MRCSP Overview and Large Scale CO Storage in the Mt. Simon ... · DOE Annual Partnership Review...

Preview:

Citation preview

DOE Annual Partnership Review MeetingDecember 12, 2007

MRCSP Overview and Large Scale CO2 Storage in the Mt. Simon Reservoir

David BallMRCSP Project Manager

Managing Climate Change and Securing a Future for the Midwest’s Industrial Base

DOE Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC26-05NT42589

The MRCSP Region: The Nation’s Engine Room

• One in Four Americans• 1/5 of U.S. Electricity Supply

• ¾ From Coal• ~830 Million Tons of CO2/year• ~340 Large Point Sources of CO2

• One in Four Americans• 1/5 of U.S. Electricity Supply

• ¾ From Coal• ~830 Million Tons of CO2/year• ~340 Large Point Sources of CO2

Three Phase II terrestrial field efforts are being conducted

CroplandsCroplands

Reclaimed MinelandsReclaimed Minelands

WetlandsWetlands

Four Phase II geologic field efforts are being conducted

Appalachian Basin SiteAppalachian Basin Site

Cincinnati Arch SiteCincinnati Arch Site

Michigan Basin SiteMichigan Basin Site

Ohio Deep WellOhio Deep Well

MRCSP Membership

U.S. Department of Energy/NETL

Upcoming Events• Injection test in Michigan (~Dec 2007 – Jan 2008)• Complete injection test plan for Burger

– Compression and injection from Powerspan source– Liquid CO2 from commercial source

• Drill injection well at East Bend (Late 2007 – early 2008)• Complete injection permits for Burger and East Bend• Injection testing at Burger (start ~ late summer 2008)• Injection testing at East Bend (start ~ late 2008)• Update web site to improve tracking of demos• Continue soil sampling and analysis for terrestrial tests

Proposed Phase III Geologic Test Sites

• Primary site– Inject 1 million tons of CO2

over a four-year period– Target is the Mt. Simon

reservoir, the largest deep saline target in our region.

• Optional site– Possible 2 million tons of

CO2 injection over four-year injection period

– Multiple injection zones and caprock layers

Ethanol Plant in Ohio

IGCC in Indiana

The TAME ethanol plant in Greenville, Ohio has been selected as the primary MRCSP Phase III test site

• TAME is a joint venture of The Andersons Inc. and Marathon Petroleum Company

• The Greenville plant is designed to produce 110 million gallons of ethanol per year

• As a result it will produce an estimated 280,000 tons of injection grade CO2 per year

• Plant startup is expected to occur early in 2008

• CO2 Injection operations are expected to begin in early FY ‘10

Greenville, Ohio

TAME Site

Location of TAME Site

MRCSP Phase III Site Layout

Grain Storage AreaGrain Storage Area

FermentationFermentation

Potential Well Site and Potential Well Site and Compressor StationCompressor Station

AdministrationAdministration

CO2 Vent StackCO2 Vent Stack

Rail AccessRail Access

Existing Power Plant

IGCC Site

Duke Property Line

Duke’s IGCC plant near Edwardsport, Indiana has been selected as an optional Phase III site

• 640 MW IGCC Power Plant• ~500,000 tons of CO2 per year• Plant startup scheduled for late 2011• CO2 injection operations could start in early 2012

Edwardsport, IN

Site of IGCC Plant

Location of Duke’s IGCC Plant

Geologic Characteristics of Proposed MRCSP Phase III Test Sites

Parameter TAME Ethanol Duke IGCCGeologic Setting Cincinnati Arch Illinois BasinSed. Total Thickness 3600 8600Primary Target Mt. Simon Mt. SimonLithology Quartz Sandstone SandstoneTarget Depth Interval (ft) 3300-3600 7500-8600Total Thickness (ft) 300 1100Avg. Porosity 0.12 0.1Avg. Perm. (mD) 50-400 10-200Formation Pressure (psi) ~1450 ~3525Formation Temperature (F) 88 130Secondary Target none Knox Carbonates

Geologic Setting of Proposed MRCSP Phase III Test Sites

TAME(Primary)

Duke IGCC(Optional)

Comprehensive site characterization is planned for the Phase III test

• Regional geology• Seismic Survey• Test well Drilling• Rock core sampling/tests• Wireline logging• Rock-Water Testing• Geomechanical Analysis• Reservoir Testing• Reservoir Simulations

Phase III Measurement, Monitoring and Verification

• A comprehensive MMV program is planned for the large scale Phase III project.

• Specific design will be based on field data obtained in site characterization.

Depth (ft bgs)

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

Storage Formation

Injection TestWell

Depth (ft bgs)

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

Storage Formation

Depth (ft bgs)

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

Storage Formation

Injection TestWell

Na

Ca K

9 0 10

90

80

2 0

80

7 0

3 0

7 0

6 0 40

60

5 0 5 0

50

4 0 6 0

4 0

30

70

30

2 0 8 0

20

1 0 9 0

10

Brine Chemistry andFluid Sampling

Wireline, Coring and Mechanical Integrity

System Monitoring

36 50

37 00

37 50

38 00

38 50

39 00

39 50

0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 10 0

T ime (Da y s)

Pre

ssu

re (P

SI)

0

20

40

60

80

10 0

12 0

14 0

Tem

per

atu

re (*

F)

Multi-level Monitoring

1460

1480

1500

1520

1540

1560

1580

1600

1620

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Days

Pres

sure

(PSI

)

Pressure1Pressure2Pressure3Pressure4

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

0 10 20 30 40 5 0 60 70

Days

Tem

pera

ture

(F)

Temp1Temp2Temp3Temp4

Pressure Temperature

Deep MonitoringWell

Cross-well or3D Seismic

Surface Flux and Soil Gas Probes

Borehole Tiltmeters

Not Shown:

• Wellhead Monitoring

• Acoustic Emissions

Phase III Monitoring Options

Thank You

Recommended