Revue Bilan 2011 Eng

THE ASSESSMENT JOURNALOF THE WE LOVE GREEN

FESTIVAL 2011

P3 -­ VENUES & PROGRAMMATION

P5 -­ COMMITTED FESTIVAL

P6 -­ SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS

P10 -­ INVOLVED PARTNERS

P13 -­ POST FESTIVAL ASSESSMENT

P20 -­ PUBLICS SURVEY

P23 -­ SYNTHESIS & EXCERPTSOF CARBONE FOOTPRINT

P25 -­ PORFOLIO

P33 -­ ARTISTS

P44 -­ THE MOVIE

P45 -­ PRESS REVIEW

P54 -­ VERBATIM

P55 -­ THREE EXECUTIVE PRODUCERSBEHIND THE SCENES

P56 -­ THE TEAM

-­

-­

-­

-­

-­

SUMMARY

Symbol of a preserved nature in the city, the Parc de Bagatelle is the ideal bower

tival in Paris. Ecstatic pop, eccentric folk, bucolic electro, a weekend of music you can dance to, sing on or breathe in.

PARK OF BAGATELLE, PARIS

-­

-­

-­

VENUES &PROGRAMMATION

PETER DOHERTYMETRONOMYSELAH SUEKRUDER & DORFMEISTEROF MONTREALCONNAN MOCKASINPIERS FACCINISOKODJ KOZE SUPERPITCHERPILOOSKI

GREEN ROOM SESSION

TOM ARTHUSMARIE MARIEVIOLAINE SHUTZJE KIFFE MES COPS

COMMITTEDFESTIVAL

We Love Green, it is a musical festival but above anything else it is a strong concept: an event deeply caring about mastering its environmental and societal impact, and trying to heighten public awareness of environmental respect.

-­-­

-­

-­-­

AMBITIOUS GOALS/OBJECTIVES

-­

DETERMINING LINE OF CONDUCT

-­

-­

-­

STRATEGIC CHOICES

-­

-­

-­

-­

SUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENT

ACTION

of events, We Love Green displayed on

nable development solutions. Those innovations were distributed on four major poles of the event: recycled/recyclable stage design, green energy, 100% organic catering (fair trade and/or local) and consciousness raising.

STAGE DESIGN

— Recycled/recyclable

-­

— Workshop

-­

— Structures-­

-­

ENERGY

— We Love Green Power™-­

-­-­

-­

2011 Heavant eco-­design prize, event professio-­nal show

— No Gas-­

CONSCIOUSNESS RAISING

Upstream

— SD Strategy/Commitments-­

*Sustainable Development

— Teams and providers

-­

-­

During the event

-­

-­

After the event

-­

LIMITS

-­

-­

INVOLVEDPARTNERS

Convinced by the sustainable development process engaged by We Love Green, the partners took part in the festival’s deployment creating a synergy between We Love Green initiatives and

-­

-­

-­

-­

-­

-­

-­

ASSESSMENT

-­

-­

I. REDUCE THE WLG ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINT

LIMITS 2012

Festival’s carbon footprint by Ekodev and compensation by a ‘Pur Projet’ labelled association

– See limits and results in ‘Synthesis and excerpt of car-­bon footprint’ p23– From the detailed analysis of the food’s carbon footprint (food transport, packaging,

-­sons for next year– The energetic consumption impact remains relatively low and this result will be reinforced for the second edition with a development of solar power

-­

Energy– Some halogen lightsEx: public circulation balloons

-­

-­

-­

-­ply more spaces on the festival

-­

Local supplying– Not enough local contractors:

-­

-­

-­

– No electric or hybrid vehicles for the festival production teams : no renter has this kind of pro-­duct in his stock (besides Hertz with a 900 € Class S for the week-­end)– Shuttles did not work on GPL or electricity (no offer)– complex accessibility to the site which involved a great number of vehicles to transport material : articulated lorries + platform trucks + golf carts– No possibility to set a short-­lived Vélib terminal up in less

stipulated in Decaux-­Mairie de Paris contract

promotion about bike circula-­tion towards the festivalgoers

-­-­

-­-­

-­

– Not enough registrations on the festival web platform dedi-­cated to car-­sharing, in spite of

September– Lack of upstream communi-­cation about the very existence of this platform

festival site and website

– -­

– – Neither RATP nor Veolia have been able to provide ‘clean’ shuttles

– Incomplete communication on the site

-­

-­

-­

LIMITS 2012

LIMITS 2012

Reduction at the source–

-­

– Production teams were real-­ly thirsty and asked for water bottles because cups were not handy– Flaws in the water distribution set up to the teams during as-­sembly and dismantling

-­

-­

-­

-­

-­-­

-­

– Troubles to attract attention from Eco-­Emballages for colla-­boration– No compost has been made:

France with Urban Cleaning Ser-­

– No accurate sorting weigh (lack of comprehension and communication with Paris town hall services -­ no weighing ma-­chine on the city’s trucks)– Necessity to improve com-­munication and comprehen-­sion with the sorting and waste consciousness raising team (connexions or other contrac-­

-­mum collaboration– Identify at the very moment of the collection the appropriate material and the collection source for an optimum fabrica-­tion of every stage elements– Late delivery of pocket-­ash-­trays by the contractor, bad visibility of this tool on the festival

