View
0
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
HRTPO Board Meeting │ March 19, 2015 │ Agenda
ITEM #9: I-64/HIGH RISE BRIDGE CORRIDOR STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: VDOT
In March 2013, the HRTPO 2034 Long-Range Transportation Plan was amended to include an environmental study for the improvement of the Interstate 64 (I-64) corridor from I-464 to I-264/I-664 at Bowers Hill, including the High Rise Bridge. VDOT, in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the U.S. Coast Guard, completed the Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Interstate 64/High Rise Bridge Corridor Study on October 6, 2014 and it was made available for public review and comment through November 21, 2014. A location public hearing for the project was held on November 6, 2014. At the November 2014 HRTPO Board meeting, VDOT provided a presentation on the results of the Draft Environmental Assessment (EA), which analyzed potential environmental impacts associated with any alternatives developed to address transportation capacity needs and improve roadway and bridge conditions throughout the corridor. The draft EA includes the following No-Build and Mainline Candidate Build Alternatives (CBAs) and two fixed-bridge options (95 feet and 135 feet):
1. No-Build Alternative 2. CBA1 - Eight Lane Build Alternative – No Toll 3. CBA2 - Eight Lane Build Managed Alternative – High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) 4. CBA2 - Eight Lane Build Managed Alternative – High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) 5. CBA2 - Eight Lane Build Managed Alternative – All Tolled
A VDOT brochure on the study and a table summarizing the Level of Service (LOS) of the various alternatives are attached. In addition, the Draft EA and associated technical documents may be accessed on the VDOT website at: http://www.virginiadot.org/projects/hamptonroads/i-64_-_high_rise_bridge_corridor_study.asp.
The Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) has expressed an interest in knowing the preferred alternative and bridge height option selected by the HRTPO and HRTAC prior to making its decision on those issues in April 2015. HRTPO Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) members were requested to review the available materials, coordinate with their respective HRTPO Board members, and make a recommendation regarding a preferred alternative and bridge height option. At the March 4, 2015 meeting, the TTAC recommended CBA2 – Eight Lane Build Managed Alternative, with a 95 foot bridge height. The TTAC made no recommendation regarding HOV, HOT, or tolling.
Mr. Scott Smizik, VDOT Location Studies Project Manager, will brief the HRTPO Board on this item.
Attachment 9
A Resolution for approval is included with Meeting Agenda Item #14.
Location Public Hearing
Interstate 64 / High Rise Bridge Corridor StudyThursday, November 6, 2014Tidewater Community College 120 Campus DrivePortsmouth, VA 237014:30 p.m. - 7:30 p.m.
www.VirginiaDOT.org
As part of the Interstate 64 / High Rise Bridge Corridor
Study, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT),
in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) as the lead federal agency, and the United States
Coast Guard as a cooperating agency, have evaluated
alternatives to improve transportation conditions along
the Interstate 64 (I-64) corridor between the Interstate 464
(I-464) interchange and the Interstate 664 (I-664) and
Interstate 264 (I-264) interchanges at Bowers Hill in the
City of Chesapeake, Virginia. Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, (NEPA) and
in accordance with FHWA regulations, an Environmental
Assessment (EA) has been prepared to analyze the
potential social, economic, and environmental effects
associated with the retained alternatives.
The purpose of this hearing is to provide a public
opportunity for any person, acting on his/her own behalf
or representing a group or governing body, to offer
comments or submit written material concerning the
proposed alternatives. We invite you to review the findings
of the study and discuss the project with VDOT
representatives who are here to answer your questions.
To view the meeting materials, comment online, or for
future updates, please visit the study website at:
www.64highrise.org
Purpose – Based on the existing and future transportation conditions, the purpose of the study is to develop alternatives to address transportation capacity and improve roadway and bridge conditions throughout the corridor. To meet this purpose, the following needs are being considered:
• Improve capacity;• Enhance corridor safety; • Address the High Rise Bridge improvements; and,• Improve the ability of the corridor to function as a key emergency evacuation route.
From: I-64/I-464 interchange
To: I-64/I-264 interchange at Bowers Hill
Total length: Approximately 8 miles
State Project – 0064-131-783; UPC: 104366
Welcome
Project Overview
Attachment 9
Study Area
Alternatives Retained for Detailed Study
The alternatives retained for detailed analysis in the EA
include a No Build Alternative and two mainline build
alternatives with two fixed bridge options.
No Build Alternative
In accordance with the regulations implementing NEPA, the
No Build Alternative has been retained for evaluation in the
EA to serve as a benchmark for the comparison of future
conditions and impacts. The No Build Alternative would
retain the existing I-64 interstate, associated interchanges,
and the High Rise Bridge in their present configurations
and allow for routine maintenance and safety upgrades.
