Soyal Momin MS, MBA September 23, 2008

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Predictive Modeling 2008: The BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee Experience. Soyal Momin MS, MBA September 23, 2008. Outline. Maximizing the Value of Predictive Modeling: A Health Plan Perspective Care Management Challenges: Understand Population Care Management Needs Identify Stratify - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

1

Soyal Momin MS, MBASeptember 23, 2008

Predictive Modeling 2008: The BlueCross BlueShield of

Tennessee Experience

2

Outline

• Maximizing the Value of Predictive Modeling: A Health Plan Perspective

– Care Management Challenges:

• Understand Population Care Management Needs

• Identify

• Stratify

• Triage

– Care Management Model, Implementation, Process Efficiencies

• Intervene

– Care Management Programs

• Evaluate

– Conclusions

3

Care Management Challenges: Understand Population Care Management Needs

• Cost distribution and trend over time– Quantitative assessment

• Population assessment– Qualitative assessment – clinical cost drivers based

on healthcare cost (direct cost)

• Total cost assessment – direct & indirect costs– Qualitative assessment – clinical cost drivers based

on healthcare cost and personnel cost (indirect cost)

4

Understand Population Care Management NeedsCost Distribution and Trend Over TimeCumulative Total Healthcare Cost

5

Cost Distribution and Trend Over Time Cumulative Professional and Outpatient Cost

6

Cost Distribution and Trend Over Time Cumulative Pharmacy Cost

7

Cost Distribution and Trend Over Time Cumulative Inpatient Cost

8

Understand Population Care Management Needs Population Assessment

Population Assessment is an analysis of claims and membership data to determine characteristics of a given population (Network, Region, Group) that might affect the population’s interaction with the health care system

9

Propensity to Utilize Index – The average number of episodes of illness for a member month

Episode Seriousness Index – A measure of the average cost to treat the categories of illness experienced by a population

Illness Burden – A measure of the level of illness within a group determined by multiplying the propensity to utilize index by the Episode Seriousness Index

Population Assessment Major Analysis Variables

10

Provider Efficiency Index – A measure of the efficiency to treat a specific episode of illness determined by dividing the cost to treat the specific episode by the average cost for the category of illness

PMPM Cost Index – An index that measures the PMPM submitted costs for a population determined by multiplying the Illness Burden by the Provider Efficiency Index

Population Assessment Major Analysis Variables, Continued

11

Population Assessment Population Profile

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Propensity to Utilize Episode SeriousnessIndex

Provider Efficiency PMPM Cost Index

Population A Population B

12

00.020.040.060.08

0.10.120.140.16

Infectio

us Dise

ases

Endocri

nology

Hemato

logy

Psych

iatry

Chemica

l Dep

enden

cy

Neuro

logy

Ophthalmolo

gy

Cardiology

Otolar

yngo

logy

Pulmonolo

gy

Gastro

enter

ology

Hepato

logy

Nephro

logy

Urology

Obstetri

cs

Gynec

ology

Dermato

logy

Ortho &

Rhe

um

Neonato

logy

Major Practice Category

Illne

ss In

dex

Population A Population B

Population Assessment Illness Burden by Major Practice Category

13

00.5

11.5

22.5

33.5

44.5

Major Practice Category

Prov

ider

Effi

cien

cy In

dex

Population A Population B

Population Assessment Provider Efficiency by Major Practice Category

14

00.05

0.10.15

0.20.25

0.30.35

Infectio

us Dise

ases

Endocri

nology

Hemato

logy

Psych

iatry

Chemica

l Dep

enden

cy

Neuro

logy

Ophthalmolo

gy

Cardiology

Otolar

yngo

logy

Pulmonolo

gy

Gastro

enter

ology

Hepato

logy

Nephro

logy

Urology

Obstetri

cs

Gynec

ology

Dermato

logy

Ortho & R

heum

Neonato

logy

Major Practice Category

Cos

t Ind

ex

Population A Population B

Population Assessment PMPM Cost Index by Major Practice Category

15

Direct costs are dollars paid out for medical treatment Indirect costs are labor resources lost due to illness

Direct CostsDirect Costs = Inpatient + Professional/Outpatient + Pharmacy

Indirect CostsIndirect Costs = Sick Leave + Presenteeism + Family & Medical Leave + Short Term Disability + Long Term Disability

