View
0
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Fall 2011
The LEAD/MEPI
Students’ Feedback
Survey Report
Prepared by Ola Anwar
Page 2 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table of Contents Page
Executive Summary 3
Section I: Q.1: Please identify yourself 3 Q.2: Gender 4 Q.3: What is your cohort number? 4 Section II: Q.4: a. Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality? b. Please specify 5 Q.5: Please indicate your level of agreement regarding the following statements. 5
Section III:
Q.6: Student life values: Please indicate your level of agreement regarding the following statements. 10
Section IV:
Cross tabulations questions. 13
Section V:
Q.7: Please suggest any areas for improvement. 32
Q.8: Please feel free to add any other comments. 33
Page 3 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Executive Summary
Introduction
As part of the Leadership for Education and Development Program (LEAD) and Middle East Partnership Initiative
Tomorrow's Leaders (MEPI TL) at the American University in Cairo (AUC), the LEAD/MEPI TL program, conducted in
cooperation with the Office of Institutional Research (IR) an online survey to solicit the LEAD/MEPI TL students’
feedback about their coordinators within the LEAD/MEPI program mission and objective. The LEAD/MEPI TL office
intends to use the survey findings to improve their program.
In December 8, 2011 the Office of Institutional Research, emailed survey invitations to 288 LEAD/MEPI students.
Two survey email reminders were sent on December 15th and 22nd
, 2011 and remained accessible until January
15th
, 2012. When the survey was closed 148 out of 288 (51.4%) responded.
Methodology and Organization of the Report
This report is divided into five sections. In Section I, demographics’ information are presented as frequencies and
as charts. Section II, includes the students’ evaluations to the coordinators as frequencies and as charts.
Furthermore, the student’s life values are presented in Section III, as frequencies and as charts. In Section IV, the
cross tabulations questions are presented in frequency tables. In Section V, the respondents’ comments and
suggestions for more improvement are presented.
Students’ Demographics:
The LEAD students presented 79.1% and the MEPI students presented 20.9%. Students’ gender was 39.9% ‘male’,
and 60.1% ‘female’.
The students’ cohort number was reported as follows: 1.4% of the students were from ‘cohort #1’, 5.4% from
‘cohort #2’, 8.8% from ‘cohort #3’, 12.8% from ‘cohort # 4’, 7.4% from ‘cohort #5’, 15.5% from ‘cohort # 6’, 12.8%
from ‘cohort #7’, 31.8% from ‘cohort #8 and 4.1% did not report this question .
Section I
Page 4 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table A
Please identify your self
Frequency Percent
LEAD Student 117 79.1%
MEPI Student 31 20.9%
Total 148 100%
Table 1
Gender Frequency Percent
Male 59 39.9%
Female 89 60.1%
Total 148 100%
Figure 1
Table 2
Cohort # Frequency Percent
1 2 1.4%
2 8 5.4%
3 13 8.8%
4 19 12.8%
5 11 7.4%
6 23 15.5%
7 19 12.8%
8 47 31.8%
Missing 6 4.1%
Total 148 100%
Figure 2
Male
Female
40%
60%
Cohort #1
Cohort #2
Cohort #3
Cohort #4
Cohort #5
Cohort #6
Cohort #7
Cohort # 8
1.4%
5.4%
8.8%
12.8%
7.4%
15.5%
12.8%
31.8%
Page 5 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
In this section, when the students were asked “Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students
with equality?”, 79.7% reported “Yes”, 9.5% reported “No” and 10.8% did not answer this question.
For the question, “My coordinator has an understanding of AUC’s liberal education system”, 59.9%
of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 30.4% reported ‘agree’, 8.1% reported ‘neutral’, no one
reported ‘disagree’, 0.7% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 1.4% did not report this question.
For the question, “Individual and group meetings with my coordinator are sufficient”, 39.2% of the
students reported ‘strongly agree’, 40.5 % reported ‘agree’, 13.5% reported ‘neutral’, 5.4% reported
‘disagree’, no one reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 1.4% of the students did not report this question.
For the question, “My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link them to LEAD’s
overall outcomes and objectives”, 37.2% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 41.2% reported
‘agree’, 12.8% reported ‘neutral’, 4.1% reported ‘disagree’, 1.4% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and
3.4% did not answer this question.
For the question, “My coordinator encourages participatory planning and implementation of
activities”, 43.2% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 40.5% reported ‘agree’, 10.8% reported
‘neutral’, 2% reported ‘disagree’, 1.4% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 2% did not report this
question.
For the question, “My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.g. meeting
deadlines, arriving on time and active class participation”, 53.4% of the students reported ‘strongly
agree’, 36.5% reported ‘agree’, 7.4% reported ‘neutral’, 0.7% reported ‘disagree’, no one reported
‘strongly disagree’ and 2% did not report this question.
For the question, “My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among students”, 42.6% of
the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 33.1% reported ‘agree’, 14.9% reported ‘neutral’, 6.8%
reported ‘disagree’, no one reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 2.7% did not answer this question.
For the question, “My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback”, 28.4% of the students reported
‘strongly agree’, 43.2% reported ‘agree’, 16.9% reported ‘neutral’, 7.4 % reported ‘disagree’, 2%
reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 2% did not report this question.
For the question, “My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post
training assignments, reflection forms and group projects)”, 35.1% of the students reported
‘strongly agree’, 37.2% reported ‘agree’, 17.6% reported ‘neutral’, 8.1% reported ‘disagree’, no one
reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 2% did not answer this question.
