View
236
Download
14
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
RAPIDSMS COMPLIANCENOVEMBER 2012 MNCHW
Dr Femi James
FMOH, ABUJA
Outline About
RapidSMS
Rationale
Assessment of
CompliancePerformance in Nov. 2012
Constraints
Moving Forward
SMS – Short
Message Service
RapidSMS is an information tracking
tool that collects data over “SMS” or
“Text Messages” from mobile users
RapidSMS allows data to be collected
in real time to enable LGA, State,
Federal, and partners to collect,
analyze, and react to data more quickly.
RapidSMS is supplementary to
paper-based system, AND NOT A
REPLACEMENT.
What RapidSMS does
Fast, easy, inexpensive
data collection
Instant analysis
Information in real time
Web-based data
dissemination
Supplement paper
processes
Ensures active feedback to
field workers
Enables vertical and horizontal
peer review
How it works
Ward focal persons use their mobile phones to send SMS report of daily Ward summaries.
SMS are sent to a toll-free short code number, provided by the GSM providers. (MTN & Airtel
for now) - 24453
The SMS are then analyzed and uploaded into the web site as reports for decision makers at all
levels for action.
Output is viewed on the Dashboard @ http://rapidsmsnigeria.org
Core Requirement
RapidSMS requires adequate time to train the right
personnel to understand the rudiments of following
simple procedures in writing given “sms” codes and being able to dedicate themselves
to deliver on agreed time boundaries in order to add value to its deployment in
obtaining better programme management outcomes.
RationaleInformation on Campaign progress received daily and in
real time
Allows for rapid data collection; instant analysis, and prompt action;
Aids decision making at all levels
Aids planning for national development ; child protection
Web-based data dissemination
Triangulates and revalidates paper-based data tools/ mechanism
Assessment of Rapidsms Compliance -Done along four thematic areas
TRAINING
• NO OF REPORTING SITES: WARDS• NO OF REPORTING SITES: LGAS• CONCORDANCE WITH FINAL
COLLATED DATA
COMPLETENESS OF DATA
ACCURACY OF DATA
LOCAL DATA TRACKING, REVIEW AND USE
Performance in November
2012
SE AVG SS AVG SW AVG NC AVG NE AVG NW AVG
100%
42%
95%
62%
48%41%
ZONAL AVERAGE FOR ALL ZONES
%LGAs REPORTED
SE AVG SS AVG SW AVG NC AVG NE AVG NW AVG
87%
24%
73%
42%
19%
30%
ZONAL AVERAGE FOR ALL ZONES
% WARDS REPORTED
SE AVG SS AVG SW AVG NC AVG NE AVG NW AVG
66%
21%
59%
26%
5%
25%
ZONAL AVERAGE FOR ALL ZONES
%DATA COMPLETE
ABIA ANAMBRA EBONYI ENUGU IMO NATL AVG
89%
88%
68%
92% 97
%
44%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
63%73% 70%
43%
66%
80%
32%
% REPORTED-SOUTH EAST
%WARDS REPORTED %LGAS REPORTED %DATA COMPLETE
AKWA IBOM
BAYELSA CROSS RIVER
EDO DELTA RIVERS NATL AVG
0%
6%
88%
0%
14%
37% 44
%
0%
13%
100%
0%
52%
87%
63%
0%
27%
76%
0% 4%
19%
32%
% REPORTED-SOUTH SOUTH
