View
5
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Terminal Evaluation ReportFor
the Project for Enhancement ofthe Disaster Management Capacity of
National Disaster Management Authority(BNPB) and
Regional Disaster Management Authority(BPBD)
in Indonesia
April, 2015
GEJR
15-132
Japan International Cooperation Agency JICA
Terminal Evaluation ReportFor
the Project for Enhancement ofthe Disaster Management Capacity of
National Disaster Management Authority(BNPB) and
Regional Disaster Management Authority(BPBD)
in Indonesia
April, 2015
Japan International Cooperation Agency JICA
Abbreviations
AIFDR Australia-Indonesia Facility for Disaster Reduction AusAID Australian Agency for International Development AVS30 Averaged Velocity of S-wave in shallow depth until 30 m APBD (Anggaran Pendapatan & Belanja Daerah) Regional Income and Expenditure
Budget BAPPEDA (Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah) Regional Development Planning
Agency BAPPENAS (Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional) National Development Planning
Agency BMKG (Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika) Meteorological, Climatological
and Geophysical AgencyBNPB (Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana) National Disaster Management
Agency BPBD (Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah) Regional Disaster Management
Agency BPK-BMD (Badan Pengelola Keuangan dan Barang Milik Daerah) Agency for Financial
Management and Assets BPKP (Baden Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan) Financial and Development
Supervisory Board BPPT (Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi) Agency for the Assessment and
Application of Technology CBDRM Community-Based Disaster Risk Management CPX Command Post Exercise CVGHM Indonesian Center for Volcanology and Geologic Hazard Mitigation DIBI (Data & Information Bencana Indonesia), Indonesia Disaster Data & InformationDFID Department For International Development DIG Disaster Imagination Game DPA (Dokumen Pelaksanaan Anggaran) Budget Implementation Document DRR Disaster Risk Reduction FGD Focus Group Discussion GIS Geographic Information System GIZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit) German Society for
International CooperationHFA Hyogo Framework for Action IDR Indonesian Rupiah Ina-DRTG Indonesia Disaster Relief Training Ground IOM International Organization for Migration IPDN (Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri) Institute for Civil Servant School JCC Joint Coordinating Committee JICA Japan International Coordination Agency JPY Japanese Yen LIPI (Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia) Indonesian Institute of Sciences MLIT Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism M/M Minutes of Meeting MoU Memorandum of Understanding MUSRENBANG (Musyawarah Rencana Pembangunan) Discussion for Development Planning NGO Nongovernmental Organization NTB (Nusa Tenggara Barat) West Nusa Tenggara NZ-UGM New Zealand – (Universitas Gadjah Mada) OECD-DAC Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development - Development
Assistance Committee
PDM Project Design Matrix PKK (Pemberdayaan Kesejahteraan Keluarga) Organization for Empowering the
Family Welfare. PPKK Pusat Penanggulangan Krisis Kesehatan – Ministry of Health, Centre for Health
Crisis Management PMI (Palang Merah Indonesia) Indonesian Red Cross PU (Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum) Ministry of Public Works PVMBG (Pusat Vulkanologi dan Mitigasi Bencana Geologi) Centre of Volcanology and
Mitigation of Geological DisasterRANPRB (Rencana Nasional Pengurangan Risiko Bencana) National Plan of Disaster
Risk Reduction R/D Record of Discussion RDMP Regional Disaster Management Plan RISTEK (Kementerian Riset Dan Teknologi) Ministry of State for Research and
Technology RENSTRA (Rencana Strategis) Strategic Plan – 5 years RKPD (Rencana Kerja Pemerintah Daerah) Local Government Annual Working Plan RPJMD (Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah) Regional Mid-Term
Development Plan RPJMN (Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional) National Medium-term
Development Plan SEKDA (Sekretaris Daerah) Regional Secretary SCDRR Safer Community through Disaster Risk Reduction SFDRR Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction SIBAT (Siaga Bencana Berbasis Masyarakat) Community Based Disaster Preparedness SIMDA (Sistem Informasi Manajemen Keuangan Daerah) Management Information
System of Local Government Finance SKPD (Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah) Local Government Agency SULUT (Sulawesi Utara) North Sulawesi SOP Standard Operation Procedure TAGANA (Taruna Siaga Bencana) Youth Group for Disaster Preparedness TNI (Tentara Nasional Indonesia) Indonesian Armed Forces TTX Table Top Exercise UNDP United Nations Development Program WCDRR UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015 Sendai, Japan
Table of Contents Abbreviations Table of Contents Terminal Evaluation Summary Sheet
Chapter 1: Outline of the Joint Terminal Evaluation ................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives of the Terminal Evaluation ........................................................................................... 2 1.3 Outline of the Project ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Member of the Evaluation Team .................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Schedule of the Terminal Evaluation ............................................................................................. 4 1.6 Methodology of the Terminal Evaluation ...................................................................................... 4
Chapter 2: Achievement of the Project .................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Results of Input .............................................................................................................................. 5
2.1.1 Dispatch of Japanese Experts ................................................................................................. 5 2.1.2 Provision of Equipment .......................................................................................................... 5 2.1.3 Counterpart Training .............................................................................................................. 5 2.1.4 Local Cost ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.5 Assignment of Counterpart Personnel .................................................................................... 6 2.1.6 Operation Budget ................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.7 Project facilities ...................................................................................................................... 7
2.2 Progress in Achieving Expected Outputs ....................................................................................... 7 2.2.1 Output 1: Disaster Data and Information (SULUT) ............................................................... 8 2.2.2 Output 2: Hazard and Risk Maps (SULUT, NTB) ................................................................. 8 2.2.3 Output 3-1: Regional Disaster Management Plan and Action Plan (SULUT, NTB) .............. 9 2.2.4 Output 3-2: SOP and Contingency Plan (SULUT) ................................................................. 9 2.2.5 utput 4-1: Disaster Management Drill and Exercise (SULUT) .............................................. 9 2.2.6 Output 4-2: Community-based Disaster Risk Management (SULUT, NTB) ....................... 10 2.2.7 Output 5: Dissemination of RDMP technical guideline ....................................................... 10 2.2.8 Achievement of Output Indicators ....................................................................................... 10
2.3 Prospect of Achieving the Project Purpose .................................................................................. 12 2.3.1 Progress towards the Project Purpose ................................................................................... 12 2.3.2 Achievement of Project Purpose Indicator ........................................................................... 12
2.4 Implementation Process ............................................................................................................... 13
Chapter 3: Review by the Five Criteria .................................................................................................. 15 3.1 Relevance ..................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Effectiveness ................................................................................................................................ 17 3.3 Efficiency ..................................................................................................................................... 24 3.4 Impacts ......................................................................................................................................... 27 3.5 Sustainability ................................................................................................................................ 28
Chapter 4: Recommendation .................................................................................................................. 31 4.1 Conclusion of the Review by the Five Criteria ............................................................................ 31 4.2 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 31
4.2.1 Completion of all project activities. ..................................................................................... 31 4.2.2 Promotion and implementation of regency/municipality RDMP ......................................... 32 4.2.3 Discussion with BNPB on the way-forward to the Overall Goal ......................................... 32
4.3 Lessons Learned ........................................................................................................................... 33
Appendices A.1 PDM Ver.2 .................................................................................................................. A-1 A.2 Plan of Operation Ver.2 ............................................................................................. A-3 A.3 Schedule of the Terminal Evaluation .......................................................................... A-4 A.4 List of Interviewees .................................................................................................... A-5 A.5 Dispatch of Japanese Experts ..................................................................................... A-6 A.6 Provision of Equipment .............................................................................................. A-8 A.7 Counterpart Training ................................................................................................... A-9 A.8 Assignment of Counterpart Personnel ...................................................................... A-10 A.9 Operation Budget ...................................................................................................... A-20 A.10 Result Grid (Achievement of Indicators) .................................................................. A-21 A.11 List of Documents developed in the Project ............................................................. A-28 A.12 Evaluation Grid (Information and Data for the 5 Criteria) ....................................... A-29 A.13 Signed Minutes of Meeting ....................................................................................... A-33
i
Terminal Evaluation Summary Sheet 1 Outline of the Project Country: Republic of Indonesia Project Title: the Project for Enhancement of the Disaster
Management Capacity of National Authority for Disaster Management (BNPB) and Regional Agency for Disaster Management (BPBD) in Indonesia
Thematic Area : Disaster Management Division in Charge: Disaster Management Team
II, Global Environment Department, JICA Cooperation Scheme: Technical Cooperation
Project Period: November 2011~November 2015
Total Cost: 460 Million JPY (4 years)
Supporting Organization in Japan: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan Meteorological Agency, Kagoshima Prefecture, Ishinomaki City, Sumida Ward Government, etc.
Counterpart Agency: National Disaster Management Authority (BNPB), Regional Disaster Management Agencies (BPBDs) of North Sulawesi and West Nusa Tenggara Province, and the regency/municipality BPBDs in the target provinces.
1.1 Background of the Project Indonesia is a country prone to natural hazard. Geographically Indonesia is situated in the tropical zone
that has two seasons: the dry season and rainy season. Drought and forest/land fire occur in the dry season, while inundation/flooding caused by heavy rain frequently occur in the rainy season. The country is also situated at the meeting points of the Pacific plate, Euro Asian plate, and Indo Australian plate, thus facing disasters caused by earthquake, tsunami, and volcanic eruption. Recent disasters with substantial casualties include the Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami in December 2004, the Central Java earthquake in May 2006, the Padang earthquake in September 2009, eruption of Mount Merapi and the Mentawai island tsunami in September 2010.
Under the circumstances, the government of Indonesia enacted the Law No. 24 on Disaster Management in 2007 and established BNPB in 2008 to strengthen its disaster risk management capacities. At the same time, the government of Indonesia requested the government of Japan to formulate a comprehensive disaster management plan at the national and local level as well as to enhance capacities for natural disaster risk management. In response to the request, JICA implemented the Study on Natural Disaster Management in Indonesia from March 2007 to March 2009. Through this Study, a system for disaster management at national and local levels was determined. BNPB, however, was established only recently and doesn’t have enough capacities such as organizational structure, budget, skills, and knowhow, thus having difficulty in providing proper guidance and support to establish BPBDs and to formulate a Regional Disaster Management Plan (RDMP). Moreover, strengthening the capacity of BPBD is an urgent issue to improve the overall disaster risk management of Indonesia. Against this background, the Record of Discussions (R/D) was signed between BNPB and JICA on 11 July 2011 for the implementation of the Project for Enhancement of the Disaster Management Capacity of National Authority for Disaster Management (BNPB) and Regional Agency for Disaster Management (BPBD) in Indonesia (hereinafter referred to as “the Project”).
The Project started in November 2011 with BNPB, North Sulawesi Provincial BPBD and all the regency/municipality BPBDs in the province as counterparts, aiming at the enhancement of the disaster management capacity of these counterpart agencies. In August 2013, at the halfway point of the implementation period, the Project underwent the mid-term review. In March 2014, the activities in the North Sulawesi Province (SULUT) as the 1st target province was completed and those in the West Nusa Tenggara Province (NTB) as the 2nd target province started in June 2014. In compliance with the provision of the R/D, JICA and Indonesian authorities concerned are jointly to conduct the terminal evaluation of the Project in April 2015, six months before the expiry of the four-year cooperation period of the Project, November 2015.
1.2 Project Overview 1) Overall Goal
The provincial BPBD as well as the regency/municipality BPBDs beside the target areas are established, and the disaster management capacities of them are enhanced by using materials formulated and methodology established in the Project.
2) Project Purpose The disaster management capacities of BNPB, the provincial BPBDs, and the regency/municipality BPBDs in
ii
the target area are enhanced. 3) Output
1. The capacity for the regency/municipality BPBDs to accumulate disaster data/information which are fundamental for disaster risk management and improve accuracy of such data/information in the target area is enhanced.
2. The capacity for creation of hazard and risk maps at regency/municipality level in the target area is enhanced.
3. The capacity for formulation of regional disaster management plans for regency/municipality in the target area is enhanced.
4. The capacity for conducting disaster management exercises at the regency/municipality in the target area is enhanced.
5. Nationwide dissemination activities are implemented. 4) Inputs (at the time of terminal evaluation) (Japanese Side) ・Expert: 18 short-term experts (from November 2011 to April 2015) ・Provision of Equipment: office equipment, satellite image, elevation data, GIS software and plotter, etc. ・Counterpart Training : 2 times (August - September 2012, and August 2014) ・Local Cost: 64.3 million JPY (July 2011 - March 2015) including equipment, training and miscellaneous.
(Indonesian Side) ・ Counterpart: Project Director (Deputy Chief for Prevention and Preparedness, BNPB), four Project
Managers and staff (BNPB), staff of North Sulawesi Province BPBD and the 15 regency/municipality BPBDs in the province, as well as West Nusa Tenggara Province BPBD and the 10 regency/municipality BPBDs in the province.
・Counter Budget: Counterpart agencies use their recurrent operational budgets for project activities. 2 Joint Evaluation Team Member of the Joint Evaluation Team
1. Dr. Raditya Jati 2. Eiji Otsuki 3. Takafumi Shinya 4. Shintaro Akiyama 5. Shusuke Irabu 6. Hiroyuki Okuda
Deputy Director for Disaster Prevention, BNPB Senior Advisor to Director General, Global Environment Dept., JICA JICA Expert (Jakarta) Advisor, Disaster Management Team 2, Global Environment Dept., JICADisaster Management Team 2, Global Environment Dept., JICA Tekizaitekisho LLC
Evaluation Period
5 April 2015~25 April 2015 Type of Evaluation:Terminal Evaluation
3 Project Performance 3.1 Progress in Achieving Expected Outputs 1) Output 1 ・ Based on the Head of BNPB Regulation No.8/2011 (Standardization of Disaster Data), five data formats to
accumulate and share necessary disaster data was developed through workshops with provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT. “Technical Guideline for Collecting and Storing Disaster Data/Information” was finalized, including the five formats above.
2) Output 2 ・ In accordance with the multi-hazard risk assessment methodologies prescribed by the Head of BNPB
Regulation No.2/2012 (General Guideline of Disaster Risk Assessment for Disaster Management Planning), hazard and risk maps for all the 15 regencies/cities in SULUT were created on 9 hazards (Flood, Flashflood, Landslides, Extreme Weather, Drought, Forest Fire, Earthquake, Tsunami, and Volcanic Eruption). In the course of the activities, “Technical Guideline for Creation of Hazard Map for Regencies/Municipalities” was developed. Same activities for creating hazard and risk maps are being implemented in NTB at present.
3) Output 3 ・ Based on the Head of BNPB Regulation No.4/2008 (Guideline for Formulation of the Disaster Management
Plan), RDMPs were formulated at the targeted 14 regencies/municipalities in SULUT through a series of workshop conducted by the Project. All the RDMPs were approved by the head of BPBD in SULUT by November 2014. In parallel with the development of RDMPs, “Technical Guideline of Regional Disaster
iii
Management Plan for Kabupaten/Kota” was developed. Same activities for formulating RDMPs are being implemented in NTB at present.
・ “Technical Guideline for Formulation of SOP (Standard Operation Procedure)” was finalized through a series of workshop with provincial and regency/municipality SULUT. In the activities, “SOP Kabupaten Kepulauan Sitaro for Facing Disaster Volcano Karangetang” was completed.
4) Output 4 ・ Total 15 disaster management exercise such as TTX (Table Top Exercise) and CPX (Command Post
Exercise) were conducted at provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT. At the end of the activities, “Technical Guideline for Disaster Relief Exercise” was finalized.
・ Activities on CBDRM (community-based disaster risk management) were implemented at two pilot villages in SULUT: Desa Moyag in Kotamobagu, and Kelurahan Bebali in Sitaro, including training workshops and the preparation of village disaster management plans and hazard maps. At the end of CBDRM activities in SULUT, “Activities for Disaster Resilient Village Program – As a Good Practice Model” was developed. Same activities on CBDRM are being implemented at one pilot village in NTB (Desa Kuta in Central Lombok regency) at present, including the tsunami evacuation drill conducted on 18 April 2015.
5) Output 5 ・ Three activities for the dissemination of RDMP Technical Guideline has so far been conducted: presentation
at side events of large-scale disaster management drill at Padang in Sumatera Barat (19 March 2014), presentation and panel discussion at the annual BNPB general meeting (14 October 2014), and technical training for 30 BNPB officers at Ina-DTRG (Indonesia Disaster Relief Training Ground) at Sentul (8-9 January 2015).
6) Achievement of Output Indicators The level of achievement is assessed based on the set indicators in the PDM (Project Design Matrix). Among
the 8 indicators set at the output level, the Project so far has achieved 3 indicators, partially achieved 4 indicators, and has yet to achieve 1 indicator. Four indicators are partially achieved at present because relevant activities are still ongoing for Output 2 (Hazard and Risk Maps), Output 3-1 (RDMP), and Output 4-2 (CBDRM) in NTB, as well for Output 5 (Dissemination of RDMP Technical Guideline) in the central government of BNPB. There is one indicator (i.e. technical guideline for formulation of RDMP is utilized as reference documents of BNPB), which is yet to be achieved. This is because the technical guideline is yet to be completed and is to be approved through due process in BNPB before it is utilized as referential documents. These activities are being implemented as planned without delay at present, and all the indicators are expected to be achieved by the end of the Project, November 2015.
3.2 Prospect of Achieving the Project Purpose Regarding the two project purpose indicators, they are only partially achieved at present because the
activities are still ongoing in the 2nd pilot province of NTB. Indicator 1 of the Project Purpose is expected to be achieved at the end of the Project when RDMPs in NTB are all finalized and approved by the head of BPBDs while all the RDMPs developed in SULUT were already approved by November 2014. Indicator 2 of the Project Purpose concerns voluntary activities within the target areas. With the interview during the terminal evaluation (not all regency/municipality BPBDs were interviewed), at least six voluntary activities in SULUT were noted (e.g. one evacuation drill in October 2013 organized by BPBD SULUT, another in May 2014 conducted by BPBD Bitung, and another in January 2015 conducted by BPBD Manado). With NTB counterpart being actively involved in the Project at present, similar voluntary activities can also be expected in NTB in future.
4 Review Based on the Five Evaluation Criteria 4.1 Relevance The relevance of the Project is high. 1) The new government has recently passed the new Middle-Term National Development Plan (RPJMN)
2015-2019, which puts emphasis on enhancing the country’s political sovereignty and independence in economy and culture. RPJMN specifically refers to issues related to DRR (disaster risk reduction) such as the improvement of the quality of the environment, and the management of natural disaster mitigation and climate change. In accordance with the RPJMN, National Disaster Management Plan (2015-2019) is currently being developed.
2) The relevance of the Project to the DRR policy in Indonesia remains high from the initial planning survey in
iv
2011 through the mid-term review in 2013. Since its beginning in 2011, the Project continues to adjust its outputs and activities in accordance with the Head of BNPB regulations that have been issued one after another. Accordingly, the Project has sustained its relevance throughout the cooperation period.
3) The selection of SULUT and NTB as target provinces is appropriate in that the Project meets the needs and expectations of counterpart agencies (provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs) that require capacity development to better prepare and respond to natural disasters.
4) The Project is aligned with the cooperation policy of Japan such as the Development Cooperation Charter decided by the Japanese Cabinet in February 2015, and Japan’s County Assistance Policy for Indonesia dated April 2012. Japan has also renewed its commitment to international cooperation on DRR under the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015-20130) adopted on 18 March 2015.
4.2 Effectiveness The effectiveness of the Project is high. 1) The project is assessed as effective mainly because its activities are delivering the expected outputs as
planned toward achieving the Project Purpose. Currently, the Project is making a firm progress at each output in the 2nd target province of NTB, covering all the 10 regency/municipality BPBDs. By continuing the current activities, the Project is more likely to attain its goal by the end of project period, November 2015.
2) There has been significant capacity development of the provincial/regency/municipal BPBDs at the individual level through working with the processes of project implementation. Through a series of workshop and technical follow-up, regency/municipality BPBD officers have gained knowledge on the comprehensive approach to DRR (prevention and preparedness, emergency response, recovery and reconstruction) and specific measures to be taken at each phase, acquired skills on disaster risk assessment, and eventually demonstrated what they had learned by formulating RDMPs for themselves. More importantly, BPBD officers have recognized their role/responsibility as the local DRR management agency, which leads to higher motivation to work.
3) Tangible outputs such as RDMPs, hazard maps, and various technical guidelines has enhanced BPBD’s capacity at the organizational level in that BPBDs are now equipped with plans and procedures as well as referential materials. Also, they have become more capable of preparing the budget; the list of activities included in RDMP helps BPBD to prepare RKPD (annual working plan) and then DPA (budget implementation document) in the local government. For example, BPBD Bitung has successfully raised the budget for DRR since 2013. This is attributed to the BPBD Bitung actively communicating with relevant stakeholders such as the local parliament, the mayor, BPKP (provincial local government auditor), and other local government agencies/department on RDMP, and then establishing effective working relationship with them. This is one example where the capacity development has taken place at the institutional level, not only confined to an organization or some individuals.
4) With such active efforts of regency/municipality BPBD, the budget of some BPBDs has actually been increased. At present, MoHA (Ministry of Home Affairs) administering local government, is intending to strengthen DRR activities of the local government with new legislation. Now DRR has become an obligation of local government with the Law No.23-2014. Furthermore, MoHA ministerial regulation No.27-2014 explains what is DRR (e.g. evacuation, emergency response), thus prompting the local government to prepare budget for DRR activities.
5) The hazard and risk map, the first official map of its kind at regency/municipality level in the target provinces, are widely appreciated by BPBDs. BPBDs shared the developed maps with other relevant agencies such as PU (Ministry of Public Works), TNI (Indonesian Armed Forces), PVMBG (Center of Volcanology and Mitigation of Geological Disaster), and BMKG (Meteorological, Climatological and Geophysical Agency). It has been a concern how the creation of hazard map with GIS (Geographic Information System) equipment would be sustained by the provincial BPBD since the work had been mainly conducted by GIS engineers contracted by the Project. When activities in SULUT were completed in March 2014, the GIS equipment was handed over to the BPBD SULUT dated in March 2014.
4.3 Efficiency The efficiency of the Project to date is high. 1) The Project has been implemented without encountering major obstacles (such as described in the Important
Assumptions in PDM), and has been undertaken efficiently in general. Official and daily communication among project team and counterpart has been good. JCC (Joint Coordinating Committee) has been held 4
v
times. The project team was based in the target province (at Manado City in SULUT and Mataram City in NTB), but efforts of the team to visit or stay in Jakarta for reporting and consulting with BNPB regularly have kept the Project Managers at BNPB well informed.
2) Counterpart training in Japan (September 2012 and August 2014) can be highlighted as particularly effective to inspire counterpart. There were many positive remarks by those who had participated in the training, saying that the training was eye-opening, having them conscious about disaster prevention and preparedness for the first time, and having them realized how much communities/residents could do for themselves for disaster management.
4.4 Impact The impact of the Project is medium. 1) A key positive impact, which is the progress towards achieving the Overall Goal - disaster management
capacities of provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs beside the target areas are enhanced - has not really been observed as yet at the time of terminal evaluation. So far, the Project has been quite successful within the target province of SULUT and NTB, but impact beyond the target province is yet to be realized.
2) Output 5 (dissemination of technical guideline on RDMP formulation) was added to PDM to bridge between the Project Purpose and the Overall Goal at the time of Mid-term review. BNPB highly regarded the outputs of the Project and confirmed that they would disseminate the outputs to other provinces once they were finalized and approved. With such confirmation of BNPB, it is expected that activities of Output 5 will bring about more impact during the remaining project period. Furthermore, the Project is aligned and concurrent with BNPB’s initiatives and activities (e.g. formulation of RDMP at regency/municipality level, Disaster Resilient Village Program, etc), and hence can cause many positive impacts in future.
4.5 Sustainability The prospect of sustainability of the Project is high with precondition.
1) With regard to BPBDs surveyed in the terminal evaluation in SULUT and NTB (two provincial BPBDs and regency/municipality BPBDs in Bitung, Tomohon, Manado, Central Lombok, East Lombok, Mataram), the prospect of sustainability is high. Through the Project, the capacity of some BPBDs is enhanced at not only the individual or organizational level, but also at the institutional level. However, it will vary for other regency/municipality BPBDs in accordance with the current level of their capacity. Also, it should be noted that such prospect of sustainability may vary with different leadership, willingness of the government, and governing the risk at local levels are very challenging. With such precondition, the analysis and prospect of sustainability from four viewpoint (institutional, technical, human resources, and financial) are as follows.
2) Institutional viewpoint: The national and international policy environments are instrumental in promoting DRR and extending project benefits/activities. The statement at WCDRR (UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction) by the vice-president of Indonesia in March 2015 maintains that Indonesia has been investing in disaster prevention, mitigation, and preparedness and that it is now becoming their top list priority. The RPJMN (2015-2019) puts high priority to DRR as public investment. The National Disaster Management Plan (2015-2019), currently being prepared to align with the RPJMN, is expected to have specific targets such as reducing existing risk and preventing new disaster risks. As such, the institutional and regulatory framework for DRR in Indonesia has been increasingly strengthened. This includes BNPB regulations and particularly MoHA regulations for regency/municipality BPBDs.
3) Technical viewpoint: Activities in outputs such as the development of RDMPs are more likely to be sustained as these RDMPs are formulated by regency/municipality BPBD staff themselves. BPBD’s application of enhanced capacities is realized as voluntary disaster management exercises, coordinated response to natural disaster events, and effective budget preparation. All of these can indicate project outputs/benefit expected to be sustained. How the activities of creating and revising hazard and risk maps with GIS equipment continue to be a concern. Some agencies such as BAPPEDA (Regional Development Planning Agency), PU, and Sam Ratulangi University are likely to have better GIS technical capacities than BPBD SULUT. The data on disaster risk assessment for GIS can be shared with these institutions towards possible collaboration on creating or revising hazard maps in future.
4) Human Resources viewpoint: The capacity of BPBD counterpart has been remarkably increased through the Project. Continuous involvement, after the Project, of BPBD counterpart in the same DRR activities cannot be counted on because transfer of BPBD staff is common. However, clarification of duty/tasks of BPBD, increased understanding and awareness of staff on DRR in general, and development of basic referential
vi
materials such as RDMP have all contributed to the increased sustainability of BPBD human resource as a whole.
5) Financial viewpoint: The sustainability from financial viewpoint is rather promising for BPBDs. MoHA has prepared the Law No.23-2014 and the ministerial regulation No.27-2014, thereby enforcing the local government to promote DRR activities with budget. Furthermore, MoHA is considering another ministerial regulation, within this year, to secure the preparation of budget for DRR in the local government financial information management system, SIMDA.
4.6 Factors that have promoted or hindered the implementation of project 1) Promoting factors
Contribution of the local consultants in the project team is significant and highly commended by Japanese experts and by counterparts. Working with 2 provincial BPBDs and all the 15 and 10 regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT and NTB, respectively, in close cooperation with BNPB in Jakarta, requires lots of efforts for communication, consultation and follow-up. The number of counterparts reaches almost 400 (31 from BNPB, 246 from BPBDs in SULUT and 115 from BPBDs in NTB), and keeping all the counterparts informed of and engaged in project activities would not be possible without dedicated efforts of the local consultants.
2) Hindering factors One notable hindering factor mentioned is the frequent transfer of counterpart, though this hasn’t
significantly affected the project implementation. Project Director changed twice due to the transfer of the Deputy of Prevention and Preparedness BNPB (August 2013 and October 2014). At provincial/regency/municipal BPBDs in SULUT, there were many transfers of BPBD directors, too. Additional explanation of tasks to successors was necessary, and attention was paid so that the involvement of staff in the Project would be consistent.
5 Results of the Terminal Evaluation 5.1 Conclusion
The relevance of the Project remains high, aligned with government policies on DRR such as the Law No.24-2007, RPJMN (2015-2019), and relevant BNPB’s regulations though the National Disaster Management Plan (2015-2019) is still under finalization. The effectiveness of the Project is high because the Project is making a firm progress, and by continuing the current activities as planned, it is more likely that the Project Purpose will be achieved by the end of cooperation period, November 2015. The efficiency of the Project is assessed also high as the Project has not encountered major obstacle that could seriously hinder the project implementation. The impact of the Project is medium at present. Advancement towards the Overall Goal based on the achievements of the Project to date has not really been realized as yet, but activities for the extension of project outputs are ongoing, and BNPB’s commitment to utilize project outputs are clear. The prospect of sustainability is high with preconditions for the provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT and NTB, in general, while BNPB and MoHA are promoting DRR into the local level.
5.2 Recommendations 1) Completion of all project activities.
The Project is to achieve the Project Purpose by November 2015 by continuing planned activities while paying particular attention to the following.
・ Wrap-up workshop in NTB scheduled in September 2015 is to be planned as most effective to share experience and knowledge among BNPB and province/regency/municipality BPBDs from NTB as well as from SULUT. Tambora can be considered a good option for socialization of DRR among relevant agencies and the media.
・ The approval or authorization of six technical guidelines (e.g. Technical Guideline for formulation of RDMP) in accordance with relevant BNPB regulations is necessary for these tangible outputs to be effectively disseminated and utilized for the enhancement of regency/municipality BPBDs beyond the target provinces.
・ The annual BPBD general meeting in October 2015 needs to be a good occasion for activities of Output 5. For example, distributing the technical guideline with training seminar, sharing good practice of target regency/municipality BPBDs with others, providing lectures on DRR planning and budgeting based on MoHA legislation, can be considered as a part of agenda..
vii
2) Promotion and implementation of regency/municipality RDMP In order to implement RDMP, following actions (indicative) should be undertaken as necessary by provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs, referring to the good practices of some BPBDs as described in previous sections. ・ Communication on the RDMP with cooperating authorities/agencies such as the local parliament, mayors,
local government organs such as in health and public works, army, police, and NGOs for implementing RDMP.
・ Budget preparation based on RDMP while communicating with relevant authorizes/agencies in line with MoHA regulations so that the budget on DRR to be duly prioritized and properly accommodated in SIMDA.
・ Socialization of hazard and risk maps to agencies with GIS technical capacities (e.g. BAPEDA, PU, BMKG, Sam Ratulangi University of North Sulawesi) for possible collaboration on creation/revision of GIS map based on disaster risk assessment.
3) Discussion with BNPB on the way-forward to the Overall Goal
Way-forward to the Overall Goal based on the achievements of the Project requires discussions with and engagement of BNPB on top of some activities undertaken as Output 5. Exceedingly competing duties/time of BNPB counterparts have made their involvement in the Project rather limited than initially expected even though their engagement in the Project is clear. Still, the way-forward is to be agreed during the remaining project period toward achieving the overall goal. This is also important from the viewpoint of sustainability of project outputs. Utilization of technical guideline and methodology such as creating hazard maps is one of the essentials for enhancing the disaster management capacity of BNPB and BPBDs, and it will not be sustained without a long-term perspective and multi-faceted approach.
・ Utilization of technical guideline as a part of training module in Ina-DRTG, after these guideline are authorized, can be considered.
・ BNPB can assist BPBDs to mainstream DRR into the local government development plan. Also, BNPB can liaise with MoHA to support BPBDs preparing budget for DRR.
・ The guideline for the Standard Operation Procedures (SOP) had been made, including Output 3-2 which can be implemented for other locations in Indonesia. Drill and exercise with related characteristic can be replicated to other districs involving more stakeholders in DRR.
・ Gender mainstreaming and vulnerable groups should be more involved in CBDRM and drill exercise for better resilience of the community in local level.
・ The involvement of the all local stakeholders, including the government for Community Development and Private Sectors will be important as part of the output for the programs.
・ The Risk Reduction Index should be utilized as part of evaluation measurement tool to reduce disaster risks significantly over the period of middle-phase development, as the RPJMN has stated.
5.3 Lessons Learned 1) Training in Japan was repeatedly mentioned very fruitful by those participated, some of whom had been
highly inspired and taken great initiative to promote DRR activities in their provinces and regencies. Regarding DRR technical cooperation, training in Japan seems to have the best advantage the participants can learn compared with training in other third countries.
2) Counterpart from the 1st target province (SULUT) actively participated in the 2nd target province (NTB) activities. He shared his experience in the Project and relevant achievement with the counterpart in NTB. Thus, counterpart from preceding target areas can become a resource person for activities in following target areas, and this can be included in a project design from the beginning.
3) Efforts of some BPBDs were significant in this Project. It is important to consider, in early stage of a project, how such exemplary efforts at local level, when emerged, can be disseminated and extended nationwide.
4) In this Project, local disaster management agencies (BPBDs) are not under the line administration of Central disaster management agency (BNPB). BPBDs belong to the local government, which is under MoHA. In other countries, local disaster management is undertaken by the local branch of the central disaster management agency (e.g. Office of Civil Defense in the Philippines). Such difference of administrative arrangement of DRR institution is to be taken into consideration and reflected in the project design.
-1-
Chapter 1: Outline of the Joint Terminal Evaluation
1.1 Background
One of the fundamental features of Indonesia is that it is an archipelagic state. As consequences
much of the territory of Indonesia is made of water, which has important for its identity as nation and for
character of state. By separating Indonesia’s landmass into islands, the sea creates special challenges of
communication, coordination, and even identity. The seas that lie between and around the islands need
to be governed. These seas represent major strategic, economic, and cultural resources for Indonesia,
governing the maritime zone poses enormous practical difficulties 1 . Disaster-prone developing
countries, in particular the least developed countries, small island developing States, landlocked
developing countries, as well as middle-income countries facing specific challenges, warrant particular
attention in view of their higher vulnerability and risk levels, which often greatly exceed their capacity to
respond to and recover from disasters. Similar attention and appropriate assistance should also be
extended to other disaster-prone countries with specific characteristics, such as archipelagic countries, as
well as countries with extensive coastlines2. From this specific characteristic, Indonesia has a high risk
of disaster with its multi hazards. Therefore, special attention should define as important role of the
local government, managing the risk, policy instruments and planning with adequate risk.
Geographically Indonesia is situated in the tropical zone that has two seasons: the dry season and
rainy season. Drought and forest/land fire occur in the dry season, while inundation/flooding caused by
heavy rain frequently occur in the rainy season. The country is also situated at the meeting points of the
Pacific plate, Euro Asian plate, and Indo Australian plan, thus facing disasters caused by earthquake,
Tsunami, and volcanic eruption. Recent disasters with substantial casualties include the Indian Ocean
earthquake and tsunami in December 2004, the Central Java earthquake in May 2006, the Padang
earthquake in September 2009, eruption of Mount Merapi and the Mentawai island tsunami in September
2010.
Under the circumstances, the government of Indonesia enacted the Law No. 24 on Disaster
Management in 2007 and established BNPB (National Disaster Management Agency) in 2008 to
strengthen its disaster risk management capacities. At the same time, the government of Indonesia
requested the government of Japan to formulate a comprehensive disaster management plan at the
national and local level as well as to enhance capacities for natural disaster risk management. In
response to the request, JICA implemented "The Study on Natural Disaster Management in Indonesia"
(hereinafter referred to as "the JICA Study") from March 2007 to March 2009. Through this Study, a
system for disaster management at national and local levels was determined. BNPB, however, was
established only recently and doesn’t have enough capacities such as organizational structure, budget,
1 Indonesia beyond the Water’s Edge. Managing an Archipelagic State. Robert Cribb and Michele Ford. ISEAS. 2009. 2 Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. UN Document on SFDRR-A/CONF.224/CRP.1. 2015
-2-
skills, and knowhow, thus having difficulty in providing proper guidance and support to establish BPBD
(Regional Disaster Management Agency) and to formulate a regional disaster management plan.
Moreover, strengthening the capacity of BPBD is an urgent issue to improve the overall disaster risk
management of Indonesia.
Against this background, the Project has started in November 2011 with BNPB, North Sulawesi
Provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs as counterparts, aiming at the enhancement of the disaster
management capacity of these counterpart agencies. At the halfway point of the implementation period,
the Project underwent the mid-term review in August - September 2013. In compliance with the
provision of the Record of Discussions (R/D) signed on 11 July 2011, JICA and Indonesian authorities
concerned jointly conducted the terminal evaluation of the Project, six months before the expiry of the
project cooperation between JICA and BNPB on the Project.
1.2 Objectives of the Terminal Evaluation
The objectives of the terminal evaluation are to:
1) evaluate the level of progress and implementation of the Project towards achieving the Project
Purpose in light of the five evaluation criteria (Relevance, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Impact and
Sustainability) based on the JICA New Guideline for Project Evaluation;
2) confirm activities carried out after the mid-term review and measures taken in response to the
recommendations made at the mid-term review;
3) make recommendations for achieving the Project Purpose during the remaining project term as
well as for utilization and sustainability of project outputs/benefits; and
4) confirm the evaluation results and recommendations above with Indonesian authorities and
agree on the minutes of meetings.
1.3 Outline of the Project
R/D was signed on 11 July 2011. The PDM ver.2 approved on the 4th JCC meeting on 3 April 2014
describes the outline of the Project as follows. (Appendix 1).
1) Project Term
Four years from November 2011 to November 2015
2) Target Area (pilot province)
North Sulawesi Province (Manado Municipality and other regencies/municipalities) West
Nusa Tenggara Province (Mataram Municipality and other regencies/municipalities)
3) Target Group
National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB); at least two Regional Disaster Management
Agencies (BPBDs) of two provinces: North Sulawesi Province, West Nusa Tenggara Province,
and the Regency/Municipality BPBDs in the target area (pilot provinces)
-3-
4) Overall Goal
The provincial BPBD as well as the regency/municipality BPBDs beside the target areas are
established, and the disaster management capacities of them are enhanced by using materials
formulated and methodology established in the Project.
5) Project Purpose
The disaster management capacities of BNPB, the provincial BPBDs, and the
regency/municipality BPBDs in the target area are enhanced.
6) Outputs
1. The capacity for the regency/municipality BPBDs to accumulate disaster data/information
which are fundamental for disaster risk management and improve accuracy of such
data/information in the target area is enhanced.
2. The capacity for creation of hazard and risk maps at regency/municipality level in the
target area is enhanced.
3. The capacity for formulation of regional disaster management plans for
regency/municipality in the target area is enhanced.
4. The capacity for conducting disaster management exercises at the regency/municipality in
the target area is enhanced.
5. Nationwide dissemination activities are implemented.
1.4 Member of the Evaluation Team
The joint evaluation was conducted by the team composed by the following members:
1) Indonesian side
Name Position Organization
Dr. Raditya Jati Evaluation Deputy Director for Disaster Prevention, BNPB
2) Japanese side
Name Position Title
OTSUKI Eiji Leader Senior Advisor to the Director General, Global Environment Department, JICA
SHINYA Takafumi Disaster Management
Policy JICA Expert (Jakarta)
AKIYAMA Shintaro Survey Planning Advisor, Disaster Management Team 2, Global Environment Department, JICA
IRABU Shusuke CBDRM Disaster Management Team 2, Global Environment Department, JICA
OKUDA Hiroyuki Evaluation and Analysis Tekizaitekisho. LLC.
-4-
1.5 Schedule of the Terminal Evaluation
The schedule of the terminal evaluation is attached (Appendix 3)
1.6 Methodology of the Terminal Evaluation
The terminal evaluation is carried out by the joint evaluation team comprising of Indonesian member
and Japanese member, in accordance with “the JICA New Guideline for Project Evaluation, Ver. 1 (June
2010)”, which follows “the Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance, 1991” issued by
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development – Development Assistance Committee
(OECD-DAC). The PDM with the statement of the Project Purpose, Outputs and Activities is the basic
reference point on the Project. Results of the joint evaluation is shared among stakeholders at the JCC
meeting, agreed upon, then finalized as the joint terminal evaluation report, and consequently signed on
the Minutes of Meetings. The process and methodology of the evaluation is as follows:
1) Verify and analyze achievements of the Project (delivery of each output, actual inputs and
progress towards the Project Purpose) and project implementation process;
2) Formulate a framework of evaluation items/questions – evaluation grid (Appendix 12) - to
collect relevant data and information on each of the five evaluation criteria;
3) Prepare a draft of joint evaluation report with the comprehensive analysis of the Project based
on findings and information collected through reports, interviews, questionnaire survey,
hearings, and project site visits;
4) Confirm measures concerning the recommendations made at the mid-term review;
5) Report the results of the terminal evaluation to the JCC, and sign the Minutes of Meeting on
what is agreed upon;
6) Survey basic policies and administrative arrangements after the inauguration of the new
president in November 2014; and
7) Draw lessons learned from experiences of the Project, which aims at capacity strengthening of
disaster management organizations for other ongoing or future similar technical cooperation
projects.
The criteria used for the evaluation are the following five criteria: relevance, effectiveness, efficiency,
impact and sustainability.
