View
4
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
NITI Aayog
Government of India
User Manual for Digital Platform for
Composite Water Management Index 3.0
November, 2020
Table of Contents
Sl. No. Content Page No.
Abbreviations
1 Background and Rationale 1
2 Sectors Prioritized for Water Management Index 3
3 Key Performance Indicators 4
4 Explanatory Notes for Various key Performance Indicators 14
5 Ranking Methodology 23
6 User Manual for DP for CWMI 3.0 24
Abbreviations
AIBP – Accelerated Irrigation Benefits Programme
BCM – Billion Cubic Metres
CAD & WM – Command Area Development and Water Management
cm – Centimetre
IPC – Irrigation Potential Created
IPU – Irrigation Potential Utilised
ISF – Irrigation Service Fee
IWMP – Integrated Watershed Management Programme
KPIs – Key Performance Indicators
mha – Million Hectare
Max - Maximum
MGNREGS - Mahatma Gandhi Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme
MMI – Major and Medium Irrigation
MoWR, RD&GR – Ministry of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga
Rejuvenation
NITI – National Institution for Transforming India
NRCP - National River Conservation Programme
O&M – Operation and Maintenance
PIM – Participatory Irrigation Management
PMKSY – Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana
RKVY – Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana
UTs – Union Territories
WUAs – Water Users Associations
1
Box 1.1
Status on Average Annual Water Availability
(Figures in parentheses are per cent of total precipitation)
Background and Rationale
The annual precipitation including snowfall, which is the main source of water in
India, is about 4000 billion cubic meters (BCM). However, the average annual rainfall
varies considerably from one region of the country to another. The North East region
receives about 1000 cm and Western Rajasthan gets less than 10 cm of annual
precipitation. Further, most of the rainfall occurs during the season of south-west
monsoon in four months i.e. from June to September.
About 53.3 percent of total precipitation is lost due to evapotranspiration which
leaves a balance of 1869 BCM water in the country. Further, about 40 per cent of the
potential available can’t be put to beneficial use due to topographical constraints and
uneven distribution of water resources over space and time. Thus utilizable water
potential of the country is estimated to be 1137 BCM consisting of 690 BCM of surface
water and 447 BCM of ground water (Box 1.1).
Precipitation received 4000 BCM (100%)
Water Resources Potential 1869 BCM (46.7%)
Utilizable Water Resources 1137 BCM (28.1%)
Ground Water 447 BCM (10.8%)
Surface Water 690 BCM (17.2%)
Availability of both surface and ground water varies from one region to
another. In view of limitations on availability of water resources and rising demand for
water, sustainable management of water resources has acquired critical importance.
NITI Aayog had developed a Composite Water Management Index (CWMI) in 2017 as a
useful tool to assess and further improve the performance in efficient management of
water resources. The index with base year 2015-16 and reference year 2016-17
provided useful information for the States and also for the concerned Central
2
Ministries/Departments enabling them to formulate and implement suitable strategies
for better management of water resources. It has been finalized after an elaborate
exercise including seeking feedback from the States and consultation with reputed
experts.
The Index has a set of 28 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) covering irrigation
status, drinking water and other water-related sectors. Critical areas such as source
augmentation; major and medium irrigation; watershed development; participatory
irrigation practices; sustainable on-farm water use practices; rural drinking water;
urban water supply and sanitation; and policy & governance have been accorded high
priority. The index would serve as a useful tool to track performance in the water sector
and take corrective measures timely for achieving better outcomes thereby meeting the
citizens’ expectations satisfactorily.
3
Sectors Prioritized for Composite Water Management Index
1) Source Augmentation (Restoration of Water Bodies)
2) Source Augmentation (Groundwater)
3) Major and Medium Irrigation - Supply Side Management
4) Watershed Development - Supply Side Management
5) Demand Side Management – Participatory Irrigation Practices
6) Demand Side Management – Sustainable on-farm Water Use Practices
7) Rural Drinking Water
8) Urban Water Supply and Sanitation
9) Policy and Governance
4
Key Performance Indicators
Tracking Water Management Initiatives in States/UTs
(Composite Water Management Index)
State: Year :
2018-19
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Unit Value of
KPI Remarks
1 2 3 4 5
A. Source Augmentation (Restoration of Water Bodies)
1 (a)
Area irrigated by water bodies
restored during the financial year
2018-19 as percentage of the
irrigation potential area of total
number of water bodies
identified for restoration.
