View
221
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
1/103
Legal Writing
June 30, 2011
Little Rock, AR
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
2/103
Drafting a WinningAppellate Brief
Presenter: Gerry Schulze
Baker, Schulze, & Murphy
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
3/103
Selecting Issues
Identifying the Issues that Win on Appeal
Select your Best Two or Three What is the Court Likely to Consider Strength of Record Below Prejudicial Error Has the Court indicated interest in the
issue? The Caveat
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
4/103
Quotes
If Id had more time, my brief wouldhave been shorter.
Source unknown, but not original with me.Theres no such thing as a final draft,theres only the last draft done beforethe brief is due. Gerry Schulze
At least I think its original with me. I may haveheard it somewhere else, but I cant trace it.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
5/103
Limiting the Number of Arguments
Avoid the Kitchen Sink approach.Some recommend three points as themaximum.Others will let you get away with four. The problem is, sometimes you donthave the judgment [or psychic powers]to know what argument will work.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
6/103
Judge Arey
Appellate advocates must next exercise discretion and objectivedetachment in deciding which of these issues will be raised onappeal. One consistent admonition decries the kitchen sinkapproach of raising every conceivable issue on appeal. A
storm of arguments--good, bad, and indifferent--can convincethe judges that there is no merit to the case, even if buriedin the deluge is a winning nugget. A competent appellateadvocate will evaluate the issues accordingly, select[ing] withdispassionate and detached mind the issues that commonsense and experience tell him are likely to be dispositive. Hemust reject other issues or give them short treatment.
Arey, D. Franklin, Competent Appellate Advocacy and ContinuingLegal Education, Fitting the Means to the End, 2 J.App.Prac. &Process 27 (2000)
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
7/103
Standard of Review
Rules require you to lead off with this. After that, dont feel free to ignore it.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
8/103
A Concise Brief: Page Limits andOther Considerations
Arkansas: PagesFederal: WordsUsually, this should be no problem.In very complicated cases, it can be aproblem.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
9/103
Secrets to a successful argument:Persuading without Exaggeration
Lawyers write for different purposes,and it is essential to remember the
appropriate kind of writing for eachsegment of the brief.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
10/103
Kinds of Legal Writing
InformativePersuasiveFunctional
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
11/103
Informative
Letters to client Not necessarily simple but not legalese
Explain termsInteroffice memorandaOpinion letter understandable. disclaimers
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
12/103
Informative parts of the brief
Jurisdictional StatementStatement of the CaseStatement of Facts
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
13/103
Persuasive
Settlement Brochures Argument portion of Briefs Vary in complexity Probably the most time consuming of all
documents Different concerns with
Trial Courts Appellate Courts Administrative Agencies
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
14/103
Functional
This kind of document is one which issupposed to create a result
Will Deed Complaint Trust
Power of Attorney Contract Real Estate Documents
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
15/103
Functional part of briefs
Cover PageTable of ContentsTable of Authorities
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
16/103
Legalese
Some say, never use legaleseI say, use it advisedly.Legalese is particularly useful infunctional writing where it has anaccepted meaningEven Latin is appropriate in someoccasions
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
17/103
Characteristics of Legal Writing
Clarity Word choice
Organization Avoid Legalese where possible
In functional writing, legalese is often preferable In persuasive writing you can get by with it
when you have to In informative writing it will seldom do muchgood
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
18/103
Characteristics of Legal Writing
Conciseness Strunks advice, Make each word tell.
Sometimes you have to balance the needfor completeness and the need for concisewriting
Avoid repetition
As to page limits, remember, this is nothigh school. The Court does not expectyou to fill up your page limits.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
19/103
Pleadings
Pleadings are generally functionalrather than persuasive.