Eight Lane Build Alternative
The Eight Lane Build Alternative would include
construction of four additional lanes of capacity (two lanes
in each direction) on I-64 within the study limits. Wherever
possible, the additional lanes would be constructed towards
the existing median. The widening of I-64 to eight lanes
also would require the reconstruction of ramps, bridges
interchanges, and culverts along the retained alternative
corridor. Preliminary costs range from $1.86 billion for the
95-foot bridge to $2.22 billion for the 135 foot bridge.
Eight Lane Build – Managed Alternative
The Eight Lane Build – Managed Alternative would be
similar to the Eight Lane Build Alternative; however, some
or all of the travel lanes would be managed using tolls and/
or vehicle occupancy. Additionally, expanded local/express
bus service or bus rapid transit could be accommodated
with this alternative in the general purpose or the managed
lanes. Preliminary costs range from $1.92 billion for the 95
foot bridge to $2.30 billion for the 135 foot bridge. The
increased cost compared to the Eight Lane Build Alternative
is based on the additional pavement necessary to separate
the managed and general purpose lanes.
There have been no specific operational scenarios identified
at this stage of the study. Accordingly, the following three
operational scenarios were developed to establish a sample
range of travel demand conditions: High Occupancy Vehicle
(HOV), High Occupancy Toll (HOT) and All Tolled.
For the purpose of this study, potential impacts associated
with the Eight Lane Build - Managed Alternative assume
the same footprint as the Eight Lane Build Alternative. The
HOV and All Tolled lane scenarios would fit within the area
of impact. If a specific managed lane scenario is identified
as the Preferred Alternative, impact estimates could be
updated in the Revised EA and associated technical reports.
Bridge Options
Two fixed-span bridge options, measuring 95 feet and
135 feet at mean high water, are under consideration.
Both options would include two new bridges, one built
on existing alignment and one built south of the existing
bridge alignment. These options include consideration of
widening the horizontal clearance from 125 feet to 135
feet. The Eight Lane Build Alternative planning level bridge
cost is $405 million for the 95 foot bridge and $635 million
for the 135 foot bridge. The Eight Lane Build - Managed
Alternative planning level bridge cost is $425 million for the
95 foot bridge and $670 million for the 135 foot bridge.
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$$$$
$$
$$
$$
$ $
$
$
$$
$$
$
$
ab
Eliz
etR
h
iv
er
(Souterh
n Br
can
h)
Bowers Hill
§̈¦664
Interchange
§̈¦264
1£¤13
5£¤58
46£¤460
§̈¦64
46£¤4601£¤13
§̈¦4641£¤17
10¬«104
46£¤460
16¬«166
«
J
1£¤13
OLL IFF RD
S MILITA
RY HWY
BAI
NBR
IDG
E B
LVD
DOM
INIO
N BL
VD
CANAL DR
GEO
RGE
WAS
HING
TON
HWY
CAV
ALI
ER
BL V
D
HWRY
Y
S MILITA
AIRLINE BLVD
GAL
BE
RR
HO
MES
TEA
D R
D
RY DO
LD M
ILL RD
GE
OR
GE
WA
SH
ING
TON
HW
Y
GREAT BRIDGE BLVD
BA
INB
RID
GE
BLV
D
MOSES
S MILITARY HWY
D GRAN Y TRL
1£¤17
1£¤13 46£¤460
GreSawt aDmispmal
High Rise Bridge
$ I-64 E (Westbound travel direction)
0 10.5 1.50.25Miles
I-64 W $ (Eastbound travel direction)
Figure 1 Study AreaInterstate 64/High Rise Bridge Corridor Study
Environmental AssessmentCity of Chesapeakethat must be analyzed in the NEPA document. It does not imply right-of-way take or construction impact.
Mapping Source: VDOT and City of Chesapeake
Isle of Wight
Suffolk
NewsNewport
Hampton
Chesapeake
PortsmouthNorfolk
25£¤8
1£¤7
Virginia Beach
1£¤7
§̈¦664
6£¤0
§̈¦64
1£¤35£¤8
46£¤0
§̈¦64
§̈¦664
1£¤7
5£¤8
§̈¦264 §̈¦64
46£¤01£¤3
1£¤3§̈¦464
5£¤8§̈¦264
James River ChesBaapyeake
*
Great Dismal Swamp
State Project Number: 0064-131-783, P101; UPC: 104366Federal Project Number: NH-IM-064-3(481)
I 64/High Rise BridgeCorridor Study Area*
Water Bodies
The study area is a buffer around the road corridor that includes all natural, cultural and physical resources
N
168I-64/High Rise Bridge Corridor Study Area*
Water Bodies
Great Dismal Swamp
N*The study area is a buffer around the road corridor that includes all natural, cultural and physical resources that must be analyzed in the NEPA document. It does not imply right-of-way take or construction impact.
