View
1
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xKALLIOPIDEBONERAS, as Administratrix for the estateof SPYRANGELOS DEBONERAS, and KALLIOPIDEBONERAS, Individually,
Plaintiff(s),
Index No.: 190077/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
-against-
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION,as successor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC.,
ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY,ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA (ALCOA),AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC.,n/k/a RHONE POULENC AG COMPANY,n/k/a BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC.,
AMERICAN OVERSEAS MARINE CORP,BORG-WARNER CORPORATION,by its successor-in-interest,BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC.,
BW/IP, INC. AND ITS WHOLLY OWNEDSUBSIDIARIES,CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a VIACOM INC.,
successor by merger to
CBS CORPORATION, f/k/aWESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION,
CEMEX, INC.,CENTRAL GULF LINES, INC.,CERTAINTEED CORPORATION,CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,Individually, and as successor to UNITED BRANDSCOMPANY, as successor to UNITED FRUIT COMPANY,
EMPIRE-ACE INSULATIONMFG. CORP.,FARRELL LINES, INC.,f/k/a AMERICAN EXPORT CO.,
FLOWSERVEUS, INC.Solely as Successor to Rockwell Manufacturing Company,EdwardValve, Inc.,NordstromValves, Inc.,EdwardVogtValve Company, and Vogt Valve Company,
FMC CORPORATION,on behalfof its former CHICAGO PUMP& NORTHERNPUMP BUSINESSES,
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C.,GARDNER DENVER, INC.,GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
f \JVJL 01 A®
0FF\C£
1
GOULDS PUMPS, INC.,HAPAG-LLOYD (AMERICA), INC.,IMO INDUSTRIES, INC.,,INDEPENDENCE MARITIME AGENCY, INC.,ITT INDUSTRIES, INC.,Individually, and as successor toBELL & GOSSETT COMPANY andas successor to KENNEDY VALVE MANUFACTURINGCo., Inc.,,
MAERSK B.V., FORMERLY NEDLLOYD LINES B.V.,and/or P&O NEDLLOYD B.V.,
MARINE TRANSPORT LINES,MORMAC MARINETRANSPORT, INCIndividually, and as Successor to MOORE-McCORMACKBULK TRANSPORT and MOORE-McCORMACKLINES,
NATIONAL BULK CARRIERS,O.M.S. OVERSEAS MARINE SERVICES LLC,OVERSEAS MARINE CORPORATION,OVERSEAS MARINE MANAGEMENT LTD.,OVERSEAS MARINE SERVICES, INC.,OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.,P&ONEDLLOYD LINES,B.V.,Individually and as successor in interestto FARRELL LINES, Inc.,
PFIZER, INC. (PFIZER),TROJAN MARITIME, INC,U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL),UNIONCARBIDE CORPORATION,UNIVERSE TANKSHIPS,WARREN PUMPS,LLC,WATERMAN STEAMSHIP CORPORATIONMARINE TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC.Individually and as successor to OVERSEAS MARINESERVICES, INC.,
Defendants.
--------..----------------— . —X
WHEREAS, defendant Overseas Marine Services, Inc. (which the New York State,
Department of State, Division of Corporations' Corporation and Business Entity Database
identifies as having DOS ID # 3114591 and as having an Initial DOS FilingDate of October 18,
2
2004) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Overseas Marine Services,
Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Overseas Marine Services, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
A. RomanelliChristopher A. RomanelliWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NewYork 10003Tel. 212-557-5500
Alan Van PraagEdwardW. FloydEATON& VAN WINKLE LLP3 Park AvenueNew York, New York 10016Tel. 212-779-9910
Attorneysfor Plaintiffs Attorneysfor Defendant Overseas MaritimeServices, Inc.
