Nelson Fok - NCCEH

Preview:

Citation preview

Nelson Foknelson.fok@capitalhealth.ca

Capital Health

Role of Public Health in Preventing Waterborne

Outbreaks

Municipality

Laboratory

Environment UtilityPublic

LicensingOperation

Regulatory Co-operation

Health

Role of EHOs – 2006 Survey published in En. Health Review

• 74% enforcement of drinking water regulation and standards by monitoring water quality (bacteria and chemical) with follow-ups

• 48.6% inspect small, unregulated systems and advising how to correct deficiencies

• 15% assuring that drinking water is safe

What is the role for Health Department ?

POTABLE WATERWHO• Suitable for human consumption and for all

usual domestic purposes, including personal hygiene, washing, showering and domestic food preparation

• Ingestion, contact and aerosol inhalation

• Lifetime exposure

• Not designed for those with high sensitivities and specific immune disorders

Drinking Water Systems

Public Water Systems

Transportation/ Food Private Water Systems

DepotsHaulers

Bottled water, vending

machines, irrigation, ice

Privately owned homes/farms

Non-Transient• Wells, Dugouts,

Cisterns

Transient• Recreational,

Cabins (wells, cisterns)

Non-Approved individual

Non-Approved community

Approved community

Individual municipalities Non-licensed

communityRegional Systems

Distribution only

Non-licensed community

Non-transient• Co-op (<3km,

15 connections), schools, institutions, industries, offices, mobile home parks

Transient• Gas stations,

campgrounds, resorts, restaurants, hotels, motels, B&B, community halls

Drinking Water Systems in Alberta

• Source-to-Tap

• HACCP and Critical Control Points

• Active monitoring and passive surveillance

• Effective and timely declaration of Boil Water Advisory (intervention strategy)

• Promote water safety

• Provide information to public

Multi-barrier approach

CCPs

Prevention

Protection

Role of EHOs – 2006 Survey published in En. Health Review

• 74% enforcement of drinking water regulation and standards by monitoring water quality (bacteria and chemical) with follow-ups

• 48.6% inspect small, unregulated systems and advising how to correct deficiencies

• 15% assuring that drinking water is safe

Microbial Monitoring

Public health focuses on end-product testing - Not the most reliable method of detecting waterborne outbreaks

Problem in depending on water sampling to determine safety of system:

• Small sample size

• Microorganisms not evenly distributed, with clustering and adherence to suspended solids

• 0/100 mL samples is the detection limit

• Most pollution episode are transient

• Sampling only identifies contamination once it has occurred i.e. NOT PREVENTION

• Indicator only and not indicative of Crypto and Giardia

• Fixed time and date for sampling

• E. coli not indicator for non-fecal pathogens especially those capable of multiplying in the distribution system (Legionella and Mycobacteria)

Better solution than microbial monitoring to ensure safety of water is source-to-tap or multi-barrier approach:

- Source water protection and monitoring

- Treatment process optimization and enhancements

- Storage and distribution system integrity

Multi-Barrier Approach

Based on the theory that no single barrier can consistently inactivate or remove all waterborne pathogens, and can be breached by some overwhelming pollution events

Multi-Barrier Approach

Traditional multi-barrier (WHO)

• Protection of source water

• Coagulation, flocculation and sedimentation

• Filtration

• Disinfection

• Protection of the distribution system

Health Canada Source to Tap 2002

Waterborne Outbreaks: Sign, Symptoms and

Prevention

Canada

Report: 1974-2001 (published 2005)

288 WB outbreaks, 99 in public systems, 128 semi- public, 51 private

Main causative agents: Giardia, Campylobacter, Cryptosporidium, Norovirus, Salmonella, HAV

Canada

Causative factor:

Public: water treatment issues, inadequate regulation

Semi-public: septic tanks, water treatment issues, inadequate regulation

Private: septic tanks

Waterborne outbreaks symptoms

(in order of occurrence)

• Watershed events

• Variations in WTP operational parameters

• Occurrence of cases (syndromic surveillance) and consumer complaints

• Etiologic agents found in water

Prevention

Protection

Contamination of Drinking Water

Source water

• Weather or other events over- whelmed log removal ability of the plant

• Understand seasonal variation and peaks in microbial quality as this will influence the requirements for treatment, treatment efficiency and resulting health risk

Contamination of Drinking Water

Source water

• 51% of waterborne disease outbreaks in the US were preceded by precipitation events above 90th

percentile, and 68% by events above the 80th percentile

• One month for surface water and 2- month lag for groundwater contamination events

Contamination of Drinking Water

Source water

• WWTP releases poorly treated effluent during high rainfall or plant failure

• Spreading of biosolids and subsequent runoffs

• Stormwater

• Combined sewer

• Agricultural operations

Contamination of Drinking Water

Source water:

Source water profile and understand environmental signals

Risk evaluation to identify potential contamination sources

Monitoring protocol

Contamination of Drinking Water

Distribution system failure

• Main break, cross-connections, back-siphonage, backflow (20% of pollution events and 50% of outbreaks in France), pressure change due to fire hydrant flushing or usage

