View
218
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/30/2019 W1D1D23.16.12
1/3
How does the identification of cultural universals impact our understanding of what it
means to be human? How does the search for universals help us better understand
human cultural behavior? What examples from your own culture can illustrate the ideas
that our behaviors are impacted by our culture more than our biology? Use terminology
from the text and ideas from your own life to support your answers.
Cultural universals suggest that all human beings have basic things in common. This
helps to define what it means to be human for some, but the cultural norms listed in our
text just confuse the issue for me because most of them were not exclusive to human
beings. The text identifies myths, body adornment, division of labor, kinship systems,
and fear of snakes ( , 2010, 1.3) as cultural universals. Firstly, if animals have myths,
how would we know? Decorator crabs adorn themselves with sea anemones to fend
off predators (Mizejewski, 2010). Hermit crabs have also been known to adorn
themselves with vintage snail shells. Ants and bees both have a complex labor divisionsystem, and ants build living structures equivalent to cities in proportion to their body
sizes. Anyone who has ever seen a mouse fed to a snake can make the case for other
animals fear of snakes. One of my guy friends has a huge boa that he feeds two live
mice to about once a week. One week I was over his place and kept hearing a strange
scrabbling and thumping sound. When we went to check it out, we discovered that the
snake had eaten the first mouse. After seeing the fate of his companion, the second
mouse was frantically leaping up to the ceiling of the cage and trying to claw his way
out. Eventually, the mouses body weight would become too much for it to support with
its claws, and it would fall to the bottom of the cage, making a thumping sound. The
mouse continued to do this until it literally passed out. From that point onwards, my
friend decided to feed his snake one mouse at a time.
I say all of this to say that it is incredibly difficult to define what it is to be human. Does
the fact that we share many cultural universals with other species undermine our
humanity and distinctness? I dont know. Humanity is more than just the things that
people have in common, it is also their cultural polarity and diversity. Self-introspection
is a universal that most human cultures share, but without a medium for communication,
we cant be sure that animals dont do that as well. The situation with the Japanese
monkeys and the sweet potatoes proves that animals can pass things down along
generational lines, or, in other words, teach their children. Just as animals may exhibit
behavior that is surprisingly human, human beings can display behavior that is
frighteningly animalistic. To me, the Wall Street investment bankers who put profit
before people and crashed our economy are not human, but biologically speaking, they
are. The dehumanization of African Americans within early American society is an
example of how humans can not only behave like animals, but consider other humans
to be animals as well. Yet in a way these two examples are at the very core of what
7/30/2019 W1D1D23.16.12
2/3
makes us human. Animals dont have greed, they dont commit genocide because they
understand on a certain level that they live in balance with other forms of life within their
ecosystem. Animals could never own slaves and rarely do they profit off of the efforts of
other members of their own species. Even when animals profit off of the efforts of other
species, it is generally reciprocal, unlike with humans. Yes, there are many universals
that make us human, and not all of them are good.
References
Mizejewski, D. (25 January 2010). Weird Critter Profile: Decorator Crabs. Animal Planet
Blog. Retrieved from http://blogs.discovery.com/animal_oddities/2010/01/decorator-
crabs.html
Nowak,B., and Laird,P. (2010). Cultural Anthropology. Bridgepoint, 2010.
There are two main approaches to the practice of anthropology: ethnography and
ethnology (Nowak and Laird, 2010, 28). First define each in your own words. Next,
imagine you are a cultural anthropologist studying any culture or cultures that you are
interested in. Which approach would you use in your study and why? What methods
would you use to gather your data? What potential issues may you face while
conducting your fieldwork and how would you deal with them? Make sure you use
proper terminology from your text in your post.
Ethnology is comparing one or many cultures. Ethnography is studying a culture up
close. To me, this suggests that ethnology is more the study of cultures and
ethnography is a study of cultural interaction.
If I was a cultural anthropologist, I would take an ethnographic approach. As a
community organizer by trade, I have learned that individuals directly affected by issues
make the best advocates. In the same way that anthropologists respect the cultures that
they study, organizers have a great deal of respect for the neighborhoods they
organize. In a way, the organizer becomes a participant observer of the community they
work in. We do our preliminary research, using narrative interviews (or 121s) to develop
a power map of the area. We take into consideration political and corporate climate
and how it impacts residents. Above all, organizers, like ethnographers, realize that
relationships are reciprocal. The difference is that an ethnographer does not enter a
particular region for the express purpose of changing the culture, just observing it. It
does seem like some cultural anthropologists do use qualitative data to shape policies
to the benefit of the communities they study. In contrast, a community organizer
http://blogs.discovery.com/animal_oddities/2010/01/decorator-crabs.htmlhttp://blogs.discovery.com/animal_oddities/2010/01/decorator-crabs.htmlhttp://blogs.discovery.com/animal_oddities/2010/01/decorator-crabs.htmlhttp://blogs.discovery.com/animal_oddities/2010/01/decorator-crabs.html7/30/2019 W1D1D23.16.12
3/3
develops a leadership base within a particular geographical area that will address
inequities within their own neighborhoods by confronting the existing power structure.
As an organizer, my primary data comes from narrative interviews. The reason we use
narrative interviews in organizing is because listening to a persons story is the best way
to learn what shapes the person that they are, and to determine if they have similarvalues and self-interest to you. As an ethnographer, I would likely also use narrative
interviews to get to know the culture I was studying. I would also take lots of pictures
and audio recordings to make sure I got an objective view of the culture. I really liked
the picture in the book of the Masai warrior taking a picture of his town. The
anthropologist in that situation got to literally see the mans village through his own
eyes! But even though a picture is worth a thousand words, oral histories and
storytelling are the basis of many non-literate cultures and I think to really understand a
culture, you have to have people that live in it tell you their stories.
Another key difference between organizing and cultural anthropology is that anorganizer generally works with a specific subset of a generally familiar culture, whereas
a cultural anthropologist often does field work with a completely unfamiliar culture. One
challenge of being an anthropologist would be learning different languages. Being able
to communicate in ones native tongue often is the first brick laid on the road to trust. I
learn new languages pretty quickly, but all of the languages Ive ever tried to learn are
either Latin or Germanic languages. I dont think I would do very well with an Asian
language or a character based written language. Im also borderline phobic of roaches. I
used to live in Florida, where they get HUGE cockroaches called palmetto bugs. Once a
palmetto bug was outside my door, and I could not force myself to kill it or to step over
it. I locked myself in my car and had to wait until my roommate came home and killed
the bug to go into my house. I dont think I could sleep in most of the places the authors
of our book did fieldwork. I would be too paranoid about bugs crawling on me while I
slept!
References
Nowak,B., and Laird,P. (2010). Cultural Anthropology. Bridgepoint, 2010.
Recommended