SO ORDERED,HON. MOMLfnaj
JBDN.PETERH.MOULTON
FJUL 07 2015
.TV CLERKS OFFICE
3
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE:NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
NYCAL
I.A.S. PART 50
ÿ (Moulton, 3,)
James Deaboid, INDEXNO. 190310-2014
Plaintiff(s), (Weitz & Luxenberg PC/April 2015InExtremis Trial Cluster)
-against-
A.O. Smith Water Products Co., Inc.,et al.,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTSINC.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto;
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Standard Motor Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkFebruary _72Q 15 Juÿe ÿ *-/ 1c'5
Richard P. O'Leary, Esq.Troutman Sanders LLP
Ambre Bilndis,Esq.Weitz & luxenberg Troutman Sanders LLP
The Chrysler Building700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffJames Deaboid
405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc. clEBksoff\ce
SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton
6//5T
Active 2-4784995v I2445S-1.0OK
Supreme Court of the Stateof NewYorkCounty of New York
InRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
HERMANANDERSON AND DONNA ANDERSON,Individually and as Husband and Wife
Plaintiffs
- against -
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC., et. al.
_Defendants_
New York AsbestosLitigation(NYCAL)
Index No. 190085/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Navistar, Inc. i/s/h/a "Navistar, Inc. and International Truck and
Engine Corporation" ("Navistar"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-titled case, pursuant
to CPLR §3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against defendant, Navistar, along with all cross-claims
against it, with prejudice, there being no opposition hereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,
International Truck and Engine Corporation, (now by operation of name change only known as Navistar,
Inc.), be and the sanÿe are hereby dismissed with prejudice without costs.
Dated:l:
Cellino & Baprfes, P.C£
ByJoeÿA/Vasquez, EsquireAttorneys for Plaintiff
/yA20 Lexington AveNew York, NY 10170
Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC,// um, Qf
ElizabÿhA. Weill, EsquireAttorneys for Defendant,Navistar, Inc., (i/s/h/a Navistar, Inc.and International Truck andCorporation50 S. 16th Street, 22nd FloorTwo Liberty PlacePhiladelphia, PA 19102
SO ORDERED:
x IP
Date:on. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
4&2lJ15
Supreme Court of the State of New YorkCounty of New York
In RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ROBERT V. KESAR AND MARILYN KESAR,
Plaintiffs
- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
_Defendants
New York AsbestosLitigation (NYCAL)
Index No. 190020-15
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
WHEREFORE, defendant, Navistar, Inc., ("Navistar") hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-titled case, pursuant to CPLR §3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaintagainst defendant, Navistar, along with all cross-claims against it,with prejudice, there being no
opposition hereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, Navistar, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice without costs.
Dated: U j 1 1
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.LLC
By: VcCkN3Patti Burshtyn, EsquireAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
By:_
Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott,
'/(jmIaM UJMElizabeth A. Weill, EsquireAttorneys for Defendant,Navistar, Inc.50 S. 16th Street, 22nd Floor*Two Liberty Place ÿ \ <
Philadelphia, PA 1ÿ02 Tw3
coO09*SO ORDERED:
J.S.C.
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
s~JUhj 252015
NYs partsoCOURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ANNE NOLAN,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, f.)
Index No.: 190117/2014
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Plaintiffs,
-against-
AERCO INTERNATIONAL, et al.,
_Defendants._
WHEREFORE, defendant Oakfabco, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant Oakfabco, Inc.with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Oakfabco, Inc,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: NewYork,New YorkMay
a L.Drozdkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLPrneys for Defendantfabco, Inc.
600 Lexington Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 897-9655
SO ORDERED,
niiamsThe Williams Law FirmP.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffAnne Nolan245 Park Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 668-1122
sp-s pr.rr- - K. JLjU <J
H. MOULfeNJSC.
ÿ \ V
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
WALLACE S. HANKINAND HELENHANKIN,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„including OAKFABCO, INC.
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S.PartÿT5"ÿ
Index No.: 190054/2015
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Oakfabco, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant Oakfabco, Inc.with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Oakfabco, Inc,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkMay / ,120ÿ5 Q/f/l5
- c
MamewMÿQumnHawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLPtttorneys for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.600 LexingtonAvenue, 8th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 897-9655
SO ORDERED,
Suzanne/Ml RatcliffeWeitz <SjLLuxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsWallace S. Hankinand HelenH700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500 COÿ
Jun
iti.PETER H.Mod/S Nys
2sttl5rs°c°f/?r.CA/n
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
WALTER CUNNINGHAM AND EVA SUECUNNINGHAM,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
AERCO INTERNATIONAL, et al., includingOAKFABCO, INC.