+ Turnover + Worker’s Compensation

Understand Population Care Management Needs Total Cost Assessment

16

Total Healthcare Cost = $23,237,422Total Healthcare Cost = $23,237,422$5,631 per FTE$5,631 per FTE

Direct $ = $13,761,278$3,334 / FTE

59.2%

Indirect $ = $9,476,144

$2,296 / FTE40.8%

Inpatient

$376

6.7%

Professional/Outpatient

$2,154

38.3%

Pharmacy

$804

14.3% Sick Leave

$1,322

23.5%

Presenteeism

$318

5.7%

FMLA

$274

4.9%

STD

$220

3.9%

LTD

$4

0.1%

Turnover

$74

1.3%

Work Comp

$82

1.5%

Total Healthcare Cost = $23,237,422Total Healthcare Cost = $23,237,422$5,631 per FTE$5,631 per FTE

Direct $ = $13,761,278$3,334 / FTE

59.2%

Indirect $ = $9,476,144

$2,296 / FTE40.8%

Inpatient

$376

6.7%

Professional/Outpatient

$2,154

38.3%

Pharmacy

$804

14.3% Sick Leave

$1,322

23.5%

Presenteeism

$318

5.7%

FMLA

$274

4.9%

STD

$220

3.9%

LTD

$4

0.1%

Turnover

$74

1.3%

Work Comp

$82

1.5%

Total Cost AssessmentAccount Group XYZ

17

$0

$200,000

$400,000

$600,000

$800,000

$1,000,000

$1,200,000

$1,400,000

$1,600,000

$1,800,000

$2,000,000

JOIN

T DEGEN/IN

FLAM

BENIGN NEOPLASM

GASTRO INFEC/IN

FLAM

HYPERTENSION

DEPRES & ANXIETY D

IS

ORTHO DERANGE/TRAUMA

PREG & DELIVERY W

/ C-S

EC

MALIGNANT N

EOPLASM

DIABETES

RHINITIS/SINUSITIS

PREG & DELIV N

O C-S

EC

ASTHMA

CORONARY DISEASE

OTHER CARDIAC D

IS

COND ASSOC M

ENST/INFERT

GALL BLADDER DISEASE

VISUAL DISTURBANCES

HYPERLIPIDEMIA

HEREDITARY/CONGEN D

IS

MINOR O

RTHO DIS

Direct Costs Indirect Costs

Total Cost AssessmentTop 20 Cost Drivers

18

• Identifying Members for Care Management – Referrals from

• Internal Sources• External Sources• An internally developed ICD9 Trigger list

– The ICD9 Trigger list included Asthma, Diabetes, High Risk OB, AIDs, Cancer, CHF, COPD etc

– High cost member report

• Case managers workload• 103/CM/Month

• High predicted cost member report

• Stratification index report

Care Management Challenges: Identify & Stratify Members for Care Management

19

Commercial LOB 2005

Allowed >= $50K GROUP A

N = 9,017 (100%)

PMPM: $9,025PMPY: $108,305

Average MM: 10.98

IP PFO Rx $4,379 $4,211 $441 $52,543 $50,534 $5,289

Experience in 2006

Allowed >= $50K GROUP B

N = 1,968 (22%)

PMPM: $10,706PMPY: $128,469

Average MM: 11.12

IP PFO Rx $3,107 $6,686 $913 $37,280 $80,232 $10,957

?N = 7,049 (78%)

Eligible Members With < $50KGROUP C

N =5,180 (57%)

PMPM: $1,414PMPY: $16,966

Average MM: 10.44

MembersNot

EligibleN = 1,723 (19%)

Eligible MembersW/O Claims$N = 146 (2%)

N = 2,011,903

PMPY: $2,979

Identify & Stratify Members for Care ManagementValue of Working High Cost Member Report (Y1Y2)

20

Commercial LOB 2006

Allowed >= $50K GROUP A

N = 10,194 (100%)

PMPM: $8,772PMPY: $105,258

Average MM: 11.09

IP PFO Rx $4,110 $4,196 $467 $49,316 $50,358 $5,608

Experience in 2005

Allowed >= $50K GROUP B

N = 1,969 (19%)

PMPM: $10,155PMPY: $121,857

Average MM: 11.60

IP PFO Rx $3,285 $6,082 $761 $39,426 $72,990 $9,131

?N = 8,225 (81%)

Eligible Members With < $50KGROUP C

N =6,651 (65%)

PMPM: $1,095PMPY: $13,134

Average MM: 11.14

MembersNot

EligibleN = 1,166 (11%)