It is more important to comply with theform and to say all the right magicwords than to make your languageconcise or enjoyable.Pleadings are to be interpreted to dosubstantial justice.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
20/103
Characteristics of LegalWriting
Accuracy Accuracy of Facts
Check your sources Facts are often not what you know, but what
you can prove Frequent references to testimony, affidavits,
depositions, exhibits, and other evidence canhelp you maintain credibility as well as help youkeep accurate on the facts
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
21/103
Characteristics of Legal Writing
Accuracy of Authority Double check cites
Shepardize or Keycite
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
22/103
Characteristics of Legal Writing
Proper form Pay attention to Court Rules
Paper sizes and margins Captions Type size and font Spacing
Pay attention to the Bluebook and othersources Citation forms
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
23/103
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
24/103
References in the Office
Make your own booklet of informationyou need
Arkansas Bar Association SystemsPick out books you like and keep themhandy Greggs Strunk & White Elements of Legal Style
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
25/103
Grammar
I am about to or I am going to die, either expression is used.
Grammarian Dominique Bonhours, on hisdeathbed.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
26/103
Analyze languages by
comparison to foreign languagesProblem: Many of us dont actuallyknow another language.
Solution: We all know a little Latin,even though we should rarely resort toit.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
27/103
Res ipsa loquitur
Whats the Latin for thing or matter?Res ipsa loquitur . The thing speaks foritself.Res judicata. The matter is decided.In rem. Against the thingIn re. In the matter ofRebus sic stantibus. In thesecircumstances.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
28/103
How about day?
The legislature adjourns sine die.The legislators receive a per diem.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
29/103
Case Singular Plural Singular Plural
Nominative res res dies dies
Genitive rei rerum diei, die dierum
Dative rei rebus diei, die diebus
Accusative rem res diem dies
Ablative re rebus die diebus
Locative ? rebus ? diebus
Vocative res res dies dies
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
30/103
Analyze the normal by using the bizarre
We dont notice the normal.Sometimes the only way to look at thenormal is to compare it to aberrations.Examples of language usage in thebooklet, page 77 and following.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
31/103
Grammar
Systematic study and description of alanguage or dialect
Standard American English is a dialect Legalese is a subdialect of Standard AmericanEnglish
In English, the standard for grammar is set
by general acceptance in the community Compare French and Spanish, for example,in which proper usage is determined by
Academies.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
32/103
Grammar: Prescriptive and
Descriptive"Descriptive grammar " is the studyand description of a language as it is
actually used."Prescriptive grammar " is the study anddescription of a language as it "should"
be used.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
33/103
Grammar
"Should" implies that there is a right wayand a wrong way to use language. To the
scientific student of language, there is noform which is inherently right, and no formwhich is inherently wrong.
Right usage is simply usage which isaccepted by the language community asright.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
34/103
Style
Style is more than grammaticalcorrectness.
Develop your own style. It comes withpractice.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
35/103
Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges , Antonin Scalia
and Bryan Garner Recent (4/28/08) Very good book.Sections 39-54 dealwith style.Even the authorsdo not agree oneverything.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
36/103
Scalia and Garner
39. Value clarity above all otherelements of style
40. Use captioned section headings.41. Use paragraphs intelligently;signpost your arguments
42. To clarify abstract concepts, giveexamples
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
37/103
Scalia and Garner
43. Make it interesting.44. Banish jargon, hackneyedexpressions, and needless Latin.45. Consider using contractionsoccasionallyor not.
46. Avoid acronyms. Use the partiesnames.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
38/103
Scalia and Garner
47. Dont overuse italics; dont usebold type except in headings; dont use
underlining at all.48. Describe and cite authorities withscrupulous accuracy.49. Cite authorities sparingly.50. Quote authorities more sparinglystill.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
39/103
Scalia and Garner
51. Swear off substantive footnotesornot.
52. Consider putting citations infootnotesor not.53. Make the relevant text readilyavailable to the court.54. Dont spoil your product with poortypography.
Q i k i f f i i
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
40/103
Quick review of confusing pointsof grammarin case anyone is
interestedWho and whom.The subjunctive.Non-rules. Myths.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
41/103
Who and Whom
Who is a subject It is like I, he, she, or they.
Whom is an object It is like me, him, she, or them.
When who/whom is found in a clause,
the correct form depends on thefunction the word plays in that clause
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
42/103
Who and Whom
Give the prize to whoever wins.