Section II
Page 6 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
For the question, “My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership and civic
engagement activities in real life”, 43.2% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 30.4% reported
‘agree’, 17.6% reported ‘neutral’, 4.7% reported ‘disagree’, 1.4% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and
2.7% did not report this question.
For the question, “My coordinator is challenging me to use my maximum potential”, 39.2% of the
students reported ‘strongly agree’, 29.1% reported ‘agree’, 19.6% reported ‘neutral’, 8.1% reported
‘disagree’, 2.7% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 1.4% did not answer this question.
For the question, “My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives support if needed”,
43.9% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 34.5% reported ‘agree’, 10.8% reported ‘neutral’,
5.4% reported ‘disagree’, 2.7% reported ‘strongly disagree’, and 2.7% did not report this question.
Descriptive Analysis For Section II
Table 3A
Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality?
Frequency Percent
Yes 118 79.7%
No 14 9.5%
Missing 16 10.8%
Total 148 100%
Figure 3A
89%
11%
Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality?
Yes No
Page 7 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Q.3B: Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality? Please specify:
Negative comments:
I feel that the coordinator does not treat all the LEADers fairly: does not give all of them the
same attention. that is only my feeling however she is nice to all of us
The way she gives me her feedback about things I ask her about it, is not the same way she gives
to some specific people.
When I need her, even if it's urgent, ""I must take appointment via e-mail first, but sometimes
she accepts another people to come in to the office and talk without appointments and they
take long time discussing issues not only 5 or 10 minutes, but more".
biased to women and supporters of women rights
"I think both Sulaf taha and Huda Mosa are doing their best. However there are some students
who feel inequality in the treatment of the coordinator"
She treats some students better than others because she loves them more as they always visit
her office.
She tries her best, but still you can feel it when she favorites some students, and speaks with
them more friendly. However, I don't think she does this when grading or anything.
Positive comments:
She treats all of us fairly and provides help any time we need. I feel she is like our mother.
She tries to have individual meetings with all students who are not willing to create a personal
relationship with her.
She tries to set meetings with all the students if they need help...............
The coordinator treats all students equally, nonetheless many of our requests that we have
been asking for through the whole semester have not been fulfilled and I feel like this is the
coordinator's job to take our requests to the high board and to do her best in achieving the
things that we need.
Though our coordinator is Christian, she treats all of us the same way. I have never felt any kind
of discrimination is the way she treats any of the students, including me
Through mutual understanding and dialogue we all participate equally in the decision making
process.
We all have equal chances, we're all treated in a very fair way
We are all different, and though our coordinator is Christian and most of us are Muslims and not
Egyptians, she still treats us very well and offers help all the time. I have never felt any
discrimination in her acts towards us in any way
General comments:
Don't know for sure
Page 8 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 4
Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Missing Total
My coordinator has an understanding of AUC's liberal education system
88 45 12
0
1 2 148
59.5% 30.4% 8.1% 0.7% 1.4% 100%
Individual and group meetings with my coordinator are sufficient.
58 60 20 8 0
2 148
39.2% 40.5% 13.5% 5.4% 1.4% 100%
My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link them to LEAD'S overall outcomes and objectives.
55 61 19 6 2 5 148
37.2% 41.2% 12.8% 4.1% 1.4% 3.4% 100%
My coordinator encourages participatory planning and implementation of activities.
64 60 16 3 2 3 148
43.2% 40.5% 10.8% 2.0% 1.4% 2.0% 100%
My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.g meeting deadlines, arriving on time and active class participation).
79 54 11 1 0
3 148
53.4% 36.5% 7.4% 0.7% 2.0% 100%
My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among students.
63 49 22 10 0
4 148
42.6% 33.1% 14.9% 6.8% 2.7% 100%
My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback.
42 64 25 11 3 3 148
28.4% 43.2% 16.9% 7.4% 2.0% 2.0% 100%
My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post training assignments, reflection forms and group projects).
52 55 26 12
0
3 148
35.1% 37.2% 17.6% 8.1% 2.0% 100%
My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership and civic engagement activities in real life.
64 45 26 7 2 4 148
43.2% 30.4% 17.6% 4.7% 1.4% 2.7% 100%
My coordinator is challenging me to use my maximum potential.
58 43 29 12 4 2 148
39.2% 29.1% 19.6% 8.1% 2.7% 1.4% 100%
My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives support if needed.
65 51 16 8 4 4 148
43.9% 34.5% 10.8% 5.4% 2.7% 2.7% 100%
Page 9 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Figure 4
My coordinator has an understanding of AUC's liberal educationsystem .
Individual and group meetings with my coordinator are sufficient.
My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link themto LEAD'S overall outcomes and objectives.
My coordinator encourages participatory planning andimplementation of activities.
My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.gmeeting deadlines, arriving on time and active class participation).
My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among students.
My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback.
My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment(e.g., post training assignments, reflection forms and group
projects).
My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership andcivic engagement activities in real life.
My coordinator is challenging me to use my maximum potential.
My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives support ifneeded.
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Page 10 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
In this section, the students indicate to what extent their life values were significant.
For the question, “My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion, political
beliefs, culture, etc. ..), 40.5% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 35.8% reported ‘agree’, 10.1%
reported ‘neutral’, 2% reported ‘disagree’, 0.7% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 10.8% did not report this
question.