Eligible MembersW/O Claims$N = 408 (5%)

N = 2,091,256

PMPY: $2,995

Identify & Stratify Members for Care ManagementValue of Working High Cost Member Report (Y2Y1)

21

Year 2004

Commercial LOB 2004N = 1,837,214PMPY: $2,836

Allowed >= $50K N = 7,404 (100%)

PMPM: $8,910PMPY: $ 106,921

Average MM: 10.94

Year 2005

Allowed >= $50KN = 1,635 (22%)

PMPM: $10,251PMPY: $ 123,006

Average MM: 11.47

Year 2006

Allowed >= $50KGROUP D N = 650 (9%)

PMPM: $9,493PMPY: $ 113,915

Average MM: 11.24

Identify & Stratify Members for Care ManagementValue of Working High Cost Member Report (Y1Y2Y3)

22

ETGCode ETG Description Allw

%TotalAllw

ETGCode ETG Description Allowed

% TotalAllw

553 Chronic Renal Failure, w ith ESRD $47,923,994 5.4 553 Chronic Renal Failure, w ith ESRD $38,761,827 16.1

721 Joint Degeneration, Local, w / Surgery $35,771,711 4.0 656 Malignant Neoplasm of Breast w /o Surgery $10,600,438 4.4

786 Other major Neonatal d/o perinatal origin $30,891,125 3.5 75 Non-Neoplastic Blood Disease, Major $9,977,285 4.1

73 Neoplastics Disorder Blood & Ly mph, Ex Leuk $30,658,775 3.4 73 Neoplastic Disorder Blood & Ly mph, Ex Leuk $9,880,412 4.1

260 Coronary Disease w /o AMI w / CABG $27,081,959 3.0 72 Leukemia w /o Splenectomy $7,787,074 3.2

655 Malignant Neoplasm Breast, w / Surgery not BMT$21,565,875 2.4 76 Non-Neoplastic Blood Disease, Minor $7,526,867 3.1

251 Coronary Disease w / AMI w /CABG $21,287,899 2.4 991 Orphan Drug Record $5,929,881 2.5

401 Malignant Pulmonary Neoplasm, w /o Surgery $20,113,568 2.2 401 Malignant Pulmonary Neoplasm, w /o Surgery $5,921,153 2.5

72 Leukemia w /o Splenectomy $19,282,495 2.2 478 Malignant Neoplasm Rectum/Anus, w /o Surgery$4,566,464 1.9

75 Non-Neoplastic Blood Disease, Major $17,920,993 2.0 721 Joint Degeneration, Local, w / Surgery $3,616,225 1.5

253 Coronary Disease w /o AMI w / Angioplasty $16,713,020 1.9 373 Bacterial Lung Infection w ith Comorbidity $3,494,225 1.4

477 Malignant Neoplasm Rectum/Anus w /Surgery $16,288,401 1.8 51 Other Metabolic Disorder $3,339,403 1.4

656 Malignant Neoplasm of Breast w /o Surgery $16,052,116 1.8 655 Malignant Neoplasm Breast, w / Surgery not BMT$3,310,015 1.4

262 Coronary Disease w /o AMI w /Angioplasty $15,814,419 1.8 810 Late Effects and Late Complications $3,206,696 1.3

373 Bacterial Lung Infection w ith Comorbidity $11,639,075 1.3 454 Malignant Neoplasm Intest/Abdom w /o Surgery$3,178,822 1.3

264 Coronary Disease w /o AMI w /Cardiac Cath $10,862,902 1.2 477 Malignant Neoplasm Rectum/Anus w /Surgery $2,985,750 1.2

153 Malignant Neoplasm of CNS w /Surgery $10,366,887 1.2 262 Coronary Disease w /o AMI w /Angioplasty $2,352,321 1.0

282 Cardiac Congenital Disorder w /Surgery $10,178,199 1.1 452 Inflam of Intestines/Abdomen w /o Surgery $2,293,327 1.0

76 Non-Neoplastic Blood Disease, Minor $9,999,538 1.1 282 Cardiac Congenital Disorder w /Surgery $2,103,403 0.9

162 Major Brain Trauma w /o Surgery $9,938,655 1.1 153 Malignant Neoplasm of CNS w /Surgery $2,011,666 0.8

Total For Top 20 ETGs $400,351,606 45.0 Total For Top 20 ETGs $132,843,254 55.0

Grand Total = $893,294,617 Grand Total = $241,542,404

GROUP B: >=$50K in 2005 and 2006 GROUP A: >=$50K in 2005

Commercial LOB: TOP 20 ETGs

Identify & Stratify Members for Care ManagementValue of Working High Cost Member Report: Cost Drivers

