Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 10 – ANNEX A
TRIBUNAL’S DECISIONS ON CLAIMANTS’ REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS DATED 08 JUNE 2018
Respondent’s Preliminary Comments Claimants’ Preliminary Responses
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
2
Respondent’s Preliminary Comments Claimants’ Preliminary Responses
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
3
Respondent’s Preliminary Comments Claimants’ Preliminary Responses
.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
4
Respondent’s Preliminary Comments Claimants’ Preliminary Responses
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
5
Respondent’s Preliminary Comments Claimants’ Preliminary Responses
- .
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
6
Respondent’s Preliminary Comments Claimants’ Preliminary Responses
-
– –
–
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
7
Respondent’s Preliminary Comments Claimants’ Preliminary Responses
-
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted.
.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
9
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
10
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
11
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
–
-
Rejected. The request is directed to proving a negative.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
12
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
13
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
14
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
15
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
– –
- - -
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
16
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
- -
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
17
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
– –
-
Granted as specified by Claimants.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
18
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
- -
Granted as specified by Claimants.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
19
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
– –
–
Respondent’s statement that it does not have any documents in its possession, custody or control responsive
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
20
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
to this request is noted.
8.
Regarding Request no. 8(i), Respondent’s statement that it does not have any responsive documents in its possession, custody or control is noted. Regarding Request
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
21
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
–
- - - - - -
-
no. 8(ii), Claimants’ agreement to witndraw the request is noted. Request no. 8(iii) is granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
22
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
23
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
-
-
Requests nos 9(i) to (iii) are granted. Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested document in response to Request no. 9(iv) is noted. Respondent’s statement that it does not have any documents in its possession, custody or control responsive to Request no. 9(v) is noted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
24
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
25
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Rejected. The request is overly broad. Respondent’s agreement to produce
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
26
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
other letters from TAC members in response to that 14 June 2013 letter is noted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
27
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
28
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
.
Granted only with respect to Request no. 11(i). Respondent’s statement that it does not have any documents in its possession, custody or control responsive to Request no. 11(ii) is noted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
29
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
30
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
-
Rejected. The request is overly broad.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
31
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Respondent is requested to substantiate its objection based on Article 9(2)(f) of the IBA Rules in accordance with
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
32
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
paras 54 and 55.5 of PO 10.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
33
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted subject to limiting the request in terms of time and in terms of specific government agencies.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
34
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
35
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
- - -
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
36
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
–
–
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
37
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
38
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested document is noted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
39
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
40
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
Requests no. 18(i) is rejected. Requests nos 18(ii) to (vi) are granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
41
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
42
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested documents is noted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
43
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
- -
-
Rejected. The request is overly broad.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
44
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
45
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
– –
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
46
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
47
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
48
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
49
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
.
Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested documents is noted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
50
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
– –
- - -
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
51
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted but limited to documents of the Geological Institute’s scientific council making an assessment of the Project.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
52
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
53
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
54
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
55
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
56
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
57
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Regarding Request no. 28(i), Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested document is noted. Requests nos 28(ii) and (iii) are granted as specified. Request no. 28 (iv) is granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
58
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
59
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
60
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Requests nos 30(i), (ii) and (v) are granted. Request no. 30(iii) is granted as specified by Claimants. Request no 30 (iv) is rejected.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
61
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
– –
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
62
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
Request no. 31(i) is granted. Requests nos 31(ii) and (iii) are granted as specified.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
63
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
– –
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
64
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
32.
.
Regarding Rquest no. 32(i), Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested document “if and when it localtes the document” is noted. Request no. 32(ii) is granted as specified.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
65
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
66
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
- - -
Regarding Requests nos 33(i) to (iii), the Tribunal notes Respondent’s statement that it does not have any documents responsive to such requests. The request is granted only with respect to the documents identified by Claimants.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
67
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
The Tribunal notes Respondent’s agreement to produce two documents responsive to this request. Granted only with respect to the letter specified by Claimants referenced in Exh. R-294 at 10.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
68
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted only with respect to the Approval Report for Minister of Culture Order No. 2407 dated 4 October 2006 terminating the Alburnus Maior Program.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
69
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
70
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
71
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
Rejected. The request is overly broad.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
72
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
73
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
74
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
75
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
- -
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
76
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted subject to limiting Requests nos 38(i) to (iii) in terms of time and Request no. 38(ii) also in terms of specific government agencies.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
77
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
78
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted only with respect to Requests nos 39(i) and (ii).
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
79
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested document is noted.
Respondent’s agreement to produce
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
80
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
the requested document is noted.
-
Request no. 42(i) is granted as specified by Claimants. Request no. 42(ii) is granted. Claimants’ agreement to withdraw Request no. 42(iii) is noted. Regarding Request no. 42(iv), Respondent is requested to conduct
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
81
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
a reasonable search for the original attachment to the document produced as Exh. DD-30.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
82
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
83
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested document is noted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
84
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested document is noted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
85
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
86
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted as specified by Claimants.
Respondent’s production of the requested Exposition of Reasons is noted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
87
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested document is noted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
88
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted but limited to documents in NAMR’s possession.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
89
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
.
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
90
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
91
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
–
–
Rejected. The request is overly broad.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
92
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
–
– –
-
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
93
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
94
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
95
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
Granted as specified by Claimants.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
96
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
97
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Granted only with respect to Request no. 54(i) and Requests nos 54(ii) to (iv) as specified.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
98
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
99
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted only with respect to Requests nos 55(i) to (iii) and subject to Request no. 55(iii) being limited to certain public authorities.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
100
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
-
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
101
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted only with respect to Requests nos 56(i) to (iii) and subject to Request no. 56(iii) being limited to specific public authorities and in terms of time.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
102
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted only with respect to Requests nos 57(i) to (v) and subject to Requests
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
103
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
nos 57(ii) to (v) being limited to specified public authorities and in terms of time.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
104
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
105
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Rejected. The request is overly broad.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
106
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
.
-
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
107
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
108
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
- - - - - -
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
109
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
110
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
111
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
–
– –
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
112
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
113
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
114
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
115
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
116
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
117
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
118
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted.
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
119
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted.
Claimants’ decision to withdraw this request is noted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
120
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted.
71.
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
121
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
122
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted.
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
123
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Granted.
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
124
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
- -
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
125
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Granted.
Granted.
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
126
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested documents is noted.
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
127
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
Claimants’ statement that they have requested clarifications from Respondent on the specified issues or that it completes production is noted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
128
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested documents is noted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
129
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
130
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-
-
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
131
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Respondent’s production of the requested documentation is noted. Respondent is requested to identify which of its experts in this arbitration have received the produced document.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
132
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Claimants’ decision to withdraw this request is noted.
Granted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
133
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
Respondent’s agreement to produce the requested documents is noted.
Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania
ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Claimants’ Requests for Production of Documents
134
1 2 3 4 5 6
No. Documents9 or Category of Documents Requested
Relevance and Materiality According to Requesting Party
Response/Objections to Document Requests
Reply to Objections to
Document Request
Tribunal’s Decision
Comments
-