Relevance Relevance is reviewed by the validity of the Project Purpose in light of Indonesia’s development policies and needs and Japanese cooperation policies.
Effectiveness Effectiveness is assessed to what extent the Project is achieving the Project Purpose, clarifying the relationship between the Project Purpose and Outputs.
Efficiency Efficiency is analyzed with emphasis on the relationship between Outputs and Inputs in terms of timing, quality, and quantity.
Impact Impact is assessed in terms of positive/negative and expected/unexpected influence caused by the Project.
Sustainability Sustainability is assessed in terms of institutional, financial, and technical aspects by examining the extent to which the achievements of the Project will be sustained after the Project is completed.
-5-
Chapter 2: Achievement of the Project
2.1 Results of Input
(Japanese side)
2.1.1 Dispatch of Japanese Experts
The Project started with the dispatch of 7 short-term experts (Chief Advisor/Comprehensive Disaster
Management, Deputy Chief Advisor/Regional Disaster Management Planning, Disaster Management
Institution and Organization, Emergency Response Planning, Disaster Mitigation Measures, Capacity
Development, Coordinator/Support of the Expert in CBDRM) in November 2011. Since then, total 18
short-term experts have been dispatched for the Project as of April 2015, totaling 3,126 days. The
Project also has hired total 18 local staff personnel in North Sulawesi and West Nusa Tenggara Province.
They are local consultants to work for each of the 4 outputs, as well as local staff such as project
assistants, secretaries, translators/interpreters, GIS operators, and drivers. (Appendix 5)
2.1.2 Provision of Equipment
Equipment includes not only office equipment such as printer and computer, but also plotter and GIS
software along with satellite image, elevation data. The equipment were installed and used at the BPBD
SULUT office for project activities, then handed over to the provincial BPBD in March 2014 when
activities in the province were completed. Similar kind of equipment was procured and set up at the
BPBD NTB office. (Appendix 6)
2.1.3 Counterpart Training
Counterpart training was conducted twice in Japan as follows. (Appendix 7)
Duration Breakdown of the participants Visited Institutions
25 Aug – 8 Sep 2012 (19 participants)
2 from BNPB 2 from BPBD SULUT Province (including Provincial PM) 15 from regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT
MLIT Tohoku Bureau, Sumida Ward Government Ishinomaki City, etc.
16 Aug – 30 Aug 2014 (20 participants)
5 from BNPB 3 from BPBD NTB Province (including Provincial PM) 10 from regency/municipality BPBDs in NTB 1 from BPBD SULUT Province 1 from regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT
Sakurajima Volcano Center, Kagoshima local governments, CBDRM Group in Sakura-Jima, MLIT Kyusyu Bureau, Ishinomaki City, etc.
-6-
2.1.4 Local Cost
Japanese side has provided a part of necessary local operation budget to carry out project activities.
The expenses include miscellaneous expenses, equipment and training in Japan, totaling 64.3 million JPY
from July 2011 to March 2015. (Appendix 9)
(Indonesian Side)
2.1.5 Assignment of Counterpart Personnel
According to the signed R/D, Deputy Chief for Prevention and Preparedness, BNPB, is the Project
Director responsible for the overall administration and implementation of the Project, and Director for
Disaster Risk Reduction, BNPB, is the Project Manager responsible for managerial and technical matters
of the Project.
In the actual implementation, four project managers have been assigned from BNPB corresponding
to each output: they are Director for Disaster Risk Reduction (Output 2, 3-1 and 5); Director for
Preparedness (Output 3-2 and 4-1); Head of Data, Information and Public Relation Center (Output 1 and
2); and Director for Community Empowerment (Output 4-2).
Output Project Manager in BNPB Output 1 Disaster Data and Information Head of Data, Information and Public
Relation CenterOutput 2 Hazard and Risk Maps Director for Disaster Risk ReductionOutput 3-1 Regional Disaster Management Plan and
Action Plan Director for Disaster Risk Reduction
Output 3-2 SOP and Contingency Plan Director for Preparedness Output 4-1 Disaster Management Drill and Exercise Director for Preparedness Output 4-2 Community-based Disaster Risk
Management Director for Community Empowerment
Output 5 Dissemination of RDMP technical guideline Director for Disaster Risk Reduction
At the provincial level, the head of BPBD SULUT was engaged in the Project as the Province Team
Director. At the regency/municipality level, the heads of all the 15 BPBDs in SULUT were engaged in
the Project as team directors to implement project activities at each regency/municipality.
Implementation arrangement of West Nusa Tenggara Province is the same: the head of BPBD NTB is the
team director involving all the heads of 10 regency/municipality BPBDs. (Appendix 8)
2.1.6 Operation Budget
The budget amount of counterpart agencies (BNPB and BPBD) used for implementing project
activities were not clarified during the terminal evaluation as the expenditure for the purpose had not been
separately recorded at each office. (Appendix 9)
-7-
2.1.7 Project facilities
The office space and facilities were provided to the Project by BPBD SULUT from October 2012 to
March 2014, and has been provided by BPBD NTB from June 2014 to the present. The Japanese
experts, project staff and local consultants are based at the office.
2.2 Progress in Achieving Expected Outputs
Achievements and progress of the Project are examined in detail in the Result Grid in accordance
with the set indicators. At the 4th JCC in April 2014, it was agreed that activities in the 2nd target
province of NTB were to be narrowed down to Output 2, 3-1, and 4-2. The PDM was revised
accordingly as PDM ver.2. (Appendix 10)
Output
North Sulawesi Province
Oct 2012 - Mar 2014
West Nusa Tenggara
Jun 2014 - Present
Output 1 Disaster Data and Information ○ Not conducted
Output 2 Hazard and Risk Maps ○ ○
Output 3-1 Regional Disaster Management Plan and Action Plan
○ ○
Output 3-2 SOP and Contingency Plan ○ Not conducted
Output 4-1 Disaster Management Drill and Exercise ○ Not conducted
Output 4-2 Community-based Disaster Risk Management
○ ○
Output 5 Dissemination of RDMP technical guideline
Newly added output after the Mid-term review
In the 1st target province of SULUT, 1 provincial BPBD and 15 regency/municipality BPBDs were
the target groups involved in the Project. In the 2nd target province of NTB, 1 provincial BPBD and 10
regency/municipality BPBDs are the target group, implementing project activities of output 2, 3-1 and
4-2.
Administrative level
North Sulawesi (SULUT) West Nusa Tenggara (NTB)
Provincial 1 provincial BPBD 1 provincial BPBD
Regency/Municipal 4 municipality BPBDs Manado, Tomohon, Bitung,
Kotamobagu 11regency BPBDs
Bolaang Mongondow, Bolaang Mongondow North, Bolaang Mongondow South, Bolaang Mondondow East, Minahasa, Minahasa North, Minahasa South, Minahasa Southeast, Kepulauan Sitaro, Kepulauan Sangihe, Kepulauan Talaud
2 municipality BPBDs Mataram, Bima
8 regency BPBDs Lombok North, Lombok West, Lombok Central, Lombok East, Bima, Dompu, Sumbawa, Sumbawa West
-8-
2.2.1 Output 1: Disaster Data and Information (SULUT)
・ Based on the Head of BNPB Regulation No.8/2011 (Standardization of Disaster Data), five data
formats to accumulate and share necessary disaster data was developed through workshops with
provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs. Focusing on pre-disaster and emergency response
phases, these formats are: 1) Pre Disaster Data: A district/city Profile, 2) Pre Disaster Data: B
Resources Availability – Logistic, 3) Initial Record of Disaster Incident Information, 4) Emergency
Response Data: Disaster Incident Form, and 5) Survey in Disaster Location Form. At the flood
event occurred in February 2013 in Manado, the data formats were tentatively used and its suitability
and usefulness in acquiring disaster data/information were examined.
・ Technical Guideline for Collecting and Storing Disaster Data/Information was completed, including
the five formats above, in September 2013, to support the Head of BNPB Regulation No.8/2011.
2.2.2 Output 2: Hazard and Risk Maps (SULUT, NTB)
・ In accordance with the multi-hazard risk assessment methodologies (encompassing hazard,
vulnerability and local capacity) prescribed by BNPB Regulation No.2/2012, all 15
regencies/municipalities in SULUT were furnished with hazard maps, vulnerability maps, and risk
maps on nine disasters (Flood, Flashflood, Landslide, Extreme Weather, Drought, Forest Fire,
Earthquake, Tsunami, and Volcanic Eruption) through the Project by March 2014. Counterpart of
regency/municipality BPBDs were engaged in collecting historical records of disaster events and its
mapping manually (for hazard map) as well as colleting statistical data and compiling them as
database (for vulnerability map). The Project conducted digitization of collected data on GIS at the
GIS corner established at BPBD SULUT. The GIS equipment was handed over to BPBD SULUT
dated on 28 March 2014.
・ Technical Guideline for Creation of Hazard Map for Regencies/Municipalities (Ver. 2) was
developed by September 2013 in parallel with the creation of the hazard and risk maps.
・ At present, same activities are being implemented in NTB. Basic and other information on hazard,
vulnerability, capacity, and disaster risk were collected and maps were almost completed at the GIS
corner established in the BPBD NTB. As for the capacity assessment, FGD for disaster risk and
capacity assessment at regency/municipality level were conducted at all the 10 BPBD in September
2014 by a local NGO contracted by the Project. Disaster Risk Assessment Matrix for each
regency/municipality will be prepared by each BPBD to be included in the RDMP.
-9-
2.2.3 Output 3-1: Regional Disaster Management Plan and Action Plan (SULUT, NTB)
・ Based on the Head of BNPB Regulation No.4/2008, RDMPs were developed through a series of
workshop conducted by the Project with provincial/regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT (from
the kick-off in October 2012 to the wrap-up in March 2014). All the RDMPs were approved by the
head of BPBD by November 2014.
Regency/Municipality in SULUT Formulation of RDMP
Signature (for legislation) BPBD Director Mayor
1 Kota Manado Completed (developed as the sample RDMP)
Aug 2014 ○
2 Kota Tomohon Completed Oct 2014 3 Kota Bitung Completed Feb 2014 ○ 4 Kota Kotamobagu Completed Mar 2014 5 Kab. Minahasa in the BNPB project based on Perka No.4/2008 6 Kab. Minahasa North Completed Mar 2014 ○ 7 Kab. Minahasa South Completed Oct 2014 8 Kab. Minahasa Southeast Completed Aug 2014 ○ 9 Kab. Bolaang
Mongondow Completed Oct 2014
10 Kab. Bol Mon North Completed Oct 2014 ○ 11 Kab. Bol Mon South Completed Nov 2014 ○ 12 Kab. Bol Mon East Completed Oct 2014 ○ 13 Kab. Talaud (islands) Completed Mar 2014 14 Kab. Sangihe (islands) Completed Nov 2014 ○ 15 Kab. Sitaro (Islands) Completed Mar 2014 ○
・ Technical Guideline of Regional Disaster Management Plan for Kabupaten/Kota (Ver. 1.5) was
developed by August 2014 in parallel with the development and completion of RDMPs.
・ At present, same activities are being implemented in NTB. The 4th workshop was held on 16 April
2015 attended by 8 regency/municipality BPBDs. The wrap-up workshop is scheduled in
September 2015 to complete the formulation of RDMPs in 10 regencies/municipalities.
2.2.4 Output 3-2: SOP and Contingency Plan (SULUT)
・ Technical Guideline for Formulation of SOP was developed by May 2012 through a series of
workshop with provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs. SOP of Sitaro for Facing Disaster
Volcano Karangetang was completed during the Project. BPBD Tomohon revised the existing SOP
on Volcano in September 2014. BPBD Bitung also finalized its SOP in September 2014.
2.2.5 utput 4-1: Disaster Management Drill and Exercise (SULUT)
・ Total 15 disaster management exercise (1 DIG, 13 TTX, 1 CPX) were conducted by the Project. At
the end of the activities in SULUT, Technical Guideline for Disaster Relief Exercise was finalized.
-10-
Meeting Date Agenda 1) DIG 10 Oct 2012, Manado Disaster Imagination Game at the joint kick-off
workshop with the Output 3. 2) TTX 18 Oct – 6 Dec 2012 in 13
regencies/municipalities Table Top Exercise conducted at 13 Kabupaten/Kota visited by the Project team.
3) CPX 18 Sep 2013 in Manado and simultaneously in Sitaro
Disaster management drill (Command Post Exercise) was conducted with the participation of BNPB, Provincial BPBD, Manado, Bitung, and Sitaro BPBD
2.2.6 Output 4-2: Community-based Disaster Risk Management (SULUT, NTB)
・ Activities on CBDRM (community-based disaster risk management) were implemented at two pilot
villages in SULUT: Desa Moyag in Kotamobagu, and Kelurahan Bebali in Sitaro. The activities
included training workshops and the preparation of village disaster management plans and hazard
maps. The activities were implemented concurrently with the Disaster Resilient Villages Program
conducted by BNPB since 2012. At the end of CBDRM activities in SULUT, Activities for
“Disaster Resilient Village” Program – As a Good Practice Model – (Ver.1.0) Mar 2014 was
developed.
・ Same activities are currently undertaken at 1 pilot village in NTB: Desa Kuta, Kabupaten Lombok
Central, as scheduled. Following the Kick-off W/S and an introductory training on 19-20 June
2014, one community leader W/S and four community W/S were conducted. On 18 April 2015, a
tsunami evacuation drill was conducted in the village, where village people, BPBD officers (BPBD
NTB and BPBD Lombok Central), BPBD 4-2 counterparts from 9 regencies/municipalities, relevant
organizations such as army and PMI participated in.
2.2.7 Output 5: Dissemination of RDMP technical guideline
・ Dissemination of RDMP Technical Guideline has so far been conducted on occasion such as below.
1) Presentation at side events of disaster management drill - Large-scale disaster management drill at
Padang in Sumatera Barat (19 Mar 2014).
2) Presentation and panel discussion at the annual BNPB general meeting (14 Oct 2014) on the
technical guideline on RDMP with BAPPENAS and BNPB. The panel discussion was
participated by Kota Bitung on good practices from the Project.
3) Technical training for BNPB (8 - 9 Jan 2015) for 30 BNPB officers at BNPB sentul office on the
guideline for formulating RDMPs.
2.2.8 Achievement of Output Indicators
The Project has so far delivered the five outputs as summarized above. The level of achievement is
assessed based on the set indicators in the PDM. Among the 8 indicators set at the output level, the
Project so far has achieved 3 indicators, partially achieved 4 indicators, and has yet to achieve 1 indicator.
Four indicators are partially achieved because relevant activities are still ongoing in NTB such as Output
-11-
2 (Hazard and Risk Maps), Output 3-1 (RDMP), Output 4-2 (CBDRM), as well as Output 5 at the central
government level of BNPB (Technical Guideline dissemination). These activities are being
implemented as planned without delay, and are expected to be completed by the end of the Project.
There is one indicator that is yet to be achieved (Indicator 5-1), and this is because the technical guideline
is yet to be completed and is supposed to be approved through due process in BNPB before it is utilized
as referential documents.
No Indicator Assessment and Current Status
1-1 Accumulation of disaster data items (Newly accumulated since there are no existing data) in the target area.
Achieved
1-2 Improvement of disaster data quality (By following the format, data are sufficiently accumulated) in the target area.
Achieved
2-1 Number of the regencies/municipalities where hazard and risk maps at regency/municipality level are created in the target area.
Partially Achieved (Activities in NTB still ongoing.)
3-1 Number of the regencies/municipalities where regional disaster management plans are formulated at regency/municipality level in the target area.
Partially Achieved (Activities in NTB still ongoing.)
4-1 Number of disaster management exercises implemented in the target area.
Achieved
4-2 Number of activities on CBDRM in the target area. Partially Achieved (Activities in NTB still ongoing)
5-1 Technical Guideline for formulation of RDMP is utilized as reference documents of BNPB.
Yet to be achieved (Finalization/endorsement of the Technical Guideline is necessary)
5-2 Number of events to support nationwide dissemination activities on formulation of RDMP.
Partially Achieved (More events are scheduled in future)
-12-
2.3 Prospect of Achieving the Project Purpose
2.3.1 Progress towards the Project Purpose
The Project Purpose is “the disaster management capacities of BNPB, the provincial BPBDs, and the
regency/municipality BPBDs in the target area are enhanced.”
Activities at the 1st target province of SULUT were completed in March 2014. The capacity for
BPBDs to accumulate disaster data/information was enhanced with the development of data formats and
the Manual (Output 1). Hazard and risk maps were created through the disaster risk assessment in all
the 15 regencies/municipalities (Output 2). The capacities for formulating RDMPs were enhanced as
they were prepared by BPBDs themselves at all the 15 regencies/municipalities (Output 3); and CBDRM
activities were implemented at 2 pilot villages. At the 2nd target province of NTB, activities are
currently being implemented focusing on Output 2, Output 3-1, and Output 4-2. With the completion of
these activities, the Project Purpose is likely to be achieved as there are no immediate obstacles observed
during the terminal evaluation.
2.3.2 Achievement of Project Purpose Indicator
Regarding the two project purpose indicators, they are only partially achieved at present because the
activities are still ongoing in the 2nd pilot province of NTB.
No Indicator Assessment and Current Status
1 Number or Cases that Regional Disaster Management Plan (RDMP) formulated through the Project processed to approve by the local authority.
Partially Achieved (Activities in NTB still ongoing.)
2 Number of voluntary disaster management exercises conducted in the communities within the target area.
Partially Achieved (Activities in NTB still ongoing.)
Indicator 1 of the Project Purpose is expected to be achieved at the end of the Project when RDMPs
in NTB are all finalized and approved by the head of BPBDs. All the RDMPs developed in SULUT
were already approved by November 2014. Indicator 2 of the Project Purpose concerns voluntary
activities within the target areas. During the terminal evaluation, at least six voluntary activities were
mentioned in the interview (not all regency/municipality BPBDs were interviewed in SULUT). These
activities were conducted after the project activities finished in March2014.
-13-
Level Voluntary disaster management exercise in the target area
Province 1) BPBD SULUT organized an evacuation drill on 4 October 2013 at governor’s field office, involving 300 personnel from BPBD Manado, BPBD Tomohon, army, provincial health office, PMI, and other institutions. The next day of the drill, stakeholder showed their resources. Each agency demonstrated how to use the equipment.
Regency and Municipality
2) BPBD Bitung organized an evacuation drill in May 2014 participated by disaster related agencies in Bitung (e.g. agency for health, social, and public works), other community based organizations (e.g. TAGANA, SIBAT), and PMI
3) BPBD Manado conducted an evacuation drill in January 2015 based on experience of the two preceding CPX (Sep 2013 and Oct 2014)
4) BPBD Sitaro allocated IDR 20 million (2014) and IDR 40 million (2015) to promote CBDRM at Desa Tatahadeng (2014), Desa Dompaso and Desa Ranotana (2015)
5) BPBD Sitaro has established “Disaster Management Forum” to revise the RDMP including members from villages.
6) BPBD Sitaro was involved in the community evacuation drill organized by the Red Cross local office in October 2014 (the relationship between BPBD Sitaro and the Red Cross local office had been strengthened due to the Project)
Village - At Kelurahan Bebali (one of the two pilot villages) Sitaro, consideration on revising volcano hazard map for setting up sign boards is ongoing in 2015
2.4 Implementation Process
At BNPB, there are four Project Managers assigned under the Project Director. Under the four
project managers, more than 17 officials of BNPB have been engaged in the Project as the counterpart.
The Project Director changed two times (August 2013, October 2014) due to the transfer of the Deputy of
Prevention and Preparedness BNPB. At the provincial level, BPBD SULUT and BPBD NTB are
engaged in the Project to coordinate regency/municipality BPBDs. Also, at the regency/municipality
level, at least two officials are supposed to be assigned to one of the sub-divided outputs from each
regency/municipality BPBD. As such, almost 400 BPBD officers in total are involved in the Project at
the regency/municipality level.
The Japanese project team consists of Japanese short-term experts, 4 local consultants and 10 project
local staff (such as secretaries, translators, GIS operators, and drivers). The Project covers all the
regencies/municipalities under the two provinces; hence it is not possible for the Japanese experts to
frequently visit each regency/municipality BPBD for transferring knowledge/skills. Local consultants
bridged that gap, visiting regencies/municipalities as necessary to ensure good communication and the
transfer. The Project activities were mainly promoted through workshops gathering BPBD officers.
Then, the BPBDs officers themselves carried out actual activities such as the formulation of RDMP. For
BPBD officers who were not able to attend the workshops, local consultants and experts traveled to visit
them for follow-ups so that they could keep abreast of the progress of the Project.
-15-
Chapter 3: Review by the Five Criteria
3.1 Relevance
The relevance of the Project remains high.
(1) The new government has recently passed the new Middle-Term National Development Plan
2015-2019. The plan brings new hope to the people and the nation, as it puts emphasis on
enhancing the country’s political sovereignty and independence in economy and culture through
the implementation of Nawacita or the Nine Priority Programs. In line with the Nawacita, the
Middle-term Development Plan, often abbreviated as RPJMN, has also nine key priorities. A
number of priorities may greatly enhance disaster risk reduction efforts in Indonesia, as they
promise protection and security to all people, improvement of the quality of life, economic
independence, and stronger development intervention at the village level3.
(2) Issues related to disaster risk reduction have been specifically referred to in the new middle-term
development plan. In the part of RPJMN that elaborates the general direction of development in
2015-2019, it is mentioned that the national development will be geared, among others, towards
improving the quality of the environment, and the management of natural disaster mitigation and
climate change. This will be done through strengthening of the monitoring of the quality of the
environment, control of pollution and environmental degradation, enforcement of environmental
laws, disaster risk reduction, enhancement of the resilience of government and the people to
disaster, and increasing capacity in climate change mitigation and adaptation4.
(3) The relevance of the Project to the DRR policy in Indonesia remains high from the initial
planning survey in 2011 through the mid-term review in 2013. In accordance with the RPJMN,
National Disaster Management Plan (2015-2019) is currently being developed, which will be the
basic reference on DRR policy for government institutions and relevant stakeholders. Disaster
Risk Index and RANPRB (National Action Plan for DRR) will be annexed to the National
Disaster Management Plan. Since its beginning in 2011, the Project continues to adjust its
outputs/activities in accordance with new legislation, which include the Head of BNPB regulation
such as Perka BNPB 8-2011 (Standardization of Disaster Data); Perka BNPB 2-2012 (General
Guideline on Disaster Risk Assessment for Disaster Management Planning); and Perka BNPB
1-2012 (General Guideline on Disaster Resilient Village). Accordingly, the Project has
sustained its relevance throughout the cooperation period. As for the Perka BNPB 2-2012, its
revision is currently ongoing, upon the completion of which the Technical Guideline for
formulation of RDMPs is also planned to be finalized.
3 Indonesia’s Country Paper for 3rd WCDRR. 2015 4 Ibid.
-16-
(4) National Progress Report on the Implementation of the Hyogo Framework Action (2013-2015) by
BNPB summarizes Indonesia’s efforts and current descriptions on disaster risk management.
The Project contributed to HFA’s three Strategic Goal Areas of Indonesia, which focuses on the
strengthening of disaster management planning at the provincial and district/city levels, the
strengthening of capacities of provincial and district/city disaster management agencies (BPBD)
and the promotion of disaster resilient villages, and the engagement of stakeholders in
contingency planning and disaster emergency response exercises.
(5) The selection of SULUT and NTB as target provinces is appropriate in that the Project meets the
needs and expectations of counterpart agencies (provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs) that
require capacity development to better prepare and respond to natural disasters. They had to
cope with natural disasters that occurred recently: the flood in Manado (17 Feb 2013), the flood in
Manado and Tomohon (15 Jan 2014), and the flood in Bitung (3-4 Feb 2015).
(6) The Project is aligned with the cooperation policy of Japan with Indonesia. Natural disaster and
its risk reduction are mentioned under the “building a sustainable and resilient international
community through efforts to address global challenges” – one of priority policies of the
Development Cooperation Charter decided by the Japanese Cabinet in February 2015.
Cooperation with respective country is still to be framed by Japan’s County Assistance Policy.
The one for Indonesia dated April 2012 maintains, as one of its three priority areas, that Japan
offers assistance for Indonesia to improve systems and organizations which take disaster
preventive measures. Accordingly, the Project is included in the Program for Improvement of
Disaster Management Capacity under the Rolling Plan which is attached to the County Assistance
Policy.
(7) Japan has also renewed its commitment to international cooperation on DRR under the Sendai
Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015-20130) adopted on 18 March 2015. As
mentioned in the document A/CONF.224/CRP.1 “Given their different capacities as well as the
linkage between the level of support provided to them and the extent to which they will be able to
implement the present framework, developing countries require enhanced provisions of means of
implementation, including adequate, sustainable, and timely resources, through international
cooperation and global partnership for development, and continued international support, to
strengthen their efforts to reduce disaster risk” “International cooperation for disaster risk
reduction includes a variety of sources and is a critical element in supporting the efforts of
developing countries to reduce disaster risk. In addressing economic disparity and disparity in
technological innovation and research capacity among countries it is crucial to enhance
technology transfer involving a process of enabling and facilitating flows of skill, knowledge,
ideas, know-how and technology from developed to developing countries in the implementation of
-17-
the present framework” and “such vulnerability requires the urgent strengthening of
international cooperation and ensuring genuine and durable partnerships at the regional and
international levels in order to support developing countries to implement this framework in
accordance with their national priorities and needs”5.
3.2 Effectiveness
The effectiveness of the Project is high.
(1) The project is assessed as effective mainly because its activities are obtaining the expected
outputs as planned toward achieving the Project Purpose. Currently, the Project is making a firm
progress at each output in the 2nd target province of NTB, covering all the 10
regency/municipality BPBDs. By continuing the current activities, the Project is more likely to
attain its goal by the end of project period, November 2015. No immediate obstacles that would
keep the Project from achieving the set indicators in PDM are observed during the terminal
evaluation.
(2) There has been significant capacity development of the provincial/regency/municipal BPBDs at
the individual level through working with the processes of project implementation6. Through a
series of workshop and technical follow-up, regency/municipality BPBD officers have gained
knowledge on the comprehensive approach to DRR (prevention and preparedness, emergency
response, recovery and reconstruction) and specific measures to be taken at each phase, acquired
skills on disaster risk assessment, and eventually demonstrated what they had learned by
formulating RDMPs for themselves. More importantly, BPBD officers have recognized their
role/responsibility as the local DRR management agency, which leads to higher motivation to
work. Technical Guideline on RDMP was effective for providing BPBD officers with a
step-by-step instruction on how to prepare a RDMP. The Excel application to reduce omission
or mistakes in preparing RDMP was attached to the technical guideline. Such development of
capacity (increase of knowledge, skills and experiences) was widely appreciated by BPBD
counterparts during the terminal evaluation. BPBDs are of local government and not under the
administration of BNPB. BNPB, being responsible for providing technical assistance to BPBD,
also acknowledged the contribution of the Project to BPBDs capacity enhancement.
(3) Tangible outputs such as RDMPs, hazard maps, and various technical guidelines has enhanced
BPBD’s capacity at the organizational level in that BPBDs are now equipped with plans and
procedures (RDMPs for all and SOP for some BPBDs) as well as referential materials (technical
guideline). As for RDMP, it is desirable that the RDMP can be converted into the Head of Local
5 Ibid no. 2. 6 Capacity development takes place at three different levels: individual level, organizational level, and society/institutional level- Capacity Assessment Handbook (2008), JICA
-18-
Government Regulation (see the case of Bitung in 3.2 (6)). It is also necessary to see to it that
the RDMP is mainstreamed in local development plan (see the efforts of Tomohon in 3.2 (7)).
Of most importance is that RDMP is to be implemented by ensuring budget allocation. (see 3.2
(4), ~ 3.2 (8))
(4) Six technical guidelines will be completed in the Project. BNPB acknowledges these guidelines
useful, and currently considers how these documents to be adopted or approved when they are
completed. BNPB also consider distributing these guidelines to BPBDs widely at an occasion
of DRR day, scheduled in Solo (Central Java) in October 2015, as a part of activities for Output 5.
Output Produced Materials Current statusMost relevant
regulation
Output 1 Disaster Data and Information
Technical Guideline for Collecting and Storing Disaster Data/Information (Sep 2013)
Completed Perka BNPB 8-2011
Output 2 Hazard and Risk Maps
Technical Guideline for Creation of Hazard Map for Regencies/Municipalities (Ver. 2) (Sep 2013)
To be finalized with the NTB activity completion.
Perka BNPB 2-2012 currently under revision
Output 3-1 Regional Disaster Management Plan and Action Plan
Technical Guideline of Regional Disaster Management Plan for Kabupaten/Kota (Ver. 1.5) (Aug 2014)
To be finalized with the NTB activity completion
Perka BNPB 4-2008 currently under revision, National Disaster Management Plan (2015-2019) currently under formulation
Output 3-2 SOP and Contingency Plan
Technical Guideline for Formulation of SOP (May 2012)
Completed (eight Perka BPBD regultions)
Output 4-1 Disaster Management Drill and Exercise
Technical Guideline for Disaster Relief Exercise (Mar 2014)
Completed
Perka BNPB on disaster management exercise implementation still under formulation
Output 4-2 Community-based Disaster Risk Management
Activities for “Disaster Resilient Village” Program – As a Good Practice Model – (Ver.1.0) (Mar 2014)
To be finalized with the NTB activity completion
Perka BNPB 1-2012 and annual technical guidelines for disaster resilient village program
(5) In relation to the enhanced capacity of BPBD, they have become more capable of preparing the
budget, which is necessary for the implementation of RDMPs. The list of activities included in
RDMP helps BPBD to prepare the annual working plan (RKPD) and then, the budget
implementation document (DPA) in the local government.
-19-
Sketch on planning and budgeting of the local government
(6) Some BPBDs such as Bitung and Tomohon have already taken significant actions in preparing the
budget for implementing the RDMP. In this sense, they demonstrated what they had learned by
formulating RDMP themselves, and further applied to their actual work in budget preparation.
For example, BPBD Bitung has successfully raised the budget for DRR since 2013. This is
attributed to the BPBD Bitung actively communicating with relevant stakeholders (the local
parliament, the mayor, BPKP, and other local government agencies/department) on RDMP, and
establishing effective working relationship with them. This is one example where the capacity
development has taken place at the institutional level, not only confined to an organization or
some individuals.
1. BPBD drafted a local government regulation. The draft was eventually approved by the local parliament in September 2013 as local government regulation on disaster management – Bitung City Local Regulation No.25/2013 about the Implementation of Disaster Management. This regulation is to make sure that all government agencies in Bitung would consider disaster management issues in their own respective activities.
2. The mayor set up the Verification & Evaluation Team consisting of BAPPEDA, Division for Budgeting under BPK-BMD, Division for Development under SEKDA. This team is to make sure that all proposals from government agencies would include DRR and climate change issues.
3. BPBD consulted with BPKP (provincial local government auditor) and acquired new account numbers (i.e. identify existing account number or create new account number if necessary) in SIMDA system (which is managed by BPKP) for DRR activities based on the list of program/activities in the RDMP. (MoHA regulation 27/2014 allows the local government to allocate new activities which are not regulated previously in SIMDA.)
4. Some DRR activities with budget proposal prepared by BPBD were successfully approved by the local parliament, therefore BPBD total budget allocation is increasing from year to year.
5. Bitung had a Mayor regulation No 43/2014 – Procedure to provide and be responsible for unpredicted expenditure. During the flood in February 2014, response and recovery were required but budget was not allocated. Then, the mayor, the parliament, and budgeting team met together, cut some budget from agencies like PU, and put them together to finance emergency response activities.
RPJMD (5 year plan) Regional Disaster Management Plan (RDMP)
RENSTRA (5 year plan)
APBD (annual budget) DPA (budget implementation document)
local government each local government agency
RKPD (annual working plan)
SIMDA (financial information management system)
Planning
Budgeting
-20-
(7) Another case of enhanced capacity applied to actual work is BPBD Tomohon. They are trying
to work with BAPPEDA so that DRR would be mainstreamed in the next RPJMD, which will be
issued a new mayor takes office. (At more than half of all the regencies/municipalities, the
election of mayor is scheduled in December 2015.) Under the limited budget of the local
government in Tomohon, DRR has not necessarily been given a high priority in part because the
emergency funds which the BPBD can count on have been available at the central government.
Now the RDMP has provided the overall picture of DRR activities, which allows BPBD
Tomohon to discuss about priorities with more confidence.
(8) With such active efforts of regency/municipality BPBD, the budget of some BPBDs has actually
been increased. At provincial level, BPBD SULUT and NTB have been able to secure budget as
the Governors are supportive of DRR. Provincial BPBDs don’t have budget to directly support
the activities of regency/municipality BPBD, but provincial BPBD can implement their activities
at regency/municipality, thereby being capable of supporting regency/municipality BPBDs.
BPBD Total staff number activity budget (not including non-direct spending such as salary and office operation)
BPBD SULUT
increased from 80 to 100 Activity budgets are: 2 billion IDR (2014) and 8 billion IDR (2015). In 2015, BPBD will build a new four-floor building for an operation room and storehouse at the backyard of the same property.
BPBD Bitung
Total staff number decreased from 76 (2012) to 68 (2015). The number of permanent officers, however, is the same while more staff is being outsourced, whose number is currently stand at 28.
1.1 billion IDR (2012), 3.2 billion IDR (2013), 3.1 billion IDR (2014), 6.2 billion IDR (2015) In 2015, BPBD will purchase fire-fighting cars, construct a new logistic building, and conduct preparedness activity.
BPBD Tomohon
Total staff number has been the same at 66 (permanent 52, temporal 14) from 2012 through 2015, including fire fighters.
1.1 billion IDR (2012), 3.0 billion IDR (2013), 3.0 billion IDR (2014), 2.2 billion IDR (2015) In 2015, more budget was diverted to non-direct spending for salary increase.
BPBD NTB
Total staff number is constant at 63 (42 permanent and 21 temporal) increasingly reliant on temporal staff as the number of permanent officers is limited these days. Coordination is increasing.
Activity budget of BPBD NTB increased from 1.7 billion IDR (2014) to 6.5 billion IDR (2015) by about 400%. Priorities include enhancement of community participation & capacity, early prevention and victim management, disaster emergency preparedness, rehabilitation and reconstruction.
BPBD Sumbawa west
103 (permanent 24, temporal on contract 21, fire fighter 48 mostly on contract). BPBD established in 2010.
Total 2.0 billion IDR (2015). This also include travel fee for BPBD staff to attend the project workshop.
BPBD Lombok Central
Total 113: permanent 30, fire fighters 52 (permanent 27, temporal 25), quick response team 31 (all temporal) BPBD established in 2013
2.6 billion IDR (2013), 3.2 billion IDR (2014), 3.6 billion IDR (2015)
-21-
BPBD Lombok East
Total 82: permanent 52 (including 26 fire fighter), contract-base 30 (including 1 fire fighter). 80(2014), below 80 (2013)
10 billion (2015) including non-direct spending (e.g. salary). Major items are the purchase of fire-fighting car (3.9 billion IDR), Rehabilitation and reconstruction, training cost (0.1 billion IDR)
(9) At present, MoHA, administering local government, is intending to strengthen DRR activities of
the local government with new legislation. The category of activities and budget account system
for local government under MoHA regulations didn’t cover DRR, and this made it difficult for
BPBDs to prepare budget for DRR. Now DRR has become an obligation of local government
with the Law No.23-2014, the appendix of which describes the demarcation of works on disaster
management and fire-fighting between central, provincial, and regency/municipality government.
Furthermore, MoHA ministerial regulation No.27-2014 (with the Appendix point No. 19) on how
to prepare the budget for 2015, explains what is DRR (e.g. evacuation, emergency response), thus
prompting the local government to prepare budget for DRR activities. These descriptions are
still general , so MoHA is planning to issue another ministerial regulation with further
clarification and instruction on DRR within this year. MoHA even considers conducting training
on local government budget planning so that DRR activities can be properly accommodated in
SIMDA.
(10) Through the newly published Middle Term Development Plan 2015-2019, Indonesia has
committed itself to focus its development efforts from the periphery, from the village level.
Budget allocation for village governments has been approved through Law No. 6/2014 on Village,
and it is expected that bigger funds will trickle down from the central government to village
governments. In agreement with the new development strategy, DRR stakeholders will make
use of this opportunity to increase village and community-based DRR initiatives7.
(11) Based on the experience of project activities, many disaster exercises were conducted voluntarily
by BPBDs in SULUT as already reviewed at the Project Purpose indicators. In particular, the
CPX in October 2013 organized by BPBD SULUT were also covered widely by the media such
as Manado Post, Pacific-TV (local TV station based in Manado), TV LI (national TV station),
Metro TV (Indonesia’s news channel). BPBD SULUT is also initiating cooperation with
Telkomsel (mobile network operator in Indonesia) in recognition of the importance of
disseminating disaster information effectively.
7 Ibid no 3
-22-
(12) At the time of actual disasters, some BPBDs were able to better respond due to the Project
particular in terms of disaster data collection and coordination among agencies.
BPBD Events/date BPBD’s response in relation to Project activities/outputs
BPBD SULUT
Flash flood in Manado in Jan 2014
・ Outputs of the Project (data collection format, hazard maps) were useful.
・ Coordination among agencies were easier and smoother because of workshop (BPBD SULUT doesn’t have SOP yet and plans to prepare a SOP in 2016)
BPBD Bitung Flood in 5-10 Feb 2015
・ Due to intensive socialization conducted before, some heads of villages started responding quickly.
・ Division of responsibility as described in SOP helped the emergency response go smoothly.
・ The reporting format prepared by the project was used.
・ Bitung municipality set up the operation room in BPBD. Bitung conducted most of response activities on their own with budget, and asked little to BNPB.
BPBD Manado
Flood Jan 2014
・ The data format was helpful for BPBD Manado to collect flood information at Dasa level.
(13) Apart from RDMPs, the hazard and risk map, the first official map of its kind at
regency/municipality level in the target provinces, are widely appreciated by BPBDs. BPBDs
shared the developed maps with other relevant agencies such as PU, TNI, PVMBG, and PMKG.
Some BPBD officers said the maps being precise made them more confident to share those with
other agencies, whereas other BPBD officers mentioned the maps were too technical and not easy
to understand. One concern raised at the Mid-term review was how the creation of hazard map
with GIS equipment would be sustained by the provincial BPBD since the work had been mainly
conducted by GIS engineers contracted by the Project. When activities in SULUT were
completed in March 2014, the GIS equipment was handed over to the BPBD SULUT dated on 28
March 2014. Two BPBD officers have since been assigned to the GIS sections together with 1
GIS engineer on contract basis. They used GIS equipment and managed to produce a relocation
map in 2014. They also have some specific budget allocated to buy consumables such as toner
and printing paper. As such, BPBD SULUT is putting their efforts to sustain the GIS corner. It
is desirable that provincial/regency/municipal BPBDs can make these maps by themselves and
that the prepared maps can be agreed by all SKPD. It is also necessary that the prepared maps
are socialized to communities in danger.
-23-
(14) Followings are the recommendation made at the mid-term review in September 2013, and their
response in the Project to the present.
Area Recommendation Response 1. Remaining
Activities in North Sulawesi Province
Kab/Kota BPBDs to participate in the workshop and complete the formulation of RDMPs by March 2014.
Workshop was conducted twice after the Mid-term review (Sep 2013 and Mar 2014). The formulation of RDMPs was completed in all Kab/Kota in SULUT by November 2014 due to follow-up activities.
Efforts for RDMPs to be approved by local authorities.
All 14 RDMPs in SULUT were already approved by BPBDs. 9 out of 14 were also approved by mayor.
Implementation of disaster risk reduction measures based on RDMPs with cooperation between BPBDs and relevant authorities.
Bitung is implementing activities based on RDMP in 2015 in good cooperation with relevant agencies. Tomohon is also able to implement activities based on RDMP, but disaster management are not given high priority under the current limited city budget.
Follow up by JICA Expert Team for remaining activities in North Sulawesi Province.
Local consultant visited 10 Kab/Kota in SULUT in May and October 2014 to help BPBDs complete the RDMP formulation.
2. Implementation Policy of the 2nd half of the Project
Following approaches to be considered. (1) Focus on a mechanism to
strengthen capacity of BNPB and the Assistant Team
(2) Reconsideration of the methodology of implementing activities in the 2nd pilot province, in accordance with BNPB’s policy.
BPBD used to promote RDMP formulation at Kab/Kota level utilizing national consultants, which were supervised by BNPB Assistant Team. This dissemination approach of BNPB, however, has been halted for a while. In the meantime, the Project has conducted activities in NTB with the same implementation arrangement as those in SULUT.
