View
40
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
IAEA CRP on 18 O (MIBA) and Planning for Tumbarumba. IPILPS Workshop ANSTO 18-22 April 2005. Overview of talk. Data acquisition - How did we get to where we are today? The MIBA network IAEA and other planning meetings ANSTO’s contribution Why Tumbarumba? Sampling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
IPILPS Workshop
ANSTO 18-22 April 2005
IAEA CRP on 18O (MIBA) and Planning for
Tumbarumba
Overview of talkOverview of talk• Data acquisition - How did we get to where
we are today? The MIBA network IAEA and other planning meetings ANSTO’s contribution Why Tumbarumba? Sampling a priori estimates and our working hypothesis
The MIBA networkThe MIBA network
• Moisture Isotopes in the Biosphere and Atmosphere
• Initiated at a meeting in Vienna, May 2004
• Building on GNIP (& GNIR) in collaboration with WMO
• Primary aim - to facilitate acquisition of data on stable isotopes in biospheric and atmospheric water.
Idealized distribution- 100 sites:90 continental, 10 oceanic (water vapor)
15
15
15
15
15 15
Moisture Isotopes in the Biosphere and Atmosphere (MIBA)IAEA
Moisture Isotopes in the Biosphere and Atmosphere (MIBA)
The MIBA networkThe MIBA network
• Objectives1 Regional scale hydrological budgets;
2 The partitioning of annual carbon fluxes;
3 The development of new global change indicators;
4 Ecosystem functioning;
5 Interpretations of 13C and 18O analyses in organic matter;
6 The validation of general circulation models; and
7 Past global responses to climate change.
The IAEA CRPThe IAEA CRP
• Title: Isotope methods for the study of water and carbon cycle dynamics in the atmosphere and biosphere
• 1st RCM this May in Vienna
The MIBA networkThe MIBA network
• IAEA Membership P. Aggarwal, Head, Isotope Hydrology Section IAEA
D, Yakir (Israel; Chair), G. Farquhar (Australia), L. Flanagan (Canada), F. Longstaffe (Canada), R. Siegwolf (Switzerland), G. Hoffman (France), H. Meijer (the Netherlands), H. Griffiths (UK), J. Berry (USA). P. Tans (USA), P. Ciais (France), N. Buchmann (Switzerland), L. Sternberg (USA), T. Dawson (USA), G. Lin (China), W. Stichler (Germany), J. White (USA), and J. Santruek (Czech Republic), Brent Helliker (USA), A. Henderson-Sellers (Australia).
The IAEA CRPThe IAEA CRP- the Australian contribution- the Australian contribution
• Routinely measure SI in Canberra vapour.
• Compare fortnightly 18O in grasses, trees, soil-water, rain and vapour near Canberra.
• Monitor 18O less frequently in grasses, trees, soil-water, rain and vapour at sites in the MDB & use these data to evaluate climate models and for model intercomparisons.
• Measure SI and chemistry in monthly rain-water samples across the continent.
• Characterisation of 18O in ground-water in relation to soil properties.
• Refine MDB water balance models using the data above.
ANSTO’s contribution to the ANSTO’s contribution to the CRPCRP
• IPILPS
• Water isotopologues 1H2
16O; 1H218O and 1H2H16O
• Comparison of LSS By output, and against real data
• Real field data required at appropriate time scales
• Not much exists….
Initial site selectionInitial site selection
• Ozflux sites in Murray Darling Basin (MDB)
Padthaway
TumbarumbaTumbarumba- Oz-flux tower- Oz-flux tower
• CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research, Dr. R. Leuning & Dr. H. Cleugh
TumbarumbaTumbarumba
• Bago Forest. 35ºS, 148ºE
• 1200 m
• Cool-temperate zone, MDB
• Dominant vegetation Eucalyptus delegatensis (Alpine Ash) with E. dalrympleana (Mountain Gum)
TumbarumbaTumbarumba
TumbarumbaTumbarumba• Routine measurements comprise:
temperature, humidity (bulk concentration of water vapour), wind (speed and direction), net radiation (both shortwave and longwave components), surface pressure, soil moisture and temp as well as the fluxes of (bulk) water vapour and heat.