%
1 (b)
Area irrigated by water bodies
restored during the financial year
2018-19 as percentage of the
irrigation potential area of total
number of water bodies
identified for restoration.
%
B. Source Augmentation (Groundwater)
2 (a)
Number of overexploited and
critical assessment units those
have experienced rise in water
table in pre monsoon 2017 as
compared to water levels in pre
monsoon 2016 [recorded by the
observation wells tapping the
shallow aquifer monitored by the
State (piezometers installed for
the purpose) and CGWB] as
percentage of total number of
%
5
Tracking Water Management Initiatives in States/UTs
(Composite Water Management Index)
State: Year :
2018-19
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Unit Value of
KPI Remarks
1 2 3 4 5
overexploited and critical
assessment units.
2 (b)
Number of overexploited and
critical assessment units those
have experienced rise in water
table in pre monsoon 2018 as
compared to water levels in pre
monsoon 2017 [recorded by the
observation wells tapping the
shallow aquifer monitored by the
State (piezometers installed for
the purpose) and CGWB] as
percentage of total number of
overexploited and critical
assessment units.
%
3 (a)
Percentage of areas of major
groundwater re-charging
identified and mapped for the
State as on 31.3.2018.
%
3 (b)
Percentage of areas of major
groundwater re-charging
identified and mapped for the
State as on 31.3.2019.
%
4 (a)
Percentage of mapped area
covered with infrastructure for
re-charging groundwater to the
total mapped area as on
31.03.2018.
%
4 (b) Percentage of mapped area
covered with infrastructure for %
6
Tracking Water Management Initiatives in States/UTs
(Composite Water Management Index)
State: Year :
2018-19
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Unit Value of
KPI Remarks
1 2 3 4 5
re-charging groundwater to the
total mapped area as on
31.03.2019
5
Has the State notified any Act or a
regulatory framework for
regulation of Groundwater use/
management?
Yes/
No
C. Major and Medium Irrigation - Supply Side Management
6 (a)
Irrigation Potential Utilized (IPU)
as percentage of Irrigation
Potential Created (IPC) as on
31.03.2018
%
6 (b)
Irrigation Potential Utilized (IPU)
as percentage of Irrigation
Potential Created (IPC) as on
31.03.2019
%
7 (a)
Total number of major and
medium irrigation projects in the
State
No.
7 (b)
Number of projects assessed and
identified for the IPC-IPU gap in
the State?
No.
8
Expenditure incurred on works
(excluding establishment
expenditure) for maintenance of
irrigation assets per hectare of
command area during the
Financial Year 2018-19?
Rs./
ha
9 (a) The length of the canal and
distribution network lined as on %
7
Tracking Water Management Initiatives in States/UTs
(Composite Water Management Index)
State: Year :
2018-19
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Unit Value of
KPI Remarks
1 2 3 4 5
31.03.2018 as percentage of the
total length of canal and
distribution network found
suitable (selected) for lining for
improving conveyance efficiency.
9 (b)
The length of the canal and
distribution network lined as on
31.03.2019 as percentage of the
total length of canal and
distribution network needed
(selected) for lining for
improving conveyance efficiency.
%
D. Watershed Development - Supply Side Management
10
Area under rain-fed agriculture
as a percentage of the net
cultivated area as on 31.3.2018
or previous year
%
11
Number of water harvesting
structures constructed or
rejuvenated as percentage of the
target (sanctioned projects under
IWMP, RKVY, MGNREGS and
other schemes) during the
Financial Year 2018-19.
%
12 (a) Assets created under IWMP No.
