View
221
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
1/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 1
1.0 ABSTRACT
In this project, we are considering the evolution of a system of population
dynamics of prey and predator of two types of species. There are sheep as a prey and
coyote as a predator. This model will described by Lotka-Volterra Population Growth
Model. By using the Pplan8 and ODEsolve of Math lab, we can determine the graph and
the nature of stability of each model that we have modified. Jacobian matrix is used in
order to determine the nature of stability of critical point for each model. Based on the
result, the nature of stability for our basic model is stable centre and unstable saddle
point. On the other side, there are only three types of nature of stability for each model
that we have modified, which are unstable spiral, unstable saddle point and stable centre.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
2/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 2
2.0 INTRODUCTION
This project is about prey and predator model which the coyote as the predator and the
sheep as the prey. The Coyote is a canines species that smaller than wolves. It is also
known as prairie wolves, brush wolves or American jackal. Nowadays, it can be found at
the big cities such as Los Angeles and North America. The coyote once lived primarily in
open grassland and deserts, but now roam the continent's forests and mountains.
Coyotes are fearsome in the field where they enjoy keen vision and a strong sense
of smell. They can run up to 40 miles (64 kilometers) an hour. In the fall and winter, they
form packs for more effective hunting. In spring, females den and give birth to litters of
three to twelve pups. Both parents feed and protect their young and their territory. By the
following fall, the pups are able to hunt on their own. Coyotes usually breed only once a
year and 6 pups per birth in average. Coyote can live a maximum of 10 years in the wild
and 18 years in captivity.
The coyote is versatile feeders. Sometimes, it is labeled as carnivores but more
often as omnivores. They will eat almost anything. They hunt animals such as sheep,
rabbits, rodents, and frogs. They also happily dine on plants and fruits. Presently, the
coyote is the most abundant livestock predators in western North America, causing the
majority of sheep, goat and cattle died.When attacking adult sheep or goats, coyotes will
bite the throat just behind the jaw and below the ear, and they will bite the skull and
spinal regions when attacking smaller prey, such as young lambs.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
3/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 3
Meanwhile, sheeps are relatively small ruminants, usually with a crimped hair
called wool and often with horns forming a lateral spiral. Sheep
are herbivorous mammals. Ram is a male sheep while a female sheep is called a ewe.
Sheep are descended from the wild mouflon of Europe and Asia. The average life
expectancy of a sheep is 10 to 12 years, though some sheep may live as long as 20 years.
In the United States, over one third of sheep deaths in 2004 were caused by predation.
Birth rate for sheep is one to three times in a year and they can breed 3 lambs once.
Sheep have good hearing, and are sensitive to noise. More than that, sheep can see
behind themselves without turning their heads because it is have horizontal slit-shaped
pupils with visual fields of approximately 270 to 320. Sheep have little ability to defend
themselves, compared with other species. Even if sheep survive an attack, they may die
from their injuries or simply from panic because sheep are timid, nervous and easily
frightened animals and for the most part defenseless against predators like coyotes and
wild dogs. Usually, sheep will flock together in large numbers in order to survive and to
run away from predators. In addition, sheep do not like to walk in water or move through
narrow openings. They prefer to move into the wind and uphill than down wind and
downhill. (Wanda Embar (2007)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimp_(wool)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laterallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiralhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbivoroushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mouflonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mouflonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbivoroushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiralhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laterallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimp_(wool)7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
4/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 4
3.0 OBJECTIVE
a. To help the shepherd to make sure that the sheep will not get extinct.
b. To investigate the effect of sheep in the presence of coyote.
c. To determine the nature of stability of population of sheep and coyote.
d. To predict the population of sheep and coyote in 10 years.
4.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
The research of predator and prey also had been done at University of Colorado
Boulder in 2012. He states that the Lotka-Volterra model of prey and predator interaction
is essentially a kinetic model. He also uses sheep as a prey while coyote is the predator.
His basic Lotka Volterra model use time in day unit. Polymath program is used in order
to determine the nature of stability of his model. The graph of sheep and coyote
population versus time is periodic and isolate. The result shows that when he decreases
the initial population of coyote from the basic model, there is a larger isolation of sheep
population. It means that when the population coyote is decrease, the population of sheep
will increase. Hence, there is inversely proportional relation between sheep and coyote
population.Learn Cheme (2012).