3. Modification of the Project Design Matrix (PDM)
Addition to PDM of following activities (Outputs) Mechanism for
nationwide dissemination of Outputs of the Project is enhanced.
(Activities) ・ Utilizing the Technical
Guideline. ・ Strengthening the capacity of
BNPB, Assistant Team, province/regency/municipality BPBD, involving national consulting firms.
The output and relevant activities were added to PDM upon approval at the 4th JCC in April 2014. The dissemination mainly focuses on: 1) the utilization of the Technical
Guideline for Formulation of RDMP; and
2) the methodology of earthquake hazard map
4. Collaboration with relevant agencies
Relevant agencies such as PU, BMKG, RISTEK, BPPT, LIPI and CVGHM to be added as members of JCC to promote cross sectorial coordination
The 4th JCC in April 2014 were attended by relevant agencies such as PU, BPPT, PVMBG, PPKK, and PMI. Invitation was actually sent out to other agencies as list in the recommendations.
-24-
3.3 Efficiency
The efficiency of the Project to date is high.
(1) The Project has been implemented without encountering major obstacles (such as described in the
Important Assumptions in PDM), and has been undertaken efficiently. The purpose and
activities of the Project are well understood among those who are participated in the Project.
Official and daily communication among project team and counterpart have been good. JCC
meeting has been held 4 times (18 Jan 2012, 11 Jul 2012, 12 Sep 2013, and 3 Apr 2014). The
project team was based in the target province (at Manado in SULUT and Mataram in NTB), but
efforts of the team to visit or stay in Jakarta for reporting and consulting with BNPB regularly
have kept the Project Managers at BNPB well informed.
(2) Counterpart training in Japan (September 2012 and August 2014) can be highlighted as
particularly effective to inspire counterpart. There were many positive remarks by those who
had participated in the training, saying that the training was eye-opening, having them conscious
about disaster prevention and preparedness for the first time, and having them realized how much
communities/residents could do for themselves for disaster management. It was also pointed out
that the timing of the training was helpful to prepare budget for the next fiscal year based on what
was learned in Japan. For example, BPBD NTB, soon after coming back from the training in
Japan in September 2014, explained the governor about mainstreaming disaster management in
policies. Then, the governor wrote a letter to BAPPEDA to take that into consideration in
preparing 2015 budget, which consequently increased by 400% for BPBD NTB. For the budget
of 2016, BPBD NTB already plans to prepare a proposal on disaster management to be discussed
at MUSRENBANG at provincial level.
(3) Contribution of the local consultants in the project team is significant and highly commended by
Japanese experts and by counterparts. Working with 2 provincial BPBDs and all the 15 and 10
regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT and NTB, respectively, in close cooperation with BNPB
in Jakarta, requires lots of efforts for communication, consultation and follow-up. The number
of counterparts reaches almost 400 (31 from BNPB, 246 from BPBDs in SULUT and 115 from
BPBDs in NTB). Keeping all the counterparts informed of and engaged in project activities
would not be possible without dedicated efforts of local consultants. On the other hand,
targeting all the regencies/municipalities in target provinces are beneficial for BPBD officers to
have opportunities for exchanging information and learning among themselves. For example, at
a workshop, BPBD officers of Sitaro and Tomohon were able to discuss about volcano disaster
management. It has also caused healthy competitive spirit among BPBD staff.
-25-
(4) At the mid-term review, some BPBDs in SULUT expressed that the limited budget was a
constraint, which kept them from traveling and attending the workshop held by the Project in
Manado. All regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT shouldered expenses for travel in
accordance with the MOU on Cost Sharing for Holding Workshops, signed between BPBD
SULUT and the Project in October 2012. Such arrangement ought to be acknowledged as a
remarkable contribution from Indonesian side to project implementation. This was raised,
however, as a hindering factor for project implementation by some BPBDs that were not able to
cover the expense due to the inflexibility of local budgeting. On the other hand, this
arrangement was not raised as an issue in NTB partly because they made themselves better
prepared for project implementation. For example, BPBD West Sumbawa prepared such budget
for 2014 soon after the Project visited their office in June 2013 and explained project activities.
(5) One notable hindering factor mentioned is the frequent transfer of counterpart, though this hasn’t
significantly affected the project implementation. Project Director changed twice due to the
transfer of the Deputy of Prevention and Preparedness BNPB (August 2013 and October 2014).
At provincial/regency/municipal BPBDs in SULUT, there were many transfers of directors, too.
Additional explanation of tasks to successors was necessary, and attention was paid so that the
involvement of staff in the Project would be consistent. For example, out of the 15 district/city
BPBDs in SULUT, 8 directors changed from October 2012 to September 2013. 6 out of the 8
transferred BPBD directors actually attended the counterpart training in Japan. This means that
the effects of the training might not be returned to the Project.
(6) Japanese side proposed the Basic Approach in its inception report for effective/efficient
implementation of the Project and technology transfer. Proposed approaches were carried out as
follows while the Project being implemented.
Basic Approach What actually worked in the Project What didn’t work in the Project
1
Focus on assistance in capacity development and implementation of capacity assessment
・ JICA Project Team basically provided only advice, inputs, through WSs and follow up activities to the CPs, and most of actual works had been done by CPs themselves, this methodology contributed to enhance their capacity.
・ Not all CPs are active and motivated and this cause difference in level of understanding among CPs.
・ CPs are changed quite frequently and need extra time to catch up with new CPs.
2
Assuring sustainability looking ahead of the end of the Project
・ Through implementation of the most fundamental and indispensable activities at the local level, their capacity enhanced for the pilot area by prioritizing capacity development.
・ In order to ensure achievement of overall goal of the project, how to effectively utilize methodology applied in the project is not yet been decided with BNPB.
-26-
3 Implementation of effective technical transfer by understanding the relationships between each output
・ Necessity of Components covered in this project are well matched with BNPB policy and well understood by the local BPBDs.
・ Outputs are correlated each other, and CPs are also coordinated with other Outputs CPs for effective implementation of the project.
・ None
4
Implementation of efficient and steady technical transfers by holding regular workshops
・ Technical Transfer to CPs for each output is given step-by-step through series of WSs, and this method was effective to cover all Kab/Kota in the pilot area.
・ For the activity in NTB, for most of outputs, 2 times of WSs were held by island (for Lombok Island, and Sumbawa Island separately) and it also helped to increase level of participation to the WSs.
・ Due to limitation of budget of each Kab/Kota, some of Kab/Kota has difficulty coming to WSs, especially having distance from the Capital (however, not to left them behind individual follow up activities were implemented.)
5 Promotion of establishment of technical transfer committee consists mainly of primary universities
・ Involvement of relevant organizations and local university was promoted in the project and shared data to relevant authorities and organizations to ensure sustainability.
・ Recently, BNPB started to utilize major University separated by target disasters for their involvement and this will continue for the future.
・ This methodology was not accepted at the beginning of the project due to policy of BNPB has not been fixed.
6 Ensure the quality of project outputs by developing clearly comprehensive manuals
・ Development of Technical Guidelines (change title from Manual to Technical Guideline considering Indonesian document hierarchy) was effective since there were no detail documents to be able to utilize and understand by local governments and can be utilized at other region.
・ Activity at pilot area was conducted by utilizing Technical Guideline formulated through implementation of activity at the 1st pilot area, and matured and revised the contents through implementation of 2nd Pilot area through discussion with BNPB.
・ Not yet officially ensured to use as official documents by BNPB
7 Implementation of effective public relations activities
・ Periodical Issuance of Newsletter was effective to disseminate and share the progress of the project among CPs, relevant organizations.
・ HP of the project was helped to disseminate progress and achievement of the project as well as share materials provided in the project.
・ SNS such as Facebook was utilized to share information of holding WSs, Seminars, and other events, and effective to receiving confirmation of attendance in advance, to handle great number of CPs in the project.
・ None
-27-
3.4 Impacts
The impact of the Project is medium.
(1) A key positive impact, which is the progress towards achieving the Overall Goal - disaster
management capacities of provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs beside the target areas are
enhanced - has not really been observed as yet at the time of terminal evaluation. So far, the
Project has been quite successful within the target province of SULUT and NTB, but impact
beyond the target province is yet to be made. Output 5 (dissemination of technical guideline on
RDMP formulation) was added to PDM to bridge between the Project Purpose and the Overall
Goal at the time of Mid-term review. BNPB highly regarded the outputs of the Project and
confirmed that they would disseminate the outputs to other provinces once they were finalized
and approved. With such confirmation of BNPB, it is expected that activities of Output 5 will
bring about more impact during the remaining project period. Furthermore, the Project is
aligned and concurrent with BNPB’s initiatives and activities (e.g. formulation of RDMP at
regency/municipality level, Disaster Resilient Village Program, etc), and hence can cause many
positive impacts in future.
(2) There are some remarkable events/presentations conducted by the Project and counterpart as
follows based on the activities and experience of the Project:
・ In recognition of the activities of the Project, Joint Seminar on Volcanic Activity and
Enhancement of Disaster Management Capacity in North Sulawesi Province was conducted on 24
may 2013 at Manado. The Seminar was organized by BNPB, North Sulawesi BPBD and JICA
Project Team with significant participants such as the Governor of North Sulawesi Province,
Head of PVMBG, Director of Water Resources in PU, Director of Preparedness in BNPB, Kyoto
University, and Kagoshima Prefecture.
・ Presentation at a JICA side event of Asia Ministerial Conference on DRR (23 June 2014,
Thailand)
・ Presentation at WCDRR Sendai, Japan (14-18 March 2015) as “Mainstreaming DRR into
Development through practical DM Planning at the Local Level: Lessons Learned from BNPB
and JICA initiatives in Indonesia” and “Building Resilience at the Local Level: Experiences from
Indonesia and Japan”
(3) Based on the experience of the Project, BPBD SULUT is taking initiative to promote DRR
activities with relevant organizations by signing MOUs as below.
-28-
Agency which MOU was signed with by BPBD SULUT
Date of signature
Activities of BPBD SULUT
PKK (women’s group) February 2014 PKK are conducting many social activities at community level. BPBD may use that opportunity to disseminate DM knowledge.
Provincial DINAS (agency) of education
October 2014 BPBD may come to high school to disseminate some knowledge on DM. Target is 100 high school while no specific budget is prepared at BPBD.
IPDN Manado (school for government staff)
March 2015 BPBD may come to IPDN Manado and give lectures to the students of future leaders.
(4) BNPB is promoting many activities; for example, 1) preparation of a strategy plan this year for
DRR movement inviting private sector and NGO, 2) development of a project in a small island
for cluster coordination with relevant ministries/agencies and to organize communities, 3)
formulation of five master plans (Tsunami, Flood, Volcano Eruption, Earthquake, Landslide) to be
attached to the National Disaster Management Plan, and each master plan is being supported by
respective university for risk assessment, 4) development of the substance of training module at
the Ina-DRTG to fully utilize the training center, 5) organizing regular meetings where BPBDs
convene three times a year (Technical Coordination Meeting, Scientific Meeting for DRR, and
DRR Month)
3.5 Sustainability
The prospect of sustainability of the Project is high with precondition.
(1) With regard to BPBDs surveyed in the terminal evaluation in SULUT and NTB (two provincial
BPBDs and regency/municipality BPBDs in Bitung, Tomohon, Manado, Central Lombok, East
Lombok, Mataram), the prospect of sustainability is high. Through the Project, the capacity of
some BPBDs is enhanced at not only the individual or organizational level, but also at the
institutional level. It should be note, however, that such prospect of sustainability may vary with
different leadership, willingness of the government, and governing the risk at local levels are very
challenging. It will be vary also for other regency/municipality BPBDs in accordance with the
level of their capacity, which is summarized in the Capacity Assessment Report in SULUT
compiled in the Project in December 2014 (Also, the same capacity assessment for
regency/municipality BPBDs in NTB in currently ongoing.) Concerning the CBDRM
conducted in the two pilot villages (Desa Moyag in Kotamobagu and Kelurahan Bebali in Sitaro),
the continuation of activities is not clear because these two regencies were not visited during the
terminal evaluation. BNPB intends to mainstream DRR at the local level, and their supports to
BPBDs are expected in accordance with RPJMN (2015-2019) and upcoming NDMP (2015-2019).
Observation and analysis from four viewpoints (institutional, technical, human resource,
financial) are described below.
-29-
(2) Institutional viewpoint
The national and international policy environments are instrumental in promoting DRR and
extending project benefits/activities. The statement at WCDRR by the vice-president of
Indonesia in March 2015 maintains that Indonesia has been investing in disaster prevention,
mitigation, and preparedness and that it is now becoming their top list priority. The RPJMN
(2015-2019) puts high priority to DRR as public investment. The National Disaster
Management Plan (2015-2019), currently being prepared to align with the RPJMN, is expected to
have specific targets such as reducing existing risk and preventing new disaster risks. As such,
the institutional and regulatory framework for DRR in Indonesia has been increasingly
strengthened. This includes BNPB regulations and particularly MoHA regulations for
regency/municipality BPBDs.
BNPB and BPBDs meet three times a year regularly as the following table. The provincial
BPBD and regency/municipality BPBDs also meet twice a year by holding a technical
coordination meeting at the provincial BPBD. The communication and coordination will be
better sustained using such opportunities.
Meeting Time Main Agenda Technical coordination meeting
Early year General meeting of BNPB and BPBDs
Scientific meeting for DRR
May-June Researchers in Ministries and Indonesia Disaster Expert Association discuss on the concept/science of DRR
DRR Month October Chance for socialization of DRR activities and results
The coordination and cooperation of BPBD with relevant stakeholders are also being
strengthened at local level. Some cases of such good coordination by BPBDs in the target
provinces are as described in the previous sections such as cooperation in emergency response,
sharing of hazard map, and preparation of budget. There is also a case of national level
coordination. For example, in Sumbawa West, 135 evacuation sign and 20evacuation points
were installed in 2015 in a BPBD project. Concurrently, PU will build some three-stories shelter
along the Nusa Tenggara Timor coast in 2016.
(3) Technical viewpoint
Activities in outputs such as the development of RDMPs are more likely to be sustained as
these RDMPs are formulated by regency/municipality BPBD staff themselves through working
with the processes of project implementation, rather than contracted out to external entities such
as consulting companies. Not just learning how to formulate RDMP but also demonstrating
their learning by actually creating RDMP until its approval has led to significant capacity
development of BPBD staff. At some BPBDs, the enhanced capacities have been applied to
actual work such as budget preparation, voluntary disaster management exercises, and response to
-30-
natural disaster events.
How the activities of creating and revising hazard and risk maps with GIS equipment
continue to be a concern even after the arrangement set up at BPBD SULUT (i.e. hand-over of the
GIS equipment, assignment of staff to GIS corner, and budget). Some agencies are likely to
have better GIS technical capacities than BPBD SULUT (e.g. BAPEDA for special planning, PU
for flood control, BMKG for weather forecast, Sam Ratulangi University of North Sulawesi for
academic use). The data on disaster risk assessment for GIS can be shared with these
institutions towards possible collaboration on creating or revising hazard maps. There may be
the same concern in BPBD NTB, but they seem to better handle GIS due to more exposure to
development projects before as well as more available budget.
(4) Human Resources viewpoint
The capacity of BPBD counterpart has been remarkably increased through the Project.
Continuous involvement, after the Project, of BPBD counterpart in the same disaster management
activities cannot be counted on because transfer of BPBD staff is common. However,
clarification of duty/tasks of BPBD, increased understanding and awareness of staff on DRR in
general, and development of basic referential materials such as RDMP have all contributed to the
increased sustainability of BPBD human resource as a whole. Knowledge sharing among BPBD
colleagues is increasing and collaboration with other organization such as Red Cross is being
realized at local level. Training opportunities of BPBD staff are increasing as more BPBDs have
managed to secure training budget as planned in RDMP (BNPB has training and BPBD secure
some budget for their staff to travel and participate in the training). Furthermore,
regency/municipality BPBDs have seen the increase of staff in general, both permanent and
temporal, since its establishment.
(5) Financial viewpoint
The sustainability from financial viewpoint is promising for BPBDs. BNPB does not have
an administrative responsibility over BPBDs which are a part the local government under MoHA.
BNPB primarily supports BPBDs through setting policies and guidelines, granting
equipment/facilities, and imparting technical skills/knowledge in many aspects of DRR. As for
MoHA, they used to prepare a ministerial regulation that would allow the local government to use
1% of APBD for DRR, but this idea was already discarded. Instead, MoHA has prepared the
Law No.23-2014 and the ministerial regulation No.27-2014, thereby enforcing the local
government to promote DRR activities with budget. Furthermore, MoHA is considering another
ministerial regulation, within this year, to secure the preparation of budget for DRR in the local
government financial information management system, SIMDA.
-31-
Chapter 4: Recommendation
4.1 Conclusion of the Review by the Five Criteria
The relevance of the Project remains high, aligned with government policies on DRR such as the
Law No.24-2007, RPJMN (2015-2019), and relevant BNPB’s regulations though the National Disaster
Management Plan (2015-2019) is still under finalization. The effectiveness of the Project is high
because the Project is making a firm progress, and by continuing the current activities as planned, it is
more likely that the Project Purpose will be achieved by the end of cooperation period, November 2015.
The efficiency of the Project is assessed also high as the Project has not encountered major obstacle that
could seriously hinder the project implementation. The impact of the Project is medium at present.
Advancement towards the Overall Goal based on the achievements of the Project to date has not really
been realized as yet, but activities for the extension of project outputs are ongoing, and BNPB’s
commitment to utilize project outputs are clear. The prospect of sustainability is high with preconditions
for the provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT and NTB while BNPB and MoHA are
promoting DRR into the local level.
4.2 Recommendations
4.2.1 Completion of all project activities.
The Project is to achieve the Project Purpose by November 2015 by continuing planned activities
while paying particular attention to the following.
・ Wrap-up workshop in NTB scheduled in September 2015 is to be planned as most effective to share
experience and knowledge among BNPB and province/regency/municipality BPBDs from NTB as
well as from SULUT. Tambora can be considered a good option for socialization of DRR among
relevant agencies and the media.
・ The approval or authorization of six technical guidelines (e.g. Technical Guideline for formulation of
RDMP) in accordance with relevant BNPB regulations is necessary for these tangible outputs to be
effectively disseminated and utilized for the enhancement of regency/municipality BPBDs beyond
the target provinces.
・ The annual BPBD general meeting in October 2015 needs to be a good occasion for activities of
Output 5. For example, distributing the technical guideline with training seminar, sharing good
practice of target regency/municipality BPBDs with others, providing lectures on DRR planning and
budgeting based on MoHA legislation, can be considered as a part of agenda..
-32-
4.2.2 Promotion and implementation of regency/municipality RDMP
In order to implement RDMP, following actions (indicative) should be undertaken as necessary by
provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs, referring to the good practices of some BPBDs as described
in previous sections.
・ Communication on the RDMP with cooperating authorities/agencies such as the local parliament,
mayors, local government organs such as in health and public works, army, police, and NGOs for
implementing RDMP.
・ Budget preparation based on RDMP while communicating with relevant authorizes/agencies in line
with MoHA regulations so that the budget on DRR to be duly prioritized and properly
accommodated in SIMDA.
・ Socialization of hazard and risk maps to agencies with GIS technical capacities (e.g. BAPEDA, PU,
BMKG, Sam Ratulangi University of North Sulawesi) for possible collaboration on creation/revision
of GIS map based on disaster risk assessment.
4.2.3 Discussion with BNPB on the way-forward to the Overall Goal
Way-forward to the Overall Goal based on the achievements of the Project requires discussions with
and engagement of BNPB on top of some activities undertaken as Output 5. Exceedingly competing
duties/time of BNPB counterparts have made their involvement in the Project rather limited than initially
expected even though their engagement in the Project is clear. Still, the way-forward is to be agreed
during the remaining project period toward achieving the overall goal. This is also important from the
viewpoint of sustainability of project outputs. Utilization of technical guideline and methodology such
as creating hazard maps is one of the essentials for enhancing the disaster management capacity of BNPB
and BPBDs, and it will not be sustained without a long-term perspective and multi-faceted approach.
・ Utilization of technical guideline as a part of training module in Ina-DRTG, after these guideline are
authorized, can be considered.
・ BNPB can assist BPBDs to mainstream DRR into the local government development plan. Also,
BNPB can liaise with MoHA to support BPBDs preparing budget for DRR.
・ The guideline for the Standard Operation Procedures (SOP) had been made, including Output 3-2
which can be implemented for other locations in Indonesia. Drill and exercise with related
characteristic can be replicated to other districs involving more stakeholders in DRR.
・ Gender mainstreaming and vulnerable groups should be more involved in CBDRM and drill exercise
for better resilience of the community in local level.
・ The involvement of the all local stakeholders, including the government for Community
Development and Private Sectors will be important as part of the output for the programs.
・ The Risk Reduction Index should be utilized as part of evaluation measurement tool to reduce
disaster risks significantly over the period of middle-phase development, as the RPJMN has stated.
-33-
4.3 Lessons Learned
(1) Training in Japan was repeatedly mentioned very fruitful by those participated, some of whom
had been highly inspired and taken great initiative to promote DRR activities in their provinces
and regencies. Regarding DRR technical cooperation, training in Japan seems to have the best
advantage the participants can learn compared with training in other third countries.
(2) Counterpart from the 1st target province (SULUT) actively participated in the 2nd target province
(NTB) activities. He shared his experience in the Project and relevant achievement with the
counterpart in NTB. Thus, counterpart from preceding target areas can become a resource person
for activities in following target areas, and this can be included in a project design from the
beginning.
(3) Efforts of some BPBDs were significant in this Project. It is important to consider, in early stage
of a project, how such exemplary efforts at local level, when emerged, can be disseminated and
extended nationwide.
(4) In this Project, local disaster management agencies (BPBDs) are not under the line administration
of Central disaster management agency (BNPB). BPBDs belong to the local government, which
is under MoHA. In other countries, local disaster management is undertaken by the local branch
of the central disaster management agency (e.g. Office of Civil Defense in the Philippines).
Such difference of administrative arrangement of DRR institution is to be taken into consideration
and reflected in the project design.
Appendices
A.1 PDM Ver.2 A.2 Plan of Operation Ver.2 A.3 Schedule of the Terminal Evaluation A.4 List of Interviewees A.5 Dispatch of Japanese Experts A.6 Provision of Equipment A.7 Counterpart Training A.8 Assignment of Counterpart Personnel A.9 Operation Budget A.10 Result Grid (Achievement of Indicators) A.11 List of Documents developed in the Project A.12 Evaluation Grid (Information and Data for the 5 Criteria) A.13 Signed Minutes of Meeting
A-1
Ap
pen
dix
1:
Pro
ject
Des
ign
Mat
rix
(PD
M)
(Dra
ft)
(Ver
.2)
Dat
e: 3
Ap
ril
2014
P
roje
ct N
ame:
The
Pro
ject
for
Enh
ance
men
t of
the
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Cap
acit
y of
BN
PB
and
BP
BD
P
roje
ct T
erm
: 201
1 -
2015
(fo
ur y
ears
) Ta
rget
are
a (p
ilot
pro
vinc
es):
Nor
th S
ulaw
esi P
rovi
nce
(Man
ado
Mun
icip
alit
y an
d ot
her
rege
ncie
s/m
unic
ipal
itie
s), W
est
Nu
sa T
engg
ara
Pro
vinc
e (M
atar
am M
unic
ipal
ity
and
othe
r re
genc
ies/
mun
icip
alit
ies)
Ta
rget
gro
up: N
atio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent A
genc
y (B
NP
B);
at l
east
two
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Age
ncie
s (B
PB
Ds)
of
two
prov
ince
s: N
orth
Sul
awes
i Pro
vinc
e, W
est
Nu
sa T
engg
ara
Pro
vinc
e; a
nd th
e R
egen
cy/M
unic
ipal
ity
BP
BD
s in
the
targ
et a
rea
(pil
ot p
rovi
nces
)
Nar
rati
ve S
umm
ary
Ver
ifia
ble
Indi
cato
rs
Mea
ns o
f V
erif
icat
ion
Impo
rtan
t Ass
umpt
ions
O
vera
ll G
oal
The
pro
vinc
ial B
PB
Ds
as w
ell a
s th
e re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
BP
BD
s be
side
the
targ
et a
reas
are
est
abli
shed
, and
the
disa
ster
man
agem
ent c
apac
itie
s of
them
are
en
hanc
ed b
y us
ing
mat
eria
ls f
orm
ula
ted
an
d m
eth
odol
ogy
esta
bli
shed
in th
e pr
ojec
t.
The
num
ber
of p
rovi
nces
as
wel
l as
rege
ncie
s/m
unic
ipal
itie
s th
at a
pply
the
met
hodo
logi
es e
stab
lish
ed in
the
Pro
ject
for
ac
cum
ulat
ing
disa
ster
dat
a, c
reat
ing
haza
rd a
nd r
isk
map
s,
form
ulat
ing
regi
onal
dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t pla
n an
d co
nduc
ting
dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t exe
rcis
e.
1. I
nter
view
s w
ith
the
BN
PB
and
BP
BD
st
aff
Dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t fr
amew
ork
by c
urre
nt
disa
ster
-rel
ated
org
aniz
atio
ns
as w
ell a
s di
sast
er-r
elat
ed
poli
cy in
Ind
ones
ia r
emai
ns
unch
ange
d.P
roje
ct P
urpo
se
The
dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t cap
acit
ies
of B
NP
B, t
he p
rovi
ncia
l BP
BD
s, a
nd th
e re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
BP
BD
s in
the
targ
et a
rea
are
enha
nced
. 1.
Num
ber
or C
ases
that
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n (R
DM
P)
form
ulat
ed th
roug
h th
e P
roje
ct p
roce
ssed
to
app
rove
by
the
loca
l aut
hori
ty.
2. N
umbe
r of
vol
unta
ry d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent e
xerc
ises
co
nduc
ted
in t
he
com
mu
nit
ies
wit
hin
th
e ta
rget
are
a.
1. P
rovi
nce
or
Reg
ency
/mun
icip
alit
y ac
know
led
gem
ents
2. B
NP
B o
r B
PB
D r
epor
ts, n
ewsp
aper
ar
ticl
es o
n th
ese
case
s, o
r in
terv
iew
ing
the
com
mun
ity
BN
BP
exte
nds
its
acti
viti
es in
th
e ta
rget
are
a to
oth
er
prov
inci
al B
PB
Ds,
re
genc
ies/
mun
icip
alit
ies
outs
ide
the
targ
et a
reas
.
Out
puts
1.
The
cap
acit
y fo
r th
e re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
BP
BD
s to
acc
umul
ate
disa
ster
da
ta/i
nfor
mat
ion
whi
ch a
re f
unda
men
tal f
or d
isas
ter
risk
man
agem
ent a
nd
impr
ove
accu
racy
of
such
dat
a/in
form
atio
n in
the
targ
et a
rea
is e
nh
ance
d.
2. T
he
cap
acit
y fo
r cr
eati
on o
f H
azar
d an
d ri
sk m
aps
at r
egen
cy/m
unic
ipal
ity
leve
l in
the
targ
et a
rea
is e
nh
ance
d.
3. T
he
cap
acit
y fo
r fo
rmu
lati
on o
f R
egio
nal d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent p
lans
for
re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
in th
e ta
rget
are
a is
en
han
ced
. 4.
Th
e ca
pac
ity
for
con
du
ctin
g D
isas
ter
man
agem
ent e
xerc
ises
at t
he
rege
ncy/
mun
icip
alit
y in
the
targ
et a
rea
is e
nh
ance
d.
5.
Nat
ionw
ide
dis
sem
inat
ion
act
ivit
ies
are
imp
lem
ente
d.
1-
1.A
ccum
ulat
ion
of d
isas
ter
data
item
s (N
ewly
acc
umul
ated
si
nce
ther
e ar
e no
exi
stin
g da
ta)
in t
he
targ
et a
rea.
1-
2.Im
prov
emen
t of
disa
ster
dat
a qu
alit
y (B
y fo
llow
ing
the
form
at, d
ata
are
suff
icie
ntly
acc
umul
ated
) in
th
e ta
rget
ar
ea.
2-1.
Num
ber
of th
e re
genc
ies/
mun
icip
alit
ies
whe
re h
azar
d an
d ri
sk m
aps
at r
egen
cy/m
unic
ipal
ity
leve
l are
cre
ated
in th
e ta
rget
are
a.
3-1.
Num
ber
of th
e re
genc
ies/
mun
icip
alit
ies
whe
re r
egio
nal
disa
ster
man
agem
ent p
lans
are
for
mul
ated
at
rege
ncy/
mun
icip
alit
y le
vel i
n th
e ta
rget
are
a.
4-1.
Num
ber
of d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent e
xerc
ises
impl
emen
ted
in th
e ta
rget
are
a.
4-2.
Num
ber
of a
ctiv
itie
s on
CB
DR
M in
the
targ
et a
rea.
5-
1.T
ech
nic
al G
uid
elin
e fo
r fo
rmu
lati
on o
f R
DM
P is
u
tili
zed
as
refe
ren
ce d
ocu
men
ts o
f B
NP
B
5-2.
Nu
mb
er o
f ev
ents
to
sup
por
t n
atio
nwid
e d
isse
min
atio
n a
ctiv
itie
s on
for
mu
lati
on o
f R
DM
P
1-
1. P
roje
ct r
epor
ts
1-2.
Pro
ject
rep
orts
2-1.
Pro
ject
rep
orts
3-1.
Pro
ject
rep
orts
4-1.
Pro
ject
rep
orts
4-
2. P
roje
ct r
epor
ts
5-1.
Pro
ject
rep
orts
5-
2. P
roje
ct r
epor
ts
Act
ivit
ies
1-1.
To s
tudy
con
tent
s of
dis
aste
r da
ta/i
nfor
mat
ion
to b
e ac
quir
ed a
nd
accu
mul
ated
at a
regi
onal
leve
l (re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
leve
l) in
the
targ
et a
rea
base
d on
the
less
ons
lear
ned
from
the
JIC
A S
tudy
, "T
he S
tudy
on
Nat
ural
D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent i
n In
done
sia
(the
JIC
A S
tudy
)" in
ord
er to
est
abli
sh
form
at f
or s
hari
ng d
isas
ter
data
1-
2.To
stu
dy n
eces
sary
dat
a ite
ms
as w
ell a
s da
ta f
orm
at to
be
shar
ed a
nd in
form
ed
to th
e pr
ovin
cial
BPB
Ds
from
the
rege
ncy/
mun
icip
ality
BPB
Ds
in th
e ta
rget
ar
ea, a
nd in
form
ed to
the
BN
PB fr
om th
e pr
ovin
cial
BPB
Ds
in th
e ta
rget
are
a in
or
der t
o es
tabl
ish
the
met
hodo
logy
for
acc
umul
atin
g ne
cess
ary
data
Inpu
ts(1
) T
rain
ed s
taff
con
tinu
es to
w
ork
for B
NP
B o
r BP
BD
. (2
) St
atus
of
disa
ster
m
anag
emen
t pla
n re
mai
ns u
ncha
nged
. (3
) R
elat
ion
amon
g th
e re
leva
nt o
rgan
izat
ions
re
mai
ns u
ncha
nged
. (4
) In
form
atio
n is
sha
red
wit
hin
the
Pro
ject
team
(Ind
ones
ian
side
) 1.
Ass
ignm
ent o
f co
unte
rpar
t per
sonn
el (
C/P
) -P
roje
ct D
irec
tor
(P/D
) fr
om B
NP
B (
Dep
uty
Chi
ef f
or
Pre
vent
ion
and
Pre
pare
dnes
s)
-Pro
ject
Man
ager
s (P
/Ms)
fro
m B
NP
B (
Dir
ecto
r fo
r D
isas
ter
Ris
k R
educ
tion
, Dir
ecto
r fo
r D
isas
ter
Pre
par
edn
ess,
Hea
d
of D
ata,
In
form
atio
n a
nd
Pu
bli
c R
elat
ion
Cen
ter,
D
irec
tor
for
Com
mu
nit
y E
mp
ower
men
t)
(Jap
anes
e si
de)
1. D
ispa
tch
of th
e Ja
pane
se e
xper
ts
-Chi
ef a
dvis
or/ C
ompr
ehen
sive
dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t -R
egio
nal d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent p
lann
ing
(1)
- R
egio
nal
dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t p
lan
nin
g (2
)
Mod
ifica
tions
are
und
erlin
ed a
nd in
bol
d.
A-2
1-3.
To f
orm
ulat
e “T
ech
nic
al g
uid
elin
e fo
r ac
quir
ing
and
accu
mul
atin
g di
sast
er
data
/ inf
orm
atio
n fo
r re
gen
cies
/mu
nic
ipal
itie
s”
1-4.
To a
cqui
re a
nd a
ccum
ulat
e di
sast
er d
ata/
info
rmat
ion
in th
e in
th
e 1st
tar
get
ar
ea u
sing
the
form
at d
evel
oped
thro
ugh
the
Pro
ject
1-
5.To
list
the
disa
ster
dat
a ac
cum
ulat
ed in
the
in t
he
1st t
arge
t ar
ea in
to th
e di
sast
er a
nnua
l rep
ort
2-1.
To s
tudy
and
ver
ify
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
"th
e m
anua
l for
cre
atio
n of
haz
ard
and
risk
map
s", d
evel
oped
thro
ugh
the
JIC
A S
tudy
. 2-
2.To
for
mu
late
“T
ech
nic
al g
uid
elin
e fo
r cr
eati
on o
f h
azar
d m
aps
for
rege
nci
es/m
un
icip
alit
ies”
2-
3.To
col
lect
and
cla
rify
bas
ic d
ata
incl
udin
g st
atis
tics
, soc
ial d
ata,
dat
a on
na
tura
l con
diti
ons
2-4.
To c
reat
e ha
zard
and
risk
map
s ba
sed
on th
e da
ta a
ccum
ulat
ed th
roug
h O
utpu
t 1
as w
ell a
s ba
sic
data
col
lect
ed in
Act
ivit
y 2-
3 2-
5.To
pla
n di
sast
er m
itig
atio
n m
easu
res
base
d on
the
haza
rd a
nd r
isk
map
s cr
eate
d th
roug
h A
ctiv
ity
2-4
as w
ell a
s th
e le
sson
s le
arne
d fr
om th
e R
egio
nal
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n (R
DM
P)
deve
lope
d th
roug
h th
e JI
CA
Stu
dy
3-1.
To f
orm
ula
te “
Tec
hn
ical
gu
idel
ine
for
form
ula
tion
of
regi
onal
dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t p
lan
for
reg
enci
es/m
un
icip
alit
ies”
. 3-
2.To
stu
dy a
bout
rev
isio
n of
Sta
ndar
d O
pera
tion
Pro
cedu
re (
SO
P)
used
co
mm
only
by
rege
ncy/
mun
icip
alit
y in
ord
er to
pre
pare
sta
ndar
d m
anua
l and
fo
rmul
ate
“Tec
hn
ical
gu
idel
ine
for
form
ulat
ion
of S
OP
for
rege
nci
es/m
un
icip
alit
ies”
3-
3.To
col
lect
and
cla
rify
bas
ic d
ata
incl
udin
g st
atis
tics
, soc
ial d
ata,
dat
a on
na
tura
l con
diti
ons
nece
ssar
y fo
r fo
rmul
atin
g R
DM
Ps
for
the
targ
et a
rea
3-4.
To
form
ula
te R
DM
Ps
and
Reg
ion
al A
ctio
n P
lan
s fo
r D
isas
ter
Ris
k
Red
uct
ion
(D
RR
) fo
r th
e ta
rget
are
a 3-
5.T
o fo
rmu
late
or
revi
se S
OP
in t
he
1st t
arge
t ar
ea
3-6.
To
revi
se t
he
exis
tin
g S
OP
acc
ordi
ng to
em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
pla
n of
the
RD
MP
form
ulat
ed th
roug
h th
e A
ctiv
ity
3-4
in t
he
1st t
arge
t ar
ea
3-7.
To
prom
ote
offi
cial
app
rais
al b
y re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
of R
DM
P fo
rmul
ated
th
roug
h A
ctiv
ity
3-4
4-1.
To s
tudy
exi
stin
g do
cum
ents
for
impl
emen
tati
on o
f di
sast
er m
anag
emen
t ex
erci
ses
4-2.
To f
orm
ulat
e “T
ech
nic
al g
uid
elin
e fo
r im
plem
enti
ng d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent
exer
cise
s fo
r re
gen
cies
/mu
nic
ipal
itie
s”
4-3.
To im
plem
ent d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent e
xerc
ises
in th
e 1st
tar
get
area
toge
ther
w
ith
nati
onal
leve
l org
aniz
atio
ns
4-4.
To
revi
se “
Tec
hn
ical
gu
idel
ine
for
imp
lem
enti
ng
dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t ex
erci
ses
for
rege
nci
es/m
un
icip
alit
ies”
as
wel
l as
SO
Ps
base
d on
the
resu
lt o
f th
e di
sast
er m
anag
emen
t exe
rcis
e if
nec
essa
ry
4-5.
To c
ondu
ct a
ctiv
itie
s on
CB
DR
M to
em
pow
er d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent
ca
paci
ty u
tili
zing
out
put f
orm
ulat
ed th
roug
h th
e P
roje
ct
5-1.
To
imp
rove
Tec
hn
ical
gu
idel
ine
for
form
ula
tion
of
RD
MP
to
be
uti
lize
d
as r
efer
ence
doc
um
ent
of B
NP
B
5-2.
To
par
tici
pat
e ev
ents
hos
ted
by
BN
PB
to
exp
lain
eff
ecti
ve u
tili
zati
on o
f th
e T
ech
nic
al G
uid
elin
e fo
r fo
rmu
lati
on o
f R
DM
P
5-3.
To
give
inp
ut
for
form
ula
tion
of
dis
aste
r ri
sk a
sses
smen
t te
chn
ical
gu
idel
ine
for
rege
nci
es/m
un
icip
alit
ies
5-4.
To
pro
mot
e th
e m
eth
odol
ogy
dev
elop
ed in
Ou
tpu
t 2
Act
ivit
y 2.
2 es
pec
iall
y on
Ear
thq
uak
e H
azar
d
-Pro
ject
Coo
rdin
ator
(A
dmin
istr
atio
n) f
rom
BN
PB
(D
irec
tor
for
Bur
eau
for
Law
s an
d C
oope
rati
on)
-Out
put 1
: Te
am L
eade
r (D
eput
y C
hief
of
Dis
aste
r In
form
atio
n,
Div
isio
n of
Inf
orm
atio
n C
ente
r) a
nd n
eces
sary
num
ber
of
staf
f fr
om B
NP
B, a
nd n
eces
sary
num
ber
of s
taff
fro
m
BP
BD
in th
e pi
lot p
rovi
nces
) -O
utpu
t 2:
Te
am L
eade
r (S
ub-d
irec
tor
of P
reve
ntio
n) a
nd n
eces
sary
nu
mbe
r of
sta
ff f
rom
BN
PB
, and
nec
essa
ry n
umbe
r of
sta
ff
from
BP
BD
in th
e pi
lot p
rovi
nces
) -O
utpu
t 3:
Te
am L
eade
r (S
ub-d
irec
tor
of M
itig
atio
n/S
ub-d
irec
tor
of
Pre
vent
ion)
and
nec
essa
ry n
umbe
r of
sta
ff f
rom
BN
PB
, and
ne
cess
ary
num
ber
of s
taff
fro
m B
PB
D in
the
pilo
t pr
ovin
ces)
D
eput
y Te
am L
eade
r (S
ub-d
irec
tor
of R
espo
nse
Pla
nnin
g an
d ne
cess
ary
num
ber
of s
taff
fro
m B
NP
B, a
nd n
eces
sary
nu
mbe
r of
sta
ff f
rom
BP
BD
in th
e pi
lot p
rovi
nces
)
-Out
put 4
:
Team
Lea
der
(Sub
-dir
ecto
r of
Res
ourc
e P
repa
redn
ess)
and
ne
cess
ary
num
ber
of s
taff
fro
m B
NP
B, a
nd n
eces
sary
nu
mbe
r of
sta
ff f
rom
BP
BD
in th
e pi
lot p
rovi
nces
) D
eput
y Te
am L
eade
r (S
ub-d
irec
tor
of C
omm
unit
y E
mpo
wer
men
t) a
nd n
eces
sary
num
ber
of s
taff
fro
m B
NP
B,
and
nece
ssar
y nu
mbe
r of
sta
ff f
rom
BP
BD
in th
e pi
lot
prov
ince
s)
2. P
rovi
sion
of
faci
lity
and
equ
ipm
ent
-Pro
ject
off
ice
spac
e -O
ther
exp
ense
s 3.
