

2: An apology is necessary

2: An apology is necessary before I would forgive someone for other than a minor offense.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 19

2: An apology is necessary before I would forgive someone for other than a minor offense.

Non-Christian CollegeAgree 70.9 ; Disagree 31.8

Christian College Agree 15.8; Disagree 66.1

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 20

3. Forgiveness is Christian

3: Forgiveness is primarily a Christian idea.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 21

3: Forgiveness is primarily a Christian idea.Non-Christian CollegeAgree 11.3 ; Disagree 70.4

Christian College Agree 16.3; Disagree 66.9

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 22

4. guilt

4: I feel guilty if I do not forgive someone.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 23

4: I feel guilty if I do not forgive someone.

Non-Christian CollegeAgree 54.6 ; Disagree 15.9

Christian College Agree 73.5; Disagree 6.0

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 24

5. friend versus stranger

5: It is easier to forgive a friend or family member than a stranger for the same offense.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 25

5: It is easier to forgive a friend or family member than a stranger for the same offense.

Non-Christian CollegeAgree 63.6 ; Disagree 31.8

Christian College Agree 40; Disagree 45.5

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 26

6. Forgive and forget?

6: I think true forgiveness means you try to forget what the person did to you.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 27

6: I think true forgiveness means you try to forget what the person did to you.

Non-Christian CollegeAgree 52.3 ; Disagree 34.1

Christian College Agree 43.9; Disagree 41.4

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 28

7. reconciliation

7: I think true forgiveness means you also reconcile with the person who offended you.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 29

7: I think true forgiveness means you also reconcile with the person who offended you.

Non-Christian CollegeAgree 81.9 ; Disagree 6.8

Christian College Agree 70.9; Disagree 17.5

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 30

8. admit and change

8: People need to admit what they have done and change before you forgive them.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 31

8: People need to admit what they have done and change before you forgive them.

Non-Christian CollegeAgree 36.4 ; Disagree 43.1

Christian College Agree 31.3; Disagree 53.7

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 32

9. restoration

9: If someone lost their job or position of leadership because of wrongdoing, then forgiveness means they must be restored to their former position.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 33

9: If someone lost their job or position of leadership because of wrongdoing, then forgiveness means they must be restored to their former position.

Non-Christian CollegeAgree 9.1 ; Disagree 77.3

Christian College Agree 2.4; Disagree 89.2

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 34

10. forgive to be forgiven

10: People must forgive others in order to obtain God’s forgiveness.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 35

10: People must forgive others in order to obtain God’s forgiveness.

Non-Christian CollegeAgree 65.2 ; Disagree 18.6

Christian College Agree 65.6; Disagree 18.1

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 36

11. trust

11: If you forgive someone it means you start trusting them again.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 37

11: If you forgive someone it means you start trusting them again.Non-Christian CollegeAgree 13.6 ; Disagree 61.3

Christian College Agree 9.6; Disagree 69.3

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 38

12. too forgiving?

12: If you are too free with forgiveness, you will encourage people to keep hurting others.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 39

12: If you are too free with forgiveness, you will encourage people to keep hurting others.Non-Christian CollegeAgree 36.4 ; Disagree 40.9

Christian College Agree 22.3; Disagree 55.4

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 40

13. anger

13: When you truly forgive people, you are no longer angry with them for what they did.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 41

13. When you truly forgive people, you are no longer angry with them for what they did.

Non-Christian CollegeAgree 59.1 ; Disagree 25

Christian College Agree 65.1; Disagree 18.1

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 42

14. avoidance

14: If you truly forgive people, you stop avoiding them when you see them.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 43

14: If you truly forgive people, you stop avoiding them when you see them.

Non-Christian CollegeAgree 61.4 ; Disagree 18.1

Christian College Agree 53; Disagree 17.5

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 44

Discussion

• Apology as necessary

Clearly divided: 71% non-Christian vs. 16% Christian.

• Guilty feelings

A Christian college thing 73% vs. 55%.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 45

Discussion

• Repentance (admit and change)

Most believe this is not needed to forgive. But about one in three expect you to change.

• Restoration

Have they had enough? No need to restore a fallen leader to the same position.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 46

Discussion

• God’s forgiveness as contingent

Most believe you must forgive to get God’s forgiveness.

• Trust

Most believe you do not have to trust just because you forgive.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 47

Discussion

• How many times should you forgive?

Some disagreement on being too forgiving but a substantial minority believe it is possible to be too forgiving.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 48

Discussion

Anger & Avoidance

Two concepts that forgiveness researchers believe you need to reduce as evidence of forgiveness.

Most of our participants agree.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 49

Discussion

Forgiveness and Reconciliation- our key focus

Our results reflected beliefs similar to those identified by Kanz (2000). A majority of participants in both studies agreed that reconciliation is a necessary part of forgiveness.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 50

Discussion

Much of the research concerning forgiveness has maintained that there is a distinct difference between forgiveness and reconciliation. Our research, along with Kanz (2000), indicates otherwise; participants see the two processes as intertwined.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 51

Discussion

These forgiveness and reconciliation findings are important for both researchers and practitioners because they dramatically affect how we examine the issue both in study and in therapy.

If psychotherapists follow the teaching of the leading researchers, they will be out of touch with the belief system of some clients.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 52

Discussion

The integration of Christianity and Psychology is an issue here.

Psychological approaches emphasize the intrapersonal aspect of forgiveness.

Christian teaching focuses on forgiving in the context of reconciliation in a faith community.

Christian participants appear to accept the latter as normative.

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 53

Questions & Comments

What We Believe:

Forgiveness and ReconciliationJaimée Allman & Geoffrey Sutton

Evangel University

Email for copies suttong@evangel.edu

More on forgiveness on website http://www.evangel.edu/Directory/Bios/Index.asp?username=SuttonG

Allman & Sutton, 2008-2009 54