12 (b)
geo-tagged assets as percentage
of total assets created under
IWMP on 31.03.2018
%
12 (c) geo-tagged assets as percentage
of total assets created under %
8
Tracking Water Management Initiatives in States/UTs
(Composite Water Management Index)
State: Year :
2018-19
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Unit Value of
KPI Remarks
1 2 3 4 5
IWMP on 31.03.2019
E. Demand Side Management – Participatory Irrigation Practices
13
Has the State notified any law/
legal framework to facilitate
Participatory Irrigation
Management (PIM) through
Water User Associations (WUAs)?
Yes/
No
14 (a) Irrigated Command Area in the
State as on 31.03.2018 ha
14 (b)
Percentage of irrigated command
areas having WUAs involved in
the O&M of irrigation facilities
(minor distributaries and
CAD&WM) as on 31.3.2019
%
14 (c) Irrigated Command Area in the
State as on 31.03.2018. ha
14 (d)
Percentage of irrigated command
areas having WUAs involved in
the O&M of irrigation facilities
(minor distributaries and
CAD&WM) as on 31.3.2019
%
15 (a)
Total irrigation service fee
collected during the financial
year 2018-19
15 (b)
Irrigation Service Fee (ISF)
retained by WUAs as percentage
of the total fee collected by WUAs
during the Financial Year 2018-
19.
%
9
Tracking Water Management Initiatives in States/UTs
(Composite Water Management Index)
State: Year :
2018-19
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Unit Value of
KPI Remarks
1 2 3 4 5
15 (c)
Total irrigation service fee
collected during the financial
year 2018-19
15 (d)
Irrigation Service Fee (ISF)
retained by WUAs as percentage
of total fee collected by WUAs
during the Financial Year 2018-
19.
%
F. Demand Side Management – Sustainable on-farm Water Use Practices
16 (a)
Area cultivated by adopting
standard cropping pattern as per
agro-climatic zoning, as
percentage of total area under
cultivation as on 31.03.2018
%
16 (b)
Area cultivated by adopting
standard cropping pattern as per
agro-climatic zoning, as
percentage of total area under
cultivation as on 31.03.2019
%
17 (a) Has the State segregated
agriculture power feeder?
Yes/
No
17 (b)
Area in the state covered with
segregated agriculture power
feeder as percentage of the total
area under cultivation with
power supply during 2018-19.
%
17 (c)
Area in the state covered with
segregated agriculture power
feeder as percentage of the total
10
Tracking Water Management Initiatives in States/UTs
(Composite Water Management Index)
State: Year :
2018-19
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Unit Value of
KPI Remarks
1 2 3 4 5
area under cultivation with
power supply during 2018-19.
18 (a) Is electricity to tube wells/ water
pumps charged in the State?
Yes/
No
18 (b) If yes, then whether it is charged
as per fixed charges?
Yes/
No
18 (c) If yes, then whether it is charged
on the basis of metering?
Yes/
No
19 (a) Total Irrigated Area in the State
as on 31.03.2018. ha
19 (b)
Area covered with micro-
irrigation systems as percentage
of total irrigated area as on
31.03.2018.
%
19 (c) Total Irrigated Area in the State
as on 31.03.2019. ha
19 (d)
Area covered with micro-
irrigation systems as percentage
of total irrigated area as on
31.03.2019.
%
G. Rural Drinking Water
20 (a)
Percentage of total rural
habitations fully covered with
drinking water supply as on
31.03.2018.
%
20 (b)
Percentage of total rural
habitations fully covered with
drinking water supply as on
31.03.2019.
%
20 (c) Number of villages provided with
24 x 7 piped water supply as on No.
11
Tracking Water Management Initiatives in States/UTs
(Composite Water Management Index)
State: Year :
2018-19
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Unit Value of
KPI Remarks
1 2 3 4 5
31.03.2018.
20 (d)
Number of villages provided with
24 x 7 piped water supply as on
31.03.2019.
No.
20 (e)
Number of villages having
individual household water
meters as on 31.03.2018.
No.
20 (f)
Number of villages having
individual household water
meters as on 31.03.2019
No.