For the question, “My coordinator encourages a two way dialogue with students”, 34.5% of the students
reported ‘strongly agree’, 37.2% reported ‘agree’, 14.9% reported ‘neutral’, 2% reported ‘disagree’, no
one reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 11.5% did not answer this question.
For the question, “My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freely even if I disagree with
his/her opinion”, 41.2% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 31.1% reported ‘agree’, 12.8% reported
‘neutral’, 2% reported ‘disagree’, no one reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 12.8% did not report this
question.
For the question, “My coordinator gives timely feedback/advice when needed”, 43.2% of the students
reported ‘strongly agree’, 26.4% reported ‘agree’, 12.2% reported ‘neural’, 4.7% reported ‘disagree’, 0.7%
reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 12.8% did not report this question.
For the question, “My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can express myself”, 40.5% of
the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 29.7% reported ‘agree’, 13.5% reported ‘neutral’, 2.7% reported
‘disagree’, 1.4% reported ‘strongly disagree’, and 12.2% did not report this question.
For the question, “My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions (i.e. selection process,
semester abroad, etc..)”, 34.5% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 33.8% reported ‘agree’, 16.2%
reported ‘neutral’, 2.7% reported ‘disagree’, 1.4% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 11.5% did not answer
this question.
For the question, “My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and
professional growth when needed”, 34.5% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 37.2% reported
‘agree’ 12.2% reported ‘neutral’, 4.1% reported ‘disagree’, no one reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 12.2%
did not report this question.
For the question “My coordinator encourages participation in different learning/development
opportunities”, 41.9% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 36.5% reported ‘agree’, 9.5% reported
‘neutral’, 0.7% reported ‘disagree’, no one reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 11.5% did not answer this
question.
For the question, “My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values which are:
integrity, professionalism, inclusivity, student centeredness and social responsibility”, 45.3% of the
student reported ‘strongly agree’, 33.1% reported ‘agree’, 8.8% reported ‘neutral’, no one reported either
‘disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree' and 12.8% did not report this question.
Section III
Page 11 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Descriptive Analysis For Section III
Table 5
Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Missing Total
My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion, political beliefs, culture, etc..)
60 53 15 3 1 16 148
40.5% 35.8% 10.1% 2.0% 0.7% 10.8% 100%
My coordinator encourages a two way dialogue with students.
51 55 22 3 0
17 148
34.5% 37.2% 14.9% 2.0% 11.5% 100%
My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freely even if I disagree with his/her opinion.
61 46 19 3 0
19 148
41.2% 31.1% 12.8% 2.0% 12.8% 100%
My coordinator gives timely feedback/advice when needed.
64 39 18 7 1 19 148
43.2% 26.4% 12.2% 4.7% 0.7% 12.8% 100%
My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can express myself.
60 44 20 4 2 18 148
40.5% 29.7% 13.5% 2.7% 1.4% 12.2% 100%
My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions, (i.e. selection process, semester abroad, etc..).
51 50 24 4 2 17 148
34.5% 33.8% 16.2% 2.7% 1.4% 11.5% 100%
My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and professional growth when needed.
51 55 18 6 0
18 148
34.5% 37.2% 12.2% 4.1% 12.2% 100%
My coordinator encourages participation in different learning/development opportunities.
62 54 14 1 0
17 148
41.9% 36.5% 9.5% 0.7% 11.5% 100%
My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values which are: integrity, professionalism, inclusivity, student centeredness and social responsibility.
67 49 13 0
0
19 148
45.3% 33.1% 8.8% 12.8% 100%
Page 12 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Figure 5
My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e.discussions in religion, political beliefs, culture, etc..)
My coordinator encourages a two way dialogue with students.
My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freelyeven if I disagree with his/her opinion.
My coordinator gives timely feedback/advice when needed.
My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I canexpress myself.
My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions,(i.e. selection process, semester abroad, etc..).
My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for mypersonal and professional growth when needed.
My coordinator encourages participation in differentlearning/development opportunities.
My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student lifevalues which are: integrity, professionalism, inclusivity,
studentcenteredness and social responsibility.
