Water Marketing and Groundwater Banking in California · PDF fileWater Marketing and...

Preview:

Citation preview

Water Marketing and Groundwater Banking in California

Ellen Hanak Public Policy Institute of California

California Water Commission 11-20-13

What are these tools and why do they matter?

Water marketing: temporary, long-term or permanent trades of water-use rights

Groundwater banking: storage of surface water in aquifers in wet years for use in dry years

Why these tools matter for California:

– Reducing costs of drought – Accommodating shifts in demand – Adapting to a changing climate

2

Marketing and banking have requirements and constraints

Infrastructure – To connect source/destination – To get/store/retrieve water from banks

Protections – Shouldn’t sell someone else’s water (incl.

water for fish & wildlife) – Need to protect water in “bank accounts” – Aim to prevent local economic harm

3

California’s extensive infrastructure facilitates marketing and banking

4

Counties in the market

But Delta is a fragile hub for north-south and east-west transfers

5

State groundwater law has gaps; many rural counties restrict exports

6

Three phases in water market development

7

Drought-related growth

(1987–94)

Environment-related growth

(1995–2002)

LT trade growth & overall deceleration

(2003–11)

Long-term and permanent trades now dominate the market

Mostly for cities But also for high-

value farms And some

environmental uses

8

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

1987-1994 1995-2002 2003-2011

Wat

er tr

aded

(milli

on a

cre-

feet

) Short-term flows

Long-term flows

Permanent flows

Additional long-termcommitments

Additional permanent commitments

Slowing market was unable to provide much drought relief

Infrastructure constraints: Delta

Institutional constraints: complex, frequently changing approval process

In all, 500,000–600,000 acre-feet dry-year supplies from 2007–2010

9

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Wat

er tr

aded

(milli

ons

of a

cre-

feet

)

Dry years Short-term contractsLT & permanent flows Additional commitments

North-south trades are down; San Joaquin Valley is now net exporter

10

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200Sac Valley SJ Valley So Cal Bay Area

Net

wat

er im

ports

(exp

orts

) (ta

f/yea

r)*

1987-941995-20022003-11

* non-environmental trades (actual flows)

Purchases of water for the environment are now falling

Can lessen conflicts and raise efficiency

But cash running out (~50% was from state bonds)

11

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Env

ironm

enta

l wat

er tr

aded

(taf

)

Salton Sea mitigation Other instream flows (§1707) Delta flows (EWA) San Joaquin/eastside flows (WAP) Wildlife refuges (DFG & WAP)

Several types of groundwater management and storage in CA

Formal: adjudicated basins and special districts with accounting for pumping/recharge (So Cal, Silicon Valley)

Informal: voluntary, price incentives but no accounting (most common)

Semi-formal: accounting for bank members, not for other local pumpers (Kern County)

Our focus: banking for off-site parties in Kern and So Cal

12

Formal systems: mainly in urban areas, rely on imported recharge

13

Kern County banks involving off-site parties

14

New groundwater banks were very useful during recent drought

Total withdrawals 2007–10: 1.9 maf (3x more than water market)

Rapid recharge thanks to post-drought rains

But some conflicts in Kern County over falling groundwater tables

15

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Milli

ons

of a

cre-

feet

sto

red

Dry years Kern County (all parties) So Cal (Met)

How can we work out the kinks in these important tools?

Address infrastructure gaps Make institutional review process more

consistent, transparent, predictable Strengthen local groundwater management Develop models to mitigate local economic

impacts Pursue more environmental transfers Engage high-level leaders who can take needed

risks and break through barriers

16

For more information

Hanak and Stryjewski (2012) California’s Water Market, By the Numbers: Update 2012, Public Policy Institute of California. Available at www.ppic.org

17

18

Notes on the use of these slides

These slides were created to accompany a presentation. They do not include full documentation of sources, data samples, methods, and interpretations. To avoid misinterpretations, please contact: Ellen Hanak: 415-291-4433, hanak@ppic.org Thank you for your interest in this work.

Recommended