Low-Pressure Membrane Contactors for Carbon …...Low-Pressure Membrane Contactors for Carbon...

Low-Pressure Membrane Contactors for Carbon Dioxide Capture

DE-FE0007553

−Richard Baker, Ken Chan, Brice Freeman, Don Fulton, Jennifer Ly,

Pingjiao Hao, Jay Kniep, Vincent Nguyen, Ivy Huang (MTR)

−Glenn Lipscomb, Terry Lou (University of Toledo)

NETL CO2 Capture Technology Meeting Thursday July 31, 2014

Project Overview

• Award name: Low-Pressure Membrane Contactors for CO2 Capture • Project period: 10/1/11 to 9/30/14 • Funding: $ 3.0 million DOE; $1.0 million MTR • DOE project manager: Mike Mosser • Participants: MTR, University of Toledo • Project scope: Develop compact large membrane area (> 500 m2), low

pressure drop plate-frame sweep module for CO2 capture application. • Project plan: The key project work organized by budget period is as follows:

– BP1: Construct prototype laboratory modules (20m2), select components, develop fabrication technology.

– BP2: Scale up production to 1m x 1m pilot scale modules (100m2), demonstrate with lab test system that modules meet CO2 separation performance and pressure drop targets.

– BP3: Scale up to full scale module (> 500 m2), show modules meet all performance targets. Be ready to test at NCCC.

2

MTR CO2 Capture Team

3

Tim Merkel Director of R&D

Xiaotong Wei 1MWe Demo Project

DE-FE0005795

Prof. Glenn Lipscomb

U. Toledo

CFD – Tomography Studies Module Design

Membrane Production

Group – Steve White Jennifer Ly

Engineering Support –

Saurabh Pande Don Fulton

Module Production and Testing –

Ivy Huang Ken Chan

Vincent Nguyen

Device Development

Brice Freeman Membrane Hybrid Project

DE-FE0013118

Pingjiao Hao MTR CFD &

U Toledo Liaison

Jay Kniep Project Manager

Richard Baker Project PI

DE-FE0007553

4

A separation is performed at a minimal energy cost.

The MTR Membrane Contactor

A Way of Generating an Affordable (Partial) Pressure Difference

10

Coal Power Plant with a Membrane CO2 Pre-Concentrator

5

Coal Power Plant with a Membrane CO2 Pre-Concentrator

6

Current Approach Uses Modified Spiral-Wound Modules

7

Each module contains 20 to 50 m2 of membrane.

Module Pressure Drop is Key

• 1 psi = 3 MWe for a 500 MWe plant

• Best spirals still have a 4 psi pressure drop on the sweep side

• Need to develop a module for this application

8

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Sweep SidePressure Drop (psi)

Year

Spiral Wound Modules

Plate and Frame Module

Project TargetArea

The Issues and Solutions

9

– Skid packing density

– Manifolding

– Footprint

– A sweep process

– Needs low pressure drop

Large area modules, compact skids

Needs wide, straight channels on both sides of the membrane

Two Membrane Contactor Designs

10

Countercurrent

Cross-flow

– Most efficient – Difficult to make

– Uses 40% more membrane area – Easier to make

Progress to Date (DE-FE0007553)

11

• BP1 – Footprint: 0.3 m x 0.6 m – Modules: 20 m2

• BP2 and BP3 – Footprint: 1 m x 1 m – Modules: 100 m2

100 m2 Membrane Module

12

100 m2 Membrane Module Details

• 60 – 70 individual membrane envelopes

• Weighs 100 kg completely assembled

• Has ~200 m of glue line seals (no leaks)

• Has the equivalent membrane area of 5 – 8” spiral wound membrane modules

• Sweep side pressured drop <0.5 psi

13

Our Concept

14

A single 100 m2

module element

50 Module elements connected to make a 5000 m2 module

Large-Area Plate-and-Frame Modules

15

Membrane Module Skid Total Cost

$20/m2 $10/m2 $20/m2 $50/m2 + + =

50 Module elements connected to make a 5000 m2 module

16

Feed Direction

Sweep Direction

Membrane Contactor with Vessel

Test System

Membrane Module and Test System

500 m2 Skid for Testing at NCCC

17

18

100 m2 Module Sweep Side Pressure Drop

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0 20 40 60 80 100

Sweep air flow rate (SCFM)

Sweep sidepressure drop

(psid)

Module #8

2.5 psig

5 psig

12.76 psig

Feed side pressure

8 psig

12 psig

Sweep side air flow and pressure drop changes with membrane characteristics and operating conditions, but the effect is consistently small.

1 bar feed 1000 gpu

1 bar feed 2000 gpu

2 bar feed 1000 gpu

Module operating conditions

Various Module Flow Designs

Design

Membrane area needed compared to

countercurrent Countercurrent (CC)

100%

Cross-flow (XF)

137%

Partial countercurrent

108% Series cross-flow

126%

19

What’s Next

Accomplishments to Date • 100 m2 defect free modules made • Pressure drops reduced to < 0.5 psi. • Five module (500 m2) skid made and ready for

NCCC test. Next Steps • Test five module skid at NCCC • Scale up plan to get module skid cost to $50/m2

implemented. 20