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Page 13 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
[The cohort #] by the level of agreement regarding different statements (Q.4)] Table 6A
My coordinator has an understanding of AUC's liberal education system. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Strongly Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 2 4 2 0
8
25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 100%
3 7 4 2 0
13
53.8% 30.8% 15.4% 100%
4 8 8 1 1 18
44.4% 44.4% 5.6% 5.6% 100%
5 10 1 0 0
11
90.9% 9.1% 100%
6 13 8 2 0
23
56.5% 34.8% 8.7% 100%
7 11 6 2 0
19
57.9% 31.6% 10.5% 100%
8 32 12 3 0
47
68.1% 25.5% 6.4% 100%
Total 85 43 12 1 141
60.3% 30.5% 8.5% .7% 100%
Table 6B
Individual and group meetings with my coordinator are sufficient. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 1 3 3 1 8
12.5% 37.5% 37.5% 12.5% 100%
3 4 5 4 0
13
30.8% 38.5% 30.8% 100%
4 10 6 1 1 18
55.6% 33.3% 5.6% 5.6% 100%
5 3 5 3 0
11
27.3% 45.5% 27.3% 100%
6 9 10 4 0
23
39.1% 43.5% 17.4% 100%
7 6 10 1 2 19
31.6% 52.6% 5.3% 10.5% 100%
8 23 17 4 3 47
48.9% 36.2% 8.5% 6.4% 100%
Total 58 56 20 7 141
41.1% 39.7% 14.2% 5.0% 100%
Section IV
Cross Tabulation Questions
Page 14 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 6C
My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and links them to LEAD/MEPI'S overall outcomes and objectives. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 2 3 1 1 1 8
25.0% 37.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 100%
3 4 5 3 1 0
13
30.8% 38.5% 23.1% 7.7% 100%
4 3 9 4 0
1 17
17.6% 52.9% 23.5% 5.9% 100%
5 6 5 0 0 0
11
54.5% 45.5% 100%
6 10 9 4 0 0
23
43.5% 39.1% 17.4% 100%
7 4 9 2 3 0
18
22.2% 50.0% 11.1% 16.7% 100%
8 24 16 5 1 0
46
52.2% 34.8% 10.9% 2.2% 100%
Total 55 56 19 6 2 138
39.9% 40.6% 13.8% 4.3% 1.4% 100%
Table 6D
My coordinator encourages participatory planning and implementation of activities. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 2 4 2 0 0
8
25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 100%
3 6 5 1 0
1 13
46.2% 38.5% 7.7% 7.7% 100%
4 9 7 1 0
1 18
50.0% 38.9% 5.6% 5.6% 100%
5 6 4 1 0 0
11
54.5% 36.4% 9.1% 100%
6 7 12 3 0 0
22
31.8% 54.5% 13.6% 100%
7 3 12 3 1 0
19
15.8% 63.2% 15.8% 5.3% 100%
8 27 15 5 0 0
47
57.4% 31.9% 10.6% 100%
Total 62 59 16 1 2 140
44.3% 42.1% 11.4% .7% 1.4% 100%
Page 15 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 6E
My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.g meeting deadlines, arriving on time and active class
participation). Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 1 3 4 0
8
12.5% 37.5% 50.0% 100%
3 2 7 3 1 13
15.4% 53.8% 23.1% 7.7% 100%
4 12 6 0 0
18
66.7% 33.3% 100%
5 6 5 0 0
11
54.5% 45.5% 100%
6 18 4 1 0
23
78.3% 17.4% 4.3% 100%
7 6 10 3 0
19
31.6% 52.6% 15.8% 100%
8 29 18 0 0
47
61.7% 38.3% 100%
Total 76 53 11 1 141
53.9% 37.6% 7.8% .7% 100%
Table 6F
My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among students. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 2 5 0 0
7
28.6% 71.4% 100%
3 5 5 2 1 13
38.5% 38.5% 15.4% 7.7% 100%
4 6 8 1 3 18
33.3% 44.4% 5.6% 16.7% 100%
5 5 5 1 0
11
45.5% 45.5% 9.1% 100%
6 10 5 7 1 23
43.5% 21.7% 30.4% 4.3% 100%
7 6 7 4 2 19
31.6% 36.8% 21.1% 10.5% 100%
8 26 14 4 2 46
56.5% 30.4% 8.7% 4.3% 100%
Total 62 49 19 9 139
44.6% 35.3% 13.7% 6.5% 100%
Page 16 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 6G
My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 1 5 2 0 0
8
12.5% 62.5% 25.0% 100%
3 4 7 1 1 0
13
30.8% 53.8% 7.7% 7.7% 100%
4 5 11 2 0 0
18
27.8% 61.1% 11.1% 100%
5 3 6 1 0
1 11
27.3% 54.5% 9.1% 9.1% 100%
6 7 6 6 2 2 23
30.4% 26.1% 26.1% 8.7% 8.7% 100%
7 2 8 5 4 0
19
10.5% 42.1% 26.3% 21.1% 100%
8 18 18 7 3 0
46
39.1% 39.1% 15.2% 6.5% 100%
Total 42 61 24 10 3 140
30.0% 43.6% 17.1% 7.1% 2.1% 100%
Table 6H
My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post training assignments, reflection forms
and group projects). Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 1 4 2 1 8
12.5% 50.0% 25.0% 12.5% 100%
3 5 5 2 1 13
38.5% 38.5% 15.4% 7.7% 100%
4 5 9 2 2 18
27.8% 50.0% 11.1% 11.1% 100%
5 6 3 2 0
11
54.5% 27.3% 18.2% 100%
6 10 9 3 1 23
43.5% 39.1% 13.0% 4.3% 100%
7 1 8 6 4 19
5.3% 42.1% 31.6% 21.1% 100%
8 20 15 9 2 46
43.5% 32.6% 19.6% 4.3% 100%
Total 50 53 26 11 140
35.7% 37.9% 18.6% 7.9% 100%
Page 17 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 6I
My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership and civic engagement activities in real life. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 2 4 2 0 0