23

ETGCode ETG Description Allowed

%TotalAllw

ETGCode ETG Description Allowed

%TotalAllw

722 Joint Degeneration, Local, w /o Surgery $2,592,627 3.3 553 Chronic Renal Failure, w ith ESRD $20,649,142 23.2

73 Neoplastic Disorder Blood & Ly mph, Ex Leuk $2,297,356 2.9 75 Non-Neoplastic Blood Disease, Major $5,249,796 5.9

656 Malignant Neoplasm of Breast w /o Surgery $1,887,226 2.4 76 Non-Neoplastic Blood Disease, Minor $4,212,880 4.7

721 Joint Degeneration, Local, w / Surgery $1,873,126 2.4 656 Malignant Neoplasm of Breast w /o Surgery $4,192,427 4.7

401 Malignant Pulmonary Neoplasm, w /o Surgery $1,736,043 2.2 73 Neoplastic Disorder Blood & Ly mph, Ex Leuk $3,544,421 4.0

265 Ischemic Heart Disese, Ex , CHF w /o AMI $1,718,398 2.2 991 Orphan Drug Record $3,063,321 3.4

553 Chronic Renal Failure, w ith ESRD $1,589,758 2.0 72 Leukemia w /o splenectomy $2,571,613 2.9

655 Malignant Neoplasm Breast, w / Surgery not BMT$1,465,064 1.9 51 Other Metabolic Disorder $1,810,990 2.0

262 Coronary Disease w /o AMI w / Angioplasty $1,409,685 1.8 478 Malignant Neoplasm Rectum/Anus w /o Surgery$1,748,250 1.9

29 Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes w / Comorbidity $1,352,197 1.7 454 Malignant Neoplasm Intest/Abdom w /o Surgery$1,380,751 1.5

786 Other Major Neonatal D/O Perinatal Origin $1,194,070 1.5 373 Bacterial Lung Infection w ith Comorbidity $1,350,668 1.5

999 Orphan Record $1,145,019 1.5 401 Malignant Pulmonary Neoplasm $1,174,693 1.3

991 Orphan Drug Record $1,090,253 1.4 394 Emphy sema w ith Chronic Bronchitis $1,053,345 1.2

433 Inflammation of Esophagus w /o Surgery $1,018,298 1.3 262 Coronary Disease w /o AMI w /Angioplasty $985,902 1.1

160 Cereb Vasc Accident w /o Surgery $981,220 1.3 810 Late Effects and Late Complications $861,726 1.0

51 Other Metabolic Disorder $908,220 1.2 27 Insulin Dependent Diabetes w /Comorbidity $846,994 1.0

75 Non-Neoplastic Blood Disease Major $888,965 1.1 452 Inflam of Intestines/Abdomen w /o Surgery $754,833 0.9

47 Hy perlipidemia $887,798 1.1 280 Benign Hy pertension w /Comorbidity $723,403 0.8

72 Leukemia w /o Splenectomy $856,636 1.1 167 Hered/Degen Dis CNS w /o Surgery $708,984 0.8

253 Coronary Disease w /o AMI w / Angioplasty $792,093 1.0 266 Pulmonary Hear Disease w /o AMI $698,100 0.7

Total For Top 20 ETGs $27,684,052 35.0 Total For Top 20 ETGs $57,582,239 71.0

GROUP C: >=$50K in 2005 and <$50K in 2006 GROUP D: >=$50K in 2004, 2005 and 2006

Grand Total = $78,098,373 Grand Total = $81,451,176

Commercial LOB: TOP 20 ETGs

Identify & Stratify Members for Care ManagementValue of Working High Cost Member Report: Cost Drivers

24

• Why?

