View
216
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Jurisdictionally Jurisdictionally Blind SafetyBlind Safety
Doug Bish
OTCDC
March 8th
Oregon KA (Fatal + Severe Injury Crashes) 2009-2011
213648%
120827%
110625%
State Highways
Urban Non-state
Rural Non-state
•About 900 of the rural FA crashes are on 26,000* miles of County Roads
•About 300 or so non-state FA crashes are on 30,000* miles of tribal lands, BLM, Forest Service, local access and other roads
•About 1100 of the urban FA crashes are on 10,000* miles of City Streets
2100+ FA crashes are on 8000* miles of State Highways
*About 74,000 total public miles
Safety in OregonSafety in Oregon
Map -21 – Major Themes for Map -21 – Major Themes for HSIPHSIP• Emphasizes goal to reduce Fatal and serious
injury crashes• Emphasizes spending on all public roads• Increased Funding for Highway Safety
Improvement Program (HSIP)• Requires Performance Based Measures
(States set Targets)– Fatal and Serious injury Crashes per VMT– Number of Fatalities and Serious Injuries
• New roadway data and highway basemap requirements
• Maintains emphasis on data-driven approach
Jurisdictionally Blind SafetyJurisdictionally Blind Safety
ODOT met with representatives of the League of Oregon Cities (LOC) and the Association of Oregon Counties (AOC)--
• Discussed the need for developing a safety program for all public roads
• Discussed moving towards a jurisdictionally blind safety program
• Memorandum of Understanding between ODOT, AOC and LOC
Program PrinciplesProgram Principles• Reduce Fatal and
Serious Injury crashes• Address safety on all
public roads• Data driven • Blind to jurisdiction• Overseen by ODOT
Regions• Commitments to current
STIP maintained
Funding PrinciplesFunding Principles• Allocated to each ODOT Region• Strive for Proportional between
urban and rural• Support Fatal and Serious injury
crash reductions• A portion to
behavioral strategies
Project Selection PrinciplesProject Selection Principles
• Focus on fatal and serious injury reduction
• Primarily developed and overseen by ODOT
• Regional project selection must engage local jurisdictions
• Combine projects on state and local roads where possible
• Follow principles of practical design
Transition PrinciplesTransition Principles
• Funding for jurisdictionally blind starts in 2017
• A transition program should be developed to bridge the gap from 2013 to 2017
• The transition should focus on a few systemic fixes
• All parties should engage to develop a selection process
Safety Funding for Local Safety Funding for Local RdsRds• For 2013-2015 (Transition)
– Allocate $10 million HSIP to local roads over three years
– Allocate $1 million/year for strategies in TSAP
• For 2016 (Transition)– Allocate $6 million HSIP to local roads– Allocate $1 million for strategies in TSAP
• For 2017 and beyond– Implement “jurisdictionally
blind” safety program
Funding for Local Roads 2013-Funding for Local Roads 2013-20162016
Region Splits* 2013 - 2015 2016 Total
1 46.6% $4,663,540 $2,798,124 $7,461,665
2 27.3% $2,731,536 $1,638,921 $4,370,457
3 14.6% $1,458,382 $875,029 $2,333,411
4 7.5% $754,982 $452,989 $1,207,972
5 3.9% $391,559 $234,936 $626,495
Total $10,000,000 $6,000,000 $16,000,000
*Splits based on F&A crashes on local roads
Transition ProgramTransition Program
• ODOT will hire a consultant to facilitate the process in each region
• Local Jurisdictions will be asked to participate in selection of a few key systemic measures in each region
• Kick-off Meetings will occur in Apr-May 2013
• ODOT regions will be in charge of delivering the projects
Region 22467 F&A
Urban365
State Highways1302
County Roads682
City Streets483
Rural937
Intersection174 Non-
Intersection191
Top 4Rear-End 42Fixed Obj 42
Ped 36Head-on 27
Top 4 Turning 28Angle 11
Ped 8Rear-End 4
Top 4Turning 31Angle 22Ped 19
Rear-End 17
Stop52
Signal93
Ped/Bik
100*
Intersection203 Non-
Intersection734
Other/unk47
Top 4Fixed Object 322
Head-on 162Rear-End 66SS Meet 51
Top 4Turning 61Angle 42
Fixed Obj 13Rear-End 10
Top 4Angle 8
Turning 7Ped 3
Rear-End 3
Stop134
Signal22
Ped/Bik37*
Other/unk29
ROR532*
Stakeholders will review regional data:
Number of Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes (F&A) 2007-2011 Crash Data (Five Years)ODOT Region 2 – State Highways
Examples of Systemic Measures for Examples of Systemic Measures for Roadway DepartureRoadway Departure
Curve Warning Signs with Speed Riders 13% All $500-$700 per sign
Oversize Curve Warning Signs 18% All $500-$600 per sign
Chevrons Placed in Accordance with 2009 MUTCD 20%-35% All (dependent on facility type) $300-$500 per sign
Centerline Rumble Strips 14% All Rural 2-Lane Roads $700-$900 per mile
Centerline Rumble Strips 21% Head on & Sideswipe $700-$900 per mile
Shoulder Rumble Strips 16%/33% All Rural MultiLane/ two lane $700-$900 per mile
Edgeline Rumple Strips 33% All Rural two-lane $3-5K per mile (includes striping)
First Time Installation of Delineators Where None Existed Before
11%/34%/67%
All/Run off Road/ Head-On
500 ft curve = $210-$4201,000 ft curve = $270-$540
Transition Program - Transition Program - TimingTimingTiming of the projects still needs
to be worked out-• Regions likely to go through
selection process with local stakeholders in summer of 2013
• Project scoping and development in late 2013
• Actual projects delivered in 2014
Questions?Questions?
Recommended