Tumbarumba Tumbarumba - other major collaborators- other major collaborators
• University of Wollongong, Prof D. Griffith portable FTIR MS
• ANU, Prof G. Farquhar & Dr C. Keitel; Dr H. Stuart-Williams
leader of the IAEA CRP and of a research team interested in C and O isotope fractionation applications in plant physiology. Stable isotope analysis.
• CSIRO Forestry, Dr H. Keith primary interested in forest productivity
• CSIRO Land & Water, Dr A. Herczeg & Dr F. Leany; Dr J. Deighton
GNIP. Stable isotope analysis
What has ANSTO sampled?What has ANSTO sampled?• Precipitation, dew, surface soil, deeper soil, tree stem,
leaves and vapour at various heights above the ground, sampling most types hourly during daylight and less frequently at night over 5 days in early March 05.
• We will infer from our results surface water vapour fractionation (from soil-surface water
values, using the Craig & Gordon model) equilibrium transpired vapour and root zone water
fractionation (from stem water) non-equilibrium transpired vapour (from total flux and leaf
water)
Sample preparation and Sample preparation and analysisanalysis
• All samples were sealed and frozen or chilled in the field ASAP after collection.
• Vegetation samples will be vacuum distilled at ANSTO to collect unfractionated water (~ 2hrs per sample).
• Plant distillates, precipitation, dew and vapour condensates are being analysed for SWIs at ANU.
• A pyrolysis method is used. 2H <1 o/oo and 18O <0.3 o/oo precision.
Sample preparation and Sample preparation and analysisanalysis
• Soil waters are being analysed by CSIRO Land & Water in Adelaide following azeotropic distillation using kerosene to prevent fractionation. With CO2 equilibration the precision is <0.05 o/oo for 18O
• Total soil moisture has been measured at ANSTO by drying to constant weight. This will be followed by particle size analysis for soil characterisation.
Sampling - PrecipitationSampling - Precipitation
• Event-based precipitation was collected at ground level, using collection devices that ANSTO built according to an IAEA (2003) design
• Dew was collected several mornings from a plastic sheet laid on the ground
a prioria priori sample estimates sample estimates- Precipitation- Precipitation
• Should lie on the GMWL
2H = 8 x 18O + 10 o/oo
but will vary due to local conditions, particularly
distance from the source & altitude Estimates for Tumbarumba at 1300 m altitude
using an on-line calculator range from:
-4.8 to -7.2o/oo (18O) and -25 to -50o/oo (2H) with averages of -6.5 and -39o/oo
•http://www.waterisotopes.org/
• Lagged sample tubes were installed on the tower to nine heights (separate matched sets for our vapour & UoW’s FTIR)
• Filtered to prevent contaminants and blockage
Sampling - VapourSampling - Vapour
Sampling - VapourSampling - Vapour• Vapour tubes were attached to
ANSTO cold traps amended from Helliker et al (2002) design.
• Samples were collected hourly during daylight.
• Lower frequency at night due to lower vapour pressures
Sampling - VapourSampling - Vapour
• Last minute amendment based on advice from ANU.
• Installed a ground level sampler with a lid collecting input air at 10 m
• Lid removed between FTIR cycles to avoid humidity and temperature effects and replaced to allow signal to re-establish
a prioria priori sample estimates sample estimates- vapour- vapour
• Atmospheric vapour will be depleted with respect to precipitation depending upon the temperature (and hence altitude).
Temp C D 18O D 2H
5 11.15 99.80
10 10.66 93.39
15 10.20 87.39
20 9.76 81.77
• Soil vapour will be depleted along LEL compared to the soil water but will become more enriched and approach LMWL as time passes after rain (? Equilibrium?).
612.52)K
10(248.76)
K
10(844.24H
o
3
2o
62 D
0667.2)K
10(4156.0)
K
10(137.1O
o
3
2o
618 D
Majoube et al 1971
a prioria priori sample estimates sample estimates- soil vapour- soil vapour
• How will soil vapour change over time following rain? Percent H2O in surface soil will decline due to surface evaporation until it reaches a steady state due to replacement from
deeper water by capillary action Vapour from surface soil will initially be primarily affected by phase change (equilibrium fractionation). It will then enrich due
to kinetic fractionation as the proportion of heavy isotopes remaining in the surface water becomes larger. In addition, as the surface gets drier, diffusive fractionation will also come into play as vapour is formed and migrates from lower down the soil profile.