• 1) To reliably identify higher cost, highly impactable members

• 2) To enhance prioritization of members for nurse-intervention management

• How?• Use predictive output from MEDai

• Select key MEDai measures to construct a composite score

• Use the composite score as an index to stratify members

Focus on members with the highest index scoresFocus on members with the highest index scores

Identify & Stratify Members for Care ManagementDeveloping a Stratification Index (SI)

25

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0 10 80-85 86-90 91-95 96-100

Chronic Impact Level

Perc

ent o

f Mem

bers

High Index ScoresModerate Index ScoresLow Index Scores

Validating SI ScoreChronic & Acute Impact: Break Down by SI Score

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0-50 51-70 71-85 86-95 96-100

Acute Index Level

Perc

ent o

f Mem

bers

High Index ScoresModerate Index ScoresLow Index Scores

26

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1 - 2 3 - 4 > = 5

Number of Chronic Gaps

Perc

ent o

f Mem

bers High Index Scores

Moderate Index ScoresLow Index Scores

Validating SI Score Chronic & Preventative Gaps: Break Down by SI Score

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

0 1 - 2 > = 3

Number of Preventative Gaps

Perc

ent o

f Mem

bers High Index Scores

Moderate Index ScoresLow Index Scores

27

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

$0-999 $1000-4999 $5000-9999 $10000-24999

>$25000

Forecasted Cost Level

Perc

ent o

f Mem

bers

High Index ScoresModerate Index ScoresLow Index Scores

Validating SI Score Forecasted Cost Risk: Break Down by SI Score

28

• Movers are members who are likely to make the transition from low or moderate to high risk

• Movers can be identified by comparing current vs. forecasted cost risk level

• if a member’s current cost is less than $1,000 (Risk Level I) and is predicted to cost more than $25,000 (Risk Level V)

• Do movers have higher index scores?

Validating SI Score Mover Identification

29

Current Risk Level

Forecasted Risk Level Frequency Mean Index

ScoreI II 430,312 4.52I III 11,370 9.87I IV 451 12.75I V 2 11.00II III 96,352 10.26II IV 7,737 13.03II V 51 13.04III IV 22,492 13.47III V 225 13.95IV V 2,142 14.85

Validating SI Score Index Scores for Movers

30

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Commercial LOB 10/2005

High Scores: >=11(10.2%)

Moderate Scores: 6-10(18.4%)

Low Scores: <=5(71.4%)

Validating SI Score Distribution of Index Scores

31

Segmentation Risk Level Management Type

Healthy Group; Worried Well

Low

Lifestyle/Health

Counseling

Chronically Ill Moderate Refer to Care Coordination Unit

Catastrophic

High

Refer to Catastrophic Case Management

Care Management Challenges: Triage & Intervene Members for Care Management NeedsCare Management Model

32

• Information on disease/condition– Web resources– Pamphlets– Telephonic health library– 24/7 Nurse Line– HRA/PHR

• Encouragement to take more active role/accountability

Care Management ModelLifestyle/Health Counseling for Healthy and Worried Well

33

• Telephonic coordination with members and their providers

• Ensures appropriate treatments and pharmaceuticals

• Five different programs included in this model

Care Management ModelCare Coordination for Chronically Ill

34

• Pharmacy Care Management

• Emergency Room (ER) Visits Mgmt.

• Transition of Care

• Condition Specific Care Coordination

• Disease Management

Care Management ModelCare Coordination Programs

35

• Directed to members with– Terminal illness (HOPE)– Major trauma– Cognitive/physical disability– High-risk condition– Complicated care needs

• Systematic process of assessing, planning, coordinating, implementing, and evaluation of care

Care Management ModelCatastrophic Case Management

36

Triage & Intervene Members for Care Management Needs Implementation

• Predictive modeling using– MEDai, DCG, ETG

• Rolling 12 months DCG explanation prospective model

• ETG cost to supplement MEDai prediction • Developed SQL database containing MEDai, DCG,

and ETG information• Improved processes/workflow• Easy and continuous access• Better documentation

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

Triage & Intervene Members for Care Management Needs Implementation: Future Enhancements

• Accreditation Analytics • Member non-compliance for HEDIS measures• Satisfaction profile

• Geo-spatial Analytics (imputed race, vicinity to Centers of Excellence (COE) or efficient/quality providers)

• Data Mining Analytics• Probability of engagement, segmentation profile

• Psychosocial Profile

• Speech Analytics

• Indirect Cost Profile

45

• Basic research problem: measuring what would have happened vs. what actually happened

• Methodologies:• Randomized Control Group• Population-Based Pre-Post Methodology• Predictive Modeling• Control Group Matching • Combination

