47
FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT 3D Perspective Drawing 3D Modelling

FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

  • Upload
    kylee

  • View
    71

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT. 3D Perspective Drawing 3D Modelling. Assessment Task. Assessment Criteria. Ryan Ockerby 08H19037. Study Score: EA Design Sketches Layout Utilising software program Evaluation TQA Record Sheet. Design Sketches. Layout. Product Front View. Stig Back. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

3D Perspective Drawing3D Modelling

Page 2: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Assessment Task

Page 3: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Assessment Criteria

0 - Does not meet expectations

3 - Meets expectations

5 - Exceeds expectations

Brainstorm Absent or incomplete.

Sketches character design, researches, makes design decisions based on research.

Sketches character design, follows design process, makes adjustments and justifies changes.

Process Absent or incomplete. Follows character design on software, makes adjustments, works in 3D space

Clearly follows design, makes necessary adjustments, transfers content to software with accuracy

Flat Pack Toy Absent or incomplete. Creates character with appropriate specifications for a flat-pack toy. Prints and creates toy as designed.

Meets the design specifications and creates innovative flat-pack toy.

Evaluation Absent, incomplete, or unfinished.

Evaluation includes rationale for design. Evaluation explains how the design process communicates purpose and details changes made in the review and redesign cycle. Evaluation reflects design decisions.

Evaluation is clear and compelling. Rationale is succinct and logical. Evaluation clearly explains flat-pack toy creation.

Page 4: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Ryan Ockerby08H19037

Study Score: EA

• Design Sketches• Layout• Utilising software program• Evaluation• TQA Record Sheet

Page 5: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Design Sketches

Page 6: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT
Page 7: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT
Page 8: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT
Page 9: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT
Page 10: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Layout

Page 11: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT
Page 12: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

ProductFront View

Page 13: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Stig Back

Page 14: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Side View

Page 15: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Side View

Page 16: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Evaluation

Page 17: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Dominic Swain08Z21212

• Design Sketches• Layout• Utilising software program• Evaluation• TQA Record Sheet

Page 18: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Design Sketch

Page 19: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Front View

Page 20: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Back View

Page 21: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Side Views

Page 22: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Top View

Page 23: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Evaluation

Page 24: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Ben

• Design Sketches• Layout• Utilising software program• Evaluation

Page 25: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Design Sketch

Page 26: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Front View

Page 27: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Back View

Page 28: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Side Views

Page 29: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Student: Caleb Gillett

Student Score:

• Design Sketches• Layout• Utilising software program• Evaluation

Page 30: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Layout

Page 31: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Glaives

Page 32: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Wings

Page 33: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Evaluation• Evaluation• Things I would change: Eyes, Legs & feet.• Why: The eyes were a main focus of my design to begin with but as other things became more attractive they lost my

attention and in the end did not look as good as I had originally intended. The legs and feet I wanted to completely ignore to begin with but I could not find a logic way to remove them. I needed shoes to put something on the bottom square of the flat pack but I didn’t want to compromise the looks of the front and back.

• How would I solve?: If I were to do this same character again I would cut the legs completely and just have a small set of shoes on the bottom, which at one point I planned to do but I couldn’t figure out what to do with the bottom. A set of boot prints on the bottom would give it a nice effect also. I would givethe eyes a much brighter glow and a more luminous effect.

• Problems encountered: The biggest problem that I encountered was trying to transfigure my 3d character from an entity and a character into a flat pack toy. To do this I tried cartoonizing him, making him look realer and eventually finding a happy medium. Some other smaller problems were defining his mid-section and colouring the parts, as well as some other minor issues with printing and producing the final piece. Another major problem is the fact that with his glaives he cant stand without a podium.

• How the problems were solved: The best thing I found was to re-proportionalize his body and make him a mini version of what he is in the pictures. Defining his mid-section took some time but in the end pasting in some abs, putting a belt on him made him look like a real figure even with his legs bent at an ungodly angle. Colouring was a real problem because I failed to close my lines as I was working with a new program, so I had to precisely paint in between the liens using the paintbrush tool which caused some minor problems when printing which were easily solved by a uniform scale. Gluing and cutting all the parts together was really hard but producing double of the wings and glaives made it a much more stable and solid piece of work.

Page 34: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Student No:

Study Score: SA

• No Design Sketches• No Layout• Satisfactory creation of 3D Model using

software• No evaluation

Page 35: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Front View

Page 36: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Back View

Page 37: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Side View Left

Page 38: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT
Page 39: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Top View

Page 40: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Jacob Schlieb

• No Design Sketches• Good Use of Software program• No Evaluation• TQA Record Sheet

Page 41: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Lincoln Stretton

Fail• No Design Sketches• Inability to transfer 3D perspective onto a

software program• No Evaluation

Page 42: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Front View

Page 43: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Back View

Page 44: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Side View

Page 45: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT

Side View

Page 46: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT
Page 47: FLAT PACK TOYS ASSESSMENT