Presented by Julie Pavlova

1

Optimization of a Time-discrete Nonlinear

Dynamical System From a Problem of Ecology.

Analytical and Numerical Approach.

Presented by Julie Pavlova

2

Overview• Introduction

• The model

• Numerical results

• Controllability

• The problem of controllability

• An iterative solution

• An application of a gradient method

• Conclusion

3

1. Introduction• 1997 - Kyoto Protocol was drawn by EU countries to solve most important ecological problem

• One of its mechanisms - “Joint-Implementation” intends to strengthen international cooperation (on reducing CO2)

4

Joint-Implementation =JI• 1 step : a developed country gives a credit for a developing country to decrease its pollution level

• 2 step : the developing country uses these investments to realize a certain alternative energy project and then it will pay back the credit returning received quotas to the developed country

5

Examples

• Netherlands signed projects of “JI” with Central and Eastern European countries:

a modernization project of a hydroelectric facility in Romania;

a landfill-gas project at eight different sites in Slovakia;

switch from coal to biomass at a power plant in Hungary.

6

2. The Technology- Emission- Means Model (the TEM model)

7

The TEM model:

i:=1,...,n -actors;

-emission of the i-th actor

-technology caused that emission

- financial means

actor “i” actor “j”

|||

the non-linear time-discrete dynamics of the TEM model

i

i

i

M

T

E

8

Relationship between financial means and reduced emissions:

- reduced emissions of actor i in percent;

- financial means of actor i;

- describes the effect on the emissions of the i-th actor if the j-th actor invests money.

)}()()]{()([

)()()1(

)()( )()1(

*

n

1j

tEtEtMtM

tMtMtM

tMtemtEtE

iiiii

iiii

jijii

ij

i

i

em

Μ

Ε

9

λ

M

i

i

*

i

- budget, upper bounds for the financial investigation i=1,...,n;

- the memory parameter which describes the effect of the preceeding investments;

- the growth parameter.

- implies that the actor have not reached yet the demanded value ( -normalized Kyoto level) => reduction of

in the 2nd equation.

- implies that the emissions are less than the requirements of the treaty => will increase in the 2nd equation.

0

0

E

E

i

i0E i

)1( tM i

)1( tM i

10

3. Numerical results

Data of the TEM model

11

T),,( 111actor 1:... actor 2:_._._ actor 3:_ _ _

Influence on the emissions:

12actor 1:... actor 2:_._._._ actor 3:_ _ _ _

Influence on the financial means:

13

14

Influence on the emissions:

actor 1:... actor 2:_._._ actor 3:_ _ _

T),,( 303030

15

Influence on the financial means:

actor 1:... actor 2:_._._ actor 3:_ _ _

16

4. Controllability

},...,1{,0)](^

)(*)[(^

0)(^

)(1

nitMtM itM

tMtem

ji

n

j

jij

The fixed points of dynamic system (steady states, have no time-dependence)

ME

,

Simplifying conditions:

)}()()]{()([)()(

)()()(

* tEtEtMtMtMtM

tMtemtE

iiiiiiii

jiji

n

1j

Consider our model as follows:

17

Regarding the Jacobi-matrix of the right-hand side for the special case emij(t)=em*ij, where the economic relationship is const over a long period, we get:

The eigenvalues:

The fixed points under the simplifying conditions are not attractive.

njtEMλλλλ jj*j

*jn

*n

* ,...,1),(^

1,1,...,1 *1

18

5. The problem of controllability

.)),(),...,(()(

)),(),...,(()(

}),...,1{(:

:

}.0{,},...,1{

1

01

1

0

0

0

ttututu

txtxtx

niRu

Rx

tni

)(x(t),u(t)f(t)x)(tx

n

n

mi

li

iii

i

i

(5.1)

19given.iswhere

,for

(5.4)conditionsInitial

(5.3) andfor

(5.2) andfor

:and

andseemptynon

for

ii

ii

ii

ii

mi

li

n

j

n

j

lmli

Xx

ni

xx

tniXtx

tniUtu

RURXt

ni

niRRRf

ii

jjj

0

0

0

0

1 1

},...,1{

,)0(:

.},...,1{)(

},...,1{)(

:},...,1{

},...,1{:

20

n

jjn

lmmni

im

m

l

i

ii

Xxx

nixxf

UR

ni

,...,n}){(iR

n

,...,n}){(iU:

n

x

x

u

in

i

i

i

11

1

0

0

.),...,(

},...,1{),...,,,...,(

.

