SUMP works well on different scales – experiences from Slovenia

SUMP works well on different scales – experiences from Slovenia

ECOMM 2014, Florence

Aljaž Plevnik, Mojca Balant, Luka MladenovičUrban Planning Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Presentation structure

• experiences• case of bigger city - Ljubljana• case of small city - Ljutomer• case of region - Nova Gorica• conclusions

2

3

Experiences

• involved in SUMPs since 2003• authors of 4 SUMPs • national guidance on SUMP• national SUMP platform• trainers for SI, CRO & Euromed• supporting starter cities in CH4

Experiences with SUMPs

4

Experiences with SUMPs

5

LJUBLJANA280.000 inh

Ljubljana - background

• following national SUMP project • first SUMP in Slovenia• Civitas Elan measure (2008/2012)• UIRS – measure leader & lobbyist

7

bike/walkcar

public transport

Ljubljana - process

DRIVERS• elements of SUMP implemented

• sustainable objectives for 20 ys

• EU cofinancing

• complementary measures in Civitas

• external advice

• EU experience (ELTIS, Civitas..)

8

9

VS.

Ljubljana - process

BARRIERS• no tradition with SUMP

• traditional planning culture

• opposition – „traditional“ experts

• different understanding of SUMP

• unsustainable trends for 20 ys

• poor adoption by the city

Ljubljana – conclusions

LESSONS LEARNED • early support & ownership

• traditional experts

• media & NGO‘s

• capacity building & international expertise

• IT WORKS!

10

coming in autumn 2014coming in autumn 2014

LJUTOMER10.000 inh

Ljutomer - background

12

Ljutomer - background

13

Ljutomer - process

14

Ljutomer - results

•

15

Ljutomer - results

16

Ljutomer – lessons learned

• inclusive & productive • mayor‘s support & early ownership• involvement of stakeholders• limited city capacities • influence from higher levels• regional SUMPs as solution

17

NOVA GORICA100.000 inh in region

Nova Gorica – background

19

Nova Gorica – SUMP Conference

20

“SUMPs: From Local To Territorial and Administrative Cross-Border Experiences”

Annual PUMAS Conference

Nova Gorica, Slovenia, June 4th, 2014

www.pumasproject.eu

Nova Gorica – background

21

Nova Gorica – process

22

Nova Gorica – lessons so far

BARRIERS• difficulties with coordination body• limited cooperation• language barriers• different planning systems and cultures• PT is a main topic, though limited responsibilites

23

Nova Gorica – lessons so far

Joint/regional SUMP is a better solution for: • regions with polycentric structure of the region• smaller cities with capacity problems • strong influence from higher levels of governance

24

Conclusions

FUTURE PLANS• National SUMP platform• national SUMP audit scheme• SUMP implementation

25

Conclusions

GENERAL• SUMP works well on all scales• initial ownership is crucial• guidelines are only a framework• higher level support boosts the take up• lack of knowledge and expertise• unclear legal status of SUMPs• involvement from the national level

26

Conclusions

SMALLER CITIES • inclusive and productive SUMPs• no strategic mobility planning• changes in planning practice• limited capacities • influence from higher levels• regional SUMPs as solution

27

Thank you!

Aljaž PlevnikUrban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia

Trnovski pristan 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Tel +386 1 4201323

aljaz.plevnik@uirs.si

28