Ope
rati
on b
udge
t -P
erso
nnel
exp
ense
s as
wel
l as
allo
wan
ce f
or C
/P
-Exp
end
itu
re t
o h
old
JC
C a
nd
oth
er e
ven
ts in
Jak
arta
-O
ther
exp
ense
s
-Dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t ins
titu
tion
and
or
gani
zati
on
-Em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
pla
nnin
g -D
isas
ter
info
rmat
ion
syst
em
-Dis
aste
r m
itig
atio
n m
easu
res
(flo
od,
land
slid
e, d
roug
ht, d
estr
ucti
ve w
ind,
fo
rest
fir
e)
-Dis
aste
r m
itig
atio
n m
easu
res
(ear
thqu
ake,
tsun
ami,
volc
anic
er
upti
on)
-Dat
abas
e/ G
IS
-Dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t exe
rcis
e (1
) -D
isas
ter
man
agem
ent e
xerc
ise
(2)
-Com
mun
ity
base
d di
sast
er r
isk
man
agem
ent
-Cap
acit
y D
evel
opm
ent
-Coo
rdin
ator
/sup
port
of
the
expe
rt in
co
mm
unit
y ba
sed
disa
ster
ris
k m
anag
emen
t 2.
Pro
visi
on o
f eq
uipm
ent
-Tra
inin
g to
ols
and
mat
eria
ls
-PC
for
pre
pari
ng h
azar
d an
d ri
sk m
aps,
pr
inte
r, G
IS s
oftw
are,
plo
tter
, sat
elli
te
imag
e, a
nd
IF
SA
R d
ata
3. C
ount
erpa
rt tr
aini
ng
-Nec
essa
ry n
umbe
r of
sta
ff is
trai
ned
in
Japa
n on
ce a
yea
r. T
he s
taff
is s
elec
ted
from
BN
PB
as
wel
l as
the
prov
inci
al
and
rege
ncy/
mun
icip
alit
y B
PB
Ds
in th
e ta
rget
are
a.
suff
icie
ntly
.
Pre
-con
diti
ons
(1)
Des
truc
tive
dis
aste
r w
hich
may
gre
atly
af
fect
to th
e sm
ooth
op
erat
ion
of th
e P
roje
ct d
oes
not o
ccur
be
fore
the
Pro
ject
is
com
plet
ed.
(2)
Reg
ular
BN
PB
and
B
PBD
off
icia
ls a
re
assi
gned
to th
e Pr
ojec
t un
der
gove
rnm
ent
orde
r be
fore
the
Proj
ect s
tart
s.
A-3
Ap
pen
dix
2:
Pla
n o
f O
per
atio
n V
er.2
Im
plem
enta
tion
poli
cy w
ith
BN
PB
Act
ivit
y in
the
1st p
ilot
pro
vinc
e of
SU
LU
TA
ctiv
ity
in th
e 2nd
pil
ot p
rovi
nce
of N
TB
20
11
2012
2013
20
14
2015
A
ctiv
ity
Jul -Sep
Oct -Dec
Jan -Mar
Apr -Jun
Jul -Sep
Oct -Dec
Jan -Mar
Apr -Jun
Jul -Sep
Oct -Dec
Jan -Mar
Apr -Jun
Jul -Sep
Oct -Dec
Jan -Mar
Apr -Jun
Jul -Sep
Oct -Nov
1-1
To s
tudy
con
tent
s of
dis
aste
r da
ta/i
nfor
mat
ion
to b
e ac
quir
ed a
nd a
ccum
ulat
ed a
t a r
egio
nal l
evel
(re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
leve
l) in
the
targ
et a
rea
base
d on
the
less
ons
lear
ned
from
the
JIC
A S
tudy
“T
he S
tudy
on
Nat
ural
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t in
Indo
nesi
a (t
he J
ICA
Stu
dy)”
in o
rder
to e
stab
lish
for
mat
for
sha
ring
dis
aste
r da
ta.
1-2
To
stu
dy n
eces
sary
dat
a it
ems
as w
ell a
s da
ta f
orm
at to
be
shar
ed a
nd in
form
ed to
the
prov
inci
al B
PB
Ds
from
the
rege
ncy/
mun
icip
ality
BP
BD
s in
the
targ
et a
rea,
and
info
rmed
to th
e B
NP
B f
rom
the
prov
inci
al B
PBD
s in
the
targ
et a
rea
in o
rder
to e
stab
lish
the
met
hodo
logy
for
acc
umul
atin
g ne
cess
ary
data
.
1-3
To f
orm
ulat
e “T
echn
ical
gui
deli
ne f
or a
cqui
ring
and
acc
umul
atin
g di
sast
er d
ata/
info
rmat
ion
for
rege
ncie
s/m
unic
ipal
itie
s”
1-4
To a
cqui
re a
nd a
ccum
ulat
e di
sast
er d
ata/
info
rmat
ion
in th
e 1st
targ
et a
rea
usin
g th
e fo
rmat
dev
elop
ed th
roug
h th
e Pr
ojec
t.
1-
5 To
list
the
disa
ster
dat
a ac
cum
ulat
ed in
the
1st ta
rget
are
a in
to th
e di
sast
er a
nnua
l rep
ort.
2-1
To s
tudy
and
ver
ify
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
“th
e m
anua
l for
cre
atio
n of
haz
ard
and
risk
map
s”, d
evel
oped
thro
ugh
the
JIC
A S
tudy
.
2-
2 To
for
mul
ate
“Tec
hnic
al g
uide
line
for
crea
tion
of
haza
rd m
aps
for
rege
ncie
s/m
unic
ipal
itie
s”
2-3(
1) T
o co
llec
t and
cla
rify
bas
ic d
ata
incl
udin
g st
atis
tics
, soc
ial d
ata,
dat
a on
nat
ural
con
diti
ons
in S
UL
UT.
2-
3(2)
To
coll
ect a
nd c
lari
fy b
asic
dat
a in
clud
ing
stat
isti
cs, s
ocia
l dat
a, d
ata
on n
atur
al c
ondi
tion
s in
NT
B
2-4(
1) T
o cr
eate
haz
ard
and
risk
map
s ba
sed
on th
e da
ta a
ccum
ulat
ed th
roug
h O
utpu
t 1 a
nd w
ell a
s ba
sic
data
col
lect
ed in
A
ctiv
ity
2-3
in S
UL
UT.
2-4(
2) T
o cr
eate
haz
ard
and
risk
map
s ba
sed
on b
asic
dat
a co
llec
ted
in A
ctiv
ity
2-3
in N
TB
.
2-
5(1)
To
plan
dis
aste
r m
itig
atio
n m
easu
res
base
d on
the
haza
rd a
nd r
isk
map
s cr
eate
d th
roug
h A
ctiv
ity
2-4
as w
ell a
s th
e le
sson
s le
arne
d fr
om th
e R
egio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan
(RD
MP
) de
velo
ped
thro
ugh
the
JIC
A S
tudy
in S
UL
UT.
2-5(
2) T
o pl
an d
isas
ter
mit
igat
ion
mea
sure
s ba
sed
on th
e ha
zard
and
ris
k m
aps
crea
ted
thro
ugh
Act
ivit
y 2-
4 as
wel
l as
the
less
ons
lear
ned
from
the
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n (R
DM
P)
deve
lope
d th
roug
h th
e JI
CA
Stu
dy in
NT
B.
3-1
To
form
ulat
e “T
echn
ical
gui
delin
e fo
r fo
rmul
atio
n of
reg
iona
l dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t pla
n fo
r re
genc
ies/
mun
icip
alit
ies”
.
3-
2 To
stu
dy a
bout
rev
isio
n of
SO
P us
ed c
omm
only
by
rege
ncy/
mun
icip
alit
y in
ord
er to
pre
pare
sta
ndar
d m
anua
l and
fo
rmul
ate
“Tec
hnic
al g
uide
line
for
form
ulat
ion
of S
OP
for
rege
ncie
s/m
unic
ipal
itie
s”.
3-3(
1) T
o co
llec
t and
cla
rify
bas
ic d
ata
incl
udin
g st
atis
tics
, soc
ial d
ata,
dat
a on
nat
ural
con
diti
ons
nece
ssar
y fo
r fo
rmul
atin
g R
DM
Ps
for
the
targ
et a
rea
in S
UL
UT.
3-3(
2) T
o co
llec
t and
cla
rify
bas
ic d
ata
incl
udin
g st
atis
tics
, soc
ial d
ata,
dat
a on
nat
ural
con
diti
ons
nece
ssar
y fo
r fo
rmul
atin
g R
DM
Ps
for
the
targ
et a
rea
in N
TB
.
3-4(
1) T
o fo
rmul
ate
RD
MPs
and
Reg
iona
l Act
ion
Pla
ns f
or D
isas
ter
Ris
k R
educ
tion
(D
RR
) fo
r th
e ta
rget
are
as in
SU
LU
T.
3-4(
2) T
o fo
rmul
ate
RD
MPs
and
Reg
iona
l Act
ion
Pla
ns f
or D
isas
ter
Ris
k R
educ
tion
(D
RR
) fo
r th
e ta
rget
are
as in
NT
B.
3-5
To f
orm
ulat
e or
rev
ise
SO
P in
the
1st ta
rget
are
a.
3-6
To r
evis
e th
e ex
isti
ng S
OP
acco
rdin
g to
em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
pla
n of
the
RD
MP
form
ulat
ed th
roug
h th
e A
ctiv
ity
3-4
in th
e 1st
targ
et a
rea.
3-7(
1) T
o pr
omot
e of
fici
al a
ppra
isal
by
rege
ncy/
mun
icip
alit
y of
RD
MP
form
ulat
ed th
roug
h A
ctiv
ity
3-4
in S
UL
UT.
3-7(
2) T
o pr
omot
e of
fici
al a
ppra
isal
by
rege
ncy/
mun
icip
alit
y of
RD
MP
form
ulat
ed th
roug
h A
ctiv
ity
3-4
in N
TB
.
4-
1 To
stu
dy e
xist
ing
docu
men
ts f
or im
plem
enta
tion
of d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent e
xerc
ises
.
4-
2 To
for
mul
ate
“Tec
hnic
al g
uide
line
for
impl
emen
ting
dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t exe
rcis
es f
or r
egen
cies
/mun
icip
aliti
es”
4-3
To im
plem
ent d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent e
xerc
ises
in th
e 1st
targ
et a
rea
toge
ther
wit
h na
tion
al le
vel o
rgan
izat
ions
.
4-
4 To
rev
ise
“Tec
hnic
al g
uide
line
for
impl
emen
ting
disa
ster
man
agem
ent e
xerc
ises
for
reg
enci
es/m
unic
ipal
itie
s” a
s w
ell a
s S
OP
s ba
sed
on th
e re
sult
of
the
disa
ster
man
agem
ent e
xerc
ise
if n
eces
sary
.
4-5(
1) T
o co
nduc
t act
ivit
ies
on C
BD
RM
to e
mpo
wer
dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t cap
acit
y ut
iliz
ing
outp
ut f
orm
ulat
ed th
roug
h th
e P
roje
ct in
SU
LU
T.
4-5(
2) T
o co
nduc
t act
ivit
ies
on C
BD
RM
to e
mpo
wer
dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t cap
acit
y ut
iliz
ing
outp
ut f
orm
ulat
ed th
roug
h th
e P
roje
ct in
NT
B.
5-1
To im
prov
e Te
chni
cal g
uide
line
for
for
mul
atio
n of
RD
MP
to b
e ut
iliz
ed a
s re
fere
nce
docu
men
t of
BN
PB
.
5-
2 To
par
tici
pate
eve
nts
host
ed b
y B
NPB
to e
xpla
in e
ffec
tive
util
izat
ion
of th
e Te
chni
cal G
uide
line
for
form
ulat
ion
of R
DM
P.
5-
3 To
giv
e in
put f
or f
orm
ulat
ion
of d
isas
ter
risk
ass
essm
ent t
echn
ical
gui
delin
e fo
r re
genc
ies/
mun
icip
alit
ies.
5-
4 To
pro
mot
e th
e m
etho
dolo
gy d
evel
oped
in O
utpu
t 2 A
ctiv
ity
2.2
espe
cial
ly o
n E
arth
quak
e H
azar
d.
Pro
ject
Man
agem
ent A
ctiv
ities
- R
/D (
on 1
1 Ju
ly 2
011)
and
JC
C (
18 J
an 2
012,
11
Jul 2
012,
)
Mid
-ter
m R
evie
w
Term
inal
Eva
luat
ion
A-4
Ap
pen
dix
3: S
ched
ule
of
the
Ter
min
al E
valu
atio
n
N
o D
ate
Lea
der
/ Sur
vey
Pla
nnin
g / C
BD
RM
/ D
RR
Pol
icy
Eva
luat
ion
& A
naly
sis
Indo
nesi
an E
valu
ator
1st
A
pr
5 S
un
15
:55
Arr
ival
at J
akar
ta (
NH
855
)
2nd
6 M
on
10
:00
Mee
ting
wit
h B
NP
B a
nd th
e jo
int e
valu
atio
n m
embe
r 15
:30
TV
Mee
ting
at J
ICA
Ind
ones
ia
10:0
0 M
eeti
ng w
ith
BN
PB
and
the
join
t eva
luat
ion
mem
ber
3rd
7
Tue
08:0
0 H
eari
ng w
ith
Min
istr
y of
Hom
e A
ffai
rs
15:0
0 M
ove
to th
e A
irpo
rt f
or M
anad
o (G
A60
6 1
8:30
-22:
50)
4th
8 W
ed
10
:00
Inte
rvie
w w
ith
BP
BD
Nor
th S
ulaw
esi P
rovi
nce
and
BP
BD
Kot
a M
anad
o 13
:40
Inte
rvie
w w
ith
BP
BD
Kot
a B
itun
g
5th
9 T
hu
10
:00
Inte
rvie
w w
ith
BP
BD
Tom
ohon
13
:00
Mov
e to
the
Air
port
for
Jak
arta
(G
A60
1 1
6:15
-18:
25)
6th
10
Fri
08:0
0 M
ove
to A
irpo
rt f
or L
ombo
k (G
A43
0 1
0:50
-13:
55)
15:3
0 D
iscu
ssio
n w
ith
JIC
A P
roje
ct T
eam
(al
l out
puts
)
7th
11
Sat
Rep
ort P
repa
rati
on
13:0
0 D
iscu
ssio
n w
ith
JIC
A P
roje
ct T
eam
8th
12
Sun
Rep
ort P
repa
rati
on
9th
13
M
on
09
:00
Inte
rvie
w w
ith
BP
BD
NT
B
10
th
14
Tue
06:3
0 M
ove
to B
PB
D W
est S
umba
wa
12
:00
Inte
rvie
w w
ith
BP
BD
Wes
t Sum
baw
a
11th
15
Wed
10:1
0 In
terv
iew
wit
h B
PB
D C
entr
al L
ombo
k
12
th
16
Thu
A
rriv
al a
t Lom
bok
via
Jaka
rta
NH
855
(10:
10 –
15:
55)
and
GA
432
(18:
10 –
21:
55)
09:3
0 P
arti
cipa
tion
to W
S f
or O
utpu
t 3 (
RD
MP
)
13th
17
Fri
10
:00
Vis
it to
BP
BD
Eas
t Lom
bok
for
foll
ow-u
p of
Out
put 2
A
rriv
al a
t Lom
bok
via
Jaka
rta
NH
855
(10:
10 –
15:
55)
and
GA
432
(18:
10 –
21:
55)
14th
18
Sat
09
:00
Par
tici
pati
on in
Eva
cuat
ion
Dri
ll f
or O
utpu
t 4 (
CB
DR
M)
15
th
19
Sun
09
:00
Sit
e vi
sit t
o N
orth
Lom
bok
Pre
para
tion
of
eval
uati
on r
epor
t
16th
20
Mon
09
:00
Cou
rtes
y C
all t
o B
PB
D N
TB
11
:15
Inte
rvie
w w
ith
Kot
a M
atar
am
13:0
0 M
ove
to a
irpo
rt f
or J
akar
ta (
GA
433
14:
40-1
5:40
)
17th
21
Tue
08
:30
Cou
rtes
y C
all t
o B
NP
B S
ecre
tary
Gen
eral
09
:15
Dis
cuss
ion
on E
valu
atio
n R
epor
t wit
h B
NP
B
09:1
5 D
iscu
ssio
n on
Eva
luat
ion
Rep
ort w
ith
BN
PB
18
th
22
Wed
10
:00
Dis
cuss
ion
wit
h Jo
int E
valu
atio
n M
embe
r 14
:00
Fin
aliz
atio
n of
the
Eva
luat
ion
Rep
ort
10:0
0 D
iscu
ssio
n w
ith
Join
t Eva
luat
ion
Mem
ber
14:0
0 F
inal
izat
ion
of th
e E
valu
atio
n R
epor
t 19
th
23
Thu
09
:00
5th J
CC
and
sig
ning
of
M/M
15
:30
Rep
ort t
o E
mba
ssy
of J
apan
09
:00
5th J
CC
and
sig
ning
of
M/M
20th
24
Fri
08
:30
Rep
ort t
o JI
CA
Ind
ones
ia
18:3
0 M
ove
to th
e A
irpo
rt (
NH
856
21:
35)
21th
25
Sat
07
:00
Arr
ival
at H
aned
a (0
7:00
)
A-5
Appendix 4: List of Interviewees
1 Indonesian Side
1) Counterpart Organizations
1 Mr. D. Wisnu Widjaja Deputy Chief for Prevention and Preparedness, BNPB 4/6,21 2 Mr. Lilik Kurniawan Director of Disaster Risk Reduction, BNPB 4/6,21 3 Ms. Anny Isgiati Director of Community Empowerment, BNPB 4/6,21 4 Mr. Medi Herliano Director of Preparedness, BNPB 4/6,21
5 Mr. Mohammad Masduki Director, Directorate of Prevention and Disaster Management, Directorate General of Public Government, MoHA
4/7
6 Mr. Hartono, SH Head of Sub Directorate Identification Disaster Potential, Directorate of Prevention and Disaster Management, Directorate General of Public Government, MoHA
4/7
7 Mr. Yoga Wiratama MoHA 4/7 8 Mr. Joko Sadono MoHA 4/7 9 Mr. Afif MoHA 4/7 10 Mr. Evan MoHA 4/7 11 Mr. Noldy W.D. Liow Head of BPBD North Sulawesi 4/8 12 Mr. Lahida Division Head for Rehabilitation & Reconstruction, BPBD North Sulawesi 4/8 13 Mr. Christian Laotongan Sub-Division Head for Emergency Response, BPBD North Sulawesi (GIS) 4/8 14 Mr. Jimmy Mokolensang Head of Division I (Prevention & Preparedness) , BPBD North Sulawesi 4/8 15 Mr. Tenny Tompodoung BPBD North Sulawesi 4/8 16 Mr. Jantya Lakoy BPBD North Sulawesi 4/8 17 Ms. Evie Palandeng Sub Division of community empowerment (GIS), BPBD North Sulawesi 4/8 18 Mr. Priyanka Permadi (GIS engineer on contract basis) 4/8 19 Ms. Jeane J. Bangonang BPBD Manado 4/8 20 Mr. Jeffry Wowiling Head of Environmental Agency, Bitung (Former Head of BPBD Bitung) 4/8 21 Mr. Alfindo Mongkol Head of Sub Division (Finance), BPBD Bitung 4/8 22 Mr. Herman L. Makalew Secretary of BPBD Bitung 4/8 23 Mr. J.R. Kalangi Head of BPBD Tomohon 4/9 24 Mr. Franny M. Tulung Head of Division (Emergency Response & Logistic), BPBD Tomohon 4/9 25 Mr. Willem Runtukahu Head of Division (Rehabilitation & Reconstruction) BPBD Tomohon 4/9 26 Mr.Wedha Magma Ardhi Head of BPBD West Nusa Tenggara 4/13,20 27 Mr. Tholib Abdullah Head of BPBD West Sumbawa 4/14 28 Mr. Lalu Nurpuri Head of BPBD Central Lombok 4/15 29 Mr. Sahabudin Secretary of BPBD Central Lombok 4/15 30 Mr. Lalu Zamzuri Head of Prevention & Preparedness, BPBD Central Lombok 4/15 31 Mr. I Gusti Ngurah Pariawan BPBD Mataram 4/20 32 Mr. Husni Imam Sanusi BPBD Mataram 4/20 33 Mr. Iqbal BPBD Mataram 4/20 34 Mr. Dody Ruswandi Secretary General, BNPB 4/21 35 Ms.Tri Utami H Risk Management Analyst – DRR BNPB 4/22 36 Ms.Lilis Siti Mutmainnah Non Structural Mitigation Analyst – DRR BNPB 4/22 37 Mr. Aminudin Hamzah Structural Mitigation Analyst – BNPB 4/22
2 Japanese Side
1) Project
1 Mr. Ichiro KOBAYASHI Chief Advisor 4/6-23 2 Ms. Ryoji TAKAHASHI Deputy Chief Advisor, Output 1, Output 3-1, 3-2, Output 4-1, Output 5 4/6-23 3 Mr. Tandiono Chen Local Consultant 4/6-23 4 Ms. Marisa Mei Ling Local Consultant 4/6-23 5 Ms. Miki KODAMA Output 4-2 4/10-23 6 Mr. Akihiro FURUTA Output 2 4/10-23 7 Mr. Kenji MORITA Output 2 4/10-23 8 Ms. Azusa MATSUI Capacity Development 4/10-18 9 Mr. Katsu KATO Output 3-1 4/10-23 10 Ms. Yoko OTA Project Coordination 4/10-23 11 Mr. Andre Jaya Local Consultant 4/10-20 12 Mr. Mujiburrahman Local Consultant 4//18-20
2) JICA Office
1) Mr. Hideki Katayama Advisor (Disaster Management and Water Resources), JICA Indonesia Office 4/6
A-6
Ap
pen
dix
5:
Dis
pat
ch o
f Ja
pan
ese
Exp
erts
A
s of
Apr
il 2
015
Nam
e D
urat
ion
in I
ndon
esia
(da
ys o
f st
ay)
Tot
al
Day
s 1st
FY
N
ov 2
011–
Mar
201
2
2nd F
Y
Apr
201
2 –
Mar
201
3 3rd
FY
A
pr 2
013
– M
ar 2
014
4th
FY
A
pr20
14 –
Mar
201
5 5th
FY
A
pr 2
015-
1 Ic
hiro
KO
BA
YA
SH
I C
hief
Adv
isor
/ C
ompr
ehen
sive
di
sast
er m
anag
emen
t
11/2
8-12
/21
(24)
5/28
-6/1
4 10
/8-1
0/25
(1
8)
(18)
4/15
-4/2
6 5/
13-6
/14
9/9-
9/12
(12)
(33) (5
)
6/15
-24
(10)
4/5-
4/25
(2
1)
141
2 R
yoji
TA
KA
HA
SH
I D
eput
y C
hief
Adv
isor
/ R
egio
nal
disa
ster
man
agem
ent p
lann
ing
11/2
4-12
/23
1/11
-1/3
1 (3
0)(2
1)3/
14-4
/12
6/19
-7/1
8 9/
24-1
0/18
11
/26-
12/2
0 20
13/1
/24-
2/22
(30)
(3
0)
(25)
(2
5)
(30)
5/13
-6/6
8/
25-9
/26
12/9
-12/
24
3/10
-4/1
2
(25)
(33)
(16)
(30)
6/11
-6/2
5 10
/9-1
1/7
1/7-
1/30
(15)
(30)
(24)
4/1-
4/30
(3
0)
394
3 N
obor
u IK
EN
ISH
I D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent I
nsti
tuti
on
and
Org
aniz
atio
n 11
/28-
12/2
3 (2
6)
4/16
-5/4
6/
18-7
/17
(19)
(3
0)
75
4 O
sam
u IS
OD
A
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Ins
titu
tion
an
d O
rgan
izat
ion
10
/22-
11/6
1/
29-2
/26
(16)
(2
9)
45
5 K
iyot
aka
OW
AD
A
Em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
pla
nnin
g
11/2
8-12
/23
2/2-
3/2
(26)
(30)
4/23
-5/2
6 7/
4-7/
18
10/1
-10/
30
1/6-
2/5
(34)
(1
5)
(30
) (3
1)
5/6-
5/25
8/
18-8
/30
3/26
-4/1
2
(20)
(12)
(18)
21
6
6 M
akot
o IK
ED
A
Dis
aste
r in
form
atio
n sy
stem
12
/1-1
2/23
3/
26 -
4/24
(2
3)(3
0)6/
27 -
7/18
10
/2 -
10/2
5 2/
3 -2
/28
(22)
(2
4)
(26)
8/21
-9/1
4 3/
23-4
/12
(25)
(21)
171
7 K
enic
hiro
KA
TO
D
isas
ter
mit
igat
ion
mea
sure
s (f
lood
, la
ndsl
ide,
dro
ught
, des
truc
tive
win
d,
fore
st f
ire)
11/2
8-12
/23
1/17
-2/1
5 (2
6)(3
0)4/
9-4/
27
6/27
-7/1
1 10
/8-1
1/6
(19)
(1
5)
(30)
12
0
8 Is
ao M
ISO
NO
D
isas
ter
mit
igat
ion
mea
sure
s (f
lood
, la
ndsl
ide,
dro
ught
, des
truc
tive
win
d,
fore
st f
ire)
2013
/1/2
4-2/
27
(35)
4/
15-5
/17
(33)
68
9 K
enji
MO
RIT
A
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t (fl
ood,
la
ndsl
ide,
dro
ught
, des
truc
tive
win
d,
fore
st f
ire)
12/1
6-12
/24
3/10
-4/5
(9
)(2
7)6/
11-6
/25
9/2-
10/2
1/
12-1
/28
(15)
(31)
(17)
4/7-
4/24
(1
7)
116
10
Sug
io I
MA
MU
RA
D
isas
ter
mit
igat
ion
mea
sure
s (e
arth
quak
e, ts
unam
i, vo
lcan
ic
erup
tion
)
12/6
-12/
23
2/20
-3/2
0 (1
8)(3
0)6/
3-7/
17
10/8
-11/
3 1/
13-2
/2
(45)
(2
7)
(21)
4/15
-5/3
0 3/
23-4
/12
(46)
(21)
6/15
-6/2
6 11
/12-
11/2
6 1/
11-1
/27
(12)
(15)
(17)
252
11
Aki
hiro
FU
RU
TA
D
atab
ase
/ GIS
1
12/6
-12/
23
3/26
-4/2
1 (1
8)(2
7)7/
3-7/
17
10/8
-11/
5 1/
13-2
/5
3/11
-3/2
4
(15)
(2
9)
(24)
(1
4)
5/6-
6/6
12/9
-12/
24
3/24
-4/1
9
(32)
(16)
(27)
6/11
-6/2
7 9/
2-10
/2
11/1
6-12
/10
1/12
-1/1
8
(17)
(31)
(25) (7
)
4/7-
4/24
(1
7)
299
12
Ang
elit
o A
rjon
a D
atab
ase
/ GIS
2
20
13/3
/18-
7/1
(tot
al60
)
60
13
Yuu
ichi
NA
KA
MU
RA
Dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t dri
ll (
1)
12/1
-12/
23
(23)
4/
9-5/
5 6/
10-7
/14
10/1
-10/
30
(27)
(3
5)
(30)
5/17
-6/1
5 8/
26-9
/29
(30)
(35)
4/8-
4/19
(12)
19
2
14
Kat
su K
AT
O
Dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t dri
ll (
2)
1/11
-2/9
3/
14-4
/12
(30)
(30)
6/19
-7/1
8 9/
19-1
0/18
(3
0)
(30)
5/
22-6
/1
8/28
-9/2
1 (1
1)(2
2)6/
16-6
/26
8/11
-8/2
2 (1
1)(1
2)
31
7
A-7
2/4-
3/2
(27)
12
/9-1
2/24
3/
19-4
/12
(16)
(25)
10/2
0-11
/7
1/7-
1/30
3/
30-4
/28
(19)
(24)
(30)
15
Mik
i KO
DA
MA
C
omm
unit
y-ba
sed
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Man
agem
ent
12/1
-12/
23
(23)
4/1-
4/15
5/
28-7
/11
9/30
-10/
28
(15)
(4
5)
(29)
4/7-
5/11
8/
26-9
/27
3/23
-4/1
2
(35)
(33)
(21)
6/14
-6/2
6 10
/13-
11/1
5
(10)
(35)
4/5-
5/4
(30)
27
6
16
Azu
sa M
AT
SU
I C
apac
ity
Dev
elop
men
t 11
/28-
12/2
3 (2
6)
10/1
5-11
/6
(23)
6/
16-6
/27
(12)
4/7-
4/18
(1
2)
73
17
Azu
sa O
KU
NO
C
oord
inat
or/S
uppo
rt o
f th
e E
xper
t in
CB
DR
M
11/2
4-12
/23
(30)
4/
2-5/
16
(45)
75
18
Yok
o O
TA
C
oord
inat
or/S
uppo
rt o
f th
e E
xper
t in
CB
DR
M
6/26
-7/1
8 9/
19-1
1/6
2/6-
3/2
(23)
(4
9)
(25)
5/13
-6/6
8/
25-9
/25
3/20
-4/1
2
(25)
(32)
(24)
6/12
-6/2
7 1/
13-1
/30
(16)
(12)
3/30
-4/2
8 (3
0)
236
Tot
al
31
26
Loc
al c
ontr
act w
ith
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Res
pons
ibil
ity
in th
e P
roje
ct
Dur
atio
n
1 M
r. A
ndre
Jay
a L
ocal
Con
sult
ant (
Out
put 1
) Ja
n.20
12-
2 M
s. M
aris
a M
ei L
ing
Loc
al C
onsu
ltan
t (O
utpu
t 2 b
efor
e)
Jan.
2012
-
3 M
r. Ta
ndio
no C
hen
Loc
al C
onsu
ltan
t (O
utpu
t 3)
Dec
.201
1-
4 M
r. M
ujib
urra
hman
L
ocal
Con
sult
ant (
Out
put 4
) A
pr.2
012-
5 M
r. B
enha
rd A
ldri
n E
mor
P
roje
ct A
ssis
tant
M
ay.2
012-
Mar
201
4
6 M
s. L
ydia
Ret
or
Sec
reta
ry
Oct
.201
2- M
ar.2
014
7 M
r. F
rank
y R
. Naj
oan
Tra
nsla
tor/
Inte
rpre
ter
May
201
3-
8 M
s. A
rlis
tha
Ban
tika
T
rans
lato
r/In
terp
rete
r
Sep
.201
2- M
ar. 2
014
9 M
s. S
arti
ny T
e’da
ng
Tra
nsla
tor
Mar
.201
3- M
ar.2
014
10
Mr.
Yoh
akim
B S
ampo
nu
GIS
Ope
rato
r N
ov.2
012-
11
Mr.
Rac
hmat
S. D
iem
yati
G
IS O
pera
tor
Feb
.201
3-M
ar.2
014
12
Mr.
Rol
ly
Dri
ver
Sep
.201
2- M
ar 2
014
13
Mr.
Alf
ons
Dri
ver
May
2013
- M
ar 2
014
14
Ms.
Wen
ny T
rish
anty
S
ecre
tary
Ja
n.20
12-O
ct.2
012
15
Ms.
Nov
iyan
ti E
rfie
n K
apar
ang
Loc
al C
onsu
ltan
t (O
utpu
t 3)
Jue.
2014
– N
ov.2
014
16
Ms.
Fin
a F
itri
any
S
ecre
tary
A
pr.2
014-
Dec
.201
4
17
Mr.
Oyo
ng S
afru
ly
Sec
reta
ry
Apr
.201
4-
18
Ms.
Viv
in N
ila
Rak
hmat
ulla
h
Tra
nsla
tor/
Inte
rpre
ter
Jun.
201
4-
A-8
Ap
pen
dix
6:
Pro
visi
on o
f E
qu
ipm
ent
As
of A
pril
201
5 1)
Pro
visi
on o
f E
quip
men
t N
o E
quip
men
t S
peci
fica
tion
and
Man
ufac
ture
r Q
uant
ity
Tot
al P
rice
D
eliv
ery
Dat
e P
lace
of
Use
C
urre
nt S
tatu
s
1 P
rint
er
Can
on L
BP
910
0 C
1
IDR
20,
500,
000
2011
/12/
14
BN
PB
H
ande
d O
ver
on 2
8 M
ar 2
014
2 C
ompu
ter
for
Haz
ard
Map
D
ell 2
320
2 ID
R 3
3,00
0,00
0 20
11/1
2/14
B
NP
B
Han
ded
Ove
r on
28
Mar
201
4
3 G
IS S
oftw
are
A
rcV
iew
10.1
1
US
D 5
,090
20
12/3
/26
BN
PB
, BP
BD
H
ande
d O
ver
on 2
8 M
ar 2
014
4 C
ompu
ter
for
Haz
ard
Map
H
P O
MN
I 22
0-10
10D
AIO
PC
2
IDR
13,
546,
000
IDR
13,
140,
000
2012
/10/
1 20
12/1
2/6
BP
BD
Nor
th S
ulaw
esi
Han
ded
Ove
r on
28
Mar
201
4
5 P
rint
er
Can
on L
BP
910
0 C
1
IDR
21,
654,
000
20
12/1
0/2
BP
BD
Nor
th S
ulaw
esi
Han
ded
Ove
r on
28
Mar
201
4
6 S
atel
lite
Im
age
A
LO
S(A
VN
IR2)
1
JPY
63,
000
2012
/10/
16
BP
BD
Nor
th S
ulaw
esi
Han
ded
Ove
r on
28
Mar
201
4
7 E
leva
tion
Dat
a
IFS
AR
1
US
D 2
3,91
8.4
2012
/10/
29
BP
BD
Nor
th S
ulaw
esi
Han
ded
Ove
r on
28
Mar
201
4
8 G
IS S
oftw
are
A
rcV
iew
10.1
, Spa
tial
Ana
lyst
2
US
D 9
676.
6 20
12/1
2/3
BP
BD
Nor
th S
ulaw
esi
Han
ded
Ove
r on
28
Mar
201
4
9 S
atel
lite
Im
age
A
LO
S(A
VN
IR2)
1
JPY
825
,750
20
13/1
/7
BP
BD
Nor
th S
ulaw
esi
Han
ded
Ove
r on
28
Mar
201
4
10
Plo
tter
H
P D
esig
n Je
t 790
A4
in P
ostS
crip
t e p
rint
er (
A0
+ )
1
IDR
52,
650,
000
2013
/4/3
0 B
PB
D N
orth
Sul
awes
i H
ande
d O
ver
on 2
8 M
ar 2
014
11
Com
pute
r fo
r H
azar
d M
ap
AS
US
Eee
Top
443
0s A
LL
IN
ON
E
2 ID
R 3
3,02
8,00
0 20
14/6
/10
BP
BD
Wes
t Nus
a T
engg
ara
In u
se
12
Pri
nter
H
P L
AS
ER
JET
CP
522
5 1
IDR
22,0
00,0
00
2014
/5/1
4 B
PB
D W
est N
usa
Ten
ggar
a In
use
13
Ele
vati
on D
ata
IF
SA
R
1 U
SD
729
7.3
2014
/8/1
1 B
PB
D W
est N
usa
Ten
ggar
a In
use
14
Ele
vati
on D
ata
IF
SA
R
1 U
SD
12,
574.
4 20
14/8
/11
BP
BD
Wes
t Nus
a T
engg
ara
In u
se
15
Ele
vati
on D
ata
IF
SA
R
1 U
SD
7,9
56.4
20
14/8
/18
BP
BD
Wes
t Nus
a T
engg
ara
In u
se
16
Plo
tter
H
P D
esig
n Je
t 790
A4
in P
ostS
crip
t e p
rint
er (
A0
+ )
1
IDR
49,0
00,0
00
2014
/4/2
2 B
PB
D W
est N
usa
Ten
ggar
a In
use
2) E
quip
men
t Acc
ompa
nied
by
Exp
ert D
ispa
tch
No
Equ
ipm
ent
Spe
cifi
cati
on a
nd M
anuf
actu
rer
Qua
ntit
yT
otal
Pri
ce
Del
iver
y D
ate
Pla
ce o
f U
se
Com
men
t
N
one
A-9
Ap
pen
dix
7: C
oun
terp
art
Tra
inin
g A
s of
Apr
il 2
015
Per
iod
Nam
e O
rgan
izat
ion
Vis
ited
Ins
titu
tion
s an
d C
ours
e
25 A
ug –
8
Sep
2
012
1 D
r. Te
ddy
Sud
inda
B
NP
B
1.M
inis
try
of L
and,
Inf
rast
ruct
ure,
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
and
Tour
ism
Toh
oku
Reg
iona
l Dev
elop
men
t Bur
eau,
S
enda
i Riv
er a
nd N
atio
nal H
ighw
ay
Off
ice
2.S
hich
igah
ama
Tow
n,
3.Is
hino
mak
i Cit
y,
4. O
naga
wa
Tow
n 5.
Jap
an M
eteo
rogi
cal A
genc
y 6.
Tok
yo R
inka
i Dis
aste
r P
reve
ntio
n P
ark
7. M
egur
o W
ard
8.
Yok
oham
a C
ity
9. S
umid
a W
ard
Gov
ernm
ent
10. C
omm
unit
y-ba
sed
Dis
aste
r P
reve
ntio
n G
roup
in S
umid
a W
ard
11.K
ochi
Pre
fect
ure
Gov
ernm
ent
12. K
ochi
Mun
icip
alit
y G
over
nmen
t
2 M
r.Ana
s L
uthf
i B
NP
B
3 M
r.Hoy
ke M
akar
awun
g H
ead,
BP
BD
Pro
vinc
e of
Nor
th S
ulaw
esi
4 M
r. Ji
mm
y E
. Mok
olen
sang
B
PB
D P
rovi
nce
of N
orth
Sul
awes
i
5 M
r. F
idel
wan
Buu
lolo
B
PB
D K
ota
Man
ado
6 M
r. Je
ffry
Wow
ilin
g H
ead,
BP
BD
Kot
a B
itun
g
7 M
r. W
ille
n P
olii
Run
tuka
hu
BP
BD
Kot
a To
moh
on
8 M
s. E
nna
Mok
ogin
ta
Hea
d, B
PB
D K
ota
Kot
amob
agu
9 M
r. D
juha
rdi D
amop
olii
Hea
d, B
PB
D K
abup
aten
Bol
aang
Mon
gond
ow
10
Mr.
H. E
riks
on T
egil
a H
ead,
BPB
D K
abup
aten
Bol
aang
Mon
gond
ow U
tara
11
Mr.
Mas
pan
Mus
Puw
a H
ead,
BP
BD
Kab
upat
en B
olaa
ng M
ongo
ndow
Sel
atan
12
Mr.
Har
iono
Sug
eha
Hea
d, B
PB
D K
abup
aten
Bol
aang
Mon
gond
ow T
imur
13
Mr.
Vec
ky K
aloh
H
ead,
BP
BD
Kab
upat
en M
inah
asa
14
Ms.
Lil
ly L
engk
ong
Hea
d, B
PB
D K
abup
aten
Min
ahas
a U
tara
15
Mr.
Han
drie
M.J
. Kom
alin
g H
ead,
BP
BD
Kab
upat
en M
inah
asa
Sel
atan
16
Mr.
Wel
ly M
unai
sech
e H
ead,
BP
BD
Kab
upat
en M
inah
asa
Teng
gara
17
Mr.
E. P
osum
ah
Hea
d, B
PB
D K
abup
aten
Kep
ulau
an S
itar
o
18
Mr.
Rei
ntje
Tam
boto
H
ead,
BPB
D K
abup
aten
Kep
ulau
an S
angi
he
19
Mr.
H. S
alom
be
Hea
d, B
PB
D K
abup
aten
Kep
ulau
an T
alau
d
16 A
ug -
3
0 A
ug
201
4
1 M
r. W
edha
Mag
ma
Ard
hi
Hea
d of
BP
BD
- N
TB
Pro
vinc
e 1.
Sak
uraj
ima
Vol
cano
Res
earc
h C
ente
r 2.
Sak
uraj
ima
Vis
itor
Cen
ter
(Vol
cano
Mus
eum
) 3.
Kag
oshi
ma
Pre
fect
ure
Gov
ernm
ent(
Vis
it to
Sab
o D
ept./
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Dep
t.)
4. K
agos
him
a M
unic
ipal
ity
Gov
ernm
ent (
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Mea
sure
s in
Mun
icip
al G
over
nmen
t)
5.C
omm
unit
y -b
ased
dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t gro
up in
Sak
ura
jim
a ar
ea
6. M
LIT
Kyu
shu
Reg
iona
l Dev
elop
men
t Bur
eau
of O
sum
i R
iver
and
N
atio
nal H
ighw
ay O
ffic
e 7.