Takeuchi Y. et al. (2005), have done a research with consider the evolution of a
system composed of two predatorprey deterministic systems described by Lotka
Volterra equations in random environment. They are proved that by using the influence of
telegraph noise, all positive trajectories always go out from any compact set of intR2+
with probability one if two rest points of the two systems do not coincide. They found
that in case where they have the rest point in common, the trajectory either converges to
the rest point or leaves from any compact set of intR2+. The system is neither permanent
nor dissipative if there is escape of the trajectories from any compact set.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
5/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 5
5.0 ANALYSIS
Beals M. et al. (1999) stated that the Lotka-Volterra model is composed of a pair
of differential equations that describe predator-prey dynamics in their simplest case
consist of one predator population and one prey population. It was developed
independently by Alfred Lotka and Vito Volterra in the 1920's, and is characterized by
oscillations in the population size of both predator and prey, with the peak of the
predator's oscillation lagging slightly behind the peak of the prey's oscillation.
Predators and prey can influence one another's evolution. There are several simplifying
assumptions for this model:
(a)The prey population will grow exponentially when the predator is absent
(b) The predator population will starve in the absence of the prey population (as
opposed to switching to another type of prey)
(c)Predators can consume infinite quantities of prey
(d)There is no environmental complexity (in other words, both populations are
moving randomly through a homogeneous environment).
Our variable is x, the number of sheep at time t, and y, the number of coyote at
time t. We assume that t is in a day. First assumption, we assume that when the coyote is
absent, the sheep population will increase their numbers about 2.19% by calculating their
growth rate(8/year). We model the growth of the sheep by the differential equation.
when y=0
Then, we assume that in the absence of the sheep, the coyote will starve and lead
to death. The rate of cheetah population is declining about 0.03% by calculating the rate
of their life expectancy. Life span for a coyote is around 10 years(1/3650). Hence, the
differential equation will be
when x=0
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
6/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 6
If the sheep and coyote at the same area it is probably that the rate of sheep killed
by the coyote is proportional to the number of sheep and proportional to the number
coyote. If there are plenty of sheep, the population of the coyote will increase rapidly
because they get enough food. The differential equation for sheep is
A research found that the proportion of sheep population which killed by one
coyote at one time is 0.00012. Similarly, the differential equation for coyote is
The constant 0.0000024 (0.00012*0.02) represent the proportion of newborn
coyote in coyote population due to food value of one sheep multiply with proportion of
sheep population which killed by one coyote at one time
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
7/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 7
6.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION6.1 Basic Model
x = 0.0219x (0.00012) xy
y= -0.0003y + (0.0000024) xy
x = 2000, y = 50
At t=0, the initial population of sheep is 2000 and the initial of coyote is
50. The growth rate of sheep is increase and also the growth rate of coyote is
increase because they have a lot of source of food. When the population of coyote
increases at t= 200days, the population of sheep will decrease and vice versa. This
happen periodically every 7000days.In this case, we assume both species does not
have any immigration or emigration. This is called basic Lotka Volterra model.
As we want to see clearer the behavior of this model, through phase portrait, we
can know the behavior of the model shown below.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
8/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 8
The phase portrait shows that there are two criticals point in this basic
model. First critical point is (125,183) and it shows that the behavior of the model
is stable center. This behavior shows that the periodically in the system like in the
explanation of graph above. This shows that the coexistence for both species. If
the initial number of populations if sufficiently close to the equilibrium point then
the interaction of sheep and coyote will remain at 125 and the populations of
coyote at 183. The second points is unstable saddle point at (0, 0) where its show
no life at all at this equilibrium point. The behavior of the phase diagram also
shows that the trajectories moving towards equilibrium and then depart from it. If
the initial value is close to (0, 0) equilibrium point, then this equilibrium
correspond to a state of coexistence where theoretically, the population of both of
sheep and coyote remain extinct forever.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
9/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 9
6.2 Modify value of initial populations
x = 3500, y = 250
x = 0.0219x (0.00012) xy
y= -0.0003y + (0.0000024)xy
The initial population is modifying for sheep is 3500 while for coyote is
250. As we can see from the graph above, at t=0, the population of sheep is higher
than coyote. Since sheep is the main source of food for coyote, when the sheep
population is increased, the population of coyote also increases because the
growth of rate for coyote also increases. This is due to the sufficient of food
resources. Since the population of predator increase, the population of sheep
decrease and become increase again at t= 6000days .this situation is periodically
happen in this system. Compare to the previous when initial population for sheep
is 2500 and the population of the coyote is 50, the sheep population will increase
at 7000 days which is 1000days later than modify initial model. This proves that
the initial population of the model may affect the time of species to increase or
decrease. It also important because we can know either that species will go extinct
or coexistence based on the initial population.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
10/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 10
6.3 One of the species is affected
i) Sheep is affecteda) Assuming that constant number of population is depleted
x= 0.0219x 0.00012 xy- 0.06
y= - 0.0003y + 0.0000024 xy
We assume that if the shepherd sold his sheep 25 per year, then
= 0.06 per day.