%WARDS REPORTED %LGAS REPORTED %DATA COMPLETE
EKITI LAGOS OGUN ONDO OSUN OYO NATL AVG
90%
35%
96%
86% 89
%
42% 44%
100%
90%
100%94% 93% 91%
63%
77%
6%
71%62%
43%
95%
32%
% REPORTED-SOUTH WEST
%WARDS REPORTED %LGAS REPORTED %DATA COMPLETE
BENUE FCT KOGI KWARA NASARAWA NIGER PLATEAU NATL AVG
89%
66%
24%
10%
0%
90%
13%
44%
100% 100%
62%
13%
0%
100%
59%63%
58%
48%
7%
0% 0%
63%
4%
32%
% REPORTED-NORTH CENTRAL
%WARDS REPORTED %LGAS REPORTED %DATA COMPLETE
ADAMAWA BAUCHI BORNO GOMBE TARABA YOBE NATL AVG
29%
8%
0%
25%
47%
6%
44%
76%
50%
0%
38%
94%
29%
63%
0%4%
0%6%
17%
0%
32%
% REPORTED-NORTH EAST
%WARDS REPORTED %LGAS REPORTED %DATA COMPLETE
JIGAWA KADUNA KANO KATSINA KEBBI SOKOTO ZAMFARA NW AVG NATL AVG
0% 0%
70%
60%
0%
81%
0%
30%
44%
0% 0%
98% 97%
0%
91%
0%
41%
63%
0% 0%
102%
8%0%
65%
0%
25%32%
% REPORTED-NORTH WEST
%WARDS REPORTED %LGAS REPORTED %DATA COMPLETE
SE AVG SS AVG SW AVG NC AVG NE AVG NW AVG
87%
24%
73%
42%
19%
30%
100%
42%
95%
62%
48%41%
ZONAL AVERAGE FOR ALL ZONES
%WARDS REPORTING %LGAs REPORTING
SE AVG SS AVG SW AVG NC AVG NE AVG NW AVG
87%
24%
73%
42%
19%
30%
100%
42%
95%
62%
48%41%
66%
21%
59%
26%
5%
25%
ZONAL AVERAGE FOR ALL ZONES
%WARD REPORTING %LGA REPORTING %DATA COMPLETION
ABIA
EBONYIIM
O
AKWA IB
OM
CROSS RIVERDELT
A
LAGOS
ONDOOYO
BENUEKOGI
NASARAWA
PLATEAU
ADAMAW
A
BORNO
TARABA
KADUNA
KATSINA
SOKOTO
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%13
%10
0%0%
52%
87%
100%
90%
100%
94%
93%
91%
100%
100%
62%
13%
0%10
0%59
%
76%
50%
0%38
%94
%29
%
0% 0%98
%97
%0%
91%
0%
63%
% LGAs REPORTED
ABIA
EBONYIIM
O
AKWA IB
OM
CROSS RIVERDELT
A
LAGOS
ONDOOYO
BENUEKOGI
NASARAWA
PLATEAU
ADAMAW
A
BORNO
TARABA
KADUNA
KATSINA
SOKOTO
89%
88%
68%
92% 97
%
0%6%
88%
0%14
%37
%
90%
35%
96%
86% 89
%42
%
89%
66%
24%
10%
0%90
%13
%
29%
8%0%
25%
47%
6%
0% 0%70
%60
%0%
81%
0%
44%
% WARDS REPORTED
ABIA
EBONYIIM
O
AKWA IB
OM
CROSS RIVERDELT
A
LAGOS
ONDOOYO
BENUEKOGI
NASARAWA
PLATEAU
ADAMAW
A
BORNO
TARABA
KADUNA
KATSINA
SOKOTO
73%
70%
43%
66%
80%
0%27
%76
%0%
4%19
%
77%
6%71
%62
%43
%95
%
58%
48%
7%0% 0%
63%
4%
0%4%
0%6%
17%
0% 0% 0%10
2%8%
0%65
%0%
32%
% DATA COMPLETE
Summary of Constraints
TRAINING GAP• Wrong message strings• Wrong codes: vit a =/=
vita• Wrong data: tallying (fe),
arithmetic, interpretatn(muac)
• Accessing and interpreting from dashboard
• Timing of training
TECHNICAL
FAILU
RE
• GSM
network
availabilit
y
/failu
re
• Internet
server
• Dashboard
engine
failure
Error in re-reportin
g
Incomplete
Dashboard
template
Delayed reporting
Poor
supervision
No local review of Rapidsms data
Moving Forward PLAN AND
CONDUCT TRAINING
EARLY
DAILY
REVIEW AND
M
ONITORING OF
DASHBOARD
AT ALL LEVELS
STRENGHTEN STATE
OPERATIONS ROOM.
ENGAGE
OTHER GSM
SERVIE
PROVIDERS
UPDATE DASHBOA
RD TO CAPTURE MISSING
SITES
USE
DASHBOARD
FINDINGS FOR
ACTIONS AND
DISSEMINAT
EAT ALL LEVELS.
DOCUMENT BEST
PRACTICES & DISSE
MINATE
USE AGREED
DATA TO
OL
FOR FU
LL
REPORTING
Recommended