View
216
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
1/26
Genetically Modified FooTolulope Awolusi, Alicia Brown, Jamesa Hogges, Brittny Thoma
ENVH 7234 Term ro!ect resentation"all 2#$4
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
2/26
Outline
I. IntroductionII.Exposure scenarios and adverse healt
effects associated with GMOsIII.PH ImplicationsIV.Grant ProposalV. ummary
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
3/26
!hat are GMOs"GMFs#
$hrou%h the use ofrecom&inant '()technolo%y* or%anisms+%enetic material can &ealtered and transferred from
one or%anism to another,chep-er* /01. $hisprocess yields %eneticallymodified or%anisms ,GMOs1.
http://mediad.publicbroadcasting.net/p/nhpr/files/201211/EarthTalkPro
osition37alifornia.!P"
0234 5ecom&inant
027/4 First GMO Pa
0274 F') )pproved
o Humulin
02284 GMO Introdu
6ommercial Mar-et
o 9Flavr avr: tom
02224 GMOs )dopte
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
4/26
!hy are GMFs made#
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
5/26
How GMFs are made#
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
6/26
6urrent ; Potential
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
7/26
Humans
Allergenicity Immune system falsely identifies allergens as a xenobiotic and induce allergic re Foreign genes in GM crops may create a new allergen or cause an allergic respons
susceptible individuals.o Ex: the decrease in glutelin levels in rice has been associated with an incre
levels prolamins.
wo main areas of concern is
antibiotic resistance
and al
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
8/26
Humans
wo main areas of concern is
antibiotic resistance
and al
Antibiotic !esistance" Antibiotics are gradually losing their medical effectivenessdue to the increas
of diseases that are becoming resistant
" If bacteria carrying antibiotic resistance genes were to cause an infection# it wo
very difficultfor doctors to treat using traditional antibiotics.
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
9/26
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
10/26
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
11/26
?a&elin%
= (ot reDuired in the
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
12/26
t cotton ,Bacillusthuringiensis1o economic %rowth*
employment* povertyreduction
o decreased use ofpesticides
= Golden rice Vitamin ) dvisual pr
other dis 'isadvanta%
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
13/26
5e%ulations ; 6ontrovers
5e%ulations= 6aseC&yCcase approach
to ris- assessment,F')" EP)1
= )uthoriation permit forenvironmental release ofGMOs ,)PHI1
= ?a&ellin% ,(ot to &eimposedCF')"
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
14/26
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
15/26
Pu&lic Health Implication
Pu&lic )wareness)ccordin% to a survey conducted &y $he Food Policy Institute ,FPI1awareness of GM food consumption is currently low in the
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
16/26
Pu&lic Health Implication
How do we avoid GMOs# >uy or%anic products >uy products that are la&eled
nonCGMO )void atCris- in%redients >uy products listed on a nonC
GMO hoppin% Guide
Visit4www. (onGMOhoppin%Guide.com
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
17/26
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
18/26
Grant Proposal Title of the Proposed Project:Genetically Modified Foods
Potential Funding Source:
o (ational Institute of Health ,(IH1o Food ; 'ru% )dministration ,F')1o
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
19/26
Grant Proposal 6ontinued
Specific Aims: $hrou%hout this proect* studies will &e conducted on determine whether GMOs exposure adversely affects human health.
Significance:!e anticipate that this proect would &e si%nificant due
to uncover the &enefits and disadvanta%es revealed in current research a
what remains un-nown. GMOs can &e viewed positively &ecause they ca
eliminate food insecurity &ut they can also &e viewed ne%atively &ecause
potential harm they may cause re%ardin% &iodiversity and livin% or%anis
proposal with help to raise awareness to the field of pu&lic health &ecau
usa%e is increasin% and the field of research is constantly pro%ressin%.