Care Management Challenges: Evaluate Care Management Interventions

46

Predictive Modeling with Inflation FactorsYr1 Yr2

Net Savings 12,606$ 72,811$ ROI 1.43 3.72

Group's Inflation Factor 5% 7%

CM Mbrs Actual PMPM 574$ 542$ CM Mbrs Predictive Modeling PMPM 629$ 638$ Inflated CM Mbrs Predictive Modeling PMPM 659$ 682$

CM Savings PMPM 85$

140$

Total CM Savings 42,005$ 99,560$ Admin Cost 29,399$ 26,749$

Evaluate Care Management InterventionsPredictive Modeling

47

Predictive Modeling w/Inflation Factors and AdjustmentsYr1 Yr2

Non CM Mbrs Actual PMPM 225$ 217$ Non CM Mbrs PMPM Predictive Modeling 205$ 232$ Inflation Adjusted Non CM Mbrs PMPM Predictive Modeling 214$ 248$ Adjustment for Actual to Predictive Modeling 5% -13%

CM Mbrs Actual PMPM 574$ 542$ CM Mbrs Predictive Modeling PMPM 629$ 638$ Inflated CM Mbrs Predictive Modeling PMPM 659$ 682$ Adjusted Predictive Model 692$ 597$

Adjusted CM Savings PMPM $ 117 $ 55 Adjusted CM Savings $ 57,819 $ 39,113 Admin Cost 29,399 26,749$$

Adjusted Net Savings 28,296$ 12,364$ Adjusted ROI 1.96 1.46

Evaluate Care Management InterventionsPredictive Modeling w/Adjustments

48

Evaluate Care Management InterventionsTotal Cost Approach

Direct CostsDirect Costs by SI Score – 2007 Commercial Subscribers

Median 2007 Direct Costs by SI Score - Commercial Subscribers Enrolled in 2007

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20SI Score

Num

ber o

f Sub

scrib

ers

$0

$6,000

$12,000

$18,000

$24,000

$30,000

$36,000

Med

ian

Dire

ct C

osts

Number of Subscribers Median 2007 Direct $

Percent of Direct Costs & Commercial Subscribers by SI Score - Subscribers Enrolled in 2007

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20SI Score

% of Total Subscribers % of Direct $ in 2007

80% of Members 20% of Members

49

Evaluate Care Management InterventionsTotal Cost Approach

Indirect CostsIndirect Costs by SI Score – 2007 Commercial Subscribers

Median 2007 Indirect Costs by SI Score - Commercial Subscribers Enrolled in 2007

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20SI Score

Num

ber o

f Sub

scrib

ers

$0

$4,000

$8,000

$12,000

$16,000

$20,000

Med

ian

Indi

rect

Cos

ts

Number of Subscribers Median 2007 Indirect $

Percent of Indirect Costs & Commercial Subscribers by SI Score Subscribers Enrolled in 2007

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20SI Score

% of Total Subscribers % of Indirect $ in 2007

80% of Members 20% of Members

50

Evaluate Care Management InterventionsTotal Cost Approach

Total CostsTotal Costs by SI Score – 2007 Commercial Subscribers

Median 2007 Total Healthcare Costs by SI Score - Commercial Subscribers Enrolled in 2007

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20SI Score

Num

ber o

f Sub

scrib

ers

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000

Med

ian

Tota

l Hea

lthca

re C

osts

Number of Subscribers Median 2007 THC $

Percent of Total Healthcare Costs & Commercial Subscribers by SI Score - Subscribers Enrolled in 2007

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20SI Score

% of Total Subscribers % of THC $ in 2007

80% of Members 20% of Members

51

Evaluate Care Management InterventionsTotal Cost Approach

-$14,000

-$12,000

-$10,000

-$8,000

-$6,000

-$4,000

-$2,000

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

$14,000

-10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

EBI Score Change From December 2006 to 2007

Median Change in Indirect $ (06 vs. 07)Median Change in Direct $ (06 vs. 07)

Change in SI Score vs. Change in Median THC Change in SI Score vs. Change in Median THC for Commercial Subscribers in 2006 & 2007for Commercial Subscribers in 2006 & 2007

SI Score Reduced

SI Score Increased

Each 1 point reduction in Score = $775 in THC savings PMPY

Each 1 point increase in Score = $750 THC increase PMPY

Med

ian

Chan

ge in

Co

sts

SI Score Change From December 2006 to 2007

52

Conclusions

• More scientific/standardized approach• Able to touch more lives efficiently• Well accepted by our care managers• PM approach has helped

– Streamline our processes– Better manage case managers case load

• Provide “Peace of Mind” to our members and clients