8
25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 100%
3 4 2 6 1 0 13
30.8% 15.4% 46.2% 7.7% .0% 100%
4 7 5 5 0
1 18
38.9% 27.8% 27.8% 5.6% 100%
5 7 3 1 0 0
11
63.6% 27.3% 9.1% 100%
6 9 9 5 0 0
23
39.1% 39.1% 21.7% 100%
7 2 11 3 2 0
18
11.1% 61.1% 16.7% 11.1% 100%
8 27 11 4 3 1 46
58.7% 23.9% 8.7% 6.5% 2.2% 100%
Total 60 45 26 6 2 139
43.2% 32.4% 18.7% 4.3% 1.4% 100%
Table 6J
My coordinator is challenging me to use my maximum potential. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 1 5 2 0 0
8
12.5% 62.5% 25.0% 100%
3 3 5 3 2 0
13
23.1% 38.5% 23.1% 15.4% 100%
4 4 6 3 4 1 18
22.2% 33.3% 16.7% 22.2% 5.6% 100%
5 4 3 4 0 0
11
36.4% 27.3% 36.4% 100%
6 13 3 5 2 0
23
56.5% 13.0% 21.7% 8.7% 100%
7 6 5 5 2 1 19
31.6% 26.3% 26.3% 10.5% 5.3% 100%
8 22 16 6 1 2 47
46.8% 34.0% 12.8% 2.1% 4.3% 100%
Total 55 43 28 11 4 141
39.0% 30.5% 19.9% 7.8% 2.8% 100%
Page 18 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 6K
My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives support if needed.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 1 4 2 0
1 8
12.5% 50.0% 25.0% 12.5% 100%
3 4 4 3 2 0
13
30.8% 30.8% 23.1% 15.4% 100%
4 7 8 1 1 1 18
38.9% 44.4% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 100%
5 5 3 2 0
1 11
45.5% 27.3% 18.2% 9.1% 100%
6 14 6 1 1 0
22
63.6% 27.3% 4.5% 4.5% 100%
7 7 7 2 1 1 18
38.9% 38.9% 11.1% 5.6% 5.6% 100%
8 22 17 5 3 0
47
46.8% 36.2% 10.6% 6.4% 100%
Total 62 49 16 8 4 139
44.6% 35.3% 11.5% 5.8% 2.9% 100%
Page 19 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Cross tabulation question [The cohort # by the level of agreement regarding other different statements (Q.5)]
Table 7A
My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion, political beliefs, culture, etc..) Total
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 2 3 0 0 0
5
40.0% 60.0% 100%
3 9 2 2 0 0
13
69.2% 15.4% 15.4% 100%
4 8 5 2 0 0
15
53.3% 33.3% 13.3% 100%
5 3 6 1 0 0
10
30.0% 60.0% 10.0% 100%
6 9 11 1 0 0
21
42.9% 52.4% 4.8% 100%
7 8 9 1 0 0
18
44.4% 50.0% 5.6% 100%
8 19 15 7 2 1 44
43.2% 34.1% 15.9% 4.5% 2.3% 100%
Total 60 51 14 2 1 128
46.9% 39.8% 10.9% 1.6% .8% 100%
Table 7B
My coordinator encourages a two way dialogue with students. Total
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 2 2 1 0
5
40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 100%
3 7 5 1 0
13
53.8% 38.5% 7.7% 100%
4 6 8 1 0
15
40.0% 53.3% 6.7% 100%
5 4 5 1 0
10
40.0% 50.0% 10.0% 100%
6 5 11 5 0
21
23.8% 52.4% 23.8% 100%
7 6 9 2 1 18
33.3% 50.0% 11.1% 5.6% 100%
8 19 14 9 1 43
44.2% 32.6% 20.9% 2.3% 100%
Total 51 54 20 2 127
40.2% 42.5% 15.7% 1.6% 100%
Page 20 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 7C
My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freely even if I disagree with his/her
opinion. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 2 2 0 0
4
50.0% 50.0% 100%
3 9 3 1 0
13
69.2% 23.1% 7.7% 100%
4 10 3 2 0
15
66.7% 20.0% 13.3% 100%
5 4 5 1 0
10
40.0% 50.0% 10.0% 100%
6 6 12 3 0
21
28.6% 57.1% 14.3% 100%
7 5 7 5 1 18
27.8% 38.9% 27.8% 5.6% 100%
8 23 13 5 1 42
54.8% 31.0% 11.9% 2.4% 100%
Total 61 45 17 2 125
48.8% 36.0% 13.6% 1.6% 100%
Table 7D
My coordinator gives timely feedback/advice when needed. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 3 1 1 0 0
5
60.0% 20.0% 20.0% 100%
3 4 5 3 0 0
12
33.3% 41.7% 25.0% 100%
4 10 4 1 0 0
15
66.7% 26.7% 6.7% 100%
5 6 2 1 0
1 10
60.0% 20.0% 10.0% 10.0% 100%
6 11 6 3 1 0
21
52.4% 28.6% 14.3% 4.8% 100%
7 5 9 2 2 0
18
27.8% 50.0% 11.1% 11.1% 100%
8 22 12 6 3 0
43
51.2% 27.9% 14.0% 7.0% 100%
Total 63 39 17 6 1 126
50.0% 31.0% 13.5% 4.8% .8% 100%
Page 21 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 7E
My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can express myself. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 1 3 0 0 0
4
25.0% 75.0% 100%
3 7 4 2 0 0
13
53.8% 30.8% 15.4% 100%
4 11 3 1 0 0
15
73.3% 20.0% 6.7% 100%
5 6 2 2 0 0
10
60.0% 20.0% 20.0% 100%
6 9 6 6 0 0
21
42.9% 28.6% 28.6% 100%
7 4 9 4 1 0
18
22.2% 50.0% 22.2% 5.6% 100%
8 19 17 3 3 1 43
44.2% 39.5% 7.0% 7.0% 2.3% 100%
Total 59 44 18 4 1 126
46.8% 34.9% 14.3% 3.2% .8% 100%
Table 7F
My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions, (i.e. selection process, semester
abroad, etc..). Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 1 2 2 0 0
5
20.0% 40.0% 40.0% 100%
3 3 8 2 0 0
13
23.1% 61.5% 15.4% 100%
4 9 5 1 0 0
15
60.0% 33.3% 6.7% 100%
5 3 5 1 1 0
10
30.0% 50.0% 10.0% 10.0% 100%
6 8 9 3 0
1 21
38.1% 42.9% 14.3% 4.8% 100%