Attachment 9
Typical Sections:Eight Lane Build Alternative
Schedule
Typical Sections:Eight Lane Build – Managed Alternative
I-64 West of US 17
I-64 East of US 17
Eight Lane Bridge (Two Four-Lane Bridges)
I-64 at Battlefield Blvd
I-64 Between I-464 Interchange and Battlefield Blvd
Legend Existing Lanes Proposed Lanes
I-64 West of US 17
I-64 East of US 17
Eight Lane Bridge (Two Four-Lane Bridges)
I-64 at Battlefield Blvd
I-64 Between I-464 Interchange and Battlefield Blvd
STUDYINITIATION
CITIZEN INFORMATION
MEETING (SCOPING)
LOCATION PUBLIC
HEARING
COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION
BOARD REVIEW
REVISED ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT
FHWA DECISION*
DRAFTENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
WE’RE HERE NOW
JULY 2013 SEPTEMBER 2013 OCTOBER 2014 NOVEMBER 2014 JAN/FEB 2015 SPRING 2015
*Currently programed in the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization’s Constrained Long Range Plan. Once the next phase is properly documented in the Transportation Improvement Program and the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program, VDOT can request a decision from FHWA on the study - anticipated Spring 2015.
Attachment 9
© 2013 Commonwealth of Virginia
Tonight: Your questions and comments are important
to us. Please fill out a comment form and drop it into
the box before you leave.
Mail: If you are not ready to submit your comments
tonight, you may submit them by November 21, 2014
to:Scott Smizik
Virginia Department of TransportationEnvironmental Divison1401 E. Broad StreetRichmond, VA 23219
E-Mail: You can email your comments to
I64HighRise@vdot.virginia.gov
Online: For more information or to comment online,
please visit the study website: www.64highrise.org
Category
Eight Lane BuildAlternative
Eight Lane Build – Managed Alternative
Bridge Height Bridge Height
95 ft. 135 ft. 95 ft. 135 ft.
Partial Acquisitions 163 157 163
Full Acquisitions 70 70 70 70
Displacements 69 69 69 69
Section 4(f) Properties (acres) 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12
Non Tidal Streams (linear feet)
5,098.00 5,098.00 5,098.00 5,098.00
Tidal Streams (acres) 2.14 1.88 2.14 1.88
Wetlands (acres) 22.37 20.80 22.37 20.80
Floodplains (acres) 33.89 29.73 33.89 29.73
Forest and Vegetation (acres) 272.52 268.75 272.52 268.75
Planning Level Total Construction Cost $1.86 billion $2.22 billion $1.92 billion $2.30 billion
If project design advances, and right-of-way impacts are better understood, VDOT will develop a detailed relocation plan for all displaced residents, businesses, and non-profit organizations. Information about right-of-way purchase is discussed in VDOT’s brochure, “Right-of-Way and Utilities: A Guide for Property Owners and Tenants.” The document is available online at: http://www.vdot.virginia.gov/business/resources/Right_of_way/A_Guide_for_Property_Owners_and_Tenants.pdf
157
For additional information on potential impacts, see Section 3.0 (Environmental Consequences) of the EA and associated technical reports and memorandums.
Representatives from VDOT are present to discuss the
project and answer your questions. It is the responsibility
of VDOT to ensure that all members of the community
are afforded the opportunity to participate in public
decisions on transportation projects and programs
affecting them. VDOT ensures nondiscrimination in all
programs and activities in accordance with Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964.
If you need more information or special assistance for
persons with disabilities or limited English proficiency,
contacts VDOT’s Civil Rights Office at 757-925-2519 (TTY/
TDD users call 711).
Summary of Potential Impact
Provide Your Comments and Stay Informed Civil Rights
Attachment 9
Levels of Service (LOS) from
"Interstate 64 / High Rise Bridge Corridor Study, Environmental Assessment" (EA)
source: Traffic & Transportation Technical Report, VDOT, Oct. 2014
compiled by HRTPO Staff
February 2015
Abbreviations
"EA" = Environmental Assessment
"CBA" = Candidate Build Alternative
"GP" = General Purpose
"HOT" = High‐Occupancy / Toll, i.e. restricted to (free) HOVs and toll payers
I‐64 High‐Rise Bridge LOS (in GP lanes), year 2040
Lanes Toward Suffolk Toward Va. Beach
Alternatives GP HOV HOT AM PM AM PM
1. No‐Build 4 0 0 F F F F
2. CBA1 ‐ Eight Lane Build‐ No Toll 8 0 0 C D D D
3. CBA2 ‐ Eight Lane Build Managed ‐ HOV 6 2 0 D D E D
4. CBA2 ‐ Eight Lane Build Managed ‐ HOT* 4 0 4 F E E E
5. CBA2 ‐ Eight Lane Build Managed ‐ All Tolled* 8 0 0 C C C C
*Tolled Lanes: "Low Toll" scenario: $1.44 for passenger vehicles, off‐peak (see EA for truck and peak rates).
Attachment 9
Recommended