21 (a)
Percentage reduction in rural
habitations affected by Water
Quality problems during the
Financial Year 2018-19
%
21 (b)
Percentage reduction in rural
habitations affected by Water
Quality problems during the
Financial Year 2018-19
%
H. Urban Water Supply and Sanitation
22 (a)
Percentage of urban population
being provided drinking water
supply as on 31.03.2018
%
22 (b)
Percentage of urban population
being provided drinking water
supply as on 31.03.2019
%
23 (a)
Total estimated generation of
waste water in the urban areas as
on 31.03.2018
Vol./
cum
12
Tracking Water Management Initiatives in States/UTs
(Composite Water Management Index)
State: Year :
2018-19
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Unit Value of
KPI Remarks
1 2 3 4 5
23 (b)
Capacity installed in the state to
treat the urban waste-water as a
percentage of the total estimated
waste water generated in the
urban areas of the state as on
31.03.2018
%
24 (a) Percentage waste-water treated
during 2018-19 %
24 (b) Percentage waste-water treated
during 2018-19 %
I. Policy and Governance
25
Whether the State has enacted
any legislation for protection of
water bodies and water-supply
channels and prevention of
encroachment into/on them?
Yes/
No
26
Whether the State has any
framework for rain water
harvesting in public and private
buildings?
Yes/
no
27 (a)
Percentage of households being
provided water supply and
charged for water in the urban
areas as on 31.3.2018?
%
27 (b)
Percentage of households being
provided water supply and
charged for water in the urban
areas as on 31.3.2019?
%
28 (a) Does the State have a separate
integrated Data Centre for water
Yes/
No
13
Tracking Water Management Initiatives in States/UTs
(Composite Water Management Index)
State: Year :
2018-19
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Unit Value of
KPI Remarks
1 2 3 4 5
resources?
28 (b)
Whether the data is being
updated on the integrated data
centre on a regular basis?
Yes/
No
14
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator Explanatory Notes
A. Source Augmentation (Restoration of Water Bodies)
1 (a)
Area irrigated by water bodies
restored during the financial
year 2018-19 as percentage of
the area of total number of
water bodies identified for
restoration.
The achievement in % of Irrigated Area
from restored water bodies
(Lakes/Ponds/Reservoirs/Tanks) used for
the purpose of irrigation constructed under
various programmes such as PMKSY, IWMP,
MGNREGA and other Central/States
programme/ and also initiative under PRI’s
need to be reported. The data may be
sourced from MI census of the MOWR,RD &
GR/ State Government.
1 (b)
Area irrigated by water bodies
restored during the financial
year 2018-19 as percentage of
the area of total number of
water bodies identified for
restoration.
B. Source Augmentation (Groundwater)
2 (a) Number of overexploited and
critical assessment units those
have experienced rise in water
table in pre monsoon 2018 as
compared to water levels in pre
monsoon 2017 [recorded by
the observation wells tapping
the shallow aquifer monitored
by the State (piezometers
installed for the purpose) and
CGWB] as percentage of total
number of overexploited and
critical assessment units.
Central Ground Water Board, Dynamic
Groundwater Resources of India, 2011; and
other reports of the States and the MoWR,
RD & GR may be referred to. Improvement in
performance based on the water level
observation by the piezometers specifically
installed for the purpose in the State
(reduction of over-exploited and critical
blocks) would be considered for scoring.
2 (b) Number of overexploited and
critical assessment units those
have experienced rise in water
-do-
Composite Water Management Index
Explanatory Notes for various Key Performance Indicators
15
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator Explanatory Notes
table in pre monsoon 2019 as
compared to water levels in pre
monsoon 2018 [recorded by
the observation wells tapping
the shallow aquifer monitored
by the State (piezometers
installed for the purpose) and
CGWB] as percentage of total
number of overexploited and
critical assessment units.
3 (a) Percentage of areas of major
groundwater re-charging
identified and mapped for the
State as on 31.3.2018
As there are selected recharging zones
where the soil texture and type where in the
permeability is high enough to drain the
water to aquifer quickly. The State needs to
identify such areas and map them vis-à-vis
the recharging activities being taken.
Geo-coordinates need to be indicated on the
mapped areas.
3 (b) Percentage of areas of major
groundwater re-charging
identified and mapped for the
State as on 31.3.2019
4 (a) Percentage of mapped area
covered with infrastructure for
re-charging groundwater to the
total mapped area as on
31.03.2018.
