Presented by Executive Director of Facilities Management Chuck Scott

Presented by Executive Director of Facilities Management Chuck Scott

Facilities Management MissionFacilities Management Mission

• Support Educating Illinois

• Maintain physical environment for the delivery of education

• Safe, functional, aesthetically pleasing, environmentally sensitive

• Recruitment and Retention

• Support Educating Illinois

• Maintain physical environment for the delivery of education

• Safe, functional, aesthetically pleasing, environmentally sensitive

• Recruitment and Retention

Quad (Top Left)

Performing Arts Center (Top Right)

Fell Hall (Bottom Left)

The History of Facilities Growth at Illinois State University

The History of Facilities Growth at Illinois State University

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

5,000,000

6,000,000

1909

1915

1926

1939

1951

1955

1957

1960

1963

1965

1967

1970

1976

1982

1989

1997

2000

Year

Gro

ss S

qu

are

Fee

t

Campus GrowthCampus Growth• 1957-1977: 600,000 gsf to 2,400,000 gsf

equals 390% increase in GR gsf

• BR space approximately same rate of growth

• Total campus now at 6,735,385 gsf

• Capital Replacement Value estimated at $1.2 Billion

• 1957-1977: 600,000 gsf to 2,400,000 gsf equals 390% increase in GR gsf

• BR space approximately same rate of growth

• Total campus now at 6,735,385 gsf

• Capital Replacement Value estimated at $1.2 Billion

Campus Growth Cont.Campus Growth Cont.• National average for maintenance is 2-3% of CRV ($24M)

• 2003 DM backlog $490,577,434

• ISU has expended $99.7M in DM since 2003 (approximately $14M per year)

– Walker, Dunn, Barton $24,000,000 – McCormick $8,777,000 – Watterson Commons $2,000,000

• Building Cost Index adds 4-5% annually

• 2010 DM backlog $532,240,578

• National average for maintenance is 2-3% of CRV ($24M)

• 2003 DM backlog $490,577,434

• ISU has expended $99.7M in DM since 2003 (approximately $14M per year)

– Walker, Dunn, Barton $24,000,000 – McCormick $8,777,000 – Watterson Commons $2,000,000

• Building Cost Index adds 4-5% annually

• 2010 DM backlog $532,240,578

Schroeder Deteriorated InsulationSchroeder Deteriorated Insulation

Linkins Rusted Cooling TowerLinkins Rusted Cooling Tower

Metcalf Rusted Junction BoxMetcalf Rusted Junction Box

Deferred MaintenanceDeferred Maintenance• Facilities Condition Assessment (FCA)

– Similar to a home inspection of all building systems

• Facilities Condition Index (FCI)– Deficiency value of a building calculated by dividing the estimated cost

of current deficiencies by the replacement value and is expressed as a percentage. National standards suggest that buildings with an FCI greater than 10% are in poor condition.

• In 2003, ISU FCI ranged from 1.46% to 72.78% with an aggregate of 44.68%

• Facilities Condition Assessment (FCA)– Similar to a home inspection of all building systems

• Facilities Condition Index (FCI)– Deficiency value of a building calculated by dividing the estimated cost

of current deficiencies by the replacement value and is expressed as a percentage. National standards suggest that buildings with an FCI greater than 10% are in poor condition.

• In 2003, ISU FCI ranged from 1.46% to 72.78% with an aggregate of 44.68%

Total Space by Condition Total Space by Condition

Facilities Maintenance Plan (FMP)Facilities Maintenance Plan (FMP)• Developed to manage the deferred maintenance backlog by

identifying current and future projects• Developed to manage the deferred maintenance backlog by

identifying current and future projects

www2.fac.ilstu.edu/fmp/

Priorities and Pressing Issues Priorities and Pressing Issues

• Long Term solution is multi-faceted and comprehensive

• Continued focus on building envelopes, life/safety, code compliance– Roofs, windows, doors, tuck pointing, fall protection, fire alarm and protection

systems…not visible repairs as they are within the basements and mechanical rooms

• Plan for projects that support themes identified by responses in the public master planning forums

– Sustainability, energy conservation, alternative transportation, green space, electronic access, green standards in design guidelines, accessibility, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking lot maintenance and space allocation, and sensitivity to neighbors and the community

• Safe, functional, aesthetically pleasing, environmentally sensitive

• Long Term solution is multi-faceted and comprehensive

• Continued focus on building envelopes, life/safety, code compliance– Roofs, windows, doors, tuck pointing, fall protection, fire alarm and protection

systems…not visible repairs as they are within the basements and mechanical rooms

• Plan for projects that support themes identified by responses in the public master planning forums

– Sustainability, energy conservation, alternative transportation, green space, electronic access, green standards in design guidelines, accessibility, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking lot maintenance and space allocation, and sensitivity to neighbors and the community

• Safe, functional, aesthetically pleasing, environmentally sensitive

Specific Projects

Specific Projects

• Milner Info Commons, Williams, College of Education, College of Nursing

• Electrical Substation Replacements at U-High, Horton, Fell

• Elevator rehabilitation in Bone, Williams, Centennial East

• Campus-wide emergency generator testing, fall protection systems, tuck pointing, roof repairs, and concrete repairs

• Electronic access for prioritized buildings and rooms

• Capen Auditorium, routine painting and dry erase board replacements

• Milner Info Commons, Williams, College of Education, College of Nursing

• Electrical Substation Replacements at U-High, Horton, Fell

• Elevator rehabilitation in Bone, Williams, Centennial East

• Campus-wide emergency generator testing, fall protection systems, tuck pointing, roof repairs, and concrete repairs

• Electronic access for prioritized buildings and rooms

• Capen Auditorium, routine painting and dry erase board replacements