Give the prize to whomever the judgeschoose.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
43/103
The Subjunctive
People tend to think of the subjunctiveas an obscure, incomprehensible verb
form in EnglishIt is somewhat difficult because most ofthe time theres no difference between
indicative and subjunctive forms.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
44/103
The Subjunctive
With the verb to be in the presenttense, the form is not am, is, or are
but be. ...that I be; that you be.With other present tense verbs, the onlydifference is in the third person singular,where the characteristic -s is missing. ..that he walk.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
45/103
The Subjunctive
In the past, the verb to be is alwayswere
. . . that I were; . . . that he were.
In the future, will becomes would
Otherwise, the form is identical to theindicative.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
46/103
The Subjunctive
Whats it for? Expression of necessity, demand, strong
request. It is necessary that these questions be
answered at once. I demand that I be allowed to attend the
meeting.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
47/103
The Subjunctive
Whats it for? Wish clauses
I wish I were going to the meeting Counterfactual statements
If statements followed by a statement that thespeaker suggests is not true.
Particularly useful in all kinds of arguments
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
48/103
Non-Rules/Myths
Do not end a sentence with apreposition
Never split an infinitiveNever begin a sentence with: And, but, or or
Because or however Never write a one sentence paragraph
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
49/103
Preposition
This is the sort of arrant pedantry up withwhich I will not put.
Winston ChurchillThe preposition often seems to stand at theend of the sentence or clause: 'I have lost thepen I write with .'
George Curme, Syntax, 566 (1931) Curme was a noted grammarian of the Germanic
languages. English is a Germanic language.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
50/103
Split Infinitive
To boldly go where no man has gonebefore. Of course, that is incorrect. It should be, where no one has gone before.
From: Garner on Language and Writing
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
51/103
Split Infinitive
Hardly any serious commentator believesthat infinitives should never be split. Thedispute is between those who believe thatsplit infinitives should be avoided when thiscan be done with no sacrifice of clarity ornaturalness, and those who believe that noeffort whatever should be made to avoid
them. Alt.Usage.English Frequently Asked Questionsentry on the split infinitive.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
52/103
And/But/Or at Beginning ofSentence
Bryan Garner challenged this mythbeautifully in Garner on Language and
Writing . He goes back to Chaucerand works forward, showing that goodwriters have always ignored this myth.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
53/103
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
54/103
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
55/103
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
56/103
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
57/103
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
58/103
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
59/103
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
60/103
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
61/103
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
62/103
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
63/103
Word Usage
Less/Fewer Conclusory
EnormityTherefore/Therefor
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
64/103
Problem with Non-rules
Too manyreaders
thinkthey areactuallyrules.
June Casagrande. Mortal Syntax 101: 101 Language Choices That Will Get You Clobbered by the Grammar Snobs--Even If You're Right
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
65/103
ConclusoryConclusory Greenwood v.Wierdsma, 741 P.2d 1079,1086, n3 (Wyo. 1987)
After painstaking deliberation,we have decided that welike the word "conclusory,"and we are distressed by itsomission from the Englishlanguage. We now proclaimthat henceforth "conclusory"is appropriately used inthe opinions of this court.Furthermore, its usage is
welcomed in briefs submitted forthis court's review. Webster's,take heed!
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
66/103
Style
Emphasis belongs at the beginning.Use short, simple sentences.
Use active verbs.Do not overstate.Do not offend.Make each word tell.
Avoid equivocal language.
f
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
67/103
Get someone else to proofread before printing the final draft
ll d h
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
68/103
Spelling errors can distract thereader.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
69/103
Pleadings
Pleadings are generally functionalrather than persuasive.
It is more important to comply with theform and to say all the right magicwords than to make your languageconcise or enjoyable.
Pleadings are to be interpreted to dosubstantial justice.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
70/103
Fact Pleading
Arkansas is a fact pleading state. You must plead facts sufficient to state a
cause of action Merely stating conclusions is not enough
The Federal System is Notice
Pleading This used to mean that a very skeletalcomplaint was adequate.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
71/103
Notice Pleading
The federal rules allow fairly vaguestatements of facts, but . . .