The meaning for area to be covered with the
infrastructure of recharging groundwater is
to develop recharging structures such as
check dams, ponds, tanks, and also injection
wells for recharging the groundwater.
4 (b) Percentage of mapped area
covered with infrastructure for
re-charging groundwater to the
total mapped area as on
31.03.2019.
5 Has the State notified any Act
or a regulatory framework for
regulation of Groundwater use/
management?
Data source: Notification of the State
Government
C. Major and Medium Irrigation - Supply Side Management
6 (a) Irrigation Potential Utilized
(IPU) as percentage of
Data source - Reports of the Ministry of
Agriculture and Farmers Welfare; the
16
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator Explanatory Notes
Irrigation Potential Created
(IPC) as on 31.03.2018
Ministry of Water Resources, River
Development and Ganga Rejuvenation and
the concerned State Government.
6 (b)
Irrigation Potential Utilized
(IPU) as percentage of
Irrigation Potential Created
(IPC) as on 31.03.2019
7 (a)
Total number of major and
medium irrigation projects in
the State
A total of 143 projects completed under
AIBP and other non-AIBP projects across the
country need to be examined for the IPC-IPU
gap. The gap of 12.40 million ha in the sector
of MMI and 3.29 million ha in the sector of
Minor Irrigation (Surface) has been reported
in the country. There may be certain other
projects implemented by the State
Government, which may also be included in
the information.
7 (b)
Number of projects assessed
and identified for the IPC-IPU
gap in the State?
8
Expenditure incurred on works
(excluding establishment
expenditure) for maintenance
of irrigation assets per hectare
of command area during the
Financial Year 2018-19?
(a) Establishment expenditure such as
salary, office expenses, travelling
expenses etc. should be excluded.
(b) Command area as per irrigation
potential created.
(c) Deviation from the maintenance norm
indicated by the 13th Finance
Commission (adjusted for inflation)
would be the criteria for awarding the
score.
9 (a)
The length of the canal and
distribution network lined as
on 31.03.2018 as percentage of
the total length of canal and
distribution network found
suitable (selected) for lining for
improving conveyance
efficiency.
(a) Conveyance efficiency is enhanced
substantially by converting the unlined
sections of the canal network into lined
sections.
(b) The data on lined canal network may
be obtained from the Reports of the
concerned State Government.
9 (b)
17
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator Explanatory Notes
The length of the canal and
distribution network lined as
on 31.03.2018 as percentage of
the total length of canal and
distribution network needed
(selected) for lining for
improving conveyance
efficiency.
D. Watershed Development - Supply Side Management
10
Area under rain-fed agriculture
as a percentage of the net
cultivated area as on 31.3.2018
or previous year
(a) The objective is to bring more and
more area under assured irrigation.
(b) Agriculture Statistics at a Glance and
other reports of the Ministry of
Agriculture and Farmers Welfare may
be referred to for the data.
11
Number of water harvesting
structures constructed or
rejuvenated as percentage of
the target (sanctioned projects
under IWMP, RKVY, MGNREGS
and other schemes) during the
Financial Year 2018-19.
Achievement of target set for
construction/rejuvenation of water
harvesting structures under IWMP, RKVY,
MGNREGS and other schemes for the year
needs to be reported by the State.
12 (a) Assets created under IWMP Total number of assets created under IWMP
is to be reported.
12 (b)
geo-tagged assets as
percentage of total assets
created under IWMP on
31.03.2018
Inventory of assets with their geo-
coordinates needs to be put in place.
12 (c)
geo-tagged assets as
percentage of total assets
created under IWMP on
31.03.2019
E. Demand Side Management – Participatory Irrigation Practices
13
Has the State notified any law/
legal framework to facilitate
Participatory Irrigation
The objective is to promote active
participation of the farmers in operation and
maintenance of the created irrigation
18
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator Explanatory Notes
Management (PIM) through
Water User Associations
(WUAs)?
infrastructure and also in achieving the best-
possible water-use efficiency.