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S.Partÿob
Index No.: 190136/2014
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Oakfabco, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant Oakfabco, Inc.with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Oakfabco, Inc,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkMay 2015
lav kins Parnell Thackston & Young LLPprneys for Defendantcfabco, Inc.
TOO LexingtonAvenue, 8th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 897-9655
SO ORDERED,
Josephv. WilliamsThe Williams Law Firm,P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsWalter Cunningham and Eva245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122
c \ \.ÿV $6
1ViV Ksofflc*
jun 25 ?0I5NYs
hON.¥>tTER H MOULtOho iV
: C°URr .CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
x
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALHon. Peter H. Moulton
ÿx
CHARLES WATROS andSARAH WATROS, Index No.: 190293/2013
Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-against-
AERCO INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.,including GATES CORPORATION,
Defendants.
—x
WHEREFORE, defendant THE GATES CORPORATION (sued herein as "GATES CORPORATION") hereby
request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant THE GATES CORPORATION with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant THE
GATES CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Dennis Vega, EsqDavid A. ChaR4terrisq,—Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneyfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor The Gates Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center - 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
I9454237vi
03/25/2015 14:56 FAX HOOll/OOlgÿt
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
DONNA MCCOLGAN, as Executrix for the Estate ofJAMES T. MCCOLGAN, and DONNA MCCOLGAN,Individually
Plaintiff,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. andRESEARCH-COTTRELL, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
Index No.: 190125/2013
October 2014 In Extremis ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant RESEARCH-COTTRELL, INC.,n/k/aAWTAir Company, Inc.,hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant RESEARCH-COTTRELL, INC.with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant RESEARCH-COTTRELL, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, NewJfork
BenjaminiJarche, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
¥\ÿSiWilliam T. Miedel, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneys for Research-CottreU. Iqc.1085 Raymond BoulevardOne Newark Center, 16th FlcrorNewark, NJ 07102
VLE
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton,J.S.C.
'/S
JUL"YCNEW
JUhl 252015HYs
Soc°URr .
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALHon. Peter H. Moulton
x
MARY KELLY, as Administratrix for the Estate of RALPHKELLY, and MARY KELLY,
Index No.: 190130/2013
Plaintiffs,NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA (ALCOA),et al., including GATES CORPORATION,
Defendants.
x
WHEREFORE, defendant THE GATES CORPORATION (sued herein as "GATES CORPORATION") hereby
request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant THE GATES CORPORATION with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant THE
GATES CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Charles Ferguson, Esq—-Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Dennis Vega, EsqSedgwick LLP
juMn(i>,-2.o*s
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneyfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Dennis Vega, Esq. ÿ
Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor The Gates Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center - 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102 COUNTY CLERKSOFF1CE
filedJUL 0 7 2015
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ROBERT T. GLASER,
Plaintiff (s) ,-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,
Defendants ,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, 35* )
Index No.: 14/19006092/1453791/16743
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC
d/b/a NATIONAL GRID and LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint
against defendant NATIONAL GRID with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York(oil* 2015
John J. FanrCullen and IwkmanAttorney fmÿDefe idantNATIONAL GRID GEltf 3RATION LLC44 Wall StNew York, \IY-ÿr0005(212) 732-2000
it)ti tr(M3urshtynPactWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
ML 61c«KSOFOCE
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
m ©
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
X NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONI.A.S. Part(Judge Moulton)
This Document Relates to:JESS G. NEGRETE,
XIndex No.: 190074/2014
Plaintiff , SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
against
GOULDS PUMPS, INC., et al .,
Defendants .X
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York, 2015
Attorneys for PlaintiffJess G. Negrete700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Kristen L. Morrisgy/, EsqCULLEN and DYKMAN TjLP
Attorneys for DefendantGOULDS PUMPS, INC. -44 Wall Street, 15t'K:'lj>cNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000 JUFile No. : 6754-12674
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEC
NEW YORK
So Ordered:eter H. Moulton, J.S.C
supreme
Supreme Court of the State of NewYorkCounty of NewYork
InRENEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:New York Asbestos
LEO REGINALD AKERS, Litigation (NYCAL)
Plaintiff IndexNo. 190150/10
- against -
AtTON PUMPS, iNC., Ex AL.NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
Defendants
WHEREFORE, defendant, International Truck and Engine Corporation, (now byoperation of name change only known as Navistar, Inc.) ("Navistar") hereby requests summaryjudgment inthe above-titled case, pursuant to CPLR §3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaintagainst defendant, Navistar, along with all cross-claims against it,with prejudice, there being noopposition hereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, International Truck and Engine Corporation, (now by operation of name change onlyknown as Navistar, Inc.),be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice without costs.