7 3 8 5 2 0
18
16.7% 44.4% 27.8% 11.1% 100%
8 20 13 8 1 1 43
46.5% 30.2% 18.6% 2.3% 2.3% 100%
Total 49 50 22 4 2 127
38.6% 39.4% 17.3% 3.1% 1.6% 100%
Page 22 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 7G
My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and professional growth
when needed. Total
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 1 3 1 0
5
20.0% 60.0% 20.0% 100%
3 3 5 5 0
13
23.1% 38.5% 38.5% 100%
4 6 6 3 0
15
40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 100%
5 5 4 0
1 10
50.0% 40.0% 10.0% 100%
6 10 10 0
1 21
47.6% 47.6% 4.8% 100%
7 6 8 3 1 18
33.3% 44.4% 16.7% 5.6% 100%
8 17 18 6 1 42
40.5% 42.9% 14.3% 2.4% 100%
Total 50 54 18 4 126
39.7% 42.9% 14.3% 3.2% 100%
Table 7H
My coordinator encourages participation in different learning/development opportunities. Total
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Cohort # 1 2 0 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 1 4 0 0
5
20.0% 80.0% 100%
3 6 3 3 1 13
46.2% 23.1% 23.1% 7.7% 100%
4 10 3 2 0
15
66.7% 20.0% 13.3% 100%
5 5 4 1 0
10
50.0% 40.0% 10.0% 100%
6 11 10 0 0
21
52.4% 47.6% 100%
7 3 14 1 0
18
16.7% 77.8% 5.6% 100%
8 23 15 5 0
43
53.5% 34.9% 11.6% 100%
Total 61 53 12 1 127
48.0% 41.7% 9.4% .8% 100%
Page 23 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 7I
My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values which are: integrity,
professionalism, inclusivity, student centeredness and social responsibility.
Total
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral
Cohort # 1 2 0 0
2
100% 100%
2 1 3 1 5
20.0% 60.0% 20.0% 100%
3 5 5 2 12
41.7% 41.7% 16.7% 100%
4 10 4 1 15
66.7% 26.7% 6.7% 100%
5 9 1 0
10
90.0% 10.0% 100%
6 11 10 0
21
52.4% 47.6% 100%
7 4 11 3 18
22.2% 61.1% 16.7% 100%
8 25 13 4 42
59.5% 31.0% 9.5% 100%
Total 67 47 11 125
53.6% 37.6% 8.8% 100%
Page 24 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Cross tabulation questions
[Gender by the level of agreement regarding different statements (Q.4)]
Table 8A
My coordinator has an understanding of AUC's liberal education system.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral
Strongly Disagree
Gender Male 36 16 4 1 57
63.2% 28.1% 7.0% 1.8% 100%
Female 52 29 8 0
89
58.4% 32.6% 9.0% 100%
Total 88 45 12 1 146
60.3% 30.8% 8.2% .7% 100%
Table 8B
Individual and group meetings with my coordinator are sufficient.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Gender Male 23 24 6 4 57
40.4% 42.1% 10.5% 7.0% 100%
Female 35 36 14 4 89
39.3% 40.4% 15.7% 4.5% 100%
Total 58 60 20 8 146
39.7% 41.1% 13.7% 5.5% 100%
Table 8C
My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link them to LEAD'S overall outcomes and objectives.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender Male 20 28 5 2 1 56
35.7% 50.0% 8.9% 3.6% 1.8% 100%
Female 35 33 14 4 1 87
40.2% 37.9% 16.1% 4.6% 1.1% 100%
Total 55 61 19 6 2 143
38.5% 42.7% 13.3% 4.2% 1.4% 100%
Page 25 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 8D
My coordinator encourages participatory planning and implementation of activities.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender Male 27 22 6 1 1 57
47.4% 38.6% 10.5% 1.8% 1.8% 100%
Female 37 38 10 2 1 88
42.0% 43.2% 11.4% 2.3% 1.1% 100%
Total 64 60 16 3 2 145
44.1% 41.4% 11.0% 2.1% 1.4% 100%
Table 8E
My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.g. meeting deadlines, arriving on
time and active class participation). Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Gender Male 29 23 5 0
57
50.9% 40.4% 8.8% 100%
Female 50 31 6 1 88
56.8% 35.2% 6.8% 1.1% 100%
Total 79 54 11 1 145
54.5% 37.2% 7.6% .7% 100%
Table 8F
My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among students.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Gender Male 22 23 7 4 56
39.3% 41.1% 12.5% 7.1% 100%
Female 41 26 15 6 88
46.6% 29.5% 17.0% 6.8% 100%
Total 63 49 22 10 144
43.8% 34.0% 15.3% 6.9% 100%
Page 26 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 8G
My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender Male 19 23 10 5 0
57
33.3% 40.4% 17.5% 8.8% 100%
Female 23 41 15 6 3 88
26.1% 46.6% 17.0% 6.8% 3.4% 100%
Total 42 64 25 11 3 145
29.0% 44.1% 17.2% 7.6% 2.1% 100%
Table 8H
My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post training
assignments, reflection forms and group projects). Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Gender Male 17 21 13 6 57
29.8% 36.8% 22.8% 10.5% 100%
Female 35 34 13 6 88
39.8% 38.6% 14.8% 6.8% 100%
Total 52 55 26 12 145
35.9% 37.9% 17.9% 8.3% 100%
Table 8I