• Help from the audience on understanding this process more clearly would be appreciated
Sampling - soil waterSampling - soil water• Surface scoops ( 5cm incl
litter) were collected at the same time as, and adjacent to, leaf and stems samples. At hourly intervals during daylight.
• Cores taken 4 times per day to a depth of 1m. Samples were split for depth profile and then measured for moisture content or sent for SWI analysis.
a prioria priori sample estimates sample estimates
• Soil water Surface water will reflect any recent rainfall. It will
become more enriched over time due to evaporation. It should lie on the LEL.
Deeper samples will reflect heavy or longer rainfall and will be biased towards the depleted end of the LMWL range at the intercept with the LEL and will not be enriched. It is assumed this will be well mixed, not change dramatically with incident rainfall (eg Neal & Rosier 1990), and be equivalent to local seeps and xylem water (initial estimates -6o/oo 18O and -40o/oo 2H).
Sampling - xylemSampling - xylem Bark (phloem) must be removed to avoid
contamination with enriched leaf water and photosynthates.
The exposed end is cut off
by >2cm to minimise the
potential for exchange with
atmospheric vapour. The sample is cut into 1 cm sections to enhance
the ease of vacuum distillation. The stem is cut directly into a 12mL ‘Exetainer’
a prioria priori sample estimates sample estimates- xylem- xylem
• Should be unfractionated with respect to the root zone (deeper) soil water (estimates -6o/oo 18O
and -40o/oo 2H).
• The height of the sample should not matter. Hence, samples from the under story are OK.
• At equilibrium, should equal transpired water vapour (but this may only occur for a few hours each day).
• Leaf water Leaves in sunlight were preferred. An estimate of the hours of
sunlight exposure is made. Samples were quickly placed into
‘Exetainers’ Main vein was removed. Air temperature and cloud cover
estimates were also made.
Sampling - Leaf waterSampling - Leaf water
a prioria priori sample estimates sample estimates- leaf water- leaf water
• Will vary considerably diurnally due to stomatal opening (light, time and water potential dependent) and local climatic conditions including temperature, humidity, wind speed and incident radiation.
Pre-dawn, should be equivalent to xylem (~ -6o/oo 18O and ~ -40o/oo 2H.
Morning, should start to enrich to a maximum around noon in the order of 15-20o/oo
(D18O), 60-80 (D2H).
Afternoon, should plateau but then start to return to xylem values as stomata close.
Evening, relax back to xylem signature.
a prioria priori sample estimates sample estimates
• Transpired water At equilibrium, it is assumed that transpirate will be
equivalent to xylem/source water. Due to the lag induced by the enrichment of the
leaves in the morning and the relaxation of that enrichment in the afternoon, transpirate will be more depleted in the morning and more enriched in the afternoon (eg Harwood et al 1998). The degree of difference will depend on the overall water flux rates.
Harwood et al 1998
Plant, Cell & Environment
21 (3) 269-283)
Diurnal variation of (a) the 18O of transpired water vapour for leaves on day 1 () and day 2 ( ,,) indicating the vapour pressure deficit (VPD) status and general trend over the day (solid line).
(b) Evaporative site enrichment (e) for different leaves. Solid lines calculated using H2 18O of transpired vapour. Dashed lines represent the trendline fitted to the same data points assuming isotopic steady state (ISS) held throughout the day.
a prioria priori inferred estimates inferred estimates
• Vapour from soil water Should be depleted with respect to surface soil water
according to Craig & Gordon (1965) model (in the order of -10 to -12o/oo (D18O), -40 to -50o/oo (D2H)).
Should lie on the LEL. After rainfall it should become less depleted as the
surface soil water becomes more enriched and it should approach the LMWL.
What is the data to be used What is the data to be used for?for?
• A Evaluation of LSS output
• B Describing a three-point mixing model of dual-
isotope fractionation in vapour from the atmosphere, soil evaporation and plant transpiration at hourly intervals in daylight hours and less frequently overnight.
-140
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
-18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4
18O o/oo
2 H
o/ o
oGM
WL
LEL
Local vapour
Root zone water= stem water
= transpired water
Surface water
Surface evaporate
rainwater
Recommended