As we can see, the initial of sheep is 2000 and 50 of coyote but when
sheep is sold 25 per year, the population of sheep is decreased and the population
of coyote also decreased. This is happen because the source of food for coyote isstart to depleted then coyote do not have source of food and it will affected the
growth rate of coyote. The sheep population is start to decrease and still remain at
the population as the time goes.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
11/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 11
As we can see, there coexistence of both species at critical point
(125,178), the trajectories of direction field is moving toward to the equilibrium
point. This explains that sheep will coexist at 125 and coyote will coexist at 178
and the population size remains at this level indefinitely. The other point is at
critical point (3, 0) and this is saddle point. The trajectories moving toward
critical point and then depart from it. This explains if the initial number of sheep
and coyote are sufficiently close to (3,0), then the interaction process will
ultimately lead to survival of sheep at 3 and the extinction of coyote.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
12/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 12
b) Assuming that constant proportion of the population is depletedx= 0.0219x 0.00012 xy- 0.001x
y= - 0.0003y + 0.0000024 xy
In this case we assume 0.1% of the sheep population will depleted at that
time due to the rate of selling of sheep.
In this case, during t=0, the initial population of sheep is 2000 and the
population of coyote is 50. At the first, the population of sheep is increased and
the population of coyote also increases because coyote got more food. This will
lead to coyotes rate of birth increase. But when the population of sheep increases,
the sheep population will decrease. As the sheep population is decrease, source of
food for coyote is also decrease then population of coyote also decrease. Due to
the decrease of coyote population, the sheep population will increase. This phase
was happening periodically in 7000 days interval.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
13/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 13
From the above phase portrait, we have two critical points. First is at
(125,174) is a stable center. Thus it is stable. All trajectories approach around the
equilibrium. This equilibrium point corresponds to a state periodic and
coexistence of both species. Theoretically, the population of both sheep and
coyote remain at (125,174) forever. The second critical point (0, 0) is a saddle
point. Thus it is unstable. All trajectories nearby approach this equilibrium and
then depart from it. This equilibrium point correspond to a state of coexistence
where the population of sheep and coyote will remain at (0, 0) if the initial value
closed to this equilibrium point.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
14/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 14
ii) Coyote is affecteda) Assuming that constant number of population is depleted
x= 0.0219x0.00012 xy
y= - 0.0003y + 0.0000024 xy0.0274
We assume that 10 coyote is haunted per year.
= 0.0274
At initial, the population of sheep is 2000 and the population of coyote is
50. From the first 500 days, we can see that since the population of sheep is
higher. The population of coyote also start to increase at t= 125 days. At t =
250days, the population of coyote is 500 and at that time the population of sheep
also decrease. The source of food for coyote is decrease so the population of
coyote also decreases.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
15/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 15
From the above phase portrait we have one critical point. This critical
point (188, a83) is an unstable period. All trajectories will move from the center
of critical point and move to outside. This equilibrium point corresponds to a state
of coexistence for both species. The population size remains at (188,183) level
indefinitely. The population size for sheep will remain at 188 and the coyote
population will remain at 183.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
16/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 16
b) Assuming that constant proportion of the population is depletedx= 0.0219x 0.00012 xy
y= - 0.0003y + 0.0000024 xy0.001y
We are assume that 0.001 rate of death of coyote per year.
At t=0, the population of sheep is 2000 and the population of coyote is 50.