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
20/26
Grant Proposal 6ontinued
= Approach
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
21/26
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
22/26
Sustaina#ility Measures:)lthou%h the proect is set for a tenCyear study* we
continue this research for lon%er if possi&le.
o !hy#
increase -nowled%e of potential health effects from lon% term exposu
to evaluate new trans%enic %enes that may &e developed in the future
it is possi&le that more %rants will have to &e applied for
%ettin% consumers* trade associations* and possi&ly policyma-ers inv
%enerate money for this research
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
23/26
Grant Proposal 6ontinued $!aluation Plan
Evaluations would &e %iven &iannually to monitor the pro%ress of the propose
well as su&ect participation Budget & ustification !lan
Items Annual
Cost
Total Cost
(10 years)
Laboratory
Testing
$%''' $%&'#'''
Researchers () $%'(#''' $%#'('#''
'
!ub"ect
Incentives
$''' $&'#'''
#ood$
%& crops
'rganic
$)(#*''
$%&*#*('
$)(*#'''
$%#&**#('
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
24/26
5eferences )min* ?.* )&ul* B.* Gausmian* M. H.* ul-ifi* F. ,/081. 'eterminants of pu&lic attitude to %enetica
e7@038.lus %ne &,01.
)n%eli-e* H.* Matthias* M.* or%* 5.* tephan* .* Hanchan* $.* ; >eatrix* $. ,/001. Environmenta%enetically modified plantsC concepts and controversies.En'ironmental (ciences Europe, 23,001.
>oyce* . ).* )ssaad* ).* >ur-s* ). !.* ones* . M.* ampson* H. ).* !ood* 5. ).* . . . chwanin%er* . Guidelines for the 'ia%nosis and Mana%ement of Food )ller%y in the .* Gil&ertson* ?. ).* tau&* . M.* >annon* G. ).* Goodman* 5. E.* ... ; ilvanHuman safety and %enetically modified plants4 a review of anti&iotic resistance mar-ers and future traselection technolo%ies.Journal o) Applie* /icro0iology* &&,01* 3CA.
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
25/26
5eferences 6ontinued a-u&* B. ,//21. Genetically modified a&ominations4 widespread opposition to GMOs mi%ht have
causes.European /olecular Biology %rgani1ation, $#,001.
Ma%aLaCGme* .* ; 6aldern de la >arca* ). ,//21. 5is- assessment of %enetically modified crops fhealth.Nutrition e'iews* 7,01* 0C0@.
Marmiroli* (.* Maestri* E.* GullN* M.* Malcevschi* ).* Peano* 6.* >ordoni* 5.* ; 'e >ellis* G. ,//71. Meof GMOs in food and feed. )nalytical ; >ioanalytical 6hemistry* A2,A1* A@2CA78. doi40/.0//3"s//0@
Morisset* '.* (ova-* P.* upanic* '.* Gruden* B.* ?avrac* (.* ; el* . ,/01. GMOsee-4 a user friendlyGMO testin%.B/+ Bioin)ormatics* 0J* 0C0A.
Pamela* 5. ,/001. Plants* %enetics* sustaina&le a%riculture and %lo&al food security. Genetic ociety of0/.0JA8" %enetics.000. 07JJA.
aim* M. ,/0/1. >enefits of %enetically modified crops for the poor4 household income* nutrition* andBiotechnology* 27,J1* JJCJJ3. doi40/.0/0@".n&t./0/./3.//2
chep-er* B. ,/01. GMO $ruths* 6onseDuences* and the 5i%ht to Bnow. Holistic rimary +are* $3,8 in%h* O.* Ghai* .* Paul* '.* ; ain* 5. ,//@1. Genetically modified crops4 uccess* safety assessment
Appl /icro0iol Biotechnol,7$* J27C@/3. $heresa* P.* ; Phillips* $. ,//71. Genetically modified or%anisms ,GMOs14 $rans%enic 6rops and
Nature E*ucation* $,0140A. Valeria* . ,//@1. $he ethical dilemma of %enetically modified foods. The Journal o) En'ironmental H Vinceno* P.* oanna* P.* 5iccardo* G. ,/001. From ris- assessment to inCcontext traectory evaluation
social implications.En'ironmental (ciences Europe, 23,A1.
8/10/2019 GMFs Final Presentation
26/26
uestions#
Recommended