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40Groundwater

Distribution System

Treatment Deficiencies

Unknown

Waterborne Disease OutbreaksWaterborne Disease Outbreaks

05

1015202530354045

1993-94 (%)

2000-01 (%)

Last barrier to water supply contamination

1993-4: 27% of WBO in the US traced to distribution systems

2000-01: 16%

Contamination of Drinking Water

Distribution system:

• Main break disinfection protocol

• Cross-connection control

Pathogen Breakthrough

Treatment process failure

• Filtration failure: protozoan

• Disinfection failure: bacteria/virus

Chronic failure: knowledge and training of operator or inadequate equipment

Temporary Failure: human or mechanical error

Pathogen Breakthrough

Treatment process failure

• Understanding the limitation of the plant process and operation, define CCPs, operational and log removal efficiency, particle counter

• Better communication with utility

Pathogen BreakthroughDistribution system failure

• With no barrier and shorter travel time before reaching the public

• Symptoms: Biofilm built-up, stagnant or dead-end lines, high turbidity and low chlorine residual

Pathogen BreakthroughDistribution system failure

• Distribution system monitoring - pressure, turbidity and residual

• Large buildings (institutions) monitoring,

• Consumer complaints

• Security

Waterborne Outbreak: Response and Protection

Detection and Response to Contamination

Detection:

• Monitoring failure– Inadequate microbial monitoring– Inadequate disease surveillance

• Reporting failure

Detection and Response to Contamination

Detection:

• Monitoring failure– E. coli is the primary indicator of

fecal pollution, but must be supported by other measurements such as heterotrophic bacteria, chlorine residual and turbidity

– Inadequate microbial monitoring: hospital and institution water especially for non-fecal pathogens

Detection and Response to Contamination

Detection:

• Monitoring failure– inadequate disease surveillance:

lack of active syndromic surveillance (Milwaukee) and inadequate passive monitoring

Detection and ResponseResponse

• False positive or negative– False Positive: no pathogen in water but

declared BWA due to other indications– False Negative: fail to detect pathogen

Detection and Response

2005 Vancouver:

• “…sample contained a small amount of fecal coliform…our initial assessment indicates that the most likely cause is the contamination of the sample itself during filling of the sample bottle…not prepared to take any chances with the health of our residents…”

Detection and Response

Australia – Sydney Water Crisis July to Sep 1998

• Three BWAs with high Crypto (376/100mL) and Giardia counts (3,952 cysts/100 mL) in finished water

• Cost $37 m in direct cost and $100 million in contingency costs

Detection and Response

Australia – Sydney Water Crisis

• NTU less than 0.02 confirmed by particle count

• Filter working properly meaning raw water must have 350,000 cysts per 100 L (raw sewage)

Detection and Response

Australia – Sydney Water Crisis

• Survey found 64-74% of public complying with BWA, meaning 1 million residents drinking contaminated water

• Enhanced surveillance found no evidence of any increased in diarrheal disease or lab-diagnosed cases

Detection and Response

Australia – Sydney Water Crisis

• Cross-contamination in the lab

• Inquiry: “…when the public is told to boil tap water, it assumes the official directive is scientifically based, and necessary because of clear scientific evidence…yet…seems to be based on…better to be safe than sorry…”

Detection and Response

False Negative:

1994 Las Vegas Cryptosporidium outbreak

• 87 laboratory confirmed cases with 32 dead

• No elevated turbidity, no coliform and no oocysts were found in source or finished water

Detection and Response

Communication failure

• Roles and responsibilities• Food manufacturer, hospitals (engineering, pharmacy, food

services, house keeping), clinics (HIV, dialysis, cancer, pediatric, transplant), LTC, medical and dental associations, senior lodges, jails and correctional services, school boards, franchise restaurant and retail store offices, food safety info lines, water haulers, water depots, swimming pools, family and social services (day care), family day home organizations, shopping malls, major tourist sites, airport authority and caterers, primary food processors (tofu, mushroom, produce, sandwich, soy milk, non-carbonated beverages), commissaries, water vending machines, ice and bottled water manufacturers

Detection and Response

Response - Chemical

• Disinfection by- product (water avoidance advisory)

• Other chemicals

Man-made chemical

Affecting children

Impact future generations

Victim identifiable

Cannot detect

New and exotic

Cancer causing (consequence)

Uncertain in science

Chronic and delayed effect

Individual personally at risk

Exceedance does not necessary mean immediate health concern

MUST understand the numbers

Carcinogen, based on 10-5 lifetime risk ranged from 15.8 to 48.5 µg/L using Risk Specific Dose calculation based on linearized multistage (LMS) method, rounded off to give 16 µg/L

BDCM

Disinfection By-Products

THM - 100 µg/L (with target of 80 µg/L)BDCM - 16 µg/LHAA – 80 µg/LBromate – 10 µg/LChlorate – 1.0 mg/LChlorite – 1.0 mg/L

DBP

Reduce DBP levels in drinking water as low as possible without compromising the disinfection process

THM and BDCM should be used as surrogates to provide some indication of the potential for DBP formation

Prevention

Protection

Recommended