Dated:
Locks Law Firm,PLLC Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC
Mfet C. Walsh, EsquireAttorneys for Plaintiff
\kuhJdJiL$(/lizaljieth A. Weill, Esquire
800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022
International Truck and EngineCorporation, (now by operation of Xchange only known as|5&vi$tait Inc§s»»50 S. 16th Street, 22nd iSfor®Two Liberty Place j\j\_ G "JPhiladelphia, PA 19102 r-avosC
Attorneys for Defendant,International Truck and E
qFFICE
SO ORDERED:
HON.PETERH.MOULTON J S C
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
BERNARD TANNENBAUM, Index No.: 190370/14
Plaintiff,
against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as successor to TAPPAN andCOPES-VULCAN, et al.
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION
-XWHEREFORE, Defendant, ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,
Individually and as successor to Tappan and Copes-Vulcan (hereinafter
"ELECTROLUX") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant, ELECTROLUX, with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross
claims against defendant, ELECTROLUX, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: /hite Plains,sfij ÿ
White jÿjains, New York2015
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
CYNTHIA K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh Messemer &Moroknek LLP .
Attorneys for DefendantELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as successor to Tappayÿ IJand Copes-Vulcan < IV, W55 Church Street, Suite 211%" *White Plains, NY 10601 rt\\ §1 ÿ
Tel: 914-385-6000
So Ordered: J.S.C.
f \
co>J,iT{ieir(OP'K
,pfcffc** j.S.C.
I
*SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XJANE DISTEFANO and PHILLIP DISTEFANO, Index No.: 190364/14
Plaintiffs, SECONDNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION
against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as successor to TAPPAN andCOPES-VULCAN, etal.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, Defendant, ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,
Individually and as successor to Tappan and Copes-Vulcan (hereinafter
"ELECTROLUX") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant, ELECTROLUX, with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross
claims against defendant, ELECTROLUX, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: White Plains, New YorkQ,ih , 2015/hite PlainxfSi.
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
CYNTHIA K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh Messemer &Moroknek LLPAttorneys for Defend;ELECTROLUX HOMIndividually and as si
and Copes-Vulcan55 Church Street, SuWhite Plains, NY 106Tel: 914-385-6000
So Ordered
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X Index No. 190192/14DIANE MCLAUGHLIN, as Executrix for the Estate ofKENNETH MCLAUGHLIN, JR. and DIANEMCLAUGHLIN, individually,
- against -
Plaintiffs,SECONDNO OPPISITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC.,ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as Successor to Tappan andCopes-Vulcan, et al.,
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, Defendant, ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,
Individually and as successor to Tappan and Copes-Vulcan (hereinafter
"ELECTROLUX") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant, ELECTROLUX, with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross
claims against defendant, ELECTROLUX, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: White Plains, New York 'vN? yQ , 2015 QA_
Phan Alvarado, Esq.Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
in Alvarado CYNTHIA K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh & Messemer LLPAttorneys for DefendantELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as successor to Tappanand Copes-Vulcan55 Church Street, Suite 211White Plains, NY 10601Tel: 914-385-6000
So Orderei
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
WILLIAM D. EBANKS,
- against -Plaintiff,
Index No. 190040/15
SECONDNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and as Successorto Sarco Company, et al.,
Defendants.=X
WHEREFORE, Defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and as
successor to Sarco Company (hereinafter "SPIRAX SARCO") hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant,
SPIRAX SARCO, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross
claims against defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Whitq Plains, New York(f 7m ,2015
./
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
L°A./
CYNTHIA K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh & Messemer LLPAttorneys for DefendantSPIRAX SARCO, INC.55 Church Street, Suite 211White Plains, NY 10601Tel: 914-385-6000
So Ordered: J.S.C.
