View
6
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Research on Effectiveness & LSI ProfilesThe Case for Blue
Ideal LSI Profile
Source: Human Synergistics Research Data
Most Effective Navy Leadership (source: NLDW collated data Jan-Sep 2010)
Effective Navy Leadership
Least Effective Navy Leadership (source: NLDW collated data Jan-Sep 2010)
Effective Navy Leadership
Navy most effective profile
Effectiveness
Navy least effective profile
(source: NLDW collated data Jan-Sep 2010)
Sample LSI Profiles
A Very Effective CEO
• #4 to #1 (rev & assets).
• #1 in customer service.
• World benchmark.
• ‘Before his time’ strategy development.• Major contribution to Government policy.
Example Managers
A Very Ineffective CEO
❥ Decline in revenue growth.
❥ Key executives went to the competitors.
❥ Decline in service quality.
❥ Decline in share price.
❥ Being positioned for sale.
Example Managers
How does this compare with your least effective Navy Leader?
Principal of SchoolWinner of Excellence Award
Example Managers
Example Managers
Director: Health Management
Company experiencing 50% staff turnover
Example Managers
Male supervisor with high blood pressure
Example Managers
54 year old Male who has had 5 ulcers
Summary PerceptionsWhat the Research tells us…
■ Relate the outcomes to the circumplex styles.
■ What makes some people effective?
■ Top % in outcomes.
■ Bottom % in outcomes.
■ Motivator for change.
Outcomes - Summary Perceptions
Effectiveness
MarginalExcellentTop 10%: 7,000 Bottom 10%: 7,000
As rated by OthersTop 10% for this Question
Avg. Response = 6.52
As rated by OthersBottom 10% for this Question
Avg. Response = 4.03
Australian & NZ LSI Data 1994 - Present
Quality of Work Relationships
Excellent PoorTop 10%: 7,000 Bottom 10%: 7,000
As rated by OthersTop 10% for this Question
Avg. Response = 6.65
As rated by OthersBottom 10% for this Question
Avg. Response = 3.96
Australian & NZ LSI Data 1994 - Present
Ability to Handle Stress
At ease TenseTop 10%: 7,000 Bottom 10%: 7,000
As rated by OthersBottom 10% for this Question
Avg. Response = 5.42
As rated by OthersTop 10% for this Question
Avg. Response = 2.15
Australian & NZ LSI Data 1994 - Present
Management of Time
PoorlyEffectivelyTop 10%: 7,000 Bottom 10%: 7,000
As rated by OthersTop 10% for this Question
Avg. Response = 6.47
As rated by OthersBottom 10% for this Question
Avg. Response = 3.78
Australian & NZ LSI Data 1994 - Present
Factor■ Managerial Effectiveness
■ Quality of Interpersonal Relations
■ Job Satisfaction
■ Psychological/Physiological Health
■ Problem-Solving Effectiveness
■ Interest in Self Improvement
■ Organisational Level
■ Salary
Aggressive/Aggressive/DefensiveDefensive
0
--
--
--
-
--
+
+
ConstructiveConstructive
++
++
++
++
+
++
+
0
Passive/Defensive
0
+
--
-
-
+
--
--
+ indicates positive significant relationship0 indicates non-significant relationship
- indicates negative significant relationship
Key:
Outcomes associated with LSI
Recommended