Recent changes in the discovery ruleshave made it advantageous to pleadfacts so that the initial disclosures will
be more complete.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
72/103
Matters which you must plead
Facts for jurisdiction Its usually not that important in state court,
but sometimesespecially in courts of limited
jurisdictionmay be essential. It never hurts.)Facts for venueIdentity of partiesFacts giving rise to the disputeNoticeIn some cases, such as contract cases,exhibits must be attached and properlyidentified
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
73/103
Necessary legalese
Sometimes it is necessary to useformulas to properly allege a fact
Upon information and belief . . . .
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
74/103
Unnecessary legalese and/or
It is obvious this problem has arisen because theinterrogatory employed an imprecise term, and/or ,
when precision was called for. The phrase has beenso soundly criticized as to have been driven almostentirely from current usage. At best it has beenlabeled equivocal , obscure and meaningless ,at worst slovenly , improper and a linguistic
abomination. It has no place in modern practice,least of all in discovery interrogatories. Borenv.Qualls, 284 Ark. 65 (1984) [citations omitted].
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
75/103
Briefs
You have to be careful to getthese right, because there is an
opposing counsel just looking for anymisstatement of fact, citation error,typographical error, unclear language,or any other fault that can be exploited
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
76/103
Citations
Citations are the way you tell the Courtthe authority for the legal arguments
you are making.Follow the applicable authority oncitation forms
Double check the citationsShepardize or electronically checkeach citation.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
77/103
Be Respectful and Professional
Finally, I am compelled to mention that the appellees intemperateresponse to the appellants rehearing petition was not onlyinappropriate but was vile and slanderous. He argues, among otherthings, that the majority was correct to allow the trial court to make acustody decision based on his perception of the appellants religiousbeliefs because not all religions are worthy of constitutional protection.He denigrates Mormons, asserting that Mormons practice incest andchild marriages, and proclaims that Wicca is a cult, not a religiousbelief. He admonishes that this court is committing a grievous errorif it allows cult activities to be protected and that the trial judgeappropriately ruled in this case after carefully considering the facts. Inlight of the appellees further illumination of this issue, I simply cannotsay that the trial courts decision was appropriate. I lament that this
court has accepted the appellees invitation to embark on a grandinquisition. Hicks v. Cook , dissent on denial of rehearing
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
78/103
Be Respectful and Professional
Walker contends that the brief submitted by Ligonshows a clear personal bias and is repletewith sarcasm and vituperation masquerading aslegal argument. Although we do not find anyimpermissible bias in this case, we agree with Walkerthat the Executive Directors brief is unprofessionalin tone and improper in some of its content. Ligonsbrief contains unnecessarily sarcastic remarks and,at one point, invites the court to look outside of therecord to examine matters that were not before thespecial judge. This is improper argument. Ligon, Executive Director Of The Supreme Court Committee
On Professional Conduct v. Walker (3/12/2009)
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
79/103
Purpose of Briefs
The overarching objective of a brief isto make the courts job easier. Every
other consideration is subordinate. Scalia and Garner, p. 59
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
80/103
Citations
Citations are the way you tell the Courtthe authority for the legal arguments
you are making.Follow the BluebookDouble check the citations
Shepardize or electronically checkeach citation.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
81/103
Order of Citations
There are some general guidelines in theBluebook, but they were written with law
journals in mind.Heres what Id suggest: Most helpful first. Most recent before older cases (the precedential
or persuasive effect is less likely to have beendiminished by more recent events) Controlling before persuasive
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
82/103
Controlling before persuasive
The Arkansas Supreme Court controls onquestions of Arkansas law.If there is no Arkansas Supreme Courtopinion, then you can go to the ArkansasCourt of AppealsThereafter, federal courts which haveinterpreted Arkansas law under the Erie doctrineThereafter other courts.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
83/103
Other Authority
A constitutional provision on pointcontrols.