Tok
yo R
inka
i Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Par
k 8.
Tok
yo M
etro
poli
tan
Gov
ernm
ent (
Em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
sys
tem
and
di
sast
er m
anag
emen
t bas
e)
9. L
ectu
re o
f To
hoku
Uni
vers
ity
“ R
ole
of r
esea
rch
inst
itut
e fo
r re
cons
truc
tion
fro
m G
reat
Eas
tern
Jap
an E
arth
quak
e”
10. L
ife
Saf
ety
Lea
rnin
g C
ente
r 11
. Jap
an M
eteo
rolo
gica
l Age
ncy
12. M
inis
try
of L
and,
Inf
rast
ruct
ure,
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
and
Tour
ism
13
. Hig
ashi
mat
sush
ima
Cit
y M
unic
ipal
ity
14
. Exc
hang
e of
the
prog
ress
of
reco
nstr
ucti
on w
ith
Ace
h C
ity
in
Hig
ashi
mat
sush
ima
15. N
obir
u R
eloc
ated
Dev
elop
ed L
and,
Rel
ocat
ed h
ousi
ng c
ompl
ex,
Meg
a S
olar
Par
k, D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent S
tock
pile
16
. Ish
inom
aki C
ity
for
stor
y te
llin
g of
Gre
at E
ast J
apan
Ear
thqu
ake
17. I
shin
omak
i NE
WS
ee
18. P
arti
cipa
tory
rec
onst
ruct
ion
plan
ning
in I
shin
omak
i Cit
y 19
. Obs
erva
tion
of
Em
erge
ncy
dril
l (G
inza
)
2 M
r. H
ardy
Wij
aya
Hea
d of
Pre
vent
ion
and
Pre
pare
dnes
s D
ivis
ion
– B
PB
D N
TB
Pro
vinc
e
3 M
r. A
hyar
Jun
aidi
Abd
ul A
zis
Hea
d of
Reh
abil
itat
ion
and
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
Div
isio
n -
BP
BD
NT
B P
rovi
nce
4 M
r. S
upar
di
Hea
d of
BP
BD
- K
ota
Mat
aram
5 M
r. H
alaw
i Mus
tafa
Kho
lidi
H
ead
of B
PB
D -
Kab
. Lom
bok
Bar
at
6 N
urpu
ri S
inar
ep R
uman
gin
Hea
d of
BP
BD
- K
ab. L
ombo
k Te
ngah
7 M
r. A
bdul
Hak
im
Hea
d of
BP
BD
- K
ab. L
ombo
k T
imur
8 M
r. M
oh. I
wan
Mar
et A
smar
a H
ead
of B
PB
D -
Kab
. Lom
bok
Uta
ra
9 M
r. T
holi
b A
bdul
lah
Hea
d of
BP
BD
- K
ab. S
umba
wa
Bar
at
10
Mr.
Muk
min
H
ead
of B
PB
D -
Kab
. Sum
baw
a
11
Mr.
Imra
n H
ead
of B
PB
D -
Kab
. Dom
pu
12
Mr.
Muh
amm
ad F
akhr
unra
ji B
in H
amid
H
ead
of B
PB
D -
Kot
a B
ima
13
Mr.
Abd
ul W
ahab
H
ead
of B
PB
D -
Kab
. Bim
a
14
Mr.
Nol
dy W
olte
r D
avid
Lio
w
Hea
d of
BP
BD
Nor
th S
ulaw
esi P
rovi
nce
15
Mr.
Jeff
ry W
owil
ing
Hea
d of
BP
BD
Kot
a B
itun
g
16
Ms.
Eli
n L
inaw
aty
BN
PB
17
Mr.
Yul
iant
o S
ukat
mo
Wiy
ono
BN
PB
18
Mr.
Pra
tom
o C
ahyo
Nug
roho
B
NP
B
19
Ms.
Git
a Y
ulia
nti S
uwan
di
BN
PB
20
Ms.
Dia
n A
ndry
Pus
pita
Sar
i B
NP
B
A-10
Ap
pen
dix
8: A
ssig
nm
ent
of C
oun
terp
art
Per
son
nel
A
s of
Apr
il 2
015
1) C
/P f
rom
BN
PB
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BN
PB
P
erio
d 1
Pro
ject
Dir
ecto
r M
r. B
erna
rdus
Wis
nu W
ijay
a D
eput
y C
hief
for
Pre
vent
ion
and
Pre
pare
dnes
s
Oct
201
4 -
2 M
r. D
ody
Rus
wan
di
Dep
uty
Chi
ef f
or P
reve
ntio
n an
d P
repa
redn
ess
A
ug 2
013
– O
ct 2
014
3 M
r. S
ugen
g T
riut
omo
Dep
uty
Chi
ef f
or P
reve
ntio
n an
d P
repa
redn
ess
-
Aug
201
3
4 P
roje
ct M
anag
er 1
for
Out
put 2
and
3-1
M
r. L
ilik
Kur
niaw
an, S
.T.,
M.S
i. D
irec
tor
for
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Red
ucti
on
M
ar 2
013
-
5 Te
ddy
W. S
udin
da
Dir
ecto
r fo
r D
isas
ter
Ris
k R
educ
tion
- M
ar 2
013
6 P
roje
ct M
anag
er 2
for
Out
put 3
-2 a
nd 4
-1
Mr.
Med
i Her
liya
nto,
CE
S,M
M
Dir
ecto
r fo
r P
repa
redn
ess
7
Pro
ject
Man
ager
3 f
or O
utpu
t 1 a
nd 2
D
r. S
utop
o P
urw
o N
ugro
ho
Hea
d of
Dat
a, I
nfor
mat
ion
and
Pub
lic
Rel
atio
n C
ente
r
8 P
roje
ct M
anag
er 4
for
Out
put 4
-2
Ms.
Ann
y Is
giat
i D
irec
tor
for
Com
mun
ity
Em
pow
erm
ent
O
ct 2
013
- 9
Drs
. Muh
taru
ddin
, M.S
i. D
irec
tor
for
Com
mun
ity
Em
pow
erm
ent
-
Oct
201
3 10
P
roje
ct C
oord
inat
or
Mr.
R. S
ugih
arto
D
irec
tor
for
Bur
eau
of L
aws
and
Coo
pera
tion
11
Out
put 1
D
isas
ter
Dat
a an
d In
form
atio
n Te
am L
eade
r fo
r O
utpu
t 1
Neu
lis
Zul
iast
ri
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: I
nfor
mat
ion
12
Mem
ber
1-1
Lin
da L
esta
ri
Staf
f
13
M
embe
r 1-
2 D
r. A
gus
Wib
owo
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: D
ata
14
O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Team
Lea
der
for
Out
put 2
L
ilik
Kur
niaw
an, S
.T.,
M.S
i. D
irec
tor
for
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Red
ucti
on
15
M
embe
r 2-
1 A
rie
Ast
uti W
ulan
dari
, S.S
i. St
aff
of D
irec
tora
te f
or D
RR
16
Mem
ber
2-2
Pra
tom
o C
ahyo
Nug
roho
, S.T
. St
aff
of D
irec
tora
te f
or D
RR
17
Out
put 3
R
egio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent
Pla
n, a
nd A
ctio
n P
lan
t D
eput
y Te
am L
eade
r 1
Eli
n L
inaw
ati,
S.K
.M, M
.M.
Hea
d of
Sub
Div
isio
n: M
itig
atio
n
Jun
e 20
12 -
18
Ir
. Ana
s L
uthf
i, M
.T.
Hea
d of
Sub
Div
isio
n: M
itig
atio
n
- Ju
ne 2
012
19
Mem
ber
3-1-
1 M
ohd.
Rob
i Am
ri, S
.T.
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Dis
aste
r R
isk
Ass
essm
ent
20
M
embe
r 3-
1-2
Nov
i Kum
alas
ari,
S.A
.P
Staf
f of
Dir
ecto
rate
for
DR
R
21
C
onti
ngen
cy P
lan
and
SO
P
Dep
uty
Team
Lea
der
2 Ir
. Afr
ial R
osya
, M.A
. H
ead
of S
ub D
irec
tora
te: R
espo
nse
Pla
nnin
g
22
Mem
ber
3-2-
1 dr
. Ruc
ky N
urul
Wur
sant
y D
ewi
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Nee
ds &
Pot
enti
al R
esou
rces
23
Mem
ber
3-2-
2 F
ery
Iraw
an, S
.Kom
St
aff
of D
irec
tora
te f
or P
repa
redn
ess
24
M
embe
r 3-
2-3
Yus
Riz
al
Hea
d of
Sub
Dir
ecto
rate
: Res
cue
& E
vacu
atio
n
25
Out
put 4
D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent D
rill
and
E
xerc
ise
Team
Lea
der
for
Out
put 4
-1
Edy
Pur
ba
Hea
d of
Sub
Dir
ecto
rate
: Pre
para
tion
of
Res
ourc
es
Jun
e 20
12 -
26
E
lin
Lin
awat
i, S
.K.M
, M.M
. H
ead
of S
ub D
irec
tora
te: P
repa
rati
on o
f R
esou
rces
-
Jun
e 20
12
27
Mem
ber
4-1-
1 H
arap
an A
li B
erna
dus
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Con
trol
ling
28
Mem
ber
4-1-
2 M
eili
na W
ulan
dari
, S.S
os
Staf
f of
Dir
ecto
rate
for
Pre
pare
dnes
s
29
Com
mun
ity-
base
d D
isas
ter
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t Te
am L
eade
r fo
r O
utpu
t 4-2
D
ra. E
nny
Sup
arti
ni, M
.M.
Hea
d of
Sub
Dir
ecto
rate
: Com
mun
ity’
s R
ole
30
M
embe
r 4-
2-1
Mel
issa
Apr
ilia
, S.K
.M.
Staf
f of
Dir
ecto
rate
for
Com
mun
ity
Em
pow
erm
ent
31
M
embe
r 4-
2-2
Yoh
anne
s K
rist
anto
Adi
nugr
oho
Staf
f of
Dir
ecto
rate
for
Com
mun
ity
Em
pow
erm
ent
2) C
/P f
rom
Nor
th S
ulaw
esi P
rovi
nce
BP
BD
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
P
erio
d 1
Pro
vinc
e Te
am D
irec
tor
Ir. N
oldy
W.D
. Lio
w
Hea
d of
BP
BD
N
ov 2
013
-
2 Ir
. Hoy
ke M
akar
awun
g H
ead
of B
PB
D
- N
ov 2
013
3 C
oord
inat
or
Jim
my
Mok
olen
sang
H
ead
of D
ivis
ion
for
Pre
vent
ion
& P
repa
redn
ess
4
Out
put 1
D
isas
ter
Dat
a an
d In
form
atio
n S
ub C
oord
inat
or
John
Kap
ele
E. W
ungo
w
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n fo
r E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
5
Mem
ber
1 Jo
nath
an P
ande
giro
th
Staf
f of
Div
isio
n fo
r E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
6
Mem
ber
2 D
erry
Uns
o St
aff
of P
reve
ntio
n an
d P
repa
redn
ess
Sub
-Div
isio
n
7 M
embe
r 3
Indr
i St
aff
8 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Sub
Coo
rdin
ator
M
. S. L
ahid
a H
ead
of D
ivis
ion
for
Reh
abil
itat
ion
& R
econ
stru
ctio
n
9 M
embe
r 1
Yok
tan
Sud
amar
a St
aff
of R
ehab
-Rec
on S
ub-D
ivis
ion
10
M
embe
r 2
Stev
en P
osum
ah
Staf
f of
Pre
-Dis
aste
r S
ub-D
ivis
ion
11
M
embe
r 3
Yon
gki
Staf
f
12
O
utpu
t 3
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t S
ub C
oord
inat
or
Ron
ny C
.R.M
. Sam
buag
a S
ecre
tary
of
BP
BD
A-11
13
Pla
n, a
nd A
ctio
n P
lan
t M
embe
r 1
Mus
Tin
ango
n H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: P
reve
ntio
n
14
Mem
ber
2 A
rlen
e R
umon
dor
Mem
ber
of Q
uick
Res
pons
e Te
am
15
M
embe
r 3
Judd
y F.
Tom
buku
St
aff
of S
ub D
iv: E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
16
C
onti
ngen
cy P
lan
and
SO
P
Sub
Coo
rdin
ator
A
lber
t CH
. Som
bah
Hea
d of
UP
TB
(R
egio
n I)
17
Mem
ber
1 F
rank
y L
aham
endu
St
aff
18
M
embe
r 2
Jim
my
Mok
olen
sang
H
ead
of D
ivis
ion
I (P
reve
ntio
n &
Pre
pare
dnes
s)
19
M
embe
r 3
Jefr
i Mat
inda
s St
aff
20
O
utpu
t 4
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Dri
ll a
nd
Exe
rcis
e S
ub C
oord
inat
or
The
resi
a S
unda
h H
ead
of U
PT
B (
Reg
ion
II)
21
M
embe
r 1
Chr
isti
an L
aoto
ngan
H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
22
M
embe
r 2
Jefr
y P
ande
irot
h St
aff
23
M
embe
r 3
Roy
Sen
dow
St
aff
24
C
omm
unit
y-ba
sed
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Man
agem
ent
Sub
Coo
rdin
ator
V
icky
Mon
gila
la
Hea
d of
UP
TB
(R
egio
n II
I)
25
M
embe
r 1
Sel
vi L
ombo
an
Hea
d of
Sub
Div
: Com
mun
ity
Em
pow
erm
ent
26
Mem
ber
2 E
vie
Pal
ande
ng
Staf
f of
Sub
Div
: Com
mun
ity
Em
pow
erm
ent
27
Mem
ber
3 Jo
klin
Kum
okon
g St
aff
of S
ub D
iv: C
omm
unit
y E
mpo
wer
men
t
28
M
embe
r 4
John
Mak
araw
ung
Staf
f
3) C
/Ps
from
Kab
upat
en a
nd K
ota
BPB
D in
Nor
th S
ulaw
esi P
rovi
nce
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
P
erio
d 1
Kot
a M
anad
o
Team
Dir
ecto
r M
axim
ilia
n Ta
tahe
de
Hea
d of
BP
BD
A
ugus
t 201
2 -
2
Boy
Nar
ay
Hea
d of
BP
BD
-A
ugus
t 201
2
Coo
rdin
ator
-
-
3 O
utpu
t 1
Dis
aste
r D
ata
and
Info
rmat
ion
Mem
ber
1 Je
ane
J. B
ango
nang
, SE
H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e &
Log
isti
c
4 M
embe
r 2
Geo
rgie
Pes
ulim
a, S
T
Adm
inis
trat
ion
of E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
acti
viti
es (
JFU
)
5 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 Jo
han
The
o S
upit
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: R
ehab
ilit
atio
n &
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
6
Mem
ber
2 Ju
lien
Baw
ole,
A.M
d R
econ
stru
ctio
n D
evel
opm
ent P
lann
ing
(JF
U)
7
Out
put 3
R
egio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan,
an
d A
ctio
n P
lan
M
embe
r 1
Jeff
ri A
. Pan
ambu
nan,
MA
H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Pre
vent
ion
& P
repa
redn
ess
8
Mem
ber
2 B
udhi
Rai
duan
Yas
in, S
T
Ana
lyzi
ng th
e P
ost D
isas
ter
Rel
ief
(JF
U)
9
Con
ting
ency
Pla
n an
d S
OP
M
embe
r 3
Mua
rdi R
ahm
ola,
S.S
os
Sec
reta
ry o
f B
PB
D
10
M
embe
r 4
Fen
ce D
. Sal
inde
ho, S
E
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Rec
onst
ruct
ion
11
O
utpu
t 4
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Dri
ll a
nd
Exe
rcis
e M
embe
r 1
Fer
dy L
adja
, SH
H
ead
of S
ecti
on: P
reve
ntio
n
12
Mem
ber
2 A
rda
Toha
Pra
yiya
di, S
H
Pre
para
tion
of
Pre
pare
dnes
s G
oods
(JF
U)
13
C
omm
unit
y-ba
sed
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Man
agem
ent
Mem
ber
3 F
idel
wan
Buu
lolo
, ST
h H
ead
of S
ecti
on: P
repa
redn
ess
14
M
embe
r 4
Ang
elin
a Ju
ly B
ajod
o, A
.M
Adm
inis
trat
ion
of R
econ
stru
ctio
n ac
tivi
ties
(JF
U)
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
P
erio
d 1
Kot
a To
moh
on
Team
Dir
ecto
r J.
R. K
alan
gi
Hea
d of
BP
BD
D
ec 2
013
- 2
Drs
. Edd
y T
uran
g, M
M
Hea
d of
BP
BD
D
ec 2
012
- D
ec 2
013
3 R
oyke
Roe
roe
Hea
d of
BP
BD
-
Dec
201
2 4
Coo
rdin
ator
K
orne
les
Mon
tola
lu, M
Pd
Sec
reta
ry o
f B
PB
D
5
Out
put 1
D
isas
ter
Dat
a an
d In
form
atio
n M
embe
r 1
Met
si C
h. T
angk
uman
, ST
S
ub D
iv: A
dmin
istr
atio
n,
UP
T P
usda
tin
(Dat
a &
Inf
orm
atio
n C
ente
r)
6 M
embe
r 2
Nic
son
A. Y
. Paa
t St
aff
7
Out
put 2
H
azar
d an
d R
isk
Map
s M
embe
r 1
Hen
gky
W. L
enzu
n H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: P
reve
ntio
n
8
Mem
ber
2 N
erov
ian
Tur
ang
Staf
f
9 O
utpu
t 3
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n,
and
Act
ion
Pla
n t
Mem
ber
1 F
rann
y M
. Tul
ung,
Spi
, MT
H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e &
Log
isti
c
10
Mem
ber
2 Je
ffry
Ram
bing
, SH
St
aff
11
M
embe
r 3
Fan
do M
auka
r, A
md.
T
Staf
f
12
Con
ting
ency
Pla
n an
d S
OP
M
embe
r 4
Yob
ert T
uran
g H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: L
ogis
tic
13
M
embe
r 5
Dar
ius
Sen
duk,
SE
H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
A-12
14
Mem
ber
6 V
eny
Piy
oh, S
E
Hea
d of
Sub
Div
: Pre
pare
dnes
s
15
Mem
ber
7 C
itra
Afa
ndi
Staf
f
16
Out
put 4
D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent D
rill
and
E
xerc
ise
Mem
ber
1 W
ille
m R
untu
kahu
H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Reh
abil
itat
ion
& R
econ
stru
ctio
n
17
Mem
ber
2 A
gus
Rum
ense
r, S
.Sos
H
ead
of U
nit:
Fir
e F
ight
er
18
M
embe
r 3
Ron
ald
Gon
i, S
H
Sub
Div
: Adm
inis
trat
ion;
UP
T P
usda
lops
19
Mem
ber
4 R
icha
rd P
anga
lila
St
aff
20
C
omm
unit
y-ba
sed
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Man
agem
ent
Mem
ber
5 Ji
ma
Kap
aran
g, S
T
Hea
d of
Sub
Div
: Rec
onst
ruct
ion
21
M
embe
r 6
Stel
la L
angi
tan,
S. K
omp
Hea
d of
Sub
Div
: Reh
abil
itat
ion
22
M
embe
r 7
Imci
lia
Pel
ealu
St
aff
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
P
erio
d 1
Kot
a B
itun
g
Team
Dir
ecto
r A
dri S
upit
H
ead
of B
PB
D
Sep
t 201
4 -
2 Je
ffry
Wow
ilin
g H
ead
of B
PB
D
2012
- S
ept 2
014
C
oord
inat
or
- -
3
Out
put 1
D
isas
ter
Dat
a an
d In
form
atio
n M
embe
r 1
Mel
any
Per
mat
a, S
E, A
k St
aff
4
Mem
ber
2 S
udis
man
Ont
honi
, SE
H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: R
ehab
ilit
atio
n &
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
5
Out
put 2
H
azar
d an
d R
isk
Map
s M
embe
r 1
Ingr
id M
. Dam
isi
Staf
f
6 M
embe
r 2
theo
doru
s M
. R
ompa
s, S
T,
ME
H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Reh
abil
itat
ion
& R
econ
stru
ctio
n
7 O
utpu
t 3
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n,
and
Act
ion
Pla
n
Mem
ber
1 A
lfin
do M
ongk
ol, S
E, A
k H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: F
inan
ce
8
Mem
ber
2 D
rs. D
jonn
y S
alan
gka
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: E
mer
genc
y &
Log
isti
c
9
Con
ting
ency
Pla
n an
d S
OP
M
embe
r 3
Pan
dji S
isw
ojo,
SE
St
aff
10
M
embe
r 4
Wil
son
Sah
ala,
S.S
os
Staf
f
11
Out
put 4
D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent D
rill
and
E
xerc
ise
Mem
ber
1 R
obby
Tim
bule
ng
Hea
d of
Sub
Div
: Pre
vent
ion
12
M
embe
r 2
Muh
amm
ad D
jauh
ari,
SE
H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: P
repa
redn
ess
13
C
omm
unit
y-ba
sed
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Man
agem
ent
Mem
ber
3 P
atri
es H
. K
alan
gkah
an,
SE
, A
k H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: L
ogis
tic
14
Mem
ber
4 D
rs.
Joik
e F.
D.
Ran
sale
le,
M.A
P
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: P
reve
ntio
n &
Pre
pare
dnes
s
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
P
erio
d 1
Kot
a K
otam
obag
u
Team
Dir
ecto
r Im
ran
Am
on
Hea
d of
BP
BD
M
ar 2
015
- 2
M. S
aleh
Zul
hadj
i H
ead
of B
PB
D
Jan
201
3 –
Mar
201
5 3
Enn
a M
okog
inta
H
ead
of B
PB
D
- J
an 2
013
C
oord
inat
or
- -
4
Out
put 1
D
isas
ter
Dat
a an
d In
form
atio
n M
embe
r 1
Ver
a D
atun
sola
ng, S
H
Hea
d of
Sub
Div
: Law
& H
uman
Res
ourc
es
5
Mem
ber
2 Ju
lian
ti P
onto
h, S
E
Staf
6 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 S
urya
Dha
rma,
SE
H
ead
of S
ecti
on: R
ehab
ilit
atio
n
7 O
utpu
t 3
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n,
and
Act
ion
Pla
n
Mem
ber
1 R
ukia
Has
an, S
E
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e
8 M
embe
r 2
Lil
i Tun
gkag
i St
af
9
Con
ting
ency
Pla
n an
d S
OP
M
embe
r 3
Eli
s L
ism
ayan
i, S
TP
H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e
10
Out
put 4
D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent D
rill
and
Exe
rcis
eM
embe
r 1
Abd
ul M
uis
Mok
odon
gan
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Com
mun
ity
Em
pow
erm
ent
11
C
omm
unit
y-ba
sed
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Man
agem
ent
Mem
ber
3 Ir
. I W
ayan
Dar
ma
Sec
reta
ry o
f B
PB
D
12
Mem
ber
4 F
arid
a B
ante
n, S
P
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: P
reve
ntio
n &
Pre
pare
dnes
s
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
P
erio
d 1
Kab
upat
en
Bol
aang
M
ongo
ndow
Team
Dir
ecto
r C
hann
y W
ayon
g H
ead
of B
PB
D
Oct
201
4 -
2 Ir
. Dad
ang
G. N
ugra
ha
Hea
d of
BP
BD
Ju
ly 2
013
– O
ct 2
014
3 D
juha
rdi D
amop
olii
H
ead
of B
PB
D
- Ju
ly 2
013
A-13
C
oord
inat
or
- -
4
Out
put 1
D
isas
ter
Dat
a an
d In
form
atio
n M
embe
r 1
Fer
dina
n P
asam
buna
, ST
H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Reh
abil
itat
ion
& R
econ
stru
ctio
n
5 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 H
j. D
iana
Wah
ab, S
H
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: P
reve
ntio
n &
Pre
pare
dnes
s
6 M
embe
r 2
Har
iadi
Kia
y M
asta
ri, S
T
Staf
f of
Reh
abil
itat
ion
& R
econ
stru
ctio
n
7 O
utpu
t 3
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n,
and
Act
ion
Pla
n
Mem
ber
1 D
evie
Mok
ogin
ta, S
E
Hea
d of
Sub
Div
: Pla
nnin
g &
Fin
ance
8 M
embe
r 2
Rat
naw
ati H
ayat
St
aff
of F
inan
ce
9
Con
ting
ency
Pla
n an
d S
OP
M
embe
r 3
Did
i Ari
sona
Pas
ambu
na
Staf
f of
Reh
abil
itat
ion
& R
econ
stru
ctio
n
10
Mem
ber
4 F
itri
L. A
mud
a St
aff
of P
repa
redn
ess
11
O
utpu
t 4
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Dri
ll a
nd
Exe
rcis
e M
embe
r 1
Mut
iara
End
ang
S. T
amm
u H
ead
of S
ecti
on: R
ehab
ilit
atio
n
12
Mem
ber
2 R
afik
And
hika
Ala
mri
, SE
St
aff
of E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
13
C
omm
unit
y-ba
sed
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Man
agem
ent
Mem
ber
3 K
ahar
uddi
n M
usta
fa, S
.Sos
H
ead
of S
ecti
on: C
omm
unit
y E
mpo
wer
men
t
14
Mem
ber
4 M
oh. A
li I
rwan
H
ead
of S
ecti
on: P
redi
sast
er
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
P
erio
d 1
Kab
upat
en
Bol
aang
M
ongo
ndow
U
tara
Team
Dir
ecto
r R
ober
t A. B
onde
H
ead
of B
PB
D
July
201
3 -
2 H
. Eri
ckso
n Te
gila
H
ead
of B
PB
D
- Ju
ly 2
013
C
oord
inat
or
- -
3
Out
put 1
D
isas
ter
Dat
a an
d In
form
atio
n M
embe
r 1
Ham
zah
Has
an, S
E
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: P
repa
redn
ess
4
Out
put 2
H
azar
d an
d R
isk
Map
s M
embe
r 1
Fit
ri R
ezek
i Las
abud
a, S
E
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Pre
dis
aste
r
5 O
utpu
t 3
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n,
and
Act
ion
Pla
n
Mem
ber
1 S
arw
an H
asan
Abi
din,
SE
H
ead
of S
ub D
ivis
ion:
Pla
nnin
g &
Fin
ance
6 C
onti
ngen
cy P
lan
and
SO
P
Mem
ber
3 H
endr
ikus
J. P
. Las
ut
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
7
Out
put 4
D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent D
rill
and
E
xerc
ise
Mem
ber
1 H
amdj
at P
aput
unga
n, S
.Pd
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: R
ehab
ilit
atio
n &
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
8
Mem
ber
2 B
udhi
yaw
an T
haw
ila,
A.M
d St
aff
9
Com
mun
ity-
base
d D
isas
ter
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t M
embe
r 4
Mas
itha
Hum
okor
, SE
H
ead
of S
ecti
on: C
omm
unit
y E
mpo
wer
men
t
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
P
erio
d 1
Kab
upat
en
Bol
aang
M
ongo
ndow
S
elat
an
Team
Dir
ecto
r Y
amin
Ism
ael
Hea
d of
BP
BD
Ju
ly 2
014
-
2 M
aspa
n M
us P
uwa
Hea
d of
BP
BD
-
July
201
4
Coo
rdin
ator
-
-
3 O
utpu
t 1
Dis
aste
r D
ata
and
Info
rmat
ion
Mem
ber
1 S
arin
a P
aput
unga
n, S
E
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
4
Out
put 2
H
azar
d an
d R
isk
Map
s M
embe
r 1
Sya
rifu
din
Sut
erto
, S.S
os
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: P
repa
redn
ess
5
Mem
ber
2 S
iti N
urai
n D
aud,
ST
H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: R
econ
stru
ctio
n
6 O
utpu
t 3
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n,
and
Act
ion
Pla
n
Mem
ber
1 D
rs. T
ham
rin
Moh
. Dau
n H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Reh
abil
itat
ion
& R
econ
stru
ctio
n
7 C
onti
ngen
cy P
lan
and
SO
P
Mem
ber
3 D
rs. R
olly
Lom
amay
H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: R
ehab
ilit
atio
n
8 O
utpu
t 4
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Dri
ll a
nd
Exe
rcis
e M
embe
r 1
Mah
yudi
n B
inol
F
inan
ce/T
reas
ury
9 C
omm
unit
y-ba
sed
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Man
agem
ent
Mem
ber
3 P
adla
n B
adu
Staf
f
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
P
erio
d 1
Kab
upat
en
Bol
aang
M
ongo
ndow
T
imur
Team
Dir
ecto
r Y
uliu
s P
elea
lu
Hea
d of
BP
BD
S
ept 2
014
-
2 A
djib
sard
jana
Has
an J
an
Hea
d of
BP
BD
M
ar 2
014
– S
ept 2
014
3 H
ario
no S
ugeh
a H
ead
of B
PB
D
- M
arch
201
4
Coo
rdin
ator
-
-
4 O
utpu
t 1
Dis
aste
r D
ata
and
Info
rmat
ion
Mem
ber
1 R
ism
an D
amop
olii
, SE
H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: R
ehab
ilit
atio
n
5 M
embe
r 2
Hap
it S
. Kad
engk
ang
Staf
f
A-14
6 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 H
endr
i K. L
aoh,
ST,
M.S
i H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Reh
abil
itat
ion
& R
econ
stru
ctio
n
7 M
embe
r 2
Adi
tya
M. R
antu
ng,
St
aff
8 O
utpu
t 3
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n,
and
Act
ion
Pla
n
Mem
ber
1 R
usm
in M
okoa
gow
S
ecre
tary
of
BP
BD
9 M
embe
r 2
Moh
amad
Riz
al
Staf
f
10
Con
ting
ency
Pla
n an
d S
OP
M
embe
r 3
Ala
n M
amon
to
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
& L
ogis
tic
11
M
embe
r 4
Fir
li M
oko
Staf
f
12
Out
put 4
D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent D
rill
and
E
xerc
ise
Mem
ber
1 A
gust
inus
Hey
dem
ans,
H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: P
rogr
am
13
M
embe
r 2
Sul
aeha
Um
ar A
lhei
d H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Pre
vent
ion
& P
repa
redn
ess
14
C
omm
unit
y-ba
sed
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Man
agem
ent
Mem
ber
3 S
heyl
a J.
E. T
uman
duk,
ST
H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: R
econ
stru
ctio
n
15
Mem
ber
4 V
ajri
Mok
oago
w
Staf
f
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
P
erio
d 1
Kab
upat
en
Min
ahas
a
Team
Dir
ecto
r Y
ohan
es A
. Pes
ik S
.IP
H
ead
of B
PB
D
July
201
3 -
2
Vec
ky K
aloh
H
ead
of B
PB
D
- Ju
ly 2
013
3 C
oord
inat
or
Lie
ke R
. Pon
gow
H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Pre
vent
ion
& P
repa
redn
ess
4
Out
put 1
D
isas
ter
Dat
a an
d In
form
atio
n M
embe
r 1
Sil
vana
Mam
angk
ey
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Log
isti
c
5 M
embe
r 2
Joik
e O
ndan
g H
ead
of S
ecti
on: P
reve
ntio
n
6 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 D
eisi
Suo
th
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Rec
onst
ruct
ion
7
Mem
ber
2 S
elvy
Man
engk
ey
Staf
f
8 O
utpu
t 3
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n,
and
Act
ion
Pla
n
Mem
ber
1 V
icto
r Ta
mba
riki
H
ead
of S
ecti
on: P
repa
redn
ess
9
Mem
ber
2 V
ivia
ntri
e W
atuk
angk
ow
Staf
f
10
Con
ting
ency
Pla
n an
d S
OP
M
embe
r 3
Vic
tor
Tam
bari
ki
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Pre
pare
dnes
s
11
Mem
ber
4 L
exie
Kor
engk
eng
Staf
f
12
Out
put 4
D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent D
rill
and
E
xerc
ise
Mem
ber
1 A
rthu
r L
onta
an
Hea
d of
Sub
Div
isio
n: G
ener
al A
ffai
rs
13
M
embe
r 2
Rom
my
Raw
ung
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e
14
Com
mun
ity-
base
d D
isas
ter
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t M
embe
r 3
Joik
e O
ndan
g H
ead
of S
ecti
on: P
reve
ntio
n
15
Mem
ber
4 S
evry
Mar
ingk
a St
aff
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
P
erio
d 1
Kab
upat
en
Min
ahas
a U
tara
Team
Dir
ecto
r D
r. R
osa
Hea
d of
BP
BD
Ja
nuar
y 20
13-
2 L
illy
Len
gkon
g H
ead
of B
PB
D
-Jan
uary
201
3 3
Coo
rdin
ator
P
etru
s M
acar
au
Sec
reta
ry o
f B
PB
D
4
Out
put 1
D
isas
ter
Dat
a an
d In
form
atio
n M
embe
r 1
Ir. E
rwin
F. P
. Sal
angk
a -
5
Mem
ber
2 D
rs. J
erm
ias
Lai
sina
St
aff
6 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 D
udy
H. S
. Fat
ah, S
H
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: P
reve
ntio
n &
Pre
pare
dnes
s
7 M
embe
r 2
Ron
ny P
esik
H
ead
of S
ecti
on: R
ehab
ilit
atio
n
8 O
utpu
t 3
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n,
and
Act
ion
Pla
n
Mem
ber
1 St
even
H. S
olan
g, S
T
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Rec
onst
ruct
ion
9
Mem
ber
2 Ju
nita
J. S
umol
ang,
SS
St
aff
10
C
onti
ngen
cy P
lan
and
SO
P
Mem
ber
3 S
ilva
na D
ebor
a L
egi,
SS
T
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e
11
Mem
ber
4 D
rs. J
erm
ias
Lai
sina
St
aff
12
O
utpu
t 4
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Dri
ll a
nd
Exe
rcis
e M
embe
r 1
Lai
dy G
irot
h, S
E
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
& L
ogis
tic
13
M
embe
r 2
Stev
en H
. Sol
ang,
ST
H
ead
of S
ecti
on: R
econ
stru
ctio
n
14
Com
mun
ity-
base
d D
isas
ter
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t M
embe
r 3
Fra
ns S
tefi
e P
aat,
S.S
os
Com
mun
ity
Em
pow
erm
ent
15
Mem
ber
4 D
jem
i Hep
py R
otin
sulu
H
ead
of S
ecti
on: L
ogis
tic
& E
vacu
atio
n
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
P
erio
d 1
Kab
upat
en
Min
ahas
a Te
am D
irec
tor
Han
drie
M. J
. Kom
alin
g H
ead
of B
PB
D
2
Coo
rdin
ator
N
anci
Lud
ong
Sek
reta
ris
BP
BD
A-15
3 S
elat
an
Out
put 1
D
isas
ter
Dat
a an
d In
form
atio
n M
embe
r 1
Ren
dy K
ewas
St
aff
4
Mem
ber
2 A
llan
M. O
. Mat
eka
Staf
f
5 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 N
anci
Lud
ong
Sek
reta
ris
BP
BD
6 M
embe
r 2
Step
hen
Pol
uaka
n H
ead
of S
ecti
on: R
econ
stru
ctio
n
7 O
utpu
t 3
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n,
and
Act
ion
Pla
n
Mem
ber
1 Jh
ony
M. T
amba
jong
H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e &
Log
isti
c
8 M
embe
r 2
Dav
e A
. Jan
sen
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Equ
ipm
ent &
Log
isti
cs
9
Con
ting
ency
Pla
n an
d S
OP
M
embe
r 3
Vec
ky P
elea
lu
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: P
reve
ntio
n &
Pre
pare
dnes
s
10
Mem
ber
4 E
vie
Sum
arab
H
ead
of S
ecti
on: P
reve
ntio
n
11
Out
put 4
D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent D
rill
and
E
xerc
ise
Mem
ber
1 R
endy
Kew
as
Staf
f
12
Mem
ber
2 F
adli
J. W
alal
angi
St
aff
13
C
omm
unit
y-ba
sed
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Man
agem
ent
Mem
ber
3 R
oyke
M. P
aat
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: R
ehab
ilit
atio
n &
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
14
Mem
ber
4 D
ave
A. J
anse
n H
ead
of S
ecti
on: E
quip
men
t & L
ogis
tics
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
P
erio
d 1
Kab
upat
en
Min
ahas
a Te
ngga
ra
Team
Dir
ecto
r Y
opi M
okod
aser
H
ead
of B
PB
D
Nov
201
4 -
2
(Ms)
. Roh
ana
Hea
d of
BP
BD
M
ar 2
014
– N
ov 2
014
3 W
elly
Mun
aise
che
Hea
d of
BP
BD
-
Mar
ch 2
014
C
oord
inat
or
-
4
Out
put 1
D
isas
ter
Dat
a an
d In
form
atio
n M
embe
r 1
Lan
ny D
. Wak
idin
, SH
H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: G
ener
al A
ffai
rs
5
Mem
ber
2 B
arth
olom
eus.
K. T
oiyo
, SE
St
aff
in P
reve
ntio
n &
Pre
pare
dnes
s
6 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 S
antj
e M
. Kum
esan
, SH
S
ecre
tary
of
BP
BD
7 M
embe
r 2
Ven
tje
F. D
. Rog
ahan
g H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e &
Log
isti
c
8 O
utpu
t 3
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n,
and
Act
ion
Pla
n
Mem
ber
1 W
elly
Mon
onim
bar,
SH
H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Fir
e F
ight
ing
9
Mem
ber
2 F
ebbi
anto
Abd
ul, S
H
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Pre
pare
dnes
s
10
Con
ting
ency
Pla
n an
d S
OP
M
embe
r 3
Fer
ah L
umbu
F
inan
ce/T
reas
ury
11
M
embe
r 4
Mei
lani
Dal
so, S
E
Staf
f of
Fin
ance
12
Out
put 4
D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent D
rill
and
E
xerc
ise
Mem
ber
1 E
rik
Man
aroi
nson
g H
ead
of S
ecti
on: P
reve
ntio
n
13
Mem
ber
2 M
eije
r W
. Mon
tol
Staf
f
14
Com
mun
ity-
base
d D
isas
ter
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t M
embe
r 3
Hen
drik
Mon
areh
H
ead
of S
ecti
on: L
ogis
tic
15
Mem
ber
4 Je
nive
r D
onny
Kad
ing
Staf
f
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
P
erio
d 1
Kab
upat
en
Kep
ulau
an
Sit
aro
Team
Dir
ecto
r B
ob W
uate
n H
ead
of B
PB
D (
Feb
201
4)
Feb
201
4 -
2 H
erry
Lan
o A
ctin
g H
ead
of B
PB
D
Jun
2013
– F
eb 2
014
3 E
lies
er P
osum
ah
Hea
d of
BP
BD
-
June
201
3
Coo
rdin
ator
-
4 O
utpu
t 1
Dis
aste
r D
ata
and
Info
rmat
ion
Mem
ber
1 W
ense
slau
s P.
