FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

3D Perspective Drawing3D Modelling

Assessment Task

Assessment Criteria

0 - Does not meet expectations

3 - Meets expectations

5 - Exceeds expectations

Brainstorm Absent or incomplete.

Sketches character design, researches, makes design decisions based on research.

Sketches character design, follows design process, makes adjustments and justifies changes.

Process Absent or incomplete. Follows character design on software, makes adjustments, works in 3D space

Clearly follows design, makes necessary adjustments, transfers content to software with accuracy

Flat Pack Toy Absent or incomplete. Creates character with appropriate specifications for a flat-pack toy. Prints and creates toy as designed.

Meets the design specifications and creates innovative flat-pack toy.

Evaluation Absent, incomplete, or unfinished.

Evaluation includes rationale for design. Evaluation explains how the design process communicates purpose and details changes made in the review and redesign cycle. Evaluation reflects design decisions.

Evaluation is clear and compelling. Rationale is succinct and logical. Evaluation clearly explains flat-pack toy creation.

Ryan Ockerby08H19037

Study Score: EA

• Design Sketches• Layout• Utilising software program• Evaluation• TQA Record Sheet

Design Sketches

Layout

ProductFront View

Stig Back

Side View

Side View

Evaluation

Dominic Swain08Z21212

• Design Sketches• Layout• Utilising software program• Evaluation• TQA Record Sheet

Design Sketch

Front View

Back View

Side Views

Top View

Evaluation

Ben

• Design Sketches• Layout• Utilising software program• Evaluation

Design Sketch

Front View

Back View

Side Views

Student: Caleb Gillett

Student Score:

• Design Sketches• Layout• Utilising software program• Evaluation

Layout

Glaives

Wings

Evaluation• Evaluation• Things I would change: Eyes, Legs & feet.• Why: The eyes were a main focus of my design to begin with but as other things became more attractive they lost my

attention and in the end did not look as good as I had originally intended. The legs and feet I wanted to completely ignore to begin with but I could not find a logic way to remove them. I needed shoes to put something on the bottom square of the flat pack but I didn’t want to compromise the looks of the front and back.

• How would I solve?: If I were to do this same character again I would cut the legs completely and just have a small set of shoes on the bottom, which at one point I planned to do but I couldn’t figure out what to do with the bottom. A set of boot prints on the bottom would give it a nice effect also. I would givethe eyes a much brighter glow and a more luminous effect.

• Problems encountered: The biggest problem that I encountered was trying to transfigure my 3d character from an entity and a character into a flat pack toy. To do this I tried cartoonizing him, making him look realer and eventually finding a happy medium. Some other smaller problems were defining his mid-section and colouring the parts, as well as some other minor issues with printing and producing the final piece. Another major problem is the fact that with his glaives he cant stand without a podium.

• How the problems were solved: The best thing I found was to re-proportionalize his body and make him a mini version of what he is in the pictures. Defining his mid-section took some time but in the end pasting in some abs, putting a belt on him made him look like a real figure even with his legs bent at an ungodly angle. Colouring was a real problem because I failed to close my lines as I was working with a new program, so I had to precisely paint in between the liens using the paintbrush tool which caused some minor problems when printing which were easily solved by a uniform scale. Gluing and cutting all the parts together was really hard but producing double of the wings and glaives made it a much more stable and solid piece of work.

Student No:

Study Score: SA

• No Design Sketches• No Layout• Satisfactory creation of 3D Model using

software• No evaluation

Front View

Back View

Side View Left

Top View

Jacob Schlieb

• No Design Sketches• Good Use of Software program• No Evaluation• TQA Record Sheet

Lincoln Stretton

Fail• No Design Sketches• Inability to transfer 3D perspective onto a

software program• No Evaluation

Front View

Back View

Side View

Side View