HON. PETESHIUOULTONJ.S.C.
W/;COUNÿÿOWÿ.EÿS,
1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK==========================================XJAMES WIDERMAN and MARY WIDERMAN,His wife, Index No. 190392-14
Plaintiffs,- against - NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
A.O. SMITH CORPORATION,SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and asSuccessor to Sarco Company, et al.,
Defendants.==========================================X
WHEREFORE, Defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and as
Successor to Sarco Company (hereinafter "SPIRAX SARCO") hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant,
SPIRAX SARCO, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross
claims against defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: White Plains, New YorkOAS , 2015
"y
DAVID CHANDLER, ESQ.Karst & von Oiste, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs576 5th Avenue, Suite 401New York, New York 10036(212) 764-3900
CYNTHIA"K. MESSEMER, ESQHodges Walsh & Messemer, LLPAttorneys for DefendantSPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individi&lyf nSuccessor to Sarco Company *55 Church Street, Suite 211 )\j\_
D81 59®
White Plains, NY 10601Tel: 914-385-6000
QpF'CE
So Ordered J.S.C.
HON.PEIBM;.MGUEM3H7/6/ IS
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
ÿX NYCALI.A.S. Parÿfpfciilei', ,INRE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONIndex No. 01-113335
ÿX
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT
MOTIONAND ORDERJOSEPH C. McKENDRY
ÿX
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
Patterson-Kelley Divisionwith prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
6> I( £
Frank-Ortiz, Esq
__y_
SamhSPGoldblatt, EsofBenjamin R. DwyerEsq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. NIXON PEABODY LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Attorneys for Defendant,Patterson-Kelley CompanyKey Towers at Fountain Plaza40 Fountain Plaza, Suite 500Buffalo,NY 14202(716) 853-8100
tiO
SO ORDERED,Jon. Peter H.Moulton
4821-0003-1523 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190263/14
JEREMIAH P. SULLIVAN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer,
Inc. ("Eaton"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Eaton with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant Eatonbe and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Benjamin D$cne,Esq.
,2015
ÿ/Gabriel G. ferstendig, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, PC700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
McELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY& CARPENTER, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Eaton Corporation,
2571852
// -- i~l(don. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190405/13
EUGENE SOWA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer,
Inc. ("Eaton"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Eaton
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Eatonbe and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Qÿbriel G. Ferstendig, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney &
Erik Jacobs, Esq. (
Weitz & Luxenberg, P1O- McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Eaton Corporation, as
10003 successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
SO ORDERED,He Hilton, J.S.C.
2292386
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190237/11
WILLIAM T. CRUGER and ALEXISCRUGER NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer,
Inc. ("Eaton"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Eaton with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant Eatonbe and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
6\ ,2015
J3tibriel G. FerSfendig, Esq.Attorneys for Eaton Corporation, asinterest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc.
Frank Ortiz, EsqTAWeitz & Luxenberg, PC700 Broadway
Attorneys for Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
New York, New York 10003
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H.Moulton
oc \\&r ,, v*
2681081
1
-X
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
VINCENT S. ROSSI and LINDA ROSSI,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
ABB, INC.as successor in interest to ITE CIRCUIT BREAKERS, INC,et al.,
NYCALI.A.S. Part(HeitWj I)
Index No. 190411/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
Defendants.-X
WHEREFORE, defendant PFIZER INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
defendant PFIZER INC. only with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant PFIZER INC. only be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
c°sts. s/if/aoir
CarrrTCTf St. George fjWEITZ & luxenberg;P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Telephone: (212) 558-5580Facsimile: (212) 344-5461Attorneys for PlaintiffsVincent and Linda Rossi
Nicole A. SpenceRENZULLILAW FIRM,LLP81 Main Street, Suite 508White Plains,NY 10601Telephone: (914) 285-0700Facsimile: (914)285-1213Attorneys for DefendantPfizer Inc.