My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership and civic engagement activities in real life.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender Male 24 17 10 4 1 56
42.9% 30.4% 17.9% 7.1% 1.8% 100%
Female 40 28 16 3 1 88
45.5% 31.8% 18.2% 3.4% 1.1% 100%
Total 64 45 26 7 2 144
44.4% 31.3% 18.1% 4.9% 1.4% 100%
Page 27 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 8J
My coordinator is challenging me to use my maximum potential.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender Male 25 19 5 5 3 57
43.9% 33.3% 8.8% 8.8% 5.3% 100%
Female 33 24 24 7 1 89
37.1% 27.0% 27.0% 7.9% 1.1% 100%
Total 58 43 29 12 4 146
39.7% 29.5% 19.9% 8.2% 2.7% 100%
Table 8K
My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives support if needed.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender Male 27 21 4 4 1 57
47.4% 36.8% 7.0% 7.0% 1.8% 100%
Female 38 30 12 4 3 87
43.7% 34.5% 13.8% 4.6% 3.4% 100%
Total 65 51 16 8 4 144
45.1% 35.4% 11.1% 5.6% 2.8% 100%
Page 28 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Cross tabulation question [Gender by the level of agreement regarding other different statements (Q.5)]
Table 9A
My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion, political beliefs, culture, etc..)
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender Male 26 23 3 1 0
53
49.1% 43.4% 5.7% 1.9% 100%
Female 34 30 12 2 1 79
43.0% 38.0% 15.2% 2.5% 1.3% 100%
Total 60 53 15 3 1 132
45.5% 40.2% 11.4% 2.3% .8% 100%
Table 9B
My coordinator encourages a two way dialogue with students.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Gender Male 21 23 7 2 53
39.6% 43.4% 13.2% 3.8% 100%
Female 30 32 15 1 78
38.5% 41.0% 19.2% 1.3% 100%
Total 51 55 22 3 131
38.9% 42.0% 16.8% 2.3% 100%
Table 9C
My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freely even if I disagree with his/her
opinion. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Gender Male 26 17 7 2 52
50.0% 32.7% 13.5% 3.8% 100%
Female 35 29 12 1 77
45.5% 37.7% 15.6% 1.3% 100%
Total 61 46 19 3 129
47.3% 35.7% 14.7% 2.3% 100%
Page 29 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 9D
My coordinator gives timely feedback/advice when needed. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender Male 23 17 10 1 0
51
45.1% 33.3% 19.6% 2.0% 100%
Female 41 22 8 6 1 78
52.6% 28.2% 10.3% 7.7% 1.3% 100%
Total 64 39 18 7 1 129
49.6% 30.2% 14.0% 5.4% .8% 100%
Table 9E
My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can express myself.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender Male 22 19 10 1 1 53
41.5% 35.8% 18.9% 1.9% 1.9% 100%
Female 38 25 10 3 1 77
49.4% 32.5% 13.0% 3.9% 1.3% 100%
Total 60 44 20 4 2 130
46.2% 33.8% 15.4% 3.1% 1.5% 100%
Table 9F
My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions, (i.e. selection process, semester abroad,
etc..). Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender Male 17 23 10 2 1 53
32.1% 43.4% 18.9% 3.8% 1.9% 100%
Female 34 27 14 2 1 78
43.6% 34.6% 17.9% 2.6% 1.3% 100%
Total 51 50 24 4 2 131
38.9% 38.2% 18.3% 3.1% 1.5% 100%
Page 30 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 9G
My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and professional growth
when needed. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Gender Male 21 22 7 3 53
39.6% 41.5% 13.2% 5.7% 100%
Female 30 33 11 3 77
39.0% 42.9% 14.3% 3.9% 100%
Total 51 55 18 6 130
39.2% 42.3% 13.8% 4.6% 100%
Table 9H
My coordinator encourages participation in different learning/development opportunities.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Gender Male 26 21 6 0
53
49.1% 39.6% 11.3% 100%
Female 36 33 8 1 78
46.2% 42.3% 10.3% 1.3% 100%
Total 62 54 14 1 131
47.3% 41.2% 10.7% .8% 100%
Table 9I
My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values
which are: integrity, professionalism, inclusivity, student centeredness and
social responsibility. Total
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral
Gender Male 26 22 5 53
49.1% 41.5% 9.4% 100%
Female 41 27 8 76
53.9% 35.5% 10.5% 100%
Total 67 49 13 129
51.9% 38.0% 10.1% 100%
Page 31 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Cross tabulation questions “Gender” by the question “Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with
equality?”
Table 10
Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality? Total
Yes No
Gender Male
45 8 53
84.9% 15.1% 100%
Female 73 6 79
92.4% 7.6% 100%
Total 118 14 132
89.4% 10.6% 100%
“Cohort #” by the question “Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality?”