Rum
baja
n St
aff
5
Mem
ber
2 D
eysi
N. H
arm
anse
s St
aff
6 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 R
ino
Igna
tius
Kal
alo,
ST
St
aff
7
Mem
ber
2 Y
oula
V. M
. Sen
gkey
, SE
St
aff
8
Out
put 3
R
egio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan,
an
d A
ctio
n P
lan
M
embe
r 1
Jihm
y Ta
taun
g, S
T. M
T
Hea
d of
Sub
Div
: Pre
disa
ster
9 M
embe
r 2
Yen
i Fri
tsti
yant
i, S
. Sos
St
aff
10
C
onti
ngen
cy P
lan
and
SO
P
Mem
ber
3 Ja
ck N
alen
g, S
IP
Sec
reta
ry o
f B
PB
D
11
M
embe
r 4
Muh
amm
ad F
. N. V
an G
obel
St
aff
12
O
utpu
t 4
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Dri
ll a
nd
Exe
rcis
e M
embe
r 1
Rus
li F
. Baw
oton
g, S
H
Staf
f
13
Mem
ber
2 M
aria
ny W
inny
Mas
ala
Staf
f
14
Com
mun
ity-
base
d D
isas
ter
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t M
embe
r 3
Her
ians
Kau
mbu
r, S
P
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: R
ehab
ilit
atio
n &
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
15
Mem
ber
4 W
ulla
n M
arga
ret,
ST
St
aff
A-16
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
P
erio
d 1
Kab
upat
en
Kep
ulau
an
San
gihe
Team
Dir
ecto
r R
eint
je B
. Tam
boto
H
ead
of B
PB
D
Coo
rdin
ator
-
2 O
utpu
t 1
Dis
aste
r D
ata
and
Info
rmat
ion
Mem
ber
1 M
arth
ini K
aset
i St
aff
of S
ecre
tari
at
3
Mem
ber
2 F
atri
ni E
lina
Ake
de
Staf
f of
Div
isio
n: P
reve
ntio
n &
Pre
pare
dnes
s
4 M
embe
r 3
F. P
. Tem
pom
ona
Staf
f of
Div
isio
n: R
ehab
ilit
atio
n &
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
5 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 M
achs
Tak
asih
aeng
H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: P
reve
ntio
n
6 M
embe
r 2
Janu
ar E
. Kak
asih
St
aff
of D
ivis
ion:
Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e
7 M
embe
r 3
M. B
. Gag
hana
H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e
8 M
embe
r 4
Indo
Suk
maw
ati
Staf
f of
Div
isio
n: R
ehab
ilit
atio
n &
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
9
Out
put 3
R
egio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan,
an
d A
ctio
n P
lan
M
embe
r 1
V. D
J. K
ekun
g H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Pre
vent
ion
& P
repa
redn
ess
19
M
embe
r 2
Mac
hs T
akas
ihae
ng
Hea
d of
Sub
Div
: Pre
vent
ion
11
M
embe
r 3
All
and
S. L
ahin
da
Staf
f of
Sec
reta
riat
12
Con
ting
ency
Pla
n an
d S
OP
M
embe
r 4
V. D
J. K
ekun
g H
ead
of D
ivis
ion:
Pre
vent
ion
& P
repa
redn
ess
13
M
embe
r 5
R. N
. W. S
embi
hing
an
Hea
d of
Sub
Div
: Hum
an R
esou
rces
14
Mem
ber
6 S
am Y
. Lon
do
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
& L
ogis
tic
15
M
embe
r 7
D. Z
. Tum
bal
Hea
d of
Sub
Div
: Pre
pare
dnes
s
16
Out
put 4
D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent D
rill
and
E
xerc
ise
Mem
ber
1 D
. Z. T
umba
l H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: P
repa
redn
ess
17
M
embe
r 2
Janu
ar E
. Kak
asih
St
aff
of D
ivis
ion:
Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e
18
Mem
ber
3 F.
Ron
gkon
usa
Hea
d of
Sub
Div
: Pro
gram
19
Com
mun
ity-
base
d D
isas
ter
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t M
embe
r 4
D. Z
. Tum
bal
Hea
d of
Sub
Div
: Pre
pare
dnes
s
20
Mem
ber
5 M
arth
ini K
aset
i St
aff
of S
ecre
tari
at
21
M
embe
r 6
M. B
imba
naun
g H
ead
of S
ub D
iv: L
ogis
tic
22
Mem
ber
7 V
. DJ.
Kek
ung
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: P
reve
ntio
n &
Pre
pare
dnes
s
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
P
erio
d 1
Kab
upat
en
Kep
ulau
an
Tala
ud
Team
Dir
ecto
r H
abel
Sal
ombe
H
ead
of B
PB
D
Coo
rdin
ator
-
2 O
utpu
t 1
Dis
aste
r D
ata
and
Info
rmat
ion
Mem
ber
1 M
usaf
aif
Kas
ili
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Pre
vent
ion
& P
repa
redn
ess
3
Mem
ber
2 H
aric
e A
siga
St
aff
of S
ecre
tari
at
4 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 A
brah
am K
obi
Staf
f of
Sec
tion
: Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e &
Log
isti
c
5 M
embe
r 2
Jony
Lin
gkas
St
aff
of S
ecti
on: P
reve
ntio
n &
Pre
pare
dnes
s
6 O
utpu
t 3
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n,
and
Act
ion
Pla
n
Mem
ber
1 P
atni
Tah
ulen
di
Staf
f of
Sec
reta
riat
7 M
embe
r 2
Arn
i Anu
mpi
tan
Staf
f of
Sec
tion
: Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e &
Log
isti
c
8 C
onti
ngen
cy P
lan
and
SO
P
Mem
ber
3 B
less
y S
iby
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e &
Log
isti
c
9 M
embe
r 4
Mat
rina
i Lap
asi
Staf
f of
Sec
tion
: Pre
vent
ion
& P
repa
redn
ess
10
O
utpu
t 4
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Dri
ll a
nd
Exe
rcis
e M
embe
r 1
Juli
andr
i Win
owod
a St
aff
of S
ecti
on: R
ehab
ilit
atio
n &
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
11
M
embe
r 2
Jola
nda
Gal
a St
aff
of S
ecre
tari
at
12
C
omm
unit
y-ba
sed
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Man
agem
ent
Mem
ber
3 S
emue
l May
usip
S
ecre
tary
of
BP
BD
13
Mem
ber
4 D
elfi
st T
aari
wua
n St
aff
of S
ecre
tari
at
4) C
/Ps
from
Kab
upat
en a
nd K
ota
BPB
D in
Wes
t Nus
a T
engg
ara
Pro
vinc
e
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
Ja
pane
se C
ount
erpa
rt
1 P
rovi
nce
Team
Dir
ecto
r Ir
. Wed
ha M
agm
a A
rdhi
, MT
P
Hea
d of
BP
BD
(A
ug 2
013
– no
w)
Coo
rdin
ator
2
Out
put 2
D
isas
ter
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
appi
ng
Mem
ber
1 Ir
. L. H
adi W
ijay
a, M
.Si
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n fo
r P
reve
ntio
n &
Pre
pare
dnes
s K
enji
MO
RIT
A
3 M
embe
r 2
Ir. H
. Ahy
ar J
unai
di, M
T
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n: R
ehab
ilit
atio
n an
d R
econ
stru
ctio
n
Sug
io I
mam
ura
4 M
embe
r 3
Ibra
him
Kur
niaw
an, S
E
Staf
f of
Pro
gram
Sub
-Div
isio
n A
kihi
ro F
UR
UTA
A-17
5 O
utpu
t 3
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t P
lan
and
Act
ion
Pla
n M
embe
r 1
Ari
fudd
in, S
T
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n fo
r E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
and
Log
isti
c
Ryo
ji T
AK
AH
AS
HI
6 M
embe
r 2
Mus
taki
m, S
T, M
T
Staf
f of
Pro
gram
Sub
-Div
isio
n
Kat
su K
AT
O
7 M
embe
r 3
Rid
ho A
hyan
a, S
IP
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
for
Pre
pare
dnes
s
8
Mem
ber
4 A
gung
Pra
muj
a, S
.Adm
H
ead
of S
ecti
on: E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
9
Out
put 4
C
omm
unit
y B
ased
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Man
agem
ent
Mem
ber
1 Ir
. L. H
adi W
ijay
a, M
.Si
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n fo
r P
reve
ntio
n &
Pre
pare
dnes
s M
iki K
OD
AM
A
10
Mem
ber
2 R
idho
Ahy
ana,
SIP
H
ead
of S
ecti
on f
or P
repa
redn
ess
Y
oko
OTA
11
M
embe
r 3
H. D
arw
is, S
.Sos
H
ead
of S
ecti
on: P
reve
ntio
n
12
Mem
ber
4 Is
band
ono,
SK
M
Hea
d of
Sec
tion
: Reh
abil
itat
ion
5) C
/Ps
from
Kab
upat
en a
nd K
ota
BPB
D in
Wes
t Nus
a T
engg
ara
Pro
vinc
e
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
Ja
pane
se C
ount
erpa
rt
1
Kot
a M
atar
am
Team
Dir
ecto
r S
upar
di, M
T
Hea
d of
BP
BD
(Ju
ni 2
014
– no
w)
2
Coo
rdin
ator
Ir
. H. S
afru
din
Ali
S
ecre
tary
of
BP
BD
3 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 Ir
. Hus
nil I
mam
San
usi
Hea
d of
Reh
abil
itat
ion
& R
econ
stru
ctio
n D
ivis
ion
Ken
ji M
OR
ITA
4
Mem
ber
2 D
rs. L
alu
Asm
awa
Hea
d of
Pla
nnin
g S
ub-D
ivis
ion
Sug
io I
mam
ura
5 M
embe
r 3
Ant
onio
Ren
dra
S.
Staf
f A
kihi
ro F
UR
UTA
6
Out
put 3
R
egio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan,
an
d A
ctio
n P
lan
M
embe
r 1
Drs
. Zae
nudi
n H
ead
of R
ehab
ilit
atio
n &
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
Div
isio
n R
yoji
TA
KA
HA
SH
I 7
Mem
ber
2 H
. Nas
rudi
n, S
P., S
.Sos
., M
M
Hea
d of
Pre
pare
dnes
s S
ecti
on
Kat
su K
AT
O
8 O
utpu
t 4
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Dri
ll a
nd
Exe
rcis
e M
embe
r 1
Sup
arm
an, S
H
Hea
d of
Em
erge
ncy
and
Log
isti
c S
ecti
on
Mik
i KO
DA
MA
9
Mem
ber
2 S
udio
no, S
IP
Hea
d of
Pre
vent
ion
Sec
tion
Y
oko
OTA
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
Ja
pane
se C
ount
erpa
rt
1
Kab
upat
en
Lom
bok
Uta
ra
Team
Dir
ecto
r R
aden
Tre
snaw
ati,
S.S
os
Hea
d of
BP
BD
(Ja
nuar
y 20
15 –
now
)
2 M
oh. I
wan
Mar
et A
smar
a H
ead
of B
PB
D (
Feb
ruar
i 201
2 –
Janu
ary
2015
)
3 C
oord
inat
or
Aki
Tre
sna
Bha
kti,
S.P
d S
ecre
tary
of
BP
BD
4 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 S
aifu
l Bah
ri
Staf
f K
enji
MO
RIT
A
5 M
embe
r 2
Ahm
ad Z
aenu
din
Staf
f S
ugio
Im
amur
a 6
Mem
ber
3 D
arsi
dep
Ban
yu A
ji
Staf
f A
kihi
ro F
UR
UTA
7
Out
put 3
R
egio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan,
an
d A
ctio
n P
lan
M
embe
r 1
Wiw
in F
atri
ya N
ings
ih
Staf
f of
Sec
reta
riat
R
yoji
TA
KA
HA
SH
I 8
Mem
ber
2 B
asuk
i Cat
ur T
ejo
U.
Staf
f of
Sec
reta
riat
K
atsu
KA
TO
9
Mem
ber
3 M
. Sa’
i, P
d.i
Mem
ber
of Q
uick
Res
pons
e Te
am
10
O
utpu
t 4
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Dri
ll a
nd
Exe
rcis
e M
embe
r 1
Asd
iant
o St
aff
Mik
i KO
DA
MA
11
M
embe
r 2
Ham
rull
ah
Staf
f Y
oko
OTA
12
M
embe
r 3
Mun
ir
Staf
f
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
Ja
pane
se C
ount
erpa
rt
1
Kab
upat
en
Lom
bok
Bar
at
Team
Dir
ecto
r D
rs. H
. Muh
naji
b, M
M
Hea
d of
BP
BD
(Ja
nuar
y 20
15 –
now
)
2
Drs
. Hal
awi M
usta
fa K
holi
di
Hea
d of
BP
BD
(Ja
nuar
y 20
14 –
Jan
uary
201
5)
3
Coo
rdin
ator
D
ewa
Ket
ut A
rdan
a, S
H, M
H
Sec
reta
ry o
f B
PB
D
4
Out
put 2
H
azar
d an
d R
isk
Map
s M
embe
r 1
Moh
. Ily
as, S
H
Hea
d of
Pre
vent
ion
and
Pre
pare
dnes
s D
ivis
ion
Ken
ji M
OR
ITA
5
Mem
ber
2 Ir
. H. A
bdul
Azi
s H
ead
of R
econ
stru
ctio
n S
ecti
on
Sug
io I
mam
ura
6 M
embe
r 3
Anw
ar S
adar
, ST
St
aff
of E
mer
genc
y an
d L
ogis
tic
Div
isio
n A
kihi
ro F
UR
UTA
7
Out
put 3
R
egio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan,
an
d A
ctio
n P
lan
M
embe
r 1
Drs
. H. A
bdul
lah,
MM
H
ead
of P
reve
ntio
n S
ecti
on
Ryo
ji T
AK
AH
AS
HI
8 M
embe
r 2
Imro
n R
osid
in, S
E
Hea
d of
Pla
nnin
g an
d P
rogr
am S
ub-D
ivis
ion
Kat
su K
AT
O
9 M
embe
r 3
Nan
da K
urni
awan
, ST
St
aff
of P
reve
ntio
n an
d P
repa
redn
ess
Div
isio
n
10
Out
put 4
D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent D
rill
and
E
xerc
ise
Mem
ber
1 D
rs. H
. Abd
ulla
h, M
M
Staf
f
Mik
i KO
DA
MA
11
M
embe
r 2
Tohr
i, S
.IP
H
ead
of P
repa
redn
ess
Div
isio
n Y
oko
OTA
12
M
embe
r 3
Sla
met
Kar
yadi
, A.M
d St
aff
of P
reve
ntio
n an
d P
repa
redn
ess
Div
isio
n
13
Mem
ber
4 A
mri
llah
St
aff
of P
reve
ntio
n an
d P
repa
redn
ess
Div
isio
n
A-18
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
Ja
pane
se C
ount
erpa
rt
1
Kab
upat
en
Lom
bok
Teng
ah
Team
Dir
ecto
r L
alu
Nur
puri
, S.I
P
Hea
d of
BP
BD
(Ja
nuar
i 201
3 –
now
)
2 C
oord
inat
or
Sah
abud
in, S
H
Sec
reta
ry o
f B
PB
D
3
Out
put 2
H
azar
d an
d R
isk
Map
s M
embe
r 1
Suh
arto
, SH
H
ead
of E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
Sub
-Div
isio
n K
enji
MO
RIT
A
4 M
embe
r 2
Ari
da N
uriz
an, S
T
Staf
f S
ugio
Im
amur
a 5
Mem
ber
3 L
alu
Erw
in R
ahm
an, S
T
Staf
f A
kihi
ro F
UR
UTA
6
Out
put 3
R
egio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan,
an
d A
ctio
n P
lan
M
embe
r 1
Mar
is, S
.Sos
H
ead
of P
repa
redn
ess
Sub
-Div
isio
n R
yoji
TA
KA
HA
SH
I 7
Mem
ber
2 L
alu
Mun
ardi
, S.K
om, M
M
Staf
f K
atsu
KA
TO
8
Mem
ber
3 H
alik
, S.S
os
Staf
f
9 O
utpu
t 4
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Dri
ll a
nd
Exe
rcis
e M
embe
r 1
Eru
Jun
iant
o, S
.Sos
H
ead
of P
reve
ntio
n S
ub-D
ivis
ion
Mik
i KO
DA
MA
10
M
embe
r 2
Mus
tafa
Kam
al J
auha
ri, S
.Sos
St
aff
Yok
o O
TA
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
Ja
pane
se C
ount
erpa
rt
1
Kab
upat
en
Lom
bok
Tim
ur
Team
Dir
ecto
r D
rs. H
. Nap
si, M
M.
Hea
d of
BP
BD
(Ja
nuar
y 20
15 –
now
)
2 Ir
. H. A
bdul
Hak
im, M
M.
Hea
d of
BP
BD
(Ja
nuar
y 20
13 –
Jan
uary
201
5)
3
Coo
rdin
ator
H
. Kar
tini
, ST
S
ecre
tary
of
BP
BD
4 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 H
. Hid
ayat
, SH
, MH
H
ead
of P
reve
ntio
n an
d P
repa
redn
ess
Div
isio
n K
enji
MO
RIT
A
5 M
embe
r 2
Nur
ul I
lham
, S.S
os
Hea
d of
Pre
pare
dnes
s S
ecti
on
Sug
io I
mam
ura
6 M
embe
r 3
Tauf
an S
apar
di
Staf
f A
kihi
ro F
UR
UTA
7
Out
put 3
R
egio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan,
an
d A
ctio
n P
lan
M
embe
r 1
Lal
u R
usna
n, S
.Sos
H
ead
of P
rogr
am a
nd R
epor
ting
Sub
-Div
isio
n R
yoji
TA
KA
HA
SH
I 8
Mem
ber
2 L
alu
Suh
erm
an, S
.Sos
H
ead
of E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
Sub
-Div
isio
n K
atsu
KA
TO
9
Mem
ber
3 M
uh. I
khsa
n P
lato
on C
omm
ando
r of
Fir
e F
ight
er
10
O
utpu
t 4
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Dri
ll a
nd
Exe
rcis
e M
embe
r 1
Lal
u U
mar
dani
H
ead
of R
econ
stru
ctio
n S
ecti
on
Mik
i KO
DA
MA
11
M
embe
r 2
Yul
iadi
Her
man
to
Staf
f Y
oko
OTA
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
Ja
pane
se C
ount
erpa
rt
1
Kab
upat
en
Sum
baw
a
Team
Dir
ecto
r Ir
. Muk
min
, M.S
i H
ead
of B
PB
D (
Feb
ruar
i 201
2 –
now
)
2 C
oord
inat
or
Dra
. Hj.
Juri
ah
Sec
reta
ry o
f B
PB
D
3
Out
put 2
H
azar
d an
d R
isk
Map
s M
embe
r 1
Moh
. Gan
efi,
A.P
i H
ead
of P
reve
ntio
n an
d P
repa
redn
ess
Div
isio
n K
enji
MO
RIT
A
4 M
embe
r 2
Rah
mat
H
ead
of P
repa
redn
ess
Sec
tion
S
ugio
Im
amur
a 5
Mem
ber
3 Ja
lalu
ddin
St
aff
Aki
hiro
FU
RU
TA
6 M
embe
r 4
Wah
yu I
ndra
jaya
, ST
St
aff
7
Out
put 3
R
egio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan,
an
d A
ctio
n P
lan
M
embe
r 1
Abd
. Rau
f, S
.Sos
H
ead
of P
rogr
am a
nd R
epor
ting
Sub
-Div
isio
n R
yoji
TA
KA
HA
SH
I 8
Mem
ber
2 S
iti A
min
ah, S
T
Hea
d of
Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e S
ub-D
ivis
ion
Kat
su K
AT
O
9 M
embe
r 3
Sup
ri, S
T
Staf
f of
Sec
reta
riat
10
Mem
ber
4 N
uraw
an Z
aput
ra, S
T
Pla
toon
Com
man
dor
of F
ire
Fig
hter
11
Out
put 4
D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent D
rill
and
E
xerc
ise
Mem
ber
1 D
rs. U
sman
H
ead
of R
econ
stru
ctio
n S
ecti
on
Mik
i KO
DA
MA
12
M
embe
r 2
Sya
msu
ddin
Nur
St
aff
Yok
o O
TA
13
Mem
ber
3 T
urin
o Ju
naid
i, S
.Sos
St
aff
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
Ja
pane
se C
ount
erpa
rt
1
Kab
upat
en
Sum
baw
a B
arat
Team
Dir
ecto
r D
rs. T
holi
b A
bdul
lah
Hea
d of
BP
BD
(Ju
li 2
013
– no
w)
2
Coo
rdin
ator
M
ukhl
is D
M
Hea
d of
Sec
reta
riat
3 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 N
ofir
zal Z
hain
syah
, SE
H
ead
of R
ehab
ilit
atio
n an
d R
econ
stru
ctio
n D
ivis
ion
Ken
ji M
OR
ITA
4
Mem
ber
2 H
asan
udin
H
ead
of G
ener
al A
ffai
r an
d St
affi
ng S
ub-D
ivis
ion
Sug
io I
mam
ura
5 M
embe
r 3
Muh
amm
ad N
aian
, ST
St
aff
of B
appe
da
Aki
hiro
FU
RU
TA
6 O
utpu
t 3
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n,
and
Act
ion
Pla
n
Mem
ber
1 Y
ulia
nur,
ST
H
ead
of R
econ
stru
ctio
n S
ecti
on
Ryo
ji T
AK
AH
AS
HI
7 M
embe
r 2
Kam
aria
h S
yam
sih
Staf
f of
Sec
reta
riat
K
atsu
KA
TO
A-19
8 M
embe
r 3
Dya
h S
apta
rini
, S.S
i H
ead
of P
lann
ing
and
Pro
gram
For
mul
atio
in S
ub-D
ivis
ion
9
Out
put 4
D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent D
rill
and
E
xerc
ise
Mem
ber
1 M
uham
mad
Rif
ai
Hea
d of
Pre
pare
dnes
s S
ecti
on
Mik
i KO
DA
MA
10
M
embe
r 2
Muh
amm
ad, S
AP
H
ead
of L
ogis
tic
Sec
tion
Y
oko
OTA
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
Ja
pane
se C
ount
erpa
rt
1
Kab
upat
en
Dom
pu
Team
Dir
ecto
r D
rs. I
mra
n M
. Has
an
Hea
d of
BP
BD
(Ju
ni 2
013
– no
w)
2
Coo
rdin
ator
D
rs. S
upar
man
S
ecre
tary
of
BP
BD
3 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 A
hyan
syah
, S.S
os
Hea
d of
Pre
vent
ion
and
Pre
pare
dnes
s S
ecti
on
Ken
ji M
OR
ITA
4
Mem
ber
2 A
bdul
Lat
if
Staf
f S
ugio
Im
amur
a 5
Mem
ber
3 Ju
naid
in
Staf
f A
kihi
ro F
urut
a 6
Out
put 3
R
egio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan,
an
d A
ctio
n P
lan
M
embe
r 1
Ir. A
ghan
syah
H
ead
of R
ehab
ilit
atio
n an
d R
econ
stru
ctio
n S
ecti
on
Ryo
ji T
AK
AH
AS
HI
7 M
embe
r 2
Kah
arud
in, S
E
Staf
f K
atsu
KA
TO
8
Mem
ber
3 A
mir
uddi
n St
aff
9
Out
put 4
D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent D
rill
and
E
xerc
ise
Mem
ber
1 M
. Sal
eh
Staf
f M
iki K
OD
AM
A
10
Mem
ber
2 A
rifi
n, A
md
Staf
f Y
oko
OTA
11
M
embe
r 3
Isw
an
Staf
f
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
Ja
pane
se C
ount
erpa
rt
1
Kot
a B
ima
Team
Dir
ecto
r D
rs. H
. M. F
akhr
unra
ji, M
E
Hea
d of
BP
BD
(O
ktob
er 2
012
– no
w)
2
Coo
rdin
ator
D
rs. H
amda
n S
ecre
tary
of
BP
BD
3 C
oord
inat
or
H. E
fend
i Ism
ail,
SE
H
ead
of P
reve
ntio
n an
d P
repa
redn
ess
Div
isio
n
4 O
utpu
t 2
Haz
ard
and
Ris
k M
aps
Mem
ber
1 Im
maw
an M
usli
min
, ST,
M.E
ng
Hea
d of
Pre
vent
ion
Sec
tion
K
enji
MO
RIT
A
5 M
embe
r 2
Ari
f R
usm
an E
fend
i, S
T, M
.Eng
H
ead
of D
ata
and
Stat
isti
c S
ub-D
ivis
ion,
Bap
peda
S
ugio
Im
amur
a 6
Mem
ber
3 A
di A
khw
an, S
T, M
.Eng
, M.S
c H
ead
of R
egio
n F
acil
ity,
Bap
peda
A
kihi
ro F
urut
a 7
Out
put 3
R
egio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan,
an
d A
ctio
n P
lan
M
embe
r 1
Drs
. H. M
uhta
r Yas
in, M
AP
H
ead
of C
omm
issi
on A
, Kot
a B
ima
Par
liam
ent
Ryo
ji T
AK
AH
AS
HI
8 M
embe
r 2
Ir. T
afsi
r H
ead
of S
ocia
l and
Cul
ture
, Bap
peda
K
atsu
KA
TO
9
Mem
ber
3 A
bdur
ahm
an, S
T
Tem
p. H
ead
of R
ehab
ilit
atio
n an
d R
econ
stru
ctio
n D
ivis
ion
10
M
embe
r 4
Sur
yani
, SE
H
ead
of P
rogr
am S
ub-D
ivis
ion
11
O
utpu
t 4
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Dri
ll a
nd
Exe
rcis
e M
embe
r 1
Hid
ayat
, Sm
Hk
Tem
p. H
ead
of L
ogis
tic
and
Em
erge
ncy
Div
isio
n M
iki K
OD
AM
A
12
Mem
ber
2 M
asri
n, S
.Pt
Hea
d of
Pre
pare
dnes
s S
ecti
on
Yok
o O
TA
Pos
itio
n in
the
Pro
ject
N
ame
Pos
itio
n in
BP
BD
Ja
pane
se C
ount
erpa
rt
1
Kab
upat
en
Bim
a
Team
Dir
ecto
r D
rs. H
. Sum
arso
no, S
H
Hea
d of
BP
BD
(Ja
nuar
y 20
15 –
now
)
2 A
bdul
Wah
ab, S
H
Hea
d of
BP
BD
(...
– J
anua
ry 2
015)
3 C
oord
inat
or
Indr
a N
urja
ya, S
H
Sec
reta
ry o
f B
PB
D
4
Out
put 2
H
azar
d an
d R
isk
Map
s M
embe
r 1
Ari
es M
unan
dar,
ST.
MT.
H
ead
of P
reve
ntio
n an
d P
repa
redn
ess
Div
isio
n K
enji
MO
RIT
A
5 M
embe
r 2
Sha
lahu
ddin
, ST
H
ead
of R
ehab
ilit
atio
n S
ecti
on
Sug
io I
mam
ura
6 M
embe
r 3
Aji
Sup
rayo
gi
Staf
f A
kihi
ro F
urut
a 7
Out
put 3
R
egio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan,
an
d A
ctio
n P
lan
M
embe
r 1
A. R
ifai
, ST
H
ead
of R
ehab
ilit
atio
n an
d R
econ
stru
ctio
n D
ivis
ion
Ryo
ji T
AK
AH
AS
HI
8 M
embe
r 2
M. G
unaw
an, S
.Si
Hea
d of
Pro
gram
and
Rep
orti
ng S
ub-D
ivis
ion
Kat
su K
AT
O
9 M
embe
r 3
Rud
i Har
tono
, S.S
os
Hea
d of
em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e S
ecti
on
10
O
utpu
t 4
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Dri
ll a
nd
Exe
rcis
e M
embe
r 1
Zul
kifl
i H. A
bidi
n, S
.Sos
H
ead
of P
reve
ntio
n S
ecti
on
Mik
i KO
DA
MA
11
M
embe
r 2
Dad
an K
usda
na
Hea
d of
Pre
pare
dnes
s S
ecti
on
Yok
o O
TA
A-20
Ap
pen
dix
9: O
per
atio
n B
ud
get
Japa
nese
Sid
e
(Cur
renc
y: J
PY
)
Item
s F
Y20
11
Jul 2
011
– M
ar 2
012
FY
2012
Apr
201
2 –
Mar
201
3
FY
2013
Apr
201
3 –
Mar
201
4
FY
2014
Apr
201
4 -
Mar
201
5
FY
2015
Apr
201
5 -
Pre
sent
T
otal
Ope
rati
onal
Exp
ense
s
(inc
ludi
ng ,
rem
uner
atio
n of
loca
l sta
ff, c
ar r
enta
l cos
t)
3,42
2,24
0 12
,454
,538
16
,718
,008
20,9
99,6
80N
.A53
,594
,466
Pur
chas
e of
Equ
ipm
ent
(inc
ludi
ng ,
prin
ter,
plo
tter
, com
pute
r )
869,
001
3,93
9,95
7 51
1,75
83,
044,
459
N.A
8,36
5,17
5
Cou
nter
part
Tra
inin
g
(inc
ludi
ng ,
tran
spor
tati
on c
ost,
text
boo
k, v
enue
) 0
1,11
3,77
7 0
1,22
3,96
2N
.A2,
337,
739
Tot
al
4,29
1,24
1 17
,508
,272
17
,229
,766
23,8
84,4
47
64,2
97,3
80
Indo
nesi
an S
ide
(C
urre
ncy:
ID
R)
Item
s F
Y20
11
Jul 2
011
– M
ar 2
012
FY
2012
Apr
201
2 –
Mar
201
3
FY
2013
Apr
201
3 –
Mar
201
4
FY
2014
Apr
201
4 -
Mar
201
5
FY
2015
Apr
201
5 -
Pre
sent
T
otal
Tot
al
A-21
Ap
pen
dix
10:
Res
ult
Gri
d (
Ach
ieve
men
t of
Ind
icat
ors)
N
arra
tive
Sum
mar
y V
erif
iabl
e In
dica
tors
C
urre
nt S
tatu
s A
sses
smen
t O
vera
ll G
oal
The
pro
vinc
ial B
PB
Ds
as w
ell
as th
e re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
BP
BD
s be
side
the
targ
et a
reas
ar
e es
tabl
ishe
d, a
nd th
e di
sast
er
man
agem
ent c
apac
itie
s of
them
ar
e en
hanc
ed b
y us
ing
mat
eria
ls
form
ulat
ed a
nd m
etho
dolo
gy
esta
blis
hed
in th
e pr
ojec
t.
The
num
ber
of p
rovi
nces
as
wel
l as
reg
enci
es/m
unic
ipal
itie
s th
at
appl
y th
e m
etho
dolo
gies
es
tabl
ishe
d in
the
Pro
ject
for
ac
cum
ulat
ing
disa
ster
dat
a,
crea
ting
haz
ard
and
risk
map
s,
form
ulat
ing
regi
onal
dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t pla
n an
d co
nduc
ting
di
sast
er m
anag
emen
t exe
rcis
e.
・ O
utpu
t 5 (
e.g.
dis
sem
inat
ion
of th
e Te
chni
cal G
uide
line
for
for
mul
atio
n of
RD
MP
) w
as a
dded
to P
DM
to b
ridg
e th
e ga
p be
twee
n th
e P
roje
ct P
urpo
se a
nd th
e O
vera
ll G
oal.
At p
rese
nt, h
owev
er, t
he a
ppli
cati
on o
f m
etho
dolo
gies
is s
till
lim
ited
wit
hin
the
targ
et
prov
ince
s an
d re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
only
. O
ngoi
ng a
ctiv
ity
of O
utpu
t 5 (
e.g.
the
endo
rsem
ent/
appr
oval
of
the
Tech
nica
l G
uide
line
by
BN
PB
and
pos
sibl
e di
ssem
inat
ion
of th
e gu
idel
ine
in th
e di
sast
er m
anag
emen
t wee
k in
Oct
ober
201
5) w
ould
pro
mpt
th
e ad
vanc
emen
t tow
ards
the
Ove
rall
Goa
l.
・ D
isse
min
atio
n co
uld
be p
ossi
ble
if th
e Te
chni
cal G
uide
line
wou
ld b
e us
ed in
trai
ning
con
duct
ed a
t Ina
-DR
TG
.
Not
A
chie
ved
Pro
ject
Pur
pose
T
he d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent
capa
citi
es o
f B
NP
B, t
he
prov
inci
al B
PB
Ds,
and
the
rege
ncy/
mun
icip
alit
y B
PB
Ds
in
the
targ
et a
rea
are
enha
nced
.
1. N
umbe
r or
Cas
es th
a t R
egio
nal
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n (R
DM
P)
form
ulat
ed th
roug
h th
e P
roje
ct p
roce
ssed
to a
ppro
ve b
y th
e lo
cal a
utho
rity
.
・ A
ll th
e 14
Kab
/Kot
a R
DM
Ps
in S
UL
UT
wer
e ap
prov
ed b
y th
e he
ad o
f B
NP
Bs.
(A
s of
Apr
il 2
015,
nin
e R
DM
Ps
out o
f th
e 14
w
ere
also
app
rove
d by
the
may
or o
f K
ab/K
ota)
Targ
et P
rovi
nce
Num
ber
of R
DM
Ps
form
ulat
ed b
y th
e P
roje
ct
Num
ber
of R
DM
Ps
appr
oved
by
the
loca
l aut
hori
ty (
Hea
d of
BP
BD
) N
orth
Sul
awes
i Pro
vinc
e (S
UL
UT
) 14
(co
mpl
eted
)
14
Wes
t Nus
a Te
ngga
ra (
NT
B)
10 (
curr
entl
y un
der
form
ulat
ion)
- ・
10 K
ab/K
ota
RD
MP
s in
NT
B c
urre
ntly
bei
ng f
orm
ulat
ed in
the
Pro
ject
are
als
o ex
pect
ed to
be
appr
oved
upo
n th
eir
com
plet
ion.
Par
tial
ly
Ach
ieve
d (a
ctiv
itie
s in
N
TB
sti
ll
ongo
ing)
2. N
umbe
r of
vol
unta
ry d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent e
xerc
ises
con
duct
ed
in th
e co
mm
unit
ies
wit
hin
the
targ
et a
rea.
・A
t lea
st 6
vol
unta
ry d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent e
xerc
ises
wer
e id
enti
fied
aft
er a
ctiv
itie
s in
SU
LU
T w
as c
ompl
eted
.
Lev
el
D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent E
xerc
ise
Pro
vinc
e
1)B
PB
D S
UL
UT
org
aniz
ed a
n ev
alua
tion
dri
ll o
n 4
Oct
ober
201
3 at
gov
erno
r’s
fiel
d of
fice
, in
volv
ing
300
pers
onne
l fro
m B
PB
D M
anad
o, B
PB
D T
omoh
on, a
rmy,
pro
vinc
ial h
ealt
h of
fice
, P
MI,
and
oth
er in
stit
utio
ns.
T
he n
ext d
ay o
f th
e dr
ill,
stak
ehol
der
show
ed th
eir
reso
urce
s. E
ach
agen
cy d
emon
stra
ted
how
to
use
equi
pmen
t.
R
egen
cy a
nd
Mun
icip
alit
y
2)B
PB
D B
itun
g or
gani
zed
an e
vacu
atio
n dr
ill i
n M
ay 2
014
part
icip
ated
by
disa
ster
rel
ated
age
ncie
s in
Bit
ung
(e.g
. age
ncy
for
heal
th, s
ocia
l, an
d pu
blic
wor
ks),
and
oth
er c
omm
unit
y ba
sed
orga
niza
tion
s (e
.g. T
AG
AN
A, S
IBA
T),
and
PM
I 3)
BP
BD
Man
ado
cond
ucte
d an
eva
cuat
ion
dril
l in
Janu
ary
2015
bas
ed o
n ex
peri
ence
of
the
two
prec
edin
g C
PX
(S
ep 2
013
and
Oct
201
4)
4)B
PB
D S
itar
o al
loca
ted
IDR
20
mil
lion
(20
14)
and
IDR
40
mil
lion
(20
15)
to p
rom
ote
CB
DR
M a
t D
esa
Tata
hade
ng (
2014
), D
esa
Dom
paso
and
Des
a R
anot
ana
(201
5)
5)
BP
BD
Sit
aro
has
esta
blis
hed
“Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t For
um”
to r
evis
e th
e R
DM
P in
clud
ing
mem
bers
fro
m v
illa
ges.
6)
B
PB
D S
itar
o w
as in
volv
ed in
the
com
mun
ity
evac
uati
on d
rill
org
aniz
ed b
y th
e R
ed C
ross
loca
l of
fice
in O
ctob
er 2
014
(the
rel
atio
nshi
p be
twee
n B
PBD
Sit
aro
and
the
Red
Cro
ss lo
cal o
ffic
e ha
d be
en s
tren
gthe
ned
due
to th
e P
roje
ct)
Vil
lage
-
At K
elur
ahan
Beb
ali (
one
of th
e tw
o pi
lot v
illa
ges)
Sit
aro,
con
side
rati
on o
n re
visi
ng v
olca
no
haza
rd m
ap f
or s
etti
ng u
p si
gn b
oard
s is
ong
oing
in 2
015
Not
e) th
e nu
mbe
r is
as
man
y as
iden
tifi
ed d
urin
g th
e te
rmin
al e
valu
atio
n th
roug
h in
terv
iew
and
que
stio
nnai
re. N
ot a
ll K
ab/K
ota
wer
e su
rvey
ed.
Par
tial
ly
Ach
ieve
d (a
ctiv
itie
s in
N
TB
sti
ll
ongo
ing)
Out
puts
1.
The
cap
acit
y fo
r th
e re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
BP
BD
s to
acc
umul
ate
disa
ster
da
ta/i
nfor
mat
ion
whi
ch a
re
fund
amen
tal f
or d
isas
ter
risk
m
anag
emen
t and
impr
ove
1-
1.A
ccum
ulat
ion
of d
isas
ter
data
it
ems
(New
ly a
ccum
ulat
ed
sinc
e th
ere
are
no e
xist
ing
data
) in
the
targ
et a
rea.
(1st T
arge
t are
a of
SU
LU
T)
・
Tech
nica
l gui
delin
e fo
r co
llec
ting
and
sto
ring
dis
aste
r da
ta/i
nfor
mat
ion
(ver
1.0)
[D
raft
- S
epte
mbe
r 20
13]
was
pre
pare
d ba
sed
on
acti
viti
es in
SU
LU
T in
acc
orda
nce
wit
h th
e fo
llow
ing:
1)
Per
ka N
o. 8
/201
1 (S
tand
ardi
zatio
n of
Dis
aste
r D
ata)
2)
Per
ka N
o. 7
/201
2 (G
uide
line
on
data
man
agem
ent a
nd D
isas
ter
Info
rmat
ion)
・
The
tech
nica
l gui
deli
ne p
rovi
des
5 da
ta f
orm
ats
whi
ch w
ere
deve
lope
d by
the
Pro
ject
.
Ach
ieve
d
A-22
accu
racy
of
such
da
ta/i
nfor
mat
ion
in th
e ta
rget
ar
ea is
enh
ance
d.
Pha
se
Per
ka N
o. 8
/201
1 D
ata
For
mat
dev
elop
ed b
y th
e P
roje
ct
Pre
Dis
aste
r ・
Reg
iona
l Pro
file
For
m
and
Ava
ilab
ilit
y of
R
esou
rce
For
m
・ P
re D
isas
ter
Dat
a: A
. Kab
upat
en/K
ota
Pro
file
・
Pre
Dis
aste
r D
ata:
B. R
esou
rces
Ava
ilab
ilit
y –
Log
isti
c ・
Init
ial R
ecor
d of
Dis
aste
r In
cide
nt I
nfor
mat
ion
(dai
ly r
epor
t)
Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e・
The
For
m o
f D
isas
ter
Eve
nt
・E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
Dat
a: D
isas
ter
Inci
dent
For
m
・S
urve
y in
Dis
aste
r L
ocat
ion
For
m
Pos
t Dis
aste
r ・
For
m o
f R
ehab
ilit
atio
n an
d R
econ
stru
ctio
n
-
・T
he a
ctiv
ity
for
deve
lopi
ng th
e te
chni
cal g
uide
line
was
com
plet
ed. R
evis
ion
of th
e gu
idel
ine
is n
ot in
clud
ed in
the
2nd h
alf
of th
e P
roje
ct p
erio
d.
1-2.
Impr
ovem
ent o
f di
sast
er d
ata
qual
ity
(By
foll
owin
g th
e fo
rmat
, dat
a ar
e su
ffic
ient
ly
accu
mul
ated
) in
the
targ
et a
rea.
・ T
he d
ata
form
at w
as u
sed
at a
ctua
l dis
aste
r ev
ents
in S
UL
UT
suc
h as
flo
od in
Feb
ruar
y 20
13 a
nd J
anua
ry 2
014
in M
anad
o.
BP
BD
SU
LU
T in
dica
ted
that
out
put 1
(th
e da
ta f
orm
at a
nd te
chni
cal g
uide
line
) w
ere
part
icul
arly
use
ful.
・
BN
PB
issu
e a
peri
odic
al m
agaz
ine
“GE
MA
” B
NP
B th
ree
tim
es a
yea
r. D
ata
coll
ecte
d w
ith
the
form
at c
ould
be
incl
uded
in th
e m
agaz
ine.
Ach
ieve
d
2. T
he c
apac
ity
for
crea
tion
of
Haz
ard
and
risk
map
s at
re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
leve
l in
the
targ
et a
rea
is
enha
nced
.
2-1.
Num
ber
of th
e re
genc
ies/
mun
icip
alit
ies
whe
re
haza
rd a
nd r
isk
map
s at
re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
leve
l are
cr
eate
d in
the
targ
et a
rea.
(1st T
arge
t are
a of
SU
LU
T)
・ 1
5 K
ab/K
ota
in S
UL
UT
are
fur
nish
ed w
ith
haza
rd m
aps,
whi
ch w
ere
com
plet
ed b
y 17
Dec
201
3 (5
th W
/S f
or O
utpu
t 2),
on
nine
di
sast
ers
(Flo
od, F
lash
floo
d, L
ands
lide
, Ext
rem
e W
eath
er, D
raug
ht, F
ores
t Fir
e, E
arth
quak
e, T
suna
mi,
and
Vol
cani
c E
rupt
ion)
. V
ulne
rabi
lity
map
s an
d ri
sk m
aps
wer
e al
so c
reat
ed.