« ««»»
rEcÿsf
SO ORDERED
l.PETER
-X NYCAL ÿI.A.S.PartÿcT ÿ
-X <IIullu,J.) -Index No. 190265/2013
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
WILLIAM D. WHITSON and ROSE WHITSON,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant PFIZER, INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
defendant PFIZER, INC. only with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant PFIZER, INC. only be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Ambre BrandisWEITZ AuJXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Telephone: (212) 558-5580Facsimile: (212) 344-5461Attorneys for PlaintiffsWilliam and Rose Whitson
GutU- 12,J0|6
_ —ÿ_Nicole A. SÿenceRENZULLILAW FIRM,LLP81 Main Street, Suite 508White Plains, NY 10601Telephone: (914) 285-0700Facsimile: (914)285-1213Attorneys for DefendantPfizer, Inc.
sslsiW®•weL0«SOFnC6
SO ORDERED tA//HON. PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
JUN 1 7 2015
—5
t
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-X
-XThis Document Relates To:
SUSAN K.HAZARD, Individually and as Executrixof the Estate of WALTER ROBINSON HAZARD,deceased,
Plaintiffs,
INDEX NO.: 190377/2014
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
vs.
SELBY, BATTERSBY & CO., INC.,et al.,
Defendants.-X
WHEREFORE, Defendant, SB DECKING, INC. f/k/a Selby, Battersby & Company,
hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and
Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant, SB DECKING, INC.
f/k/a Selby, Battersby & Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-Defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, SB DECKING, INC. f/k/a Selby, Battersby & Company, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice without costs.
Dated: New York,N-tU
Buffalo,New
'1.1l\>
Jordan C. Fox,,BELLUCK I&/FCTX, LLPAttorneys foyPlaintiff546 FifthAvenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036(212) 681-1575
SO ORDERED,Horkÿeter H. Moulton
-'fajjfcUk/i [ÿ!Ikuuf \
Rachel A. Emminger, Esq.FELDMAN KIEFFER, LLPAttorneysfor Defendant SB Decking, Inc.f/k/a Selby, Battersby & Co.110 Pearl Street, 4th FloorBuffalo,New York 1420£
"""""*I'S
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIn Re: Asbestos Litigation
xThis Document Applies To: Index No. :
190209-14JAY A. GAYOSO and SHARON GAYOSO
Plaintiff (s) , STIPULATION OFDISCONTINUANCEAS AGAINSTFORD MOTOR COMPANYONLY
-vs-
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. (AHM)et .al . ,
Defendants .x
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between theundersigned, that whereas no party hereto is an infant,incompetent person for whom a committee has been appointed orconservatee and no person not a party has an interest in thesubject matter of the action, the above entitled action be, andthe same hereby is discontinued, as against FORD MOTOR COMPANY,with prejudice and without costs to either party as against theother. This stipulation may be filed without further noticewith the Clerk of the Court.
Dated: New York, New YorkJune 08, 2015
Nancy Pÿfnnie, EsqAttorneys for Defendants
FORD MOTOR COMPANYAARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &
DEUTSCH, LLP600 Third Avenue, 5th FloorNew York , NY 10005
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for plaintiff (s)700 BroadwayNew York, New Y
07 70®,-TY CLERKS OFFICE
C°ÿ»
SOHÿucrett:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
ROBERT BRUCE BURAWA and DEBORAH ANNBURAWA,
Index No. 190272/2012
Plaintiffs, STIPULATIONDISCONTINUING ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE-against-
ACKER DRILL COMPANY, et al.