In the federal system, theres hardly a wordof the Constitution that hasnt been workedover by the Courts
In the State system, there are a lot ofsurprises in the Arkansas Constitution
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
84/103
Other Authority
A statuteunless its unconstitutionalcontrols.Federal statutes may preempt state law.Thats a federal Constitutional doctrine, and itcan get very confusing.Statutes have often been interpreted in greatdetail, and it may be more persuasive to citea case relying on the statute than the statuteitself, especially where the language of thestatute does not clearly say what the Courtshave interpreted it to say.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
85/103
Secondary Authority
Law Reviews American Law Reports (ALR)
annotationsTreatises (some more respected thanothers)Hornbooks are usually somethingfrom Law School, but are occasionallypersuasive secondary authority.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
86/103
Procedural phrases
In re means in the matter of Thephrase is used in one name styles,
but when theres an adversary party, itshould be left outThe only procedural phrase that should
be used when there are two parties isex rel which means for the benefit of
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
87/103
Abbreviations
If the whole name of a party can beabbreviated by commonly recognized
initials, thats ok NLRB v. Widgets, Inc.
Bluebook, 18 th Ed. Rule 6.1(b)
Otherwise, do not abbreviate the firstword of a partys name
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
88/103
Abbreviations
In the text of the brief, as opposed to acitation sentence, there are only a few
words that should be abbreviated
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
89/103
Abbreviations
When not part of the text, additionalabbreviations are permitted.
This would most commonly be in aseparate citation sentence or a stringcite.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
90/103
Names of parties
With individuals, you usually just usethe last name.
Some foreign names createcomplications. Chinese names often start with the
surname. The tradition has been to givethe whole name.
Mao Zedong v. Li Po
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
91/103
Spanish and Portuguese Names
The surname is often composed ofthe first surname of each parent. Just
remember that the last name of JuanSnchez Rivera may be SnchezRivera. It gets confusing, and oftenenough the courts or the publishers getit wrong, too.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
92/103
Cases from other states
Some stateslike Arkansas until recentlyhave official reporters. Smith v. Jones , 343 Ark. 253, 55 S.W.3d 424
(1997).
Some states do not have official reporters.Then you just give the Wests cite, and put
the state in parentheses. Coyote v. Acme, Inc. , 854 P.2d 423 (Colo. 1983).
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
93/103
Cases from other states
The new blue book rule is to only useofficial reporters in the state in which
the brief is filed. Therefore, in an Oklahoma Court, Smith v.Jones would be Smith v. Jones, 55 S.W.3d424 (Ark. 1997).
Arkansas is going to give the Blue Bookwriters fits.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
94/103
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
95/103
Quotations
Remember the 50 word rule.When a letter is changed from upper to
lower case or vice versa, indicate thechange with brackets.When words are omitted, use threeperiods separated by spacesCitations go to the left margin after ablock quote
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
96/103
Table of Contents
I came across Elizabeth Blochs material for aTexas CLE.She said that some judges look to the tableof contents to see what the appeal is about.So she recommends fleshing out the tableof contents with all your points, and write the
points so the judge who starts with the tableof contents will know what your case is about.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
97/103
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
98/103
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
99/103
Statement of the Issues: Framing a
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
100/103
Statement of the Issues: Framing aPicture, not a Puzzle.
Bryan Garners article. All schemes have drawbacks. Garners
drawback is that it requires too muchwork. Honestly, Im frequently too lazyto do it right.Still, if youre simply aware of thismethodology it will improve youranalysis.
Writing the Statement of Facts with
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
101/103
Writing the Statement of Facts withSimplicity and Relevance
Take off your advocate hat.Hold it behind your back.
Tell the story objectively, but make sureto get in all the details that the court isgoing to hear.That means getting the bad stuff outup frontunless youre certain youropponent has forgotten it.
Footnotes and Authority Citations
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
102/103
Footnotes and Authority Citations Again, Scalia and Garner are excellent.Even when they disagree they are veryinformative.If theres any doubt, opt againstfootnotes in Arkansas appellate courts.Ive used footnotes in trial courts tomake sure Ive raised all the issues.
Ive used footnotes in appellate briefsto discuss matters I contend are not atissue, when I expect opposing counselto try to make those points.
8/11/2019 Legal Writing June 30 2011 Gerry Schulze.pdf
103/103
The End
Thank you for coming to
see the show.
Recommended