-­

-­

-­

-­

-­

-­

-­-­

-­

LIMITS 2012

– -­

-­

– -­

– – –

– -­

– on site (printed apart from the Inrockuptibles) little used be-­cause non practical– Flyers distribution at the en-­trance by other events -­ wastes on the highway– No ‘recycled paper’ mention on some documents

–

– -­

–

–

– -­

-­

– No possibility for festivalgoers to wash their hands on site– wastes brought to Charentes

-­

LIMITS 2012

6.RESPONSIBLE PURCHASE LIMITS 2012

-­

-­

– Suppliers charter not signed upstream -­

-­

-­

-­

II. COMMUNICATION AND CONSCIOUSNESS RAISING

LIMITS 2012

-­

-­

-­

– WLG charter not distributed to all the teams– the festival : no upstream gene-­ral reunion but constant aware-­ness raising of the contractors and teams– No English version charter dis-­played in the dressing rooms

-­-­

-­

2.FESTIVALGOERS CONSCI LIMITS 2012

-­

-­

-­

-­

– Lack of information on site about We Love Green actions:

– Limited access of We Love Green actions information on the website

-­-­

-­-­

III. DISPLAY A RESPECTFUL AND MOTIVATING SOCIAL POLICY

1.TEAMS DEEPLY LIMITS 2012

-­ – Huge pressure on the whole -­

cy solutions– Lack of regular meetings with team leaders during different phases: preparation, assembly,

2012

2.GOOD WORK CONDI LIMITS 2012

-­ – Huge pressure due to the late festival assembly – Lack of anticipation due to late funding– – Teams spread in different of-­

– Unusual venue required ca-­pacity for adaptation

-­

3. RESPECT OF VOLUNTA LIMITS 2012

-­-­

-­

– -­taries because of their late arri-­val– Lack of anticipation to inform voluntaries -­

-­

IV. INNOVATE IN THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT FIELD

2011 LIMITS 2012

– indicators– Generator set only able to supply the partners and ONG Tipi +25% of stage lighting– LEDD creation: Free Exchange of Sustainable Development

-­-­

-­

-­

V. SOCIETAL ROLE RESPONSABILITY

2011 LIMITS 2012

-­

-­

-­

– Lack of animation for children– Minimum realized for health, disabled person welcome and diversity– No feedback on reduced rate tickets with Imagin-­R and Fnac– Limited number of emerging and local artists

-­

-­

-­

-­-­

PUBLICS SURVEYS

Men e 3,28%

1,64%

5,74%

16,39%

26,23%

37,70%

9,02%

45-49 an

40-44 an

35-39 an

30-34 an

25-29 an

20-24 an

15-19 an

3,28%

3,28%

30,33%

63,11%

-­

-­

no

no

8,13%

34,15%

10,57%

13,82%

4,07%

24,39%

No

No

NoNo

During the festival did you go to the association stands? If the answer is yes, which ones?

Do you think the sustainable development process is a relevant involvement for a festival?

Why?

– – –

– – – – –

– – – – – – – – –

What do you expect from WLG SD process? Do you think of other actions to set up? (Open question)

– – -­

– – – – – – – – – – – – – –

– – – – – –

BIO CULTURE

EAU DE PARIS

CAR-­SHARING

GOOD PLANET

WWF

No

19,47%

26,32%

8,95%

17,89%

27,37%

No

SYNTHESIS AND EXCERPTS OF CARBONE FOOTPRINT

Our process followed the basis of Carbon Footprint ADEME method calculating the

/ stands, material and decoration provision / communication media / immobilisation / necessary energy for the good progress of the event / wastes

Festival general data

WE LOVE GREEN

Festivalgoers emissions

5 kg CO2 that is to say 1.35 kg equivalent carbon

Festival total emissions

50 tons CO2 that is to say 13.5 kg equivalent carbon

-­

POST DISTRIBUTION

TOTAL

*inputs : all the economic ressources used in a pro-­duction process

-­PORT TYPE

CARBON OFFSETTING

-­

-­

-­

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

Kg eq C

Kg eq CO 2

VERBATIM

-­-­-­

-­

EAU DE PARIS · Mathieu Souquière-­

-­

MTV · Mathias Abiker & David Boulakia

SPOTIFY · Sophie Cazaux

-­

ARTE · H. Angelina Medori

COURRIER INTERNATIONAL · Sophie Nezet & Mathilde Melot

-­

FONDATION GOODPLANET · Arnaud Hiltzer-­

A GREENER FESTIVAL · Penny Mellor

THREE EXECUTIVEPRODUCERS

BEHIND THE SCENES

-­-­

www.because.tv

-­

www.corida.fr

-­

-­

-­

www.weloveart.net

TEAM

Editor At Large

Artistic Director

Sustainable development expert

Executive Producer

Mission delegate

Production

Musical artist director

Technic

Administrative

Bars director

Voluntaries director

Web

Interns-­

Visual identity

Photos

Media relation

Press relation

Partnerships / Sponsors

01 53 21 53 21

thank you to the designers :

They also participated in the adventure-­

-­

-­

Association We Love Green

www.welovegreen.fr