Defendants.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, the
attorneys of record for the plaintiff and defendant named below in the above entitled action, that
whereas no party hereto is an infant, incompetent person for whom a committee has been
appointed or conservatee and no person not a party has an interest in the subject matter of the
action, the above entitled action be, and the same hereby is discontinued, in accordance with the
terms of the accompanying release, with prejudice as to FORD MOTOR COMPANY without
costs to any party as against the other. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with
the Clerk of the Court.
Dated: New York, New YorkJune 4, 2015
BELITtriÿ & pnv it p AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN&DEUTSCH, LLP
Joseph W. Beiluck, Esq.Attorneysfor Plaintiff546 FifthAvenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036
N ehnie, Esq.Ai )r Defendant6( WenueNew York, NY 10016
le, Esc
<so otipgib: x' tqhHON,Pÿtenrv",",~
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
RENA N. BAILEN, Individually and as Executrix tothe Estate of EDDIE HOWARD BAILEN,deceased,
Index No. 190318/2012
Plaintiffs, STIPULATIONDISCONTINUING ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE-against-
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, asSuccessor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc.,et al.
Defendants.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, the
attorneys of record for the plaintiff and defendant named below in the above entitled action, that
whereas no party hereto is an infant, incompetent person for whom a committee has been
appointed or conservatee and no person not a party has an interest in the subject matter of the
action, the above entitled action be, and the same hereby is discontinued, in accordance with the
terms of the accompanying release, with prejudice as to FORD MOTOR COMPANY without
costs to any party as against the other. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with
the Clerk of the Court.
Dated: New York, New YorkJune 3, 2015
BELLUCK & FOX,LLP AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN&DEUTSCH,LLP
Joseph Wf%elluck, Esq. NarfcAttorneysfor Plaintiff Attoi546 FifthAvenue, 4th Floor 600 '
New York, New York 10036 New York, NY 10016 U\U ÿ (
(jt) dfcQEKifpjSST 'f 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
x
INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,'!-.)
-x
GLADYS RICHMOND, as Executrix for the Estate of Index No. 100309/07MURRAY L. WHITE, and GLADYS RICHMOND, asExecutrix for the Estate of EMMA C. WHITE,
Plaintiffs,NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et ah,including, MORSE DIESEL, INC.
Defendants,
-x
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment inthe
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
JJK& 3ÿ2015
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffsGladys Richmond, as Executrixfor the Estate ofMurray L. White, and Gladys Richmond, asExecutrixfor the Estate ofEmma C. White700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY,LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285 1
jfcBVCSpÿ
SO ORDERED, ,Hon. Peter H.Moulton
Dated:G Si
INRE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
GERARD E. SCHIAVO,
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-x
•x
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,ÿ£.)
Index No. 112522/06
Plaintiff,
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et al„including, MORSE DIESEL, INC.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants,
-x
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc.,hereby requests summary judgment inthe
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York—Tulÿe ÿ>2015
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffGerardE. Schiavo700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY,LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285
jvj\_ 61 2015
SO ORDERED,HOxx. x XX. x.xxxxxxxxxxx
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
THOMAS H.DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
NYCAL
Index No: 190525/2012
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
-against-
3M CO. (f/k/a Minnesota Mining& Manufacturing Co.) et al.,includingABB, INC.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant ABB, Inc. (sued as "ABB, Inc., (as successor to ITE Imperial Co.,
f/k/a ITECircuit Breaker Co.) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant ABB, Inc.
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
ABB, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: N&w York, New York
.2.9—. 2015
/jqsephN.
__/.Ianier lawfirm,pllc
126 East 56"' St., 6'" FloorNew York, NY 10022Attorneysfor PlaintiffThomas H. Davis(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, .Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Matthew E. Endlich, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneysfor DefendantABB, Inc.(212) 791-0285
DATED: 1MIT
p \ l»07—-gssr*
INRE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
This Document Relates to:
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
x
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
Index No. 19004'.„
STUART L. MCMAHON and CAMILLE MCMAHON NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant Reynolds Metals Company, hereby requests summary
judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant Reynolds Metals Company, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Reynolds Metals Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York/ New York
-x
2015
Michael J. Curtis, Esq.Patti Burshtyn, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,PC700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)(212) 558-5500
MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneysfor Defendant(212) 791-0285 It 07
Y CL-EBKSN&w VOBY
SO ORDERED, Dated:ffon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
STUART L.MCMAHON and CAMILLE MCMAHON,
Plaintiffs,
-v.-
NYCAL
Index No. 190047/2015
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
A.O. SMTH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL„ including,CROWN BOILER CO.