・ C
ount
erpa
rt o
f K
ab/K
ota
BP
BD
s w
ere
enga
ged
in c
olle
ctin
g hi
stor
ical
rec
ords
of
disa
ster
eve
nts
and
its
map
ping
man
uall
y (f
or
haza
rd m
ap)
as w
ell a
s co
llet
ing
stat
isti
cal d
ata
and
com
pili
ng th
em a
s da
taba
se (
for
vuln
erab
ilit
y m
ap).
The
Pro
ject
con
duct
ed
digi
tiza
tion
of
colle
cted
dat
a on
GIS
at t
he G
IS c
orne
r es
tabl
ishe
d at
the
prov
inci
al B
PB
D.
・ R
egar
ding
cap
acit
y m
ap, F
GD
for
cap
acit
y as
sess
men
t was
car
ried
out
at o
nly
1 K
abup
aten
(on
11
Feb
201
4 in
Kab
. Bol
aang
M
ongo
ndow
Sou
th).
As
for
othe
r K
ab/K
ota,
the
Pro
ject
con
duct
ed s
impl
ifie
d ca
paci
ty a
sses
smen
ts b
ecau
se F
GD
did
n’t t
ake
plac
e du
e to
mai
nly
thei
r bu
dget
con
stra
int.
・ D
isas
ter
Ris
k A
sses
smen
t Mat
rix
for
each
Kab
/Kot
a (r
isk
anal
yzed
at D
esa
leve
l for
haz
ard
and
vuln
erab
ilit
y) w
as a
lso
deve
lope
d in
Jan
-Feb
201
4 w
ith
prac
tica
l pro
cedu
res
prep
ared
by
the
Pro
ject
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith
Per
ka N
o. 2
/201
2 (G
ener
al G
uide
line
on
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Ass
essm
ent f
or D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lann
ing)
. The
mat
rix
was
incl
uded
in R
DM
P.
・
GIS
equ
ipm
ent (
soft
war
e A
rc G
IS, c
ompu
ter,
A0-
size
plo
tter
) at
the
GIS
cor
ner
was
han
ded
over
to th
e pr
ovin
cial
BP
BD
, dat
ed
on 2
8 M
ar 2
014.
・
GIS
tech
nica
l tra
inin
g on
cre
atin
g m
aps
wit
h G
IS s
oftw
are
was
con
duct
ed tw
ice
as f
ollo
ws
by th
e P
roje
ct. T
echn
ical
tran
sfer
als
o to
ok p
lace
wit
h on
-the
-job
trai
ning
.
M
eeti
ng
Dat
e P
arti
cipa
nts
1st W
/S
27 M
ay 2
013
3 of
fice
rs f
rom
Pro
vinc
ial B
PB
D N
orth
Sul
awes
i
2 of
fice
rs f
rom
BP
BD
Min
ahas
a N
orth
1
from
BP
BD
Min
ahas
a S
outh
1
from
BP
BD
Min
ahas
a
2nd W
/S
16 J
une
2013
5
offi
cers
fro
m P
rovi
ncia
l BP
BD
Nor
th S
ulaw
esi
(2nd
Tar
get a
rea
of N
TB
) ・
10 K
ab/K
ota
in N
TB
are
exp
ecte
d to
hav
e ha
zard
and
ris
k m
aps
thro
ugh
acti
viti
es a
s fo
llow
s.
M
eeti
ng
Dat
e an
d V
enue
M
ain
agen
da
Kic
k-of
f W
/S19
Jun
e 20
14 (
mor
ning
) at
Kot
a M
atar
am
Two
C/P
of
BN
PB
att
ende
d.
(Q
uest
ionn
aire
for
pro
vinc
ial a
nd K
ab/K
ota
BP
BD
cap
acit
y as
sess
men
t was
dis
trib
uted
.)
1st W
/S
19 J
une
2014
(ev
enin
g) a
nd 2
0 Ju
ne 2
014
(who
le d
ay)
R
eque
stin
g to
dev
elop
dis
aste
r hi
stor
y m
aps
(fiv
e di
sast
ers)
and
dis
cuss
dis
aste
r ri
sk a
nd c
apac
ity
asse
ssm
ent a
t vil
lage
leve
l.
2nd W
/S
11 S
ep 2
014
in K
ota
Mat
aram
, Lom
bok
B
asic
GIS
trai
ning
for
dig
itiz
ing
data
Par
tial
ly
Ach
ieve
d (a
ctiv
itie
s in
N
TB
sti
ll
ongo
ing)
A-23
(12-
16 S
ep w
ith
foll
ow-u
p W
/S)
18
Sep
201
4 in
Kot
a B
ima,
Sum
baw
a (1
9-20
Sep
wit
h fo
llow
-up
W/S
)
FG
D f
or d
isas
ter
risk
and
cap
acit
y as
sess
men
t at K
ab/K
ota
Add
itio
nal W
/S2
Oct
201
4 G
IS T
echn
ical
W/S
3rd
W/S
18
Nov
2014
in K
ota
Mat
aram
, Lom
bok
20 N
ov 2
014
in K
ab. B
ima,
Sum
baw
a
4th W
/S
14 J
an 2
015
in K
ota
Mat
aram
, Lom
bok
21 J
an 2
015
in K
ab. B
ima,
Sum
baw
a F
ollo
w-u
p V
isit
ing
each
kab
/kot
a on
7-2
4 A
pril
201
5 F
inal
izin
g ri
sk a
sses
smen
t mat
rix
and
draf
t map
s (h
azar
d,
vuln
erab
ilit
y, r
isk)
(5th W
/S)
(Sch
edul
ed in
Jun
e 20
15)
To f
urth
er d
evel
op h
azar
d m
aps
(e.g
. inc
ludi
ng e
valu
atio
n ro
utes
, etc
.)
・
Bas
ic a
nd o
ther
info
rmat
ion
on h
azar
d, v
ulne
rabi
lity
, cap
acit
y, a
nd d
isas
ter
risk
wer
e co
llat
ed (
Kab
/Kot
a B
PB
D p
repa
red
hist
oric
al d
isas
ter
map
s m
anua
lly)
and
map
s w
ere
alm
ost c
ompl
eted
at t
he G
IS c
orne
r es
tabl
ishe
d in
the
NT
B p
rovi
ncia
l BP
BD
(d
igit
izin
g th
e da
ta)
・
As
for
the
capa
city
ass
essm
ent,
FG
D f
or d
isas
ter
risk
and
cap
acit
y as
sess
men
t at K
ab/K
ota
leve
l wer
e co
nduc
ted
at a
ll th
e 10
B
PB
D in
Sep
tem
ber
2014
by
a lo
cal N
GO
con
trac
ted
by th
e P
roje
ct. T
he r
esul
t (ea
ch K
ab/K
ota
wer
e gi
ven
1 sc
ore)
was
rep
orte
d to
the
Pro
ject
. FD
G a
t Des
a le
vel f
or c
apac
ity
asse
ssm
ent i
s ex
pect
ed to
be
unde
rtak
en b
y ea
ch B
PB
D.
・ D
isas
ter
Ris
k A
sses
smen
t Mat
rix
for
each
Kab
/Kot
a w
ill b
e pr
epar
ed b
y ea
ch B
PB
D to
be
incl
uded
in th
e R
DM
P.
(Ta
ngib
le o
utpu
ts)
1)
Tec
hnic
al G
uide
line
for
Cre
atio
n of
Haz
ard
Map
for
Reg
enci
es/M
unic
ipal
itie
s (V
er. 2
) S
ep 2
013.
2)
Haz
ard
Map
, Vul
nera
bili
ty M
ap, C
apac
ity
Map
, Dis
aste
r R
isk
Map
of
all t
he 1
5 K
ota/
Kab
upat
en in
SU
LU
T.
3) H
azar
d M
ap, V
ulne
rabi
lity
Map
, Cap
acit
y M
ap, D
isas
ter
Ris
k M
ap o
f al
l the
10
Kot
a/K
abup
aten
in N
TB
(D
raft
)
・ H
azar
d m
aps
of K
ab/K
ota
are
conf
irm
ed a
s ve
ry u
sefu
l by
BP
BD
SU
LU
T a
s th
ey a
re th
e fi
rst o
ffic
ial m
ap o
f it
s ki
nd. T
he m
aps
wer
e sh
ared
wit
h ot
her
agen
cies
suc
h as
PU
for
spa
tial
pla
nnin
g as
all
Kab
/Kot
a ar
e re
quir
ed to
pre
pare
a s
pati
al p
lan.
・In
put t
owar
d th
e re
visi
on o
f P
erka
No.
2/2
012
(Gen
eral
Gui
deli
ne o
n D
isas
ter
Ris
k A
sses
smen
t for
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t P
lann
ing)
con
tinu
es.
3. T
he c
apac
ity
for
form
ulat
ion
of R
egio
nal d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent p
lans
for
re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
in th
e ta
rget
are
a is
enh
ance
d.
3-1.
Num
ber
of th
e re
genc
ies/
mun
icip
alit
ies
whe
re
regi
onal
dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t pl
ans
are
form
ulat
ed a
t re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
leve
l in
the
targ
et a
rea.
(1st T
arge
t are
a of
SU
LU
T)
・14
Kab
/Kot
a ar
e fu
rnis
hed
wit
h R
DM
Ps
form
ulat
ed in
the
Pro
ject
as
of A
pril
201
5 K
abup
aten
/Kot
a F
orm
ulat
ion
Sig
natu
re (
for
legi
slat
ion)
B
PB
D D
irec
tor
May
or
1 K
ota
Man
ado
Com
plet
ed (
deve
lope
d as
the
sam
ple
RD
MP
)
Aug
201
4 ○
2 K
ota
Tom
ohon
C
ompl
eted
O
ct 2
014
3
Kot
a B
itun
g C
ompl
eted
F
eb 2
014
○
4 K
ota
Kot
amob
agu
Com
plet
ed
Mar
201
4
5 K
ab. M
inah
asa
in th
e B
NP
B p
roje
ct b
ased
on
Per
ka N
o.4/
2008
6
Kab
. Min
ahas
a N
orth
C
ompl
eted
M
ar 2
014
○
7 K
ab. M
inah
asa
Sou
th
Com
plet
ed
Oct
201
4
8 K
ab. M
inah
asa
Sou
thea
st
Com
plet
ed
Aug
201
4 ○
9
Kab
. Bol
aang
Mon
gond
owC
ompl
eted
O
ct 2
014
10
Kab
. Bol
Mon
Nor
th
Com
plet
ed
Oct
201
4 ○
11
K
ab. B
ol M
on S
outh
C
ompl
eted
N
ov 2
014
○
12K
ab. B
ol M
on E
ast
Com
plet
ed
Oct
201
4 ○
13
Kab
. Tal
aud
(isl
ands
) C
ompl
eted
M
ar 2
014
14
Kab
. San
gihe
(is
land
s)
Com
plet
ed
Nov
201
4 ○
15
Kab
. Sit
aro
(Isl
ands
) C
ompl
eted
M
ar 2
015
○
・T
he 1
4 R
DM
Ps
abov
e w
ere
prod
uced
thro
ugh
a se
ries
of
wor
ksho
p al
ong
wit
h th
e fo
llow
ing
docu
men
ts.
Par
tial
ly
Ach
ieve
d (a
ctiv
itie
s in
N
TB
sti
ll
ongo
ing)
A-24
1) T
echn
ical
Gui
deli
ne o
f R
DM
P fo
r K
abup
aten
/Kot
a (V
er.1
.5),
Aug
ust 2
014.
Thi
s w
ill b
e fi
nali
zed
in li
ne w
ith
the
foll
owin
g tw
o do
cum
ents
that
are
cur
rent
ly u
nder
rev
isio
n
・P
erka
No.
4/20
08 (
The
Gui
deli
ne f
or F
orm
ulat
ion
of th
e D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan)
・
Nat
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n (2
010-
2014
) cu
rren
tly
bein
g re
vise
d fo
r th
e ne
xt 5
yea
rs (
2015
-201
9)
2) R
DM
P fo
rmul
atio
n su
ppor
t app
lica
tion
(V
er.1
.7)
Exc
el
3) S
ampl
e R
DM
P -
Dis
aste
r P
lan
of M
anad
o C
ity
(Ver
.0.5
) S
ep 2
013
M
eeti
ng
Dat
e A
gend
a K
ick-
Off
W/S
10
Oct
201
2 F
orm
ulat
ion
of R
DM
P: C
hapt
er 1
Gen
eral
, (In
trod
ucti
on a
nd r
egio
nal o
verv
iew
) pa
rtic
ipat
ed b
y B
NP
B.
2nd W
/S
14 D
ec 2
012
For
mul
atio
n of
RD
MP
: Cha
pter
1 G
ener
al, (
Dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t pol
icy,
ac
tivi
ties
for
dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t)
3rd W
/S
14 F
eb 2
013
For
mul
atio
n of
RD
MP
: Cha
pter
2 D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent A
ctiv
ity
(All
ocat
ion
of
task
and
res
ourc
es)
4th W
/S
30 M
ay 2
013
For
mul
atio
n of
RD
MP
: Cha
pter
3 M
onit
orin
g, e
valu
atio
n an
d re
port
ing
5th W
/S
5 S
ep 2
013
For
mul
atio
n of
RD
MP
: Ann
ex (
Act
ion
Pla
n)
6th W
/S
18 D
ec 2
013
Exp
lana
tion
and
exe
rcis
e on
act
ion
plan
W
rap-
up W
/S
27 M
ar 2
014
Tota
l 200
par
tici
pant
s fr
om B
NP
B, B
PB
D, p
rovi
ncia
l, re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
or
gani
zati
ons,
pol
ice,
arm
y, u
nive
rsit
ies,
and
NG
Os.
F
ollo
w-u
p 10
-24
May
201
4 2
loca
l con
sult
ant v
isit
ed M
anad
o, T
omoh
on, S
itar
o, S
angi
he, M
inah
asa
Sou
th,
Min
ahas
a S
outh
east
28
Sep
- 4
Oct
20
14
2 lo
cal c
onsu
ltan
t vis
ited
Bol
aang
Mon
gond
ow, M
B N
orth
, MB
Sou
th, M
B E
ast.
Tota
l 10
Kab
/Kot
a w
ere
visi
ted
in M
ay a
nd O
ctob
er to
geth
er.
The
oth
er K
ab.K
ota
whi
ch w
ere
not v
isit
had
alr
eady
fin
ishe
d th
e fo
rmul
atio
n of
R
DM
P by
the
tim
e.
(2nd
Tar
get a
rea
of N
TB
) ・
10 K
ab/K
ota
are
expe
cted
to b
e fu
rnis
hed
wit
h R
DM
Ps
thro
ugh
the
Pro
ject
in th
e fo
llow
ing
acti
viti
es.
M
eeti
ng
D
ate,
Age
nda
Pre
p. m
eeti
ng7
Apr
201
4 In
trod
ucti
on o
f th
e P
roje
ct to
NT
B
Kic
k-of
f W
/S19
Jun
e 20
14 (
mor
ning
) Tw
o C
/P f
rom
BN
PB
att
ende
d.
1st W
/S
19 J
une
2014
(af
tern
oon)
N
eces
sity
of
RD
MP
and
Cha
.1
Cas
e of
SU
LU
T b
y B
PB
D K
ota
Bit
ung
(Mr.
Alf
indo
)2nd
W/S
23
Oct
201
4 at
Pro
vinc
ial B
PB
D, L
ombo
k 27
Oct
201
4 at
the
Kab
. Sum
baw
a W
est B
PB
D
Exp
lana
tion
and
pra
ctic
e fo
r C
ha.2
(ac
tivi
ties
an
d ro
le o
f re
late
d or
gani
zati
ons)
3rd
W/S
14
Jan
201
5 at
Pro
vinc
ial B
PB
D in
Kot
a M
atar
am,
22 J
an 2
015
at R
egen
cy B
PB
D in
Kab
. Bim
a P
ract
icin
g th
e us
e of
“Te
chni
cal G
uide
line
A
ppli
cati
on”
4th
W/S
16
Apr
201
5, L
ombo
k H
eld
at B
PB
D T
NB
par
tici
pate
d by
8 K
ab/K
ota
for
Cha
.3
(Wra
p-up
) (s
ched
uled
in S
epte
mbe
r 20
15)
Fin
aliz
atio
n
・C
urre
nt s
tatu
s of
RD
MP
form
ulat
ion
at e
ach
Kab
/Kot
a.
Kab
upat
en/K
ota
Exi
sten
ce o
f R
DM
P
Pro
gres
s as
of A
pril
201
5 1
Lom
bok
Isla
nd
Kot
a M
atar
am
○ b
y B
NP
B P
roje
ctD
ata
entr
y fo
r ap
plic
atio
n (C
ha.2
) co
mpl
eted
2
Kab
. Lom
bok
Nor
th○
by
Loc
al N
GO
D
ata
entr
y fo
r ap
plic
atio
n (C
ha.2
) co
mpl
eted
3
Kab
. Lom
bok
Wes
t ○
by
BN
PB
Pro
ject
Dat
a en
try
of C
ha.2
ong
oing
4
Kab
. Lom
bok
Cen
tral
- C
ha.1
com
plet
ed
5 K
ab. L
ombo
k E
ast
○ b
y L
ocal
NG
O
Dat
a en
try
for
appl
icat
ion
(Cha
.2)
com
plet
ed
6 S
umba
wa
Isla
nd
Kot
a B
ima
○ b
y L
ocal
NG
O
Dat
a en
try
for
appl
icat
ion
(Cha
.2)
com
plet
ed
Con
sult
atio
n w
ith
rela
ted
orga
niza
tion
s on
goin
g
7 K
ab. B
ima
○ b
y B
NP
B P
roje
ctC
ompl
eted
8
Kab
. Dom
pu
- C
ha.1
bei
ng d
evel
oped
A-25
9 K
ab. S
umba
wa
- D
ata
entr
y fo
r ap
plic
atio
n (C
ha.2
) co
mpl
eted
10
Kab
. Sum
baw
a W
est
- D
ata
entr
y fo
r ap
plic
atio
n (C
ha.2
) co
mpl
eted
(A
ctiv
ity
on S
OP
)
・T
he a
ctiv
ity
for
deve
lopi
ng T
echn
ical
Gui
deli
ne f
or F
orm
ulat
ion
of S
OP
was
com
plet
ed in
Mar
ch 2
014
in S
UL
UT.
Rev
isio
n of
the
guid
elin
e is
not
incl
uded
in th
e 2nd
hal
f of
the
Pro
ject
per
iod.
・
SO
P of
Sit
aro
for
Fac
ing
Dis
aste
r V
olca
no K
aran
geta
ng w
as d
evel
oped
and
fin
aliz
ed in
the
Pro
ject
. ・
Kot
a To
moh
on a
lrea
dy h
ad S
OP
befo
re th
e P
roje
ct, a
nd h
ad it
rev
ised
in S
epte
mbe
r 20
14 b
y pr
epar
ing
and
incl
udin
g w
orki
ng
proc
edur
es e
ncou
rage
d an
d su
ppor
ted
by th
e P
roje
ct.
・
Kot
a B
itun
g al
so h
ad S
OP
(tar
geti
ng f
lood
), w
hich
was
fin
aliz
ed in
Sep
201
4.
4. T
he c
apac
ity
for
cond
ucti
ng
Dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t ex
erci
ses
at th
e re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
in th
e ta
rget
are
a is
enh
ance
d.
4-1.
Num
ber
of d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent e
xerc
ises
im
plem
ente
d in
the
targ
et a
rea.
(1st
Tar
get a
rea
of S
UL
UT)
・
Tota
l 15
disa
ster
man
agem
ent e
xerc
ises
(1
DIG
, 13
TT
X, 1
CP
X)
wer
e im
plem
ente
d in
the
Pro
ject
.
M
eeti
ng
Dat
e A
gend
a 1)
DIG
10
Oct
201
2, M
anad
o
Dis
aste
r Im
agin
atio
n G
ame
at th
e jo
int k
ick-
off
wor
ksho
p w
ith
the
Out
put 3
. 2)
TT
X
18 O
ct –
6 D
ec 2
012
in 1
3 K
ab/K
ota
Tabl
e To
p E
xerc
ise
cond
ucte
d at
13
Kab
/Kot
a vi
site
d by
the
Pro
ject
team
. -
Wor
ksho
p fo
r S
OP
For
mul
atio
n (1
1-12
Jun
201
3, M
anad
o)
(2 d
ay w
orks
hop
for
the
prep
arat
ion
of C
PX
sch
edul
ed in
Sep
20
13.)
-
Wor
ksho
p fo
r C
PX
pr
epar
atio
n (4
Sep
201
3, B
itun
g)
(Exp
lana
tion
on
the
role
of
“Pla
yer”
in C
PX
sch
edul
ed in
Sep
20
13.)
3)
CP
X
18 S
ep 2
013
in M
anad
o an
d si
mul
tane
ousl
y in
Sit
aro
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Dri
ll (
Com
man
d P
ost E
xerc
ise)
wit
h th
e pa
rtic
ipat
ion
of B
NP
B, P
rovi
ncia
l BP
BD
, M
anad
o/B
itun
g/S
itaro
BP
BD
・
The
act
ivit
y fo
r de
velo
ping
Tec
hnic
al g
uide
line
for
dis
aste
r re
lief
exe
rcis
e w
as c
ompl
eted
in M
arch
201
4 in
SU
LU
T. R
evis
ion
of
the
guid
elin
e is
not
incl
uded
in th
e 2nd
hal
f of
the
Pro
ject
per
iod.
(2
nd T
arge
t are
a of
NT
B)
・D
isas
ter
man
agem
ent d
rill
wil
l not
be
cond
ucte
d in
the
NT
B.
Ach
ieve
d
4-2.
Num
ber
of a
ctiv
itie
s on
C
BD
RM
in th
e ta
rget
are
a.
(1st T
arge
t are
a of
SU
LU
T)
・
To
tal 1
0 C
BD
RM
act
ivit
ies
(1 le
ader
trai
ning
, 3 c
omm
unit
y W
S, 1
Eva
luat
ion
dril
l) w
ere
cond
ucte
d at
the
two
pilo
t vil
lage
s.
1) D
esa
Moy
ag, K
otam
obag
u 2)
Kel
urah
an B
ebal
i, S
itar
o
M
eeti
ng
Dat
e A
gend
a K
otam
obag
u S
itar
o -
Kic
k-of
f W
orks
hop
10
Oct
201
2 In
trod
ucti
on to
CB
DR
M a
ctiv
itie
s at
Man
ado
- 1s
t Wor
ksho
p 11
-12
Oct
201
2 E
nhan
cem
ent o
f C
BD
RM
in N
orth
Sul
awes
i B
NP
B g
ave
lect
ure
on C
BD
RM
1)
C
BD
RM
Tra
inin
g fo
r C
omm
unit
y L
eade
rs
21-2
2 F
eb 2
013
26-2
7 F
eb 2
013
Tra
inin
g fo
r co
mm
unit
y le
ader
s in
dis
aste
r re
sili
ent
prog
ram
2)
1st
Com
mun
ity
Wor
ksho
p
24-2
5 A
pr 2
013
17-1
8 A
pr 2
013
Tow
ards
Dis
aste
r R
esil
ient
Vil
lage
in K
abup
aten
S
itar
o 3)
2nd
Com
mun
ity
W/S
(i
nter
nal)
22
Jul
y 20
13
16 J
uly
2013
4)
3rd C
omm
unit
y W
orks
hop
29 A
ug 2
013
5 S
ep 2
013
Pre
para
tion
of
the
CP
X s
ched
ule
on 1
8 S
ep 2
013.
5)
Eva
cuat
ion
Dri
ll
10 S
ep 2
013
18 S
ep 2
013
-
Fol
low
-up
visi
t O
ct-N
ov 2
013
Fin
aliz
atio
n of
DM
Pla
n an
d H
azar
d M
ao
・ A
ctiv
itie
s w
ere
capt
ured
in S
umm
ary
Rep
ort o
f JI
CA
Tra
inin
g P
rogr
am f
or E
nhan
cem
ent o
f C
BD
RM
Act
ivit
ies
in N
orth
Sul
awes
i (1
0-12
Oct
201
2).
・
“D
isas
ter
Res
ilie
nt V
illa
ge”
Pro
gram
– A
s a
Goo
d P
ract
ice
Mod
el –
(V
er.1
.0)
Mar
201
4 w
as d
evel
oped
, whi
ch in
clud
es V
illa
ge
Par
tial
ly
Ach
ieve
d (a
ctiv
itie
s in
N
TB
sti
ll
ongo
ing)
A-26
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
ns a
nd c
omm
unit
y ha
zard
map
s of
the
two
pilo
t vil
lage
(D
esa
Moy
ag, K
elur
ahan
Beb
ali)
.
(2
nd T
arge
t are
a of
NT
B)
・To
tal 6
CB
DR
M a
ctiv
itie
s (1
lead
er tr
aini
ng, 4
com
mun
ity
W/S
, and
1 e
valu
atio
n dr
ill)
wer
e co
nduc
ted
at o
ne p
ilot
vil
lage
.
1) D
esa
Kut
a, K
ab. L
ombo
k C
entr
al
M
eeti
ng
D
ate,
Age
nda
- K
ick-
off
W/S
19
Jun
e 20
14 (
mor
ning
) O
vera
ll P
roje
ct in
trod
ucti
on
- In
trod
ucto
ry
trai
ning
19
Jun
e 20
14 (
afte
rnoo
n) a
nd
20 J
une
2014
(w
hole
day
)
Tra
inin
g fo
r K
ab/K
ota
BP
BD
sta
ff in
cha
rge
of C
BD
RM
on
the
guid
elin
e fo
r D
isas
ter
Res
ilie
nt C
omm
unit
y an
d ts
unam
i, co
mm
unit
y ri
sk a
sses
smen
t, co
mm
unit
y ea
rly
war
ning
sy
stem
, haz
ard
map
, DR
MP
and
acti
on p
lan
at v
illa
ge le
vel.
1)
C
omm
unit
y L
eade
r W
/S
29-3
0 O
ct 2
014
at K
ab.
Lom
bok
Cen
tral
W
/S f
or le
ader
s fr
om 1
2 vi
llag
es f
rom
Lom
bok
Cen
tral
. C/P
fr
om B
NP
B g
ave
lect
ure
on D
isas
ter
Res
ilie
nt C
omm
unit
y 2)
1st
Com
mun
ity
W/S
10
-11
Nov
201
4, D
esa
Kut
a fa
cili
tate
d an
d pa
rtly
lect
ured
by
the
BP
BD
Lom
bok
Cen
tral
.
3)
CB
DR
M T
rain
ers’
tr
aini
ng
11 D
ec 2
014,
Kot
a M
atar
am,
23
Dec
201
4, K
ab.S
umba
wa,
24
Dec
201
4, K
ota
Bim
a,
To d
evel
op 2
2 K
ab/K
ota
BP
BD
sta
ff m
embe
rs a
s fa
cili
tato
rs.
4)
2nd C
omm
unit
y W
/S
19 J
an 2
015,
Des
a K
uta
21 J
an 2
015,
Sum
baw
a P
arti
cipa
ted
by B
PB
D C
/P s
taff
as
obse
rver
s.
C/P
fro
m B
NP
B g
ave
open
ing
rem
arks
and
att
ende
d Q
&A
se
ssio
n.
5)
3rd C
omm
unit
y W
/S
13 A
pril
201
5, D
esa
Kut
a
6)
Eva
cuat
ion
Dri
ll
18 A
pr 2
015
・
Act
ivit
ies
of D
isas
ter
Res
ilie
nt V
illa
ge (
base
d on
BN
PB
Per
ka N
o.1/
2012
) w
ere
unde
rtak
en a
t Kab
. Lom
bok
Nor
th, K
ab.
Lom
bok
Wes
t, an
d ot
her
Kab
/Kot
a in
col
labo
rati
on w
ith
NG
O. A
s fo
r 20
15, i
ts a
ctiv
itie
s ha
ve n
ot b
een
star
ted
as y
et. B
NP
B’s
Te
chni
cal G
uide
line
for
the
Impl
emen
tati
on o
f D
isas
ter
Res
ilie
nt V
illa
ge P
rogr
am f
or 2
015
is e
xpec
ted
to b
e is
sued
in M
ay.
・
D
iscu
ssio
n an
d co
nsul
tati
on f
or s
etti
ng u
p si
gn b
oard
s to
indi
cate
eva
cuat
ion
poin
ts in
cas
e of
tsun
ami (
cons
ider
ing
that
NT
B is
fa
mou
s fo
r si
ghts
eein
g)
(O
ther
act
ivit
ies
on C
BD
RM
) ・
14-1
8 Ju
ly 2
014:
info
rmat
ion
shar
ing
at th
e tr
aini
ng b
y B
NP
B “
disa
ster
res
ilie
nt v
illa
ge”
・
9-11
Oct
201
4: p
arti
cipa
tion
in th
e C
BD
RM
Nat
iona
l Con
fere
nce
as a
res
ourc
e pe
rson
・
18-2
7 S
ep 2
014:
Sup
port
to N
GO
(K
yoto
Uni
vers
ity
Dis
aste
r P
reve
ntio
n S
choo
l) v
isit
ing
scho
ols
in N
TB
5.
Nat
ionw
ide
diss
emin
atio
n ac
tivi
ties
are
impl
emen
ted.
5-
1.Te
chni
cal G
uide
line
for
fo
rmul
atio
n of
RD
MP
is
util
ized
as
refe
renc
e do
cum
ents
of
BN
PB
・ T
echn
ical
Gui
deli
ne o
f R
DM
P fo
r K
abup
aten
/Kot
a (V
er.1
.5),
Aug
ust 2
014
is p
lann
ed to
be
revi
sed
base
d on
the
resu
lts
of
acti
viti
es in
NT
B, t
akin
g in
to c
onsi
dera
tion
of
the
fina
liza
tion
sta
tus
of th
e fo
llow
ing
two
docu
men
ts.
1)
(D
raft
) N
atio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan
(201
5-20
19)
2) P
erka
BN
PB
4-2
008
(Gui
deli
ne o
n th
e F
orm
ulat
ion
of th
e D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan)
cur
rent
ly u
nder
rev
isio
n ・
The
tech
nica
l gui
deli
ne is
exp
ecte
d to
be
auth
oriz
ed/a
ppro
ved
by B
NP
B u
pon
its
com
plet
ion.
The
gui
deli
ne c
an b
e di
stri
bute
d in
th
e A
nnua
l BN
PB
gen
eral
mee
ting
in O
ctob
er 2
015
(and
trai
ning
can
als
o be
con
side
red.
)
Exp
ecte
d to
be
ach
ieve
d (f
inal
izat
ion
of th
e gu
idel
ine
is
nece
ssar
y)
5-2.
Num
ber
of e
vent
s to
sup
port
na
tion
wid
e di
ssem
inat
ion
acti
viti
es o
n fo
rmul
atio
n of
R
DM
P
・3e
vent
s w
ere
unde
rtak
en f
or d
isse
min
atio
n of
RD
MP
form
ulat
ion
met
hod.
E
vent
s D
ate
Age
nda
1)P
rese
ntat
ion
at s
ide
even
ts o
f di
sast
er m
anag
emen
t dri
ll
19 M
ar 2
014
・ L
arge
-sca
le d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent d
rill
at P
adan
g in
S
umat
era
Bar
at
2)P
rese
ntat
ion
and
pane
l dis
cuss
ion
at A
nnua
l BN
PB
gen
eral
mee
ting
(
3 da
ys)
14 O
ct 2
014
・P
rese
ntat
ion
on th
e te
chni
cal g
uide
line
on
RD
MP
wit
h B
AP
PE
NA
S a
nd B
NP
B
・P
anel
dis
cuss
ion
part
icip
ated
by
Kot
a B
itun
g on
goo
d pr
acti
ces
from
the
Pro
ject
3)
Tech
nica
l tra
inin
g fo
r B
NP
B
8 -
9 Ja
n 20
15
・T
rain
ing
for
30 B
NP
B o
ffic
ers
at B
NP
B c
entr
al o
ffic
e on
the
guid
elin
e fo
r fo
rmul
atin
g R
DM
Ps.
Par
tial
ly
Ach
ieve
d (f
inal
izat
ion
of th
e gu
idel
ine
is
nece
ssar
y)
A-27
- P
lann
ed (
Pre
sent
atio
n at
ann
ual
BN
PB
con
fere
nce)
(O
ct 2
015)
(・
Dis
trib
utio
n of
aut
hori
zed
tech
nica
l gui
deli
ne o
n R
DM
Ps
is
unde
r co
nsid
erat
ion)
・
Bes
ides
RD
MP,
the
prep
arat
ion
of e
arth
quak
e ha
zard
map
and
its
nati
onw
ide
diss
emin
atio
n ar
e be
ing
prom
oted
.
Act
ivit
ies
Dat
e D
ate,
Age
nda
1)1st
foc
us g
roup
dis
cuss
ion
on
eart
hqua
ke h
azar
d as
sess
men
t 16
Jun
201
4 at
Ban
dung
,
invi
ting
BN
PB
, BIT
, BM
KG
and
oth
er o
rgan
izat
ions
as
a pa
rt
of n
atio
nwid
e ex
tens
ion
of e
arth
quak
e ha
zard
map
2)
Pre
para
tory
mee
ting
wit
h B
NP
B
24 N
ov 2
014
betw
een
BN
PB
and
JIC
A e
xper
ts f
or d
evel
opin
g E
arth
quak
e ha
zard
map
3)
2nd F
GD
(Te
chni
cal W
S)
on
Ear
thqu
ake
Haz
ard
Ass
essm
ent
13 J
an 2
015
ho
sted
by
BN
PB
invi
ting
rel
ated
age
ncie
s (B
G, B
MK
G, U
GM
, B
PP
T, P
U, I
TB
) (U
N W
orld
Con
fere
nce
on D
isas
ter
Ris
k R
educ
tion
, 201
5 S
enda
i, Ja
pan)
・
ID 5
30: M
ains
trea
min
g D
RR
into
Dev
elop
men
t thr
ough
pra
ctic
al D
M P
lann
ing
at th
e L
ocal
Lev
el: L
esso
ns L
earn
ed f
rom
BN
PB
an
d JI
CA
init
iati
ves
in I
ndon
esia
・
ID 2
51: B
uild
ing
Res
ilie
nce
at th
e L
ocal
Lev
el: E
xper
ienc
es f
rom
Ind
ones
ia a
nd J
apan
(JI
CA
, BN
PB
, AD
RC
)
A-28
Ap
pen
dix
11:
Lis
t of
doc
umen
ts d
evel
oped
in t
he
Pro
ject
Out
put
Doc
umen
t Tit
le
Rel
evan
t Reg
ulat
ions
R
elat
ion
wit
h ex
isti
ng r
egul
atio
ns/d
ocum
ents
O
utpu
t 1
1) T
echn
ical
gui
deli
ne f
or c
olle
ctin
g an
d st
orin
g di
sast
er
data
/inf
orm
atio
n
Dat
a fo
rmat
s
・P
re D
isas
ter
Dat
a: A
. Kab
upat
en/K
ota
Pro
file
・
Pre
Dis
aste
r D
ata:
B. R
esou
rces
Ava
ilab
ilit
y –
Log
isti
c ・
Init
ial R
ecor
d of
Dis
aste
r In
cide
nt I
nfor
mat
ion
(dai
ly
repo
rt)
・
Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e D
ata:
Dis
aste
r In
cide
nt F
orm
・
Sur
vey
in D
isas
ter
Loc
atio
n F
orm
1) P
erka
BN
PB
8-2
011
(Sta
ndar
diza
tion
of D
isas
ter
Dat
a)
2) P
erka
BN
PB
7-2
012
(Gui
deli
ne o
n da
ta m
anag
emen
t and
Dis
aste
r In
form
atio
n)
3) P
erka
BN
PB
13-
2010
(G
uide
line
on
Sea
rch,
Res
cue
& E
vacu
atio
n)
4) T
echn
ical
Gui
deli
ne o
f D
IBI
for A
dmin
istr
atio
n 5)
Tec
hnic
al G
uide
line
of
DIB
I fo
r U
ser
(D
IBI
was
dev
elop
ed in
coo
pera
tion
of
BA
PP
EN
AS
, BN
PB
, MoH
A, U
ND
P an
d D
FID
)
・ P
erka
BN
PB
8-2
011
prov
ides
for
a d
ata
form
at
for
each
of
the
3 ph
ases
(P
re D
isas
ter,
Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e, a
nd P
ost D
isas
ter)
. T
he
Pro
ject
fur
ther
div
ided
the
phas
es in
to f
ive,
thus
ha
ving
pre
pare
d 5
data
for
mat
by
also
taki
ng
into
con
side
rati
on P
erka
BN
PB
13-
2010
.
・ T
he te
chni
cal g
uide
line
is e
xpec
ted
to b
e us
ed a
s a
refe
rent
ial m
ater
ial t
o su
pple
men
t the
Per
ka
BN
PB
8-2
011
mai
nly
for
the
use
at K
ab/K
ota
leve
l.
Out
put 2
2)
Tec
hnic
al G
uide
line
for
Cre
atio
n of
Haz
ard
Map
for
R
egen
cies
/Mun
icip
alit
ies
(Ver
. 2)
Sep
201
3 1)
Per
ka B
NP
B 2
-201
2 (G
ener
al G
uide
line
on
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Ass
essm
ent f
or D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lann
ing)
→ c
urre
ntly
und
er r
evis
ion
2) P
erka
BN
PB
3-2
012
(Gui
deli
ne o
n R
egio
nal C
apac
ity
Ass
essm
ent i
n D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent)
3)
(D
raft
) R
evis
ion
of P
erka
No.
2/2
012
・T
he te
chni
cal g
uide
line
can
be
a re
fere
ntia
l at
tach
men
t to
the
Per
ka B
NP
B 2
-201
2 w
hich
de
scri
bes
the
appr
oach
to d
isas
ter
risk
as
sess
men
t (ha
zard
, vul
nera
bili
ty, c
apac
ity)
.
Out
put 3
3)
Tec
hnic
al G
uide
line
of
Reg
iona
l Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t P
lan
for
Kab
upat
en/K
ota
(Ver
. 1.5
) Aug
201
4 ・
Tech
nica
l sup
port
app
lica
tion
for
for
mul
atin
g R
DM
Ps
(Ver
.1.7
) ・
Exa
mpl
e of
RD
MP
(Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n of
M
anad
o C
ity,
Ver
.0.5
, Sep
201
3)
1) P
erka
BN
PB
4-2
008
(Gui
deli
ne o
n th
e F
orm
ulat
ion
of th
e D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan)
→ c
urre
ntly
und
er r
evis
ion
2) P
erka
BN
PB
3-2
012
(Gui
deli
ne o
n R
egio
nal C
apac
ity
Ass
essm
ent i
n D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent)
3)
TO
R f
or F
orm
ulat
ion
of R
egio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan
in K
abup
aten
/Kot
a in
S
ulaw
esi I
slan
d (F
Y20
12)
prep
ared
by
PN
PB
4)
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n of
Nor
th S
ulaw
esi P
rovi
nce
(201
2-20
16)
5) D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan
of K
abup
aten
Min
ahas
a (2
013-
2017
) fi
nali
zed
in 2
013
6) D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan
of N
TB
Pro
vinc
e (2
012-
2016
)
7) D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan
of K
ota
Mat
aram
(20
14-2
018)
8)
(D
raft
) N
atio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan
(201
5-20
19) →
sti
ll u
nder
for
mul
atio
n
・ T
he te
chni
cal g
uide
line
can
be
an a
n an
nex
to
the
Per
ka B
NP
B 4
-200
8 w
ith
offi
cial
en
dors
men
t/ap
prov
al o
f B
NP
B (
e.g.
sig
natu
re)
・ T
he te
chnc
ial g
uide
line
incl
udes
mor
e de
tail
ed
desc
ript
ions
on
divi
sion
of
resp
onsi
bilit
ies
and
acti
on p
lan
at K
abup
aten
/Kot
a le
vel.
・ R
DM
Ps
deve
lope
d at
Kab
/Kot
a in
SU
LU
T a
nd
NT
B w
ill c
ompl
emen
t the
BN
PB
pro
ject
that
ai
ms
at p
repa
ring
dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t pla
ns a
t al
l Kob
utat
en/K
ota
in I
ndon
esia
.
