PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 10 - World Bankicsidfiles.worldbank.org/icsid/ICSIDBLOBS/Online... · Gabriel...

Preview:

Citation preview

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 10 – ANNEX A

TRIBUNAL’S DECISIONS ON CLAIMANTS’ REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS DATED 08 JUNE 2018

Respondent’s Preliminary Comments Claimants’ Preliminary Responses

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

2

Respondent’s Preliminary Comments Claimants’ Preliminary Responses

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

3

Respondent’s Preliminary Comments Claimants’ Preliminary Responses

.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

4

Respondent’s Preliminary Comments Claimants’ Preliminary Responses

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

5

Respondent’s Preliminary Comments Claimants’ Preliminary Responses

- .

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

6

Respondent’s Preliminary Comments Claimants’ Preliminary Responses

-

– –

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

7

Respondent’s Preliminary Comments Claimants’ Preliminary Responses

-

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted.

.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

9

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

10

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

11

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Rejected. The request is directed to proving a negative.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

12

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

13

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

14

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

15

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

– –

- - -

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

16

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

- -

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

17

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

– –

-

Granted as specified by Claimants.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

18

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

- -

Granted as specified by Claimants.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

19

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

– –

Respondent’s statement that it does not have any documents in its possession, custody or control responsive

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

20

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

to this request is noted.

8.

Regarding Request no. 8(i), Respondent’s statement that it does not have any responsive documents in its possession, custody or control is noted. Regarding Request

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

21

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

- - - - - -

-

no. 8(ii), Claimants’ agreement to witndraw the request is noted. Request no. 8(iii) is granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

22

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

23

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

-

-

Requests nos 9(i) to (iii) are granted. Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested document in response to Request no. 9(iv) is noted. Respondent’s statement that it does not have any documents in its possession, custody or control responsive to Request no. 9(v) is noted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

24

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

-

- -

-

-

-

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

25

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Rejected. The request is overly broad. Respondent’s agreement to produce

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

26

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

other letters from TAC members in response to that 14 June 2013 letter is noted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

27

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

28

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

.

Granted only with respect to Request no. 11(i). Respondent’s statement that it does not have any documents in its possession, custody or control responsive to Request no. 11(ii) is noted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

29

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

30

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

-

Rejected. The request is overly broad.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

31

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Respondent is requested to substantiate its objection based on Article 9(2)(f) of the IBA Rules in accordance with

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

32

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

paras 54 and 55.5 of PO 10.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

33

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted subject to limiting the request in terms of time and in terms of specific government agencies.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

34

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

35

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

- - -

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

36

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

37

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

38

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested document is noted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

39

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

40

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

Requests no. 18(i) is rejected. Requests nos 18(ii) to (vi) are granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

41

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

42

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested documents is noted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

43

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

- -

-

Rejected. The request is overly broad.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

44

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

45

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

– –

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

46

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

47

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

48

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

49

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

.

Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested documents is noted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

50

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

– –

- - -

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

51

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted but limited to documents of the Geological Institute’s scientific council making an assessment of the Project.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

52

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

53

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

54

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

55

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

56

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

57

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Regarding Request no. 28(i), Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested document is noted. Requests nos 28(ii) and (iii) are granted as specified. Request no. 28 (iv) is granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

58

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

59

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

60

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Requests nos 30(i), (ii) and (v) are granted. Request no. 30(iii) is granted as specified by Claimants. Request no 30 (iv) is rejected.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

61

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

– –

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

62

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

Request no. 31(i) is granted. Requests nos 31(ii) and (iii) are granted as specified.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

63

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

– –

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

64

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

32.

.

Regarding Rquest no. 32(i), Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested document “if and when it localtes the document” is noted. Request no. 32(ii) is granted as specified.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

65

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

66

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

- - -

Regarding Requests nos 33(i) to (iii), the Tribunal notes Respondent’s statement that it does not have any documents responsive to such requests. The request is granted only with respect to the documents identified by Claimants.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

67

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

The Tribunal notes Respondent’s agreement to produce two documents responsive to this request. Granted only with respect to the letter specified by Claimants referenced in Exh. R-294 at 10.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

68

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted only with respect to the Approval Report for Minister of Culture Order No. 2407 dated 4 October 2006 terminating the Alburnus Maior Program.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

69

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

70

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

71

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

Rejected. The request is overly broad.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

72

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

73

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

74

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

75

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

- -

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

76

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted subject to limiting Requests nos 38(i) to (iii) in terms of time and Request no. 38(ii) also in terms of specific government agencies.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

77

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

78

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted only with respect to Requests nos 39(i) and (ii).

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

79

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested document is noted.

Respondent’s agreement to produce

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

80

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

the requested document is noted.

-

Request no. 42(i) is granted as specified by Claimants. Request no. 42(ii) is granted. Claimants’ agreement to withdraw Request no. 42(iii) is noted. Regarding Request no. 42(iv), Respondent is requested to conduct

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

81

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

a reasonable search for the original attachment to the document produced as Exh. DD-30.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

82

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

83

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested document is noted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

84

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested document is noted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

85

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

86

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted as specified by Claimants.

Respondent’s production of the requested Exposition of Reasons is noted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

87

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested document is noted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

88

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted but limited to documents in NAMR’s possession.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

89

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

.

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

90

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

91

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Rejected. The request is overly broad.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

92

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

– –

-

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

93

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

94

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

95

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

Granted as specified by Claimants.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

96

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

97

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Granted only with respect to Request no. 54(i) and Requests nos 54(ii) to (iv) as specified.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

98

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

99

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted only with respect to Requests nos 55(i) to (iii) and subject to Request no. 55(iii) being limited to certain public authorities.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

100

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

-

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

101

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted only with respect to Requests nos 56(i) to (iii) and subject to Request no. 56(iii) being limited to specific public authorities and in terms of time.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

102

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted only with respect to Requests nos 57(i) to (v) and subject to Requests

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

103

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

nos 57(ii) to (v) being limited to specified public authorities and in terms of time.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

104

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

105

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Rejected. The request is overly broad.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

106

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

.

-

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

107

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

108

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

- - - - - -

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

109

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

110

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

111

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

– –

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

112

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

113

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

114

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

115

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

116

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

117

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

118

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted.

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

119

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted.

Claimants’ decision to withdraw this request is noted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

120

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted.

71.

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

121

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

122

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted.

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

123

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Granted.

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

124

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

- -

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

125

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Granted.

Granted.

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

126

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested documents is noted.

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

127

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

Claimants’ statement that they have requested clarifications from Respondent on the specified issues or that it completes production is noted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

128

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested documents is noted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

129

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

130

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

-

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

131

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Respondent’s production of the requested documentation is noted. Respondent is requested to identify which of its experts in this arbitration have received the produced document.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

132

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Claimants’ decision to withdraw this request is noted.

Granted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

133

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested documents is noted.

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents

134

1 2 3 4 5 6

No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested

Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party

Response/Objections to Document Requests

Reply to Objections to

Document Request

Tribunal’s Decision

Comments

-

Recommended