Defendants.
-x
WHEREFORE, defendant CROWN BOILER CO., F/K/A CROWN INDUSTRIES, INC.
("Crown Boiler") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Crown
Boiler with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Crown Boiler be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,/New York
1 ) 2015
Patti Burhtyn, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Attorneysfor PlaintiffsStuart McMahon, et al.(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Eva S. Wayne, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneysfor DefendantCrown Boiler Co.(212) 791-0285 file
JUL o ÿ
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Hon. Peter H. MoultonDated: jjpj/t>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
STUART L. MCMAHON and CAMILLE MCMAHON,
Plaintiffs,
-v.-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL„ including,SUPERIOR BOILER WORKS, INC.,
Defendants.
NYCAL
Index No. 190047/2015
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant SUPERIOR BOILER WORKS, INC. ("Superior") hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Superior with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Superior be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New YorkJNew York1h ,2015
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,PC700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Attorneysfor PlaintiffStuart McMahon, et al.(212) 558-5500
Eva S. Wayne, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneysfor DefendantSuperior Boiler Works, Inc.(212) 791-0285
SO ORDERED Dated:lion. Shcny Klein Ilcitli*--"ON-PErERH.MOULTQN
y/lfjts
F \ V-jULdt 10,5
-X
Index No.: 190464/12
SECONDNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NANCY DURGIN, as Executrix for the Estate ofEDWARD DURGIN and NANCY DURGIN, Individually,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK, INC.,ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as successor to TAPPAN andCOPES-VULCAN, et al„
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,
Individually and as successor to Tappan and Copes-Vulcan (hereinafter
"ELECTROLUX") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant, ELECTROLUX, with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross
claims against defendant, ELECTROLUX, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: White Plains, New York,2015
BarUsLP. DlouinrfeWeitz & LuxenbergÿAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
So Ordered
ÿV-H O CYNTHIA K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh Messemer &Moroknek LLPAttorneys for DefendantELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INjIndividually and as successoUo«ra%parand Copes-Vulcan r Iÿ55 Church Street, Suite 211 q"]Whito Plainc NY-infim 3ÿ rr,rcWhite Plains, NY 10601Tel: 914-385-6000
J.S.C.
WON.PETERH.MOULTON
VS
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XDON P. DONOVAN and KATHLEEN DONOVAN, Index No. 190046/2015
Plaintiffs,- against -
ABB, INC.,SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and as successorto Sarco Company, et al.,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, Defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and as
successor to Sarco Company (hereinafter "SPIRAX SARCO") hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant,
SPIRAX SARCO, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross
claims against defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: White Plains, New York, 2015
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
CYNTHIA K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh & Messemer LLPAttorneys for Defendant
So Ordered:,>N.PETERH.MOULTON
ÿ4
SPIRAX SARCO, INC.55 Church Street, Suite 211White Plains, NY 10601 1Tel: 914-385-6000 '
supreme
S Qr'RCt
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
WILLIAM D. EBANKS,
- against -Plaintiff,
=X Index No. 190040/15
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and as Successorto Sarco Company, et al.,
Defendants.=X
WHEREFORE, Defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and as
successor to Sarco Company (hereinafter "SPIRAX SARCO") hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant,
SPIRAX SARCO, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross
claims against defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: White Plains, New York, 2015
Parti Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
CYNTHIA-K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh & Messemer LLPAttorneys for DefendantSPIRAX SARCO, INC.55 Church Street, Suite 211White Plains, NY 10601 ÿ JTel: 914-385-6000
So Ordered
JVJV. 07 20ft
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
_J.S.C. fjlpjlÿ covjtfÿ CORK'S OFFICEyobb
©
Recommended