Table 11
Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality? Total
Yes No
Cohort # 1 2 0
2
100% 100%
2 5 0
5
100% 100%
3 13 0
13
100% 100%
4 15 0
15
100% 100%
5 9 1 10
90.0% 10.0% 100%
6 14 7 21
66.7% 33.3% 100%
7 16 2 18
88.9% 11.1% 100%
8 41 3 44
93.2% 6.8% 100%
Total 115 13 128
89.8% 10.2% 100%
Page 32 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Q. 7: Please suggest any areas for improvement:
1. Conference planning and execution
2. change vouchers system
3. clarify the objectives of the program more"
4. I suggest that we do more round table discussions and internships which has to do with improving the
situation in the MENA.
5. * More feedback from us
* A space of freedom. Actually, it is not only the coordinator's fault, but the whole system. I think we
should go on, experiment this atmosphere, and face everything. What is going on is that we are gathered
for every small detail which, in my opinion, isolates us and hinders us from better communication."
6. Decrease the number of meetings and try to treat all of us equally.
7. There are many things that we as MEPI students can achieve if we work together with the available
resources, but we do not do so at all. This semester we didn't have a project and we didn't do many round
table discussions or trainings, although I do not like the round table discussions because I find them
useless. I believe that we have so much potential and that we can be making radical change in the society,
and we have been discussing this with our coordinator. Also many issues that we brought to the
coordinator and to the other heads such as the LPI, we have been discussing them in meetings,
nevertheless we do not see any real change and I feel like the meetings are pointless and repetitive since
we have already discussed what it that we do not like about the LPI is. Another issue that I have been
bringing to the coordinator since the beginning of the semester but we have not been giving any feedback
is the money, the 400dollars that we get monthly is not enough to survive in a community such as AUC,
and knowing that most of us live in the New campus which is far away from everything we spend a lot of
money on transportation because although there are buses they do not operate all the time.
8. I would like for our demands to be understood and for us to be given a chance to express what we want
and to see real change, we have been chosen to be the leaders of tomorrow but inside our program we
are not allowed to do so."
9. I think, if she is gonna treat some people as her close friends, she should do it outside the office...or she
treats all of us as her close friends, accepts us anytime in her office, accepts our phone calls to her
anytime, accepts us being late "without excuses" sometimes as it happens with some people but others
10. Leadership, Negotiation, Communication.
11. find my coordinator an administrative assistant to do the administrative work and the coordinator to have
more time for coaching instead of doing official work
12. I've heard that some people are suggesting the exchange of coordinators; I strongly disagree with this
suggestion for several reasons. The most important one is I DO NOT WANT my coordinator Sarah El.
Nashar to be replaced with any other coordinator as she's very helpful, lovely and she's the only one that
would understand us and give us the correct feedback and the support we need.
13. maybe more roundtables and workshops
14. I think that I need a more constructive feedback about our activities and developing personalities
15. I believe she should ask more for feedback on her performance
Section V
Page 33 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
16. Our coordinator is really good, can't think of anything
17. removal of the LPI because to be honest i think if each of us concentrated on his/her own vision that
would be much more efficient than our scattered efforts in community service clubs that may or may not
be part of the final vision of the student and after all time is money.
18. Giving more training to coordinators about different fields and how they should deal with the student’s
issues.......
19. The interaction between our cohorts is very law. I mean we do not see each other very often unless we
have a roundtable discussion or such a thing. However we should have more work to do together even if
they were home assignments or group projects, so that we get to interact with each other.
20. The way finances are handled: more commitment to MEPI's financial problems (not the stipend but other
things such as refunds, mistakes in the payments handled by the Accounting Office)
Assistance with course registration: inexistent. A very important aspect that needs to be looked at"
Q.8: Other comments:
Negative Comment:
When she asks us to be on time ""arriving on time""... I think she has to let us leave on time as well, but
what always happens is that we start on time , but we ""never ever"" leave on time ...she always takes, at
least, extra one hour and half.
- Sometimes, she cannot handle the session and cannot stop some people from talking and
fighting together during the meetings which waste our time! ...and it's not our sin to carry their
faults and stay extra OBLIGATORY time
- Finally, about the retreat, most of us "including me for sure" ignoring the idea of travelling 25
hours ""toward and backward from"" Aswan by train, although we are taking the budget of two
retreats in one. Plus, when we talked to her about that in a meeting, she didn't solve the problem
and she did what she already decided to do before the meeting.
The rule of the coordinator is not only to grade us, but to also tell us ways of improvement and opening
our minds to other diverse activities we could do
I have to say that the fact that many of the LEAD events are mandatory isn't a good idea, especially that
many of them are simply pointless and completely useless
Positive Comments:
I really respect my coordinator and I'm lucky to have her :)
My coordinator, Janine, is so professional, she understands very well what she has to do and she does it
the right way. If it was not for her, I, myself, would not be in my position now. She succeeded to be a role
model for most of our cohort.
Page 34 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
General comments:
We want to evaluate other LEAD crew on top of them Ms Sohair Saad.
Because of the increasing costs of living, I believe that achieving the goals that mepis are required to
realize is a hard task especially with the low monthly allowance that we are receiving.
I feel overloaded by the lead requirements. I want to go on both AUC's academic life and AUC'S activities
by myself.
"LEAD 8 students want to change vouchers system and take cash money instead.
Thanks"
Nothing
I had some problems when I was studying abroad.
Taking our academic load into consideration when designing MEPI activities for the semester because
some of us have a vision of going into academia in the future and of course academic performance
matters.
Recommended