14 (a)
and 14
(c)
Irrigated Command Area in the
State
Total irrigated command area is required to
be reported
14 (b)
Percentage of irrigated
command areas having WUAs
involved in the O&M of
irrigation facilities (minor
distributaries and CAD&WM)
as on 31.3.2018
% of command areas where WUAs,
registered under the relevant Act, are
engaged in operation and maintenance of
irrigation facilities (minor distributaries &
CAD&WM) need to be reported.
14 (d)
Percentage of irrigated
command areas having WUAs
involved in the O&M of
irrigation facilities (minor
distributaries and CAD&WM)
as on 31.3.2019
15 (a)
and (c)
Total irrigation service fee
collected during the financial
year 2018-19
WUAs need to be strengthened by allowing
them to retain part of the Irrigation Service
Fee collected from the farmers, as per the
Act/Rule notified by the concerned State
Government for promoting Participatory
Irrigation Management.
15 (b) Irrigation Service Fee (ISF)
retained by WUAs as
percentage of total fee
collected by WUAs during the
Financial 2018-19.
15 (d) Irrigation Service Fee (ISF)
retained by WUAs as
percentage of total fee collected
by WUAs during the Financial
2018-19.
F. Demand Side Management – Sustainable on-farm Water Use Practices
16 (a) Area cultivated by adopting
standard cropping pattern as
per agro-climatic zoning, as
Reports of the Ministry of Agriculture and
Farmers Welfare; and the Agriculture
Department of the State may provide the
19
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator Explanatory Notes
percentage of total area under
cultivation as on 31.03.2018
data on cropping pattern as per agro-
climatic zoning.
16 (b) Area cultivated by adopting
standard cropping pattern as
per agro-climatic zoning, as
percentage of total area under
cultivation as on 31.03.2019
17 (a) Has the State segregated
agriculture power feeder?
Separation of agriculture and non-
agriculture power feeders facilitates
judicious rostering of power supply to
agricultural and non-agricultural consumers
in the rural areas.
17 (b) Area in the state covered with
segregated agriculture power
feeder as percentage of the
total area under cultivation
with power supply during
2018-19.
17 (c) Area in the state covered with
segregated agriculture power
feeder as percentage of the
total area under cultivation
with power supply during
2018-19.
18 (a)
Is electricity to tube wells/
water pumps charged in the
State?
A Score of 1 would be awarded for metered
power supply and 0.5 for flat rate charges 18 (b)
If yes, then whether it is
charged as per fixed charges?
18 (c)
If yes, then whether it is
charged on the basis of
metering?
19 (a) Total Irrigated Area in the State
as on 31.03.2018.
The total area irrigated is the sum of the
area irrigated by major/medium/minor
irrigation, watershed development,
MGNREGA schemes.
Use of micro-irrigation systems i.e. drip and
sprinkler need to be promoted.
19 (b) Area covered with micro-
irrigation systems as
percentage of total irrigated
area as on 31.03.2018.
20
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator Explanatory Notes
19 (c) Total Irrigated Area in the State
as on 31.03.2019
19 (d) Area covered with micro-
irrigation systems as
percentage of total irrigated
area as on 31.03.2019
G. Rural Drinking Water - Supply
20 (a)
Percentage of total rural
habitations fully covered with
drinking water supply as on
31.03.2018.
A habitation is considered fully covered with
drinking water supply when all its
inhabitants are provided drinking water of
good quality at the rate of minimum 40 litres
per capita per day.
20 (b)
Percentage of total rural
habitations fully covered with
drinking water supply as on
31.03.2019.
20 (c)
Number of villages provided
with 24 x 7 piped water supply
as on 31.03.2018.
20 (d)
Number of villages provided
with 24 x 7 piped water supply
as on 31.03.2019.
20 (e)
Number of villages having
individual household water
meters as on 31.03.2018.
20 (f)
Number of villages having
individual household water
meters as on 31.03.2019
21 (a)
Percentage reduction in rural
habitations affected by Water
Quality problems during the
Financial Year 2018-19
(a) Data sources: Reports of the States and
the Ministry of Drinking Water and
Sanitation.
(b) % reduction in rural habitations
affected by Water Quality problems
(Arsenic and Fluoride affected
habitations) during the Financial Years
2015-16 and 2016-17 need to be
reported.