The population of sheep increase up to 7800 and at t=125 days, the population of
coyote also start increase. This is due to the increase of source of food, so the
coyotes rate ofgrowth rate will also increase. At t= 250 days, the population of
coyote is 500 but the population of sheep also decrease. As the population of
sheep decrease the population of coyote also decrease because lack of food
source. At t=2000 days, the population of sheep become increase again and this is
periodically every 2000 days
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
17/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 17
From phase potrait, we have two criticals point. First is (542,183) is an
unstable center. All trajectories periodic and its shows that the coexistence of both
species. The sheep is 542 and the coyote is 183 . the population size remains at
this level forever. The second critical point is (0, 0) is unstable saddle point. All
trajectories nearby approach this equilibrium and then depart from it. This
equilibrium point correspond to a state of coexistence where theoretically, the
population of both sheep and coyote remain at (0, 0) forever if the initial its closed
to this critical point.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
18/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 18
6.4 Both of Sheep and Coyote are Affected
i) Sheep and coyote affected by constant number.
x= 0.0219x 0.00012 xy 0.06
y= - 0.0003y + 0.0000024 xy 0.0274
The model for this graph are affected when 25 sheep are going to be
sell each year while the 10 of coyotes die each year due to hunt . The graph
above shows the population of sheep increases and decreases drastically from
day zero to day 250 but decrease slowly after that. The population of coyote
also increases slowly until day 250 but then decrease slowly. The populations
of these two species are look to be constant for a long period which means
they are coexist for a certain time period. Although, the populations are not
look like to be constant or coexist after day 3250. They are look to be extinct.
This is proven by the nature stability of its critical point or equilibrium point.At point (188, 180) all trajectories in the neighborhood of the fixed point
spiral away from the fixed point with ever increasing radius. This show the
system is unstable and behaves as an unstable oscillator.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
19/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 19
The nature of this stability can be visualized as a vector tracing a
spiral away from the fixed point (a). The plot of response with time of this
situation would look sinusoidal with ever-increasing amplitude (b), as shown
below.
(a)
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
20/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 20
(b)
This situation is undesirable when attempting to control the
population of sheep and coyote. This is because if there is a change in the
process, arising from the process itself or from an external disturbance, the
system itself will not go back to steady state which means it show that astime goes the population will extinct. By looking to this result, we actually
can help the shepherd to estimate their population of sheep each time. The
model can help them to know what they should do or when they should put
additional sheep to the cage to make the population of sheep remain exist and
their business will not end.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
21/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 21
ii) Sheep and coyote affected by constant proportion.
x= 0.0219x 0.00012 xy 0.06
y= - 0.0003y + 0.0000024 xy 0.0274
The model for this graph are affected when assuming around 0.1
percent of sheep and coyotes population are going to be die each time. The
graph above shows the population of these two species are periodic and the
pattern periodic every 2000 days. This graph is look like the basic graph but
the different is the pattern periodic for basic model is every 6000 to 7000
days and the maximum number that sheep can achieve is only 3500 compare
than this model where the growth rate is higher because in every 2000 days
the population of sheep can achieve 7050 sheep. For the modified one, it is
better than the basic model because it has been considers the normal dies for
the two species and period to the population recover is lesser with the higher
maximum population.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
22/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 22
Based on the graph, when the population of sheep is high, the
population of coyote will start increase but when the population of coyotes
keeps increase the population of sheep will decrease. Then, the two
populations will decrease. We can see for every period we have 3 phases,
which are;
1) 1st
phase is from day zero to day 200
a) Population of sheep and coyote increase
i) Population of sheep increase with normal birth rate
ii) Population of coyote increase because have enough food when it
interact with sheep as it food.
2) 2nd
phase from day 200 to day 250
a) Population of sheep decrease but population of coyote increase
i) Population of sheep decreases because it has been eaten by
coyote and dies normally.
ii) Population of coyote increase because it still has food to be eaten
and the growth is still not affected by the decreases of sheep
population.
3) 3rd
phase from day 250 to day 2000
a) Sheep and coyote decrease
i) Population of sheep decreases because it becomes the prey to
coyote which are increases in the 2nd
phase.
ii) Population of coyote decreases because there is lack of food
resources due to the drastically decreasing of sheep.
Since the graph is periodic, we know that the population of these two
species will coexistent. This is proven with the nature of stability by looking
to the phase portrait which show the trajectories of an equilibrium point
(542,174). At this point, the trajectories will move around the critical point.