},...,1{

.

1:

1

1

:solutionone least at has

(5.5) for ,

:system linear-nonthe 2.

tobelongsof

vectorzerothe for 1.

:sAssumption

scenariousseveralcomparetoable

:determinedare

functions-vectorstate

functionscontrolChoose

21

(5.6) and

(5.4)-(5.1):subset some and

:functions control for Look

(5.5). of solution a be Let

:ility"controllab of problem"

Ntt,...,n}{, ix(t) and xΘ(t)u

N

i

^

imi i

,,1 0

0

n

jjn Xxxx

11 ),...,(

,...,n}){(i

Ruiim

1

: 0

Shortly: given -initial state of the dynamic system under consideration , find control functions (satisfying 5.2) and steer the system (under conditions 5.3) into the steady state of uncontrolled system:

).,...,Θ(ΘΘ

tnitxftxtx

nmm

iii

1

0

~~~~},,...,1{,)),(()()1(

where

(5.7)

22

6. An iterative solution

actor. th-ithe of function payoff-

(6.3)

consider For

.(6.2)

where

(6.1)

:definewe For

).values(5.4 initial-where

choose For

given. some For

RR(u)a

,...,n}{i

,...,n}{,i||||u||x)(u)(t||x(u):a

(t)),(t),...,x(xx(t)

,...,n},{(x(t),u),if(t)x):(u)(tx

Ru

Xx

,...,n}{,ix)(xt

,...,n}{,iXtxt

n

j

mti

iiiti

n

iii

n

j

m

ii

ii

ii

j

j

1

22

22

1

1

0

0

0

1

11

11

,100

1)(

23.1

)())()())(()(()()()1(

1

:

.),(:)(

11

0

*

2

1

1

N t,...,n}{i

tEtutMMtutMtutMtM

(t)),u(t)(Mem(t)E)(tE

R)ΘE,(

.Zu(u))(u

Zu

Zuuau

,...,n}}{iX)(u)(t|xU{u:Z

iiiiiiiiii

jjijii

nn

^

ttt

t

ttt

n

it

tit

n

jiijt

and for

(6.7)

:as controlledto be dynamicsthe assume

points). fixed(the

attractivenot are states steadyThe

(6.6) for

of minimizer global a find :Problem

(6.5)

(6.4) for

:setthe bylinkedare actorsThe

n

1j

24satisfied.

alsoare 5 section of 2) and 1) sAssumption

. for Put

for Put

(5.2). formthe of is (6.8)

(5.1) formthe of is (6.7)

(6.7) of sides hand-rightthe as

Define

for Put

and

(6.8) (

:function control a has nation everySo,

,...,n}{i),M (Ex

,...,n}{i}MM|R),M{(EX

RR:Rf

,...,n}{i,M(E,x,mn

U RU

t,...,n}{i,UuR,:Νu

iii

*iiiii

nni

iiiii

ii

iii

1

10

1)12

0

),1

000

2

222

00

25

fulfilled.are for

and

(6.6)(6.5),(6.3),(6.2),

conditionsthe that such

N 2.

1. find

given

:ility"controllab of problemThe " Now,

Nt,...,n}{i

EtMtEtu

,...,n}{iR,:u

R),ΘE(

iiit

t

nn

^

i

i

,1

)0,())(),((,0)(

1

^

0

0

2

26

7. An application of the gradient method

}.,...,1{,0 niu

a

(u)a

i

ti

ti

:step-time

eachat yiterativelsolve to have We

(6.3). from

minimize to tries actor each

:casee cooperativ-non Consider

27

Numerical results:

Column <Kyoto> means the emission targets mentioned in Kyoto Protocol.

28

It shows that the insertion of the calculated parameters might be successful.

29

8. ConclusionKyoto Protocol demands for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions by the industrialized countries. On the other hand, developing countries are expanding their energy consumptions that leads to increasing levels of greenhouse gas emissions.

The preparation of an optimal management tool requires the possibility to identify, assess and compare several technological options. For that reason the mathematical TEM model was elaborated. Control parameters have to be determined iteratively according to negotiation process.

30

Thanks For

Your Attention!