21 (b)
Percentage reduction in rural
habitations affected by Water
Quality problems during the
Financial Year 2018-19
1H. Urban Water Supply and Sanitation
22 (a) Percentage of urban population
being provided drinking water
Population in urban areas, as defined in the
census report, being provided drinking
21
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator Explanatory Notes
supply as on 31.03.2018 water supply need to be reported.
22 (b)
Percentage of urban population
being provided drinking water
supply as on 31.03.2019
23 (a)
Total estimated generation of
waste water in the urban areas
as on 31.03.2018
(a) Capacity installed under Namami Gange,
NRCP and other Centrally Sponsored
Schemes; and also under State
Plans/programmes needs to be
reported.
(b) Discharge of untreated sewage from the
urban areas is one of the largest sources
of pollution in rivers. It is required to
bridge the gap between the sewage
generation and the sewage treatment
capacity.
23 (b)
Capacity installed in the state to
treat the urban waste-water as
a percentage of the total
estimated waste water
generated in the urban areas of
the state as on 31.03.2019
24 (a) Percentage waste-water
treated during 2017-18
Percentage of wastewater generated from
the urban households that undergoes
different (primary, secondary and tertiary)
levels of treatment before getting discharged
to the aquatic environment.
24 (b)
Percentage waste-water
treated during 2018-19
I. Policy and Governance
25
Whether the State has enacted
any legislation for protection of
water bodies and prevention of
encroachment into/on water
bodies?
-
26
Whether the State has any
regulatory framework for rain
water harvesting in public and
private buildings?
-
27 (a)
Percentage of households being
provided water supply and
charged for water in the urban
areas as on 31.3.2018?
Households in urban areas, as defined in the
census report, being provided water supply
and charged for water need to be reported.
27 (b) Percentage of households being
provided water supply and
22
Sr. No. Key Performance Indicator Explanatory Notes
charged for water in the urban
areas as on 31.3.2019?
28 (a) Does the State have a separate
integrated Data Centre for
water resources?
Updated data-base is needed annually for
planning and implementing appropriate
interventions to manage water resources
scientifically. 28 (b) Whether the data is being
updated on the integrated data
centre on a regular basis?
23
i = 1 to 28
Ranking Methodology
(Methodology for ranking of the States based upon performance against KPIs)
1. Score against the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) - Si (i = 1 to 28)
(a) For the unit of measurement ‘Yes/No’, a State having response ‘Yes’ would be
awarded a score of ‘1’ and the State having ‘No’ response would be awarded ‘0’.
(b) The scoring assigns importance to improvement on identified KPIs during the year.
For improved performance during the 2018-19 over 2017-18, score in terms of
percentage increase in improvement would be awarded.
(c) For the unit of measurement in absolute numbers, a State will be awarded the score
on a range of 1 to 5 where 1 relates to the lowest performance and 5 to the highest.
Others would be awarded proportionately.
2. Weightage to the indicators - Wi (i = 1 to 28)
(a) The weightage to the various sections is under:-
Section Weightage
Source Augmentation (Restoration of Water Bodies) 5
Source Augmentation (Groundwater) 15
Major and Medium Irrigation (Supply Side Management) 15
Watershed Development (Supply Side Management) 10
Demand Side Management – Participatory Irrigation Practices 10
Demand Side Management – Sustainable on-farm water-use
practices 10
Rural Drinking Water – Supply and Demand Side Management 10
Urban Water Supply and Sanitation 10
Policy and Governance 15
Total 100
(b) Each Indicator in a section would be assigned equal weightage i.e. total weightage
for the section/no. of indicators in the section.
3. Composite Score
Composite score for a State = Σ (Si x Wi)/Max Si
24
Introduction
CWMI is an important tool to assess and improve the performance of States/ Union Territories in
efficient management of water resources. The index would provide useful information for the States,
UT and for the concerned Central Ministries/Departments enabling them to formulate and implement
suitable strategies for better management of water resources.
The reporting states are basically into three groups - Non-Himalayan states and North-Eastern and
Himalayan States, and Union Territories to account for different hydrological conditions across these
groups.