This portrait shows the population of these two species will remain exist if
there are no other significant forces by nature or by plan. The system behaves
as a not damped oscillator.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
23/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 23
This nature of stability can be visualized in two dimensions as a
vector tracing a circle around a point (a). The plot of response with timewould look sinusoidal (b). The figures as shown below;
(a)
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
24/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 24
(b)
This situation is common in many control system arising out of
competing controllers and other factors. Even so, this is usually undesirable
and considered as an unstable process since the system will not go back tosteady state following a disturbance. This is because; the population is not
remaining but always changes in the period of time. By looking to this result,we also can help the shepherd to estimate their population of sheep eachtime. They can know when the business can give them a better return and
when they will get nothing due to the population of the sheep.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
25/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 25
7.0 CONCLUSION
In the present work, we have been determining the phase potrait and the nature of
stability of each model that we have modified. The solution solved by using pplan8 and
odesolve of Math lab. The nature of stability of critical point for each model has been
achieved by using Jacobian matrix equation. From the findings, it is concluded that there
is coexistence between the populations of two species. In this case, the species of coyote
and sheep. In addition, both populations of the two species always changes in the period
of time.
7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
26/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
Predator - prey Page 26
8.0 REFERENCES
Beals M. et al. (1999). Predator-Prey Dynamics: Lotka-Volterra. Retrieved June
15, 2013, from
http://www.tiem.utk.edu/~gross/bioed/bealsmodules/predator-prey.html
Learn Cheme (2012). Predator - prey Model Kinetics. University of Colorado
Boulder. Retrived June 14, 2013, from
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7o5XweHevbQ
National Geographic Society (2013). Coyote. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from
National Geographic Site:http://animals.nationalgeographic.com
Ncwildlife (2012). Fox and Coyote Populations Study. Retrieved June 15, 2013, from
Ncwildlife site:
http://www.ncwildlife.org/Portals/0/Learning/documents/Species/Fox_Coyot
ePopulationsReport.pdf
Takeuchi Y. et al. (2005). Evolution of predatorprey systems described by a Lotka
Volterra equation under random environment. Journal of Mathematical
Analysis and Applications. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 323, 938957.
Wanda Embar (2007). Sheep. Retrieved June 15, 2013, from veganpeace site:
http://www.veganpeace.com/animal_facts/Sheep.htm
Wikipedia (2013). Sheep. Retrieved June 15, 2013, from Wikipedia site:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_sheep
http://www.tiem.utk.edu/~gross/bioed/bealsmodules/predator-prey.htmlhttp://www.tiem.utk.edu/~gross/bioed/bealsmodules/predator-prey.htmlhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7o5XweHevbQhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7o5XweHevbQhttp://animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/mammals/coyote/?source=A-to-Zhttp://animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/mammals/coyote/?source=A-to-Zhttp://animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/mammals/coyote/?source=A-to-Zhttp://www.ncwildlife.org/Portals/0/Learning/documents/Species/Fox_CoyotePopulationsReport.pdfhttp://www.ncwildlife.org/Portals/0/Learning/documents/Species/Fox_CoyotePopulationsReport.pdfhttp://www.ncwildlife.org/Portals/0/Learning/documents/Species/Fox_CoyotePopulationsReport.pdfhttp://www.veganpeace.com/animal_facts/Sheep.htmhttp://www.veganpeace.com/animal_facts/Sheep.htmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_sheep#Senseshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_sheep#Senseshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_sheep#Senseshttp://www.veganpeace.com/animal_facts/Sheep.htmhttp://www.ncwildlife.org/Portals/0/Learning/documents/Species/Fox_CoyotePopulationsReport.pdfhttp://www.ncwildlife.org/Portals/0/Learning/documents/Species/Fox_CoyotePopulationsReport.pdfhttp://animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/mammals/coyote/?source=A-to-Zhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7o5XweHevbQhttp://www.tiem.utk.edu/~gross/bioed/bealsmodules/predator-prey.html7/29/2019 Report Prey Predator presentation
27/27
The Effect of Sheep's Populations in the Presence of Coyote
9.0 APPENDICS
Let the nonlinear autonomous system be
And () is the critical point.
Jacobian matrix :
)
Recommended