4) T
echn
ical
Gui
deli
ne f
or F
orm
ulat
ion
of S
OP
・
SO
P K
abup
aten
Kep
ulau
an S
itar
o fo
r F
acin
g D
isas
ter
Vol
cano
Kar
ange
tang
・
SO
P K
ota
Tom
ohon
・
SO
P K
ota
Bit
ung
1) P
erka
BN
PB
9-2
008
(SO
P fo
r th
e Q
uick
Res
pons
e Te
am)
2) P
erka
BN
PB
10-
2008
(G
uide
line
on
Dis
aste
r E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
Com
man
d)
3) P
erka
BN
PB
12-
2010
(G
uide
line
on
Em
erge
ncy
Rel
ief
Sup
port
Mec
hani
sm)
4) P
erka
BN
PB
13-
2010
(G
uide
line
on
Sea
rch,
Res
cue
& E
vacu
atio
n)
5) P
erka
BN
PB
14-
2010
(E
stab
lish
men
t of
Dis
aste
r E
mer
genc
y C
omm
and
Pos
t)
6) P
erka
BN
PB
18-
2010
(D
istr
ibut
ion
of L
ogis
tics
& E
quip
men
t)
7) P
erka
BN
PB
24-
2010
(F
orm
ulat
ion
of O
pera
tion
al P
lan
for
Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e)
・C
urre
nt B
NP
B r
egul
atio
ns m
ay n
ot b
e co
mbi
ned
to b
e a
com
preh
ensi
ve d
ocum
ent.
Als
o, c
onte
nts
for
nati
onal
and
loca
l age
ncie
s ar
e m
ixed
.
・T
he te
chni
cal g
uide
line
del
inea
tes
thes
e co
nten
ts
and
focu
ses
on S
OP
at th
e K
abup
aten
/Kot
a le
vel.
Out
put 4
5)
Tec
hnic
al G
uide
line
for
Dis
aste
r R
elie
f E
xerc
ise
・T
TX
(Ta
ble
Top
Exe
rcis
e) a
nd C
PX
(C
omm
and
Pos
t E
xerc
ise)
man
ual
1) (
Dra
ft)
Per
ka B
NP
B ○
-201
2 (G
uide
line
for
Im
plem
enta
tion
of
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t E
xerc
ise)
→ s
till
und
er f
orm
ulat
ion
・T
he P
erka
is
stil
l a
draf
t an
d ha
s no
t be
en i
ssue
d as
of A
pril
201
5.
6) A
ctiv
itie
s fo
r “D
isas
ter
Res
ilie
nt V
illa
ge”
Pro
gram
– A
s a
Goo
d P
ract
ice
Mod
el –
(V
er.1
.0)
Mar
201
4 ・
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n D
esa
Moy
ag
・D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan
Kel
urah
an B
ebal
i
(・D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan
Des
a K
uta)
1) P
erka
BN
PB
1-2
012
(Gen
eral
Gui
deli
ne o
n D
isas
ter
Res
ilie
nt V
illa
ge)
2) T
echn
ical
Gui
deli
ne f
or th
e Im
plem
enta
tion
of
Dis
aste
r R
esil
ient
Vil
lage
Pro
gram
201
2 (B
NP
B, 2
012)
3)
Tec
hnic
al G
uide
line
for
the
Impl
emen
tati
on o
f D
isas
ter
Res
ilie
nt V
illa
ge P
rogr
am 2
013
(BN
PB
, 201
3)
4) T
echn
ical
Gui
deli
ne f
or th
e Im
plem
enta
tion
of
Dis
aste
r R
esil
ient
Vil
lage
Pro
gram
201
4 (B
NP
B, 2
014)
5)
Tec
hnic
al G
uide
line
for
the
prep
arat
ion
of D
isas
ter
Ris
k A
sses
men
t at V
illa
ge L
evel
(B
NP
B, 2
013)
.
・ M
odul
e of
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Bas
ic T
rain
ing
(Mod
ule
for
Fac
ilit
ator
) w
as d
evel
oped
in 2
012
by B
NP
B a
nd A
IFD
R. D
evel
opm
ent o
f re
spec
tive
mod
ule
(e.g
. mod
ule
for
CB
DR
M
trai
ning
) ha
s si
nce
stal
led.
・ T
he g
ood
prac
tice
rep
ort i
s ex
pcte
d to
be
used
as
a re
fere
nce
to im
prov
e th
e ge
nera
l/te
chni
cal
guid
elin
e fo
r D
isas
ter
Res
ilie
nt V
illa
ge a
s w
ell
as th
e B
NP
B tr
aini
ng m
odul
e.
Not
e) T
he d
ocum
ents
wit
h un
derl
ine
(am
ong
proj
ect o
utpu
ts)
wil
l be
revi
sed/
upda
ted
upon
the
com
plet
ion
of a
ctiv
itie
s in
NT
B
A-29
Ap
pen
dix
12:
Eva
luat
ion
Gri
d b
ased
on
th
e 5
Cri
teri
a
1 A
pril
201
5
Eva
luat
ion
Cri
teri
aE
valu
atio
n Q
uest
ion
Info
rmat
ion
to b
e C
olle
cted
D
ata
sour
ce a
nd M
eans
1.
Rel
evan
ce
1.1
Dev
elop
men
ts o
f pol
icie
s/st
rate
gies
at t
he
nati
onal
or
loca
l lev
el a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith
disa
ster
man
agem
ent.
・P
rogr
ess
on th
e on
goin
g re
visi
on o
f th
e fo
llow
ing
docu
men
ts:
1) N
atio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan
(201
5-20
19)
(dra
ft)
2) P
erka
No.
4/20
08 (
The
Gui
deli
ne f
or F
orm
ulat
ion
of D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan)
(dr
aft)
3)
Per
ka N
o. 2
/201
2 (G
ener
al G
uide
line
on
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Ass
essm
ent f
or D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent
Pla
nnin
g)
・A
re th
ere
any
new
dev
elop
men
t of
rele
vant
pol
icy
docu
men
ts o
n di
sast
er m
anag
emen
t ?
・B
NP
B in
terv
iew
/que
stio
nnai
re
・W
ebsi
te
・H
eari
ng w
ith
BA
PP
EN
AS
, Min
of
Hom
e A
ffai
rs, a
nd o
ther
rel
evan
t org
aniz
atio
ns
1.2
Ali
gnm
ent o
f th
e P
roje
ct w
ith
the
need
s an
d ex
pect
atio
n of
the
impl
emen
ting
or
gani
zati
ons.
・H
ow th
e P
roje
ct h
as h
elpe
d B
NP
B/B
PB
Ds
achi
eve
thei
r m
anda
tes?
・
Whi
ch P
rior
itie
s fo
r Act
ion
in H
FA h
as th
e P
roje
ct h
elpe
d pa
rtic
ular
ly?
1) N
atio
nal P
rogr
ess
Rep
ort o
n th
e Im
plem
enta
tion
of
the
HFA
(20
13-2
015)
2) L
ocal
Pro
gres
s R
epor
t on
the
Impl
emen
tati
on o
f H
FA, B
itun
g (2
013-
2014
)
3) L
ocal
Pro
gres
s R
epor
t on
the
Impl
emen
tati
on o
f H
FA, N
orth
Lom
bok
(201
3-20
14)
・
Are
BN
PB
/BP
BD
cou
nter
part
s co
nsid
erin
g pr
ojec
t act
ivit
ies
as a
par
t of
thei
r ow
n T
OR
?
・B
NP
B in
terv
iew
/que
stio
nnai
re
・
BP
BD
s (i
n pa
rtic
ular
, Bit
ung
and
Nor
th
Lom
bok)
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Rel
evan
t pol
icy
docu
men
ts, w
ebsi
te
1.3
App
ropr
iate
ness
of
the
sele
ctio
n of
pil
ot
site
s (e
.g. c
ases
of
rece
nt d
isas
ters
).
・1st
pil
ot p
rovi
nce:
Nor
th S
ulaw
esi P
rovi
nce
(SU
LU
T)
4 K
ota
(Man
ado,
Tom
ohon
, Bit
ung,
Kot
amob
agu)
11
Kab
upat
en: B
olaa
ng M
ongo
ndow
Bol
aang
Mon
gond
ow U
tara
(N
orth
)
Bol
aang
Mon
gond
ow S
elat
an (
Sou
th)
B
olaa
ng M
ondo
ndow
Tim
ur (
east
)
Min
ahas
a
Min
ahas
a U
tara
(N
orth
)
Min
ahas
a S
elat
an (
Sou
th)
Min
ahas
a Te
ngga
ra (
Sou
thea
st)
Kep
ulau
an S
itar
o
Kep
ulau
an S
angi
he
K
epul
auan
Tal
aud
・2nd
P p
ilot
pro
vinc
e: W
est N
usa
Teng
gara
(N
TB
) K
ota
Mat
aram
K
ab. L
ombo
k N
orth
K
ab. L
ombo
k W
est
L
ombo
k Is
land
K
ab. L
ombo
k C
entr
al
Kab
. Lom
bok
Eas
t K
ota
Bim
a K
ab. B
ima
Kab
. Dom
pu
S
umba
wa
Isla
nd
Kab
. Sum
baw
a
Kab
. Sum
baw
a W
est
・A
re th
ere
any
case
s of
rec
ent d
isas
ters
in th
e pi
lot s
ites
(e.
g. F
lood
in M
anad
o ci
ty in
Jan
201
4)?
・B
NP
B in
terv
iew
/que
stio
nnai
re
・B
PB
Ds
in S
UL
UT
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
BP
BD
s in
NT
B in
terv
iew
/que
stio
nnai
re
・E
xper
t int
ervi
ew a
nd P
rogr
ess
repo
rt
1) P
rovi
ncia
l/re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
BP
BD
s w
ith
unde
rlin
e on
the
left
col
umn
wil
l be
visi
ted
duri
ng th
e te
rmin
al e
valu
atio
n
2) A
ll B
PB
Ds
in N
TB
wil
l gat
her
at th
e W
/S
sche
dule
d on
14,
16,
and
eva
cuat
ion
dril
l on
18 A
pril
201
5.
1.4
Cha
nges
of
stru
ctur
e or
sta
ff o
f im
plem
enti
ng o
rgan
izat
ions
that
may
af
fect
the
Pro
ject
impl
emen
tati
on.
・Is
ther
e m
ajor
cha
nges
of
the
proj
ect i
mpl
emen
tati
on s
truc
ture
, inc
ludi
ng m
ain
coun
terp
art?
・
Did
the
chan
ge o
f P
roje
ct D
irec
tor
have
any
infl
uenc
e on
pro
ject
impl
emen
tati
on?
1) A
ug 2
013
(Mr.
Sug
eng →
Mr.
Dod
y)
2
) 16
Oct
201
4 (M
r. D
ody →
Mr.W
isnu
)
・B
NP
B, B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
Pro
gres
s re
port
1.5
Pri
orit
y ar
eas
of th
e G
over
nmen
t of
Japa
n fo
r th
e de
velo
pmen
t coo
pera
tion
to
Indo
nesi
a.
・A
lign
men
t wit
h th
e D
evel
opm
ent C
oope
rati
on C
hart
er (
deci
ded
by th
e C
abin
et in
Feb
201
5) –
One
of
its
Pri
orit
y P
olic
ies
(Bui
ldin
g a
sust
aina
ble
and
resi
lien
t int
erna
tion
al c
omm
unit
y th
roug
h ef
fort
s to
add
ress
glo
bal c
hall
enge
s) c
once
rns
natu
ral d
isas
ter
and
its
risk
red
ucti
on.
・
Any
rec
ent u
pdat
e on
Jap
an’s
coo
pera
tion
pol
icy
for
Indo
nesi
a (A
pril
201
2)
・A
lign
men
t wit
h th
e S
enda
i Fra
mew
ork
for
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Red
ucti
on (
2015
-203
0) –
Its
Exp
ecte
d ou
tcom
e/go
al a
nd f
our
Pri
orit
ies
for
acti
on: 1
) U
nder
stan
ding
dis
aste
r ri
sk, 2
) St
reng
then
ing
disa
ster
ris
k go
vern
ance
, 3)
Inve
stin
g in
dis
aste
r ri
sk r
educ
tion
for
res
ilie
nce,
4)
Enh
anci
ng
disa
ster
ris
k pr
epar
edne
ss f
or e
ffec
tive
res
pons
e, a
nd to
“B
uild
Bac
k B
ette
r”
・D
ocum
ents
fro
m w
ebsi
te
・JI
CA
and
Jap
anes
e em
bass
y
A-30
2. E
ffec
tive
ness
2.1
Pro
gres
s of
Out
put 1
- T
he c
apac
ity
for
the
rege
ncy/
mun
icip
alit
y B
PB
Ds
to
accu
mul
ate
disa
ster
dat
a/in
form
atio
n w
hich
are
fun
dam
enta
l for
dis
aste
r ri
sk
man
agem
ent a
nd im
prov
e ac
cura
cy o
f suc
h da
ta/i
nfor
mat
ion
in th
e ta
rget
are
a is
en
hanc
ed.
The
leve
l of
achi
evem
ent a
nd a
ctiv
ity
prog
ress
is s
umm
ariz
ed in
the
Res
ult G
rid.
・
Pra
ctic
abil
ity
of T
echn
ical
gui
deli
ne f
or c
olle
ctin
g an
d st
orin
g di
sast
er d
ata/
info
rmat
ion
(ver
1.0)
S
ep 2
013
・T
he e
xten
t to
whi
ch a
ctua
l im
prov
emen
t of
disa
ster
dat
a qu
alit
y in
SU
LU
T.
・B
NP
B in
terv
iew
/que
stio
nnai
re
(Pro
ject
Man
ager
3: H
ead
of D
ata,
In
form
atio
n an
d P
ubli
c R
elat
ion
Cen
ter)
・
BP
BD
s in
SU
LU
T in
terv
iew
/que
stio
nnai
re
・E
xper
t int
ervi
ew a
nd p
rogr
ess
repo
rt
2.2
Pro
gres
s of
Out
put 2
- T
he c
apac
ity
for
crea
tion
of
Haz
ard
and
risk
map
s at
re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
leve
l in
the
targ
et
area
is e
nhan
ced.
The
leve
l of
achi
evem
ent a
nd a
ctiv
ity
prog
ress
is s
umm
ariz
ed in
the
Res
ult G
rid.
・
Pra
ctic
abil
ity
of T
echn
ical
Gui
deli
ne f
or C
reat
ion
of H
azar
d M
ap f
or R
egen
cies
/Mun
icip
alit
ies
(Ver
. 2)
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith
Per
ka N
o.2/
2012
. ・
Doe
s B
PB
D s
taff
in S
UL
UT
uti
lize
the
hand
ed-o
ver
GIS
equ
ipm
ent (
and
upda
te h
azar
d/ri
sk m
aps)
on
thei
r ow
n?
・B
NP
B in
terv
iew
/que
stio
nnai
re
(Pro
ject
Man
ager
1: D
irec
tor
of D
isas
ter
Ris
k R
educ
tion
) (P
roje
ct M
anag
er 3
: Hea
d of
Dat
a,
Info
rmat
ion
and
Pub
lic
Rel
atio
n C
ente
r)
・B
PB
D in
terv
iew
/que
stio
nnai
re
・E
xper
t int
ervi
ew a
nd p
rogr
ess
repo
rt
・G
IS s
uppo
rt te
am in
terv
iew
2.
3 P
rogr
ess
of O
utpu
t 3 -
The
cap
acit
y fo
r fo
rmul
atio
n of
Reg
iona
l dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t pla
ns f
or
rege
ncy/
mun
icip
alit
y in
the
targ
et a
rea
is
enha
nced
.
The
leve
l of
achi
evem
ent a
nd a
ctiv
ity
prog
ress
is s
umm
ariz
ed in
the
Res
ult G
rid.
・P
ract
icab
ilit
y of
the
Tech
nica
l Gui
deli
ne o
f R
egio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan
for
Kab
upat
en/K
ota,
whi
ch c
an b
ecom
e an
Ann
ex to
the
Per
ka N
o.4/
2008
. ・
Pra
ctic
abil
ity
of th
e Te
chni
cal G
uide
line
for
For
mul
atio
n of
SO
P.
・L
ates
t sta
tus
of th
e si
gnin
g of
the
14 d
evel
oped
RD
MP
s in
SU
LU
T.
・D
evel
opm
ent/
revi
sion
sta
tus
of S
OP
s (K
abup
aten
Sit
aro,
Kot
a To
moh
o, K
otam
obag
u, a
nd B
itun
g).
・B
NP
B in
terv
iew
/que
stio
nnai
re
(Pro
ject
Man
ager
1: D
irec
tor
of D
isas
ter
Ris
k R
educ
tion
) (P
roje
ct M
anag
er 2
: Dir
ecto
r fo
r P
repa
redn
ess)
(M
ain
coun
terp
art f
or th
e O
utpu
t 3)
・E
xper
t int
ervi
ew a
nd p
rogr
ess
repo
rt
・L
ocal
con
sult
ant i
nter
view
2.
4 P
rogr
ess
of O
utpu
t 4 -
The
cap
acit
y fo
r co
nduc
ting
Dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t ex
erci
ses
at th
e re
genc
y/m
unic
ipal
ity
in
the
targ
et a
rea
is e
nhan
ced.
The
leve
l of
achi
evem
ent a
nd a
ctiv
ity
prog
ress
is s
umm
ariz
ed in
the
Res
ult G
rid.
・P
ract
icab
ilit
y of
Tec
hnic
al G
uide
line
for
Dis
aste
r R
elie
f E
xerc
ise,
incl
udin
g T
TX
(Ta
ble
Top
Exe
rcis
e) a
nd C
PX
(C
omm
and
Pos
t Exe
rcis
e) m
anua
ls.
・
Whe
n th
e D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent D
rill
(C
PX
) w
as c
ondu
cted
vol
unta
rily
by
prov
inci
al a
nd B
itun
g B
PB
D a
nd h
ow w
as it
use
ful?
・H
ow M
anad
o B
PB
D b
ette
r re
spon
ded
wit
h pr
ojec
t exp
erie
nce
at th
e fl
ood
in F
eb 2
013
and
Jan
2014
? ・
Cur
rent
sta
tus
of C
BD
RM
act
ivit
ies
in th
e pi
lot v
illa
ges
S
UL
UT
1)
Des
a M
oyag
, Kot
a K
otam
obag
u
2
) K
elur
ahan
Beb
ali,
Kab
upat
en S
itar
o
NT
B
1)
Des
a K
uta,
Kab
upat
en L
ombo
k C
entr
al
・B
NP
B in
terv
iew
/que
stio
nnai
re
(Pro
ject
Man
ager
2: D
irec
tor
for
Pre
pare
dnes
s)
(Pro
ject
Man
ager
4: D
irec
tor
for
Com
mun
ity
Em
pow
erm
ent)
・
Nor
th S
ulaw
esi a
nd B
itun
g B
PB
D
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Man
ado
BP
BD
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Reg
ency
/Mun
icip
al B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
pro
gres
s re
port
・
Loc
al c
onsu
ltan
t int
ervi
ew
2.5
Pro
gres
s of
Out
put 5
- N
atio
nwid
e di
ssem
inat
ion
acti
viti
es a
re im
plem
ente
d.
The
leve
l of
achi
evem
ent a
nd a
ctiv
ity
prog
ress
is s
umm
ariz
ed in
the
Res
ult G
rid.
・W
hich
BN
PB
sec
tion
is m
ainl
y re
spon
sibl
e fo
r O
utpu
t 5?
・
How
Pro
ject
act
ivit
ies
are
diff
eren
t fro
m o
ther
RD
MP
s fo
rmul
atio
n ac
tivi
ties
(an
d ea
rthq
uake
ha
zard
map
) pr
omot
ed b
y B
NP
B it
self
?
・B
NP
B in
terv
iew
/que
stio
nnai
re
・E
xper
t int
ervi
ew a
nd p
rogr
ess
repo
rt
2.6
Pro
spec
t of
the
Pro
ject
Pur
pose
to b
e ac
hiev
ed b
y th
e en
d of
pro
ject
per
iod.
・
The
leve
l of
achi
evem
ent r
evie
wed
in li
ght o
f th
e P
roje
ct P
urpo
se/O
utpu
t ind
icat
ors.
・
Any
act
ual c
ases
of
dem
onst
rati
on/a
ppli
cati
on o
f en
hanc
ed c
apac
ity
of B
NP
B/B
PB
Ds
at o
ccas
ions
of
nat
ural
dis
aste
rs?
(e.g
. flo
od e
vent
s at
Man
ado
Cit
y on
17
Feb
201
3 an
d Ja
n 20
14)
・B
NP
B a
nd B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
pro
gres
s re
port
2.7
Act
ions
take
n in
res
pons
e to
the
reco
mm
enda
tion
s m
ade
at th
e M
id-t
erm
re
view
.
1) R
emai
ning
act
ivit
ies
in S
UL
UT
・
Par
tici
pati
on o
f B
PB
Ds
to W
/S,
appr
oval
of
RD
MP
s by
loc
al a
utho
riti
es,
impl
emen
tati
on o
f R
DM
Ps,
Fol
low
-up
on a
ctiv
itie
s by
the
Pro
ject
2)
Im
plem
enta
tion
pol
icy
of th
e 2nd
hal
f of
the
Pro
ject
・St
reng
then
ing
capa
city
of
BN
PB
(an
d na
tion
al c
onsu
ltan
ts a
s w
ell a
s th
e A
ssis
tant
Tea
m)
3)
Mod
ific
atio
n of
the
PD
M (
addi
tion
of
Out
put 5
for
nat
ionw
ide
diss
emin
atio
n of
pro
ject
out
puts
) 4)
Col
labo
rati
on w
ith
rele
vant
age
ncie
s (e
.g. P
U, B
MK
G, B
PP
T, L
IPI
and
CV
GH
M)
・B
NP
B a
nd B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
pro
gres
s re
port
A-31
3. E
ffic
ienc
y
3.1
Cla
rity
and
und
erst
andi
ng o
f th
e ov
eral
l pl
an o
f th
e P
roje
ct –
PD
M.
・R
/D w
as s
igne
d on
11
July
201
1
・R
evis
ion
of P
DM
at 4
th J
CC
(3
Apr
201
4)
1) c
hang
e of
the
2nd p
ilot
pro
vinc
e (B
ali →
NT
B)
2) A
ctiv
itie
s in
NT
B (
foc
usin
g on
Out
put 2
, Out
put 3
-1, O
utpu
t 4-2
)
3) A
ddit
ion
of O
utpu
t 5 (
nati
onw
ide
diss
emin
atio
n of
pro
ject
out
puts
suc
h as
the
Tech
nica
l G
uide
line
of
RD
MP
for
Kab
upat
en/K
ota,
and
tech
nica
l inp
uts
for
eart
hqua
ke h
azar
d m
aps)
・
Is th
e vi
ew o
n th
e le
vel o
f ac
hiev
emen
t of
the
Pro
ject
dis
crep
ant b
etw
een
expe
rt a
nd c
ount
erpa
rt?
・Is
ther
e an
y si
gnif
ican
t dif
fere
nce
betw
een
plan
of
oper
atio
n an
d ac
tual
impl
emen
tati
on?
・B
NP
B, B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
3.2
Dis
patc
h of
Jap
anes
e ex
pert
s (a
ssig
nmen
t, ex
pert
ise,
num
ber
of e
xper
ts,
dura
tion
and
tim
ing)
.
・T
he p
roje
ct s
tart
ed o
n 22
Nov
embe
r 20
11 (
4 ye
ars)
・
Has
the
assi
gnm
ent o
f ex
pert
s (t
otal
18
expe
rts)
bee
n ap
prop
riat
e?
・B
NP
B, B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
pro
gres
s re
port
3.3
Pro
visi
on o
f eq
uipm
ent (
qual
ity
and
quan
tity
, tim
ing
of d
eliv
ery)
. ・
Is th
e L
ette
r of
Han
d-ov
er o
f th
e G
IS e
quip
men
t to
BP
BD
SU
LU
T a
vail
able
?
・
Wha
t is
the
mai
nten
ance
and
uti
liza
tion
sta
tus
of th
e ha
nded
-ove
r G
IS e
quip
men
t at B
PB
D
SU
LU
T?
・
Any
new
pro
cure
men
t of
equi
pmen
t for
NT
B?
・B
NP
B in
terv
iew
/que
stio
nnai
re
・B
PB
D S
UL
UT
inte
rvie
w
・B
PB
D N
TB
inte
rvie
w
・E
xper
t int
ervi
ew a
nd p
rogr
ess
repo
rt
3.4
Cou
nter
part
Tra
inin
g in
Jap
an
(sub
ject
/cur
ricu
lum
, dur
atio
n/ti
min
g,
sele
ctio
n of
trai
nees
).
・S
ubje
ct a
nd c
urri
culu
m
・D
urat
ion
and
tim
ing
1)
25
Aug
– 8
Sep
201
2, p
arti
cipa
ted
by B
NP
B a
nd S
UL
UT
cou
nter
part
2) 1
6-30
Aug
201
4, p
arti
cipa
ted
by B
NP
B, N
TB
cou
nter
part
s as
wel
l as
the
new
dir
ecto
r of
S
UL
UT
BP
BD
and
that
of
Bit
ung
BP
BD
for
sha
ring
of
expe
rien
ce)
・B
NP
B, B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
pro
gres
s re
port
3.5
Con
trib
utio
n of
cou
nter
part
per
sonn
el
(num
ber
of s
taff
, rol
e an
d re
spon
sibi
lity,
ti
me
and
effo
rt).
・ H
ow c
ompe
ting
dut
ies/
tim
e of
BN
PB
cou
nter
part
on
the
Pro
ject
bee
n re
solv
ed?
(The
ir a
tten
danc
e to
W/S
at p
ilot
pro
vinc
es is
incr
easi
ng. R
ecog
niti
on o
f B
NP
B o
n pr
ojec
t act
ivit
ies
is a
lso
incr
easi
ng b
ased
on
good
pra
ctic
es a
nd f
eedb
ack
from
SU
LU
T.)
・
Wha
t are
maj
or r
easo
ns o
f in
crea
sed
sens
e of
ow
ners
hip
on p
roje
ct a
ctiv
itie
s by
BP
BD
co
unte
rpar
t? (
Par
tici
pati
on a
nd w
illi
ngne
ss o
f N
TB
cou
nter
part
is h
ighe
r th
an th
ose
of S
UL
UT
co
unte
rpar
t.)
・B
NP
B in
terv
iew
/que
stio
nnai
re
・B
PB
Ds
in S
UL
UT
inte
rvie
w
・B
PB
Ds
in N
TB
inte
rvie
w
・E
xper
t int
ervi
ew a
nd p
rogr
ess
repo
rt
3.6
Cou
nter
-bud
get f
or th
e pr
ojec
t im
plem
enta
tion
(sh
are
of o
pera
tion
al
cost
s).
・H
ow B
PB
Ds
in N
TB
is b
ette
r m
anag
ing
nece
ssar
y ex
pens
es th
an B
PB
Ds
in S
UL
UT
? (C
ost-
shar
ing
of B
PB
Ds
to a
tten
d W
/S w
as in
dica
ted
as o
ne o
f co
nstr
aint
s in
the
Mid
-ter
m
revi
ew. T
he p
arti
cipa
tion
and
ach
ieve
men
t of
BPB
Ds,
how
ever
, was
hig
her
than
exp
ecte
d.)
・B
NP
B in
terv
iew
/que
stio
nnai
re
・B
PB
Ds
in S
UL
UT
inte
rvie
w
・B
PB
Ds
in N
TB
inte
rvie
w
・E
xper
t int
ervi
ew a
nd p
rogr
ess
repo
rt
3.7
Com
mun
icat
ion
(per
iodi
cal a
nd d
aily
) fo
r pr
ojec
t coo
rdin
atio
n be
twee
n im
plem
enti
ng o
rgan
izat
ions
and
the
Japa
nese
exp
erts
.
・JC
C m
eeti
ng: 1
st (
18 J
anua
ry 2
012)
, 2nd
(11
Jul
y 20
12),
3rd
(12
Sep
tem
ber
2013
), 4
th (
3 A
pr 2
014)
in
clud
ing
the
revi
sion
of
PD
M s
uch
as th
e 2nd
targ
et p
rovi
nce
of N
TB
・JI
CA
exp
erts
reg
ular
ly v
isit
BN
PB
whe
n th
ey a
rriv
e an
d le
ave
Indo
nesi
a to
ens
ure
good
co
mm
unic
atio
n.
・Is
the
com
mun
icat
ion
whe
n ex
pert
s do
n’t s
tay
in I
ndon
esia
goo
d en
ough
?
・N
umbe
r of
New
s L
ette
rs (
1st in
Feb
201
2, 2
nd in
Jul
201
2, 3
rd in
Mar
201
3, 4
th in
Jan
201
4, 5
th in
O
ct 2
014)
・B
NP
B, B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
pro
gres
s re
port
3.8
Com
mun
icat
ion
(per
iodi
cal a
nd d
aily
) fo
r pr
ojec
t coo
rdin
atio
n am
ong
Indo
nesi
an
orga
niza
tion
.
・In
vita
tion
lett
er a
nd r
epor
t of
mee
ting
s am
ong
BP
BD
s ha
s be
en s
uffi
cien
t?
・
Any
eff
ects
of
targ
etin
g al
l Kab
/Kot
a in
the
pilo
t pro
vinc
e (e
.g. I
t has
cau
sed
nota
ble
posi
tive
im
pact
s: e
.g. i
ncre
ased
com
mun
icat
ion,
info
rmat
ion
shar
ing
and
mut
ual l
earn
ing,
hea
lthy
co
mpe
titi
ve s
piri
t am
ong
BP
BD
sta
ff)
・Is
ther
e an
y ca
se o
f im
prov
ed c
omm
unic
atio
n du
e to
the
Pro
ject
(e.
g. I
n th
e pr
oces
s of
col
leti
ng
nece
ssar
y da
ta f
or r
isk
map
s an
d as
sess
men
t, th
e re
lati
ons
wit
h B
PB
D a
nd o
rgan
izat
ions
on
wea
ther
, pub
lic
wor
k, a
gric
ultu
re a
nd la
nd u
se h
as b
een
stre
ngth
ened
.)
・B
NP
B, B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
pro
gres
s re
port
3.9
Met
hods
and
con
tent
s of
tech
nolo
gy
tran
sfer
fro
m J
apan
ese
expe
rts
to
coun
terp
art p
erso
nnel
.
・O
n th
e jo
b tr
aini
ng a
nd le
arni
ng th
roug
h im
plem
enta
tion
pro
cess
es h
ave
been
eff
ecti
ve?
・
Are
ther
e an
y ad
diti
onal
trai
ning
opp
ortu
niti
es o
n D
RM
in I
ndon
esia
? ・
Adv
anta
ges
of te
chno
logy
in J
apan
(in
com
pari
son
wit
h th
ose
of th
ird
coun
trie
s) s
till
val
id?
・B
NP
B, B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
pro
gres
s re
port
3.10
Pro
mot
ing/
hind
erin
g fa
ctor
s th
at m
ay
have
aff
ecte
d th
e P
roje
ct
impl
emen
tati
on.
・A
ny c
ases
of
the
infl
uenc
e of
the
PDM
impo
rtan
t ass
umpt
ions
? ・
Are
ther
e no
tabl
e pr
omot
ing/
hind
erin
g fa
ctor
s?
・B
NP
B, B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
pro
gres
s re
port
A-32
Not
e) D
ocum
ents
wit
h un
derl
ine
are
alre
ady
coll
ecte
d.
4. I
mpa
ct
4.1
Pro
spec
t of
the
Ove
rall
Goa
l (ut
iliz
atio
n of
mat
eria
ls a
nd m
etho
dolo
gy b
y th
e P
roje
ct, a
nd th
ereb
y en
hanc
ing
BP
BD
s be
yond
the
targ
et a
reas
) to
be
achi
eved
3-
5 ye
ars
afte
r th
e pr
ojec
t end
.
・Is
the
Ove
rall
Goa
l is
stil
l app
ropr
iate
? ・
Wha
t is
curr
ent p
lans
/act
ivit
ies
tow
ards
ach
ievi
ng th
e O
vera
ll G
oal,
besi
des
the
poss
ible
inpu
ts o
n th
e fo
llow
ing
two
docu
men
ts?
1) N
atio
nal D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan
(201
5-20
19)
(dra
ft)
2) P
erka
No.
4/20
08 (
The
Gui
deli
ne f
or F
orm
ulat
ion
of D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan)
(dr
aft)
・B
NP
B, B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
pro
gres
s re
port
4.2
Met
hodo
logy
for
dis
sem
inat
ion
to o
ther
ar
eas.
・
How
the
Pro
ject
out
puts
is b
eing
inco
rpor
ated
into
the
BN
PB
’s o
wn
init
iati
ve? →
Out
put 5
1) R
DM
Ps
form
ulat
ion
acti
viti
es (
and
eart
hqua
ke h
azar
d m
ap)
prom
oted
by
BN
PB
itse
lf
2)
Dis
aste
r R
esil
ient
Vil
lage
Pro
gram
pro
mot
ed b
y B
NP
B it
self
?
・B
NP
B, B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
pro
gres
s re
port
4.3
Ong
oing
/pos
sibl
e co
llab
orat
ions
, if
any,
w
ith
mul
ti/b
i-la
tera
l dev
elop
men
t par
tner
s (U
N, N
GO
, civ
il s
ocie
ty, a
nd p
riva
te
sect
or).
・A
ny s
yner
gy a
mon
g ot
her
Japa
nese
coo
pera
tion
sch
eme
(Pol
icy
Adv
isor
, JO
CV
, Aid
gra
nt f
or
gras
s-ro
ot g
roup
s)?
・A
ny in
form
atio
n sh
arin
g an
d co
llab
orat
ion
amon
g U
N a
genc
ies/
NG
O o
ngoi
ng?
1) U
ND
P (S
afer
Com
mun
ity
thro
ugh
Dis
aste
r R
isk
Red
ucti
on, f
inan
ced
by U
ND
P, A
usA
ID a
nd
DF
ID)
2)
Aus
AID
(A
ustr
alia
Ind
ones
ia F
acil
ity
for
Dis
aste
r R
educ
tion
) 3)
Wor
ld B
ank
4) G
IZ
5) F
renc
h G
over
nmen
t and
Fre
nch
Red
Cro
ss
・B
NP
B, B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
pro
gres
s re
port
4.4
Any
pos
itiv
e/ne
gati
ve im
pact
bro
ught
ab
out b
y th
e P
roje
ct (
Pol
icy
and
rese
arch
de
velo
pmen
t, P
over
ty r
educ
tion
, en
viro
nmen
tal p
rote
ctio
n, a
nd g
ende
r eq
uali
ty.)
・P
over
ty R
educ
tion
, Env
iron
men
tal p
rote
ctio
n, G
ende
r eq
uali
ty.
・
Any
par
ticu
lar
resp
onse
s/qu
erie
s en
sued
fro
m th
e pr
esen
tati
on b
y th
e P
roje
ct a
t the
Ann
ual B
NP
B
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
on
15 O
ct 2
014?
・
Any
oth
er r
elev
ant e
vent
s/pr
esen
tati
on in
Ind
ones
ia a
nd o
ther
cou
ntri
es?
1) J
oint
Sem
inar
on
Vol
cani
c A
ctiv
ity
and
Enh
ance
men
t of
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Cap
acit
y in
N
orth
Sul
awes
i Pro
vinc
e (2
4 M
ay 2
013)
, org
aniz
ed b
y B
NP
B, N
orth
Sul
awes
i BP
BD
and
JI
CA
Pro
ject
Tea
m.
2)
Pre
sent
atio
n at
a J
ICA
sid
e ev
ent o
f Asi
a M
inis
teri
al C
onfe
renc
e on
DR
R (
23 J
une
2014
, T
hail
and)
3)
Pre
sent
atio
n at
the
UN
Wor
ld C
onfe
renc
e on
DR
R S
enda
i, Ja
pan
(14-
18 M
ar 2
015)
・B
NP
B, B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
pro
gres
s re
port
5. S
usta
inab
ilit
y 5.
1 P
rosp
ect f
rom
inst
itut
iona
l vie
wpo
int
(Pla
n of
org
aniz
atio
n, P
arti
cipa
tion
of
stak
ehol
ders
).
・Is
BN
PB
’s c
omm
itm
ent o
bser
ved
(ref
eren
ce in
doc
umen
t/pl
an, s
peec
h an
d re
mar
ks a
t m
eeti
ngs/
sem
inar
, act
ivit
ies
on th
eir
own
budg
et, e
tc.)
on
achi
evin
g/su
stai
ning
the
Pro
ject
P
urpo
se a
nd e
xten
d th
em to
war
ds th
e O
vera
ll G
oal?
・Is
ther
e an
y of
fici
al a
rran
gem
ent a
mon
g re
leva
nt o
rgan
izat
ions
to s
usta
in p
roje
ct a
ctiv
itie
s (e
.g.
MO
U a
mon
g or
gani
zati
ons,
TO
R f
or r
egul
ar m
eeti
ng, e
tc.)
・B
NP
B, B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
pro
gres
s re
port
5.2
Pro
spec
t fro
m te
chni
cal v
iew
poin
t (m
aint
enan
ce o
f eq
uipm
ent/
faci
liti
es,
man
agem
ent o
f m
ater
ials
/man
uals
, tr
aini
ng o
ppor
tuni
ties
).
・Is
the
owne
rshi
p of
all
the
docu
men
t pre
pare
d in
the
Pro
ject
cle
ar?
(Res
pons
ible
sec
tion
, man
agem
ent o
f or
igin
al f
ile,
bud
get t
o du
plic
ate
the
copy
, arr
ange
men
t of
coop
erat
ion
in c
ase
of r
evis
ion,
etc
.)
・T
he h
ande
d-ov
er G
IS e
quip
men
t at B
PB
D S
UL
UT
can
con
tinu
e to
be
util
ized
(in
clud
ing
poss
ibil
itie
s of
con
trac
ting
-out
to e
xter
nal e
ngin
eers
or
cons
igni
ng to
oth
er in
stit
utio
ns s
uch
as
BA
PP
ED
A a
nd u
nive
rsit
ies)
?
・
Any
add
itio
nal t
rain
ing
oppo
rtun
itie
s fo
r B
NP
B/B
PB
D s
taff
to r
efre
sh s
kill
s an
d kn
owle
dge?
・B
NP
B, B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
pro
gres
s re
port
5.3
Pro
spec
t fro
m H
uman
Res
ourc
e vi
ewpo
int (
poss
ibili
ty o
f st
aff
incr
ease
, co
llab
orat
ion
wit
h ot
her
orga
niza
tion
s).
・Is
con
tinu
ed a
ssig
nmen
t of
resp
onsi
ble
pers
ons
and
the
incr
ease
of
staf
f fo
rese
eabl
e?
1)
Num
ber
of B
NP
B s
taff
, inc
reas
e of
wor
kloa
d, p
lan
to m
ove
to a
new
bui
ldin
g
2)
Num
ber
of B
PB
D S
UL
UT
and
NT
B s
taff
, reg
ency
/mun
icip
al B
PB
Ds
・A
re th
ese
staf
f pe
rman
ent o
r te
mpo
rary
? ・
Dev
elop
men
t of
hum
an r
esou
rces
(co
unte
rpar
t) th
roug
h P
roje
ct a
ctiv
itie
s re
cogn
ized
?
・A
ny c
ase
of c
olla
bora
tion
wit
h ot
her
orga
niza
tion
s fo
r sh
arin
g w
ork
role
s/re
spon
sibi
liti
es?
・B
NP
B, B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Exp
ert i
nter
view
and
pro
gres
s re
port
5.4
Pro
spec
t fro
m F
undi
ng v
iew
poin
t (B
udge
t all
ocat
ion
for
the
acti
viti
es,
Ext
erna
l fin
anci
ng f
rom
don
or/p
riva
te
sect
or).
・A
ctua
l yea
rly
budg
et a
lloc
atio
n of
BP
BD
s in
SU
LU
T a
nd N
TB
to im
plem
ent p
roje
ct a
ctiv
itie
s ・
Stat
us o
f th
e M
inis
try
of H
ome
Aff
airs
’ reg
ulat
ion,
whi
ch a
llow
s th
e lo
cal g
over
nmen
t to
use
1%
of it
s bu
dget
for
dis
aste
r ri
sk m
anag
emen
t
(B
NP
B d
oes
not h
ave
a hi
erar
chic
al a
utho
rity
ove
r B
PB
Ds
that
are
a p
art o
f lo
cal g
over
nmen
ts)
・P
ossi
bili
ty o
f ex
tern
al f
inan
cing
fro
m U
N a
genc
ies
or b
i-la
tera
l don
ors.
・B
NP
B, B
PB
Ds
inte
rvie
w/q
uest
ionn
aire
・
Min
istr
y of
Hom
e A
ffai
rs a
nd B
AP
PE
NA
S
hear
ing
・E
xper
t int
ervi
ew a
nd p
rogr
ess
repo
rt
A-33
A-34
A-35
Recommended