The Index comprises nine themes (each having an attached weight) with 28 different
indicators covering groundwater and surface water restoration, major and medium
irrigation, watershed development, participatory irrigation management, on-farm
water use, rural and urban water supply, and policy and governance.
The Index will measure both the overall progress made by states in water
management and the incremental improvement in performance across time.
The results of the entire exercise will be used to propel action in the states to improve
water outcomes, besides improving data collection and performance monitoring
mechanisms.
The System will allow the process of data collection to happen seamlessly in a
decentralized manner by state/UT departments to shorten the time taken in collating,
ingesting and processing these data and reduce manual error by having the data entry
through standardized forms.
The system would automatically complete computation from raw data to
normalization till ranking.
The system has automated workflow, with assisted data entry by states, to validation
and finally approval by admin user.
The system has automated alerts and notifications facilities
Web Portal
Home
On accessing the application URL, the home page is displayed.
Login : User can login to the application by clicking here
Submit Data: Click on this button to go to Data submission and approval portal.
MIS View: Click this button to view and compare the rankings and scores in both
tabular and graphical form.
Geoportal: This is the default view and shows the scores in map.
Login
The user can login to the application by clicking on the login button
Enter a valid username in the username text box.
In case the user credentials are invalid, an error message is shown. 25
26
System Features
GIS view
Click on the GIS icon on the top of the screen
Select the filter shown on the left panel of the screen
Select the year and state and click on submit
The heat map is shown and has following colors
Green - High score
Yellow - Medium score
Red - low score
Grey - No data
27
On the right side of the screen we have the data tab, which shows the map data in tabular
format
28
The map also has navigation tools to zoom in and out of the map
MIS View
Click on the MIS icon on the top.
Smart Chart View:
Select the year and desired category of state
Click on submit
Click on the arrow on the right side of the screen (as shown in the image above) to see the change in score from base year.
29
Comparison view:
You can compare the scores, rankings and improvement of various states in this view.
Custom Ranking:
In this view, you can compare the ranking of the states.
You can even select one or more indicators to compare the state ranking based on the
selected indicators.
30
Indicator wise Comparison:
Select the Group of states, Year, and indicator, you’ll be able to see the indicator wise
comparison of the states
Theme wise comparison:
Select the Group of states, Year, and theme, you’ll be able to see the indicator wise
comparison of the states
31
Data upload process by State Nodal Officer
The process begins after the admin sets the window for submitting data. User can submit the data to the validation agencies in two ways
Input form
Bulk/Excel upload (i.e by uploading all the values at once in the system)
Click on the “Submit Data” and following page will come up.
Input form
Select the year for which you are uploading the data.
Enter the data by selecting each of the theme and input the values in the
respective indicators.
Once the data is entered, click on “save”. If you wish to clear the data
entered, you can click on “reset”
32
Once the data is saved, click on the “Data Submission” tab at the left
Select the “Assessment year”.
Select the “Data Submission” level.
Select ‘State level’
Click on “Edit”
Select the records you wish to send for approval
Click on “Submit” and your data will be sent to the Validating Agency for
approval.
You can check the data that has been sent to the Validation Agency in
“History” tab right next to the “Approvals” tab.
Bulk/Excel upload:
Download the template:
Click on “Excel Download”.
Select the current year from “Assessment year” drop down.
Click on “Download”.
12
Your file will be downloaded, and this file can be used as template for
entering the data
Uploading the excel sheet:
Click on “Excel upload”
select the year for which you are uploading the data.
Select the file with valid inputs
click on “Upload”.
The file will be uploaded successfully
Note: In case the required format of a field does not match the user input, the
system will throw an error message highlighting the places the values need changes.
33
Click on “Data Submission”
Submit the data the same way it was done for the values
from input form (i.e. select the record which you want to send to Validation
agency and click on “Submit).
Check the submitted data in “History” tab next to “Approvals” tab.
District shape file upload: The district level shape files can be uploaded here.
Select the valid shape file
Click on “Upload”
Once the file is uploaded successfully, the hierarchy and year will populate
Then click on “Submit”
If the uploaded file is not in the required file format, the system will show a
message.
34
Recommended